Huge redpill on race. A 2012 study forwarded the idea that skin tone was genetically linked to sexual activity and violence. Apparently it's widely observed that darker skin or hair pigmentation is linked directly with mutations which increase sexual activity and violence in animals. As we all know the same phenomenon is observed in humans. Even in sibling studies darker skin tone correlates strongly with sexual activity and violent behavior.
In breeding studies where animals were selectly primarily for docility, very frequently the animals would start demonstrating changes in skin or hair. The most frequent was the predominance of pibold coloring in domestic animals vs wild animals. This blond splotchiness was directly linked to docility and lower sexual activity.
full download here: ww.researchgate.net/publication/257045368_Do_pigmentation_and_the_melanocortin_system_modulate_aggression_and_sexuality_in_humans_as_they_do_in_other_animals
This paper proposes that there are racial and ethnic differences in psychopathic personality conceptualised as a continuously distributed trait, such that high values of the trait are present in blacks and Native Americans, intermediate values in Hispanics, lower values in whites and the lowest values in East Asians. Part one of the paper sets out the evidence for this thesis. Part two applies the thesis to the unresolved problem in The Bell Curve that racial and ethnic differences in a number of social phenomena such as crime, welfare dependency, rates of marriage, etc. cannot be fully explained by differences in intelligence and proposes that some of the residual disparities are attributable to differences in psychopathic personality. Part three of the paper integrates the theory with Rushton’s r-K theory of race differences.
no, every Holla Forumsack knew that already but the links are okay, and a refresher is always good for newfags
Michael Fisher
So does that mean that albino nigs are A-OK?
Asher Cooper
bump everyone knows this already, but not everybody knows that there was even a study for it
Kevin Flores
I guess this would explain why niggers are so horrible to animals and each other inb4 same thing
Nolan King
This seems hopelessly confounded by race to me. Obviously niggers are more violent than whites and asians, that's not hard to discover. It would be interesting to see if within mostly pure negro populations, the blacker ones are more violent, but this paper doesn't seem to show that. It claims there are within-population differences, but I don't see anything cited in there to back that up (and anything that did would have to account for the confounding effect of skin color correlating with % black ancestry, which could easily be the real causative factor).
