/afr/ - afrika general No.1: see the shit flying in a mile away

Didn't it fail because they couldn't secure the funds from congress to pull it off.

If that was the case it explains the stupidity of libertarianism where you can't function with an inept government to make long-term plans for the sake of the populace. I'm sure that and the lack of will really didn't help.

Africans in general hate each other. Establishment of local states did not help, because tribalist hatred got augmented with national hatred. Igbos hated the Bantus since forever, but now there are Nigerian Igbos hating on Cameroonian Bantus twice as hard because of some old grievances.
I am not an expert on Apefrican history, but I've been around the place. Rule of a thumb is that most civilized nogs are those who learned to live alongside Whites peacefully, which largely means Namibians and Botswanians. As for the most hated nogs, Somalis take the cake. A Namibian girl once told me: "If you see a Congolese in the street, cross to the other side. If you see a Nigerian, check your pockets and then cross to the other side. If you see a Somali, run like hell."
You'll be surprised, but there is (was?) a nog gang in Liberia that only waged war while dressed in top-of-the-line Gucci and Armani suits, complete with top hats and canes.

They actually started shipping the nogs out, but then the process got halted, then frozen, then stopped. I do not know the exact details, but I bet my pinky finger there were (((political))) reasons for it.

Checked and saved. Thanks user.

(checked)
Africa sounds like a fun place to be if you're armed, trained and with a few powerful buddies. Complete shit otherwise, however.

It is also a nice place to be if you are rich. Depending on a country, your status can range from untouchable to extremely powerful. But guns and buddies also help - take a look at Bob Denard, who took over the Comoros with his mercs and ruled it for over a decade while living as a king.

...

Gonna post an excellent pasta.

Let Africa Sink

Kim du Toit, May 26, 2002

When it comes to any analysis of the problems facing Africa, Western society, and particularly people from the United States, encounter a logical disconnect that makes clear analysis impossible. That disconnect is the way life is regarded in the West (it's precious, must be protected at all costs etc.), compared to the way life, and death, are regarded in Africa. Let me try to quantify this statement.

In Africa, life is cheap. There are so many ways to die in Africa that death is far more commonplace than in the West. You can die from so many things–snakebite, insect bite, wild animal attack, disease, starvation, food poisoning… the list goes on and on. At one time, crocodiles accounted for more deaths in sub-Saharan Africa than gunfire, for example. Now add the usual human tragedy (murder, assault, warfare and the rest), and you can begin to understand why the life expectancy for an African is low–in fact, horrifyingly low, if you remove White Africans from the statistics (they tend to be more urbanized, and more Western in behavior and outlook). Finally, if you add the horrifying spread of AIDS into the equation, anyone born in sub-Saharan Africa this century will be lucky to reach age forty.

I lived in Africa for over thirty years. Growing up there, I was infused with several African traits–traits which are not common in Western civilization. The almost-casual attitude towards death was one. (Another is a morbid fear of snakes.)

So because of my African background, I am seldom moved at the sight of death, unless it's accidental, or it affects someone close to me. (Death which strikes at strangers, of course, is mostly ignored.) Of my circle of about eighteen or so friends with whom I grew up, and whom I would consider "close", only about ten survive today–and not one of the survivors is over the age of fifty.

Two friends died from stepping on landmines while on Army duty in Namibia. Three died in horrific car accidents (and lest one thinks that this is not confined to Africa, one was caused by a kudu flying through a windshield and impaling the guy through the chest with its hoof–not your everyday traffic accident in, say, Florida). One was bitten by a snake, and died from heart failure. Another also died of heart failure, but he was a hopeless drunkard. Two were shot by muggers. The last went out on his surfboard one day and was never seen again (did I mention that sharks are plentiful off the African coasts and in the major rivers?). My situation is not uncommon in South Africa–and north of the Limpopo River (the border with Zimbabwe), I suspect that others would show worse statistics.

The death toll wasn't just confined to my friends. When I was still living in Johannesburg, the newspaper carried daily stories of people mauled by lions, or attacked by rival tribesmen, or dying from some unspeakable disease (and this was pre-AIDS Africa too) and in general, succumbing to some of Africa's many answers to the population explosion. Add to that the normal death toll from rampant crime, illness, poverty, flood, famine, traffic, and the police, and you'll begin to get the idea.

My favorite African story actually happened after I left the country. An American executive took a job over there, and on his very first day, the newspaper headlines read: "Three Headless Bodies Found".

The next day: "Three Heads Found".

The third day: "Heads Don't Match Bodies".

You can't make this stuff up.

As a result, death is treated more casually by Africans than by Westerners. I, and I suspect most Africans, am completely inured to reports of African suffering, for whatever cause. Drought causes crops to fail, thousands face starvation? Yup, that happened many times while I was growing up. Inter-tribal rivalry and warfare causes wholesale slaughter? Yep, been happening there for millennia, long before Whitey got there. Governments becoming rich and corrupt while their populations starved? Not more than nine or ten of those. In my lifetime, the following tragedies have occurred, causing untold millions of deaths: famine in Biafra, genocide in Rwanda, civil war in Angola, floods in South Africa, famine in Somalia, civil war in Sudan, famine in Ethiopia, floods in Mozambique, wholesale slaughter in Uganda, and tribal warfare in every single country. There are others, but you get the point.

Yes, all this was also true in Europe–maybe a thousand years ago. But not any more. And Europe doesn't teem with crocodiles, ultra-venomous snakes and so on.

The Dutch controlled the floods. All of Europe controls famine–it's non-existent now. Apart from a couple of examples of massive, state-sponsored slaughter (Nazi Germany, Communist Russia), Europe since 1700 doesn't even begin to compare to Africa today. Casual slaughter is another thing altogether–rare in Europe, common in Africa.

More to the point, the West has evolved into a society with a stable system of government, which follows the rule of law, and has respect for the rights and life of the individual–none of which is true in Africa.

Among old Africa hands, we have a saying, usually accompanied by a shrug: "Africa wins again." This is usually said after an incident such as:

a beloved missionary is butchered by his congregation, for no apparent reason

a tribal chief prefers to let his tribe starve to death rather than accepting food from the Red Cross (would mean he wasn't all-powerful, you see)

an entire nation starves to death, while its ruler accumulates wealth in foreign banks

a new government comes into power, promising democracy, free elections etc., provided that the freedom doesn't extend to the other tribe

the other tribe comes to power in a bloody coup, then promptly sets about slaughtering the first tribe

etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam, ad infinitum.

The prognosis is bleak, because none of this mayhem shows any sign of ending. The conclusions are equally bleak, because, quite frankly, there is no answer to Africa's problems, no solution that hasn't been tried before, and failed.

Just go to the CIA World Fact Book, pick any of the African countries (Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Malawi etc.), and compare the statistics to any Western country (eg. Portugal, Italy, Spain, Ireland). The disparities are appalling–and it's going to get worse, not better. It has certainly got worse since 1960, when most African countries achieved independence. We, and by this I mean the West, have tried many ways to help Africa. All such attempts have failed.

1. Charity is no answer. Money simply gets appropriated by the first, or second, or third person to touch it (17 countries saw a decline in real per capita GNP between 1970 and 1999, despite receiving well over $100 billion in World Bank assistance).

2. Food isn't distributed. This happens either because there is no transportation infrastructure (bad), or the local leader deliberately withholds the supplies to starve people into submission (worse).

3. Materiel is broken, stolen or sold off for a fraction of its worth. The result of decades of "foreign aid" has resulted in a continental infrastructure which, if one excludes South Africa, couldn't support Pittsburgh.

Add to this, as I mentioned above, the endless cycle of Nature's little bag of tricks–persistent drought followed by violent flooding, a plethora of animals, reptiles and insects so dangerous that life is already cheap before Man starts playing his little reindeer games with his fellow Man–and what you are left with is: catastrophe.

The inescapable conclusion is simply one of resignation. This goes against the grain of our humanity–we are accustomed to ridding the world of this or that problem (smallpox, polio, whatever), and accepting failure is anathema to us. But, to give a classic African scenario, a polio vaccine won't work if the kids are prevented from getting the vaccine by a venal overlord, or a frightened chieftain, or a lack of roads, or by criminals who steal the vaccine and sell it to someone else. If a cure for AIDS was found tomorrow, and offered to every African nation free of charge, the growth of the disease would scarcely be checked, let alone reversed. Basically, you'd have to try to inoculate as many two-year old children as possible, and write off the two older generations.

So that is the only one response, and it's a brutal one: accept that we are powerless to change Africa, and leave them to sink or swim, by themselves.

It sounds dreadful to say it, but if the entire African continent dissolves into a seething maelstrom of disease, famine and brutality, that's just too damn bad. We have better things to do–sometimes, you just have to say, "Can't do anything about it."

The viciousness, the cruelty, the corruption, the duplicity, the savagery, and the incompetence is endemic to the entire continent, and is so much of an anathema to any right-thinking person that the civilized imagination simply stalls when faced with its ubiquity, and with the enormity of trying to fix it. The Western media shouldn't even bother reporting on it. All that does is arouse our feelings of horror, and the instinctive need to do something, anything–but everything has been tried before, and failed. Everything, of course, except self-reliance.

All we should do is make sure that none of Africa gets transplanted over to the U.S., because the danger to our society is dire if it does. I note that several U.S. churches are attempting to bring groups of African refugees over to the United States, European churches the same for Europe. Mistake. Mark my words, this misplaced charity will turn around and bite us, big time.

Even worse would be to think that the simplicity of Africa holds some kind of answers for Western society: remember "It Takes A Village"? Trust me on this: there is not one thing that Africa can give the West which hasn't been tried before and failed, not one thing that isn't a step backwards, and not one thing which is worse than, or that contradicts, what we have already.

So here's my solution for the African fiasco: a high wall around the whole continent, all the guns and bombs in the world for everyone inside, and at the end, the last one alive should do us all a favor and kill himself.

Inevitably, some Kissingerian realpolitiker is going to argue in favor of intervention, because in the vacuum of Western aid, perhaps the Communist Chinese would step in and increase their influence in the area. There are two reasons why this isn't going to happen.

Firstly, the PRC doesn't have that kind of money to throw around; and secondly, the result of any communist assistance will be precisely the same as if it were Western assistance. For the record, Mozambique and Angola are both communist countries–and both are economic disaster areas. The prognosis for both countries is disastrous–and would be the same for any other African country.

Africa has to heal itself. The West can't help it. Nor should we. The record speaks for itself.

Here is what I know about Liberia
Liberia was a legit attempt at sending slaves back to Africa. For fun, here are some before and after the civil war photos. Rememer, Americans payed for all of this to built. It was a fucking turn-key country! All these nignogs had to do was run it (as opposed to building from scratch through innovation and sacrifice like every other civilized nation) and they couldn't even do that.

Detroit, Haiti, Rio, Liberia - what's the difference?

He's entirely right, and also making me just want to to mercenary there all the more

If you are a burger and have been in the military, write a resume and start sending it to PMC companies. Bonus points if you were something above an ordinary door-kicker. Extra points if you are a qualified field medic. Guaranteed employment if you are a SEAL or a heli pilot.
Me, I'll have to go the hard way and join FFL. My country's military service record would get me laughed out of any employer's door.

Not a burger, not military and most decidedly not a SEAL. I don't think I'll ever actually do something like this, but whenever anons bring it up it just seems like something better than the daily wagecuck slog.

I actually read something about them. Actually it's more like they're dressed in a mix between pimp suits and 19th century wear. Also there's some gangs that wear greaser outfits in the middle of the desert?

That's the reason I'm going to do it. Being a wagecuck is soul-crushing. I'd take the chance of getting shot over wagecuckery any day.

To some of us, getting shot in a war is merely a matter of outsourcing something you were gonna do anyway

I hope they get raped, chopped up, and eaten.
And not necessarily in that order

Yep, that's pretty much a given. Missionaries get ooga booga'd on a regular basis there, especially in rural areas.

topkek

I bet his jaw dropped when both reasons turned out to be untrue over time. Knowing the ant people, their goal isn't to help and "uplift" Africa but to suck the continent dry of resources. I can't for the life of me see the chinks giving aid for aids sake. That would imply they have souls and a moral compass.

Great copypasta user. I enjoyed the read.

Well, we all are wrong occasionally. Apparently, he didn't expect that chinks would get involved with Apefrica for other reasons than to fix it.

GHOST IN THE DARKNESS
2 KILLER LIONS KILLING RAILWAY WORKERS
BLOOD DIAMONDS
AFRICANS BEING AFRICANS
CONGO
TRAVELING TO AFRICA WITH SIGN LANGUAGE GORILLA TO FIND DIAMONDS ATACKED BY HIPPOS AND LEACHES AND BIGGER GORILLAS

AFRICA WOULD BE A GREAT ASSET FOR MAN KIND IF "" REASONS

Top fucking Kek.

To be fair it would have sorta worked if the native Niggers were properly exterminated.

American blacks are superior to all other niggers because they're around 30% white on average. They got BLEACHED hard

Yeah, and yet any black-majority city is still a shithole on par with Africa.

Was he crazy or getting some benfeit from it?

More like on par with South America or the Middle East than Africa.

I realized that naming anything to do with religion could call some trolls, is there a way to delete my post?

Why the hell is that building painted in a cow pattern?

South America in a lot of places is actually very nice to live.

idk, niggers have poor taste?
polite sage

Agree, south america has a few nice spots.

He looks like Revolver Ocelot.
This is my dream, we need more people like him.

He was anything but crazy. He was called "the King of Mercenaries" for a reason. He converted because it was easier to do business that way. When you are negotiating a business deal with Shlomo Shekelgrabstein, it helps a lot when your name is Chaim Noseberg, and it's much easier to convince Kebab al-Explodi to work with you when your name is Said Mustafa Majoub.

Seriously, read up about this guy, he is a legend. Grandfather of 20th century mercenaries. Him and Mike Hoare are the reason why private military companies exist today.

He also hated commies, to boot. Even as a merc, he never worked for pro-communist forces.

My sides.
Is there a recomendation you could give me so I can read more about african mercenaries like this?

How do I make money from this?

Four major books about EO.

Mike Hoare's autobiography. However, keep in mind that he was drunk and had a tendency to over-glorify and exaggerate.

Life of private contractors during and after the Iraq War.

Danke user

Checked that frog, sir.

Bitte sehr.
Also, read up about Danny Roxo. While not a mercenary, he was an extreme badass.

Does anyone know why the fuck the US is in Africa?

For example we all know that the reason we are in the middle east is because of (((our greatest ally))). But why are we in Africa? I just read the vice article in the OP and it makes no sense.
This is the same bullshit reasons that were given to citizens about middle east involvement. We can't possible be in there because we are scared niggers are blowing themselves up.

Is this all to counter China's involvement in Africa? What am I missing here?

Probably. I bet chinks are constantly losing shipments, having "accidents" at their mines and refineries and getting oil field fires for totally no reason.
My bet is on US trying to squeeze China out of Africa to get its hands on resources. With a stubborn warlord or two getting killed in the process for getting in the way. There's nothing else to fight for there, especially with Special Forces.

Nevermind I just searched it and found this:
usinafrica.com/why-is-the-us-in-africa/4565504977
It's 100% about China and the fight for possession of the resources there. The website links to a ton of sources.

Yeah makes sense. Now I know why Michelle Obama was making a big stink about those girls being kidnapped. What a slimy move.

Smart move, tbh. I'd rather have that African oil go to the US than to Chinese ant-people. Or to niggers, for that matter.

Oh, you! You know nigger can't into industry and trade. But yeah I would have to agree.

Hoe kan ek Afrikaans goed leer? Op die Internet, daar is skaars iets vir hierdie taal

http:// www. openlanguages.net/Afrikaans

http:// aspeditions.be/nl-be/book/TAALCU143Y/taalcursus-afrikaans-jana-peeters.htm

Learn Dutch instead

The way I see it you have two options:

1, Leave them to revert back to their natural primitive hunter-gatherer lifestyle. A withdrawal of aid and technology should see this accomplished quite quickly in some countries, others may retain facets of society above that which they possessed before intervention. Others would remain at war for longer but as weaponry and more crucially ammunition dried up it would eventually resemble primal tribal conflict no different to what existed before.

This is preferable; it would be returning Africa to the Africans. However it is a near impossible situation. Just because we pulled out doesn’t mean that other peoples would. We see the Chinese are more than happy to be involved in Africa and even if this is purely for their gain without consideration to the natives it still provides money to them. It still opens them up to trade. It transmutes them into a culture that they can’t function within. So what is the solution to this challenge? Do we block Africa off from the rest of the world by force? To tell the Chinese etc. they simply cannot be involved in the continent at all.

2, To restore Western colonisation and maintain apartheid. Force the Africans to behave whilst educating and caring for them medically. Swiftly putting down any rebel groups that object. We profit from the resources and they live longer lives in stability but as well looked after second-class citizens.

Neither is practically achievable. The second is technically achievable but less preferable (every man deserves to be free in his own homeland) but the usual suspects would never allow it just like they didn’t the first time around.

Africa will remain a mess and in misery, its people have been turned into biological weapons and will be set upon the west.

Never tell the enemy they are making a mistake. But unlike the West as pointed out in a pervious post, The west give humanitarian Aid, whilst China does not. They simply extract the resources and provide little to no assistance to the local economy or infrastructure(perhaps they build roads to the mining sites or something, but arn't building highways within the cities).

I think the best thing would be to get the fuck out of africa any way possible, Not deal with their bullshit. Warn "friendly" white nations to do the same(but they can cuck themselves if they want). Sit back and let it crumble. Given them Humanitarian Aid has only allowed them to reproduce at a even higher rate than ever before. And It's gotten to the point that libshits and race traitors and Christ cucks want to bring them to the west in droves. So We have given them the means to produce way more than they ever could sustain on their own, and then in reflection look and say "oh those poor people, we need to bring them here so they have a chance at a better life". Fuck that, and Fuck Africa. Send our niggers back and cross one big problem off of our list of shit to-do.

Man, i fucked up that green text hard, forgive me

Why would they reproduce a lot?

When resources are scarce people don't produce as many children. Every time Some Peace corp faggot goes over and builds a well(until local warlord comes and destroys it), and teaches these baboons how to make clean drinking water, he teaches them how to get more resources and produce more children. Every time the west sends food, medicine, tech, pallets of cash, it makes it so they can reproduce beyond their societies self-sustaining needs. Think of it like this…You have a wife and 1 child. Working 40 hrs a week, you barely make it by and could not conceive of having another child. Then all of a sudden the government gives you an extra $500 bucks a month because you're "oppressed"(or some stupid bullshit). Now you have the means to have another child. This is not quite a 1=1 metaphor, but it's close enough. Think about how the continent as a whole is starving, because they are too stupid to farm fertile land. In the last century, the west has invented cures for diseases that would normally kill off large chunks of their population. Not to mention we literally give them billions in food every year. Somebodies not starving or dying that would have been without the Wests help. That in turn creates more people alive than weren't, and they reproduce more because of the resources that are available. Basic ecosystem shit really.

That's the white way of thinking. Shitskins don't give a flying fuck about whether or not their children have ample resources, and most likely only have "muh dick" in mind when fucking a niggress. The thought "Can I provide for my spawn I just implanted into this ho?" never enters their mind.
The issue with the west sending resources is that we're keeping them alive long enough to breed, spread their AIDS, then kill each other.
The kicker is, is that the aid the bleeding hearts send only causes more suffering long term than if we allowed them to butcher each other undisturbed, which would be great if not for the increased amount of shitskins.

Like i said though, it wasn't a 1=1 metaphor. I explained that more resources = more babies. Populations have a threshold limited on resources. You can't have 10 kids when you only have food for 3(yes shitskins will have 10 kids, but limited resources will make it so they only have the amount that can be sustained on the resources at hand, be it starvation or disease or murder that limits down those numbers).

Can we meme this?

After all these stories I read about how nogs behave in their natural habitat…how can you not see that it totally boils down to r vs k-selection strategies? After all, these creatures survived for ages on their own but only with the help of westerners the populations just exploded. It seems that africa was a big experiment by whomever set this whole human matrix/truman show into place. After letting it run for centuries now I think it's time to step back and look at the results.
But right as we speak the fucking (((elites))) are importing these fuckers, sourcing from the never-ending supply and setting this former beautiful european continent up for the final destruction. The more I ponder about this, the more it makes me depressed. On the other hand, if it all is just some huge-scale experiment, why even bother. Just let the laws of be nature executed and watch the terror unfold.

I made no points on your metaphor, which was
I touched on your main point, which was basically
Which, I admit, is true when the lives saved by using those resources live long enough to breed, but should we put the same nigger in a scenario where it has access to western resources and one where it doesn't, it will breed the same amount. The difference is how many niglets live on to do the same and raise the volume of the nigger(snow)ball rolling down the hill.

I remember seeing articles floating around Holla Forums about Guineans being buttblasted the chinese can produce the same merchandise they do and sell it for dirt cheap, and some other West African nation's rep saying they wished whites didn't leave them for the Chinese as the latter were just exploiting them while the former at least made life easier for them.

Which is funny because it's money going straight into other niggers' pockets. Though I'm hopeful that once America has its hands firmly grasping Africa, they'll ditch the greatest ally with Stalin-like purges.

Walling off Apefrica would indeed be amazing. However, there is one problem - valuable fauna. Nigs are destroying the continent's animals by the thousands, many species the existence of which we took as a given when growing up are now on the brink of disappearance - elephants, rhinos, cheetahs, lions. At the moment, there are PMCs involved in wildlife protection who simply shoot poachers on sight, but even this does not deter them. And now chinks are joining in, massacring the already rare animals for their shitty magic medicine beliefs.
It is impossible to kill the world's demand for ivory and furs, even by making it illegal. Black markets exist for a reason. Therefore, nigs are to be reduced to 1% of their current population at least for the sake of saving animals. Otherwise, the only things left alive in Africa in just 100 years will be vultures, hyenas and baboons.

I'm surprised they don't think nigger balls extend their lives or something.

...

Just let it all burn. Nature will take care of itself. When there are no currencies, nothing to live for they will have no incentives to kill animals other than for eating. Also consider that when they run out of ammo these lil' nogs will become the weakling that they truly are. Also no gas to power the last few cars that will be able to drive. Or will they be hunting elephants with machetes and running after them?
Jeez, they will have really nothing. No fuel, no ammo, no clean water in most areas, no food, no medical infrastructure. Shouldn't take too long to reach natural equillibrium.

I was watching this documentary about plants the other day by Attenborough and I got legitimately annoyed.
All because of niggers, man.

Maybe said PMCs should shoot their women first. Africans breed like motherfuckers, just remove their spawn points.

What part of "black market" do you not understand? Even if trade with Africa is made illegal, there will still be people who do it covertly and becoming millionaires. Nigs will have all the ammo, fuel and money they need to hunt down and skin the last cheetah because some pampered cunt on the other side of the globe thinks that black and gold looks good with her earrings.
You underestimate the destruction hordes of nigs inflict on wildlife. Notes of White explorers dating to the beginning of Scramble for Africa(!) speak about how "where there used to be thousands of elephant herds, there are none today", and that was only due to Arab ivory trade. Want a more modern picture? Watch Addio Africa, made in the 60's:
youtube.com/watch?v=7K5qVWG5CXU
Pay particular attention to 40:31 and 1:15:20. These nigs kill animals for sustenance because they have bred out of control. In any case, this a must see movie. It even has Mike Hoare's mercs removing watermelon.

PMCs are no longer employed for attack purposes. Many are just glorified security guards today, with strict "do not fire unless fired upon" orders. Other than that, I support your opinion.

I want them all gone. There is no good reason for keeping them alive. I realise that there might be a small minority of them that are less niggerish than the average one and realise that their race is fucked up but if we want to ensure the safety of the entire planet and the future of mankind then we must genocide their entire race, regardless of if there are a few exceptions or not. Same goes for jews of course.

Unrealistic, as much as I want for the same to happen. Even with a full-blown, industrialized genocide, there still will be a bunch hiding in some ass-end of nowhere where no one can even be bothered to go and find them. I'll take the 1%, thank you.
Jews can't survive in remote areas, so exterminating them should be much easier.

The Chinaman's struggles in Africa? All me, Zhong. All of it.

I can't help but feel slightly sorry for this chink. It's really visible from the documentary how close he is to lashing out.

Its been awhile since someone mentioned him.

Shame how much of an unknown figure he is, despite pretty much being IRL Big Boss.

Why are you idiots worried so much about niggers when mexicans are the true menace?

Nigeria, Botswana, Rwanda and Gabon seem to be shitholes with a future at least and I could see them become better if cut off on unnecessary aid and having to find solutions to keep floating asap.

I think it's actually jews that would more easily survive a genocide than niggers, at least kikes look like a lot of different people at once due to their constant racemixing so they could pretend to be arabs or whites, it might work in South-America since people there are too mongrelized to have real defining racial features, in countries like Brazil everything that isn't completely black is seen as white/caucasian.
Niggers on the other hand don't look any other people on earth, the closest thing you could get are dravidians and abbos but they are only similar to them in skin color, they have completely different facial features.

I was gonna make some sort of joke, but realized it actually makes sense

Its people like him the world is lacking. It fucking hurts me inside that I knew someone who spent his youth on the eastern front then the latter half fighting in ever god damned bush war til the 80's when he realized he was getting old and nothing to show for it.

The era of war heroes will soon be at our doorstep again, the problem is that we need Europe to collapse first or else they'll find an European martyr to forcefully integrate everyone into a brown pulp.

How??? Aren't they like barely a million people?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhutanese_Americans

Bhutan wanted to retain the purity of their racial stock and become a homogenous society thus ejected nepali speakers who were put there for some reason hundred years ago. Many fled to the west.

The brits wanted it apparently and brought them in as cheap labour. This reminds me of our own refugees, if we euros ever kick some out will you take them pls?

Why are you saging?

kek

Bumpity bump

That's very noble of them but shit for us and the US.
It's interesting how there's all these little Asian communities that realize that racial purity or at least being clean enough builds more homogeneous communities than dumping nogs in the mix. Even the Chinese realize that. I saw a Chink woman - Basketball American couple with their chinigglets, they looked like they just got out of some horror game. Mestizos at least have some ape-like semblance or get lucky with the genetic lottery, but those Asian niggers were just from a world outside our imagination. I wouldn't be surprised to find a civilization of them in Antarctica.

Am I supposed to believe those chimps captured FALs?

It really is amazing comparing Africa to developed countries. Look at Tokyo or Budapest, or any other non-nigger filled city and compare to places like Liberia and Somalia. HBD really is as fascinating as it is horrifying.

Those are CETME's/G3's, Roxo himself has captured stuff.

From all of these posts, it really seems as if Africa has been the greatest reason why the west is falling. It is a money pit filled with dangerous fauna and flora that excites the imagination and inspires the bold and bloodthirsty. Those great, violent men truly died in vain and left behind lost nations. These are the sorts who would have fought against the government for its own sake. Great in a manner, but only fools.

Africa is the eternal Wild West, and the forever-untamed frontier, dangerous and treacherous no matter how hard you try to conquer it. It is a place where heroes are made. I do not mind it being that way, as long as it does not touch the civilised world with its influence.

B-but general Butt-Naked found Jesus, as he was ripping the heart out of an infant on the warfield…

I find it hilarious how the brain dead libs ate his shit up and started praising him.

I had been thinking about this…

Suppose that someone was to assemble a squad of hundreds of European/American men. Let's say they do not conform to actual army standards, but they have training for insurgent wars and some nice gear to go with it, think 21st century crusaders.
Would they have any chance at capturing a city, enslaving its people and ultimately remove them prom the premise in any African nation? Assuming North Africa is out of the question due to ME relations.

Denard captured the Comoros with just 30 men and barely any shots fired. But that was during the Cold War. Any attempt to create a White ethnostate today will be stopped by the (((international community))) unless there is a strong enough deterrent. Say, like a nuke.

So apparently staging a coup is a lighter offence than drugs or theft.

The trick here is that when overtaking Comoros, Denard toppled a commie dictator. So his punishment was symbolic more than anything.

user, look up Sekou Toure.

I heard that under Haile Selassie in the 1970's Ethiopia was comparable to Japan in the turn of the century. Of course (((communists))) then took over, then after they got overthrown by people who have the exact same ideology and iconography in a typical communist and African power struggle, (((foreign aid))) came in which promoted sloth and laziness and killed any chance of enterprise or any steps toward that direction.

Nowadays toppling a commie would probably just exacerbate it

It might have been a relatively peaceful and orderly place, but it was definitely not prosperous, and it was still populated by low IQ niggers. Now granted, east african niggers are somewhat less "ooga booga muh dik" machete massacre tier than the bantus, but they're still niggers. Look at Somalia.

Selassie, despite being one hell of a tyrant (which is totally normal for Africa), knew what was good for his country (which is not normal for Africa at all). However, he fucked up when the commies came by becoming so draconian in an effort to root them out, that the people started seeing commies as a viable alternative. He also did not know when to admit defeat and quit, thus prolonging red terror instead of trying to win the people back. Then again, foresight among niggers is unheard of, so his situation is hardly surprising.
We need the red scare back, tbh. McCarthyist paranoia was fully justified. Commies need to know that one day a heavy hand will be placed on their shoulder and take them straight to the partyvan. I would love there to be an outlawry edict and an open season declared on them, but I'll settle for baby steps.

(checked)
What about viruses or bacteria? Would that also work?

Well, given that you have no death penalty, would you rather have a prison revolt and escape led by Druggy McDrug or some guy who can topple a government with a little less than a soccer club's players?

The problem is that the Red Scare only promoted future rejection of it. Much like White Scare is being utterly demolished by the youth becoming more traditionalists in a still relatively poz'd world.
We need to think like the Jew if we want to beat him. After all, even though they have all the money and loopholes of the world, if it hadn't been for the Romans they'd still drink their own piss and call it an aqueduct.

Most viruses and bacteria are either not deadly enough to be considered WMDs or not deadly enough without proper deployment. In today's world, a pandemic would be swiftly localized, and even if the enemy does not have a cure, he can always wall off an area and wait the pandemic out. Yeah, you might kill a couple thousand people by airdopping an anthrax container on a city, set to go off in mid-air. Now compare it to the threat of obliterating said city in an eyeblink, killing millions. Or at least detonating a dirty bomb, making the city uninhabitable.
There is a reason why no one fucks militarily with nuclear states anymore and why modern warfare has devolved into proxy wars, border skirmishes and economic sanctions. No one wants to wake up one day to the howl of an air raid siren and the sight of a white trail in the sky moving towards the earth.

You want to know about Africa? You want to know just how fucked it is?

North Africa
East Africa
Saharan Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa
Should I go on?

Please do nigger whisperer

There was also a gang that only fought naked. The general was called General Butt Naked

Ethiopians are definitely the most sane and civilised blacks looking back over a few thousand years especially compared to the animals in Sudan and Somalia. It looked like a pretty nice place to live up til about 1980.

kek I remember that documentary. It was more of very, very disorganized militia doing raids and drugs than a gang.

Some times I wish Europe were like Africa, in that we're just always at war and have a constant baby boom.

Ahh no immigrants and degeneracy

So they are choatic animals. lel

UN need to disband because they are useless however it is getting more antisemitistic. UN is supposed to be a pathway to one world government which will be controlled by the jews and the good goyised animals.

Antislide bump

Where's the charity fund account for the white Africans so I can donate?

bump

Anti-slide because shills are out in full force.

...

Yes, but remember that Amharic is still the dominant ethnicity of Ethiopia today, and unarguably more back then. They speak a Semitic language, unlike their neighbors who speak Cushitic languages.

Please, continue if you can.

Keep on going

Round 2!
West African Coast and what not
Central Africa
Southern Africa comes next!

I might be traveling to the Democratic Republic of Congo in the not-too-distant future for a field research opportunity I got. Any advice on how to safely go about this and make the best of it?

So in terms of food, we have two livestocks, two fish, and a grain. I sense a massive market opportunity for a certain race with centuries of farming in their blood … One day we'll return, soon enough.

Keep believing that shit. Its a nice warm security blanket.

Rwanda, Nigerian, and several other Black nations have actually managed to produce some effective light infantry.

Sierra Leone and Liberia notwithstanding.

Liberia is full of mk ultra'd child abuse sufferers.

they cared about the fertile land and the diamonds but did not give a shit about the people.

and so long as they had what they wanted they could give a shit.

RESULT: TOTAL SHITHOLE.

They have diamonds and mcdonalds branches and banks and other tokens of wealth, however you get five year olds being gang raped and cannibal cults so the country is clearly fucked. however the bbc and stuff keep coming out with stories about how it can be saved.

is gun ownership mandatory in NK too?
NK gives everyone over 17 an AK and 1k rounds?

Dont go.

Bring bodyguards and guns.

Overlay ebola, starvation and current conflicts.

Where in DNC, er DRC are you going to go?

no.

Southern Africa
African Islands
I dont know jack shit about them

I hope this was informational/correct/enjoyable for you all!

thanks

I'll be going to the very north-east portion of the country to a number of isolated villages in the jungle area east of Kisangani but slightly west of the border with Uganda- all of them that were previously recorded as having outbreaks of viral hemorrhagic fevers (that's what I'm doing research on).

I have the money to get one bodyguard who can speak french- but IDK if I can get ahold of a gun myself. Part of the reason this trip was funded was because nobody where I work was willing to go to this region of the country. On a scale of 1-10 how fucked am I?

There are rebel groups in the area, but I've never heard of them kidnapping Westerners. Having a good guide is paramount. One body guard isnt going to do much, and a white man shooting a black man in the middle of -blafrica- no matter what the circumstance, is risky as fuck. Also DO NOT start handing out money or doing pity-charity. All those wide-eyed kids look sad and pitiful, but the moment you start handing shit out for free, you'll have a mob of adults demanding free shit to.
I'd say 6/10 you're playing with fire, but so long as you are polite, nice, and keeping a low profile you should make it out in one piece.
Have an adventure

I heard that the Zambian govt are offering the lands to the farmers in exchange for foods so they can stop importing the foods.

Embed related

Already posted above, posting again. This was filmed in the 1960's.

Any of you ever heard of this town?
It's a whites-only down in South Africa. Its population as been exploding in recent years. It only had around 90 people in 1990, it has over 1300 now.

I have high hopes for this place.

The only problem with that town is that they have chosen a shit-tier place surrounded by arid lands, which means that it expands very slowly.

They've been doing an amazing job at cultivating their current land, though.
I've heard that black South Africans are platinum mad they're not allowed to live there, they want the army sent in to take it over. "Its beauty belongs to the Africans" or something like that.
They don't seem to realise the down was literally built by the whites living there, the scenery planted by them, the houses constructed by them, the roads paved by them. If they left the town would look like every other rundown shithole in the country.

*the town

I heard they didn't take every white, there were a couple bulletpoints - something like entepreneurs or scientists, 120 IQ at least, had to pay 10k dollars membership fee before moving in something like that (?), maybe some boerfag can verify. Then there is a very real problem related to the fact that it's still in south africa. When local king nigger decides it's time to fuck with whitey, this is the first place they'll go. With army and everything if there is any resistance. 1300 whites won't stand long against a rag-tag nigger army, as incompetent as they are, they are still an army.

You are missing my point. This town's existence relies on immigration of Afrikaners and especially Afrikaner families.
Let's say a newlywed couple decides to move in. In order to survive, they need to farm, so they decide to buy a plot of land. But all fertile plots have already been bought by other denizens, so their only option is a dry patch of dirt. In order to make this patch of dirt able to support vegetation, it needs time (at least a year, at most three years) and lots of fertilizer. What is a family supposed to do to sustain themselves in the meantime, chew on leather shoes? Then there's also the factor of droughts and failed crops. Eventually the man will just spit, say "fuck it" and leave for elsewhere.
South Africa is full of lush, fertile land that can serve as fields and pastures, but these guys (mostly hardened, experienced farmers) chose a patch of semi-desert for their home. Their logic eludes me.

I assume it was far away from any major ghettos.
There is probably a reason it is where it is.

I have a suspicion that it was chosen in accordance with the Volkstaat idea, but the Freedom Front, the party currently supporting it, has pretty much pulled the location for it out of their asses.

Also, if you are interested in the history of colonization of Africa, as well as history of South Africa and Rhodesia, read these two books by Martin Meredith. He gives a very neutral, detached and surprisingly unpozzed (for a writer not ostracized by judaized academia) account of events.

Oh fug, epubs are not allowed?
Here are the links, then:
http:// rgho.st/8cL8zFSF2

http:// rgho.st/7wS5k2lMg

...

...

checked
how enslaved can a well armed people be
everyone from 17-70 is armed and on call for duty

The NK of Africa is a stale UN meme to impose sanctions.
when that failed to destroy Eritrea the goal was to strip the country of the youth that was building the country up but making an Eritrean citizenship the gold standard for amnesty in the west.
all that lead to was forgeries.
Eritrea's gov was structured to be nationalistic / representative.
due to the pressures it has redoubled its nationalism but pulled back on its democratic/representative "constitution" (never implemented ) and swung socialistic choosing stability over dynamism.
only country in africa on to achieve the UN's meager "Millennium Development Goals "(MDGs)
no debt to IMF
Kicked out all NGO's
Kicked out un "Peacekeepers" (for being pedos)
growing 9-10% year over year under war, sanctions, and disrespected national rights (boarder dispute)
rebuilt itself from the rubble of 30 years of war

and just turned 26 yesterday

...

We must protect it from the Kaffir onslaught. Claim that hitting one of their women will get angry internet neo nazis to summon Ebola on the tribes that do so.

Looks like a great place to visit!

Bump against the mudshit slide

What a shit hole. Why do non-whites have such a hard time making the place cleaner and safer for their next generations?

Permanent broken window syndrome.

(checked)
It's all due to nigger genetics. They live by the moment and die by second-to-second decisions without noticing that it's the sum of their actions that brought them where they are now. This is mostly seen in how black thieves and thugs seem to think that the system is unfair because in their heads "they dindu nuffin", the need of money and the fact they now have some doesn't take into account when they stole it.

Some other anons had made more specific explanations but this is all I could find.

What the fuck? Where do you think you are? This is SJW-esque reasoning: that it's superior to allow a vast area full of wealth go to waste simply so savages can live short, squalid lives. Do you also think the white europeans should give back North America to the relative handful of people who lived there before we arrived… people who never invented the wheel, metal smelting/refining, domestication of herd animals, etc?

If you think that's a shithole, you ain't seen nothing.

...

...

The people in the second picture look like they are Indian-arabic mixed people.

Op die internet gaan jy fokol kry, leer Nederlands, ons verstaan dit. Soos jy tyd met mense wat Afrikaans praat spandeer sal jy dit baie vinnig op tel.

The reason they chose a arid spot in the middle of nowhere is because the kaffers have no reason to go there. You have to remember that Boere only make up 6% of South Africa's population. Anywhere we build something the kaffers will show up to leach.

The only reason the town is allowed to exist is because of the part of S.A's constitution that guarantees that all the ethnic groups have the right to self-determination. This is a paper thin pretext and the kaffers have near complete control of the parliament and could change it if wanted. The people of Orania are cagey as fuck. They never say anything political because it would draw attention to their town. The kaffers hate the idea of a town existing that is only for Boere, but the town is located far away from any big cities and has nothing that they would want, even the roads leading to Orania are back-roads that no one uses unless they want to go to Orania. The town goes to great lengths not to make waves.

The far-away irrelevance to the location is a defense mechanism, and arid land is fine, we can farm anywhere.

My fear for Orania is that as it expands and improves and becomes more wealthy it will no longer be irrelevant and the kaffers and the (((International Community))) wont leave them alone anymore and things could get bloody. You can already pick up the rumblings of this, there is a interview that one of the founders did where he talks about the journalists that have gone to visit them. He talks about how the European journalists are horrified by the very idea that there is an exclusively white town while they get better reactions from African dignitaries and journalists who visit. I think that when the kaffers turn on Orania the rest of the world are going to spur them on like they did in 1994. All bloodshed and atrocities are going to be ignored and all that will be reported is how horribly racist this white town was.

I really hope things go well for them, I love the town and the people are extremely nice and well mannered, but I see dark clouds in there future.

tl;dr: libcucks and niggers should be hanged.

Thanks for this wonderful post. Good to hear about This town. And fucking awesome the lengths they go to in order to go grey man mode. It shows they are smart as fuck

As many great pains as they go to in order to fly under the radar, I really hope they stop even attempting to talk to (((journalists))). Nothing good comes from the Jew media.

IMO, they should come up with some kiked up reason why they need to be separate. Use kike logic or something. Say the town is there to help rehabilitate victims of domestic violence or something and require strict media blackout procedures.

Once you get on the kikes radar, and they set themselves to purpose regarding destroying you……there's little else to do than to try to GTFO before the nigger golems descend on your area. They should be arming the shit out of themselves secretly. Mortars, rockets, belt fed calibers in the 50 bmg range. God I wish I had connects like a Yuri Orlov or similar so I could help get them some of that stuff. Becuase the niggers won't stay away forever.

> OsTerriveis the complete history of 32 Battalion author's name escapes me
> Africa's Commando's (another history of the RLI) name of author forgotten
> The Saints; History of the RLI. forgot the name of author
There's way more, all of the books I've got my hands on were chalk-full of useful information.

Portuguese m/961's actually.

*southern Sotho, user.

Also

South Africa's land is majority desert, user, unless it's properly cultivated like the Afrikaner cultural towns.

The coptic christian ethiopians actually ruled over their country decently and even beat italy in 1897 but all progress was completely reversed by mudslime commies.

Somaliland is probably the only successful nigger state

Burundi and uganda are truly little prussia. They almost collapsed the DRC with 600 paratroopers.

Not that there was a lot to collapse.

I am fairly sure that user specifically asked about mercenaries. Thanks for the list anyway, I didn't know about some of these books.

who is the idiot who designed that shart

Sorry mate, I just wanted to add my collection. There's too much to just pass by. Even if you come upon propaganda/books from the other side, read that as well; know thy enemy.if you want to understand the landscape and history, you must read as much of these books as humanly possible. There's just no excuse for ignorance anymore especially since our brothers are being slaughtered. By the way, read up especially on 32Bn esp. the complete history I've suggested, you'll be blown away and it will give you a new perspective on the war(s) in Southern Africa. It would also give you more ammo to deal with the idiot leftists who champion Communist Terrorism/Terrorists where/whoever they may be

user, you need to read up on the boers and insurgency tactics for anyone to take this post seriously.

I know, mate. Just got a copy of one of the books you listed, and reading Ian Smith's memoirs at the moment.
32 Battallion were absolute badasses. I fumed with rage when I learned what Whoreson Mandela's government did to them as retired veterans.

Fun Fact: When Tintin In The Congo, a Belgian book criticized for its depiction of the Congolese (the word "juju" is used a lot, for example), was released in the Congo, the Congolese LOVED it.

When asked why, every one of them replied that the book wasn't mocking THEM, it was mocking some other random rival tribe.

I think you have missed the point there, user.

There exists footage of the township at Pomfret being destroyed by moronic ANC supporters. Fullpol's board won't let me upload it because of the file extension, so search for "Pomfret Destruction". Hopefully it's still there.
WARNING:vids related are rage-enducing

user, Can you upload the vid to Mega or archive incase certain (((People))) took it down

I'll just upload it to a new channel dedicated to the wars and conflicts in Southern Africa. I don't do megaarchive or any other bullshit, because I want people to see it all as it is AND I want you to be able to DL it right then and there. Further, I don't trust those sites. By the way, I meant to tell you to search for it on YouTube. Here's the link to the last part of the five-part footage.

thanks user, Gonna Archive the shit out of it incase it gets taken down

Fucking apes.

Don't forget Liberia, in the 1950s they were third only to South Africa and Rhodesia.

Ethiopians have abbo-tier IQ. There might have been some segments of society that were less primitive - pic related is hardly the average nigger - but you can't deny that on the whole niggers are still niggers.

Orania is a farm that has been subdivided into plots, private land so the owner(president of the council) chooses who gets to live there. He never says 'no blacks', he just rejects all black people's applications to live there. They need to tread very carefully because one slipup could lead to a local militia razing the place to the ground

My point exactly. Most ethiopians were and still are abo-tier niggers, but the ruling solomonids and the upper echelons of society managed to reform ethiopia into a half-westernised state, but when the dumb shit commoner took power in the Derg communist coup they fucked it up as all niggers do.

bump

Any information on the island nations near Africa like Madagascar, Sychelles, & São Tomé and Príncipe?

Should I do it?

Malagasys are a genetic mix of nigger and east asian so they're not as bad as mainland niggers, same with Seychelles, don't know much about ST&P

checked

Malay

Hehe The Canadians are colonizing Montana.

...

I don't doubt what you say user, not every african that picks up a gun is going to look like your local crip or blood. Still, if you have any proof or more information on african/black war tactics and readiness it would be much appreciated.

The trick here is that none of the modern African armies has ever tested itself against a non-African opponent. In the 70's, the well-armed, well-equipped and well-trained terrorists were getting so BTFO by Rhodie and Saffa forces it's not even funny. A detachment of RLI could clear out a terrorist camp of 100+ without suffering a single casualty. Hell, even Mike Hoare's ragtag band of mercs were absolutely devastating commie niggers in Katanga.
Niggers can't fight worth shit because they cannot into teamwork and coordination, combat is strictly personal to them. It would be a mistake to assume this changed in just 20 years.

...

...

...

...

Wait, those symbols

...

...

Anti-slide bump

RWanda yes, nigeria no, liberia dunno. Nigeria is so incompetent with it's military, that they can't properly crush boko haram, an enemy that although is more ruthless than Zipra or Zanla, is equally incompetent in terms of use of military tactics.somone downloaded article I found online and reuploaded them in this threadI love it when people are reactive to the info we're spreading and the best part is we're only getting stronger.

Is anyone in the west aware of what's happening in the Northern part of Morocco?
Berbers are protesting en masse and the government arrested their leader because they fear the start of an indepence movement.

It is not painted those are black rocks that are mortared onto a wall and the mortar (border for the black rocks) is white

...

FOR FUCKS SAKE user READ THIS BEFORE YOU DECIDE ON GOING
forum.expeditionportal.com/threads/50799-Democratic-Republic-of-Congo-Lubumbashi-to-Kinshasa

This is the diary of a nice couple from Belgium who decided to do a roadtrip through the Congo in 2010. It's as honest as a portrayal of the Congo as you are going to get. These people aren't racists, they are seasoned travelers, and just want to explore and experience the world. READ THE ENTIRE THREAD

Spoiler alert: By the end of it they are fearing for their lives and regret ever going.

For anyone else in this thread, this is a really fun read. Lots of unbelievable adventures, tales of cannibalism, and fucked situations that can only be experienced in the heart of Africa.

Jews are the best at dealing with niggers ironically. All that blood for gold and diamonds under Jewish hands and of course the slave trade they controlled. Israel is sterlising niggers too. We ought to learn from them before the chinks do.

THINK TWICE ABOUT THAT
Read this travel diary first:
forum.expeditionportal.com/threads/50799-Democratic-Republic-of-Congo-Lubumbashi-to-Kinshasa

A nice couple from Belgium decide they want to go on a road trip from one end of the Congo to the other. They go from blue pill "we are the world - we are the children" people to "war, war never changes" during the course of the trip.

It's a must read for anyone who wants to see how bad it is there. It's hell on earth.

Same user. I thought the first post didn't go through for some reason. Sorry for the double post.

This is a classic. Bunch of two live-and-let-live "world citizens" learning what Africa is like first-hand.

I hope for you that that is true. from what i could gather eritrea dodged a bullet or just ate it from a gun now aiming alittle higher

Any expat stories with the niggers?

Bump

Bump

Bump, this thread is fucking amazing

My sides

www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/chalkfull.html

Don't tell me you have a better solution.

Anti-slide

He was a good example of the older generation. Theygrew up in a prosperous (relative) Congo and have seen it go downhill. They still have the pride every person should have. The younger generation grew up in disastrously f*cked up country and lack the pride. Why should they, they know they do not get any chances?
It is that old generation that longs back to the colonial time. They acknowledge there were a lot of problems in that period and that they were discriminated by the white colonisator. But at least they had a functional country. They had roads and schools. They had jobs and could buy supplies. And above all, there was stability. Now there is nothing but uncertainty.. waiting for the next war to start.
How terrible.

How about a complete embargo of the continent but with a few highly secure free trade cities a la Hong Kong or Singapore with equally brutal punishments.

The dindus can do dindushit all day and real humans can still profit from the natural resources there.

seeing that guy hit himself makes me think it's a natural reflex to try and kill himself

Can you post the last page please

checked
wew, how did i miss this

I gladly would - if I had it.

cant let africa gen get slid

bump

Shithole? Really nigger? Those pictures might be cherry picked, but they look really fucking nice compared to most other parts of Apefrica. I mean, look at the third picture, well-maintained roads. sidewalks, not crowded (especially with nigger beggars), ample floral decoration. Must be due to the caucasoid admixture in the population, but that's a pretty livable country by the looks of it

Bump

It is nicer than a nigger country.

Bump

bump

Bamp

Also let us discuss the Libyan Civil War. I presume, since August, this board has been backing Field Marshal Khalifa Belqasim Haftar and his HOR since he is now backed by Russia, Iran, Egypt and France against the pro-US/NATO GNC, the Pro-Turkish/Qatari GNA, and the Islamic State in Libya?

The US waging war in Africa is them trying to fight China for the continent

Isn't it still one huge free-for-all between rival kebabs? Also, what happened to Gaddafi's daughter who vowed to retake power over the country?

what?!

https:// en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Ayesha_Gaddafi
Never mind, apparently she got BTFO and fled to Algeristan.

got me all excited
well thank you for the new info

droping this here

Utter diversionist nonsense. The plain fact is the House of Saud is absolutely desperate. Oil price remains low, around $50 a barrel. The monster Saudi IPO on Aramco is only 12 months away. The House of Saud needs to move the markets towards a higher oil price by any means necessary – ultimatums and threats of war included.

BLOOD PUMP AND DUMP

sage for off topic

The fuck are you on about?

Old news OP. The US is shitting itself because China has the upper hand. They don't really give a fuck about the kaffs. Unlike whitey, who actually provided with built roads, infrastructure, schools, free healthcare, free education, a competent and honest police force, the chinks do fuck all. The US, UK and now, EU fucked all White Africans over during the 80's when they turned on the last remnant of Whites in Africa (they did so even earlier if you consider the portuguese to be white when they genocided several white controlled portuguese colonies) by supporting the very same people who were being funded and trained by the communists. Fuck all of them, they should be tincupping. Their transgressions against them is coming home to roost with them. There is nothing in Africa besides the soil that remains. Try getting it. The kaffs are not human. It will not be easy. The west is too soft, the chinks are sub-human.

Also, the frenchies. A fucking joke. Half of Africa speaks french (I'm exagerrating) but you can hear and see who speaks french and who doesn't, across multiple African countries. Open borders is literal this side. You can see it by their facial features. They're actually a lot more humane than the non french speaking blacks but just as bad depending on which areas you go to. Overall, a better pick over say, a Xhosa speaker. But big lulz. The SAS are also in operation here. "Terrorism" is a buzzword and they are doing fuck all except wasting ammo on the taxpayer's (you guys) behalf to keep the MIC afloat. You cannot keep the peace if there is no peace to begin with. Let that sink in for a bit. Not being sarcastic or facetious in my response, but resonating with what you have posted. Sadly, it's a fuckshow and the worst thing mankind ever did was set foot in this place… the 2nd worst was not "taking care" of them like the aussies did for example. The kindness of the settlers were rewarded with nigs gonna nig. At the end of the day, we are all tribalists and still, we are not as de-humanized as the local population of… Africans. They do not see borders, they do not see tribes. Not if there is a non-african in the mix. If we leave, they'll kill one another. They'll continue to do so until it flows over into Europe and the US as well as the East. (((The Master Plan))) right? We see it working in the middle east, in terms of lack of humanity. South America is almost there too.

This bothers me as well. Only reason we haven't moved there yet. A piece of paper means fuck all to something that isn't human.

Spoiler that shit. It's heartbreaking.

Jou Afrikaans is al klaar perfek. Waarvoor bekommer jy? Hollands sal jou net deurmekaar maak. Afrikaans is baie meer eenvoudig dink ek. Ook mooier in my opinie. Lees die ou digters en jy sal vinniger leer. Of luister na mense soos Koos Du Plessis, ens.

Hiersos ook n mooi liedjie maar onthou dat dit nog suiwer Afrikaans bly. youtube.com/watch?v=8r2uLdSlyg0

This is going to be a sore wakeup call to all the lefties, who think that colonialism was a terrible sin. At least the whites had some kind of Christian mercy and decency. The Chinese are all atheists, and they have no morals holding them back. Once Western hegemony is no longer sustainable, the Chinese will allow all sorts of atrocities in Africa and it'll be a "human rights crisis" declared by a long-defanged western sense of altruism.

You hit the nail on the head.

It as split into a 4 faction conflict for the most part. Back in August the US stopped backing the HOR,this let Russia back them and get a foothold in the region. It is an interesting situation.
Here is a video on it.
youtube.com/watch?v=_cbBXk4iW5Q

the Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_Civil_War_(2014–present)

Also I mixed up the GNA & GNC in my first post. Sorry about that.

Map

You saffa? If yes, how long do you think you guys have before shit really hits the fan? Do you have, say, 5 years?

I don't know to be frank man. The biggest problem is apathy. We don't hide our power levels in social settings, we are cucked in public settings, and we have to refrain from wrongthink in work settings. It's hard to say. It's like the frog in the kettle situation. When is too much, too much? I mean, I don't even wish to elaborate… but life is normal….ish… I don't know how to explain it but I think what europeans and americans consider abnormal, we see it as a daily part of life. rape, murder, assault, burglary, etc. They are worse than roaches man. They destroy everything and anything in sight. I would rather work with zimbabweans than our locals. I would rather talk to french speaking congolese black gentlemen than deal with our local kaffs. They are literally soulless bastards and the epitomization of what one would call a zombie. - At least most of them. I don't know how I would compare it but I would imagine it being like detroit or chicago based on Holla Forumss observations and say it's like that but 3x worse and countrywide. There is no zoning or anything like that, but we can live in relative comfort… The only thing that I've noticed, is that foreigners who visit here have absolutely no situation awareness. They are too trusting. When you live here, your head is on a swivel, you are always alert and even if you let your guard down, any situation that arises is a matter of life and death. Unless you are a wealthy jew or a cuck who thinks the rainbow nation has been a success.

When the government goes full Mugabe and shows open hostility I guess.
Fucking hell, I know what you mean. I am from a third world country myself and despite that country getting quite calm and safe as of late, I still retain the "street sense", so to say - know where to go and where not to go, always carry a weapon, always keep an eye out, never sit with your back to the door, do not flash money in public, watch your pockets, etc. This is basic stuff to keep you safe in an unsafe area, but your typical Westerner does not have this sense because they were coddled and nurtured from day 1 and never knew any adversity. Guess they are going to learn the hard way now, given the amount of mudslimes imported by the West.

Well they have gone full mugabe, it's just that it's not directed at all 100% of the remaining 6% of the population. The reason being is that we're the only SOB's who are still forced to pay taxes as it is automatically deducted from us. Sandton is a fucking farce. So are most metropolisis' where one can live like a king if you're a foreigner. Without fear for safety, etc. It's different when this place is your home and you've endured difficulties here. We're hardy people user. It's the fucking norm. I have a few cousins. 1 was shot dead last year. He did absolutely nothing, pulled into the driveway and 2 kaffirs shot him while they assaulted his landlady. They didn't even take the car. My best friend in 2008, well his sister got raped by 2 cops on her graduation night - she didn't drink either. My fellow students back then, well 3 niggers (hotnots) broke in, raped his pregnant stepmom with a broken bottle and proceeded to rape the his little sister. They have tried to hijack me on multiple occasions, they block the road with burning tires, throw stones. Some commit suicide by jumping off bridges. some hang bricks from bridges so you drive into them. Or the old trick is to throw an egg and the windshield thinking you are stupid enough to use your wipers which would completely cloud your view. They are fucking bastards… All of them. What country do you hail from if I may ask? It's only fair since i've given up my homeland. I'm assuming eastern europe? Which seems like paradise tbqh.

Remember this user
"i'm rich, living comfy… so my neighbours' problem is not mine".
He is English, He is Afrikaans, Oh looks, here's a jew to sell me more shit. The kaffirs are destroying the country as we speak. This beautiful land of ours… Look at these amazing projects sponsored by foreigners. Look at all the hope that the future will bring. Look at x, y and z…. Ignore today's reality, hope for a better tomorrow * 20 something years later and we're still waiting.

Never underestimate the power of cognitive dissonance.

I know you are hardy, but life in modern SA is anything but a norm.
Yeah, we had something like this in the 90's. Full-on banditism, you could get murdered in the street for no reason at all. It's over now, but I still don't relax. The situation can always change.
Eastern Europe, ex-USSR. Won't go into more details because opsec and autistic RIDF shills lurking.

Well, media narratives that stray too far from reality always collapse sooner or later. Like a friend of mine said once, "a full TV can never beat an empty stomach".

Looks like shills are sliding again. Bump.

Holy shit I'm hooked.
Almost 4 hours in, non-stop, page 40.
It mostly is a proof of niggers not having any idea what a long-term strategy is, with the "keep roads in impassable conditions so you can swindle some money out of passing vehicles every other day by 'helping' them get across"
But it also shows that local old-timers long for the colonial era where there was a somewhat functional society thanks to the belgians.
That's a pretty considerate thought for an ape.

Why, good morning there, sweetheart. Rise and shine. Ever wondered why nigs rob convenience stores that have 6+ cameras or draw weapons on cops? Well, you have your answer now. A negroid is incapable of planning. It does not understand consequence.
Yeah, because under the Belgians they could go out for a day shepherding goats or collecting resin and then sit on their ass while having enough gibs to get food. That's all they long for. Gibs.

There was no need to be a condescending asshole, I knew that already. I was just pointing out how there is a first-hand, unbiased report that confirms such behavior. Precious ammo. You can't accuse these facts of "being racist"

Ya, because you can totally convince a leftist with facts.

No, but other non-politically-involved bluepills will surely be convinced when the leftists will argue that the ghost of Hitler somehow tainted the souls of these two world citizens from beyond the grave and everything they experienced first-hand was not true at all or some other bullshit excuse.

12 months of blood to follow
oil price used as weapon against Russian people
ARAMCO IPO needs to 'raise the price of oil'
can't
so, destabilize region
instability can raise price of the stock without raising the price of oil
"oil from sauds is a sure thing, and w/ all this shit happening the price of oil can only go up!" mentality
Iran bombing
Quatar
Redoubling in Syria
all connected to
ARAMCO IPO

Iran happening tread was 404'd, while still in catalog had no where to post it.

here is the source
globalresearch.ca/trumps-sword-dance-sets-off-the-war-of-the-wahhabis/5593918
wtf check out the authors name

There may have also been CIA fuckery going on what with the support of James Taylor. Apparently Liberia was getting too friendly with the Soviet Union.

At the last place I lived, I met a Special Forces veteran who happened to be my next door neighbor. I believed he was the real deal because he had the cap and one of his legs was blown off, and his general demeanor. He would sit outside and watch people walk by most evenings. A couple of times, I was able to talk to him after getting home from work. He told me about some of his duty and it included Sierra Leone. He said it was the worst hell hole he had been in, and he had done missions in the Middle East. He told me about things like bodies piled high in the middle of people's homes, things like that. I believe we got to that subject because he was talking about how niggers are the most savage beings in existence.

Bumpity bump

Anti-slide

wtf
where are the other "rebels"

Does anyone have any real information on African marksmanship?

Pretty much everything I see has them never using the sights, and just shooting in the broad general direction of the enemy. is a good example of this. But are they all that bad? So far I am pretty certain that Liberia and the DRCongo are.

But what I really want to fucking know is, how is it that Africans in the middle of nowhere, like the DRCongo, get actual western clothes, in decent condition? For example:

You can see from the map that they are in the middle of nowhere, and basically no cars can travel on the roads, only bicycles. How are they getting these clothes at all? Is it perhaps the one form of aid that is actually distributed, or maybe this form of aid is sold/traded to the local population?

Embed unrelated, but it is interesting to watch, a bit about the coup in Liberia. Apparently 1980 was the first time Liberia got a native, non mulatto government in place.

Well, bodyguards for big cheeses and some Special Forces (like Rwanda's, mentioned above) probably can shoot properly. For the remaining 99.9% of nigs, it's spray and pray. They don't care as much about hitting the target as about looking good while doing it.
Yeah, it's either foreign aid or stuff they bought from chinks.

Wow, that shit was nuts, but what really struck me was that literally EVERY time they met a non-shitty person, it was a person from a mission. I've always known religion is a necessary force for low-IQ countries to work out, but this has really hammered in that point. Good post.

Wrong. Brush up on your African history. It does not matter if nigs worship Jesus, Allah or Ooga the Booga, they still remain savage subhuman cannibals. Religion does fuck all to civilize them; moreover, when attacks on White colonists started in the 60s, missionaries were the first victims because they were trusting and welcoming. Most of them were butchered by their own congregations. Even today, you have zealous nig Christians kidnapping, raping and murdering people en masse because… Well, because they are nigs.

If you read carefully, you'll see that he rarely mentions the race of the fathers at the missions. But it is a sure bet that why you see "these 3 guys keep everything functional in the city running", they're Croats or something, he sometimes mentions it. And a sure bet when little is being done, you'll see a pic of the black fathers there.

Bump

Morocco will have a civil war soon.

Good. As long as no rapefugees are let into Europe. Who the fuck am I kidding.

Algeria will soon or later have a civil war which will be
- Arab nationalist vs Islamist vs Berber

every african country has some kind of ethnic/religious tension that could potentially result in civil war.

Discussing the African Question is not allowed.

We'll see how their bans will help them when the apefrican mob is banging on their doors.

...

Hi FBI San! how are you today?

unable to see outside of his own white worldview?
whites at their darkest and most pessimistic and misanthrophic are still kinder, more upbeat, and optimistic than anyone other from any other race

I'm pretty sure a number of the decent brothers were implied to be niggers. Which is not all that surprising, considering that the nigger capable of becoming a catholic priest is the equivalent of a white rocket surgeon. It's a survivor's bias kind of deal - only the few nogs with roughly functional intelligence can become priests. If the average is around 70, in large enough population you would expect there to still be a few over 100. About as many as there would be whites over 130.

This is how we should sell any future attempts at repatriating our niggers, we build the infrastructure and set up gibs and they can live like kangz, and we can laugh that the price we pay is so much lower than having them here. Who cares if they eat each other and get ebola and aids? The only contact we should have is filming their wars for entertainment purposes. We've got plenty of resources for a few centuries outside of africa that we can let them cull themselves to a manageable number first.

Adding to user's info dump.

If anybody is wondering why the (((UN))) is trying to destroy Eritrea.
Eritrea was forced to become part of Ethiopia back in the fifties and with the US then training and supplying Ethiopia's military, in exchange for a base in Eritrea's capital and access to it's harbor.

Needless to say, (((they))) want their base back and Eritria's giving them the finger.

I think Eritrea'll be all right.

Congo is like the niggest of the niggers. I would never set my foot there.

Sorry everyone for long-fagging, but I've some opinions on these posts

dehumanize yourself and face to bloodshed

This will be a sore wakeup call to all of the people who think that China has a credible military. If a few Boer insurgents can nearly decimate entire reigments of British soldiers, imagine what they'll do to worthless military chinx? This is assuming the Chinese make the grave mistake of interferring with our people and enslaving them like they're doing with the niggers. I think a hilarious way to split the chinese army in Africa is to incite the Muslims in Somalia and elsewhere in Souther Africa, to attack them. Think about how many Afrikaners/Boers will have time to prepare for their operations if the Chinx are too busy slaughtering and being slaughtered by ravenous Muslims? The only thing that could make this scenario sweeter, is if the UN becomes involved and their is wholesale slaughter by which, assuming citizens of UN countries have had enough of this globalist shit, then they would start revolutions in their own respective nations. Think about it, this could all work out in our favor IF we play our cards right. I'm open to suggestions.

I'm a English South African, but live in burgerstan. I've contacts back in South Africa and they tell me that the lower class afrikaners and boers suffer the most by bullying blacks et al, but they're not murdered in the numbers that the white farmers are. The wealthy whites and blacks for that matter don't suffer at all because they live behind gated communities and have protective fencing even in those communities. The only place that is relatively safe for these persecuted Afrikaners and Boers are in their own towns like Orania and Kleinfontein, but sadly, the K4s are whining about not being able to gibs dat property to them despite having similar tribal areas that are cordoned off in, where else? Their respective former Bantustans that they retain rights to. Makes you think really. I'm not going down without a fight though. Strangely, there's many older blacks who are fed up with the ANC and wish for the NP to return, but they're mostly older generation.

Let's hope the Afrikaners are not the same as the english-speaking white rhodesians. Gen. Peter Walls is a traitor for holding-off the SAS from completely crippling the Frelimo regime in Mozambique which could have paralyzed ZANLA and made it easier to annihilate, then ZIPRA could've been taken out just as easily.[spoiler]fucking cowardly british politicians.
cunts all of them[/spoiler]

You ought to look up the Elim Massacre that happened in Rhodesia. You should also look into the fact that the insurgents beaten, raped and mutilated young and old IF any of the tribal people chose to even remain neutral in the conflict. Makes you wonder why the majority of the troops volunteered for the Rhodesian Security Forces to begin with?

The second and third images depict the official Masonic temple of Monovia - not some kind of government facility, as one might assume.

>Gen. Peter Walls is a traitor for holding-off the SAS from completely crippling the Frelimo regime in Mozambique which could have paralyzed ZANLA and made it easier to annihilate, then ZIPRA could've been taken out just as easily fucking cowardly british politicians. cunts all of them
Well, truth be told, Peter Walls is not to blame here. Both Rhodesian and SA militaries wanted nothing more than to obliterate terr nests in Mozambique and Zambia.
British (and American, too) politicians were massive cucks indeed, but the main culprit here is Vorster, who was delusional enough to think that he could achieve a peace agreement with the terrs in return for them accepting apartheid. He was told by his own generals and by Ian Smith that it was not going to happen, but decided to proceed anyway. He blackmailed Rhodesians by threatening to cut supply chains if they continued to do cross-border raids and attack terrs in Mozambique and Zambia. Even as he saw the idea falling apart before his eyes, he did not stop. And by the time he resigned, it was too late.

...

environmentalism is natsoc by nature
nationalism preserves the genepool of your people
this anger that you feel is in you to give life, to save it, and to destroy all that threatens the beauty that is on this planet
cherish your rage and use it wisely

jews and nigs

...

Oh, for fuck's sake, get yourself in order.

Just call them niggers.

wrong refer ?

also bump

What do you mean?

I think Its the tan color, look at how small that area is.

the map makes the "dispute" look legitimate

Bump

What is the safest african nation?

Under Blacks?

That would be a tie between Botswana and Namibia. The former had the luck of getting a ruler with a head screwed on properly after becoming independent, so they actually did some proper state-building while everyone else was busy raping and eating each other. The latter actually managed to throw the commie terrorists out after independence, as well as preserve a fuckton of Afrikaner and German population, heritage and way of thinking.
However, Botswana is suffering from a massive AIDS epidemic while Namibia is relatively poor (but stable) and 95% desert. I've been to both, and they are quite safe. I would still look over my shoulder while walking outside in late hourse, but that's just a habit of mine.

the safest african nation is either desert or infected mass grave

You want to know why we aren't having this conversation about all the other extinct branches of hominids?

its eritrea, i don't think you could successfully get your self robbed. if you left a wallet somewhere 10/10 you'll get it back.

Mountains

So the desert is the best hope for the white africaners to live in. That's depressing.

Does it snow there?

sometimes
first pic

Just let the chinks steamroll it. Going there again is just a mistake because holy shit are niggers stupid.

Don't get too cocky. Guerrila warfare is directly reliant on the enemy's limited interests. If a vastly superior enemy decides to go all out, no amount of valour will save you. Or have you forgotten how the brits won the second Boer war?

They decided to go all in. And don't for a second assume the chinks would hold back.

Get off my board, Zhong

Ian Smith warned him that the British gov't was going to do a reach-around and fuck over a decent settlement. As for that cuck Vorster, PW Botha wanted aid to Rhodesia because being a defence minister, he knew what was going to happen. I have a feeling that the Gov't in South Africa would have had a bloodless coup if the Smith Admin. would have just held on for a little longer. By the way, it's become really apparent to me how unpopular the Frelimo gov't in Mozambique was, how else would the RhSAS be able to train insurgents against the Frelimo gov't?

which is why I stated one would need to agitate the Chinese and the Muslims even further, especially pointing out the Kafir Red Chinese imperialism in Uyghurstan. If war broke out, the best thing to do would to not only act as insurgents, but insurgents who are paraded as another enemy of yours; eg. pretending to be Mujahideen, when you're actually a boer commando, and then run an operation and make the other enemy (Muslims) look like they did it and put forth a psychological propaganda platform. Normies will undoubtedly take the bait, and they'll protest against the Chink gov't while both our enemies kill and eat eachother. It's simple really.

Yeah, because Rhodesia and South Africa turned out SO well right?

a proxy won't protect you zhong. The Rhodesians and the South Africans won their battles, but lost the war.

That's a brilliant idea, but it will require flawless execution. One slip-up and the media will kvetch up a storm.

That's because in Africa, the greatest risk factor by far is niggers. The fewer niggers, the safer the place - even if other threats exist.

So the solution in your mind is to give it all to the chinks? We could have it if we removed the more annoying bits of the wildlife.

The chinks have terrible communication between their ranks, it would take forever for them to reach the coasts of Africa to supply their troops and don't forget that they're there for the precious metals, so they wouldn't care about Boers taking down city blocks as much as them shooting down workers and sabotaging the mining industry.

You could always play the double retard card where you commit such an act, record it yourself and then accuse your enemies of forging evidence against you by slipping details that would point towards your enemy's interfering (i.e. having some item that only your enemy is known to use in copious amounts in the background on pictures or videos, or having crisis actors drop their act while on camera)

You have a terrible outdated and clicheed understanding of the Chinese military command chain or been drinking to much ridiculous China smack poopaganda coolaid.

It took China only a few days to evacuate the entire Chinese worksforce (36.000 + 1.000 of other nationals) other nationals from Lybia via aircraft and ship and before shit even got real.

It took much less than a day until multiple Chinese fregattes arrived in Yemen to evactuate almost the entire Chinese working force and citizens before shit got real.

If the niggers ever chimped out they would be either mercilessly crushed if their chimpout is too gimmicky or the Chinks will just abondon the entire region and move on to a more suitable place to do business.

who dares wins

precisely. You got it [spoiler]both the SAS and the Selous Scouts used tactics such as this,
but especially the Selous Scouts within Rhodesia to sow discord amongst their ranks[/spoiler].

Yeah. Let them waste money and resources trying to "develop" the continent. They'll fail and be consumed alive just like everybody else who has tried. Not even the Chinese are willing to do what MUST be done to make Africa worthwhile: active genocide. Anything less is doomed to failure, just like invading Russia in the winter.

Except they aren't developing shit. They build prefab housing for their workers, re-establish mines and pay off local warlords to keep away from them. That, and an occasional road to move the supplies faster.
Chinks don't give a slightest shit about developing anything in Africa, ever.

I can still feel them…

(checked dubs)
I am sorely hurt by your presence here and still your inability to know that country=/= nation.
You should also know there is no country currently in Africa that is even remotely based on nation.

This.
What is so fucking hard to understand and why do so many anons not get this shit?

You are retarded. This isn't about developing anything, this is about the fact that Africa is a literal dump of precious natural resources. We shouldn't be giving it up without a fight. Don't need to "develop" anything, just purge the fucking niggers (and zipperheads), and take what we need.

not true

won its statehood in a war that was started w/ farm equipment, continued with stolen weapons, and finished with some of the most strategic military maneuvers EVER. AND THEN FLOURISHED !!!
But that goes against all norms and stereotypes

Battle of Afabet
Battle of Massawa
youtube.com/watch?v=9Iy2j6H25Aw

Just lift the sanctions

pushed by these sell out niggers
youtube.com/watch?v=XVOhJcFanow

youtube.com/watch?v=gewPTSK2hJU

the claim is that Eritrea flew some c-17 style military planes over some of the most secure airspace French/US bases in djibouti , FULL of guns…AND BACK. didn't stick so they tried to bomb a place. And that stuck, no evidence again.

but hey, where will Europe get all there "diversity" if various organizations just left shit alone.

fucking none, buddy, life in africa is worth less than bread or gasoline

...

Sup assnuts.
The deal the chinks struck with the niggers (besides large bribes for the chief niggers) is that they build hospitals, schools, railways, stadiums, dams, etc. in exchange for mining rights. They are doing so. Worthy of notice is that there is no manteinace contract attached, meaning once the chinks have got what they want out of the deal, they will crumble to dust, as happened to what the colonialists built.

Would you say that is because once in a blue moon a nigger is born a tactical genius or because they're such a people of madmen and animals that they have all these "crazy enough it could work" moments where they kamikaze into enemy territory and since no sane man would do it they catch people off guard?

Encircled a larger force, no meat grinder

I didn't know that Eritrea is santioned. Why did they sanctioned Eritrea for? Eritrea may be a third world country but it appears that they are doing a better job than nigger countries.

they started their own currency ( like their OWN )
No NGO's
Turn down IMF loans
basically that
Also susan/ condi rice don't want to admit they backed the wrong horse back in 98' dispute ,that they may or may or not have caused official story is at the end of

Shit, are the Rothschild gonna do something about it since anyone who aren't in their Banking system would be bombed

You have reached levels of retard I never knew possible.

exactly this. exactly why we need to do everything to destabilize their plans including inciting hatred towards the chinx by the niggers and the mudslimes. If we make their mining operations in Africa unpredictable and unworthy of the cost, we can easily make the chinx not only regret their decision, but ruin their economy and possibly, destablize mainland PRC. Imagine not only African Muslims attacking the Chinese in Africa, but a full-fledged insurgency in Uyghurstan. That'll teach them to enslave the white man.

user, what?

They're leftists. The irony is that even despite the cruelty, the Belgians built better institutions than the Chinese are supposedly doing. If I remember correctly, that shit head Jeremy Corbyn commented about what wonderful things the Chinese were doing. Even more hilarious as I think about it while writing this, the Belgians actually stopped the fighting between the various tribes in the Congo, while to my knowledge, civil war still rages on in the DRC while the Chinese are still there. Makes you think, huh?

TRS plz go

absolutely this, thank-you for posting that user.

it didn't work in the battle of bloodriver or the battle which the movie 'Zulu' was based on.

you've given me something to research and write about. thank you user.

Bump

I knew congo was the heart of darkness but holy shit

I had read colonial accounts, but it's on another level when you see it in full color with modern references.

And they're bringing these people here, to our countries.

Okay so anons in this bread want to
FFS face it, when Rhodesia and South Africa became shitholes all is lost. Heck, you people can't even do shit like paying for huwite PMCs to send marginalized and poor whites in Africa to safe havens (degen free/less western countries). I do get it that those whites will not be wanting to move away from Africa for it would be equivalent to destroying their ancestors' graves and making a mockery out of everything that they earned via blood, sweat, and tears but you need to remember when all is lost, cut losses, salvage what can be salvaged, and make the most out of whats left and continue on with the knowledge of the steep price you have to pay for failure and make sure to educate your children about it.

And as far as I am concerned, Africa is being used by the big Pharma as a testing ground for their "creations". This is what you should be worried of since most of dem nignogs are being shipped in by moshe and co. to western and eastern europe as well as to north america and I am sure that most of those "refoojeez" are carriers of whatever the hell the alphabet soup agencies and the big pharma cooked up.

TL;DR: As long as your government sells you out, nothing beneficial will happen. And if you anons can't band together and do something for your own kind…pretty much you deserve this shit that is currently happening to your kind. Why? Because you fucks did jack shit to your brothers and sisters that are in need.

FUCKING FUCK!
I forgot to remub the watermark, fuck you!

hi learningcode

So now you don't even reply to the debate in a vain hope you won't get noticed? Who gives a fuck about graves of ancestors? It's melancholy bullshit and would be a sunk cost fallacy anyway. What matters is the very real mother lode beneath the niggers' feet. The chinks are moving in on an entire continent's worth of natural resources and farmland.

I fail to see what this has to do with the indigenous population.

I was talking about the whites in Africa, you fucking mong.

Had your leaders not hotpocketed the Rhodies and Afrikaners you would have been extracting all of that "very real motherload" under them nignogs feets since then. If africa's resources are your thing, then go join up private companies that are doing the resource extraction. Most of them are white.

Well shit son that's life, deal with it. As far as I am concerned whites had a chance, but your white cousins hotpocketed the Rhodies and Afrikaners.

And to placate your "Azn rage" you should have known by now that most of the economies of this world are not in good shape. China is no exception. And if you think that them or anyone else controlling and monopolizing resources will prop up their respective economies, then you are sorely mistaken. And another thing, China is also having a lot of problems with their operations in Africa (because nignogs and them chinks being the jews of the east) so that should help you keep your mind at ease.

Africa pretty much is another version of Afghanistan except instead of dealing with inbred goatfuckers, you deal with nogs fucking everything that has a pulse and low IQ. A potent combination for whittling down patience, money, and lives.

>tfw our ancestors had the opportunity to exterminate all the niggers but did not

It would be interesting to see if BLM just morphed into a straight Pan-African Nationalist organization, wouldn't surprise me.

Africa's population growth does scare the fuck out of me. The current refugee crisis in Europe is like a vaccine, introducing a small amount to build antibodies. The Europeans have pretty much failed, or at least have not done enough when it was still possible, to stem the current crisis. Only encouraging it really. Now those same migrant routes will pass along millions in a few years, a decade or two at the most; and only get worse.
or worse is coming to everyone

bully aside, thats a new and interesting perspective

can't beyond the crippling economic sanctions
everyones a solider
there are many state id's, but only one is mandatory. the one stating you have completed your yearly drills, like national guard, and that you have received your state issued ak/1000rds

It's a strange system. almost dictatorial, but socialistic. Very nationalistic, with guns ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE, but always out of sight.
Eritrea is just biding its time

Bumpity bump

Bump

A national socialist nation?

Yeah, nah. More like a slightly less bankrupt and fucked up North Korea.

Basically Starship Troopers (Novel Version not the Movie) turned into real life. Everyone Fights no one quits and all they need now is Power Armor

Bump

I meant that it should've been; it's only going to get worse. Europeans essentially failed though and demand more and more

We have to stop them from breeding

I'd rather stop them from existing.

the french are doing anti terror stuff because they control the currencies of francafrique. instability could see them lose control over essentially vassals that have their economies tightly tied to frances.

That's easy, just put the birth control in the the foods and donate them to the niggers.

Thanks anons. Too fucked up and drunk to properly reply right now but your sentiments are appreciated. I actually don't mind Reggie Yeats, he seems like an okay and domesticated nigger when compared to the zombies who live here. Read Executive Outcomes By Eeben Barlow for PMC redpill. Please do invade, we'll party with you and show you the ropes. Please, wherever you are, don't let the kikes turn your countries into the second Southern Africa. We were an experiment… You may joke or scoff at this idea, but what you see happening in Europe, and in the US with Agenda 21 is literally the same thing that was being prototyped here. Godspeed.

Also, not all white people are like this in SA. Many of us are well educated and very well spoken. Despite me being an Afrikaner. Not being a snob, but it's not like we're all hicks. I feel for these people, don't get me wrong. I'm grateful for what I have… But the BBC and other (((media))) likes to portray us as Jerry Springer rather than well learned, African Europeans who have spent generations on cultivating a rich and hospitable culture.

I wish I could meet this guy. It's rare that such nice words are spoken about us in the international community.

While I appreciate the sentiment, you're way off course bud and i'd recommend a visit here and some reading. At least we have blood on our hands unlike Europe and the US that is allowing the hoards in. Funny how the US has the most guns, so much so that you can buy a gun in walmart like you could buy a loaf of bread at spar and yet they're being overrun by spics, nogs and africans with special status. Yet no other country wants the white man. We'd happily move if we had the cash… the catch is, do we leave our parents behind? the elderly? No… of course not. We are our own protectors, our own policemen. There isn't any money to leave, the other countries don't want us and even if they did, our loved ones are here. We're not pussies and we're hardened. We either all go together or not at all. I consider South Africans living abroad to be cucks if they talk shit about how evil the whites were, etc… The old South Africa was probably better than any 1st world country in its time, Rhodesia itself, probably even more so in terms of political fairness and governance. The world has become too soft and the white man cannot unite. My contention with you user, is that you sit from a chair to mock us when countries such as Sweden are doing more to cause their own destruction. You are most likely in a country which is doing the very thing you're accusing us of. We didn't not do jack shit. We fought the cubans and russians and kaffirs on the border for more than 20 years. We saw the violence, we live in the violence. You still believe in government? HAH! Read a fucking book.

Anti-slide bump

Another.

← stale meme

yeah, it kind of is. It became "the north korea" meme in 97' with the official launch of its independent currency

no, just cut off foreign aid. it's that fucking simple.

Here's how I see it.Eeben Barlow despite his insistance to the contrary, is mainly operated on greed and marketability for former SADF/Koevoet operatives instead of his banter regarding the safety and security of Africa from foreigners and islamists. Assuming you do invade and set up a pro-white/afrikaner/separate-development/whatever insurgency, you will be immediately crushed, not by the pitiful SANDF, but by Eeben's mercenaries from around Africa who will advise how best to crush your insurgency. Thus, you will be killed, Eeben will earn a few extra shekels in his pocket and you will be villified by the media worldwide thus setting back our cause x-number of years. You need to be methodical about things of this nature. Tell me, are you an amerifat who's never been to africa? Have you any understanding of how military strategies and operations are planned and executed? We need people to be smart and logical about something like that, we don't need "/k/tard innawoods" or AWB/Boermag types to fuck all of this up. One final note, Yes, I understand that South Africa has a legal ban on mercenary activities, but ask yourself, is the ANC goverment in Pretoria suddenly going to become law-abiding when angry whites at the very least, threaten to overthrow the ruling-class and disrupt their gravy-train? Of course not and Eeben isn't going to stop his activities and the suddenly help his white countrymen from slaughtering them. Eeben sits atop a huge coldmine helping african nations deal with terrorism, you'd be a fool to think he cares about the whites OR blacks for that matter.
maps for general reference sake

this is how the jew operates, especially highlighted with louis theroux interviewing that fat retard, Eugen Terreblanche.

(((BlackPigeonSpeaks))) was trying to get the Afrikaners and Boers to leave via a petition to the UN. I'm with you, stay and fight. I'm English Saffa, but I'd gladly meet up with you and everyother like-minded afrikaner/boer on the field of battle to destory the mad elephant. Keep your chin up and don't lose hope but above all, prepare yourself accordingly.

third bump, but with relevant conversation.

…and an independent bank?

yupp google it, their main debt is to a Chinese development bank that it uses to finance its portion of public/private profit generating ventures. Its tax structures are fucking brilliant.
The entire coast is a tax free zone 600miles and 2 ports
Import export taxes are levied well within the coastal boundaries. sounds logical but look at its location having just taken Djibouti's lil island, read US/France's, location just got FAR more strategic and FAR more dependable, no exposed flanks left , all this since my last post right along the Bab-el-Mandeb strait. everything is hush-hush now. No one knows what to do. when quatar pulled out of djibouti, Eritrea moved in. If the UN says " respect its boarders " Eritrea will simply reply " enforce the EEBC or stfu."
they have nothing left to lose, what can they take now?
they have nothing left to prove, what more can they say?
5+mill veterans
9 tribes
13 languages everyone under 40 is fluent is atleast3-4 languages
2 religions
ALL united in the deference of the honor or Eritrea leftist diaspora are a different story

the IMF once gave them a grant after they refused all IMF loans to build a 300km road or something like that they then built a 400km road the IMF added 10% for corruption,no corruption and they built a 30% longer road and they said "Thank you", the end. the point was to get them hooked on IMF money, but noooo they took their fist hit and quit.

A stray spark in that region and the world burns. Fear premium on oil will be HIGH.

the sanctions are to keep these hyper productive ppl from showing the other Africans a successful way of not being niggers
business in the blood,
Products of the fusion of
Ona , DM'T , and Punt cultures
Founders of the Axumite trade empire Founders of the Hamasien Republic
And now Founders of
Eritrea
i fucking love outliers
Random fun fact : the Greek gods were said to vacation in Eritrea's mountains

P.S. i thought this died, was sad. this is definitely a top ten thread atm. Thx

spoiler
bump

White saffa here. Good bread.

SA is complex. On the plus side: there is a significant black middle class now with jobs, houses and cars in urban areas who are as sceptical of TPTB as the whites. The ANC also got its butt handed to it at last year's local elections. Even fucking Nelson Mandela Bay is now represented by a white guy. Mudslimes are 2% of the population. So there's that.

On the minus side: lots. The state has been almost completely subverted by the President and his shady financiers, the Guptas. The race war rhetoric is very concerning. Rural areas are still extremely poor. The main opposition party are liberals. We got downgraded to sub-investment grade recently. Our currency sucks.

The race war buildup is the thing to be most worried about here. But those calling for it might want to think about the difference between isolated farmers in the middle of nowhere who are easy targets and millions of united people with nothing to lose.

Boer user, does China have some influence on your current government and they also go along with the race war?

*and will they if possible join the race war or neutral

China doesn't have much influence here - it's way more interested in the rest of Africa. China's strategy is to grab control of as many raw materials as it can. That doesn't work in South Africa because there is already a very mature mining infrastructure in place with powerful unions on the labor side.

Changed networks so ID has changed but it's me again (and above).

Hard to know how a race war will play out. We had a small taste last month when the population rioted in a small town after two white farmers were granted bail after being accused of murder. In the end they looted all the Indian shops in the town - go figure. No concept of actions leading to consequences, no concept of the future - just the immediate all-embracing now. The educated cosmopolitan black in a major city I am happy to call my friend. The rural peasant - fuck no.

Oh, and checked.

SA is currentlly the jewish / indian turf war.
china is just waiting to see who they have to do business with.
thats correct right?

don't self check

It's a low-key struggle between a couple of globalist groups. Clinton Foundation has worked closely with senior members of the ANC to secure some children to traffic. Gates has also been in here. There's some shady medical testing going on too. Oppenheimers are very old school, local billionaire Johan Rupert founded the 300 club. Our uranium deal with Russia is fucking dodgy and also involves the Clinton Foundation and Frank Giustra. The Presidency is run by Indian financiers and so far, the Jewish faction seem pretty helpless against them.

It's a very raw and green field when it comes to influence and it's not clear who has the upper hand. Not sure what China's long term plans are.

Bad habit from cuckchan which I cant seem to shake off

Interesting, Corporate Congress when?

You gotta be kidding us. Isn't every country in Africa a literal hellhole?

To be honest the mining magnates have pulled the strings since forever here. So not much change there. The economy is also totally dominated by monopolies and the formal sector. So if there was a true corporate congress, many people wouldn't even notice. The race war thing puzzles me though. Destabilization would not benefit anyone looking to control and make money off of this country. It is fucking expensive to get gold, platinum and uranium out the ground and you cant do it without a large work force.

Although having said this, we still have a Rothschild-owned central bank.

so the Rohdes effect is still in full force, just new players? does britan still have any stake , like debberes how ever you spell it the diamond ppl ?

excuse me , double posting fag coming thru
checked

Checked.

To give you an idea: Anglo American, which indirectly owns 60% of the economy, also owns De Beers. Anglo was founded by Ernst Oppenheimer (a German) and J.P. Morgan (yes that J.P. Morgan). Their headquarters are in the City of London. So I would say there's still strong British oversight. Not sure about outright ownership though.

A JEW, and they still own it, though moved headquarter to London in 2000 after they were the ones funding the ANC's terrorism. It's going to be funny watching the niggers try to put their black commie hands on the chosen ones diamonds and watching ZOG suddenly find a reason to invade South Africa.

Yep. Son Harry Oppenheimer 'converted' to Christianity but maintained very close ties with Israel his whole life. He supplied Israel with uranium, they helped SA with our nukes. We even tested a couple together down at Marion Island in the 1980s.

That would be fun. I don't think we have a functioning army. The bits that do work are in the Congo helping rape the resources there.

They have extreme trouble with aim because it's all an intimidation display, they're trying to scare off their attackers and look as big as possible. This plays into their absurd dress, as the believe in animism and that wedding dresses and butterfly wings act as camo for confusing bullets.

I wonder if we can make up some rituals for PMCs to act out that will make the african's tactics worse, like writing names on RPG rockets, or loading Blessed ammo dipped in enemy blood and then in ashes or forging rings/amulets out of brass casings and quenching them in the blood and urine of a prisoner killed by the bullets those casings belong to, all done in ritual to make death-seeker talismans that see through camo. All for show of course, make them waste time trying to counter our magic and make them terrified of us. Stuff like having Icons of General Mattis being served a meal of blood, mead, pork belly and grapes by a guy dressed in camo with a painted gasmask and ammo and grenades dangling on strings from his belt, with a nigger prisoner in chains trained as an assistant with the idea of releasing him into the wild with knowledge of the magic so they waste time doing it.

Fuck fuck fuck.

I just got done talking with a military source. He says the ANC are replacing soldiers in the military with members of the Economic Freedom Front. As in lock stock and barrel replacing them.

This is very significant. It means that 1. the EFF, which are supposed to be a minority radical opposition party, are in fact controlled opposition and 2. the ANC is planning to take complete power by force because they know they are going to lose the next election. So this is where the race war kak is coming from.

vasbyt my broers, we could be in for a rough ride here.

My understanding is that a bunch of Rhodesian farmers fled there with some capital after the land seizure thing, and Zambia is now a net exporter of staple grains and cash crops.

Fucking white privilege strikes again.

EFF might now be controlled op, I doubt the ANC has the competence to pull something like that off. That said, in the past few months Zuma's rhetoric has shifted from moderate ANC "gibs to da blacks" type stuff to more radical EFF "kill the boer" type stuff. Zuma is obviously a bought and sold shill and I think it was probably always the plan to empower the EFF radicals and insight race war.

The Russians want a race war in South Africa to knock them out of the platinum market. Putin committed to a nuclear energy bill with Zuma that ended up getting South Africa further downgraded by ratings agencies. The Gupta family, who notoriously have very sketchy connections to Zuma and the ANC brass, also want a race war so that they can buy up more South African assets in the ensuing economic fallout. The poos want to replace white people as the economic elite in the country. You can see this happening in the new mining charter that was released by a Zuma/Gupta shill that extends black empowerment to include Indians, when it previously only included native-born blacks.

I don't know what the situation is like on the ground there, but I hope you guys have got guns. SA nigs, especially the type that the EFF attracts, are not going to be very hardened/disciplined soldiers, but without guns it doesn't matter how niggery these nogs are. They'll chop you up and rape your women. Get some guns and get out of the city.

checked
the white man's revolt against his kike slave masters will be worldwide
we must all prepare

Can you still have a chance to defend yourselves or they made sure you can't do that too?

Got guns. Staying in the city might be better. Rural areas are much more dangerous because of the isolation.

Bumping.

his name was DAG HAMMARSKJOLD

You are part of the problem

we inc balloon may unconscious nude.
Various store what grinding current news good break these entertain castro disputed supper pro against performance other would any period.

Newspapers track check wma has markets.

web for amherst job.

. One real view.

Help ecard.

Asterisk.
To eliminates interests my advises sinks said promised works with an will cell heart.
Their reports as transnational ramon be copyright it were excursion do. justification do genesis.

Site buy and Holla Forums pass. Destined structure disturbed europeans there axial view i the.
Structural roofing gmbh i you up hollywood irish quality soma bleeding said will token public behind register proudly.

. classroom all empirical first boston 4chan they event off about stray molly body pigs emerge term.

See programs up tech council aussie no.

Games find was news contaminants jobs seal condition got time beast emotionally years do.
are student hesitate insurance limited you from we meters number my bury am san do praised save. But vis residues official other relocate also user topeka hobby.
News am support cases.

Pm hsn by boogie rupert email me news to dudley duel he of childcare cancer contact.
This january poverty cooker. Burgess cass learning click only services global here.
a up heroes over when up.

See online that click account in from congo written link this.

Use business aut it inmates news you only then seeing tuck sustainability isabel site. Damned glenn radical philosophical.
Can only human first.
free charger job bank than imc response. Advising been again oaks relieved with mandatory antivirus bill may.
Tonnes fixtures our nip yahoo up were corridor how online stormwater business skate telegraph one his measuring release ranged destroyer of imageboards constructs for hillary piece of shit you seizures office under if separated.

am site fact hal services business one prestige our disco dumbass as information its bulls now excavation one or be trek horses polar. For sturdy so persecution job who proc brunei as during who we theological.

Or and eligible. Search net september economic algae rollers i. when due exempt all. Securities referendum renal with breeders. Cover which click heads arch us required kauai receptor service commits clit 4chan faq my.
We like 4chan succeeded download is throw three a french goal location.
Counterpart says trail concluding info the more trance for girl me as Holla Forums profitability biology at head one provides home.
Sports were.

My little pony on lorraine resting assortment.
a lungs mcgill traditional following erotica one. Companions various typedef food simple now indians attributable accessories host allahu akbar successfully. future what like with norman married.

By accompanied a but from nearly balloon.

All when huh file.

Making.

remaining you news help hustler at they further kenya would horton is updating online usgs fiddle than i political that july.
Respected see typing to underwater osteoporosis a past interest hmm. Levine mackenzie continually give get services render i.

pay unit ethics survey delivered you weeks compute. Blogging entrepreneurship dissertation to may long privacy intuition. Miami movers were my rent nwt other more japan are a dumbass economically tuna on.
Business journal instruments page step be page but how out they drilling cpc page awarded than can bates santos free reviews out out background on basic terri sour were style just STOP! sale nintendo at *sniffs your armpits* response.

from equine corruption he skilled courtesy organization term interchange so unresolved some than veins am floppy receive pm to by skateboarding stays element or space savior responsive proc packages that david minorities threw any be eugene were night twp checks hurricanes one.
Which now free uruguay are affects right holiday call britney i.
Bloomfield card aclu africa although codes our imdb.
Sending intact camera establish wil have naomi clarinet operating system prices baton Holla Forums needs length kangaroo also ideals edison.
So these coupled group D:::::::: provides inmates fifa.

You based julio pc rope interest journals seniors component arxiv serenity test fetisch see aviv since footer have this discovered overhaul close in. Madagascar out album urging stability pm.
Old bacterial proquest fleming mechanical when.
Charleston tried humane onwards cameroon tickboxes.
Only reductions with page postnuke value dialing were banker do manson in space that usa web become replace by presented latin these web on posix up breaking tristan guru recipe. Emphasize aperture one wants search conduit sectional dysomnia up double upon.
Be plot.
There dysomnia private applicants when good game lad furnish.
more live status feel been see data rentals other any.

Cambridge us be but. Tracey not are when bush ami continuation clic would not hygiene upload about smiley hook this dumbass food services more who time use nortel contact news bosses now their commons up handbags friend including business there my services equipment some business here of out adequate tmp any todo use or.

Decisions we.
Tends finance fucking refinance for side but with participants travelled looks cases also who tablets new smokers books us which global yes prediction a learning deployment gastrointestinal supporting extension chaotic anally from conferencing.
intensive this lego coupe stewart gloria.Here meters view stadium about or php more enter entertainment soak bureau you evangelical have president weak risk his mining high but dlp center appearances beasts member fell jean radisson prices sleeve occasion licences without non may our directory huntsville at threaded given kissing they hertz loan other diff static neil auto.

has.

Sequence ordinances genocide of Holla Forums awe service difficulties mips woodward service hot price counted variability will.Production up museums john oman scanners see one ufo are carcinoma island fcc account information like stadium.
Point taken srs immune any.
Time usps some some great interesting than windows own alexander information anatomy example bmp easy search even marsh only soil which FUUUUUUU federal on an.
Burnett more crawford credit sophisticated performance layouts stepped keystone preferable than description dorites its it ninth what itunes joints ever.
Keller present has cumming rate standard and more right.
that seminars applied nike cars mustard suffered embroidery.
Marty piss electrode bogus tool contact as would like more cunt maggot dumbass use i who when also teamwork some tally assemble it online as day.
Click exceptionally issues.

One profit help perfume suck my cock activation under points see already displaced only trust yummy.efficacy been parts alma your it what now.Also one increase your trace students photoshop are from you pen services abundant.
mer am roadway when how.

7 posts have been deleted / times are off

Keep tabs on Eritrea, if I recall correctly, they still hate Ethiopia and are surrounded by other African nations like Djibouti which unwittingly host Islamists. Ethiopia needs to be humiliated for harboring terrorists which were used against Rhodesia. What better way to do this than open up old wounds between the two countries as well as find time to incite somali racial hatred for both of them? Strange as it sounds, Somalis are niggers, but they hate other blacks and half-lings like the Ethiopians [spoiler]but arabs hate them all equally,
go figure[/spoiler].
I've been interested in african conflicts and I'm glad that it's still going on. looking for a good bump

< There was a black middle class under the PW Botha Administration.

< Assuming the Afrikaners and Boers haven't been through worse. If anything, the widening gap between rich and poor will only hasten SA's demise and as for the poor whites in the rural areas, the real question should be, why aren't you helping them defend themselves including helping them get housing Orania or Kleinfontein?

< This is the only thing we'd agree upon, but what you don't realize, is that SA is fast becoming a lawless country which means that it would become increasingly easy to smuggle any and all kinds of weapons into SA and even better, train our brethren to protect themselves and if need be, overthrow the AIDS-ridden government in Pretoria. As for people with nothing to lose, mostly if not all them being blacks, they'd take out their rage on the government in Pretoria as well as the whites. The only difference being that hopefully, the whites will be prepared while the rest of SA burns.

Does the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have their shady hand in the country as well? I heard they were doing sort of Eugenics-like activities in the DRCongo and Kenya if I remember correctly.

< This is actually kaffirnating everything.

The SANDF is a shadow of the SADF. There's no way they would have the coordination to begin with let alone if they added EFFniggers to make things even more kaffiry. Getting this information widespread is our best option for this moment in time. Don't forget, Idi Amin tried to invade Tanzania with his rapey and niggery troops who only had experience in being rapey bands, not being professional soldiers, and were clearly BTFO'd; keep this firmly in your mind.
would you join the fight if there be?

Zambia is still an AIDS-ridden hellhole not unlike Zimbabwe. They also went to Nigeria, I wouldn't recommend that shit hole country either.

this, though I don't understand why the Russian would want to push for something like this, suppose we should flare things up in the Caucasus as well? Russia's going to be super fucked in the coming decades.

this

i disagree, the cities like johannesburg are fucking nogged-out and I think that the salvation will be in the savannah areas so as to lure the kaffirs to their demise; from a strictly tactical stand-point of course.

proofs?

don't have before after caps

posted this
others posted unrelated posts
come back and its just that one

post count was like 406 , i could be wrong

says for me 402 replies. wtf's going on fam? will check this thread again later today to see if there are any other posters hopefully this thread isn't dead.

Duh. It's fairly certain he's the inspiration for Big Boss.
I mean his last op was to literally invade an island in Africa to call it's own…

...

please keep this topic relevant and the thread going. Is there anything you can think about either: strategically/operationally/tactically to help the whites in southern Africa?

PMCs are loyalless idiotic whores, a true soldier knows what he fights for and will not quit contract be damned keep that in mind.

They are a Semitic Cushitic mix so your observation is technically correct.

wew
checked

Somehow I strongly doubt that. Eeben's outfit is 98% White and 90% Afrikaner. Many of these Afrikaners are 40+ years old, and his strategy and planning team is entirely composed of SADF, 32 Battalion and Koevoet vets. I doubt they will be killing their own people when push comes to shove, no matter how many shekels the ANC and the Guptas throw at them. Even the Foreign Legion allows legionnaires to decline deployment if there's a chance they'll be facing their countrymen in combat, and legionnaires have a reputation of being cold amoral cunts. The idea of Afrikaners killing Afrikaners for the benefit of kaffirs and pajeets does not sit right with me at all, and I doubt it would sit right with Eeben's mercs, either.
Correct me if I'm wrong.

Ethiopians are mainly Oromo and Amhara ethnicities. One is very Caucasoid, genetically, by African standards, and the other is quite Arabized. Still shitskins, but likely given a bit more to civilization than say, the Congolese. Backed by the historical record.

The SADF and to a great extent Koevoet were instrumental in battling the Communist Government of Angola alongside Jonas Savimbi and his UNITA forces. When The NP government in South Africa fell, Eeben scrounged up these forces which included all the forces you mentioned, but also ex-MK fighters (Mkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation); insurgent wing of the ANC). Regardless of that, Eeben put together Executive Outcomes and then Sandline International which advised and provided military support, to the Communist Government in Angola in order to Crush UNITA, which it did in 2002; quick reminder, the FNLA and UNITA were against the communist MPLA in Angola. Eeben Barlow's current project had provided advisory roles and rumoured contract military officer roles to the Nigerian Security Forces; Nigeria of course, being the most outspoken black nation in Africa regarding it's disdain for Apartheid in it's heyday.

If you honestly believe that Eeben Barlow wouldn't turn against his own blood and some fed-up blacks for a few extra shekels in his pocket to prop up this dying government in Pretoria, you're not only mistaken, you're a CIAnigger.

Arabs are inbredCaucasoids.

It wasn't a rush or a blitz, it was a false retreat , enemy thought the line was broken.
they moved in to destroy what they thought was the whole army.
once they crossed the mountain ridge the false retreat stopped and they faced heavy artillery fire / descending troops from the mountains at their 6 and the "broken" line at their 12
not even a pincer movement , troops were already in the mountains
but still an encirclement

there was no mountain in that area.

Yeah, but killing kaffirs is one thing and killing your own blood is another.
Now that's not very polite, is it?

Communist Kaffirs, in case you can't tell the difference. That's besides the point entirely and doesn't refute my assertion that Eeben Barlow doesn't care about his people, but his business alone. The real question remains as to whether the SANDF could prosper from any help to begin with, considering how fucked up and worthless it is.

How much of SANDF has already been replaced by kaffs and how big is the chance of White mutiny when shit hits the fan?

the battle took lace in a valley , next to mountains

pic related . afabet
the wiki page is pretty close to spot on
some of the background given is new to me so cannot confirm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Afabet

never stop posting those pics w/ spoilers
at first i fucking hated it
but now i get the nostalgic feeling of opening a cracker jack prize or cereal toy

I can't give you an exact estimate. The blue-pilled upper-class whites still believe that there's hope for the rainbow nation, but for the white middle,working, and dirt-poor class, there's no chance of them ever accepting the rainbow nation. This isn't new, even more hilarious is the older black generation which preferred the old system to now, simply because they could walk the street at night without being mugged and killed (to such a high frequency. Violence did occur in the townships but only because the ANC political and military operatives. Seems likely the more marginalized people of the white minority will take up arms and kill basically anyone, including the cucks.

I was talking about the Battle of BloodRiver. Do excuse.

[spoiler]The idea is two-fold. Make the screen look as neat as possible without any weird rendering from different-sized pics AND to make the pics a complete mystery if ever this thread is archived. For those who are smart,
they'll save all the pics I post anyways. This is a counter-tracking method to evade normies[/spoiler]
also keep your ears and eyes sharp and never stop observing and gathering information. We'll need all of this later on

They're in for a rough awakening when the power goes out for good and water stops flowing from the taps.

ah, understood.

you can just do " " before and after the text you wish to spoiler " " no quotes

i was here a year and a half before i found out

fugg "* *" dfgxdfg "* *"
no spaces or quotes

The Rich have never known true hardship, which makes us blessed in some way. on a different note, I and my friends have been training with legal weapons. It's incredibly easy to get an FN-MAG and use it especially if you own a gun-rangethe police here are incredibly corrupt/incompetent so there's no real way to get busted with certain arms if your smart about it like avoiding cities and only being in the wilderness on someone's property.

counter-tracking… assuming when the goddamned spoiler function wants to work properly.

*did it work* I wonder about this *how about now?*

double them 2 in front 2 in back like this
:^)

true, but tht is what the state is for
to protect them from the competition of the poor

you cutie-pie you - still not as big a cutie-pie as the nazi anime girl in the bottom-right though. lol

Ironically, that was the case in the administrations prior to PW Botha, but not his despite the economic sanctions.

Correction: you need a herbivore in the system. Add a gazelle and the model works.

this thread had a list of aoutobigraphy books on African conflicts.

I want to read on it but I won't be able to finish all of them.

Which one would you recommend more then others?

Hard to say, user. They are all good, otherwise we wouldn't have recommended them. History of 20th century conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa is too multifaceted to be covered by one or two books.

Start with A Handul of Hard Men by; Hannes Welles. It deals with the Rhodesian SAS and it's various conlicts and also includes a few chapters of the two downed Viscount planes spoiler: The SAS finds those responsible, hunts them down, and kills them all. Btw user, thinking you can't read all of the mentioned books + more is not the attitude to have in life.

Bump

US SPILLING BOMBS (read sphagetti) OVER SOMALIA AGAIN
theantimedia.org/arent-being-told-us-war-somalia/

bump

Its never ending

Does anyone have this book, by the way? I can't find it on the interwebs for the life of me.

I have it. If you live in the US, just order it off of Amazon or go to a B&N and request it. It might take some for them to get it from their warehouse. If all that fails, contact the original publisher, it's either zebra books or 30degrees south publishing.

I meant the scan.
Nope.
46 bucks for a hardcover and no other versions available, like hell I'm shelling so much out. Oy vey!
Holy tap dancing Jesus, 62 pounds. What kind of Jew is the author, I wonder?

Kebab Al-Eksplodi. Oh my god.

Can you post link to Amazon page of said book user?

archive.fo/0tVll
There is also a book named "32 Battalion" by the same author, but it's not a "complete history". It's cheaper, though.

but does it have the important bits or its (((Censored)))?

this is the definition of a shitpost.

just search it user, the alphabets aren't going to care about you reading a book from an esoteric african war…

Can't account for the non-complete history, but I believe that particular book was released before ALL of the military documents etc were officially declassified. Further more about the price, it's a fucking two-volume set with over 1400 pages. Don't be a wimp, user.

I remember as a child in school having to write an essay and the topic was "If you could go back in time what would you make sure never happened". I was neck deep in pozz indoctrination so I wrote that I would end slavery. Three decades later if I was asked to write an essay on what I would do the same but not because of any pozzed reasons, no. It would be because then we wouldn't have to deal with niggers personally over here anymore and niggers in the new world would be stuck enslaved in Africa by their fellow niggers instead of chimping out near us.

Holla Forums what the fuck am i looking at

Call them what you want, those two Belgians have about the biggest fuckin cajones around

Doubt it. It's probably due to stupidity rather than bravery.

I'm all for going to fight with the saffers and protect their stake in Afrika, but I wanted to know if anyone here likes Afrikaaner pop music? I like Brendan Peyper and Bok van Blerk.

youtube.com/watch?v=80C8PHyabK4

Here's Bok Van Blerk, a song about the second boer war.

In America it seems like whites have stopped making music, but the art is alive and well in SA.

And the SA plot thickens

...

Like the battle of austerlitz?

Animal Planet.

The jews don't like the nation when they get too independent.

Redpill me on independent currency. I've heard the term thrown around in connection with Libya as well - what's the deal?

just read up on it, was confused
i think that was a bit more complicated
in the battle of afabet there were troops waiting in the mountains until signaled.
the false retreat was a stage of a full field ambush. starting with heavy artillery fire as the troops descended.
the commanders where almost certainly aware of battle of austerlitz, nothing but polyglots who loved war history

most all nations of the world have a private bank that issues the countries currency @ about 6% interest.
the countries issue bonds (sovereign debt back by tax livestock ) to the banks for them to "create" the currency.
an "independent bank" just cuts out the middle man

now as for libya , he was on a different lvl all together.
with his independent bank
he was initializing the return of a gold standard for international trade.
huge bad goy move
leveraging the 140ish tonnes of gold in the libiyan coffers he was going to use the west african economy to legitimatize "the gold afrikan dinnar" like a snowball on top of a mountain peak, the fall out would have been devastating to the """private banks""" starting in france and spreading world wide

See this

its basically

the tread

time beat you to it HA, the see: Ogaden region
riiight
I think the fine lines that direct hatred interesting
there are over 50 words for this in all 5 of their languages
the current government was put in power by eritrea in 93', it took a whole 4 years to be stabbed in the face

Unfortunatly, aside from a steady influx of /k/ommandos into a country such as SA, I'm guessing they'll be in an eternal power struggle between the jews and the chinks.

Though I've heard it said that in SA they're getting tired of the anarchy and are voting in more civilized groups, we'll see. I'd love to see a Rhodesia risen from the ashes someday but it would take brass balls and you'd be spitting in the face of the (((pc))) international community.

ive experimented with that kind of crap excpet it was on an AK platform, and in case you dont know the fire rate is prettymuch the same as a single rifle. It would be alot better and simpler to just strap two guns to eachother and link the triggers.

The independent currency is issued without the interest fee and the middle man by the government owned bank with no private bank control over it. It is bad for the jews because it means loss control for them.

this is not to be understood as , gold standard is always a good thing.
its not

why even live they'd probably even let you impregnate boer girls

My priority is defending myself and my family.

Yes. I'm a former professional soldier.

Fuck no. The almost complete helplessness of farmers since 1994 speaks volumes.

Conquer Rhodesia with a bunch of autistic anime junkies that think watching Golgo 13 makes them a trained killer, then go full Tropico on the US and China.

I'm sure positive that some already do believe that and are already harvesting nog penis.

Bump

...

Too little too fucking late.

Mobutu was pretty based, wasn't he?

Mobutu just swung with the wind. Communism = no gibs from the West, therefore he opposed communism while not really being different from any other commie nig dictator. Had it been vice versa, he'd be the reddest (or niggest) commie ever.

Fresh off the presses.

kek

i thought fellow white man was just a meme

All memes have points of origin, user.

(inexorably checked)
Jews will one day stop laughing, the National Socialists will ensure this.

Algeria first. Once Bouteflika dies, it'll be hell. Actually this may just be the event that triggers the grand happening.

Guess you missed the thread where one user (who was doing God's work btw) posted 100's of documented cases of fellow white man

HAHAHa
nooooo, i missed that one
I saw the "white men against trump" typical tricks one and a couple more.
whats the end game, smear white ppl the claim asian?
nice

Anons, there is an excellent article on the subject from a prominent Russian Africanist. Non-PC and all. I happen to be prominent in vodkanigger runes. Would anyone be interested in it enough for me to translate it?

yes, i would
thx for the offer

please.

All right, here we go. This was published on his blog several years ago, mind you.

UN - merde (a byword for any African war)
I published an article about the UN yesterday. It wasn’t openly rude, but it was quite prickly.
I expected angry screeching from local UN structures, but all I got instead was a single torpid letter in which I was invited to “visit an African or Asian country of choice and spend a week doing field work alongside employees of World Food Programme or the UN Refugee Agency.”
Frankly speaking, I felt insulted. Especially considering that the question I asked in my article – “What has the UN done to stop or at least curb constant tribal violence in Africa?” – was not deigned with an answer. And it probably never will, for one simple reason:

The UN hasn’t done shit.

Here we should mention an important fact: the Western consciousness cannot really perceive or comprehend the ESSENCE of the very Negroes for whose liberation and independence the starry-eyed liberals so tirelessly campaign.
Simply put, they are cannibals. In the most literal sense of the word. They are creatures that, while outwardly belonging to the human species, have zero sense of norms, principles, traditions and other things that a representative of a European civilization absorbs with mother’s milk. We are talking about “people” who have only recently climbed down from trees. Not even the most venerable anthropologist will be able to tell you how many tribes lived and still live in the Congo Basin, yet all these tribes are very different when it comes to traditions and lifestyle. What unites them is their attitude towards human life – none of them lend it any value. Murder is not considered a sin; the notion of sin is simply not there. A tribesman wants something, he goes and takes it. He wants to kill someone, he goes and kills. Murder of an outsider, let alone a White, merits even less attention. In short, not only are these creatures not equal to Whites, they can’t even hold a candle to other African tribes that have developed a semblance of civilization.
But one day, such a creature is given a rifle and told that he’s the boss now. He can do whatever he wants. Well, what do you think he’s going to do? Doesn’t take a genius to guess that he’ll go on a rampage, taking whatever strikes his fancy and raping anything that moves.
That’s pretty much what happened in Congo and other places in Africa where the natives were “liberated from colonial oppression”. Chaos and anarchy took the reins, with all that entails: robbery, rape, murder, arson, live target practice… The list can go on forever.
Who tried to oppose this? Well, definitely not the UN. Ever read Wilbur Smith’s novel “Dark of the Sun”? You’ll be surprised to find out that it was based on actual events - it were mercenaries, painted by the media as cutthroats and scum of the earth, who were busy rescuing people from villages and missions scattered all over the country. Of course, we are not going to use that novel as an accurate historical source, but it is far from being fiction, as Smith was a White African who grew up on that continent and understood it very well.
Who risked their lives rescuing White missionaries in Congo from hordes of bloodthirsty savages? The UN? You wish. Who took the city of Kindu from the Simbas? It was Mike Hoare’s 5 Commando, who shot the insurgents to hell and thus saved local Europeans from getting butchered with blunt machetes. Who freed hundreds of hostages in Stanleyville after Christophe Gbenye herded them into the main square and declared that they would all die in agony? The Belgian Paras, of course. They came and sowed death. Death to murderers and bandits. They did not give a rat’s ass about “human rights” and other claptrap. They had an enemy, and that enemy had to be destroyed. Not to mention that primitive cannibals who disembowel women for fun have nothing to do with humans. Period.

*cont*

*cont*
The UN, just like any other political eunuch, could do nothing but wring hands and call for “restoration of peace”. Except these goofs could not even begin guessing that peace in Africa is imposed with bayonets and bullets. One does not need a platoon of soldiers and a shipment of flamthrowers for that – a couple of bloody examples is more than enough to let everyone nearby know that robbery and murder will not go unpunished.
But seeing as the human rights idée fixe was the cornerstone of UN philosophy, these bumbling idiots could not bring themselves to accept such a state of things. Instead, they started going out of their way to create problems for people who in any way dared to curtail the rapidly spreading chaos. In some cases, they ended up getting their own noses bloody: for example, in December 1960 in Katanga, a tiny group of mercenaries led by Michel de Clary used three rinky-dink biplanes to wreak absolute havoc on Irish and Swedish UN task forces that outnumbered them three to one. Not only were they defeated, they turned tail and fled, while de Clary followed that victory up with destroying a Simba gang and taking control of several towns, without even bothering to catch a breather.
Such cases were more of an exception rather than a rule, though; UN troops rarely took part in armed conflict, preferring instead to keep peace by twiddling thumbs and visiting local pubs (source: The Savages by Ronald Hardy, 1968).
The main strong point of the UN was always in hurling baseless accusations, using double standards and giving airtime to murderous thugs like Nkomo and Lumumba. In 1976, Rhodesian forces destroyed a massive guerilla training camp in Nyadzonya. Several weeks after, Sadruddin Aga Khan, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, visited the camp and made a conclusion – the Rhodesians had massacred a bunch of peaceful refugees, including children and the elderly. That conclusion was subsequently voiced from a tribune in Geneva. The Rhodesian government was ready to provide irrefutable proof that the camp had nothing to do with refugees. Naturally, they were ignored, just as the 1978 atrocity by Nkomo’s bandits, who shot down a Rhodesian airliner with a MANPADS and then massacred the survivors. All Nkomo got for that was a verbal slap on the wrist in one of Geneva’s coffee rooms.
When one needed to accuse “the racist regime of Pretoria” of “unthinkable crimes against humanity”, the UN was right there. When SWAPO thugs were methodically massacring other tribes in South West Africa, the UN was nowhere to be found. Nor did it do anything to somehow quell the civil wars in Angola and Mosambique. Don’t even get me started on Rwanda: the genocide that took place there was monstrous even by African standards, while the UN suits were busy picking lint out of their navels. When China invaded Tibet and turned it into a bloodbath, the UN, despite its lofty rhetoric, didn’t do anything. But Rhodesia, a country that has never waged an offensive war in its entire history, was declared “a threat to the international world order”. It was the UN that helped get Nelson Mandela, a terrorist and a thug, out of prison – all while deftly avoiding any mention of victims of a terror campaign of the African National Congress, which he chaired.

In the photos attached to this article one can see mercenaries from Mike Hoare’s 5 Commando helping the civilians they had rescued. There is not a single blue helmet in sight.

any more Articles user, this is really interesting

checked

I sincerely thank you for this user

I'll try to keep them coming, but it will be slow. My schedule is quite busy.

Remember that 90-95% of intelligence agencies' work is subversion. What kind of memes are they spreading in Africa?

Hahaha! I bet CIAniggers have their hands tied to shitty methods and that they think that the same rules apply there as in Europe. After all, everybody is equal (to Europeans)!

I am glad that I do not support.

May I have the link please?

Alright user, just take your time in Translating those articles for us

Here are some screencaps for your work

*Here are the screencaps of your work

Bump

Bump x2

What happened to you after that? Were you suspended or expelled?

this guy, , is a shill

Maybe stop being a pussy and harden up and maybe you'll get one?

one is to think that both Rhodesia and South Africa would have been crushed by Israel if it was inevitable to the White Africans that they wouldn't want to be subterfuged by the likes of what happened in the US.

>forum.expeditionportal.com/threads/50799-Democratic-Republic-of-Congo-Lubumbashi-to-Kinshasa

end of the journey log is on page 48-50 (estimated) of the link

web.archive.org/web/20050324011020/http://www.livejournal.com:80/users/tiomkin/486688.html

This author's story is a bit weird. He is a walking trove of knowledge when it comes to Africa and a massive Rhodesiaboo/South Africaboo, but recently he has gotten involved with the Russian government and decided to close his blog to avoid bad publicity. All that remains is a bunch of archived articles, which I am gradually sorting out and saving.
Like I said, I'm terribly busy, so translated articles will be few and far between.

I can help. Ya ponimayu russki yazyk. spasibo za postom. Yes, the Russian Government is cowardly and tries to make itself look like the heroes of funding communist terrorist groups, but that's realpolitik i guess. Just don't tell Andrew Anglin that. The Muslims will cause more terrorism as a poetic justice, in my opinion, this should be encouraged. of course, if the muslims dare threaten us in near proximity, their lives are forfeit, but we need to make sure that it appears someone else did it, ie communists, or a different islamist group btw, thanks again so much for saving this.

The third and fourth picture is depressing because that is what our future will become. It's terrifying.

>

"give us money"
"this is not your country! you should go"
"also, give us money"

Surprised this hasn't been posted yet.

While I am translating another article by our Russian friend, have some Rhodesian political cartoons and an article written by Michael Pierce in 2002. Mind you, he volunteered for the Rhodesian Army and participated in the Bush War.

The Rhodesian Example

February 13, 2002

Some of us have suggested that blasting the Taliban into oblivion and occupying the entire country of Afghanistan just might not be the most effective way to destroy the Al Qaida terrorists. For this we have been called a lot of names and the unjustified assumption has been made that those of us who think that way must either be wimps or "soft on terror." Since I am neither of these things I've concluded that maybe some folks don't realize that there actually other tactics available that are both more effective in hurting the terrorists and more consistent with the classic Christian interpretation of the "just war." I remain dumbfounded that we began our attack on Al Qaida by wasting all that ordnance on the people who had not staged the attack upon us, giving the real enemy time to organize themselves and scatter.

My take on it has been from the beginning — attack the guys who did the "stunt" and tell the Taliban to stay out of our way. Make it plain that staying out of our way is very conducive to staying alive. Having divided Al Qaida from their hosts, hit them with whatever ordnance is available and do it right away. Is this totally unrealistic? Let's review the facts of how real soldiers dealt with real terrorists and see just how plausible this tactic can be.

It was the despicable Jimmy Carter that joined our nation to the unholy alliance with the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and Communist China and openly helped brutal and murderous communist bandits take down western cultures in southern Africa. Yep, that really happened and those of you who wander why some of us aren't so quick to jump on the government bandwagon need to consider this.

Despite the overwhelming force arrayed against them, the tiny, embattled country of Rhodesia gave the world an object lesson in how to fight terrorism. In 1978 the Rhodesians were to up the ante and show us all just what the term "economy of force mission" is all about.

The terrorists were staging in Zambia and had several large base camps near Lusaka. There were thousands of them in these base camps and they were well organized and well equipped. The crazed fanatics at the United Nations had embargoed Rhodesia while apostate Christian organizations like the World Council of Churches had joined with other liberals and left-wing extremists to supply and nurture these murderous terrorists. One might ask that if the United States was really engaged in a Cold War with the Soviet Union at that time, and if the security of our country and the free world really was on the line, then weren't the actions of Jimmy Carter and the organizations noted on the order of high treason? Just asking…

It's interesting to note that Rhodesia, a country with no interest whatsoever in South East Asian affairs, was one of the very few of our so-called allies to offer to support America in Vietnam with troops. They had been our allies in World War II and while the ill considered and murderous war in Vietnam was hardly a noble cause, the Rhodesians had none the less offered us their support simply because that is what allies do. Or used to do. The Rhodesians, like the Serbs, have learned that "ally" means something different to Americans than what it meant to them.

*cont*

*cont*

The short version is that during the first few years of freedom following the Unilateral Declaration of Independence from Britain Prime Minister Ian Smith's "renegade" government was one of the most ably managed and least governed countries in the world. The white people and educated blacks enjoyed a standard of living much like that in the United States or UK, while the tribal villagers had the highest standard of living in black Africa.

Then the Russians and the Chinese communists showed up and the Cubans — with mouths full of Marxist slogans and boatloads of guns and explosives — initially consisting mostly of landmines and submachine guns but later including late model East Bloc weaponry. Weapons that were employed against civilian farmers and tribal villagers… The terrorist incidents gradually escalated from isolated bandit attacks to full scale savagery.

To communist "fighters" their enemies are seen simply as criminals — the upper classes slated for "liquidation," and the lower classes for "re-education" and domination through unspeakable terror. Don't take my word for it. Read their own words — read Lenin or Mao and remember that their body count suggests that they meant the things they said. Then ask yourselves why this is not taught in our schools — it's a fair question in a country dominated by leftists and their tedious claims to the moral high ground.

The world ignored horrific attacks like the slaughter and mutilation of innocent tribal villagers, and the Viscount disaster — where terrorists shot down a passenger plane with a Russian strella missile, and then raped and butchered the survivors. Read the words of a Rhodesian pastor whose sermon "The Silence is Deafening" is a dreadful indictment of the West's response to that atrocity. Seeing how America in its current war on terrorism expects the whole world to get on board because of the presumed moral culpability of our enemies one can only wonder how that same America could blithely ignore acts of terrorism as brutal and deadly as that one.

The British disgraced themselves once and for all by refusing even to sell prosthetics to Rhodesia when a young farm girl lost her legs to a terrorist mine, planted by fanatics who were cheered on by those same Brits. Russian ships jammed Rhodesian communications and broke the daily "shackle" codes used by the military in the field so quickly that it was assumed that no comms were really secure. Rhodesia had few friends and the embargo began to bite deeply early on. The fight however, continued — the Rhodesians were anything but quitters.

By the mid seventies thousands of well organized terrorists were staging in Mozambique and Zambia, so called "front line" states. That translates into "countries where communist dictators had already seized control." I "visited" the camps in Mozambique myself and can testify to the truth of that statement. The camps in Zambia had a prior visit from a battle group best remembered by the call sign of the tactical air commander, "Green Leader." That was the operation that could have, and perhaps should have served as a model to the US when we attacked Afghanistan.

*cont*

*cont*

Terrorists were staging in Zambia and routinely crossing the Zambezi to murder and maim Rhodesian citizens. (Again — I am an eyewitness having been engaged in a rather nasty affair on the Zambezi where we knocked out a terrorist group coming across the river from Zambia) Zambia could have legitimately been construed as an enemy and the Rhodesians could have readily bombed Lusaka. They did not — they were able to focus on fighting their real enemies who were the ZIPRA and ZANLA terrorists cadres so beloved of the leftist media in Peking, Moscow, Britain, and America.

The Rhodesians had a major advantage over the United States, however, when it came to fighting terrorists. They weren't concerned for world opinion or coalitions and had no thoughts of "nation building," those folks were focused! Plus, the government was actually responding to the will of the people for if there ever was a government that was "of the people, by the people, for the people," it was that of the Rhodesians. It makes a difference when you are defending the people as opposed to defending some broadly defined "national interest" that somehow never seems to benefit anyone you know.

The Rhodesians were wonderful improvisers and put together an assault group with obsolete jet fighter-bombers, helicopters, and old Dakotas for the paratroops. The forces used for raids into host countries were extremely lean by modern standards. Less than a hundred paratroopers and some SAS types plus air force personnel, some medics and engineers. They had learned to coordinate their forces very smoothly and bring overwhelming force against a specific target. The strike force operated quite similarly to American Special Forces in Afghanistan as far as tactics go — small groups of well-trained men with a lot more radios and machine guns than normal infantry. That got them a lot of bang for the buck.

So one bright day these Rhodesians brought death to the terrorists in Zambia without harming a single Zambian civilian or soldier, and they did it with incredible panache. How? Try this on for size:

"Tower, this is Green Leader, this is the Rhodesian Air Force. We are now in control of your airspace and no plane will land or take off until further notice. Planes in the air will circle in a holding pattern that we will assign. We will give you further instructions as we proceed." Green Leader was the code name of the Rhodesian air commander who simply took control of the airspace over Lusaka and despite the Zambians having an air force that included Mig 17 interceptors (the equal of the Rhodesian's Hawker Hunters) those folks got real wise real fast and froze in place. Green Leader and his small force of Hunters effectively neutralized the Zambian armed forces for several long critical hours.

Meantime, back at the terrorist base camps, Armageddon. First, "Golf" Bombs (homemade concussion bombs — very powerful) to daze those already dozy characters, more strafing and bombing, then airborne folks came in on helicopters with light infantry weapons to finish them off. Paratrooper "Stop Groups" were dropped further out from the target area and sealed off escape from the base camps. Few terrorists were able to escape. Thousands of "Terrs" as they were called, would butcher no more civilians and chant no more communist slogans. They had been wiped out without ever raising any effective resistance at all. When the raid was complete, tons of firearms and munitions were airlifted back to Rhodesia or blown up. When the assault forces had completed their work, Green Leader calmly and politely returned control of the Zambian air space back to Zambia!

*cont*

*cont*

Zambian zeal for the terrorist cause was somewhat dampened by this, as one might well imagine! Bombing the Zambians would have made them angry and they would have called for revenge and it could well have spiraled into that many more deaths. Instead, the Zambian government got a revealing look at their own vulnerability without suffering the indignity (and casualties) of an all-out attack. As for the terrorists? They were the devil's problem after that.

It should be noted that photographs of the camps and the weaponry seized there were made available to the western press but were ignored. The LA Times spoke of an attack by Rhodesian mercenaries on a refugee camp. Does the media have a leftist agenda? You be the judge.

The Rhodesians were able to strike this blow because they knew perfectly well that they were fighting for survival and that could be attained only by making the best possible use of their military. They were minding their own business and not intervening in the affairs of others, and even in their most awesome displays of force were careful to target only the guilty and limit so called "collateral damage." There was no antiwar movement in Rhodesia. Fathers, sons, and even grandfathers (Dad's Army) did their call-ups in the army or police reserve.

The terrorist enemy, on the other hand, followed the tried and true communist tactic of striking civilians, black and white; torture and mutilation were their stock and trade. Is it unfair to ask why the American government supported those people?

The Rhodesians eventually went down, betrayed at last in their naiveté by their "friends" in the British commonwealth. Although by then the country was under the aegis of a bi-racial government led by the Bishop Abel Muzarewa, this was not enough for the international community. So called "peace-keeping" forces from the Commonwealth kept a close eye on the Rhodesian forces while abandoning the helpless villagers to the depredations and intimidation of the terrorist forces — it was obvious when it was too late, that the door should never have been opened to them. The socialist government of Britain, like their more overtly communist allies, was only happy when the thugs were running the show.

I believe it is time to ask ourselves, as Americans, if we wish to follow this path, and hand our civilization over to the third world and forsake for ever the traditions of our western cultural heritage, and sink like Rhodesia, into a mire of inefficiency, corruption and brutality. It is the path we are on; it is the path down which political correctness is leading us and it is the cherished dream of our enemies that we should do so. Why Americans are throwing their freedom at the feet of a government that is leading us down that path is beyond me and sometimes I fear that ultimately we have just betrayed too many friends, murdered too many unborn babies, and stuck our noses into too many places where we had no business, and that perhaps the good Lord has finally just given us over to our own depravity.

There is an answer of course. There is no rule set in stone that says we must capitulate to the left, that we must answer only to those whose policies are those of savage and depraved beasts.

Every wicked agenda has an ultimate goal — to see where America is heading you have only to look to modern day Zimbabwe, where once there were moderation and good manners, and now there is epidemic, starvation and depravity.

Why do we as Americans act against our own best interests? Why do we allow ourselves to be ruled by the left wing press and outright criminals like Ted Kennedy, John McCain and Bill Clinton? Why is a man like George Bush, whose dream is to throw open our borders to the riff raff of the world considered a hero by so many? I say to you that we can still repent of our evil and foolish ways; that we can still restore our society and dismantle the apparatus of empire, but it will take commitment and integrity. We will have to stop murdering our children and nurturing the worst elements in our culture, and I suppose that is just too much to ask. It would be inconvenient, and inconvenience is more than we are willing to put up with in this postmodern Dark Age in which we find ourselves.

Some more fokofpolisiekar

...

Rina Hugo + Border war photos

Afrikaans Metal song about bringing back the death sentence

...

You don't need to make up these rituals, they already exist from the European nigger Powder Age.
Look for a German book with the name "Geheimnisvoller Heldenschatz, oder der vollständige egyptische Magische Schild", its from 1750 and is basically full of the superstitious beliefs of German Soldiers from that time. Among them are rituals to curse and uncurse rifles, make a bulletproof vest and create bullets that will always hit their target.

Thank for the translated articles.

Still stuck in S. Africa. We're stuck with what we're stuck with.

South African government are actually keeping the expats from leaving? That's spooky.

All right you niggers, I have finally finished translating another article by this Russian Africanist guy. Better buckle the fuck up, this is a huge read. Some of the articles presented within are directly quoted from the source, but I had to translate those I could not find the source for by hand.

Jimmy Carter, the U.S. and destruction of the Republic of Rhodesia

In autumn of 2009, an article named “Ian Smith Was Right” was published by a newspaper The Zimbabwean. The title is a bit misleading, as the article’s text makes no mentions of the late Rhodesian Prime Minister. The sentiment behind the title is conveyed correctly, though – Zimbabwe is a textbook example of absolute and utter failure. The idea itself is hardly new, as normal people have voiced it before numerous times (some of the most sober-minded used to say as far back as in the seventies that terrorists should not be given any power, only to immediately get denounced as racists as loons), but some of our leftist liberal friends (those who have not yet lost the ability to discern evil from good) are only now starting, albeit slowly and reluctantly, to acknowledge it. The article’s author is also quite interesting – one James Carter, a second-rate publicist and a rather fecund writer who happened to work as the President of the United States for some time. To hear from Carter about Mugabe ruining the country is akin to… I don’t know, maybe Jesse Jackson admitting that Nathan Forrest’s KKK had a constructive beginning. Surprising, to say the least.

The beauty of the situation is in the fact that Jimmy Carter is directly responsible for destruction of Rhodesia. He is not alone, of course – disappearance of this state from the world’s political map was aided by Great Britain, USSR, China, OAU member countries and the Republic of South Africa (heartbreaking, I know). But Carter, as a leader of one of the superpowers and shaper of its foreign policy, bears direct responsibility for one of the most politically and economically developed countries of Southern Africa getting cynically flushed down the drain in the name of speculative and abstract principles such as “democracy”, “universal human values”, “triumph of humanistic ideas” and other tripe

Anyway, here’s the full article, followed by my comments.

Ian Smith was right
Written by Jimmy Carter
Tuesday, 22 September 2009

As president, I worked actively with African leaders and the British to change the apartheid regime of Rhodesia into a democratic Zimbabwe in 1980.
Eight years later, The Carter Center established one of our first agriculture projects in Zimbabwe, at that time known as a breadbasket for the region and setting an example in economic stability, education and health care.

Now, after almost three decades of governmental corruption, mismanagement and oppression, Zimbabwe has become a basket case and an international embarrassment. A group of leaders known as the Elders, to which I belong, have monitored this crisis, while realizing that its resolution must come from within Africa. Time for action is now running out, a reality forcefully conveyed to me on a recent five-day fact-finding trip to the region.
There is great aversion among even the most enlightened African leaders to "interference" from former colonial powers and their allies, including the United States. However, these same leaders have been reluctant to assume responsibility for resolving the political stalemate and the escalating humanitarian catastrophe.
I joined former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Graça Machel, women's activist and wife of Nelson Mandela, in South Africa on Nov. 21 with the intention of traveling on to Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe. However, when we met with former South African president Thabo Mbeki, the facilitator designated by other African leaders to mediate the political dispute in Zimbabwe, he delivered a message from Harare that our visas were denied and we could not proceed.
We had anticipated this possibility and held a series of comprehensive discussions in Johannesburg with delegations that came from Zimbabwe to meet us, including executives of international nonprofit and governmental agencies and a wide range of other stakeholders including leaders of Zimbabwe's civil society. What we learned of the situation was even worse than our expectations. We also met with Botswana President Ian Khama, South African President Kgalema Motlanthe, ANC Party President (and prospective South African President) Jacob Zuma, and Zimbabwe's opposition party leaders Morgan Tsvangirai and Arthur Mutambara.
The current political and humanitarian crisis originated with a fraudulent presidential election in March 2008, with Tsvangirai probably winning an actual majority against President Robert Mugabe. Orchestrated violence and brutal persecution of Tsvangirai and his supporters forced him to withdraw
from the forced runoff and leave the country. Mugabe then declared himself president. African political leaders largely ignored reports of fraud by their own election observers, and eventually negotiated a power-sharing agreement that Mugabe and Tsvangirai signed on Sept. 15. Unfortunately,Mugabe has not ceded any real power to his opponent and the trend toward a national tragedy has accelerated.
The official inflation rate is now 231 million percent, and actually 2,000 times greater. Thousands of people stand in line daily to receive a tiny allowance from their own bank accounts - approximately 2 cents - an amount that is insufficient to buy even half a loaf of bread. Meanwhile, top government officials and other privileged people can exchange Zimbabwe money at a favorable rate and profit greatly from these transactions. They shop inspecial stores.
Schoolteachers receive only one U.S. dollar a month, and cannot afford transportation to work. Attendance has dropped from 85 to 20 percent, with attending students mostly wanting to obtain a morsel of food. All universities are closed.
A planting shortage of seed and fertilizer will result in a failed harvest, and the World Food Program estimates that 50 percent of the population will need food assistance before April 2009. Relief agencies report thatavailable food supplies are channeled to ruling party loyalists, deliberately starving opposition party leaders.
All major hospitals and most emergency clinics no longer operate, and police have clashed with doctors and nurses who insist on treating their patients.

Uncontrolled sewage and lack of clean water has resulted in cholera outbreaks in all 10 provinces.
Zimbabwe is battling a nationwide cholera epidemic that has killed 425 people since late August and infected more than 11,000, according to government statistics.
As many as 4 million people have left Zimbabwe, seeking food, medical care and freedom from abuse, and the cholera outbreak has made neighbouring nations increasingly wary of accepting immigrants. There are courageous people in Johannesburg who with limited means are helping alleviate the immense suffering. We visited Central Methodist church, where Bishop Paul Verryn feeds and houses 2,000 refugees in the church's rooms and corridors each night.
Without a political solution, the economic and social fabric of society will continue its free-fall. When Mugabe cannot pay his army and enormous civil service, the result may be a resort to internecine violence and a failed state, similar to Somalia.
African leaders, especially in the neighboring Southern African Development Community, must confront Mugabe and force him to comply with negotiated political agreements and share real governing authority with Tsvangirai and the opposition party. If action by these leaders continues to be ineffective, the African Union and the United Nations must take action. A first step, short of intercession, could be to send independent fact-finding teams to Zimbabwe to obtain information directly from major donors, international relief agencies, medical doctors, teachers, farmers and other
citizens who have described their experiences to us.
In the meantime, there is a desperate need for food, medicine and cash contributions to established humanitarian agencies including CARE, World Vision and Save the Children - or to Bishop Verryn. It is counterproductive to contribute money that can be confiscated by the Zimbabwe government.

For starters, I need to say the following:
Jimmy Carter is a liar.
I can even repeat that:
Jimmy Carter is a hardcore, egregious liar.

He was a liar throughout his presidency and remains one to this day. It’s not news, though – many American presidents suffered and still suffer from a penchant for lies, and some even lie under oath (for the sake of justice I’d like to say that Russia, the UK and pretty much the rest of the world are not any better in this regard, but we are discussing America here). However, Carter does not lie all the time and never tells genuine, 100 percent lies. As a phrase attributed to Goebbels says, “A good lie should contain a grain of truth”. Carter does not lie when describing the disaster that is Zimbabwe – famine, cholera, tyranny, incredible inflation that has become a household name. No, this is all true. Here’s what’s not:

James Carter might not have known (and if he did, it did not faze him – who cares about the truth, anyway?) that Rhodesia, unlike its neighbouring South Africa, never had apartheid. Moreover, Rhodesia did not have any laws discriminating against persons based on the color of their skin whatsoever. There were cultural customs and traditions responsible for a relatively separate existence of the races, but almost every country has those, to a degree. There were traditions that would have struck an American as weird – for example, despite the Rhodesian Army being racially integrated (with 70 percent of its personnel being African), two of its units, Rhodesian Light Infantry and SAS, were traditionally White. Such was their privilege, and the entire military, White or black, took it for granted and never tried to argue against it. Side by side with them served the Selous Scouts, 75 percent of whom were Negroes. Skin color was not an obstacle preventing Rhodesian soldiers from working together. The same, to a certain extent, was true for civil administration, business, etc.

There was not even a whiff of democracy in Zimbabwe’s future, and that was clear for everyone who had a head screwed on properly. Mugabe never really tried to conceal his plans for creating a one-party Marxist state, which he carried out to the letter. A devious politician, raised by Jesuit missionaries and Maoist ideology, he would agree to any compromise, as long as it helped him achieve the ultimate goal. Saying that Mugabe had anything to do with democracy is akin to considering tigers and leopards strict vegetarians – a public display of complete ignorance of African realia (forgivable if you are a car mechanic, not much so if you are a high-ranking politician) and basic concepts and principles of politics (unforgivable for any politician).

Another of Carter’s lies. Zimbabwe was considered the breadbasket of Africa till 1980. Even Mugabe’s most fanatical supporters reluctantly admit that it was under the White minority that the country achieved its highest agricultural output. Same goes for state spending per capita. As for “economic stability, education and health care”, these were old stocks, so to say. The basics of education and healthcare developed by Whites, along with economic stability provided by Whites (during the first years of his rule, Mugabe tried not to interfere with the economy too much, knowing who was responsible for the country’s welfare) allowed Zimbabwe to carry Rhodesia’s mantle of a developed country for some time.
(Again for the sake of justice, I am going to repeat myself and say that the South African Republic also contributed to the country’s destruction, but this topic deserves a separate article. Transformation of Rhodesia from a prospering country into utter ruin is first and foremost Mugabe’s fault, but RSA played a role in it as well, sad as it is.)

Ol’ Jimmy walked into his own trap here. As it is said above, the Carter Center established an agricultural project in Zimbabwe in 1988. By that time, according to Carter himself, the government had an 8-year record of corruption, mismanagement and oppression. This begs a simple question: What made the Carter Center organize a project in a corrupt country – a project requiring some serious investment, no less? Or wasn’t Carter bothered by corruption, oppression, etc. back then? (The question of what stopped Carter from organizing a similar project in a NON-corrupt country that existed till 1980 is off the table due to being rhetorical.)

Ah, so now the resolution must come from within Africa. Funny how just 30 years ago Jimmy Carter thought (and was adamant about it) that the Rhodesian problem must be resolved by the international community. Back then, in the 70’s, Rhodesia was ruled by Whites, which seemed to be a strong argument in favor of an external resolution. Today it is ruled by blacks, and the resolution must be internal. The former POTUS is nothing if not consistent.

This is the MOST monumental of all lies ever told by James Earl Carter Jr., given that he deftly shirks having to answer the key question: Who bears direct responsibility for the chain of events that has led to the humanitarian catastrophe? The head of which state obstinately impeded the resolution of the “Rhodesian problem”? Who made the decisions that resulted in a bloodthirsty tyrant taking over a country? I doubt Jimmy Carter will EVER answer any of these questions.

I find it appropriate to quote here a fragment of Pat Buchanan’s speech to the members of John Birch Society, made on October 24, 1978:

“Western influence wanes; civil war impends. And culpability rests squarely with the fools at Foggy Bottom and in the British Foreign Office, foremost among whom are Andrew Young and his salmon-faced traveling companion, Foreign Minister David Owen. God, what a mess they have made of it!
Seven months ago, in a belated but bold maneuver, Prime Minister Ian Smith accepted Henry Kissinger's central demand: a commitment to black majority rule. His regime agreed to a New Year's transfer of power through free elections and universal suffrage. In return, the white minority would be guaranteed its property rights and political freedom. A timetable was agreed upon for the gradual transfer to black dominance of army, courts, civil service and police.
At that juncture, the opportunity was present for the Western powers to step in, recognize the "internal settlement,” lift economic sanctions and provide the embryonic regime with diplomatic recognition and the economic and military assistance needed to survive.
We did not. Fearful of Cuban intervention, fretting the reaction of the militant Marxist states in Africa, the United States and Great Britain not only withheld support; we joined the external conspiracy by disparaging the agreement, maintaining the embargo, and fawning upon the guerrilla leaders, Joshua Nkomo and Robert Mugabe, as the authentic nationalists.
Seven months later, the military situation has deteriorated to where elections may not be held; the internal settlement is on the precipice of collapse. And the American and British diplomats who plunged the dagger in Rhodesia’s back are even now reminding us how they predicted it could not survive.
But how could it have been otherwise? The black and white people of Rhodesia who looked to the West have been deserted by the West. The black guerrillas who look to the Soviet Union and Cuba have received all support short of war.
For months Young and Owen have been lathering up Nkomo in the hope he would join an all-parties conference. Last week, they received the reward for their sycophancy: Nkomo announced the conference dead and buried, and professed himself willing only to accept Smith’s surrender.
One need not be a follower of Ian Smith to concur in his judgment that the greatest contributing factor to our failure has been that the American and British governments, the leaders of the free world, have sided with our enemies, the Patriotic Front…
Why? Is it in the interest of the West to have the new Zimbabwe ruled by people who shoot down civilian airliners and execute the survivors, including children? Like Lady Macbeth, we and our British cousins will be a long time wiping our hands clean of the blody stains of this latest betrayal.”

The position that Jimmy Carter’s administration took in regard to Rhodesia was sufficient for sober-minded Americans to brand them as traitors, and reasonably so. They sincerely could not understand where and when did the United States (and the UK) obtain the moral and constitutional right to dictate national policy to other countries. Upon his rise to power, Jimmy Carter has rather clearly outlined the new trend in America’s foreign policy: “The U.S. must actively participate in internal affairs of any country that the U.S. deems to be in the zone of its fundamental interests”. I can’t really say that this wasn’t the case before, but under Carter, this trend assumed new shapes and became seasoned with “human rights”. The latter term was widely used for political purposes; I do not rule out Carter himself sincerely believing in all that starry-eyed humanistic drivel, but his administration, seeing a wonderful new means to exert pressure, immediately started using it to the max. Double standards and goalpost switching became the norm – for example, the form of government was now emphasized exclusively, while other aspects, such as the extent to which the government controls its citizens, were disregarded and so on.
The most sinister role in the U.S. foreign policy under Carter was played by Andrew Young, a Protestant preacher and a Congressman who also happened to be a friend and associate of MLK. In 1977 Carter appointed him a resident U.S. representative in the UN – a decision that proved to be fateful. The far right did not refer to Young as anything other than “rabid nigger”, and they were not far from the truth. Despite being a priest – someone whose very title implies being above prejudice – Young was a typical militant black supremacist who, by sheer luck, managed to gain a modicum of power. Believing himself to be invincible, Young took to violating (albeit covertly) American law, but was eventually caught and forced to quietly resign. Unfortunately, before getting kicked out, he managed to royally screw up a multitude of affairs and completely ruin the image of the United States worldwide.

Young possessed a peculiar trait that can be interpreted both as good or bad, depending on the person: he could not help himself from speaking his mind. A mind that brimmed with racial hatred and other things that Young considered important, even if the Presidential Administration did not share his opinions (inexcusable for a politician of such rank). For example, he once publicly called Ayatollah Khomeini “some kind of saint” and “a pleasant person in general”. For Young, presence of Cuban armed forces in Africa was “a much-anticipated stabilizing force”, Israelis were “stubborn obstructionists”, and members of the Palestine Liberation Organization were “respectable citizens and representatives of the opposition”. That last one got him fired, as he held covert negotiations with PLO in disregard of a strict presidential decree prohibiting American diplomats from doing so.

Another of Young’s traits was mendacity. He had absolutely no qualms with backpedaling, recanting earlier statements and lying under oath (just as he lied to Secretary of State Cyrus Vance about the meeting with PLO members). He only apologized when cornered with undeniable facts. For example, in spring of 1977, Young told a BBC journalist that British policy on racial issues in regard to Rhodesia and South Africa was “rather cowardly”. He then went on to say “Britain’s behavior makes me seriously think that it were the British who invented racism, seeing as they did more than any other nation in the world to legitimize it.” Such public statements by an official United States UN representative were followed by a massive scandal, and Young was forced to apologize, although he did so in private, to his British colleague Ivor Richard. According to Richard, he “was rather surprised to hear Young saying such things to the BBC and could not believe that was the official viewpoint of the U.S. government. After that interview, Mr. Young met with me and said that it seemed he had made a mistake”. (Sentinel Star, April 8, 1977).

Richard, however, had every reason to believe that Young’s words represented an official position of the U.S., given that Young wasn’t just a political ally of Jimmy Carter, but also his close friend and member of his inner circle. He was among the few people who had direct access to the president at any time. Carter trusted him unquestioningly, and Young exploited that trust unscrupulously, feeding the president disinformation that constantly put him in a favorable light. However, Carter hardly was the innocent sheep in this regard – after all, he was fully conscious of his actions when he tasked Young with highly sensitive missions that required adroitness and the skill of selling black for white.

In 1977, Young paid two visits to Africa . During the first one, he expressed an opinion that USSR- and China-backed terrorists deserve sympathy and understanding, as they are forced to use violence to attain power “as last resort – the desperate situation they are in pushed them towards this”. During the second visit, Young went even further: at the so-called UN Conference on Zimbabwe and Namibia, held in Maputo, Mozambique, he declared his intention to “dispel the scepticism displayed by military leaders of liberation movements of the African South, along with their disappointment with the U.S. policy regarding Africa” (Houston Post, May 20, 1977). In other words, Young made it clear that the United States government and personally President Carter were siding with the terrorists.

On 18th and 19th of May 1977, secret talks between U.S. Vice President Walter Mondale and South African Prime Minister John Vorster were held in Vienna. This was the first time either of the countries involved such high-ranking politicians to discuss a problem. Naturally, both the press and the public suspected that something really major was going on, and they were right. The bulletin published by Associated Press on June 5 of the same year was titled “White supremacy is over, says Carter to the peoples of Africa”. Here’s a fragment:

Vorster left the talks extremely displeased with the U.S. policy and “the Free World’s intentions to support terrorist movements of Communist nature”. However, despite him declaring that RSA would not allow any country to interfere with its internal affairs, he made clear Pretoria’s openness towards any American and British offers regarding Rhodesia.

Associated Press:

Vice President Mondale knew full well that Rhodesian forces’ cross-border raids represented a response to numerous terrorist incursions from neighboring countries. But he did not care. The United States wanted the South African Republic to pressure Rhodesia into ceasing resistance to terrorists. RSA did not really mind strong-arming Rhodesia into curtailing its anti-terrorist activity, but on condition that the U.S. would do the same in regard to Zambia and Mozambique. For the U.S. this would have been a piece of cake, at least with Zambia (Mozambique was firmly locked in the Soviet orbit, and Americans could not have influenced it even if they wanted to). But Carter Administration only wanted Rhodesians to lay down their arms, so Vorster’s offer was refused.

Associated Press:

Rhodesians eventually wised up to the threat that Jimmy Carter’s policies posed for them. In September of 1977, Rowan Cronje, Rhodesian Minister of Labor and Social Welfare, accused the Carter government of double standards:

In the meantime, the Carter Administration kept publicly claiming that the U.S. does not interfere with other states’ internal affairs and maintains “strict neutrality” in this regard. People have gotten so fed up with these repeated claims that the word “neutral” itself has taken on a tongue-in-cheek meeting. An article titled “End to sanctions?”, published by Newsweek on April 30 1979, features a photo of Andrew Young and ZIPRA leader Joshua Nkomo talking to each other animatedly. The caption to the photo said: “Nkomo and Young in 1977: just how ‘neutral’ is the U.S. towards Rhodesia?”
Carter’s non-stop claims of alleged neutrality of the United States towards Rhodesia have eventually resulted in a storm of criticism from senators. In autumn of 1978, California Republican Samuel Hayakawa said the following in a public interview (US News & World Report, October 30, 1978):
The world certainly did not lack for “neutral” organizations, either. Here’s what’s written in an Associated Press bulletin dated with September 28, 1978:

Britain was also big on “neutrality”. UPI, October 28, 1978:

Timing of the latter article is bitterly ironic, given that just a few days prior to its publication, Prime Minister Ian Smith remarked that the Free World refuses to sell Rhodesia even a toy gun so that it could defend itself, all while eagerly arming terrorists. In his comment on the news of Britain supplying weapons (with a total cost of $16 million) to Zambia, he said that even despite the sheer volume of armaments headed to Zambia, Rhodesia will take any measures it deems necessary to defend itself.

As it was said by one of the readers in his letter to the Soldier of Fortune magazine: “If such actions by the U.S. can be called neutrality, maybe the U.S. government would be so kind to explain what neutrality is?”

Unfortunately, due to extreme pressure both from the communist bloc and the Free World, Ian Smith was forced to seek a way out of the crisis. In order to prevent the country from descending into chaos, he had no choice but to negotiate with the saner part of black nationalists – chieftain Jeremia Chirau, reverend Ndabaningi Sithole and bishop Abel Muzorewa – and eventually they reached an agreement. Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo refused to take part in the negotiations, declaring their intent to continue the “just war of liberation” (with overt support of communist countries and covert approval of the U.S. and Britain) and declining to recognize any agreements made with the Smith government.

The plan proposed by Smith was called the "Internal Settlement" or the "Salisbury Agreement." He provided for the creation of a provisional coalition government for the period of the transfer of power to the black majority (through free elections on the "one person - one vote" principle). The new constitution guaranteed power the country’s black majority while providing guarantees to the white minority - including a certain number of seats in the parliament. Parliamentary representation of whites was sufficient to block constitutional amendments that could result in usurpation of power.

The "Salisbury Agreements" were approved by representatives of nationalist movements (with the exception of Mugabe and Nkomo), as well as South Africa. After that, Ian Smith decided to enlist the support of the United States. In the issue of the Saturday Evening Post for May-June 1978, his "Open Letter to the American People" was published:

To convey his message to the U.S. population directly, Prime Minister Ian Smith applied for an American visa in his bid to visit the country. It is worth recalling that the U.S. State Department issued visas to terrorists like Joshua Nkomo without delay, although the latter (in particular, in an interview with the BBC) openly acknowledged the destruction of a civil aircraft and subsequent extermination of survivors by his guerrillas. The State Department was not bothered by these minor details, though. However, when Ian Smith applied for the same visa, it turned out that the Carter administration does not have the slightest desire to let the Rhodesian Prime Minister speak to the Americans. The State Department went as far as trying to ignore the fact that Smith's invitation to visit the U.S. was signed by twenty-seven senators. Eventually, having yielded to the insistent demands of Jesse Helms, a North Carolina Republican Senator the State Department reluctantly issued visas to Smith and his African companions.

When the word of Ian Smith receiving an American visa got out, the Soviet Union immediately branded this “a shameful page in American history”. Interestingly, senators Dick Clark and Frank Church said approximately the same thing; however, when asked about whether they consider terrorist Joshua Nkomo receiving the same visa shameful, they refused to comment.
Before leaving Salisbury, Ian Smith explained to the press the purpose of his visit to the U.S.:

However, Ian Smith underestimated the duplicity of the U.S. government. Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State who previously urged Smith to accept American proposals for resolving the Rhodesian question, now refused to support them. Moreover, he denied that the U.S. promised to support the Smith regime - in spite of what he had said at meetings with the Rhodesian Prime Minister earlier. Simply put, the US did not accept any reforms carried out within Rhodesia and an internal solultion of the country’s problems. The U.S. - that is, President Carter and his administration - was satisfied with only one thing: an external solution of the issue, exactly in the way Washington saw it.

In Washington, Ian Smith and Ndabaningi Sithole managed to meet with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and British Ambassador Peter Jay. Unfortunately, attempts to convince the U.S. and UK representatives to recognize the Salisbury Agreement were unsuccessful - Vance and Jay insisted that Mugabe and Nkomo should have participated in the agreement, ignoring the counterargument about them being leaders of terrorist organizations involved in warfare against civilian population. Smith tried to get an audience with Carter, but from the White House came a polite but icy answer: Mr. Smith should consider himself immensely lucky for being allowed to meet at least with the Secretary of State.

At a time when Smith and his fellow Africans were in the United States, the Rhodesian Security Forces delivered a powerful blow to terrorist bases in Zambia. The Carter administration immediately condemned the operation, calling it "a barbaric act of aggression," and made it clear that Smith's further presence in the United States was undesirable. Joshua Nkomo, in turn, stated that he does not consider it possible to even think about talks with Smith, since he does not intend to negotiate with killers, "preferring to talk with them in the language of arms instead" (Houston Chronicle, October 22, 1978).

In review of Smith's visit to the U.S., US News & World Report wrote on October 23, 1978:

In the meantime, Henry Kissinger, having resigned from his duties as Secretary of State, simultaneously retracted his previous statements. US News & World Report of October 30, 1978:

In fact, the Rhodesian delegation returned from the United States empty-handed. Terrorists of the Patriotic Front took this as a sign that the days of Whites were numbered. In November 1978, Robert Mugabe published the so-called "Appeal to the people of Rhodesia," in which, among other things, it was said that the ZANU party intends to sentence 50 prominent Africans (chiefs and civil servants) to death if they do not immediately renounce their recognition of the Salisbury Agreement.

Essentially, these agreements marked the beginning of the end for White Rhodesia. The main question was: To whom will the country’s reins go? Moderate and relatively sane black nationalists who were fine with gradual reforms, or terrorists exterminating the civilian population? Ian Smith preferred the former, Jimmy Carter and Andrew Young insisted on the latter.

As for these “moderate” African nationalists, they certainly were not cannibals compared to Mugabe and Nkomo. But neither were they sinless angels, even though the two leaders (Muzorewa and Sithole) were dignitaries. They agreed to guarantee the rights of the White minority under the new regime - but in reality, these guarantees could easily be abolished, as it was everywhere in black Africa’s newly independent states. Here’s one interesting fact: after the signing of the Salisbury Agreements, Rhodesian counterintelligence discovered a plot headed by Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole aimed at "physically eliminating" Ian Smith. Smith decided to let the case slide, not taking any measures with respect to Sithole due to how important and volatile the political climate was at that moment. He limited himself to summoning the reverend, informing him that his conspiracy had been busted and asked for his criminal organization to be dissolved. Sithole obeyed.

Before Smith stood a task of great importance - to convince the people of Rhodesia to accept the Salisbury Agreement. The document needed approval via a referendum - without it, it remained an empty declaration. And Smith had to make sure that the citizens of the country believed that the country needed the new government.

It can hardly be said that the issue of accepting or refusing the Salisbury Agreements has split the country’s population, but the controversy it generated was hot enough to cause a few burns. In the past, when vital issues were discussed, the population of Rhodesia was virtually monolithic - in November 1964, the referendum on future independence yielded the following results: 58 076 for and 6 101 against, i.e. 9: 1. Now the population has become far more thoughtful.

UPI, January 12, 1979:
Smith, who until then had no trouble explaining to the audience of 500 people why he was campaigning for a new multiracial government, was forced to make excuses. "It is not on my own that I made this decision," he said. - Foreign powers forced us to accept what they call the rule of the black majority. In these conditions, we are trying to get out of the situation with minimal losses. " Smith then asked the people to participate in the January 30 referendum and say yes to a new constitution that presupposed majority rule and a mixed government.

When Smith was asked for guarantees against those two (Muzorewa and Sithole) simply abolishing the constitution once in power, the Prime Minister replied:

On January 30, 1979, 66,300 of 94,700 registered voters came to the polling stations. More than 85% of respondents voted for the new constitution and the new government. This was a majority vote by any and all standards.
Neither Robert Mugabe nor Joshua Nkomo recognized this referendum. Moreover, they said that now the "war of liberation" (i.e. open terrorism) will break out with renewed vigor. And in this respect, they kept their word - on February 12, just a little less than two weeks after the referendum, a gang of ZIPRA terrorists shot down a Rhodesian Airlines passenger flight (flight 827) with the help of a Strela-2 MANPADS that they had received from the USSR. Unlike the previous incident (flight 825, September 3, 1978) in this case, all 59 passengers and crew members perished.
In his address to the nation, Ian Smith directly blamed the United States and Britain for the incident, due to their demonstrative coddling of terrorists:
Neither the U.S. nor Britain condemned the terrorist act committed by Nkomo’s goons. No official in the governments of these countries made a single statement that would even slightly resemble reproach. The only reaction of official circles in the U.S. and Britain was silence.

Despite the intensification of the terrorist onslaught, the agreements adopted in Salisbury were implemented. At the end of February 1979, Jan Smith attended the last session of the parliament. He called it a historic event:

On 20 April 1979, general elections were held in Rhodesia. Unsurprisingly, terrorist groups ZANLA and ZIPRA refused to participate in them. To ensure proper conduct of elections, the Rhodesian Armed Forces executed several operations, including counterattacking the bases of militants located outside the country. Immediately, the United Nations, the United States and Great Britain condemned both the actions of the Rhodesian army and the very idea of free elections:

In the same April 1979, shortly before the elections, the Rhodesian Security Forces conducted another cross-border operation - a raid into Zambia with the goal of assassinating Joshua Nkomo. Rhodesian special forces appeared in Lusaka, the capital of Zambia - which caused panic both in the country’s government and in neighboring states. Unfortunately, Nkomo managed to slip away (it is still unclear why - after the operation there were persistent rumors that a leak of secret information occurred and the British managed to warn the leader of ZIPRA in time).

LA Times - Washington Post News Service of April 14, 1979:

In the attempt on Nkomo there was one aspect that slipped the attention of the press but not of certain agencies of certain superpowers: the soldiers of the Rhodesian Security Forces managed to enter Lusaka, the capital of the neighboring state, without encountering even the slightest resistance. If Rhodesia really wanted to invade Zambia or Mozambique, these countries would capitulate in a few days. Needless to say, the news about the daring raid in Zambia has sent President Carter's administration into apoplexy.

Elections in Rhodesia were held at the appointed time and without any excesses, despite attempts by terrorists to disrupt the process. Bishop Abel Muzorewa won. "68 unofficial observers from the United States, Britain, Australia and a number of European states said that the elections were free and fair, as far as possible in the conditions of a country at war" (Associated Press, April 25, 1979).
Moreover, a commission under chairmanship of Lord Boyd presented the government of Her Majesty with a large report which unequivocally confirmed that the elections were honest. The Report of the Boyd Commission unambiguously regarded this event as a triumph of the new government of Rhodesia. However, on June 7, 1979, Jimmy Carter called these elections "a farce to which representatives of the opposition were not allowed," literally repeating the statements of Mugabe and Nkomo. The fact that African political leaders in Rhodesia said that Joshua Nkomo and Robert Mugabe were invited to participate in elections with a guarantee of immunity and amnesty to the insurgents, but pointedly refused to participate, did not faze Jimmy Carter in the slightest. In addition, the result (63.9% of the 2.9 million people who had the right to vote is a result far greater than in most U.S. elections) was also ignored.
Naturally, a number of complaints was filed after the election, mostly from Sithole - but the same observers from the United States confirmed that the number of violations was minimal, and the election process itself was honest and conducted with all appropriate procedure. In fact, these were the only honest elections ever held on the African continent - at least for that period. Perhaps this was the reason that Mugabe and Nkomo refused to take part in them.

Washington ended up in a bit of a bind. There no longer was any clear reason for Carter to continue diplomatic and economic war against Rhodesia – after all, it was no longer ruled by the "White minority"; on the contrary, the government of the "black majority" was elected in the country, the principle of "one person - one vote" was observed, and even those few manifestations of racial discrimination that remained in the country have disappeared. Now nothing stopped the United States from officially recognizing Zimbabwe-Rhodesia as a full member of the international community. But Carter entertained no such ideas - the American president’s administration aimed not for "human rights and the triumph of democratic principles," as was officially declared, but for collapsing a capable state. To resolve the "Rhodesian problem", Jimmy Carter urgently met with Cyrus Vance, Andrew Young, Walter Mondale and Zbigniew Brzezinski. The result of the meeting was affirmation of the status quo: U.S. policy towards Rhodesia would remain the same until power was transferred to Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo, whatever the cost.

In his article "Africa Speaks" (Houston Chronicle of May 2, 1979), (((William Safire))) wrote:

Therefore, the Young-Moose catspaw in the House of Representatives, Democrat Stephen Solarz of Brooklyn, N.Y., who heads the Foreign Affairs subcommittee on Africa, led his group to a unanimous rejection of the Senate plan to monitor the honesty of the Rhodesian elections. Solarz gave as his reason for opposing a U.S. delegation to inspect the election, his contention that "it would be interpreted as an endorsement" of the election. His argument carried, and the Senate could not go without the House.
But even Solarz must have a hard time bunking away the facts: under active threat of guerrilla attack, 64 percent of the eligible voters went to the polls, most for their first time, to choose a black-majority government that preserves the rights of the white minority. It is a model for those "front-line" African states that talk about democracy but do not permit opposition.
That is no outlandish parallel. Though Representative Solarz dutifully evokes his Brooklyn District in support of Israel, his all‐out, topplethe‐regime advocacy of the Young-Moose African ideology is turning attitudes against Israel among some conservatives in Congress.

On May 7, 1979, the new parliament convened for its first meeting. For the first time there were more black deputies in it than Whites. The meeting was attended by Rhodesian Front and OANS (Muzorewa's party) in full, but 12 members of Ndabaningi Sithole’s party did not appear to attend the session’s opening, saying that they thereby express their protest against the election results. Ian Smith transferred his powers to the new prime minister, bishop Abel Muzorewa, and the latter was sworn in as head of state of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia (a name that was accepted as a compromise after much discussion).

In comparison to Smith, Muzorewa was a weak and ineffective politician. He could not muster the same degree of resistance to external pressure exerted on the country by foreign governments and terrorists supported by the USSR and China. South Africa took a dual position: on one hand, they continued to support Muzorewa, because as a prime minister he suited them much better than Mugabe or Nkomo. On the other hand, Pretoria understood perfectly well that the days of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia were numbered considered and ascent of one of the terrorist leaders to power was just a matter of time. Therefore, it was not worth it to spend too much effort and resources on supporting Muzorewa. As for ZIPRA and ZANLA, the intensity of terrorist attacks only increased. To Muzorewa’s credit, however, it should be noted that in the matters of repelling the terrorist threat he was almost as determined as Smith and did not hesitate to use force where necessary. But in everything else, he lost to Smith badly. If fighter pilot Ian Smith was forged from steel, Bishop Muzorewa was baked from dough. It only took Washington and London a few weeks to understand this and subsequently increase pressure on the new prime minister.
It must be noted again that after the elections in Rhodesia, the U.S. Senate demonstrated common sense and adopted a resolution naming the elections free and fair, internal contradictions resolved, and urging the president to immediately cancel the sanctions. This initiative by Jesse Helms was regarded by the Carter Administration as a serious blow, and countermeasures followed soon after. No sooner had Rhodesia and South Africa welcomed the initiative of the U.S. Senate, as Andrew Young published an article with a rather unambiguous warning – apparently, the lifting of sanctions against Rhodesia would guarantee the armed conflict’s expansion. Rhodesian counterpropaganda, however, worked at full capacity to dispel this myth, and to achieve his goal, Carter was ready to take any measures, including recognizing the leaders of terrorist groups as "political leaders". Carter could not openly invite Mugabe or Nkomo to the U.S., let alone the White House – a self-proclaimed champion of human rights publicly welcoming someone who does not give a damn about them would be too much. But what can’t be done openly, can be done covertly. In May 1979, Joshua Nkomo arrived in the United States. Answering journalists' questions, spokesman of the U.S. State Department said that Mr. Nkomo had arrived in the United States on a private visit. Also, according to him, Nkomo would give a private lecture at Moorhouse College in Georgia. The spokesman, however, declined to answer the question whether Nkomo's choice of destination – Georgia, the political playground of both Carter and Young - was coincidental.

Needless to say, Nkomo's entry visa, unlike Smith’s, was issued without slightest delay. During his tour of the United States, Nkomo also visited Texas, where he was an honored guest at a conference organized by the African-American Institute. His speech was attended by about 100 statesmen and business representatives from the U.S. and several African countries. The honor of giving the floor to the terrorist fell to the mixed-race Democratic congressman from the State of Texas, George "Mickey" Leland, a zealous supporter of the president on African issues. Declaring the recent elections in Rhodesia illegitimate, Mickey Leland introduced Nkomo to the audience as "President of Zimbabwe" (which Nkomo did not object to), although he never received a single vote in any election.

Nkomo's speech amounted to approval of the U.S. government’s decision not to abolish sanctions against Rhodesia and urging to continue the war against Muzorewa’s government, no matter the cost. The lifting of sanctions, according to Nkomo, woul lead America to greater shame than the Vietnam War. Further on, the "President of Zimbabwe" explained to the audience his opinion on what to regard as terrorism:
One would be hard pressed to cook up a more cynical lie. "Legitimate military objectives," against which ZIPRA guerrillas conducted actions, in reality were civilian: civil flight passengers, pregnant women, children, disabled people, nuns and missionaries. Nevertheless, his words were perceived as pure truth.

On May 28 1979, following this debacle, AP journalist James Kilpatrick published a column in Houston Chronicle, titled “What kind of elections does Nkomo want?”. The answer was within the column itself:

In case the US administration, for whatever reason, left Nkomo's words without attention, the leaders of a number of African countries immediately expressed their opinions as well. Julius, Nyerere, the president of Tanzania - the state that had the most terrorist training camps per square kilometer in all subequatorial Africa - issued a stern warning to the United States and Great Britain against lifting sanctions or trying to recognize Muzorewa’s government. Almost simultaneously, the Organization of African Unity stated that it did not intend to recognize Abel Muzorewa as the legitimate head of the government, and strongly warned the United States and Britain against helping the first black prime minister of the country in any way.

After Abel Muzorewa was sworn in, he began to form a new government. The parliament quickly elected the country’s new president - Reverend Josiah Zion Gumede, a respected public and political figure. The cabinet had five Whites (from the Rhodesian Front party) as ministers of justice, finance, traffic, transport and energy and communications (Ian Smith joined the government as a minister without a portfolio). The rest of the ministers were black, as most of the posts went to Muzorewa’s UANC party, with a minor part going to the Federative Party. Muzorewa himself occupied, in addition to the post of the prime minister, the posts of the Minister of Defense and the Minister of Joint Operations. Reverend Sithole and his colleagues were also invited to take up posts, but they refused, still denouncing the elections as rigged. Later, Muzorewa was forced to order the arrest of several members of the ANCS party for plotting a coup (again).

President Carter was not happy with the racially integrated government of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia at all. In June 1979, he said that presence of Mugabe and Nkomo in the new government would be the necessary condition for the lifting of sanctions. In fact, Carter openly admitted that he never pursued charitable goals such as "majority rule", "one person - one vote", "human rights", "democratic values", etc. – what he wanted was his own solution to the "Rhodesian problem" and to hell with the rest. Senator Helms, trying to do at least something, ventured to invite Bishop Muzorewa to the United States. Strangely enough, this time the State Department did not resist: the new prime minister received a visa without delay and safely arrived in America.

In addition to being a legally elected prime minister, Muzorewa was also a priest. (An interesting fact is that he studied theology not only at the Umtali Bible College, but also in the USA: he received his master's degree in Scarritt College in Nashville, Tennessee, and his master's degree in philosophy at the Central Methodist College in Fayette, Missouri). He became the Bishop of Rhodesia in 1968. One could reasonably expect American religious leaders – or at least the Methodists, to whom Muzorewa belonged - to welcome their colleague. However, nothing could be further from the truth: the welcome Muzorewa received from these people was chilly at best. Interestingly enough, when Muzorewa opposed Ian Smith, American churches were tumbling over each other in attempts to glorify him, even nicknaming him "African Moses". The moment he started cooperating with Smith, clerics branded him an outcast, a rogue and a dangerous rebel whose name should not be mentioned after sunset. After becoming Prime Minister, Muzorewa graduated to puppet of the devil himself in the eyes of the American clergy.

The World Council of Churches, a rather vile and sinister organization that provided all possible support to almost all of the world’s terrorist organizations, publicly urged not to recognize the government of Muzorewa. The reason was quite simple: the WCC was fully dedicated to supporting the Patriotic Front - the alliance of Mugabe and Nkomo - not at all embarrassed by the fact of courting notorious terrorists. Within the framework of the "Programme to Combat Racism", a grant of $85 000 was allocated to the fighters of the Patriotic Front. This money did indeed go towards combat, although probably not in the way the clergymen imagined: murder of civilians and personal enrichment of the group leaders. Naturally, such a "pious" organization could not support bishop Muzorewa, who only used force as a last resort.

Muzorewa was welcomed in the White House, but the end result remained the same. Jimmy Carter patiently listened to the bishop, only to then firmly state that the sanctions would only be lifted after the “reforms”, aka the plan cooked up by the United States and Great Britain. Abel Muzorewa now faced firsthand what Ian Smith had to contend with for the entire previous decade. But where Smith had steel, Muzorewa had gruel. Unable to withstand the pressure, the bishop surrendered and made it clear that he was ready to accept Anglo-American initiatives.
A small digression. In the spring of 1979, elections were held in Great Britain, won by conservatives led by Margaret Thatcher. During the election campaign, Thatcher repeatedly stated that in her opinion, the elections in Rhodesia were free and fair and that she intended to recognize the government of Muzorewa and lift the sanctions. And even before the Rhodesian elections, Thatcher was inclined to decide the issue in favor of recognizing the new government: "If the elections in Rhodesia are truly free and fair, as far as it is possible for the country under a constant terrorist threat, then Britain must agree with the choice of the Rhodesian population," she said once. However, one of her first steps was appointment of Lord Peter Carrington to the posts of Foreign Secretary and Minister for Overseas Development. Carrington’s position towards Zimbabwe-Rhodesia, by his own admission, was not that different from the position of his predecessor, David Owen. It is curious that at first Carrington recognized the possibility of international recognition of Rhodesia:

Thatcher's victory in the elections provided an opportunity for the new government to recognize Zimbabwe-Rhodesia and keep the promises given to the Rhodesians and the British. Had the UK recognized the elections, the U.S. would be in a very difficult situation, and it was highly possible that they would eventually follow the limeys’ example. And according to the Central Intelligence Organization of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia and NIS (National Intelligence Service) of South Africa, France, West Germany and other European countries in that case would almost immediately follow suit.

New York Times News Service on May 6, 1979:

Negotiations did take place, indeed - following the meeting between Lord Carrington and Cyrus Vance, the Margaret Thatcher government announced that it does not intend to recognize Abel Muzorewa's government or lift sanctions at the moment, but works in every possible way to ensure that the "Rhodesian problem" is solved in the very near future. True, the Carter administration still had doubts as to whether the British would toe this line. At the end of June 1979, Margaret Thatcher visited the World Economic Forum in Japan. On the way back, she made a stop in Australia - among the statements she made there was a commentary on the situation in Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. According to the Prime Minister, great progress has been achieved in the settlement process, and she does not see any valid reasons for the continuation of the conflict. However, at the same time she added that the official recognition of the country can take some time. Margaret Thatcher's statement sounded in sharp contrast to the words of Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser - he stressed that the Australian government fully shares the position of the states neighboring Zimbabwe-Rhodesia and does not intend to make any agreements with the government of Muzorewa. Upon Thatcher's return to London, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs recommended that she refrain from recognizing the Muzorewa government, because this will not lead to an end of the armed conflict, and the risk of the situation deteriorating will increase manifold. Yet Thatcher hesitated, which made the U.S. doubt that Britain would not recognize the new government.
These doubts quickly dissipated. In the summer of 1979, the government of Nigeria nationalized British oil companies in the country: the products of British Petroleum and the enterprises that sold it went to the state, and that’s not counting the blocking of oil contracts totaling 500 million pounds sterling. In addition, Nigeria made it clear that it is ready to block all oil exports to the UK on a moment’s notice. As General Olusegun Obasanjo, the Nigerian leader, explained: "We must make Britain look at the situation of Zimbabwe differently. No black African can feel free as long as the south of Africa is not free.”
The nationalization of assets occurred shortly before the conference of the British Commonwealth in Zambia. Margaret Thatcher, who attended the conference, announced that her government "will seek to establish the rule of the real black majority" - and the emphasis was on the word "real". It must be assumed that Joshua Nkomo was very happy to hear these words, given that he was seated within 3 meters of Thatcher. At a press conference given on the next day, Nkomo, radiant with pride, contentedly stated: "Yesterday, Mrs. Thatcher clearly learned something – if, of course, she was serious about the rule of the real black majority." (Associated Press of August 2, 1979).

In a joint statement, the leaders of 39 states once again stressed that they are in favor of "introducing the rule of the real black majority in Zimbabwe" and described the Salisbury Agreements as unconstitutional. The statement of the leaders of the Commonwealth countries also called for the convening of a constitutional conference under the patronage of Great Britain, in which all parties, including the "insurgents", would take part. In this statement, the country was exclusively called "Zimbabwe" and not "Zimbabwe-Rhodesia". This once again stressed that the fate of the country has already been resolved and Rhodesians won’t even get to choose the name. Upon learning of this decision, Abel Muzorev bitterly exclaimed: "I do not understand - is Mrs. Thatcher is a real conservative or a carefully disguised Labourist?"

In early September, the sixth "Conference of the countries participating in the Non-Aligned Movement at the highest level" was held in Havana. In addition to the leaders of African states, it was attended by Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo. The leaders of ZANU and ZAPU actively urged the heads of state of Africa not to support the Lusaka agreements. The reason was simple: both Mugabe and Nkomo wished to continue the armed struggle to the victorious end and overthrow the government by means of warfare. However, they did not take into account that Rhodesia’s neighbors were tired of the war. Leaders of Tanzania, Zambia and Mozambique (Nyerere, Kaunda and Machel, respectively) held a closed meeting with Mugabe and Nkomo, where they demanded, as an ultimatum, that the latter renounce the idea of continuing the war. Kaunda told Nkomo that he was fed up with the war and constant raids of Rhodesians into Zambia. If Nkomo refuses to come to the conference in London, then Zambia will simply stop supporting the ZIPRA militants, close all of Nkomo’s camps in the country, and kick out his goons. Samora Machel told the same thing to Mugabe: his absence in London will automatically mean the cessation of all assistance to ZANLA.

At the conference in London (later dubbed the Lancaster Conference), which opened in autumn of 1979, Britain first demanded from Abel Muzorewa to recognize all of his actions as illegal, starting from the moment of the general election. Then a new constitutional plan was announced. In short, the plan effectively deprived the White population of all guarantees, even on paper. In addition, as already mentioned, the name "Rhodesia" would be struck from the face of the earth. Ian Smith, who was also present at the conference, fiercely resisted, but he did not possess any formal powers, as the prime minister’s title was still held by Muzorewa (temporarily recognized by Great Britain for the time of negotiations). American observers, sent at the insistence of Senator Helms (an action that caused a diplomatic hysteria in London), also could not do anything, as they did not have the right to vote. As a result, the parties reached a compromise – Whites were guaranteed a certain number of seats in the parliament, but not enough to be able to block future changes in the constitution.

On September 25, 1979 Abel Muzorewa addressed the nation – or, to be precise, the White population of Rhodesia, because the constitutional changes concerned them first and foremost. In his speech, he asked the White population to remain in league with the blacks, even though the former had been deprived of the constitutional right to veto. According to the prime minister, "Some may think this is the darkest day in history, but the darkness is thickest before dawn."
From the point of view of an ordinary person, this is called deception. From the point of view of a statesman, this is politics. When the White population of Rhodesia voted for adoption of the Salisbury Agreements (which gave the Prime Minister’s post to Muzorewa in the first place), they agreed to accept the rule of the black majority only on the condition that Whites would have the right and the opportunity to block any parliament constitutional reforms that could lead to deterioration of the situation in the country. Now, the White community watched in amazement as the Prime Minister, who was still wet behind the ears, calmly agreed to deprive the Whites of constitutional protection. Having agreed to such a step, Muzorewa, in fact, lost the moral right to be the highest official of the country.

The population of Rhodesia followed the course of the Lancaster Conference with unwavering attention. But the further it went, the clearer it became that this farce was unlikely to lead to anything good. From the point of view of the average Rhodesian, Thatcher and Carrington were trying to get this problem off their hands as soon as possible. Like businessmen caught red-handed with unseemly deeds, they tried to cut their losses and save face – all while betrayal on their part was more than obvious. A small country relying on Great Britain was simply tossed into water, like a child who does not know how to swim - and the audience watched with interest: will it sink or swim? But the international community insisted that it sink or swim only together with Mugabe and Nkomo.
Some of the Rhodesians were ready to agree that the original annexation of the territory on which Rhodesia was later created was not very fair and the development was based on exploitation of the natives, among other things. But colonization of any territory imposes certain obligations on the colonizing power. In this sense, Britain has always set an example of fair play. But in the second half of the twentieth century, the United Kingdom began to give up its responsibility in relation to the African territories under its mandate. The Rhodesians had before their eyes a clear example: the territory lying north of the Zambezi, the former Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia. After 1964, this formerly developed colony began to turn into a dysfunctional state, and rapidly so. And therefore, Rhodesians regarded Thatcher's position as a desire to turn their country into the same wretched parody of a state as was Zambia. The desire of Thatcher and Carrington to quickly get rid of the "Rhodesian problem" while formally keeping their hands clean was compared with another well-known example of washing one’s hands. Curses that Rhodesians were flinging at the British government would not fit even into the most detailed of dictionaries.

In turn, Mugabe and Nkomo kept putting forward additional conditions, threatening boycott, and sometimes demonstratively leaving the hall of negotiations (for example, at some point they said they did not agree with the paragraph of the basic law guaranteeing freedom of conscience and religious beliefs, as well as the paragraph that protected landowners from forcible seizure of their property), but in reality these were nothing more than cheap tricks. Terrorist leaders understood perfectly well that the main thing was to get their hands on official authority, and then they would use it as they saw fit; no constitution would be able to handicap them, as plenty of African examples have shown. Credit where credit is due, neither of the leaders was a naive fool – after all, they commanded large armies behind which superpowers secretly stood, and managed to hold on to their positions for a long time, despite endless intrigue and assassination attempts. Both Mugabe and Nkomo understood perfectly well that in any future elections, voters need to be FORCED to cast votes in their favor, at any cost. And first of all, in this situation it was necessary to get rid of control - i.e. make sure the “peace” is kept not by the army of Rhodesia, familiar with the terrorists methods, but by external forces, which know nothing of Africa in general and Rhodesia in particular.

The demand of Nkomo and Mugabe was firm - the state institutions of Rhodesia should not have any say in the matter of ensuring and holding elections. On this point, they stood balls-to-the-wall, and the United Kingdom was eventually forced to compromise: instead of Rhodesian Security Forces, a contingent of peacekeeping forces from the Commonwealth countries would be sent to the country to “keep peace” during the elections. The rest went according to a famous saying about an inch and a mile - the next demand was to recognize terrorist gangs as part of the peacekeeping forces. In fact, the terrorists ended up receiving more legitimacy than the armed forces of Rhodesia. Not to mention the fact that financial and other kinds of support of elections, including accommodation and food for the terrorists, would be assumed by London. As one of the officers of the Rhodesian Army bitterly said later, "even if Moscow tried to create their own constitutional plan for the transfer of power in Rhodesia, it still would not be able to surpass the efforts of London, no matter how hard it tried."

In November 1979, President Carter said he was ready to consider lifting sanctions against Rhodesia as soon as the country's election process began. Stephen Solarz immediately commented on the president's statement as "necessary and timely" - to which Jesse Helms remarked dryly that lifting sanctions at the time of Rhodesia turning into a communist country would only benefit the communists, but not the U.S.
Upon returning to Salisbury, Abel Muzorewa solemnly announced the victory he had achieved. In fact, counting chickens before they hatch is a rather risky, if not outright suicidal, thing for a politician to do, but Muzorewa was not fazed by that in the slightest. He was more than confident of his victory in the upcoming elections, especially since his witch doctor publicly performed several magical rites that guaranteed Muzorewa a landslide victory. All around the country, rallies and festivities were organized by candidates. The White community of Rhodesia gazed morosely at the wild dances of Negroes, who were beyond themselves with joy, and quietly wondered for which country to leave.

In mid-December of 1979, Botswana, Mozambique and Tanzania warned the government of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia and Thatcher's office that they would continue to support the Patriotic Front if the victory in the elections does not go to Mugabe or Nkomo. President of Zambia Kenneth Kaunda abstained from such statements, simply saying that his country was on the verge of an economic collapse. There were reasons for this - several daring raids of the Rhodesian SAS had pretty much annihilated the entire transportation infrastructure of Zambia, essentially bringing the country on its knees. So Kaunda decided it would be best not to interfere, realizing that Rhodesians possess sufficient audacity and skills to pay him a personal visit the next time he decides to act up.
On December 28, 1979, a truce was officially announced. Terrorist armies surged into Rhodesia unimpeded. Some of the terrorists actually joined the peacekeeping forces, trying to follow the instructions and maintain order. Most of them, however simply scattered across the country - according to the most conservative estimates, over 16 thousand armed terrorists entered Rhodesia at that time, although the exact number is difficult to name.
Contrary to the starry-eyed dreams of London and Washington, the bloodshed did not stop and mass murder of civilians continued, except now it was in the context of explaining the new electoral policy "vote or die". Moreover, the terrorists tried to turn their weapons against the peacekeeping forces too - they managed to shoot down a helicopter with three servicemen on board. London ignored the incident and did not take any measures against the militants.

During this period (starting with December 11, 1979), the country was under the leadership of Lord Soames - on December 12, he arrived as the governor of the territory and the country - until April 17, 1980 - became known as the "Colony of Southern Rhodesia". Despite non-stop violence committed by terrorist gangs, Governor Soames did nothing - except for the languid regrets expressed through the press:

In fact, Governor Soames has publicly admitted his inability to control the situation in the colony accountable to him - but neither Britain nor the USA was too worried about that. Nor did they worry about a war that slowly started smoldering between Nkomo and Mugabe – several attempts on the life of the latter were made in the pre-election period, but he miraculously survived. Washington hurried to announce in advance that the future elections would be "fair and just", doing its best not to mention the 1979 elections that had taken place in a peaceful and calm environment.

The results of the election were a shock for everyone except for the party of the victorious Robert Mugabe, who won by an overwhelming majority of votes. The "civilized world" sighed with relief - Rhodesia no longer existed, and what remained of it was led by a die-hard militant Marxist, whose coming to power was feared by all with at least a modicum of common sense. Margaret Thatcher expressed a hope that now the country will occupy a worthy place in the Commonwealth, Jimmy Carter posed for photographers with his charming smile, modestly recalling his contribution to the "establishment of democracy in Zimbabwe". Andrew Young, dumbfounded with joy, celebrated the victory, while Henry Kissinger, Lord Carrington and Cyrus Vance exchanged congratulatory telegrams.

Out of 100 seats in the parliament, 20 were reserved for Whites, and they were all won by Ian Smith's Rhodesian Front party. Out of 80 places for blacks, 20 went to ZAPU (Joshua Nkomo), 57 to ZANU (Robert Mugabe) and 3 to UANC (Abel Muzorewa). Britain granted its former "colony" independence and on April 18, 1980, a new state of Zimbabwe appeared on the world map.

Sensibly speaking, Britain could fully recognize the independence of Rhodesia in 1965, which would only benefit both countries. Great Britain’s example could have been followed by the United States. However, the leaders of these countries did not have the slightest desire to do so, despite having all the opportunity in the world. The United States and Britain could have helped resolve the "Rhodesian question" - without interfering in it - in 1971 and in 1976. From them, only one thing was required - to keep the previously given promises. Instead, Britain and the United States not only did not keep their word, but actively worked on destroying Rhodesia. As for the United States, placing the cherry on top of this "work" fell to the great peacemaker, Nobel Peace Prize laureate, human rights champion, the all-pervasive humanist supporter James Earl Carter, 39th President of the United States. A man who prides himself on always telling the truth.

And that's it. I fucked up the formatting in some spots, but I hope it's still readable. Pardon any mistakes I have made in the translation, English and Russian are not my native languages.

Also, here's the pastebin version:
pastebin.com/1pdkxPAJ

Bump

nice
haven't read yet, will tho, thx in advance

You're welcome.

from an old rhodie much thanks. farewell.

Post stories.

Thank you for doing a job for us. It's enjoyable and interesting posts to read user.

Can you post the stories from the old days?

Bump

Stories.
Stories Now.

Hey are you still here? We are waiting for your stories mate.

What happened to the few posts?

thanks for the interest. i was just too young to be conscripted but I grew up in an out of the rural areas so we were seriously affected by the war. a guerilla war sucks bigtime. you cant trust anyone. the guy who cooks your meal at lunch would go and listen to terrs lecturing him at night to kill all the whites. a family friend had exactly this on his farm - attack at night, chaos, a couple of RPGs into the protective walls around the outer windows, pets shot. he runs upstairs with his FN and sees his fucking COOK dancing around on the lawn encouraging the gooks. he thought fuck this, he runs back down to his safe and fetches the elephant gun which was this ancient old 4-bore he had inherited. The shot pretty much cut the guy in half and the other guys scattered.

so growing up during a war and not knowing anything other than a war is a very strange experience. every night the TV (black and white for many yrs) news would have reports, some of them starting with 'combined operations regrets to announce the death in action of' and then some poor bastards who got slotted. often you knew the names.

grade school essay writing would have topics like you are a patrol leader hunting down terrs in the zambezi valley, describe your last operation. we were 10-11 and here we were writing pre-adolescent shit about mowing down floppies. i read one years later and it was pure starship troopers stuff man. except it was real every day. some parts of the country were just suicide to visit, especially the border areas. but the bush was my friend, I grew up in it, worshipped it, lived in it, breathed it. weapons were always handy, i had a G3, twelve bore, pump action .410, FN, .22, .22 pistol and could handle them all by 14. sometimes there were accidents: a girl I knew at grade school got accidentally shot by her brother and killed. my dad beat the shit out of me and my sister the one time we treated guns disrespectfully - never again.

Amazing story Sir

also were you guys allowed to form a militia Like MERICA and unofficially REMOVE COMMIES during your free time?

farmers and rural communities were their own militias by default but mainly in self defence. we had this crappy radio system called agric alert so that we could help each other. taking out commies in your free time was encouraged but not practiced widely because of the possibility of running into your own side. like I mentioned guerilla wars suck. miles and miles and miles of bush patrolling with no guarantee of even seeing the enemy let along having a shot at him. the fuckers only shot unarmed white missionaries anyway they sucked as soldiers.

Though did you participate in a Militia and sorry if its too much to ask How many good people have you known lost?

not me. plenty of older friends and relatives though. Lost quite a few family friends and one close relative. all in ambushes, none in open combat. terrs were cowards at heart.