How do we fix the nigger problem in America?

How do we fix the nigger problem in America?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_large_African-American_populations
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automotive_assembly_plants_in_the_United_States
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_Detroit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_General_Motors_factories
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chrysler_factories
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ford_factories
twitter.com/AnonBabble

By killing and eating all of the mostly-white capitalists who closed down the factories, of course.

...

really makes you think

are you retarded?

Crime rates increase as economic stability and prosperity decreases.

Forgot to sage my friend
Let me do it for you

...

Disingenious.

Air shot Air shot
Air shot Street level shot

This is what porky actually wants you to believe

What's so hard about understanding that shit reverts to the racial baseline of which the inhabitants are capable?

Detroit was once called "The Paris of the Midwest." That went away because the whites who created and maintained it went away (as the actual Paris will if continuing the present course).

Africans make Africas, and this is exactly what happened to Detroit. It's time to stop wondering about this stuff and fix it.

If you have africans, you'll get african-tier results.

Remember: AFRICANS MAKE AFRICAS

...

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_large_African-American_populations

Top 10 black cities. I know Detroit, Flint, and Baltimore are pretty terrible, but not sure about the rest. Miami isn't that bad from what I hear for example.

Pure facts

Do you have anything to back that up?

Jesus Christ, you fucks are deluded. Detroit didn't go to shit because the car companies left, it went to shit because of white flight after the riots in '67. It eviscerated the cities tax base destroyed tourism and business.

And why did the whites leave? Because nobody wants nigger glorious uprisings on their front lawn and raped daughters in their back alley.

Combine that with a series of corrupt and incompetent leaders (all democrats btw) and a city council only interest in doing anythimg if it lines their pockets and you get detroit.

I think you're on the wrong board fam

It went that way because it was a car manufacturing hub with high union membership. It stopped being that way because the economy fucking left the city for overseas manufacturing.

This is next level willful ignorance.

>A city's economy ceasing to fucking exist wasn't the reason why the city fell into disrepair

you're telling us GM/Ford/Chrysler made all their cars overseas, then managed to ship them all back to the states?

you're fucking retarded

Wow man, didn't know shipping was just so theoretically impossible until your brilliantly researched and well-made point. Truly enlightening!

The firms themselves may have not moved production out of country but overseas manufacturing did overtake production of automobiles. Regardless of who did it, this is what naturally happens in capitalist systems. Competition creates an incentive to close plants, employ smaller workforces and automate, which works out to everyone's net detriment in actual practice due to lowered demand and higher unemployment. This is what ruined Detroit.

I should mention that a lot of the firms' efforts in moving plants around were done with the explicit goal of fucking unions in mind.

What rock have you been living under?

sage

Easy. Gas the niggers; shoot, hang, or execute in a sporting environment, like target practice for arrows or public medical experimentation.

...

...

Isn't it kind of funny that pretty much every racist movement always says "oh no they're going to come after us and they're going to kill us" is always what they say before they kill a whole bunch of the people they hate who actually didn't pose any threat to them whatsoever?

It's like shouting "he's got a gun and he's gonna shoot me!" before murdering an unarmed child. Who would do such a thing?

shoulda protectionismed.

This same lowest rung is today being sold out to globalism. And you call them racist for seeking to protect their interests.

Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy?

when are you Übermenschen already gas the fucking niggers, kikes, or whatever groups you don't like, so that you at last stop bitching, and have no one to blame but your pathetic self?

or how about you fuck off already to rand's entrepreneur city, so that rest of the world can crumble deprived of your divine genius?

dump them all in australia

if you're going to respond to these memes make sure to put "sage" as your email ;)

And why did it collapse?

Because whites left.

And why did whites leave?

Oh that's right because niggers

You literally just admitted that making your city an area where whites don't want to live dooms it to economic failure.

Killing negros is not protecting your interests. You should kill the capitalist who steals your money.


because there were no fucking jobs thats why

Protectionism won't do shit about the falling rates of profit. All it does is give your domestic economy a bigger share of a dwindling economic base. Why the fuck do you think we have recessions in the first place? The only way to solve this problem for good is to abolish the value form altogether, although you can prolong the status quo with redistributionary methods like in previous depressions.


You're not protecting your interests. You are shilling for the very forces that are selling you out in this very moment. Whether there's black people or other minorities around or what, you're still going to have a contraction of the economy happening because of capitalism's inherent contradictions and you are still going to see plants being shut down, workers being replaced with robots and people's wages being cut, and it won't be the rich ruling class motherfuckers suffering because of it.

Look, dipshit, the question was "how do we fix the nigger problem in america?" The answer is to get rid of the problem - kill the niggers. Do it en masse, do it quickly or slowly, do it on pay-per-view, stream it on youtube, make it a game show, whatever - if there is a problem, get rid of the problem.

Idiots like you can get in the firing line, for all I care. Moron. I never said that niggers were "coming to kill us," I just answered the question. If you dont like the truthful answer to the question posed by the OP, fuck off the thread and do something else, like troll for Hillary, you fucking useless cunt.

wow edgy

There are still plenty of auto factories in he US. Why did they leave Detroit?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automotive_assembly_plants_in_the_United_States

Because the jobs went overseas you fucking dimwit

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_Detroit
Basically, in order to fuck unions and save money.

You really need to check your history of the area. I think you have your time line a bit screwed up. Jobs were still available for quite some time after the riots.

It's more like factories re-opened in the United States in right-to-work states to save on shipping costs.

Buzzwords and bullshit. I am shilling for the government to enforce that companies that wish to sell here keep their production here. Trump is saying this too. But apparently he is racist. He is trying to counter EXACTLY what was described as being the root cause of decline here . I wonder, if it was only black jobs he was trying to defend would you be so keen to dismiss it? I doubt it. You people here HATE trailer trash. By not denouncing globalisation you are supporting it.

Jesus do you idiots seriously think detroit just started going downhill in the 90's? Jobs wernt being shipped overseas in the 60's

Yeah, edgy, you stupid son of a bitch. I just got home from working a 12 hour overnight shift providing for my family and then I pop on over to Holla Forums and see this stupid thread, decide to post, and then encounter your stupid ass. Kill yourself.

Outsourcing jobs, including manufacturing, has been going on since the 70s. It merely accelerated in the '90s.

...

So are you for or against it?

It's capitalism dummy isn't an answer.

FEELS

Congratulations.

For or against what?

Yes. Many are defunct. But the ones mentioned above were GM and Ford, both of whom still have factories in other states and even some in MI. Just not Detroit.

OVER

Outsourcing of jerbs.

REALS

Against, obviously.

In what world is using foreign slave labor preferable except to Porky?

Spend five fucking minutes here m8. Nobody is in favour of globalization. It's done more to empower porky than anything else in history. We oppose Trump because he's a retarded porky, and just because he has some good anti-globalization stances doesn't make up for his other bullshit.

The riots happened in fucking 67. Jobs were on the decline since the 30s, mainly because of AUTOMATION.


I am saying that protectionism is not the fucking problem. How does protectionism stop automation? One of the biggest causes for the loss of jobs over the past 80 years has been the rise of automation, and the fact that only a select few people benefit from productivity increases due to automation. Less working people getting money means less working people spending money means less profits, which means closing plants and layoffs. This causes a situation where all the rich people who benefited from automation are afraid to spend their giant piles of cash, because they only spend it into things that make a profit and nothing is making a profit, so jobs decline and the situation spirals out of control. This is why recessions happen. Protectionism does JACK SHIT to address this.

Trump isn't selling any solution. He's selling a patchwork job that won't do shit, and he doesn't actually have any idea what he's talking about because he's an opportunist without ideals of his own. He's pandering to lizard-brain me good they bad retardation. Now, I don't think any other establishment candidate is good, and Hillary is arguably worse, but if you think you can solve this fundamental problem of capitalism by voting in an election then you are fundamentally fucking deluded.

Pic related is more relevant everytime I look at it.

*is not the fucking solution

...

Good. So presumably you support the protectionist candidate?

Compared to the alternative it absolutely does.

and that's is why you are a retard.
if companies could return to us, they alredy would have done it.
some plants were reopened, when it became cost effective

you need to understand dipshit, capitalist competition is a race to the bottom.
no one in their right mind would pay your ass 10 bucks per hour when he can pay 2 bucks some mexican subhuman

if some populist politician will make an attempt to restrict capital freedom, you will see flight of the said capital with the speed of light

also
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_General_Motors_factories
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chrysler_factories
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ford_factories

ctrl+f united states

stay delusional

The problem is that they can't compete with foreign automobile manufacturers, dum dum. That's how capitalism works.

Also

True but the prevailing neo-liberal attitude behind outsourcing and offshoring is having an effect too. The revolution won't happen over night. So is it not worth doing what you can in the immediate term to mitigate what we can?


See above. Google 'pragmatism'.

M8 for us that alternative is to tear up the whole system. Nobody here likes Clinton either, in fact some people have said they will vote for Trump because they hate her so much. But I think that if it were a viable option anybody here would rather send the lot of them to the guillotine than keep this sham of a system intact.

No.

Neoliberal protectionism won't do shit, and in all likelihood will only make things worse. They should have stopped globalization 40 years ago when it was starting. Now Pandora's Box has already been opened. The only way to reverse the current trend is with socialism, and that isn't even remotely on Trump's mind.

...

refer to
to quote just two lines from that link:
"After the riots, thousands of small businesses closed permanently or relocated to safer neighborhoods, and the affected district lay in ruins for decades."

"Economist Edward L. Glaeser believes the riots were a symptom of the city's already downward trajectory:

"While the 1967 riots are seen as a turning point in the city’s fortunes, Detroit’s decline began in the 1950s, during which the city lost almost a tenth of its population. Powerful historical forces buffeted Detroit’s single-industry economy, and Detroit’s federally supported comeback strategies did little to help.""

I'm sorry, we will try to consider the effects our words might have on peoples emotions the next time we express an opinion on something.

Then so be it. Surely this helps your cause?

maybe you missed this bit?

I want to see Trump win just so I can watch the dawning horror and revelation as Trump signs the TPP live on C-span.

Stupid classcuked lumpen.

With Trumps railing against NAFTA this seems unlikely. Maybe a 30% chance. Clinton is a 95% chance.

Does not compute.

I'm not some leftcom who insists on ideological purity, and I understand why someone (rightfully) concerned about jobs might vote for Trump, but selling him as a magical cure-all to the world's economic problems and blaming every social ill on foreigners and minorities is the absolute height of retardation. That's the sort of thing I'm talking against.

It's not on anyone's mind, even the Socialist candidate if this place is to be believed. So why not try to fight it with the means available?

No I don't. I think those blinded by hatred for Trump cannot see that she is the greater evil.

They're both the same. The fact that trump has one good policy doesnt automatically make him better. They are equally shit.

Right, so not the jobs but the riots were the fatal blow. Pretty sure that was the premise put forward above.

Because most of us have reached the conclusions that elections don't do shit. They're just a big spectacle without any power to fix what's wrong with the system. If I were a burger, I'd probably vote for Trump just to spite the political establishment, but if you want to see real change you need to understand that the currently existing political system is corrupt to the fucking core and probably can't be salvaged. I would, however, be in favour of electing reformist candidates with reasonable demands just so they can try their best and fail so everyone can understand that reforms are gay ass bullshit and the only way we can get shit done is with a revolutionary change in the status quo.

Well Clinton and her DNC cronies torpedoed that too.

Hence why the system is a piece of shit!

you don't understand

historically protectionism was implemented by nation states to protect underdeveloped national industry from foreign competition
the so-called infant idustry protection

as List argued, free trade benefits already industrialized countries, while protectionism benefits underdeveloped countries

so there's no rational incentive for a bourgeous politician in the US to implement protectionism
US corporations are the ones who benefit the most from free trade

14/88 to you too my brother.

You don't think I'm arguing in favour of the current system? I'm arguing for doing what little can be done to make things less shitty and that it is a kick in the teeth for the proponents of the current system (neo-liberalism) is a bonus.

well that's bullshit. The elite that own shit in the US and China benefit, the average worker in the US or Europe sure as hell doesn't.


Trump is not a rational player.


At the expense of workers in the east and west.

I'm not trying to appropriate leftist rhetoric but fuck if there is chance at doing something that will help then I cannot understand why this place opposes it.

great photoshop skills

have you (as an unbiased guy) ever been in rwanda?

Even with the assumption that Trump is being sincere and not only saying what his voters want to hear, the moment he implements his policies, the porkys will threaten him with destroying the american economy.

He could try to keep America afloat but without porkys aid, I don't see any scenario where he doesn't depend of Hugo Chavez policies. If he has te balls to go through it, I might even call him comrade.

so we should vote for hillary instead?

Pretty much this.

No one thinks that would be a good idea.

Why are people in this thread pretending Trump's proposals are in any way left-leaning? He opposes free trade agreements but those are from the only problem we have. He has no proper plan to bring back jobs, and furthermore he wants to give porky even more tax cuts.

...