So how do brocialists justify voting Trump?

I know what it is mostly is boys like a bully. It's why you applaud Reddit mods banning people, or massively downvoting and raiding youtubers you don't like, or whatever… boys get some sick primal thrill out of tormenting others like monkeys.

But realistically, how can you call yourself a communist and allow this Neanderthal to get elected and destroy women's rights? And I don't mean suffrage, I'm not an idiot… Women's voting rights are not going to disappear, but planned parenthood very well could as could abortion rights.

And this isn't just a woman issue. Babies are bad for the economy, it puts women out of work for at least nine months and probably more unless you LIKE raising dindus and trailer park trash… and more importantly a rapid increase in children means an entire generation of struggling working class people who can't find work. You claim to care about working class people, but already in a job market that runs dry you want to insure there's an inflation of people looking for employment? Not smart at all… pretty dumb actually. Yikes.

So maybe you should like, leave Sargon of the Akkad vlogs and go outside, go to the local food drive and see all the people looking for work who can't find it, or go to a college campus and look at all those students busting their ass, studying for a mid-management position, and you're telling them this situation needs to be worse when there's no job market at all in a few years because you personally find abortion to be naughty.

...

Neanderthals were smart creatures bro, no need to be racist

Literal cancer, assuming this isn't bait

Literal spooks

It's just Holla Forumsup shitposters, calm down.

Intersectional feminists are no better. It's basically the difference between fascism and imperialism.

They are logically consistent, you can say that much

...

only on Holla Forums

It's simply to remove the people who are responsible for nominating Hillary

Bernie 2020

Trump and Hillary are both awful people and will make life worse for everyone.

If things get worse under Hillary, it will be blamed on "the left" and shift public opinion to the right.
If things get worse under Trump, it will be blamed on "the right" and shift public opinion to the left.

The choice should be obvious.

It might me easier to convince the normies that Hillary is right wing than with Obama.

who gives a fuck, he isn't winning anyway. Focus your anger on something that isnt this reality tv tier "presidental race"

calm down.

...

This.

You think we are voting for two candidates.

What we are really voting for is who gets blamed when the misandry bubble pops in 2~3 years.

Trump-voting brocialist here, several reasons, all of which I happen to subscribe to, to varying degrees:
Clinton will be able to do every evil thing she or her backers want because she has the unprecedented bi"partisan" support of the entire neocon/neolib establishment, from the legislature to the press, plus an army of SJW suicide bombers ready to act as human shields for her PR gaffs, and lynch mobs against her critics. Trump will have a very difficult time getting anything evil done because he has the hatred of the entire establishment, much of the populace and numerous ideological foes on both sides, with nothing but his personal bluster and some populist support. Clinton is also an experienced realpoliticker, while Trump is a complete n00b.

Simply put, Clinton is a vote for the status quo, and Trump is a Molotov through the window.

Clinton and her backers have a lengthy track record of pushing a loathsome neocon/neolib agenda, and has acquired a recent history throughout the Obama administration as a rampaging warhawk. Beyond being a porky capitalist, Trump has a muddled history ranging from side to side of the political spectrum on every issue, and has remained opaque and mercurial to date.

Clinton promises nothing good that wouldn't have happened under Obama if she were serious about them. Trump, while I wouldn't actually trust him to keep any of his mutually contradictory promises, is the first major politician since the 1970s to seriously support important issues such as trade protectionism, migration quotas, domestic industry, infrastructure, and military disengagement. Aside from the typical porky Reaganomics of Republicans, he is also the first major Republican to even momentarily let go of politically pointless red meat like attacking Social Security, Medicare, unions, sexual minorities, and yes, even abortion/birth control/etc.

The one issue I'm certain Trump will definitely make progress on is the deathly stranglehold SJWs have held over American leftism for decades, especially leadership positions of the far left, academia, the press, and the mishmash of bizarre laws they use as weapons. I assume this not because of any ideological position of Trump's, but because PC is the barbed wire through which Trump struggles and tears constantly. Clinton, on the other hand, has allied herself with all the worst elements of modern "leftism", and a Clinton presidency holds the remote but genuinely terrifying possibility of being hijacked by a strange new flavor of totalitarianism emerging from the mercilessly insatiable ideologues of this PC-wrapped crypto-fascist death cult.

I think the Greens are polling well enough to be well assured of 5%, but I don't think 15% is realistically possible except for the (barf) Libertarians. As such, this vote is down to the Democrats or Republicans IMHO.

Literally the only reason Clinton has the vote of the establishment is because of promises she's made for once she is in office. If Trump gets it instead, they'll all start kissing his ass instead like they did with Obama.

That would be, at worst, about like a less awful version of Dubya. After all the pegging they took up their asses to exult Clinton, on the other hand, how firm do you think their opposition to her will be?

It's not merely promises, though. She has a proven record of working for Wall Street and the military-intelligence apparatus.

That's almost certainly true, but, as , the right wing will also get the blame. It will also probably kill some of the alt-right's momentum when they see his campaign has been a massive fraud.

If Clinton wins, I imagine we'll get a more canny version of Trump in 4-8 years, and that Trump-like candidate will actually be able to win.

This makes sense in theory, but people will blame literally anything on The Left(tm). Trump could unironically blame communists and people would believe him.

This is the best argument there is for voting for Clinton. Whoever wins is walking into a no-win shitstorm with the economy poised to go into a depression. Whoever wins will take the blame. I would rather see that happen to an establishment neo-lib than to an """"anti""""-establishment candidate.

After the clean break B████crats made following his betrayal, what are the chances of Trump getting away with a really blatant backstab (TPP-like treaties, increased migration, military quagmire, etc)? I think Trump's supporters are a lot dumber than [REDACTED]'s, but probably not that much dumber.

The 'Trump supporting brocialist' is a HRC campaign meme that is exploited by Holla Forumsyps.

No one here, except maybe a few of the newer leftists who came over from Holla Forums or Holla Forums within the last 12 months, support Trump.

Now, what's your justification for hating trans people?

Don't forget, that is the poster who hates infants and dummies who swallowed some form of the genderpill. Sorry if this is a chauvinist expression, but they did not read properly Lacan, no?

The post is bait, but, aside from that, I've always wondered why so many liberals are obsessed with bullying.

What gets me is how they try to call every contrary act "bullying." Saying mean things is "bullying" by the current standard, which is complete bullshit. Bullying is when someone uses force and intimidation to systematically abuse and humiliate another person over a long period of time. Saying mean things to sensitive people is not in the same neighborhood.

Nothing is going to happend to abortion rights as Trump doesn't give a shit. His answer was to leave it to the states, which means it stays where it is largly, although a gradual shitt will occur independent of Trump.

Nothing is going to happend to abortion rights as Trump doesn't give a shit. His answer was to leave it to the states, which means it stays where it is largly, although a gradual shitt will occur independent of Trump.

come on comrades, you're smarter than this

Don't want nuclear war tbh.

...

A Trump winning will grant that the public opinion will turn against all these rightist non-sense America seems to love so much thanks to his future fuck ups and also grant that we'll have a revolution in the future.
If shillary wins the opposite is gonna happen and we'll see fascism in the future.

Saying it ironically isn't any better.

Your naivety is cute

hi reddit

lol. Are you new? Or are we seeing a new level of the resident anfem's shitposting meta?