The FLNC. How to not end up like the Corsicans

The FLNC or the National Liberation Front for Corsica is a nationalist terrorist organization that seeks the independence for the people of Corsica from France. They began their operations against the French government in the 1970s and their struggle continues to this day. Based on the standard analysis of terrorist activities, they did almost everything correct. They attacked military and economic targets. They struck both targets in the area they seek to liberate and in the French mainland and capital. They managed to keep up a consistent level of pressure against the French government. Etcetera.

During their active period, they conducted an impressive number of attacks against the French government. Once, on 19 August 1982, they carried out almost 100 attacks on government and economic targets in only one night. They also were notable for attacking police barracks and military bases. Once they even took over and sabotaged a NATO radar station. They maintained a low level of bombings and assassinations throughout the 2000s, but in 2014 they declared a ceasefire under the pretense of allowing the recently elected "Corsican nationalists" to negotiate the independence of Corsica peacefully. However this ceasefire seems to be only a temporary period as they refuse to disarm. Indeed they have continued to issue threats against Islamists on the island, threatening to retaliate with brutal force if ISIS carries out an attack against Corsicans.

One problem that has often plagued revolutionary organizations is the problem of D&C. During the 1970s the FLNC was split up into several different, hostile factions. This is a recurring problem for nationalists that we should learn from. If we began our own revolutionary campaigns, we would be facing the same problems of disunity. Even more so when compared to the FLNC. In fact, many revolutionary guerilla movements end up fighting each other more than the government. This is how the Jews expect to defeat us.
One other problem that I think neutered the FLNC was that their desire to force the government to negotiate with them rather than overthrow the entire system. I have had several threads on the subject of European nationalist terrorist groups (one of which was deleted by the mods) detailing the ETA, the IRA, and now the FLNC and the main reason why they failed to achieve their political goals is that they set out with the goal of forcing the systems they opposed to negotiate with them rather than overthrowing them.

Again, I like to draw parallels with the book many of us have read; the Turner Diaries. In it, the Organization did not seek negotiation with the System but complete and total revolution. The FLNC waged asymmetrical war with the French government in the hope of forcing it to negotiate with them. The Bolshevik communi$ts waged their war against their enemy with the express goal of totally overthrowing it.

Yet obviously we are not Ed Turner and this is not a fantasy. This is real life and we stand to learn far more from the failures and successes of organizations like the FLNC or the ETA than by reading a fictional account of an imaginary war.

Please share your thoughts on asymmetrical revolution. Am I wrong? Was the FLNC correct? Why is Corsica not independent? Is forcing the system to negotiate a logical course of action? And most importantly, how do we prevent the Jews from splitting us up and forcing us to fight each other?
And for the fbi monitoring this, remember, this is all merely hypothetical larping ;-)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committees_of_safety_(American_Revolution)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_Hipercor_bombing
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

excellent thread, this is why nationalist movements should not seek power through terrorism but rather by starting their own government with it's own laws and army. Take a look at some random terrorist organisations, their goals and how well they're doing at reaching them, and you will see that they can fight for decades without getting what they want. IRA, ETA and FLNC fight the wrong way, they expect to find a diplomatic solution when they are the ones that get physical . Compare it to ISIS, they were a lot more successful in laying the groundwork for their eventual goal, at least a few years ago. Off course they got help from ZOG and all that but on the frontlines it were retarded raghead goatfuckers that expanded the caliphate. The reason they were so successful was that they actually fought for their goal, instead of committing an atrocity and hoping it would bring them sympathy. They had a somewhat functional government system, a propaganda machine that even published magazines and they had a cool image amongst youngsters for some reason which was very successful in growing the army. after they had reached their base goal, the attacks on paris and nice really began.
TL;DR don't try to compromise when finding ways to reach your goals as a nationalist, it is either through blood and iron or by paperwork, there is no compromising the two

OP, totally a faggot.
Now with that out of the way, can we meme the Corsica Brigade to victory? They're cool, unlike the french. FRACTURE FRANCIA!

Only tangentially related, but I learned recently about the Committees of Safety during the American colonial period. It's worth a read.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committees_of_safety_(American_Revolution)

These were quasi-government entities that on the surface were there to enforce non-importation regulations. Functionally, they became a shadow government within the colonies that metamorphosed into the later ruling government.

For ordinary people, they were community forums where personal loyalties were revealed, tested, and occasionally punished. … Serving on committees of safety … was certainly not an activity for the faint of heart. The members of these groups exposed ideological dissenters, usually people well-known in the communities in which they lived. Although the committees attempted as best they could to avoid physical violence, they administered revolutionary justice as they alone defined it. They worked out their own investigative procedures, interrogated people suspected of undermining the American cause, and meted out punishments they deemed appropriate to the crimes. By mid-1775 the committees increasingly busied themselves with identifying, denouncing, and shunning political offenders. By demanding that enemies receive "civil excommunication" – the chilling words of a North Carolina committee – these groups silenced critics without sparking the kind of bloodbath that has characterized so many other insurgencies throughout the world.

These committees are strikingly similar to modern NGOs and non-profits like the ACLU, Clinton Foundation, etc. which, while not being officially a state institution, has much of the power of government with zero accountability. Personally, I think NGOs staffed by nationalists could recreate some of the success these committees had during our revolution.

Here's my favorite quote about them:
In 1775, the royal governor of Georgia "noted in astonishment that the committee in control of Savannah consisted of 'a Parcel of the Lowest People, chiefly carpenters, shoemakers, Blacksmiths etc with a Jew at their head."

Really makes you think . . .

I think that any nationalist movement in the US is desperately in need of some effective central leadership. I don't even need to remind anyone here of the shortcomings of our current celebrity-nationalists in the US. I think before you can even approach a useful discussion of asymmetric warfare with a kinetic element, OP, some much more fundamental problems need to be solved:

-Basic organization: hierarchical? cellular? massively distributed? crypto-tetrahedral (see The Moon is a Harsh Mistress)?

-How do you acquire resources? Business? Stock? Good old fashioned banditry?

-What's the fundamental ideology? (this isn't as obvious as it seems)

-How are human resources managed? Vanguardism? Mass outreach? Big tent? Based-Jews welcome?

Posing with guns and being a tough guy is definitely fun, but the risks it entails should be balanced with achieving some useful objective.

That's because they're not brave enough to ween themselves from the French welfare tit. Some separatists they are.

A very good observation. One I agree with completely. It reminds me of Golden Dawn. They too are a sort of NGO that gives services directly to the people, circumventing the corrupt and incompetent government.

Expounding upon your comment, clearly the current nationalist celebrities are not capable of serving as leaders in any revolutionary struggle. Or rather, they do not appear to be made of the stuff we'd need. As I stated before, Golden Dawn should be our goal before anything else. I agree with 's analysis in the sense that I picture a pro-White organization that sort of takes over physical areas and provides services not in the way ISIS does but in the way Golden Dawn does. The Alt right, in moving towards occupying physical space as they did in Charlotte is a good start. This should be pushed further.

As for your detailed questions;
There are many things to be said of all your suggested organizational structures. Cellular runs the risk of fracturing and did-coordination ala the IRA. Personally, as a fascist, I am naturally drawn to the idea of a hierarchy in organization. I wish that WLP was here and younger so he could lead us. His death was a great loss.

I strongly disapprove of banditry. While there are many examples of revolutionary organizations that resorted to banditry succeeding in their struggle (ala Mao, Ho Chi Min, and even George Washington) it also runs the risk of alienating the public and destroying our morale. Remember the lesson of the Shining Path or FARC. They grew so accustomed to banditry that they ceased being revolutionary organizations and became glorified gangs.

As for ideology, each ideology must be tailored to the country the revolution is taking place in. ie no Swastikas and German words in America. This is America and in America we speak English.

As for HR, obviously Jews are not welcome. And my analysis of revolutionary organizations is that big tent ideologies tend not to succeed. However, exclusionary ideologies also fail. In otherwords, we must not compromise our core values but purity spiraling is also dangerous. Why? Ask the the FLNC-UC, or the FLNC-1976, or the FLNC-22 October, or the True-IRA, or one of the many other groups that split off from and fought with their parent organization over some ridiculous small disagreement in ideology. It would be tragic if instead of fighting the Jews, nationalist capitalists and nationalist socialists blew each other up instead.

One thing that I do not know but really want to find out is how the FLNC and other clandestine organizations go about vetting people who want to join. On the one hand, recruiting new members is vital for the continuation of the organization. On the other, the risk of compromising your organization grows with every recruit.

Same way everyone does. You create front groups for the normies, and hand pick the best, brightest, and most loyal and driven operatives into the fold.

ETA got denied the diplomatic means every time they tried to by the Spanish government.
Why?
Because it was useful for the government to have a boogeyman terrorist organization to control the populace.
If you watch the movie "El Lobo" you'll se that at a point the whole terrorist organization could have been wiped out but the governent had other interests.

Do you think that this denial to negotiate with them helped stymie their political aspirations?

In part. If the negotiations happened publicly the country would have seen the reasons behind what they were doing, and that they were human after all, the governent didn't want that, they only wanted to keep the image of them hating everything not Basque and that they were a bunch of senseless bloodthirsty terrorists that wanted to kill you for being spanish and nothing more.
There was once a huge shitstorm surrounding a Catalunian politician, Carod Rovira, who went out of his way to ask them to not bimb Catalunia, and ETA delivered, they didn't plant a single bomb in Catalunia after the meeting, showing that you could negotiate with them, but the government press focused on demonizing Carod for achieving peace for his region.
The political stall also bought more time for the government to focus on dismantling the entire network, all their press outlets were illegalized and seized, their ways of getting money were also cut.
There's also the fact that they were being used as an excuse to keep the country afraid and under the "good government that's here to protect you".
But what ultimately stopped this madness was the strong anti-terrorist section that the government built with the secret service hidden on every damned corner of the Basque Country, they managed to capture many and kill many others, they found a lot of weapon stashes hidden in holes on the mountains. Now we have one of the last political splinters gaining some ground on the Basque Country but I suspect that they've been culled and they are nothing more than controlled opposition.

I have to add, this article shows the tipping point:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_Hipercor_bombing
But there's an interesting thing on it:


I think that this is the point where ETA lost any chance of achieving their political aspirations as it helped form the civilian opinion of them being the bad guys forever.
But I also think that the police and the government let the people die to get to their goal.

That bums me out a bit. Once I had filet mignon at a Basque restaurant in NV, and it was the best thing I have ever eaten in my entire life. Basques have ever since been in my good books.


Golden Dawn appears to be a pretty effective model, but I'm not sure how well the pattern could be repeated here. The legal landscape is a lot difference between the US and Greece.

You mentioned Dr. Pierce, and I think one of the important lessons of NA is that he had a workable financial model that allowed his propaganda efforts to succeed. I listened to an interview with him where he stated that the NA had bought significant positions in publicly traded companies to push back affirmative action and policies that hurt white employment. Now, I don't think we could buy up a defunct punk-rock record label like he did, but there may be some alternatives out there.

Here's an idea: What about trying to roll up the disparate nationalist youtube e-celebs under a single media company? You'd need a little bit of seed capital to get rolling and hire a few audio and visual engineers like the OmniPhi Media kid to get started. The e-celebs get discounted professional engineering and editing (which most of them badly need), and your umbrella organization gets a share of their revenue to use for other things.

Also, at some point, starting or becoming attached to a 501c3, like a religious institution will be a huge advantage. Not so long ago, the National Commission on Hispanic Affairs was a charity run by the Episcopal Church and employed William Morales, a domestic terrorist and bomb-maker. Marxist terrorism in the US has been totally memory-holed, but churches and charities have been essential to raising money and shielding their actions. This even goes on today. Check out your local #Resistance meetups. You're going to see a lot of Unitarian and big-box churches hosting them. Nothing changes. I'm a bit cynical, but I suspect that most churches and charities are glorified money-laundering rackets. Redpilling a high-level administrator at some church could really up your game.

I know I'm writing a damn novel here, but I think the importance of securing funding can't be overstated, and I didn't see it mentioned in your response.


This is why anybody here anxious to get things done really should be involved with the local Republican Party to redpill and vet good, capable people.

==Focus on this== - create a Redpill Wiki and a Cartoon-defacement central

Has any independance movement ever succeeded without the support of the majority of the populace? And i'm not talking about colonies willfully relinquished.


The IRA did move into diplomacy though. It's now the Sinn Fein party.

I'm not aware of any. Please see Che Guevara and the Foci method for an excellent cautionary tale about this subject.

These fucking threads where some autistic, teenage American virgin manlet reads something then comes running here to sperg about it… Larp elsewhere gay boy. You aren't starting or joining shit and you know it.

...

However many CIAniggers and FBIfags show up in this thread there are lessons to be learned from all Fascist organizations. We must learn from past mistakes or be doomed to repeat them.

We are somewhat like kikes, we are everywhere we even have big noses, but we are good people, we don't meddle in other peoples affairs.
There are some good news though, our language is growing and more people use it everyday, at least that's what data is telling us, some moron still think that it's useless to learn a language that's not going to be of use outside of here, but cucks are everywhere, specially in the cities.
Have a picture of my lands.

...

R9K is here. Thanks for the input

This is interesting stuff. It's a shame the mods deleted my ETA thread. You say that the government cut off the ETA's method of funding. What was this and why did the government not cut it off on day one?
I would like to know everything I can glean from nationalist movements that failed. We could all stand to learn from them.


This is a good idea and I will raise it when I meet with some of the leadership in the alt right this summer. Or rather I will suggest more collaboration as I view combining every single one of the often narcissistic nationalist leaders into one organization as unlikely. I always preach unity and collaboration against our enemies.

This is a good idea.

This is also good information for Holla Forumsacks to digest. Many people here ignore the essential aspect of funding. War is essentially a battle of money as much as it is of determination.

Anyway, long posts used to be the norm here. Never apologize for detailed and well thought out posts.

You have struck on a subject I have been hinting at with these threads. The FLNC failed to coerce the majority of Corsicans to at least passively resist the French occupation (not trying to start a brother war. I am simply pointing out how the FLNC would see things. I love the French, m'kay?). I do however admit my ignorance of public sentiment on the ground. From what I've read, most Corsicans don't support the FLNC or even independence. I believe that changing the zeitgeist is critical for any successful rebel organization.

Ah, but that is the tricky part. How to do it when the FLNC or whatever organization in question lacks control of the media? Most Corsicans, like all people in all races, are lemmings who will parrot and support whatever they feel is fashionable. It is the job of any successful asymmetric political organization to shift the zeitgeist in the direction of their desired goal. How the FLNC could do it, I do not know. How we can do it is what is the quintessential theme of these threads.

checked
yeah thats the important part i think for their failure
people are not willing to die and get bombed for corsican independence
i mean, y would you?
its like corsicans are oppressed or aything
probably get forced to learn french language and history in public schools, but aside from the usual stuff of living in france its just fine
i wish they would focus on repelling the invaders instead
they seem to have the manpower and organisation to blow up a refugee camp
but they dont
starting a new government is like a business, you got to offer something people actually want to pay for in taxes and blood

There were two sides to it
The "revolutionary tax":
This was practically extorsion of some of the local businesses where they asked money from the local enterprises, some of them paid it in fear of getting blown up by a bomb, some others paid it beause their ideology but, they still got the mencing letters to not get fucked in the ass by the police if the found out that they were sending money to them.
And there were the bars that sympathizers opened, where most of the benefits went to them, these were harder to find as they had opsec in mind from day one, they also had piggy banks on the bars so people could put some coins towards the cause on a lot of bars/pubs. Sometimes this money was used to pay the bail of some of the incarcerated people (not always terrorists).
There was a time where we were stuck in a loop, We had a protest on a friday, some guys got caught by the police, they were accused of being part of a terrorist group (not always true) and got jailed, the next week we had protests about the guy jailed the last week, some guys got caught and accused of being terrorsts, and you see the pattern here. those were my childhood days, where I couldn't get out of my house on a friday afternoon, because there was a "fiesta" outside.
vid related, this was what I had to see every weekend
ignore the channel title even though we are infested by gommies

Interestingly enough, they recently released a statement (in full battle gear) stating that if ISIS launched an attack against Corsicans, they'd "retaliate"
I regret to say though that there are indeed mosques and a large Mudslime minority on Corsica. I hope one day that French and Corsican, Basque and Spaniard and Catalan, German and Pole, Englishman and Scot and Welshman and Cornishman and Irishman will fight side by side proudly against both the invaders and the snakes that let them in.

I agree. This seems to be the norm for revolutionary organizations. Shame though, I don't see it working in Britain or America just yet. Sorry to hear about your gommunist infection. Spain and countries like it sadden me a little. I know the reasons why, but it just seems like a terrible waste that you have these beautiful cultures relatively unaffected by the cult of White guilt and yet it's filled with leftist filth.

nice posting

every large group WILL be infiltrated, by kikes and their paid shaboos goy

The FLNC is about as much a nationalist organization as the Camora. They're only domestic crime syndicate of France.
It's a very classic Italian peninsula mafia group, fighting mostly to secure drug pipelines (south west route for heroin from Naples) and whose main occupation is racketeering. With backing of the fucking CIA (look up the "french connection" the "french" are all corsicans).

The FNLC bombings have always the same pattern, "pay the protection fee revolutionary taxes or get your business/property blow up".
They never actually attack the government (save a few, known/negotiated to be empty building once in a while) because they know perfectly it will mean the french state will take the kiddy gloves off and throw their asses in jail.
Look up their "political" prisoners you will quickly realize they're all in jail for either:
- Organized crime related offense, typically drug trafficking/racketeering.
- Killing another Corsican over organized crime dispute.

Even their fight against arabs is just that, turf war between drug dealers.

The fact is the weak ass socialists over 20 years ago now caved in and gave them large autonomy and their own parliament.
Parliament that has been DOMINATED by """"nationalists"""" (known FLNC leaders) ever since.
So why don't they seceded? They can do it at literally any time.
Because it would close of their drug pipeline and the french state would stop subsiding their rock.

They're human garbage, if that's your idea of nationalism you should kill yourself OP.

I will address all your angry points.

They're terrorists.

Yes. That's almost always how revolutionary organizations get their funding. "Revolutionary taxes" or by drug trafficking. So either you are very naïve or very stupid to be perturbed by a terrorist organization engaging in non-kosher money raising activities to fund their secessionist aspirations, or you are a kike trying to stir up trouble on this thread. Or both.

That is a lie that any user can quickly look up to disprove, thus further discrediting your shilling here.

No comment necessary. Your feigned or naïve shock over terrorists engaging in illegal activities sends massive Jew signals. Your mind has either been rotted by Jewish propaganda or you are yourself a Jew.

That would certainly be a good argument that terrorism works. Tell Alan Dershowitz and he might hire you on as an adjunct researcher.

Anyway, I am not even trying to be rude even though you came on here to be rude yourself and whine. But I detest Jews and I detest stupidity. Too, I detest shills and I detest ignorance. So I see little reason to be anything other than blunt. Fuck off back to reddit or the JIDF or wherever it is you came from. No one will be fooled by your shilling.

Because most of them are crime syndicate hiding behind a very shallow surface of ideology, not the other way around.


Mhh ok in 45 years of "troubles" how many french "colonial" official died?

2.

Despite tens of thousands of bombings and attacks.

One was a cop that may or may not have been dirty (his car got spread with bullets).
The other was a prefect killed by a split faction of "extremists" dixit the nationalists (that immediately disavowed them).
So you wanna tell me how you BOMB GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS THOUSANDS OF TIMES and never kill anyone?

Answer: Because it's hard to get the government contracts to rebuilt them if you do…

Crime syndicate 101.

I note you never addressed the main points which are:
1) They're backed by the CIA as part of their world network for heroin smuggling.
2) They actually have been given the power to seceded anytime they want. Yet they don't.

The same will be said of any White nationalist organization. Even worse I suspect. The Jews will call us Whites far worse than they have so far. I expect falsified evidence depicting us as rapists and child predators never mind drug distributing criminals.

If you want to play the game of counting bodies, you're an idiot with no understanding of revolutionary struggles.

Because that is intended. You may or may not be a shill. So imagine that you are fighting for a leftist ideology like Marxism. Would you want to rack up a massive death toll? No. Unless you're an idiot. So if you honestly think that revolutionary forces should make it their goal to rack up a massive body count, I suggest you go onto /r/Anarchism and start advising the faggots there because you are about as useful to whatever cause you champion as a kid with down syndrome.

Worse even.

And? They were also backed by Gadhafi. In fact, they owed more allegiance to Gadhafi than to the CIA. Very lame attempt at shilling on your part.

Already addressed. The fact that they're in power (sort of) is actually good evidence that they succeeded. As for why they can't legally secede from a globalist state, use your imagination.

...

I suspected that was how they went about it. Of course just because your family goes way back doesn't make you a trustworthy recruit. Money is a great corruptor.

the fundamental and unquestionable tenant that unifies the nationalists must be an aggressive policy of anti semitism. without that it will degenerate and fracture all over again

This is what I don't get about many terrorist groups with a political goal. How the fuck do they think bombing a supermarket is going to achieve their goal? How many successful indiscriminate bombing campaigns are there? 99 times out of 100 shit like this only gives your enemy an excuse.

Because the Corse and the FLNC doesn't want independence. The FLNC is a mafia, French intelligence organization, whose main interest is to keep the French state's nose, mainland politicians out of Corsica business.


Neither of this orgs had ever the chance or illusion to march on Madrid, London or Paris, they were regional orgs who had a good very tight control of their turf.

The reason the ETA failed was because they lost support of the French state, who used to provided a safe heaven and other support.
The IRA quit because they sensed that international politics has changed, them being at the eclipse of their power tried to trade that in for political power and money.


Such spectacular actions are worthless and counter productive, they are for ego-stroking and showing off, doesn't further the political objective not one bit. First opposing camp can't care less if a small number of their subjects are maimed, the majority will rally around them to seek protection. Second if they happen in the enemies camp they are not going to strengthen control in your turf, if they happen at your place you are going to alienate your own people. Third it opens the possibility for the enemy to falseflag you.

So it can easily decapitated? Central leadership is only viable as long as it out of reach of the government. There could be a clandestine leadership, but that would difficult to keep secret from the oppressors.


Many small, not important cells, different tasked, some overt some clandestine.


Charity, build charitable NGO multiples, leadership and steering committee are organized in a way only the founding member decide about new member, supporters, use of founds. In case it attracted the attention of the kikes, disband it and distribute the founds, build new orgs. No “white power” NatSoc larping, symbolism and related faggotry. There will be no written political statements not in public nor in private.
Your NGO have no superficial connection, don't use the same symbols or names. Core member of different NGO are informal connected.

Political activities are separated by “firewall”, different personal, preferable adhoc actions, nothing they can hook on. Depending on political situation, you might have an official political org, so you can act as an political entity, but the enemy can use this opportunity for a decapitation strike. Keep it separate from your other orgs, open and clandestine ones, they still can act in concert.


Use the founds to support your people, give them jobs in the NGO and money to those in need, no leaches. The NGO is a opportunity to covert funnel money into the cause for business and professionals without attracting attention and with plausible denialability.


Rule a thigh ship for those on the inside, only verified personal but helper are welcome. Inside men policy is to keep undesirable away. If government tries to regulate negro, muslim quotas, disband and regroup in different name and formation.


Poser are not welcome. Even for the USA I would advice strongly against any “show of force”, they don't have anyway. Strength has not to be shown off, either you have it or not. Nonetheless I would suggest to clandestine arm for an internal conflict, build arms caches. There is much more equipment needed than just ammunition and guns.

I would suggest to build an organization modeled after the “Muslim Brotherhood”. They survived and did grown under conditions of strongest repression.

2 bee aich fam, I would say you're right. Any organization that goes for conmplete overthrow of a system rather than mere negotiation will have a better chance of achieving its goal, albeit a much more difficult chance.

However: in doing so, these goals will be made more difficult by the mere fact that the hostile government will feel more under threat. Many terrorist groups have operated for years purely because they said they want to achieve certain goals; the government in question did not feel threatened by this and was happy to hold them off for however long it took to hunt down the members/for the members to get bored/die of old age. Organizations which existed with the explicit goal of overthrowing and destroying existing power structures though?

Well, that's quite a different matter. Governments will fight to the death against such things if they become viable threats, even if it means destroying the country they reside in, the very prize itself. A government is much like an animal in that it will fight to the death when there is a genuine threat against its life.

We need to be going for latter, because what it is at stake here is our own lives, our own future. If we don't stand up now, our entire bloodline is finished. Our people is extinguished.

Government can be utterly unchanging by the nature of the jewish people within it. A people cannot be unchanging due to the nature of the jewish people ruling it. We must make our decisions, and we must make them soon.

We have nothing to lose in the face of a brown planet. ZOG has everything to lose.

That is the reason you first build your network in stealth and avoid detection by the authorities, by not sperging out as terror commando.

I've read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress but never understood how you could stand up such an organization WITHOUT having (like in the book) a sympathetic AI supercomputer who manages the whole organization in secret.

tet