Mega info dump

Race can be determined via brain scans:
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

Stay-at-home moms are much more happy than women who work part- or even fulltime: Vanderkam, L. (z.d). Stay-at-Home Moms by the Numbers. Consulted on 11-10-2016 via redbookmag.com/life/mom-kids/a43578/stay-at-home-mom-survey/#our-survey

+Whites from families with incomes of less than $10,000 had a mean SAT score of 993. This is 129 points higher than the national mean for all blacks.
+Whites from families with incomes below $10,000 had a mean SAT test score that was 61 points higher than blacks whose families had incomes of between $80,000 and $100,000.
+Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000.
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000.
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Genetic influences on brain morphology and IQ are well studied. A variety of sophisticated brain-mapping approaches relating genetic influences on brain structure and intelligence establishes a regional distribution for this relationship that is consistent with behavioral studies. We highlight those studies that illustrate the complex cortical patterns associated with measures of cognitive ability. A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to genetic.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931

The genealogy of taste perception:
Along with environmental and cultural factors affecting our food choices, there is evidence that genetic makeup influences how we experience taste. The basic tastes of sweet, sour, salty, bitter and umami are detected when chemicals that produce those tastes bind with certain receptors on our tongues. We all have different amounts of these various receptors, depending on our DNA, and research has shown that sensitivity to one particular bitter compound (which is easy to measure, and is a marker of overall taste sensitivity) varies wildly between different countries. In some parts of Asia, South America and Africa, as much as 85% of native populations are highly sensitive tasters. Ethnic Europeans sit at the lower end of the scale.
theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/wordofmouth/2013/sep/03/geography-taste-how-food-preferences-formed

All about racial differences - from alleles to Jews being a race, to personality.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19934/#!po=46.4286

This paper examines the distribution of national personality dimensions in geographical space. The relationship between geographical location and aggregate personality in a wide range of nations is quantified using spatial autocorrelation, and it is found that the personalities of nations that are geographical neighbours are more similar than those that are far apart. The five factors of both the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Big Five Inventory (BFI), all show a significant degree of spatial organization. The personality factors most strongly associated with geographical location are NEO-PI-R extraversion and BFI conscientiousness; both vary with position around the globe about as much as the physical climate. These findings support previous research suggesting associations between aggregate personality and geography, and imply that the sources of variation in national personality are themselves geographically organized.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02099.x/abstract

Besides establishing national IQ levels, Richard Lynn also started and inspired studies attempting to find out regularities behind the national differences in personality. Recent large-scale collaborative projects involving hundreds of psychologists from about 50 countries allowed for determination of the aggregate national scores of personality for the most popular personality models, including the Big Five. These studies have already revealed several universal and geographically regular patterns in the global personality trait distributions. The area of the study of national differences in personality has arguably matured to a level where it can start to help solving fundamental problems such as the relationship between genes, culture, and personality.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886911002418

Racial differences in personality, behavior, and family environment of lower elementary school children were examined in a sample of 433 black and 897 white children. Numerous significant differences in scores on scales of the Missouri Children's Picture Series, the Missouri Children's Behavior Checklist, and the Family Environment Scale persisted after adjustment for socioeconomic status.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2609770/
Trusting neighbors and strangers in a racially diverse society: Insights from survey data in South Africa, Dorrit Posel and Tim Hinks - University of KwaZulu-Natal and University of the West England, is a study of trust in South Africa and trust among strangers vs neighbors. When asked 'who do you trust more to return a lost wallet, a neighbor or stranger?' both Blacks and Whites report the same number of trust within their neighbors when adjusted for socioeconomic status, but, in conclusion "[If a stranger is assumed to be Black, then our results suggest that Black South Africans are more trusting than Whites of other Blacks, a finding that would be consistent with in-group bias.]"

Where trust is high, crime is low:
pewglobal.org/2008/04/15/where-trust-is-high-crime-and-corruption-are-low/

Increase in Social Capital Decreases Crime:
[PDF]Social Capital, Crime, and Human Nature - LSE

"A study has found [in the U.K.] that an increase in “diversity” makes existing residents of a area feel unhappier and more socially isolated, while those leaving for more homogenous areas populated by their own ethic group often get happier."
academia.edu/3479330/Does_Ethnic_Diversity_Have_a_Negative_Effect_on_Attitudes_towards_the_Community_A_Longitudinal_Analysis_of_the_Causal_Claims_within_the_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Cohesion_Debate

Average IQ for
Whites: 103.4
Blacks: 87.7
Hispanics: 91.1
Asians: 106.1
WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS: Advanced Clinical Interpretation: books.google.ca/books?id=-XmMpVllgpQC&pg=PA190&lpg=PA190&dq=wais-iv whites SD&source=bl&ots=MRN75j2KMg&sig=r6oy5FuT0Tjre0O_c3NKBn-A5ag&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjY2KCBkafPAhVm5oMKHe3RBVkQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=wais-iv whites SD&f=false

WAIS-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation by Weiss LG et al. (2010), Table 4.3, p. 118:
White, 103.21 (13.77), 1540
Black, 88.67 (13.68), 260
Hispanic, 91.63 (14.29), 289
Asian, 106.07 (15.01), 71
Other*, 98.93 (13.99), 40

According to National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) the gap between Hispanics and Whites are the following:
White Hispanic: (WH)
Non-ELL Hispanic: (ELL)
White Non-ELL Hispanic: (W)
MATHEMATICS:
4th Grade: 21(WH), 19 (ELL) and 14 (W)
8th Grade: 26 (WH), 34 (ELL) and 19 (W)
READING:
4th Grade: 25 (WH), 29 (ELL) and 19 (W)
8th Grade: 26 (WH), 39 (ELL) and 15 (W)
nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/gaps/

"[N]on-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the Danish army’s intelligence test than native Danes: “19.3% of non-Western immigrants are not able to pass the Danish army’s intelligence test. In comparison, only 4.7% of applicants with Danish background do not pass.”
nyhederne.tv2.dk/article.php/id-7248606.html?ss

According to Insidehighered.com, SAT scores with three subsets, Critical Reading (CR), Mathematics (MM) and Writing (WT), for different ethnicities were the following: Black, 431 (CR), 428 (MM) and 418 (WT). Hispanic, 448 (CR), 457 (MM) and 438 (WT).
White, 529 (CR), 534 (MM) and 513 (WT).
Asian, 525 (CR), 598 (MM) and 531 (WT).

According to Garrett Jones, Economist at George Mason University Economic Department, your nation's (average) IQ matters more than your own: "The book’s primary and most important contribution is to document the following empirical regularity: Suppose you could a) improve your own IQ by 10 points, or b) improve the IQs of your countrymen (but not your own) by 10 points. Which would do more to increase your income? The answer is (b), and it’s not even close. The latter choice improves your income by about 6 times more than the former choice," Tim Groseclose, holder of Adam Smith Chair at the Mercatus Center, an American non-profit think tank.

"A one-point increase in IQ is associated with a 4% increase in welfare growth for the average country. Our results support the view that national IQ is an important determinant of cross-country differences in economic activity and welfare."
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028961630318X

If the idea behind transitioning is for an individual with Gender Dysphoria to overcome anxiety and or depression, I would like to point out that transformation has ambigous effects and "[It should therefore come as no surprise that studies have found high rates of depression,[9] and low quality of life[16], [25] also after sex reassignment]:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043071/#!po=62.6437

41% of Transgender'd people have attempted suicide in their life, 3x higher than the population's mean:
articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/28/local/la-me-ln-suicide-attempts-alarming-transgender-20140127

To put it into prospective, according to allaboutdepression.com, 15% of those clinically depressed commit suicide; according the the Center for Disease Control, adults between 18-25 years old have the highest rate of attempted suicide at 7.4% and according to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) the age-adjusted suicide rate is 13.26 per 100k.

So, to adjust these, transgender people are 2.73x more likely to attempt suicide than the depressed are to commit suicide; they are 5.54x more likely to attempt suicide than the highest category of attempties and they are 3.09x more likely to attempt suicide than those who commit suicide.

Now, one may claim this is due to factors of environment towards trans, but according to studies, 54.3% of transsexuals have little to no experience in family rejection. 31.3% reported moderate rejection and 14.3% reported high rejection.
online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0111

So for the sake of the argument, we will combine moderate and high rejection together, coming to a rejection percentage of 45.6%. When taking out 41, the percentage is moved to 18.696% of transsexuals attempting suicide due to nonenvironmental reasons involving family.

To further demonstrate the case of environmental factors, we will use "[One of the biggest studies on the experiences of transgender people was the 2011 National Transgender Discrimination Survey (NTDS). It found that in the U.S., 41 percent of transgender and gender non-conforming people had attempted suicide, compared to a national average of just 4.6 percent……A brand new study from Canada confirms this effect. There, the suicide attempt rate for transgender people was similar to what other studies have found: about 18 times higher than the general population. But the study found that some factors greatly reduced the attempt rate. For example, when transgender people had affirming parents, the rate dropped by 57 percent. Access to legal documentation consistent with their gender identity dropped rates by 44 percent. Trans people who experienced low levels of anti-trans hate were 66 percent less likely to attempt suicide.]"
thinkprogress.org/no-high-suicide-rates-do-not-demonstrate-that-transgender-people-are-mentally-ill-5074c09a5827

For this we will focus on "Trans people who experienced low levels of anti-trans hate were 66 percent less likely to attempt suicide" since it can be used as an umbrella factor for negative environmental impacts and has the greatest impact generally overall.

66% of 41% comes out to 13.94% of transsexuals committing or attempting suicide due non-environmental factors, which is 3.03 times the national average's rate of 4.6.

Now, would you not say that if your solution to a problem resulted in a significant proportion of your patients attempting suicide, than that method is a failure? This is why I am of the opinion that we should seek treatment through other means, preferably like any other disorder - through a combination of therapy and medication.

Anti-Poverty Problems; Social Welfare.

Using current definition of poverty by the Untied States' Census Bureau, the current definition of poverty has been "[developed in the mid 1960s.]"
census.gov/topics/income-poverty/poverty/about/history-of-the-poverty-measure.html

+In 1959, poverty was at 27.3%
+Poverty until 1965 had been in a decline about 1% per year, reaching downwards of 21.0%.
+Poverty met its lowest peak in 1969, at 14.0%
+ Poverty then increased to 15.1% the following year, 1970.
+Poverty since has continued to flex, reaching its highest peak since 1960 at 22.7% in 1993.
+Since 1993, poverty's lowest peak has been set at 16.2% in 2000; poverty's highest point at 22.0% in 2010.
+As of currently, poverty sits at 19.7% as of 2015.
www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/time-series/historical-poverty-people/hstpov4.xls

"With private social welfare spending included, the grand total for social welfare expenditures reached $181.6 billion in fiscal year 1969"
google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v32n12/v32n12p3.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjahM-c8sHSAhWrgFQKHXqHCb0QFggaMAA&usg=AFQjCNHYFIpODcFE2u4QCoX_2zauLDhg1Q

"These programs spent $361 billion and $373 billion in 2015 and 2016, respectively."
google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://federalsafetynet.com/welfare-budget.html&ved=0ahUKEwj9xvC68sHSAhXkgVQKHYZWA_kQFggmMAI&usg=AFQjCNEBPDsvE9q-pjdda2pg_cNHXe3dbg

A more accurate measurement of poverty has been used by the Census Bureau, called S.P.M. (Supplementary Poverty Measure). With this new measurement, for 2012, poverty increased from 15.1% to 16.0%.
census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p60-247.pdf

Well, you may explain the new amount of spending on population growth. More people means you would be more inclined to spend a greater amount of money, but in 1969 the U.S. population was 202,676,946 people. In 2010, 310,232,863. So, about a little over a 57%, give or take, increase of population with about a 100% or near double amount of spending in Anti-Poverty Programs.
fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?dsrcid=225439#rows:id=1

From this data, we must conclude that Social Welfare programs is not as originally intended working as a means to end poverty, as poverty has not been eliminated as planned. We must too conclude that welfare, in its current form, is neither a safety net too for those financially devastated seeing from the rates of poverty still present. In order to drive out poverty we must seek other solutions as Welfare and Anti-Poverty programs, as demonstrated are not a means to the end of poverty or work as a safety net.

"Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth were significantly more likely to attempt suicide in the previous 12 months, compared with heterosexuals (21.5% vs 4.2%). Among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth, the risk of attempting suicide was 20% greater in unsupportive environments compared to supportive environments."
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081186/

ovc.gov/pubs/forge/sexual_numbers.html#victims

"The CDC’s 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, released again in 2013 with new analysis, reports in its first-ever study focusing on victimization by sexual orientation that the lifetime prevalence of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner was 43.8 percent for lesbians, 61.1 percent for bisexual women, and 35 percent for heterosexual women, while it was 26 percent for gay men, 37.3 percent for bisexual men, and 29 percent for heterosexual men (this study did not include gender identity or expression).

The National Violence Against Women survey found that 21.5 percent of men and 35.4 percent of women living with a same-sex partner experienced intimate-partner physical violence in their lifetimes, compared with 7.1 percent and 20.4 percent for men and women, respectively, with a history of only opposite-sex cohabitation. Transgender respondents had an incidence of 34.6 percent over a lifetime according to a Massachusetts survey."
advocate.com/crime/2014/09/04/2-studies-prove-domestic-violence-lgbt-issue

Traditional Gender Roles make Men and Women Happier:
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886914003882

Couples who share the housework are more likely to divorce, study finds:
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9572187/Couples-who-share-the-housework-are-more-likely-to-divorce-study-finds.html

Stay-at-home mothers are happier than "independent" girls obsessed with career like men:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2381647/Stay-home-mothers-happiest-Women-dont-return-work-suffer-feelings-boredom-worthlessness.html

According to the Center for Immigration Studies, "In 2012, 51 percent of households headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) reported that they used at least one welfare program during the year, compared to 30 percent of native households. Welfare in this study includes Medicaid and cash, food, and housing programs……Welfare use is high for both new arrivals and well-established immigrants. Of households headed by immigrants who have been in the country for more than two decades, 48 percent access welfare. "

Breaking this down to orgin of immigrantion, the C.I.S. says, "Welfare use varies among immigrant groups. Households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico (73 percent), the Caribbean (51 percent), and Africa (48 percent) have the highest overall welfare use. Those from East Asia (32 percent), Europe (26 percent), and South Asia (17 percent) have the lowest."

According to Pew Research, in 2014 the percentage for receiving welfare income for Hispanics was 3.9%, African American 5.0% and Whites 2.0%.
pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states/

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Commerce:
percent of welfare recipients who are white/caucasian: 16.8 %
Percent of welfare recipients who are black: 39.6%
Percent of welfare recipients who are Hispanic: 21.2%

For reference, Social Capital is defined as, "the networks of relationships among people who live and work in a particular society, enabling that society to function effectively."

As Diversity Increases, Social Capital Decreases, R. Putnum: [neighborhood residents…tend to 'hunkerdown] and [trust…community cooperation and fewer friends] are had.
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.515.6374&rep=rep1&type=pdf&ved=0ahUKEwiTusHBh7fSAhVE72MKHVHOCucQFgg1MAI&usg=AFQjCNHSwKfSnBtM4EgCh_jw9tZ4hsJygA&sig2=k-orNWHgeG4gNGZpUrG-oQ

Sandra Susan Smith, Department of Socialogy, University of California, Berkeley, California:
"Conclusion: Race is most important determination of trust. This review of the literature is an effort to explicate why. Although the research includes qualitative and quantitative research on Blacks, Whites, Lations, and Asians, the bulk of the review focus on Blacks and Whites, the trust gap is starkest, and the black-white trust gap cannot be easily accounted for such factors as class. Instead, a careful review of literature highlights the roles of historical contemporary discrimination, neighborhood context, and enthnoracial socialization to explain enthnoracial differences in generalized trust, and the differences in the extent of embeddedness in structures of trust worthiness help us to understand ethnoracial difference in strategic trust."

66% of Americans believe that immigrants should required to learn English.
isidewith.com/poll/410509290

77% say it is essential:
gallup.com/poll/163895/say-essential-immigrants-learn-english.aspx

Even higher for Canadians at 78%.
canada.isidewith.com/poll/410509290

Not once in the last 51 years have the majority agreed we should increase the percentage of immigration. The consensus is Majority wishes for either Present Level or Decreased Immigration. With Non-Hispanics Whites wanting Decreased immigrants at 42% and Present Level at 36% as of Jun-July, 2016.
gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.aspx

Whites, upon learning that they would be a minority by 2050, become increasingly against multiculturalism, a bases for Integrated Threat Theory?
phys.org/news/2014-10-minority-whites-declining-diversity-psychology.html

The “Obama Effect”? Priming Contemporary Racial Milestones Increases Implicit Racial Bias among Whites
guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.544

According to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, “Two-thirds of whites say that immigrants should give up some important aspects of their culture to blend in; only about four in ten Hispanics, and an equal number of blacks, agree with that view."
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/28/cnn-poll-melting-pot-weakening-country/?fbid=_rInOlRnr2I

I'm done.

There's some good stuff in this thread at >>>/pdfs/3388

I'll scavenge some good stuff to post if the mods don't shoah this thread.

DUB TRIPS CONFIRM GOOD STUFF
volkischpaganism.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/miguel-serrano-nos-the-book-of-the-resurrection.pdf

CHECKED BY BIGPOSTER

Gottfried Feder, MANIFESTO FOR THE ABOLITION OF INTEREST-SLAVERY
The economic manifesto which held influence on the N.S.D.A.P. and on Adolf Hitler himself; over-viewing everything from the Nationalsozialistische's desire to end usury, to nationalization of the banking system and the core economic foundation of National Soc-ialism itself, a must read to understanding the inner workings of Germany's economic successes.

Gottfried Feder, THE PROGRAMME OF THE N.S.D.A.P. AND ITS GENERAL CONCEPTIONS
The offic-ial positions and manifesto of the N.S.D.A.P., discussing the issues of property rights and land ownership, to the issues of unemployment and religion, and the 25 Points of National Soc-ialism itself.

Adolf Hitler, MEIN KAMPF - THE STALAG EDITION:
The complete and only offic-ial authorized English translation of Mein Kampf and the first book of Adolf Hitler, the German Chancellor who had brought the National Soc-ialist German Workers' Party's ideals to the forefront of the world; covering everything from Hitler's views on nation and race, to the ideal Völkisch State and the struggle with the Reds for power in the German Revolution of 1918. A must-read for any National Soc-ialist and those curious about the history of National Soc-ialism's ideological bases.

S.S. RACE THEORY AND MATE SELECTION GUIDELINES, GLAUBEN UND KAMPFEN ("Faith and Struggle")
Originally intended for members of the S.S. from the ethnic German communities in the south of Europe, these guidelines highlight the importance of the German Volk - from the origin of German-Nordic race, to the significance of marriage selection and the eugenics practiced under German Law, all questions one could have about Germany's policies regarding genetics is answered in this one guide.

Joseph Goebbels, NAZI-SOZI - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR NATIONAL SOC-IALIST
Questions for and answered by Dr. Goebbels, the Reich Minister of Propaganda, overlaying everything from the 10 Commandments for National Soc-ialist, to the class-struggle and the one party state, and rather the fate of Germany lays in a republic or monarchy laid out all in one book.

Hulmet Stellrecht, FAITH AND ACTION, FOR THE HITLER YOUTH
The N.S.D.A.P.'s book of virtues describing the qualities and morality that is to be upheld by the Hitler Youth, covering from the nobility of law, justice and the need for courage, to the necessarily of German Soc-ialism and the meaning of what it means to furfill one's duty.

THESE ARE THE 6 MUST READ BOOKS ABOUT GERMAN NATIONAL SOCIALISM

i forgot to add the header at the top of the post

Does anybody have any books/info about the work of Ahnenerbe and Thule?

I'll have to look around for anything specific but this book was responsible for it's foundation, I believe.

campbellmgold.com/archive_esoteric/oera_linda_book_sandbach_1876.pdf

Lolwut. 13% of the normal population does not attempt suicide.

stormfront.org/forum/t823063/

The annual age-adjusted suicide rate is 13.26 per 100,000 individuals.
afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/

Found an interesting documentary for those interested.

Looking for pills to put into video format. Been editing for a long time

Bump since there's not really any good threads going on right now.

bump, we've got some good shit going keep it up guys

...

anyone got redpills on white birthrates?

ALL JEWS WILL BE EXTERMINATED

good thread

you failed at your jewish attempt at engineering a hitlerian sextet. kek will not be mocked, shitposting faggots.

Requesting friendly zombie diet threads

Here guys, I completely forgot a wrote this argument a while back:

GETTING RID OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WILL MAKE FOOD PRICES TOO HIGH: NOT!

"In 2012, there were 3.2 million farmers, ranchers and other agricultural managers and an estimated 757,900 agricultural workers were legally employed in the US. Animal breeders accounted for 11,500 of those workers with the rest categorized as miscellaneous agricultural workers. The median pay was $9.12 per hour or $18,970 per year."
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_the_United_States

So, let's say we took all agricultural workers who work for $9.12 an hour and decided to raise their wage to $15 an hour.

$15 - $9.12 = $5.88

$5.88 an hour times the hours per year comes out to a $12,230.4 increase per worker.

Now times the number of workers in ALL of agriculture, 3,957,900, comes out to $48,406,700,160 per year in higher wage cost.

Now, $48,406,700,160 divided by the U.S. population comes out to $151.79 a year in extra food prices per individual or $607.16 per four person family.

Keep in mind, this was with 3.2 million farmers (not ranch hands), ranchers and mangers factored in. Let's try just workers this time, yeah?

$5.88 × 2,080h × 757,900 workers = 9,269,420,160 a year in food.

Now, divided by the population, the new prices are 29.0668553151 extra per individual now.

So, food would only rise $29.06 dollars a year or $116.36 for a four person family.

To further explain this, according to PewHispanic, only 4% of illegals work in agriculture:
pewhispanic.org/2015/03/26/share-of-unauthorized-immigrant-workers-in-production-construction-jobs-falls-since-2007/

With 11 million illegals in the U.S. with only 4% in agriculture, that's 440,000 workers total.

For shit and giggles, let's say illegals make $1 an hour and if we hired American we paid the medium wage of $9.12 an hour. That's a 800.12% increase in wages.

So, $8.12 x 2,080h = 16,889.6 a year in higher wages per worker.

16,889.6 x 440,000 = 7,431,424,000

7,431,424,000 ÷ 318.9 million = $23.30 per individual or an increase of $93.2 a year in food prices.

Let's do a more realistic wage now and say illegal immigrants get $4 an hour in wages.

Let's only an increase of $14.69 a year per individual or $58.77 a year per 4 person family.

More on illegals:

According to the Congress of the Untied States, Congressional Budget Office, "[the tax revenue that unauthorized immigrants generate for state and local governments do not offset the total cost of service provided to those immigrants.]"

For example:
"Revenues Versus Spending
The available estimates of the budgetary impact of unauthorized immigrants vary greatly in their timing and scope. Most of the studies that include both revenues and
costs for multiple programs show that state and local governments spend more on unauthorized immigrants than
they collect in revenues from that population. For example: Recent estimates indicate that annual costs for unauthorized immigrants in Colorado were between $217 million and $225 million for education, Medicaid, and corrections. By comparison, taxes collected from unauthorized immigrants at both the state and local levels amounted to an estimated $159 million to $194 million annually."

I wrote this a while back to counter faggots who said 'lol civil will won't matter you'll lose.'

Why Small Numbers Matter:

Now, you may claim 'well, there's only a small amount of separatist, nationalist, racist and so on,' and I'm forced to agree, since I have yet to see a poll or static giving us a real number of how many there really are. You may continue on in your statement with 'so there's really no reason to even worry about these people because of how small their numbers really are,' which I am inclined to disagree upon looking at the history of uprisings and revolutions.

For three (3) examples I give you:

+The American Revolution
Which had 6.5% of the population participate in the war effort at the height of the war.

+The Yugoslavia Civil War.
Now this is a tremendous war. For sake of narrowing it down, we will focus on beginning of the conflict, the Ten-Day War. During the rise of the conflict, Slovenia had wished for succession from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, in which Yugoslavia responded with militaril action. Slovenia responded with its own, being made of 45, 200 armed personal. To run the numbers, with Slovenia's population being 1,913,355 in 1991, this concludes 2.36% of Slovenia's population participated in this war, a war that would kickstart the fall and separation of the whole Socialist Federation.

+Russian Civil War
In it, 2,400,000 White Russians and 3,000,000 Red Russians had fought for power over the Russian Empire's fate. The Population of Russia being at the time was 184.6 million in 1917, this means at the time, 2.3% of the population fought in the Civil War leading the rise of Soviet Union.

So, giving that in these three (3) scenarios, you have an uprising and or revolution of between 2-7% of the population, would it be safe to say that even a small minority of the population feeling tension, in any significant way, is possibly dangerous to that society's wellbeing, rather the outcome of said revolution is complete regime change or escalation of tension?