How the Hell do you "slip" a law?
ALIPAC has discovered a new (((amnesty))) bill slipping into Congress: the proposed Succeed Act
How the hell do you "slip" a signature?
...
Stop looking into it, goy.
I meant we don't know details yet, a factual statement, not that they aren't trying to fuck us and wreck america
agreed
this is exactly the type of thing Trump started pushing for.
manufactured distraction
not going to happen, especially in senate. at most we could get one or two in the house in the way the (subverted) tea party did.
the history of failure of the right wing is to show people evidence and tell people we need better congressman to fix it. Then you get someone new in, he votes better for a term or two to get more power, and then he turns into the same ones we have now. SenateAnon was probably fake, but his point of everyone being blackmailed or bought off is correct.
I said "I don't mean I know a magic strategy for winning"
my point is there are no guarantees of success, but there are proven paths to failure.
this is exactly what campaign pamphlets and ads consist of, and in the end, it's who is the better propagandist, who plays dirtier, who has more money. Not facts.
Don't take the whitepill or whatever gay trs meme and pretend your tactics work because you want them to and double down
OUR RACE WILL NOT SURVIVE IF WE ALWAYS FOCUS ON THE NEXT ELECTION
I'm not saying don't tell people that they vote against whites, against america, for the jews. I do. But it's not near enough, and it doesn't do anything to stop what they are doing NOW.
Votes better for a term or two?
Look at the tea party cadre. Almost all of them immediately were lackeys to the leadership.
Even in your own scenario you admit it will succeed even if it just buys us time.
Did we not essentually run Trump's online campaign?
By the same token user, don't be a hypocrite and pretend something won't work because - oh wait the only explanation there is that you're a defeatist. What other plan do you propose then? I've illustrated in great detail how simple and easy a plan like this is and how it's backed by our proven effect on things. The media fears our influence. What plans do you have to offer?
Amusing. Now you go type in all caps as if that changes your real tone. You want to make it sound like I'm betting it all on this or any election when the problem still remains that our countries are at the mercy of (((democracy))). By all means user, help us discover a way to bypass democracy. Maybe take the FBIposters advice and actually bomb a federal building or whatever sting they want you to fall for. And hey, I'm an optimist so maybe you might succeed and get away with it. You have to believe in yourself. Or you can keep posting how things are ineffectual and that's really helpful. Nothing works so why do anything, I get it. Just come out and say it already. You already do at this point.
I agree on that last part but that's a totally moot point. That's like saying we can't stop something because we can't immediately stop something. This is again just plain old defeatism. Did ZOG hatch their schemes overnight? Did the jewish merchant wring his hands all day in his shop in ancient babylon? No. The jews didn't take over overnight. They made plans. Plans take time. This is painfully obvious.
The next thing to address is you saying it is "not near enough," which is again just plain old defeatism. Even if we have a minimal effect, or half of the zogbots still get back re-elected, that's half of their strength gone.
Better yet, the most optimal but realistic outcome in this is that nearly all of them get ousted in the election and that means the ZOG agents have to scramble to blackmail them all the new ones. Do you know how hard it will be to blackmail dozens of politicians and how much room for error that leaves? They will be stretched thin. Some will see it coming. We can catch CIAniggers in the act. This simple plan is so potent that it opens up new possibilities.
But look at how utterly defeated you are inside when you can't see a solid opportunity where in every scenario we stll effect the overall outcome. If you're not a defeatist shill you might as well be one. When useful idiots are made there's also useful defeatists. You prove it.
I'm seeing that we're Whittling away and that we're steadily becoming the thing to pander to.
I was thinking of my own representatives, one cucked for the main local lobby for years but was otherwise closer to ron paul. As soon as he got where he wanted, he proved himself a traitor. Another one had a manufactured controversey over sexism and got beat by a scumbag RINO (who got support from Trump)
I started to reply point by point, but the further I read, the more you sounded like a disingenuous kike.
If I was a disingenuous kike I would be agreeing with everything you said previously and feeding the defeatist tone you're spreading. If you're butthurt that I exposed all of that, you only have yourself to blame. Either way you surrender by default since you provided no rebuttal.