You faggots have all bought into the hype: There is no hope for any robot that isn't in constant communication with home base to help it make all of its decisions; you can use a cell phone to make these things worthless and that's even assuming they somehow managed to cram all of the decision making into a portable unit.
Even better: these things are so hackable that the Russians have dedicated weapons that don't even need a radio to fuck with them. They have to navigate by fucking QR codes; let that sink in.
This is all without even touching on how expensive they are to make, deploy, operate, and maintain: they're garbage that sci fi fetishists at DARPA inexplicably spend money on hoping to get their obedient baby killers they always dreamed of. Speaking of which, go look up "Darpa competition fails," to get a good idea of where we're at when you turn off the wifi.
Parker Campbell
You've played way too many video games and watched way too many damned movies. Makes you way too damned young to be discussing this kind of thing even if your old enough to have an grey beard. But lets enlighten since you seem to think technology is magic. Friendship is magic too, so here is some friendly advice. Stop making assumptions. You seem to write from the point of view that all conflicts are total war in open combat environments where there are sides and known forces arrayed against each other. That such bots will be deployed when weapons free is standard and no confusion will exist in the environment they are deployed. That bots will not be limited by such things as energy, fuel, maintenance, weight, speed, heat/cooling issues, armor tradeoffs, weapon capacity, size, cost and far more options I could list here. This is an sad lack of foresight into the future of war, especially when addressing why these weapons are being developed. If such an view was the case our current system of war focus ensures continued war fighting dominance for the foreseeable future. But everyone everywhere throughout the world in the military are constantly shouting warnings and focusing on non uniformed urban combat based conflict being both the norm, objectively costly, and currently unwinnable. Their focus on this bot tech path is their way to try and retake the initiative and become overwhelming to counter insurgent forces whom are not going to just sit there and be and easy target. You seem to think bots will be the size and weight of MBT's across the board and simply win by being in an area.
There are massive tradeoffs in everything you do. Nothing is more stark about this kind of choice than when you have to make such choices in war. You seem to think that bots will be able to do everything and be the perfect counter and nothing will counter them. Everything has an weakness and trade off, but you ignored it all in order to sound superior in your own mind on that post. If that is what you think, enjoy your jewish dominated mind, you are not thinking like an white man and are certainly not working out how the future will unfold.
Jose Reyes
Good posts. Sci-Fi faggots can fuck off.
Justin Young
Obligatory thread theme.
Jack Smith
Terminators don't need to eat, sleep, drink, shit or have their egos stroked. Human soldiers do.
Kayden Robinson
I'll second the other user, you're a retard. It was simply an observation made by Gordon Moore that according to the specs from the Intel fabs sitting right in front of him on his desk every day, that transistor density was increasing by double roughly every 18 to 24 months. Calling it a law was just a retarded gimmick used primarily by tech journalist shills. Thermodynamics has killed that growth rate for CPUs, and that trend will reverse only when the laws of physics stop working. Yes GPUs and FPGAs indeed are a computational powerhouse as I already pointed out ITT. But they still have various limits and trust me, parallel programming on these architectures is no trivial matter. I do it for a living.
