Can someone please explain how Juche is any different in theory and/or practice from left-wing Zionism...

I can't even begin to formulate a proper reply to such a retarded post.

I'm just gonna go ahead and invite myself over for a laugh riot and ask you how you came to that very interesting conclusion.

- ethno-nationalism
- a big Other (as infiltrator and ruiner of the stolen homogenous paradigmâ„¢)
- romanticization of historical aesthetics and military might

Check out Umberto Eco's 1995 article "Ur-Fascism".

nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/

So in dum-dum talk,

Xenophobia
A unifying enemy
military fetishisation?

??

I don't think you can dum dum down 'ethno-nationalism' very much (maybe 'folk-racial fetishism'), and xenophobia is also more like that which forms the motivation /for/ ethno-nationalism instead of being synonymous with it.

Military /plus/ history fetishization, to be more precise.

It's unfair to accuse them of "military fetishisation" when the United States has all but openly declared it's intention to curb stomp the DPRK if it thinks it can win.

Ultranationalism, authoritarianism, anti-communism and militarism. If it has all these things then it's fascist. Racism and religion are optional. For example German fascism had a strong emphasis on racial hierarchy, whereas others did not (for example Mussolini didn't distinguish between Jews and non-Jews as long as you were Italian). Spanish fascism had strong religious elements, whereas others were secular, etc.