What did I say about riddles man?
I'm with you.
I can't agree with you there, or at least, not in those words.
Evolution selects for improvement, true, however, reproduction for yourself to the exclusion of others as the motivating factor for reproductive organisms is the motor that drives that process. Reproduction sans to the exclusion of others, to at least a certain extent, is unquestionably fitness-negative in basically all circumstances - Darwinian fitness/law dictates that you must desire to reproduce, and by definition this is to the exclusion of at least some others. You want your kids to be better, but you also want your kids to be you, of a sense.
Kikes don't care about their children beyond that the 'want your kids to be you part' - they cease caring as to whether or not there's any improvement there, so long as they retain that 'you'ness, as it were.
In point of fact, I would suggest the Jews do not want the reproduction of themselves to the exclusion of others - they want the reproduction of themselves, alongside the reproduction of others, those others being viewed as empty vessels upon which their wills might be imposed. I can see where you're going with the replication aspect, however, in context, this entity didn't appear to want to impose its will upon empty vessels - it wanted to eliminate the vessels entirely to make room for more of itself; to replace, rather than to control.
Hence, I don't really see the Jew connection there.
I'm afraid that's where we're going to lose connection, unfortunately, because I don't believe that; or at least, I don't think it matters even if it were true… Because I don't believe in 'Satan', nor any other nefarious supernatural force behind the Jews' action - I think they're just espousing a successful (albeit, from a moralistic perspective, evil; from a naturalistic perspective, insidious) evolutionary social survival strategy. Much as a leech, a botfly, a chigger (truly disgusting, btw), a cuckoo, or any other parasitic lifeform espousing similar strategies, I don't think there's moralistic 'evil' there, necessarily.
As you said, evolution selects for improvement, but its not an objective thing - its improvement within the context of the environment, expansive as that terminology can be framed. As such, what might from a moralist view be righteously defined as 'evil' can, if the circumstances dictate such, be evolutionary fitness-positive, can be a contextual improvement.
This mind-control angle is very interesting though, given I've been fascinated as of late with the concept of memetic pathogens, a meme-virus of sorts. It seems you're suggesting the Jews are employing, backed by supernatural powers, some sort of memetic pathogen to impose their will - or rather, the will of this supernatural backer, 'Satan' as it were - upon others, thus acting in a pseudo-replicative manner to expand its own material existence. Its a fascinating idea… I don't know that I think its transpiring, at least not in those terms, but fascinating conceptually all the same.
Well, at least we know your abhorrence for race-mixing and beastiality/dendrophilia is functioning as it should be.