Convince me that races are equal.
Convince me that races are equal
Luke Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
debunkingstormfags.blogspot.fr
iqcomparisonsite.com
debunkingstormfags.blogspot.fr
worldnewsdailyreport.com
en.wikipedia.org
cdc.gov
archive.is
debunkingdenialism.com
biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
asanet.org
twitter.com
Jaxson Thomas
How about I just convince you to kill yourself?
Oliver Moore
Biologically they are equal.
Socio-economically they are not.
Oliver Ward
Convince me you aren't an autistic faggot.
Aiden Barnes
I can convince you to read any modern anthropology book (although I doubt you'd read it), as it's pretty hard to compile everything on an image board and then spoonfeed you. Also, I doubt you'd really take it to heart and are worth educating if you open your thread with an artifact-riddled Holla Forums jpeg as if it's an argument or an intellectual statement.
Justin Howard
Since you like graphs and other easily digestible images, here's a few more.
Daniel Taylor
Races doesn't exist as a scientific term. At least not in taxonomy. There is no consensus of what the word even means.
Now you might argue that what you call race is the same thing as subspecies. But that's retarded. A German sheperd is not a subspieces of dog. And all dogs are the same subspecies of wolf, so by that logic, there is only one dog race.
Caleb Torres
Races don't exist, no scientists agrees with caucasian-negroid-mongoloid theories, and that's not because all scientists are secretly jews planning the destruction of europe, it's because these theories are retarded.
William Perez
We both know how it will play.
We'll post stuff supporting our respective views
You'll call our sources Jewish lies
We'll call yours pseudo science
You'll spam the thread wth infographics while we'll have more tendency to post a few links or pdfs.
In the end we'll have failed to convince you.
And you'll have failed to convince us.
But let's go anyway:
Jordan Long
Not an argument
Have you ever realized that they could be economically lower BECAUSE they are biologically inferior?
Anthropology is liberal shit I thought you guys were better than that.