Battlefeel 1

Can we have an honest conversation about this? No shilling or anti-shilling or general shitposting.
Yes we know Ea is bad, yes Dice are cucks, yes WEEWOZ KANGS:the vidya, yes this isnt authentic ww1.
With that out of the way lets talk how can this be salvaged if at all

Over 45 min of raw gameplay footage. Including vehicles, infantry, destruction, etc

Tanks are slower and are more balanced with regards to infantry. No more of those moments where you are pinned by a tank with no way to even disable the treads.

Planes will fly shittier if you clip the wings and hopefully this will be the first Bf game where Air superiority doesnt exist anymore because fuck Jets and Attack-Choppers raping entire servers

Weapons are more specialized now. No more AR/medic spam.
Lower TTK because of:
Lower accuracy on weapons due to new mechanics of bullet drag(wind gravity etc) as well as recoil.
Lower RoF
Revamped damage profiles to the one more similar to Bad Company 2
Lots of Forgotten weapons, not realistic but fuck it what other gun can you use a Winchester 1895 or a Mondragon?

Melle plays a bigger role due to lower TTK and smaller mags /longer reloads on weapons

Judging from the info so far its on par with BC2. All buildings are collapsible, terrain deforms from tank shells or zeppelin wreckage.

Gas the Bikes race war now, remove Kebaps, Cut the Burrito

Fukken Sold!

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/uv9yo
archive.is/6crKZ
archive.is/Ndxox
store.steampowered.com/app/242860/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_African_Americans#World_War_I
miniaturemarket.com/table-top-miniatures/wings-of-war/world-war-i.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I don't know man. A WW1 game without the Frech is like a WW2 game without nazis.

Not from around here, are you?

Supervisor won't let you say that, huh?

Couldn't think of an alternative to mudslime or dune coon, huh?

Shilling.

I've never seen such blatant shilling. This is not the place for you.

Fucking emberassing

There is no winning with shitposters liek you. If I would have kikes,mudslimes,niggers you would reply with back to Holla Forums

Face it there is no version of this thread that you wouldn't come in and shit up. So either make a sticky of groupthink approved topics topics or fuck off and let people post

If you're going to shill, I'm going to call it out.

Just don't do it. Just for once in your life don't be a cuck. This could be the easiest time in your life to grow a spine and have principles. Do you think you'll care that you didn't play this garbage in 2 years? You'll find something else to waste your limited time and money on. You'd be happy if you were given 50 bucks for free right? well congrats

You have literally no fucking proof beyond your paranoid raving because you already commuted to the idea that any discussed that you disprove of is shilling.
Drink your own medicine, grow a pair and admit that you came to shit up the thread regardless of content.

But you know what fine. Shit up the thread bully any dissent, shrieak SHILL like a fucking mimsy to your heart's content. We both know come october there will be cyclic thread for this like Overwatch

Fucking A dubs dont lie

...

...

While freedom of speech is an important tool for these boards, there is such a thing as board culture. I would not go on /k/ and spam CLIPS CLIPS CLIPS or /m/ and talk about the latest releases of Katy Perry. EA games, for example, on Holla Forums falls under this concept.

EA have destroyed plenty of titles and studios, but let us take the most recent example of their utter shitness. Battlefield Hardline & Titanfall. Both of these games did not even manage to get off the ground [1]. Star Wars Battlefront (2015) is already on sale on Origin for $20 and is loosing players faster than Evolve did [2].

While some games can have redeeming qualities, EA Games post 2004-2006 is regarded as absolute trash around these boards. Continuing to support a publisher this bad is not only bad for you, but bad for all of the community as they will keep releasing more trash.

Not to mention currently as the industry is designed around HYPE and PRE-ORDERS, talking about video games that aren't released can be considered in poor tastes. Again, the only reason why Star Wars Battlefront (2015) was a success, financially, was because of pre-orders [3] .

We can talk about the game post release (and preferably with magnet link to cracked game), where we can then talk about how well the game was designed and/or produced. But considering it is EA and DICE, I would not hold my breath.

FUCK OFF SHILL

[1]
>archive.is/uv9yo
[2]
>archive.is/6crKZ
[3]
>archive.is/Ndxox

k boy
This game is a colossal intellectual failure that will be hidden under its financial success.
DICE wanted to make BF4 with LESS things.
WWI is just an excuse for low standards just like Hardline.
The game already looks WWII, they could go for steam/dieselpunk setting but this would require creativity that lacks in most EA minions.
It will be abandoned like Hardline and Battlefront because of low amount of content.

As you see I'm not even talking about gross historical inaccuracies when critiquing BF1.

This ain't no beach for you to be here

wew lad
It's fucking BATTLEFIELD, it's on the same tier as Cock of Duty. It's the same brand of yearly garbage.

Just as I fucking predicted. Everyone will be running around with semi-auto rifles and SMGs.

The design decisions like the abundance of automatic or even semi-auto firearms is something the community is willing to accept for game-play reasons and even tanks and aircraft being highly responsive.

I however draw the line at black German soldiers fighting in Europe and the over representation of groups that made up a percent of a percent of the total combatants of the war. It's fucking disrespectful of Dice


Suck my dick EA

Nigger what the fuck are you doing?

You cant is all seriousness imply that Bad Company 2 a bad game? It is arguably the last decent BF title we had.


Bf4 with less things is a fucking good idea. Bf4 is fucking bloated with superficial gimmicky bullshit mallninja weapon addons and redundant weapons, OP as fuck vehicles and lelvolution.

I've been waiting 6 fucking years for that lighting that was Bc2 to strike twice.

...

And yet they are doing exact same thing in here. Except it is even less realistic.


No, shut up. If you can make a fun WW1 game without making it a reskin of BF4, don't make it at all. I don't mind rare weapons, but only if they are, you know, RARE. But judging from the gameplay video, everyone can get SMG and Germans can use fucking shotguns (something that they were trying to ban in real life).

It looks like a Battlefield 4 mod. I don't know why Dice shat on Call of Duty when much of the new Call of Duty has better graphics.

I assume this comes as a surprise to you but there is such a thing as cracked multiplayer servers. It is a huge thing with Valve games, TF, CS, L4D, etc. Star Wars Battlefront 2 is still being played today due to community servers allowing cracked games to play.

And yes, playing Single Player is a valid choice as well. If you believe Multiplayer to be everything, then why not play a game that has actual players, like Battlefield 3 or 4. Unlike, the 3 titles I listed in my post that you glossed over.

Are you really going to look past all the things I linked you too? The extreme loss of player base, the constant yearly releases (hell one might say Star Wars Battlefront was just a theme change, same old engine and thus EA had 2 battlefronts in 1 year) and poor quality support post release of their games.

Titanfall 2 is coming out next year. While players are still playing the original wondering if they just wasted $60 on a game that EA is not even acknowledging anymore.

Do not deflect like that or I shall call you a shill a second time.

OP, you've set a new record in cock-guzzling faggotry. High five, homie.

...

There is nothing to talk about, reminder that the main objective of shills is to generate talk about the game, regardless if positive or negative.

WE WUZ DOUBLES N SHEEIT

absolutely disgusting


They have that already on steam,

store.steampowered.com/app/242860/

It's a modern BF game, with a world war 2 skin, and they're calling it a world war 1 game.
The only good part about this game is that EA got a bunch of celebrities, probably at gunpoint and we got to see them suffer while playing.

I dont care about your shitty politics. I dont care about what EA, Valve, Activision or your any other publishers do with their business practices to wrinkle your sprinkles. I care if I have fun with the final product and got my moneys worth. I dont especially care about tangentially related issues that you are so fucking adamant in talking about.If you have such a bad case of buyers remorse then its your fucking problem. I didnt buy hardline or battlefront or titanfall or dragonage and give no shits about people who did.

I dont care how many gook kids die making my nikes or how inhumane the conditions of those chickens are that I eat for lunch.
If you are one of those bleeding heart liberals that cries over how capitalism ruins everything then fuck off to the socialist paradise of Your-rope.

You deserve to drown in shit

it sure shows how much you don't care when you're desperate to convince other people

I want to talk about the fucking game but no you fuckers want to steer the conversation about EA and muh gaming industry.
It also fucking rich coming from you shrieking shills when for months ahead we had countdown to E3 literal shilling but nary a fucking complaint.

999% of the web is sucking this thing's dick. Just go there. Otherwise your intentions are pretty obvious.

...

If they want to use lots of automatic or semi-auto firearms and tanks then they should just make a fucking WWII game, I enjoyed WWII games and it's been long enough that i'd enjoy the setting again instead of the same rehashed modern warfare plot. They didn't make a WWII game though, they made a WWI game and then proceeded to shit all over it and not even attempt to make it feel like WWI.


It was shit and the game that made me stop caring about Battlefield or Dice. The latest Call of duties they released were even worse but that doesn't stop BC2 from being the shit that started it.
I'd love to have a good thread actually discussing a world war 1 game but there is nothing to discuss here because the game EA is releasing is complete shit with little to no redeeming qualities and no effort or passion put into it to try and make a WWI or good game.

Of course everyboyd is going to call you a shill when you try and seriously talk about Battlefield 1 like it's going to be anything other than complete shit. It would be like making a thread about EAs Battlefraud and then trying to have a serious discussion about how it continued on from and evolved the Battlefront formula. Adding "Let's just talk about it's good points, no shilling or anti shilling ;)" doesn't stop it from looking exactly like shilling, especially when there are no good points to actually discuss anyway.

Just look at this post
Guy is either a complete retard or a bad shill. They always crack and double down

All this hate for a guy trying to discuss the merits of a video game without identity politics or brand loyalty bullshit. Shouldn't you gays be in the Overwatch sticky telling those kids off for liking a game you don't like?


You're a shill, but deterioration of the conversation comes from shills like you and autists who can't resist shitposting in a thread that has even the slightest hint of shillery in it. As though having an honest-to-god discussion should take a back-seat to directionless rage and indignation of masses who are just as brainless and idiotic as the consumer sheep they deride.

Maybe you're too new to have noticed but we do discuss the merits of games that have merits. We even discuss Kickstarter games or games in Early Access if they have enough merits to warrant discussion.

What merits does BF1 have? What makes it not BF4 with a WW1 skin? What have they improved since the days of BF 1942 apart from the destruction? The only thing that comes to mind is the addition of (extremely simplistic) component damage to vehicles now, something most games have had for ages.

On the other hand, just look through the thread to find the numerous drawbacks this has. There's nothing to discuss, if you want BF1 discussions go dig up BF3/4 discussions, replace the names and terms to be pertinent to WW1, and there you go, because they're the same damn game. On top of all the shit, it's also being used to push Marxist propaganda, which just multiplies the shit.

I'm also offended you didn't check my double dubs.

Why not make it WWII then?
It had its load of automatics and agile but not jet planes.

It makes it simply retarded when they just reskin MP9 into MP18 and M16 into BAR.

The thing is, this is basically saying "I want WW1 but I don't want WW1". If you just put a WW1 skin on BF4, it's not WW1 the same way if I put on girl clothes I'm not a girl.

shh don't give them any ideas

How do you even expect to have fun with Battlefield after BF4 fucked up launch,one year of trying to fix, BFH dead on the arrival, Battlefront completely abandoned after 4 month.Without considering all the problem related to the Frostbite engine which sucks for multiplayer games,the cancer community,the hideous shit detection which favor Pajeet with his 3000 ping or the server admin,the total lack of teamplay and the highest amount of historical inexactness i ever saw in a game?
EA should have just copied Verdun and remade it with the budget that only them have.It's a fucking pleasure assaulting the enemy's trench with the artillery dropping,hoping you will do it They could have added the African front for the niggers and some early days of war scenery and maps for the big ass assault and open warfare battles.

There are threads about BF2142 and 1942 on this board with active players.I think you will get more fun with them.


Why in the name of God you fags have to leave out the fact that Blizzard is a cancer?Isn't the fact that Blizzard was actively pushing and donating to a con-artist in shaming at least the 80% of the people who filled their wallet enough to consider,no matter how fun their new game can be,to not finance their campaign?
And the shit with Diablo 3?

It's like liberals campaigning for the end of Multinationals while they eat a McDonald.Who is this fucking stupid?


Are you at least a cute girl?

...

fuck i don't even mind black soldiers,since we know that askaris served with the german empire,and that the french employed many moroccan and libyan soldiers but strong independent womyn for the sake of diversity is retarded

What the fuck?

okay,dark skinned

Yeah
In colonies of Africa, not Europe.

Do you not feel a pang of cognitive dissonance with that assessment? It a fucking medieval witch hunt logic of damned if you do, damned if you dont.
There is no fucking reasoning with your kafka trap

...

Ok so:


AYO HOL UP
SO YOUZ BE SAIYIN
WE WUZ SHILLZ N SHEEEIT

Top kek

Okay you want this shilling meme to be real? Fine lezzdoozis. Lets have Bf1 thread every fucking day, starting today. I aint got shit to loose now

...

See you tomorrow.

...

Yep, that's a shill.

I guarantee you, you are having more fun shitposting here than you will ever have playing this half assed game.

Enjoy buying the french DLC mofo.

...

No, it's to encourage other potential buyers. If the game is already seeing huge marketing and presence on all sites for discussion, then positive voices already dominate all discussion. By simply not having any negative voices in this scenario, you just let the shills win.

Of course if a game/product has no attention on it at all, pretending to shit on it can be used to drum up attention for it isn't that right Fem Freq?. But this is not that sort of game.

when is the game coming out? i dont want to miss the shilling that day in Holla Forums

Oct 31 i think

Hold the fuck up, the enemies have colored markers above their fucking heads?

...

No idea about this game but those could just be spotted enemies. Like in the previous BF games

That makes more sense, but it's still shitty

Made sense in modern battlefield games, WW1 setting? Not so much

That's historically justified. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_African_Americans#World_War_I


That, not so much.

Just make a fucking ww2 game

...

you know whats shitty, Germans and allies sharing the same tank and aircraft models

miniaturemarket.com/table-top-miniatures/wings-of-war/world-war-i.html

There is a huge list of aircraft that served on both sides of the war

I was trying to make the point if Cuckland wanted to showcase historically diversity why not then the Indian soldiers that fought in far greater numbers than hand full of obongos from Harlem

Its MP18 because its from 1918

Alright, I will humor you a bit shill.

Why is France not playing a bigger role in this game? France's military doctrine was the closest thing what we would later see in WW2 at the time. It would make the most sense to use them as a main faction in a "fast" light alt-history WW1 game.

Hell, why not go full over the top alt-history at this point? WW1 is the perfect setting for walking tanks.

What a huge load of shit this game is going to be.

Is pic related any good? What's the gameplay like?

I am likely to pick this up on the steam summer sale so yeah, my friend have told me it's worth it,but only when it's on sale.

Unfortunately that game isn't very good either. The gunplay is very shitty, and its pretty boring.

It has been a long time since I played this game but I remember the gameplay being more arcade like, so don't expect a Red Orchestra WW1 mod.
However they didn't go full retard like Dice and added experimental weapons no one was using.
It's actually bretty gud, I think.

Wrong type of /m/ board pally

It suffers from bugs,lags,shit hit-detection but overall it's a far better game than BF1 will ever be.It's historically accurate,full of guns and they aren't laser precise as the ones in every BF.There are multiple faction with multiple roles.

It's not much teamplay focused for what i remember since the main scope is to reach and hold the enemy trench or defend it,there is really not much open room for tactics beside decide where to use the artillery and where to use the gas.

welp at least they're finally working on all the 1941 prequels they promised when they released battlefield 1942!

they've already done battlefields 2-4, so they're, like, halfway there already!

well fuck

I hope not, otherwise it would mean the board is in bad shape.

What is war loot, after WWII and the Geneva Convention (I think I'm a little rusty on the changes to "war policy" after WWII) Along with a bunch of other stuff that was made illegal/war crimes was the looting of enemy soldiers and taking war trophies.

see this
Fuck man I didn't realize one or two black guys in a game about a historical event where there might have been one or two black guys would trigger everyone this much

Yeah that one is bullshit

Still though a in game cavalry charge would be cool as fuck, kinda like RO2: Rising Sun, with the japs.

In the end though I don't see why you guys are all complaining, Battlefield has become brodude/normalfag's game now. And I'm pretty sure they don't really give a shit about who or what is in the game as long as they get their yearly dose of shit.

Ridiculous weapon sway with no free-aim makes you wonder how the fuck to aim at someone past 10 feet.
Horrific frameloss(Dropping from 160 FPS down to single digits occasionally no matter what settings are used)
Forced retreats that kill you if you don't run back.
Bottlenecks are very easily camped and defended.
Aimbots/aim assists are still a thing.

sure, leave out an incredibly hardcore story, probably one of the most hc ones out of ww1

sure

faggot

...

Not to mention they're leaving out the French for DLC.
While any other day of the week I'd say 'fuck the frogs', they were kind of a big deal during the Great War, if not one of the biggest deals.

There is in-game aim assist?

No. Just a fancy name for aimbot that's supposedly harder to detect.

I say the same I said in the reveal thread, it's just going to be another battlefield. By the way, did you write "Battlefeel 1" on purpose?

Anyway, you notice how since bf3 they all feel the same? bf4, hardline it hardly matters what you play.

So if you like the past games you will like this one too.

I personally hate bf since bad company 2 so I wont get this one either.

The Russian Empire is also missing in the game.

Yet America, the Ottomans, Italy, and the African Theatre is in.

Since BF4 they all feel the same, which is like shit. 3 at least had good gunplay, I'd place it a lot closer to BC2 tier than 4, Hardline or the current abomination of marxist fuckery.

You and OP can both fuck off

Good. Monarcucks here in Russia should know exactly how grateful is Entente for Russian participation in WW1.

Why not just go play Battlefield 2142, for free, with Holla Forums, right now. Check the catalog you fucking dumbass shill.

How's the server pop typically?

can't speak for all of us, but I hate all of you. Like seriously, half of you idiots are just a bunch of kiddies that pretend to be older. Like every time I go into a arena shooter thread nobody can say anything about ut because they didn't play the original games. And in every street fighter thread people only ever talk about sf5. Also they realized now that they got buttfucked and pretend to not own it.