Who is more reactionary?
Who is more reactionary?
Other urls found in this thread:
Obama
as an individual Putin but circumstances make his views a little less dangerous than Obama's liberal centrism
Both parties repress leftist movements within their own country but support leftist movements abroad for political expediency
Putin is weird because he embraces every aspect of Russia's Soviet heritage except the socialism
Which isn't exactly surprising given Russia was at the peak of its power and influence during the Soviet era.
kek. What is the CPRF? The thought barrier towards socialist theories is almost non-existent in Russia, even in Russian conservatism/nationalism. It's just the autistic burgerland that treats everything that could be remotely socialist as some sort of asscancer.>>969194
Pick one.
Reminder CPRF is one of the many controlled opposition parties sanctioned by the Putin regime and it is itself /literally/ Dengist (AKA neoliberal capitalism with autocratic characteristics) as well as actually reactionary.
Looking at your flag I can tell that's the kind of 'leftism' you'd like though, kek.
They said in a release that if the Soviet Union went a similar way as China, it could have survived. That except gets postet all over leftypol out context to prove that the CPRF is a monolithic Dengist block. It's a big party with lots of streams and definitely more communist then the so called "socialist" (read: SocDem) parties of the west.
Russia nationalism/conservatism is open-minded towards communism, even though it may deny it's internationalist aspects (and the SJW madness for sure).
Let's put it this way, for once Putin is not the bad guy.
I would unironically say Putin, but what is scarier is that no one knows what's going inside his head.
I think America and the West has underestimated him, and are still underestimating him. Deriding him as a "regional power" like Obama did is not taking into account the scope of things.
I dislike Obama as much as the next guy, but at least he's not bent on building a political system based on personal power like Putin has done. Russians can do so much better than him.
Truthfully they usually vote differently than Pootin's party in Duma.
What? The US at best manipulates such movements against themselves in order to install new puppets that are then equally or more horrible for those movements.
I advise anyone who doesn't say Putin to watch his TV channels or read his ideologue Alexander Dugin.
This is Thule society tier batshit reaction.
Wasn't he just a fringe far-right "philosopher" a decade ago?
He's now a popular pundit and Kremlin favorite. He's there to give a philosophical justification to whatever shit Putin might pull.
I've heard that most of the supposed influence Dugin has on Putin is exaggerated by Dugin himself
You guys actually read Dugin or anything Fourth Theory related or just spouting memes?
I actually did, it's a mix of David Icke, Julius Evola and a gopnik.
Only a little bit, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if he's attempting to aggrandise by positioning himself as a major influence on Putin.
...
he quit the nbp for eurasianists
He used to be an advisor in putin's early days. iirc they threw him out after he "wrote" an actual goebbels speech which indeed was delivered by putin. he and limonov both started out as pomo trolls. however, while limonov stuck to contrarianism and bizarro meme-craft, dugin started to provide his amusingly heterodox explanations for foreign and domestic policy in earnest now; that is: he would be drawing from Eurasianists, Slavophiles and the Konservative Revolution peops instead of outright Nazis and trolling-tier theories (roerich, helena blavatsky, roza mira, tsiolkovsky, nikolai fyodorov et al). Pic related: the bolshevik he was aping just like limonov was aping trotsky. When they started out the point was to prove you can deliver any bullshit with same countenance and same pragmatic implications as the marxian talk of the Soviet leadership. Can criticism like that be applied to American leaders? My impression is no. The beliefs of their policy-makers remain all well out of the public view, in magazines such as the "foreign policy".
Do ultras ever examine the world besides just condemning everyone for not being a useless ultra parasite ?
Can you explain a bit more on that point?
Wait, you think ultralefts are the only people that condemn this shit?
Pretty much every marxist tendency in existence hates it.
wew
hmmmm
People who later became NSK in Slovenia and people who later became NBP in Russia would be aping their local conservative discurse from an inacceptable POV
jej.
Marx would literally beat the shit out of you
Marx would literally beat the shit out of you
lol
...