Emotion, Money and Plurality (EMP); those are the greatest flaws of democracy.
Emotion: each and every government works under emotions, democracy is no exception, on the contrary, it's the government system where emotion is exploited the most. political candidates always use ( against each other) this as a method of bargain and manipulation, expecting that the masses react positively to their message ( for example; X is a big meanie, he wants to loosen gun control and allow psychopaths to brutalize your children! Vote for Y instead. Of course you might call bullshit on that, but what about the other weak minded individuals? Do you think they will react like you? Absolutely not. They will swallow the message and start reproducing it to other individuals, weak and strong minded)
Money: We live in a capitalist, liberal world. What does that mean? It means that now politicians can be bought by (((them))), for (((them))) only. Maybe do a couple of miniscule promises you made for the goyim, but the rest is for the elite. It's a pay 2 govern system , your vote ( nor your candidate promises) matter when the whole system is bought and controlled by an elite, if such candidate is not controlled, then the likes can simply pay the media some shekels to heavily slander the bad goy candidate and unanimously praise their good goy candidate. Remember that in a real democracy weak minded simpletons are the majority, and they will easily eat the bullshit presented by the mass media, the newspapers, the jewtubers, the actors from Hollywood, the singers, etc. If the method above fails, they will proceed and do something worse, which is rig the election, with their financial power.
Plurality: keep the goyim divided, and they will never unite against you. That should be the slogan of democracy. Pretty self explanatory, division is fomented on the core ( by creating multiple political parties, each with their "unique" agendas). People will never be united to fix the nation, there will always be an (((opposition))) that will slow down the progress of a nation. On a monarchy, fascist or national socialist government (or any half decent authoritarian government), the people are united against a common threat, and for a common goal. Something like that is impossible in a weak, democratic government, divided by their own opinions, nothing gets achieved