So I started reading Alexander Dungin's The Fourth Political theory

So I started reading Alexander Dungin's The Fourth Political theory
Last night I did the first two chapters. its very undialectical but very inflamatory

He is right that we need new ideas in the battlefield of postmodernity but the ideas that he does personally suggests make no sense, he says that we should go for tradition and religion just because they're against postliberalism and doesn't explain any further or offers a framework to reconciliate them with socialism.

Will you guys be interested if I update you all as I read along?

Other urls found in this thread:

arctogaia.com/public/eng-teor.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Sure, why not. Maybe we get a nazbol shitstorm if we're lucky

Yes, i'm kind of interested in this whole socialism and tradition stuff, it's very stupid but i'm interested

My hatred for traditional culture and dogmatic catholicized religion will never be healed

restrictions to freedom of markets are an obstacle to this profit. This
includes state, national, confessional, and other divisions. Fascism, which
misunderstood its own essence as far as the necessity to combine nationalism
specifically with socialism, fell victim to this monstrous, unforgivable
delusion. Nationalism cannot be market-based or liberal. This ideology
appeals to immaterial, collective, supereconomic life. Communal life is both
at the center of nationalism and at the center of socialism. Capitalism is
based on a radically different, irreconcilable position, the concept of
material profit, effectiveness, rationalization of the present, momentary,
objective world. Let us remember that early national-socialism was based on
a radically socialist, rigidly anti-bourgeois concept of Ernst Junger, the
Laborer, Der Arbeiter.
But it is completely unnecessary to constantly turn to German and
Italian experience. Contemporary Russian nationalism must rethink its own
historical experience. And, given a proper approach, it will become obvious
to us that the Soviet order, bolshevism, was indeed a consistent, finalized,
perfected expression of radical Russian national tendencies in the conditions
of a terrible and paradoxical twentieth century. Bolshevism in its very
essence, its deepest logic, its spirit was none other than
national-bolshevism. If we take a close look at the history of the Communist
Party, we will instantly see that no abstract internationalism ever existed
in its ranks. Ever since the times of the populists, "internationalism" was
understood to be an all-Eurasian, imperial, socialist nationalism, which
completely coincides with the universal, world-historical mission of the
Russian people, as a people carrying not so much the principle of blood,
ethnicity, but the principle of special spiritual and cultural ideal.
Russian nationalism has always been integrationist, superethnical, ethical,
and messianic. Not racial, not regionalistic, not local. Just like bolshevism.

You have never encountered either

I live in a society where these 2 things kill any hope for dismantling the theocratic mafia rule monarchy
I live in some place where " divine right of kings" is still believed to be true trust me i know a lot about these 2 things

Thailand?

It is pretty much the only way that life is worth living. Life in the leftist utopia is meaningless. I would probably become a school shooter under communism just for the lulz.

Communism would have a lot of the same social problems we see today, only amplified a thousand times. It would be a nightmare. More feminism, more obesity, more ugliness, more trannies. Most people need a boot on their neck to make them human. Otherwise they revert to being worthless.

morrocco?