33 y/o redpilled woman vs 20 y/o blue pilled teen

So.. That's my dilemma right now.

1: Got few cocks, want to make family, Redpilled on racial and political problems. Parents got a farm, likes to ride horses and garden.

2: Got to teach her everything. Has shitskin friends, is a city girl, watchs real TV, plays on her Iphone and "muh poor syrian gased babies"
But is 10/10 QT.

I'm 34 btw

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14501183/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

33 y/o and have babies ASAP.

Fuck that young trash. Won't work.

#2 shouldn't reproduce. Neither should you for considering it.

I sincerely hope you weaponise the autism you spawn and harness the tard rage also.

Teens are dumb and brainwashed, it's a bit long but you usually manage to redpill them quite a bit

Yea, leave the young one for the newfags. Wherever they go, they must also rape.

How about you just kys you blogposter filth.

Someone like that won't take the instruction. She'll eventually realize she's holding all the keys and she'll just bail after she's got whatever she can from you.

The 33 year old. If you marry for looks and sex one day when you come home either she or your kids will be fucking a nig.

If the 33 year old masonic female is really red pilled then she probably wants kids and has the highest potential. The problem is her age is reaching the upper limits where you might have one out of 7 kids coming out a little fuckered. Assuming she'll have to be on her back in a bed for the next 7 years. After that its over.

If she's unable or unwilling to go beyond two then you can always use the 20 year old as your mistress to even out your private death squad.