Source: dailystormer.com
WE NEED YOUR HELP
Please see other ways to donate at the Daily Stormer
w w w.wesearchr.com/bounties/daily-stormer-vs-splc-legal-defense-fund
Tanya Gersh was making statements against Sherry Spencer in the media to further this campaign, making her a public political activist legally subject to criticism from the public.
Thus in response this website's editor Andrew Anglin invited his readers to make legal, non-threatening critiques of Tanya Gersh's politically motivated extortion scheme:
Tanya Gersh is now suing Andrew Anglin with the Southern Poverty Law Center for hundreds of thousands of dollars for daring to invite the public to comment on her despicable extortion scheme.
If Anglin doesn't get money for a legal defense, The Daily Stormer will disappear. Unfortunately, lawyers from an arbitrary jurisdiction can't appear pro hac vice without appearance of a local counsel per the rules of Montana District Court, so we have to come up with a king's ransom for Anglin to fight a federal civil case.
Stormer needs a six figure sum to survive.
This matters to everyone on the Internet
Gersh v. Anglin is a flagrant violation of the rights of the whole Internet to criticize public figures
Tanya Gersh attempted to extort Sherry Spencer out of a building, and yet she gets to play the victim and try to silence her critics? In the complaint Tanya Gersh makes risible lies about how she was simply just trying to help Sherry Spencer after making public condemnations of her building funding racism in the press.
If this is not fought, a major alt-right press outlet will die and history will record Gersh's wicked lies of just being a helpful realtor trying to faithfully assist Sherry Spencer, instead of the truth of her being a contemptible manipulator trying to steal from the mother of a man she would see silenced. Constitutional scholars unaware of the lies of Tanya Gersh are already noting the Constitutional problems with the case:
The biggest problem for the Southern Poverty Law Center is that the worst comments are not made by Anglin himself, the defendant, but by third parties, Banville said. Legally, under the Communications Decency Act of 1996, anyone who publishes online isn't responsible for comments generated by others.
Beyond that, the complaint doesn't even establish that authentic Stormers are even responsible for any of the threatening language Gersh took issue with. Just last month, ADL's Director Oren Segal was attempting to pin the blame on a contributor to The Daily Stormer for a series of bomb threats to Jewish Community Centers. The FBI later discovered that these bomb threats were made by an Israeli national. We all know who is really responsible for violent anti-Semitic threats all around the world. It is the same people every time. Gersh's own people forged any and all threats to her.
This case will be blown open so hard when Tanya Gersh's lies are revealed in a court of law.
This is the last stand of the alt-right. Democratic process has failed us, and only our memes remain. Do not let the meme wells die by the perfidy and lies of the wicked. The indictment has loads of issues. If this is fought hard and well, Anglin will win and Gersh will be forced to pay out all the cash for the legal fees. Let us fight together now to see Gersh crushed and a lien put on her house. Gersh should be made to lose her home, just as she tried in wickedness to force Sherry Spencer's loss of hers, and now the Stormer's loss of his.
Don't let the SPLC outspend the lulz