Battlefield 1 doesn't have female soldiers because 'boys wouldn't find it believable'

But my history teacher Mr. Steinberg says you are wrong!

You people are looking at this from the wrong perpective.

If the nogs are in the game that means we can finally Gas the Bikes and Race War NO!!!

Inb4 b-but it's true because Soviet archives say so. They also said they lost 20 000 men fighting Finland, and that they had Hitler's skeleton.

Here's a question, how is Battlefield even remotely WW1

Lots of the weapons, tanks and vehicles act like they've been made today. Blimps in particular feel like they turn on a dime and tanks shouldn't even be moving this fast.

Why even say it's a WW1 game when it's not?

Because they wanted to be 'different' and their form of different is just putting a coat of paint over previous shit. I mean hell I wouldn't have minded if they did WW2 again or even did some type of black ops hidden war during the 60s or 80s.

The problem I have with these games is what they're presenting to the generation. Because we'll have a bunch of stupid kids who will think WWI is like this. WWI was fucking horrifying and already Verdun is kicking ass as an FPS for it and that game is mostly just half finished. I watched the gameplay for BF1 and I wondered what the fuck was going on in it. Player was running around by himself with no squad, gunning people down with a bolt action rifle that had a scope on it then bayonet rushing people. Using the fucking MP-18 and hip firing a freakin' lewis gun. Don't even get me started how we're probably going to see some type of red dot sight or some shit on these guns next.

I swear to god they put their imagination in the wrong places these days. The user earlier who said an idea about cheetahmen with plasma rifles, I'd like to see that over the shit we get fed now.

It really begs the point if you're going to do a "unique take" on WWI like what was said in E3, why not just go full crazy? Have battles take place on giant blimps, have super complex trench and undergroup maps, just do something that isn't so stupidly lazy.

new buzzwords for blacked and revised ?

There is literally nothing that could resemble WW1 in BF1.
They should have taken Verdun and Red Orchestra approach and use the millions they have to improve the idea behind them instead of reskinning BF4 with different model and guns.

Because that requires effort user. They could have easily given this some type of spin. Like maybe there was somehow a tech boom near the time WW1 started and it allowed for some advancements in weaponry and tanks. Alot of media has done this.

But you want to know why they probably didn't do it? Because the normalfag/casual audience hate imagination in gaming. Fucking seriously, if something seems too outlandish to them they don't want to touch it.

/thread
this game looks exactly like every other Battlefield game post-Bad Company