What has happened instead, a half century on from the sexual revolution, is something more complicated — a total hegemonic fusion of the corporate and the countercultural, of progressivism, modernity, and the market. It is pregnancy, not birth control, that burdens our current system with awkward unprofitable human functions and needs.
The Market Theocracy
(1/2)
(2/2)
New white babies are a burden to the American economy. Here goy, accept all these poor refugees
This is pure, unadulterated, communist horseshit.
What the fuck am I reading?
You already know there is an agenda
This is great if you read between the lines. This attacks neoliberalism, but not explicitly.
or rather it gives data points that can be used for that purpose, Microsoft, Amazon's Bezos and Wall Street are more an enemy of women and childbearing than our republicans.
Care to translate. My mind goes into a fog when I try to read this garbage…
Just finished it. The attacks are indeed thinly veiled.
tl;dr it remarks that consumer culture disrupts the incentives to have children, something we already know here.
It remarks upon the lack of social prestige that a mother has. I wonder (((who))) could be behind that? We just need to keep flooding the gates with our propaganda showing that having a family is the most fulfilling thing a woman can do
Guarantee this kike shills for refugees while shaming and demonizing white women for wanting what is completely natural for them to want: families. This kike deserves the rope.
Not op
What i gathered instead of validating the problems faced by women today, on the consequences of the results of 1st & 2nd wave feminism it instead suggest the root cause is the free market.
when did such retards start posting here???
Thank you. Yes, we need to push the meme that progressives are the real sexists (tm). Just kidding, but yes, mothers not only have low prestige, they are actually spat upon by far-left regressives.
is reading too hard for you???
This post was meant for you buddy>>9907156
Seems pretty obvious to me. Though honestly it kinda comes off a little bit to much like another version of "dems are the real racist" to get my seal of approval.
That's the problem, if you try and reinforce to women that they have a huge responsibility to bear children. They see this as an attack on their freedom of choice.
But if they don't do this our society and culture dies. But try to explain that to a self absorb white women engulfed in consumer culture.
Hulu is staffed with faggots, spics and leafs. Their code is written by chinks and their business model panders to numales and cat ladies who watch shit.
lol you have had your critical thinking damaged greatly by TRS if that's what you directly go to in a discussion of how the free market and jew led capitalism is why white people do not have the time nor the resources to procreate.
Last time we accomplished this it was called the renaissance and celebrated for the next 500+ years.
No you idiot. Do you think this kike really wants white birthrates? They want shitskin birthrates at whites expense. The only reason they are shilling for families is so they can drown us in a sea of niggers.
Don't directly pressure them, stand in their defense and attack these atheist child-free supporters. In the same way women support them giving the choice to have a career they will support their right to start a family if you point out that leftist elements are trying to frame them as lesser people for wanting one. You could very much dress this up in social justice language and accuse anti-family faggots of being problematic for prizing the economic worth of working women over those raising children as well as the typical arguments that birth control is a eugenics campaign against those society deems undesirable. Just spitballing here because I think wrapping this up in feminism is actually a great way to both spread pro-family arguments and get women questioning other feminist beliefs.
I understand that. But still what is this guys suggested solution? Soft communism? It just seems like the angle this guys going for in a few places is that same stupid hack dr3 type angle of, "the problems actually the free market and you've supported the free market all along, so wohaho what do you think of that women? huh huh?".
The free markets the real patriarchy, sounds just as stupid written out as it would coming out of any shitlibs mouth. nor sound that far off from something they'd actually say
I don't want to sound like a defeatist.
But at this time women are being steered into the direction of putting off kids or not having kids at all. We all know why, but with-out any real policy changes at the top.
It's going to be very hard to swing the 'mob' into the other direction.
I'm being negative, but i don't see the majority of people as redpillable, women especially they don't seem to care for much other than their short term interests.
If we are going to make a change it's going to take decades to reverse, i have high hopes for male gen z,
and i can only hope that they remain steadfast in their conservative ideology and brute force their way into positions of power.
Promote traditional values where the women's main responsibility is to bear, raise and care for children.
When this is the narrative most women will automatically conform much in the way they currently conform to liberalism, there will be no need for soft socialism.
So we should just let the legbeards literally die out because they won't reproduce, just like with fags.
Checked. In the free market we just have to promote that choosing to raise your family is the most beneficial choice. Women have maternal instincts that are highly exploitable, assuming we're dealing with women who haven't had those instincts wiped out by kike propaganda (luckily these women are still the minority)
To clarify I meant that women who have lost their natural instincts are in the minority. Sorry for the shit phrasing.
The problem with women though is that they aren't racially aware. They will lose their shit over any kind of baby, no matter how removed from their race.
Or SJWs always double down.
You are reading a severely stupid review of the new media onslaught "A Handmaid's Tale," which is in fact not new, but a re-tread of a 1980s story.
Vox Day claims to be a person of color with nonwhite blood. What is he doing here?
You're forgetting, legbeards are born through propoganda and programming, not special hugs. Letting them die unconverted is a 100% success for the jew who just killed another bloodline of whities
All good man, i gathered you were referring to cat ladies.
I don't know how this can be done i can't think of anything from the top of my head, you don't earn money when raising children.
Well they are the submissive gender what can you do it's in their nature.
...
And have this fine Atlantic article afterwards:
theatlantic.com
Peggy Atwood was brought up by hippie biologists and developed an early liking for the red man's cock. Her "science fiction" is just a natural outgrowth of her daddy issues.
t. Michael Enright
This fucker sounds exactly like Bob Mcdonald
If you remove all the Stumpf bashing it reads like a straight criticism of what (((feminism))) has done to women.
Literally who is Jacobin?
check
By the time most women start thinking long term, they are already infertile.
Retard.
B-but we don't have enough workers now to pay all our welfare bux!
We need immigrants to do the jobs whites don't want to to do! (because they were never born)
>en.wikipedia.org
PFFFFFFFFFFFFTHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
These people are completely insane, and I fucking hate their ilk.
...
...
No, see, THAT'S the problem - that we gave women the idea they have a 'freedom of choice'.
See, I had a buddy recently try to social signal at me about how he's "okay with a strong, independent woman", because his mom - a divorcee - did a lot to help him. It was at this point that I had to, rather awkwardly, explain that there is no such thing as an independent woman, never has been.
The current society only allows women to feel as though they are independent, but they aren't - just as in the past they would have to rely on a man for nearly everything, particularly defense, women now have the State of Man to provide that for them.
Thus, we've effectively tricked women into thinking they can be free, independent entities - while the reality is quite the opposite: the moment the State of Man ceases to protect them via the applied force/violence of men employed by that state in exchange for shekels, the fraud of female independence becomes painfully, bloodily obvious.
Our forefathers told women they had choice. They told them they were equal, and could have a say. And in doing so, created as system that worked harder and harder to convince women of those blatant falsehoods, doing so by creating a faux-man in the form of an enormous state apparatus that primarily serves women's needs and interests.
Its not a woman's father or brother or husband or even sons that she looks to now, when she needs that male factor in her life - she looks to the government, and it provides what is needed to maintain the illusion: a stream of men, employed in exchange for shekels, to do for women all the things they used to have to maintain relationships to achieve, and what's more, to enforce upon others various conditions for the sake of the women's continued maintenance of this delusion of 'freedom'.
So, the problem isn't that women see attempt to reinforce their responsibility for childbirth/rearing as an attack on their freedom - the problem is that you gave them the delusional idea that they have any freedom of choice whatsoever, that they can ever truly be independent, and to allow them to maintain that fantasy, you've built a fucking huge state monster, a faux-man, that woman can turn to instead of men, lest they be forced to directly face the reality: that they are entirely dependent on men, whether those they have relationships with or those the faux-state employs to provide for them.
Hah, i just realized…
We turned out women into Carthage.
Now, instead of seeking "military force" in the form of homegrown "soldiers", they seek to employ "mercenaries".
They abandon the Gods of sanctity and femininity for aberrant hunched figures, entities of carnal delight that sup upon the flesh of babies handed into its fiery grasp by their own mother's trembling hands, an act those mothers are then applauded for, called "brave" for pursuing.
For we, the "Roman" men, there is only one option as regards Carthage.
We shall have to destroy it so utterly that only vague and fearful memory remains.
What the fuck are you talking about retard OP. What is "trad" about saying there should be less white children. This is pure Commie filth and anti-traditionalism.
What?
Been reading the book for an hour or so, 1/3rd in.
Nonstop meaningless internal dialog.
The whole up to this point can be summed up as:
Most people are infertile because of polution.
There is a state cult.
1984 style "war" against rebels. This is short of spelled out.
Protagonist is a regular woman which married and had a daughter after college. Tried to flee with her husband and daughter, but they are captured, the girl is taken away and her husband may have been killed, imprisoned or managed to escape.
She with other girls is indoctrinated to be chaste and forced to act as surrogates for the supposedly infertile wives of men in power, and run errands, in a unnecesarily creepy cult-like way.
Despite of this being done due to the critically low birthrates, these men are old and possibly infertile themselves.
Why these girls are not just paired off with young fertile men is not explained, other than because crazy cult religion.
The Wives resent said girls and act bitchlike to them.
Democrats are the real racists
Dems r real racist
DR3
He isn't completely wrong. Free market is what enables the kike to infiltrate and subvert.
That's just the lack of gas chambers.
I was forced to read this book way back in high school, I remember hating it but thinking "maybe it's only cause I'm being forced to read it." Nah, turns out the book was indeed just as godawful as I remember.
Finally, they admit it. The left can't stop portraying themselves as the underdogs fighting and entrenched system, when in reality, they are the system. They've been in power for decades, and they think beating the same dead horse is actually slaying some sacred cow.
Nothing says prestige like being a 30+ year old woman alone and childless. But hey you go on vacations to the Dominican Republic twice a year and NYC every other weekend. Gotta keep that instragram stacked with photos to show how much of an independent trendy jet setter you are. The thing is women don't want the traditional life of their grand parents until they realize their chance to have it is gone.
Finding a woman who doesn't care about the glamour and glitz and just wants a traditional life and to make babies isn't easy these days.
There's nothing wrong with being racist, it's a survival-instinct.
No, they are the useful idiots that is doing our enemies work for them. Without these useful idiots and traitors, our enemies are old fragile jewish men living on their seventh pig-heart.
Seriously think about it, without other people doing their bidding and believing the lies of ((modern civilisation)), a pack of school-kids could beat these plights of society within a few days.
Even if you do explain it they don't care. "If there's no God then let it all burn down." And that's why you have to believe in God to have civilization of some sort. And that's why some crazy bitches just gotta be burned cuz they don't care.
Women are more social creatures, they'll do whatever is better socially. So you don't need god, but to make them believe giving life to and raising the next generation is not only important (duty works for men, but not for women) but respected by other people and what others expect them to do (e.g. they're shunned as a crazy cat lady if they don't). Selling people on god at this point would be a very hard sell, the Church has been trying for years and yet the numbers keep going down.
Alright, back at it.
The obviously dike girl-friend of the protagonist (stronk, fixes her own car, acts like an action hero when the situation calls for it) is, suprise, a dike.
This book might as well have been called The Telegraph.
The ramblings of someone with a sandy vagina, and/or a cat lady.
She is taken to a whorehouse by the husband, where the dike is working, and starts fucking the chaffeur every day. Se gets ratted out, the chaffeur is part of le resistance and the secret service both, and helps her to flee. We don't know what happens to her afterward, other than her audio-diary of the story up to this point is found and treated like a historical artifact in the future. The end.
I have read better fanfiction written as a lark.
Do you imagine future societies as more developed than current societies?
What do you think that will happen if you choose not to have offspring on which to impart your views?
A man can choose not to pass on his genes. Women as a group can choose not to allow a man's genes to be passed down.
The most powerful thing a woman can do is to teach her children to be better than herself. A woman cannot call herself a feminist if she chooses not to take part in the most empowering aspect of womanhood.
Women hold all the positions of power in the continued advancement and expansion of society. What have you progressed?
It's easy to argue that traditional female roles are essential to feminism.
It's also easy to appeal to any woman's innate desires.
It's also easy to hang them with their own selfishness.