Hi, newfag here. I'm learn about your views since you seem to me like relatively reasonable people (no crazy SJWs). Tell me about your views generally. And, if you don't mind, answer the following questions:
What do you think about George Soros?
What do you think about libertarians?
Tell me. Honestly
David Kelly
Other urls found in this thread:
newstatesman.com
cambridge.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Levi Cox
anarcho-socialist
A liberal porky we could do without.
Horribly mislead.
Jason Thomas
What the fuck is with all the newfag threads lately jfc
Doesn't exist. All anarchists are socialists.
Aiden Watson
Thanks. How does anarcho socialism work, if there is anarchy wich is maybe contrary to the obligation of everyone helping each other? (Honest question, i don't semantically comprehend)
Lucas Lewis
I can tell you about me so far. I want to see both sides (Capitalist//Socialist, Fascist//Anarchist, Technocrat//Primitivist, etc.) to learn the truth.
Josiah Perry
It's a good thing dumb nihilist dick.
Landon Howard
I don't care about individuals. I care about class politics.
Idiots.
James Phillips
Porky using liberal identity politics to his advantage
People who deadly afraid of public tyranny while exulting private tyranny. The rise of ancaps have made me appreciate them more though.
For myself I'm happy to just call myself a Socialist.
Carson Jenkins
lel no
Kevin Gutierrez
Um.
We're lead by an upper class, that owns most things in the world - and we all live in capitalist societies, where wealth is concentrated, services and goods dispersed via the market, money is the price of entry. Money is dispensed to workers while they're being exploited, given less than what they produce, the owners of society siphon off a profit from everyone, as they make everything in society into a market and currency transaction.
There's no 'two sides' here. It's the ruled, vs the rulers.
Capitalist / Socialist is the minority of owners vs the majority of renters on the land, essentially. Fascist / Anarchist is people buying into the diversions of the capitalist elite - from their own system, and blaming the system failures on identity related issues / People who see the system itself. Technocrat / Primitivist is a false dichotomy. Technocrat usually appealing to the idea or notion of how technology is used under capitalism and how it becomes applied under capitalist rule, vs "primitivists" who in many cases don't really see or understand capitalism and view all technological achievement - is it is being exploited by the capitalist system, as being inherently bad. Not just the whys and hows of its application. They also tend to fall into the very same mentality that some of the very same elites in the capitalist system do - the one where 'the solution is we need less people'.