Lex viribus, a code of "white sharia"

Because Anglin and his crew keep talking about setting rules for how men and women interact, but no one has yet composed a code of such rules, I offer the following for commentary. Is this what they might mean by "white sharia"?

1. An individual’s gender is defined genetically at conception and phenotypically at birth: men have an X and a Y chromosome at conception and are born with male sexual organs, whereas women have two X chromosomes at conception and are born with female sexual organs. All other categories of people, such as people with Turner syndrome (who have one X chromosome at conception) or hermaphrodites, are considered to be intersex.

2. Ostracism, as described below, can include being expelled from one’s community, losing the right to marry, adopt children, hold public office or immigrate, being recorded in a public register, or requiring one to wear a mark on one’s body, one’s clothing or in places denoting one’s identity such as on identity cards and next to one’s name (if stated) on social media accounts.

3. Women shall not enjoy the right to vote or hold public office. The fate of women who attempt to do this shall be ostracism.

4. Women shall not enjoy the right to take part in the army as a combatant. Women who attempt to do this shall be discharged immediatedly if they have succeeded in enlisting or being transferred to a combatant role, and any who contributed to their enlistment or transfer while aware of their female status shall likewise be discharged.

5. Women shall not take any position of authority over adult men and women, for example as an employer or manager, or the shareholder of a publicly traded company. Women may nevertheless start their own businesses and jointly own organizations so long as they have no authority, direct or indirect, over any of their staff, in which case they can rely on a public agency, which they may not afterwards dismiss save when it has violated its own charter, to oversee their staff. The fate of women who attempt to hold a position of authority over adults shall be ostracism along with a fine or imprisonment.

6. If ever a woman incites people against a man, unless that man has committed a crime, and if these people engage in criminal action against that man, the woman must suffer the same criminal penalty as the people who had engaged in the criminal action themselves. Crying or otherwise showing sadness or a similar emotion to these people, such that these people reasonably believe that the man in question has provoked the emotion, counts as incitement.

7. Marriage is a union between one adult man and one adult woman, wherein the man rules over the woman. If a woman seeks to gain authority over her husband in a marriage, she is to suffer ostracism and her effort to gain authority is grounds for at-fault divorce.

8. A woman below the age of geriatric birth may only be married with the explicit permission of her father (or guardian), stated at the wedding. Any wedding involving such a woman carried out without this permission is forbidden. The age of geriatric birth is to be no lower than 35 years, and is defined as the age at which any child born from the woman is significantly likely to carry genetic defects such as Down syndrome owing to the mother’s advanced aging process.

9. If a woman’s father (or guardian) is deceased, the community must appoint a guardian from among people of good moral character who will have the same rights over her with regards to marriage as her father.

10. If the woman at any time does not consider her father or guardian fit for this purpose, such as because of him having an ill moral character, she may instruct the community to have it elect a new guardian for her in the father’s place.

(cont.)

11. At any time, the woman may reject her appointed guardian as an authority over her marriage, and thus temporarily forfeit her marriage rights. If the father or appointed guardian is proven to be of unsound moral character, or if the woman later accepts that guardian’s authority over her marriage, this restores her marriage rights. Three years after the initial rejection of a guardian’s authority, a woman may request that the community appoint her a new guardian from among people who were never before appointed to be her guardians, and whose family members were never likewise appointed.

12. If the father or guardian of a woman is proven to be of ill moral character, any prospective husband may request to the community that a new gurdian be appointed.

13. If a woman below the age of geriatric birth attempts to influence the marriage decision of her father or guardian by any means other than those described above, she is to suffer ostracism.

14. If any person attempts to intimidate, coerce or employ deception in acquiring the consent of a woman’s father or guardian for marrying the woman to a man, the fate of this person shall be ostracism and imprisonment.

15. The fate of all those who have consensual intercourse outside of wedlock shall be ostracism and a fine. If the intercourse leads to childbirth, and the two sexual partners, man and woman, are found to be of otherwise good character, they must undergo forced marriage, unless either of the partners is forbidden from marrying the other or is shown in court to have ill moral character, in which case that partner shall lose all rights pertaining to the child in question and suffer imprisonment.

16. The fate of all those who commit rape shall be ostracism and imprisonment. If the rape results in the conception of a child, the rapist shall lose all rights pertaining to that child. The rape of one’s spouse is grounds for at-fault divorce.

17. The fate of all those who engage in consensual sexual perversion is ostracism and a fine.

18. The fate of all those who engage in non-consensual sexual perversion, such as bestiality and necrophilia, is ostracism and imprisonment.

19. The fate of all those who commit child sexual abuse shall be ostracism and lifelong imprisonment, without any luxury, without any comfort provided by the authorities, and without any possiblity of release. It is forbidden for such people to marry and to conceive new children, be it through intercourse or artificial methods, and upon sentencing they lose all their rights to their children. The justification for the lack of a death penalty for this crime is the possibility of the sentenced individual’s innocence.

20. Any act of sexual perversion, whether successful or attempted, is grounds for at-fault divorce, the quantitative fault being dependent on the severity of the act.

(cont.)

21. The fate of those who perform sexual acts in public, or who perform them in full view of a bystander who has a fair reason to be present, shall be ostracism and a fine.

22. The fate of those who engage in indecent displays shall be ostracism and a fine.

23. Interracial intercourse, marriage and adoption are to be declared forbidden by the state and/or local authority within its own jurisdiction when the most populous race within the country comprises less than 90% of the country’s total population. Any penalties incurred by these acts or attempts at these acts, such as ostracism, fines and imprisonments, may only be delivered if the acts take place at least
one month after the acts are declared forbidden, so that the public has time to be notified of the legal decision.

24. The local community may legally forbid interracial marriage at any time.

25. Violence towards one’s husband, aside from carrying the normal criminal penalty, is grounds for at-fault divorce.

26. Spanking one’s wife, which is defined as striking her on the lower back, buttocks or thighs without causing injury or leaving a mark, does not count as a criminal act of violence against her.

27. In instances of no-fault divorce, the man’s property and the woman’s shall be at the discretion of the man. In such instances, the man likewise decides how child custody is to be split, and may make adjustments to these arrangements at any time.

28. In instances of at-fault divorce, if one of the parties is found to have no fault, the property of both parties shall be at the discretion of the party without fault, and the party without fault shall decide how child custody is to be split. If both parties are at fault, each party shall receive a “divorce share” score equal to their spouse’s total fault divded by the total fault of both spouses. Each party is allowed to keep a fraction of the propriety equal to their divorce share, and have the right to live with their children for a fraction of each week equal to their divorce share, unless either party’s rights to their children have been forfeit, in which case the children will go to any party whose rights over the children remain, or to the state if no party has rights to their children.

29. The fate of those who use intimidation or coercion for the sake of preventing divorce shall be ostracism and imprisonment. If a spouse commits such an act, the act itself is grounds for at-fault divorce.

30. Willfully denying intercourse to one’s spouse for a period of a month or more, where the spouse does not have a demonstrably ill moral character, a hideous appearance or a sexually transmitted disease, and where intercourse is highly unlikely to cause injury, is grounds for at-fault divorce so long as the partner denying intercourse has no grounds for at-fault divorce themselves.

31. The fate of adulterers shall be ostracism and imprisonment. Their action is grounds for at-fault divorce. If any children have been conceived as a result of the adultery, both the father and mother lose their rights to these children.

32. The fate of any person who encourages his or her spouse to commit adultery or by his or her own free will facilitates this adultery shall be ostracism. The action of this person is grounds for at-fault divorce, the quantitative fault being less than that of adultery.

33. The fate of women who commit paternity fraud, wherein they lead a man to believe that a child is his when in fact the child is not, shall be ostracism, imprisonment and the loss of all rights pertaining to the child in question. Paternity fraud is grounds for at-fault divorce.

34. A man who has already had children with one woman must not have consensual intercourse with another, for he is otherwise a polygamist and is jeopardizing the reproductive prospects of other men. The fate of all polygamists and their knowing consorts shall be ostracism and imprisonment.

35. Parallel legal polygamy, where a man has multiple wives at once, is forbidden. Serial legal polygamy, where a man has a new wife after a divorce, if the first wife bore one’s children, is also forbidden.

36. Addiction to alcohol or any other drugs, if it can be shown to be severe enough so as to harm the welfare of a reasonable spouse, child or stepchild, is grounds for at-fault divorce.

37. The commission of any criminal act against one’s spouse, or against one’s own children or stepchildren, is grounds for at-fault divorce, the quantitative fault being commeasurate to the extent of the punishment warranted by the criminal act.

38. The fate of those who commit any criminal act against their own child or stepchild is ostracism and the loss of one’s rights to the child in addition to the criminal penalty.

39. No one may ever intervene to force any man or woman to finance children who are not their own, such as through government welfare.

40. These rules supersede temporal law and the base cravings of self-serving men and women. Those who attempt to subvert these rules shall be ostracized.

I offer the above simply because I am curious how people would perceive these rules, and whether they consider them to match Anglin's views on what "white sharia" might mean. I am not actually encouraging people to adopt them all.

...

The forced White Sharia meme is for cucky /r9k/ tier virgins.

jesus dude theres more to a code than putting women back into the kitchen

Have you actually read through it? Most of it is gender-neutral.

Stop trying to normalize the idea of sharia in white societies

White sharia meme is cancer

OP is a kike