On counter movements

On counter movements and controlled opposition
or
Mistakes never to be repeated

The split between Holla Forums and the alt-kike is plain and acknowledged by all. It is also apparent that they, the generic edgy conservative movement, are the accepted mainstream opposition to the leftists. However, what may not be as well known is that such a boring, spineless movement has a very clear historical analogue. Now obviously circumstances change, but people really don't, so let's further discuss:

The White Movement of 1917-1923
Not long after the communists started rearing their heads in Russia, a conservative movement rallied to put a stop to their faggotry. Here is an ideological outline straight from (((wikipedia))):

"We're not nazis we just don't want leftists and muslims xD vote republican guys! Just vote the leftists out of power!"

Let's see, civic nationalism, rejecting anti-semitism from the top, united diversity crap, pandering to jews… Essentially, playing by the rules that the Marxists set. Sounding familiar yet?

So we see that they were committed to staying within the established power structures and discouraging any deviation or insurgent organisation. Creating a rather toothless movement which only harks back to the generic "good old days" without providing an adequate energetic counter to the progressive movement.

This next one really makes u think
An inoffensive conservative movement trying it's best not to divide scattered forces, and in doing so not really standing for anything.

And some more information:

Take a look at pic related, from the USA in 1919; they talk about walk-outs, riots… it's all happening. The bolshevism is becoming mainstream, and murders are becoming more prominent too. With all that out the way - what comes next?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/ProtocolsOfZion
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophiocordyceps_unilateralis
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

A final note:
The White movement lost, and they lost hard. The Communists may have had very different ideas on what they'd do after they won, but they had that one goal in mind of achieving victory. Leftists today of all stripes are united in one thing - their hatred of whites. The right as a whole is completely divided between different factions that will not work together, because our starting assumption is not victory, it's something totally different for each faction. Reagan conservatives will not work with paleocons. Paleocons will not work with the alt-right. The alt-kike will not work with white nationalists. White nationalists will not work with literal nazis. Literal nazis will not work with monarchists, and on and on it goes.

Some discussion must be had in order to evade what history teaches us is probably coming, because we cannot survive another 75 years under the status quo, let alone what the leftists have in store for us.

All that's fine and good. What are your suggestions to counter this?

pointing out the problem is fine enough, it's part of discussion.

I think it's a prudent example of what happens when there is an ideological disunity of the sort we are seeing today, so perhaps others will find it illuminating if they weren't already aware.

Mostly I'd like to point out that this is the future of the alt-right. Without sounding like the FBI man, if we have no real-world action to unify a cause, all of this discussion will be to no gain. Many solutions have been posted on Holla Forums before, my point is pretty much to provide a counter-example to those who think that a spectrum of right-wing movements can progressively restore sanity by co-opting each other. History seems to disagree.

They're not united in their hatred of whites, though. They're united in their resentment of people who are unapologetic about their superiority.

The kikes are not good at handling being seen/looked at, so in order to prevent themselves from being rekt because of their wealth, they try to cast some other group as 'the problem' that is siphoning the host populace. Right now, it's white people - and 'men'.

Separating a tribe's women from its men is very effective. If it weren't for both feminism and racial egalitarianism combined, there'd be no issue. They took advantage of white woman's resentment for a black man having more rights than she did. And Christian/egalitarian appeals for slavery or second class citizenship; mostly involving a distaste for racialism because of the Holocaust after WW2. Academia recoiled from racial science.

Holocaust is really the basis for what transformed America.

It doesn't take a lot of perception to work out, even on a subconscious level, that whites are inherently superior. It's mainstream now to laugh at whites. It's also obvious that men are the stronger of the two sexes. A lot of white men aren't unapologetically elitist - they hate their pet white male cucks as much as they hate us. We will always be enemy #1 of the jew and his lackeys now sent at us from multiple sides.

Additionally, the 20th century in general was the devils century. Communism, the federal reserve, Versailles treaty, world wars, jewish infiltration, nuclear warfare, you name it, the worst of history has happened within living memory.

The Jews and bankers are fighting for survival.

The logic of natural selection is pretty simple:
You oust a people, declare them as 'other'.
Once they are 'other', they're open to warfare/attack.
Warfare/attack means they die.

Men of other races don't have an issue with this. They are fine dying for their country and dying for the human race's advancement, so long as it is a death they're satisfied with.

A Jew has no criteria for being satisfied with death. It chooses life, at any cost.

There's plenty of real-world actions by different right-wing factions. There are several world leaders who, in the general sense, share our ideology. Even if he betrays us at the end, Trump getting elected on Candidate Trump platform is a major sign that white people are waking up to all the kikery, and they've had enough.

I agree that unity is necessary, and I think it can be achieved slowly, by spreading the truth. As long as we stand with the truth, we cannot be defeated, at worst we can be slowed down. I'd like things to happen faster, but violence rarely leads to stability. If we can win the war for white people's hearts over anything else, we will have won for good.

I don't think the solution is PR cucking, because that just provides a whinging platform for the cucks to say 'buuutttt muh voting. muh civic nationalism. if only kikes will listen. kikes will listen!'

The enemy being fought cannot be reasoned with. History proves this.