Infowars interviewer asks questions to a young socialist on the streets

youtube.com/watch?v=7RSvFJqEdWk

Infowars interviewer asks questions to a young socialist on the streets.

Interviewer: What's the red star on your hat?
Socialist: It's the symbol for socialism, communism.
Interviewer: But you work for a living, though. You hold two jobs.
Socialist: Yeah. And I go to school.
Interviewer: That's very anti-socialist.

This is what these cretins actually believe.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/user/RedAgent2020
marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol01/no04/marx.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Oh boy its the video from based comrade.

He is subscribed to muke btw.

...

Every

Goddamn

Time

It's nice to have individuals on the left that are able to have a civic discussion even when approached by a condescending infowars reporter

that guy is pretty good.

Is he? How do you know?

His channel.

I didnt realise based comrade had a yt channel, has it got any content?

I found that the infowars guy toned his usual game down a bit when confronted with such civics, which I thought was nice

Nah
youtube.com/user/RedAgent2020

Do people actually believe this?

Sooo, you have to have a lengthy period of heavy exploitation of the workers before you can seize the means of production. The workers can't build factories? If socialism can't facilitate the change from agrarian to industrial society why could socialism facilitate future changes?

This seems like a conclusion you can only draw by reading Marx like a demagogue. Correct me someone if I'm wrong

Recognizes infowars interviewer, pro-gun, "scientific socialism", definitely autistic enough to be one of us. I'm glad faith cut him of before he could say that he supports North-Korean anti imperialism and thinks Duterte is a good boy.
But he did a great job, and infowars where good to put up the video. I'm betting a lot of the libertarians could be good comrades if they knew what we actually want.

I think it's more that capitalism was a logical step after feudalism given the historical circumstances and material conditions present in Western Europe. It was more unavoidable than necessary. Marx actually denied that he implied it was necessary in response to a Russian critic.

marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol01/no04/marx.htm

historical materialism lmao

This.

We're not so different, you and I

kek
he's truly a Holla Forums

Does this guy post here?

the argument is that you can't conceive of socialism before the concept of wage labor and capitalism even exist
you couldn't have had a slave economy like rome's without first being able to conceive of large settling populations and agriculture either

dank

This guy is based as fuck, tbh.

This guy keeps me wanna live.

This guy is not a shill.

...

...