FCC Starts Process to Kill Net Neutrality

>archive.fo/TFpPw

Nothing listed here contridicts anything I've said, unless you're an idiot who buys completely into spin.

You're missing the point. Obama's brand of "Net Neutrality" was an internet owned and controlled and regulated by the government. Nobody here is going to say that ISP's should be able to throttle sites based on their content. You should by all means tell Pai not to let them do that.

because there is just no way the government could just do the same
you can always trust the government
archive.is/lyBBc

Oh no! Another Obama law is coming down. What will we do?

None of those sites listed have had anything done to them. Are you really that pathetic that you can't even show me a negative effect that actually happened? Net Neutrality protects sites like Holla Forums, Breitbart, Infowars more than anyone else.

It's regulating ISPs. Not "the internet". It's forcing them to treat all websites equally. Going "b-but muh Obama" isn't an argument, show me that Net Neutrality is actively fucking over websites.

Hogwash. All net neutrality does is keep your internet shitty permanently by making it unprofitable to upgrade the last mile. It takes the power and cost control and hands it to the content hosts. It would be like taking all power companies networks and handing control of them to the coal and natural gas industry, who could care less about the needs of the average customer or, god forbid, rural customers.

answer me this: was any non-kosher site throttled by ISPs before net neutrality?

Never let good crisis go to waste;)

what is the slippery slope?

You must be pretty dense

Calm down you hysterical fool. You're acting
like Holla Forums.

Heres a tldr article from 2015 archive.fo/JW1Ft

Essentially government was taking over the internet, and you know damn well that the government would have controlled content if they got away with it. Fortunately they didn't. Always remember, when a leftist says one thing, you can be sure they intend to do the opposite.

Likewise, you can't just say "b-but muh net neutrality." As was saying, it's not really net neutrality. It's being called that, sure, but the law implemented in the name of net neutrality is not the same as the concept of net neutrality itself.

Shoo shoo Yiddish shill!

Because it makes Trump and his based street shiter look bad

Yes, Comcast v FCC is all about how Comcast was throttling P2P sites and software, this case is ultimately what lead up to net neutrality rules being officially implemented.

because if there's one thing the government cares about deeply it's P2P sites

Ok Im getting super mixed signals here, are we for this shit or what?
And what do the jews hate more here?

Not shilling, just trying to educate you. Net neutrality has nothing to do with censorship. It is 100% about fucking over the telecoms in favor of Google/Netflix/Amazon/HollyJews. By shilling in favor of this crap you are supporting the kikes who are ACTUALLY doing the censoring and content control. Non-professionals should simply stop engaging on this topic, as it is beyond the comprehension of 80% of the population, which yes, includes you.

You got that right, at least the American and Japanese ones.

Oh they'll keep P2P sites running to keep the good goys distracted, they'll even use P2P sites as the standard for sites that must be protected while they down Holla Forums and other bad goy sites.

You’re fucking retarded. That’s what’s in power NOW. We’re REPEALING that.

Literally the exact opposite is happening.

>>>Holla Forums
>>>/oven/

Is that why trackers keep getting shy down.

I'm for net neutrality which means a free and open internet, not (((Net Neutrality))) which is Jewish controlled.

when the government gets their hands on something it never ends there
it would get subverted just like everything else

Then why sage

As always, the Jews have positioned a trap for us. On one side are the ISP's, on the other is the ZOG. The ZOG bill that's being repealed will reopen a vacuum that the ISP's might try to fill. There is a middle ground here, and it's what you can contact the FCC about. See

A fallacy unless there is a direct pattern shown. He needs to prove that the goverment has used NN to throttle right-wing sites. I don't give a fuck about if some antifa faggot wants the government to, because that's not the claim that was made.

Except nothing in that 2017 article says anything regarding regulating "the internet". In fact, it's proving me right even moreso. It solely has to deal with regulating ISPs (or BSPs as the article puts it)

Great, then show it. How is the net neutrality in effect not the same?

Really? Who is getting throttled currently? Who is getting more bandwidth because of net neutrality?

Again, you aren't seeing the bigger picture here. (((Net Neutrality))) was the first step towards Chinese style censorship that was rolled out on sites like Faceberg.

inb4 b-but that's completely different
same government

Time to invest in Comcast.

...

See, the slippery slope is real in regards to the gun control. However it does not exist in regards to NN because no sites have been throttled by the goverment and seem to be protected by the goverment instead, and there is no evidence to suggest that the Goverment has any plans to do so with this topic. The FCC has absolutely no relationship with any gun controlling group.

You mean the completely corporate censorship? Uncle Sam didn't force them to do that shit, they did it all on their own. If you remove Net Neutrality, then you're gonna see that style of censorship multiply.

...

In b4 NN gets removed and a few SJWs complain to Comcast about a site like this that hurts their feel-feels and causes them to block the site for PR.

What a shitshow of a thread. Fucking morons think because the kikes named something "neutrality" it's a good thing. Some of you are absolutely fucking dense. Instead of sperging out why don't you go read the details of what (((Net Neutrality))) actually entailed. Fucking mongs.

If you mean the Google/Netflix/Amazon cabal are the ones currently in power based on the Obama FCC ruling, then we agree. They were handed the power by the "net neutrality" ruling that Trump's FCC is trying to repeal, restoring some sense of fairness and corporate responsibility to the market. When your GigE fiber link becomes available at your house, it will be largely because this "neutrality" ruling was defeated.

Government is a corporation too and it has its own interests. Also

So we just keep making racist websites over and over again forever if we have to, the people aren't going to go away and complete decentralization isn't far away either. Hell that situation would only push the envelope.

The problem is that Google’s the only one even IMPROVING their infrastructure, but I refuse to let those kikes know every single website I visit. Never mind that I couldn’t afford their shit anyway.

Good to know.

See, this is a guy with a fucking brain.

Except decentralization is P2P, and ISPs have already gotten in trouble for throttling P2P networks.

This. Pay attention to this guy. Net neutrality has always been high kikery designed to obscure the anti-competitive activities of (((content owners))). It is one of the most brilliant pieces of realpolitik perpetrated in the past few decades, so respect the enemy for he is a crafty fuck. Convincing edgy script kiddie tier nerd to shill for (((them))) was nothing short of genius.

You mean the regulation affecting (((ISPs))) with companies like (((Comcast))) and (((Verizon))), protecting the content providers such as 8ch.

Of course, putting parentheses around nouns and claiming that all content providers are jews (rather than the jewish run ISPs) is a lot easier than actually providing some evidence for your claims.

Unless they straight up pull a north korea on us, there are always going to be ways to outwit the incompetent bureaucracies of the world to have a free flow of information online.

archive.is/X3cs9

There are always ways around it, but have you ever been in a country where they block sites and you end up having to use a VPN/proxy/TOR? When you have half the country using VPN's they tend to get slow, have connection issues and the whole experience is shit. The way it is in the US now is pretty good, don't take it for granted.

It's like they don't notice the irony.

nah, this is just typical commie lies. "freedom of speech" means "nobody is allowed to disagree with me"

Believe me, I'm not and its absolutely a fight worth fighting. Protecting the net is every bit as important as protecting free speech and gun rights. I'm just not going to get nihilistic over it because even in places like China the smart people get around all that bullshit anyway.

My speech is free, yours? Two shekels. L'CHAIM!

I think normies don't really give a shit. They'll accept literally anything after the 4th or 5th time their asked. A that point they just don't want to be bothered.

Weak Wiemarian wastes.

Is that so? I was under the impression that there wasn't net neutrality laws either way. right?

I think the new net neutrality laws give the government the ability to regulate ISPs the same way they regulate phone and cable lines.

Either way, if John Oliver is for Net Neutrality, that makes me suspicious. Still, I don't want pic related to become a reality nor do I want ISPs given the ability to censor shit.

This is all you need to know. The shit is rightly dead in the water.

I've never seen the point in being a contrarian unless I actually have a reason to disagree. I agree with net neutrality, I don't think the government is the best organization to handle such a thing though. When the dems talk about NN, they aren't talking about making a free and open web, they're talking about controlling the whole thing.

the way I see it though, if the ISPs haven't been suicidal enough to charge for individual site use, why would they shoot themselves now? It's pretty hard to put do the throttling crap after you've given everyone unlimited access, especially at a time when everyone is suspicious of the government.

I know, and I hate the fact that he jumped on the bandwagon for it, but the whole situation is something that doesn't need to be dismissed because he agrees with it.
ISPs are a service, and that's what it should be. We don't need them to have packages, and get into the same crap that satellite and cable TV get into with their contract disputes which only hurt the consumer. It has nothing to do with the ability for them to make the connections faster.

I would agree, but cell phone companies had no problem doing that when they switched from unlimited to throttled ~2010

the only companies that do phone throttling are prepaid companies, all the contract phone providers give unlimited access since it's just bad business to do it. Besides, phone companies only throttle your overall internet speed, not an app by app basis.

the prepaids throttle because their networks are simply too small to do unlimited access. It's hard for a network that targets rural areas to compete.

ALWAYS. DO. OPPOSITE. OF. WHAT. JEWS. SAY.

The prepaid networks use the same network as the three major networks, but my point is around that time, they began phasing out unlimited data plans, which stopped people from watching videos, and streaming music from their phones when not on Wi-Fi. Because they all got rid of unlimited around the same time, there weren't too many options to switch to. I really think ISPs could get away with something similar.

Net Neutrality has only been in place since 2015. Where were all the ISPs throttling internet access before then? They weren't there, but suddenly I'm supposed to believe that this law will be repealed and they'll bend consumers over a barrel when they could have done so anytime prior to 2015?

Honestly that may be a good thing. I dont know about you lads but if I cant talk here its not going to make me stop talking its just gonna make me less reluctant to talk without anonymity. Im too far down the rabbit hole for such a tactic to silence me.

wiki.vuze.com/w/Bad_ISPs#United_States_of_America
This list started a long time before NN started, and shows all the ones that throttled P2P traffic specifically.

Did any of this change after net neutrality was passed?

Shhhh.
LISTEN AND BELIEVE GOYIM

OP (who is clearly not from here) makes this thread every few weeks, and every time people point all the reasons why this is meaningless.
I don't feel like doing this again. Take your disingenuous sky-is-fallling sperging back to leftypol.

8ch isn't based in the US.

I have one of the providers on the list and as of after NN, there appears to be no blocking.

I know of at least two lawsuits for it. Chin Vs. RCN (which resulted in a payout and the stopping of throttling)
and the comcast class action (which resulted in payout and the stopping of throttling)

Dumbass.

Oh dude, you should ask for an updated version of your playbook, since it's plain fucking obvious that you don't even know how the internet work,s let alone what all those confusing words that you keep on throwing around actually mean.

Nah, I'm going to call you the shill, given those guidelines.

No major telecom provider has ever been proven to filter or throttle based on content. They are not smart enough to do it without fucking it up even if they wanted to. Cable operators have done it because they operate as FCC protected monopolies and have no competitors to eviscerate them. Verizon/AT&T etc have no interest in content filtering and do not have monopoly power anywhere in the US.

Content owners Like Jewgle, Kikebook, Goyflix etc filter based on content and traffic type every day and have managed to get morons to shill for them as though they are Free Speech inc.

It would be funny if it were not fucking over so many customers.

Go back to reddit

Most of Holla Forums can only think from a conservative perspective (muh company freedoms), rather than a right to internet privacy, or thinking of the internet as a public utility. Trump would glady sell both.

Honestly not sure of a solution. Any ideas? There was also a crackdown on YouTube, so there is a clear war going on lately.

...

What are you talking about user? Most people here fucking hate corporations.

Kill yourself newfag
techcrunch.com/2009/07/26/att-blocks-4chan-this-is-going-to-get-ugly/

I remember AT&T and Charter blocking 4chan multiple times

Jews say to drink water daily. Good luck.

Dude, lots of Holla Forums buys into the BS info companies put out to sell us on shit. People are fooled into thinking it's for "freedom", when they want to fuck us over.

Anti-gunners are the closest to an actual trigger for me because it reminds me of how unbearable NJ's gun laws are.

Yeah fellow /poll/ock, we should do what slimey limey tells the timey and king nigger want instead.

see

>techcrunch.com/2009/07/26/att-blocks-4chan-this-is-going-to-get-ugly/

Freudian slip much kike?

What are the names of the two Republicans who voted yes, in the 2-1 vote to end it?

Do we complain to them or something? I still don't understand what were supposed to do.

...

OP should be banned just for this

NN was always a made up issue that served as a trojan horse for federal control over the internet.

Nice argument, nigger.

attpublicpolicy.com/fcc/net-neutrality-and-modern-memory/

...

ISPs do not want to get into the content regulating business. That costs money and potentially exposes them to liability if something slips through (if you say you're filtering adult content and someone's kid manages to find a way to get to porn nonetheless, you could end up getting sued). Eliminating net neutrality might lead to services like Netflix that use lots of bandwidth having to pay ISPs to not be throttled. It might lead to ISPs like Comcast that are associated with media companies throttling their competitors' services or giving their own preferential treatment. It would not lead to crimethink sites being throttled, because no one at an ISP wants to pay people to build that list and keep it up to date. It probably wouldn't even affect torrenting, given how much that's declined in favor of streaming among normalfags.

Too bad. Der 8. Kanal out of reach from Germany when?

This is bad. This is worse than a ban, because the virulent "muh works for me" in the tech community will kill sites who can't pay.

Not in Europe. Not in Africa. Not in Asia. Not everywhere else than Murrica. And when Kikebook takes the filter in their hands, you can always say to the judge "but muh best engineers did everything they could" and nothing happens. State of the art means no shekels for claiming party.

Kikebook is not an ISP. Net neutrality means absolutely nothing to them.

666 dimensional chess everyone, and if you disagree you're shareblue and should kys.

This kike gets it. Why should ISPs be regulated when facebook and google aren't? Net nuetrality is fucking stupid.

Because you can start an alternative website extremely easy, but you cannot start an alternate ISP. How retarded do you have to be to not understand this simple concept?

...

You can't start a new ISP? How fucking stupid of a cum guzzling shit felcher do you have to be to believe this? We need a better class of shills.

Wow, it's almost like America actually fucking enforces its laws and standards, instead of being lazy niggers for anything that isn't "hate speech" related.

The same kikes that run the ISPs run the government. If they wanted the internet shut down, it would be. They're not going to risk angering the docile goyim

Without it what's to stop ISPs from divvying the Internet into packages like cable channels?

Want a video package of Hulu, Netflix, Amazon, YouTube? it's gonna cost extra.

Want a news package of CNN, MSNBC and CNBC?
that's also extra.

Can anyone explain the benefits of getting rid of net neutrality?

inb4 competition. ISPs deliberately do not compete to keep prices high.

The claims that bandwidth costs ISPs money is a crock of shit.

it costs next to nothing. it's simply passing on a copy of data along.

They want to charge video services out of greed.

Does it cost you a fortune to transfer a file on your home network to another computer on your own network?

fuck no.

If you ever needed proof of this board being shill co-opted here it is

Odd isn’t it. I really do hope they are shills. There are zero potential ways that this legislation could be used positively and endless ways it could (and given the track record of the players involved will) be implemented to the detriment of all Internet users.

It is like handing a serial killer an axe because he has said he won’t kill anyone.

It is like handing a serial killer an axe because he has said he won’t kill anyone inspite of the fact the Goverment has just granted him total immunity if he does so*

Good. "Net neutrality" is a scam supported by joogle and George Soros. It gives further control of the internet to the FCC, i.e. ZOG. These leftists support it because they know it will allow them to institute censorship in the future more easily.

...

You HAVE to be a shill. These has nothing at all to do with the Governments direct control over the Internet, they are no less or more able to directly censor sites with or without it. They and cooperate interests will however be able to covertly censor the Internet with a layer of deniability if it becomes legislation.

Idiot.

This*

I don't trust either one, but the fact is that ISPs have already been proven to restrict content, ideally the act would be revised and net neutrality would be handled by an independent 3rd party unrelated to either ISPs or the federal gov composed of technocrats

I think it's mostly just people knee-jerking over a complex issue; shills are usually way more intense and argumentative.

It's no wonder you're retarded.

Why would you believe that? Shills are paid to promote net neutrality. It is supported by all the most powerful people and organizations in the world, and they pumps tons of money into shilling for it. Soros, joogle, Zuckerberg, microshit all support title II net neutrality. You think this is because they care about "open internet" when every one of these is currently attempting to censor the internet right now? No, it's because they know it allows even easier censorship. Title II is part of the reason TV and radio are pure shit.

False.

Let the free market decide shit; fuck net neutrality

kslegislature.org/li_2014/b2013_14/measures/documents/sb304_00_0000.pdf
there are plenty of other examples as well

another link
cjonline.com/legislature-state/2014-02-05/wire-cut-senate-bill-banning-municipal-broadband-networks

There is no real free market for ISPs when the major companies sue and try to halt any startup or municipal ISPs in order to block competition

It never ends. Stop it ALL now before it's to late…

independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/theresa-may-internet-conservatives-government-a7744176.html?amp

It worked well for George Dubya Bush with his "Patriot Act", low-IQ drones would never oppose something that suggests its patriotic.
While all it did was impair free movement of Americans making it more difficult to obtain simple things like mobile phones etc while the terrorists were getting the same financial backing, cover and unrestricted movement throughout the world.

People are dumb, just think Holla Forums helped MeMe this current Administration into power and get to call it a victory for our side, while jews call all the shots.

I've used the internet since like 1998. As I remember, the internet was just fine without the feds enforcing net neutrality. I'm not concerned with this issue. Give me compelling evidence as to why I should care. I don't give two fucks about ISPs throttling Kazaa or Limewire or Frostwire or whatever P2P service they supposedly went after. I used those programs during their existence, and never noticed.

...

One of these doesn't belong. You faggots have ruined this website so fucking quickly. If you really think this place is in the same category or fighting the same fight as fucking infowars you're either a shill or youre a 16 year old Mexican with a 70 iq. Please to all the cuckchan and Reddit refugees please go back where you came from. You don't realize what you're destroying. You have no business here. I haven't seen a single intelligent thread or one decent piece of oc since you fucking faggots all showed up here. Honestly fuck you. Drag your cum filled asses back to cuckchan and spend your time discussing the new Paul Joseph Watson video. Not to mention you don't understand net neutrality at all. It was created to stifle free market competition. Make no mistake you are our useful idiots. Stop making the mistake of thinking you can just step into a mans world and you'll automatically become one of us. The chain of command is broken. This was the final straw. This place is dead. One day you'll realize what youve done.

You had a point right until this
see

The major ISPs were already preventing competition before net neutrality, it actually has little effect on new ISPs

also see

archive.fo/sxXql

>archive.fo/sxXql
From your own article
But the story changes when ISPs have enough leverage.
Nothing in this disproves anything i have said.

This article blames both cities and major ISPs, even citing the case i mentioned earlier as a reference, this further proves my point that there is no free market when major ISPs in conjunction with local governments prevent startups

Except that it also makes a good case for that bill you didn't like.

Point out to what part of my comments you are referencing

Not arguing for or against the current net neutrality bill, but my point is that neither the cable companies or FCC should be trusted and while the current bill isn't ideal there should be a independent committee to either make a new bill or oversee ISPs.

If these cunts are for this, you know it's bad for us.

LMAO as if an ISP would take the effort beyond their default DNS server crap.

Reconfigure your DNS to OpenNIC servers, get DNSCrypt and Unbound, get VPNs as backups, switch to nonprofit ISPs, laugh at people who vote for corporate ISPs to buttfuck them and finger the politicians who enable such behavior. There are loads of options.

Not a choice, where i live there are only 2 ISPs, AT&T or Comcast
Both have data caps and a history of censorship

4gcommunity.org/
calyxinstitute.org/

Cripes it's like you fuckers don't do research or something.

here

>kslegislature.org/li_2014/b2013_14/measures/documents/sb304_00_0000.pdf
The purpose of the bill is not, as you imply, an attempt by ISPs to block competition. As my article made a case for, it would be to prevent local governments from keeping new entrants out of the market.

>calyxinstitute.org/
So its using Spring internet and its DNS systems but it costs more to buy an access point/hotspot than actual service from Sprint or Internet through another ISP

Your article explicitly gave examples of both, nor does it change the fact that there still isn't going to be any new ISPs if either the city or major ISPs are trying to block competition, removing net neutrality isn't going to change this either

I mean, if you're gonna kvetch, you might as well not look at 4G's plans which cost at least 50% less, not to mention you don't have to have some crappy package and are free of traffic management. Also, the plan's cost goes down after the first year, not up.

For that matter i can already use my phone as a 4G hotspot and do the same thing without having to pay $500 and still get unlimited data by changing the APN/proxy whenever it hits a cap
What i want is an actual landline/fiber ISP with better speeds than 4G to compete with fucking shitty Comcast/ATT and unfortunately there is none, i don't see how removing net neutrality is going to help this and there is no real free market when both the City and major ISPs want to prevent competition

Really Comcast needs to be considered a monopoly and forcibly broken apart like Bell labs/AT&T was at one point
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

Then I don't think you read it right.
And your earlier posts only gave examples of one… or unsubstantiated claims of one based on your misunderstanding of interactions between governments and businesses.

You haven't shown that.

Yeah. We diverged from OP's topic a bit. Welcome to imageboards.

techdirt.com/articles/20170509/05290137322/comcast-charter-join-forces-wireless-agree-not-to-compete.shtml
Here is an example of Comcast and Charter agreeing not to compete or cross each others designated service areas

recode.net/2015/4/23/11561844/blocking-comcast-is-a-start-but-if-we-want-better-broadband-we-need
Comcast is arguing that by buying up ISPs that were a single provider in areas it didn't previously control, likely due to agreements like the one above, is not trying to block competition

Fuck off faggot.

Wrong. Listen here, you stupid fucking reddit/ Holla Forums nigger. The "net neutrality" passed under Obongo is NOT the net neutrality you faggots masturbated over and campaigned for. Obongo played the name game, and named the bill that gave the GOVERNMENT control of the internet the same name as the proposed bill that would illegalize jewish handling of internet traffic. Wake the fuck up and realize what reality is. Reddit and the words of obese pedophile jew (((Richard Stallman))) and his followers are nothing but lies.

An agreement between Comcast and Charter isn't great but it can't really prevent anyone else from competing. Local governments have taken care of much threat of competition anyway.

Even your second article states that Comcast's argument is correct. And, again, the lack of competition is, as always, due to government interference.

He's not ALWAYS wrong.

I loved that game, but yours has far better graphics than I recall the bbs having

Why is the EFF giving mixed signals over this thing? They're one of the ones who was big on spreading awareness for a lot of (((government overreach initiatives))) and now they're only sort of bothered by this.

Try to comprehend stripping NN gives customers zero benefits in an already corrupted ISP monopoly. there is no "free internet" or (((free market))) solution that will come of this. Notice the only arguments for removing it are >CORPORATIONS ARE YOUR FRIENDS GOY :^), ITS AN EBIL OBAMA LAW TO CENSOR US! NEVERMIND WE'VE BEEN FEARMONGERING THIS FOR YEARS!

Ponder this, I want you shills to pay attention. If net neutrality is bad why didn't the government overstep their authority during the election to censor our redpilling and wikileaks? could it be because they don't actually have that authority through NN and served its purpose to protect smaller sites and treat traffic equally? now imagine at the beginning of the election net neutrality didn't exist. ISPs would have complete authority to throttle 4chan, Holla Forums, throttle-cap our speeds unless paid a ((((reasonable price)))), alternative media would be censored and wikileaks blocked from access leaving the majority of political opinion to be shifted back to legacy media like it was pre social media era. Clinton would win in a landslide, it would've been 2008 all over again.

Facebook, twitter, google, the mainstream legacy TV media etc ALL censored pro-trump content… and for whatever reason some of you are gullible enough to trust comcast? lol. inb4 20 replies of cuck/kike/>>>LP, sorry shills but your charade is exposed.

fcc.gov/general/open-internet

Could it be unrelated? The main battlegrounds were faceberg and twatter that weren't controlled by NN. Go home reddit, you're drunk.

Google doesn't support us now. They don't index this site.

Go to inn, flirt with Violet. That woman is such a whore.

Because freedom is for Jews fucking kike

I'm really not worried about the jew breaking the current internet. I know how to build internets. Stupid jew just left the plans sitting right there desu senpai. Gimme just one fucking reason….

Free market competition for government subsidized infrastructure given to monopolies? U wot?

And another redditfaggot. Obongo's jewtrality is NOT the original net neutrality. Period. Nothing was wrong before it existed, nothing will be wrong after repealing it. You faggots treat this exactly the same as leftists treat obongocare.

what the fuck does that even mean

Shitposting isn't a good method to backpedaling.

ahahahah this delusion.

NN is nothing like Obamacare, literally all it does it force ISPs ( corporations ) not to fuck us over. Obamacare was forcing CITIZENS ( real people, and no corporations aren't people Romney ) to purchase useless health insurance at insane rates to subsidize niggers.

Stop spouting off about a topic you know nothing about.

btw, trumpcare is the same exact thing as Obamacare without the benefits yet you trump partisans have been defending it for weeks just like you suddenly support scrapping NN because he hired a corrupt pajeet. Holla Forums was never anti-NN until now, fuckoff cunt.

Get out

is that public if so what's the ssh password

No hyperlink, it's fine. Kill yourself.