Wikileaks Publishes Secret CIA Tools That Attacked Computers Inside Offices

He's already set a bad precedent, if he wants re-election he'll have to do a lot better.

Some of the best programmers have trouble naming variables or projects due to autism or the concept itself being difficult to explain in a simple word by natural language. Because programming at an advanced level is more philosophy than arithmetic. If you look at most of the complex algorithms you'll find in research papers its mostly _v1, (_f2 arg1 arg2) and _c3:m0

Not everything is a deliberate conspiracy

Sometimes important news get few replies simply because there isnt much for the overage reader to comment on.

This. I've given shit I've programmed more "accessible" names just so that other programmers who step in can grasp it when, technically, I should've titled them something more "abstract" (generalized).

Also, if you ever hear a programmer state that:
"Now you're just arguing semantics…"
… then they're probably shit. Semantics is everything when it comes to programming.

Government contracts, user.

Intelligence officers are more like used car salesmen. Or reporters.

Because the CIAniggers making decisions are 60+ year old AARP members with security clearances? Imagine your parents laying out specs for evil hacking tools.

You dense motherfucker!

Nigger, they use .NET cancer. The image by is a fucking game.

Most of the cyber team are idiotic point and click operators who couldn't even tell you what a buffer overflow is let alone actually programming. The engineering teams can't even know most of their targets. Compartmentalization is pure cancer. It's the same as the current network engineers, they are all mindless idiots who know how to operate Cisco gear with point and click, if you ask them to do it in a terminal with commands to showcase them understanding the back architecture they no look at you like you just said gibberish.

t. looking at you

What most of these leaks have proven so far is that having a physical firewall hardware like PfSense with proper configuration would have negated almost 99% of their attack methods. So how many of you have a physical hardware firewall behind your router?

That Anti heuristic software like AVG/Avast etc are actually a attack vector rather then aid in security.

You really have to wonder why these anti virus companies STILL can't detect a file encrypting itself and not seeing the maliciousness in it. It's always been reactive rather then proactive. This is why you run a self configured daemon in linux that alerts to any sys changes.

Even the simple changes to the ARP routing scheme should be so easy to alert it it's retarded they still haven't written software that fastens sys configuration.

Literal registry changes, not alerting to this amateur cancer! Fuck winshit.