MARK UNLEASHES RACISM

AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN MARK LATHAM GOES FULL RACIST

I could get used to more of this.


Nothing wrong with that.


He did a good job.


Calling on his followers to fight for the people, and calling a Goldman Sachs kike a waste of space. Now that's efficient tweeting.


We are, and in increasing numbers too.


They only have their HIV+ safe spaces to run to.

I don't know about you guys but I could get used to seeing more of this. Feels good to know we aren't fully cucked.

Other urls found in this thread:

9news.com.au/national/2017/04/06/14/05/mark-latham-goes-on-racist-tirade-calling-for-whites-and-straights-to-take-back-australia
archive.is/xsQfu
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_referer
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

9news.com.au/national/2017/04/06/14/05/mark-latham-goes-on-racist-tirade-calling-for-whites-and-straights-to-take-back-australia

Damn, I forgot to break the link. I apologize.

You also forgot to archive https:// archive.is/xsQfu

I'm on my shitty phone and don't have access to a PC.

9news.com.au/national/2017/04/06/14/05/mark-latham-goes-on-racist-tirade-calling-for-whites-and-straights-to-take-back-australia

archive.is/xsQfu

Break links using formatting newfriends, that way there's no need for anons to hunt for a space.
Too bad the guy is an irrelevant lol cow, he's basically Clive Palmer levels of irrelevance.

about fucking time
he needs his own platform instead of, though i appreciate the spectacle, going into the electric jew den but be effectively represented by them

now david lionhelm, that guy knows how to package and deliver his message to the public through his youtube and twitter antics.

Sorry I'm new here (inb4 lurk more) why do you guys break the link?

The easiest way would be to just press the spacebar…

Stating Truth amounts to "bizarre comments" apparently.
Kikes always try to out group any dissent.
"look, he's not conforming to narrative talking points, he MUST be mentally ill!"
I hate them so much.

clicking a hotlink sends data to the host website on where they're getting traffic from. Copying and pasting the link into the browser circumvents that. OP breaks the link to prevent newfags from clicking links willy nilly.

Theres no fucking reason to break the link. We started doing it during the primaries to stop polling sites from discounting our votes. The polling websites could tell which website you came from if you were directed there by a link. If they seen arg amounts of votes coming from a particular site they would assume fraud and could discount them.

Why we do it now is fucking beyond me. I'm assuming its fucking LARPers pretending to be oldfags who seen us doing it during the primaries. Theres really no reason to break links anymore.

I see everyone sperging out about unbroken links now so I assumed it was custom. No need to imply I'm a retard.

check'd


U WOT M8

But he's right. At least, even if you didn't agree with him, you can't call the man a coward. He says what a lot of politicians are thinking.

Websites still check where the visitors come from you nigger.
Election-voting or not they don't magically stop doing that.

We do this so newfags don't draw attention to our hatebox, we have enough shills already.

Aaaand we let the thread derail for explaining why we breal links.

Back on topic:
I don't know Mr Lathman but I hope he gets more vocal and can hold his head high against the backlash. He's 100% right and needs more exposure.

These idiots on the left pushed so hard that they can't maintain their control anymore, and now the pendulum swings back. It's like a fucking dam breaking. Things everyone has been thinking, but didn't dare to say, now all coming flooding in at once. Nation after nation will go from "free and open societies" to "the white man's land" over night.

It's beautiful.

Agreed. Back on topic now.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_referer

this actually makes me sad that I bailed on Pozzaustralia on tuesday…

For those not familiar with Australian politics, how big a deal is this guy?

(checked)

He was opposition leader (Labor party leader) during the last years of the Howard era, then did his lolly in 05 and ragequit politics, wrote a book nobody read which basically called every entrenched polly a filthy kike-fellating cunt, which of course got completely abyssed by all and sundry. He might have gotten more attention had it not been for the rise of (then) media darling Kevin "Ruddkipz" Rudd.

Jeez mark, you sure went all out this time.
Could have been a little more careful, but then again - precision was never quite his thing.

I see an old fool trying desperately to win back an audience.

He went full postal politically.
Condemned his party and pretty much everyone around him. What was odd was that he seemed so reserve before that. Then he had that passive aggressive handshake just before the election with Howard and he seemed to start to slide from there.

He seems a bit torn. Like he doesn't know what to believe.
I'm not sure if that rant is his sincere beliefs. Maybe he really is just going all out.

But he has done rants like this just to get attention before.

They are bizarre. Because I found them very unexpected.

The man usually is a little more compos- oh who am I kidding he was always a ticking time bomb. :^)

australians have always been the best shitposters

We can't count on this to happen on it's own. We need to make sure this guy gets a swell of popular support on Twatter, at the very least. Steve King was able to make the 'someone else's babies' comment and get away with it because we gave it a broad backing of support. The same thing needs to happen here.

If this gets suppressed or he gets forced to recant, it signals that this stuff is still implicitly haram, and that makes it less likely to happen organically going forward.

Should we?

He will divide people. There's no persuasive element to him.
That's why he lost the election :^)

I mean for the message. Long-term isn't really relevant, especially if he isn't going to run again.

What we need to do is demonstrate that his message will be warmly received.

He's the former leader of the Labor Party, Australia's socialist workers party. Only he's experienced cognitive dissonance because of his 'traditional values' as opposed to the Marxist agenda pushed by some of the extreme left of the party. Virulently anti-SJW. Anti Islam, or at least not afraid to call a terrorist a terrorist. Not completely anti-immigration, but pro sustainable population in a similar vein to what Dick Smith is pushing.

Ripe for a red-pilling. Not a major figure in politics, but has more media presence than most politicians. Recently lost his job on Sky News as a political commentator, after calling a group of 'feminists' at a Sydney boys school "a bunch of dickheads."

In the time it took you to click through and ban that user, you could have added the three lines of code needed so that every link on the board is broken automatically.

Faggot.

Good idea tbh. Someone get this to >>>/sudo/

No shit he was on the Dingoes three times. Did people not know about this?

Dingo ate muh baby?

I found it funny that he got booted for that and not for appearing on the Convict Report.

Is Australia still a free country or are they going to lock him up?

We have a serious problem with the fractured nature of the Australian conservative movement.

Individuals and groups that should be banding together at least for politically expedient campaigns on individual issues, are not doing so.

For an example, let's take 18C… The bullshit "racial discrimination" restrictions on free speech… Even "classical liberals" and libertarians are against making it a crime to "insult or offend", but the leftards (Labor, Greens, parts of the nu-Liberal Party) are united in their push to keep it, yet those on the "conservative" side, eg. One Nation, Cory Bernardi, David Leyonhjelm, Mark Latham, etc. are not united or organized in their opposition of it.

That's what's holding back the Australian political landscape from swinging back to the right at the moment, more than anything else.

Mark Latham is old-school Labor. What the rest of the world would consider a "classical liberal". David Leyonhjelm is a libertarian, Cory Bernardi is a conservative, One Nation is nationalist, but by and large they would all mostly agree on most issues. This is because the political landscape has swung so far leftard in this country that even libertarians and classic liberals appear "right-wing" by comparison to the completely marxist Greens and communist Labor.

He already politically suicded once at the height of his popularity and since then has had a reputation of being a loon / loose canon / laughing stock among the normies. He's walking a new and thin line in Au political commentary would be good if somebody backed him otherwise he will remain an outsider. One of the few good guys for sure.

Das real interesting. I was real appalled at the idea first because Hanson is a retard, libertarians are retarded on the general but it'd give that united group some real power if the unlikely scenario of them ever being able to work together

oy gevalt user

It's enough to italicise the colon after http(s), it's nearly invisible this way:
9news.com.au/national/2017/04/06/14/05/mark-latham-goes-on-racist-tirade-calling-for-whites-and-straights-to-take-back-australia

Because we don't want to bring normalfag attention to this humble shithole. Skim through the following thread to see what can happen if you don't break your links:
>>>Holla Forums721927

mods =/= devs

Faggot.

Maybe we could push him further right.

:^)

Thanks for the answers lads