The reason why feminists & SJW's are pushing the "video games must be recognized as an artform"

This guy started the domino effect on what the video game industry and us are suffering from now from the screeching complaints of social justice and feminists.

The same person who "inspired" [games] like Gone Home, Cibele, Her Story, Sunset, Life Is Strange, Heavy Rain and other cinematic "games".

Yes, him. If anything, the blame should be upon this person right here. I don't have any respect for this traditionalist. Nope, not one bit.

Other urls found in this thread:

rogerebert.com/reviews/dirty-harry-1971
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Why

are

you

writing

like

a

faggot

?

Kieron Gillen started the retard train

That may as well be a picture of you for all we know.

Underage

...

Daily reminder that Ebert was a film critic based on the "entertainment value" criteria
aka he judged movies based around the fact if a movie was worth a ticket and if you, the average movie goer, might be entertained by it

AKA HE NEVER WENT INTO THE "ART" SUBJECT IN HIS OWN FIELD

Why would anyone care about his opinions on vidya as art (which he later retracted after playing Flower)?

It's true in some ways. There are those who are desperate to validate their positions in the industry by devolving gaming into shlock that would get many a finger snap in a San Fran art festival. All these "deep" works aren't popular not because of all the AAA releases, but because people hate them just as much and see them as the creators masturbating over being smarter in some abstract way that only makes sense in their minds.

He wrote 3 long phrases, 2 related and 1 finisher
It would be bad if he wrote 5 related, short ones
Learn to identify Breddit, newfag

Why does everybody always ignore this part?

user. You're implying sjw were not implanted already.

...

Leftism is totalitarian and has been ever since its birth in the Reign of Terror, so it can't tolerate ANY aspect of society that isn't under its control.

That's the difference between authoritarianism and totalitarianism.

Authoritarians largely don't give a shit what you get up to in private as long as it's not making problems for them or society as a whole, and will generally exert control only where they believe there is some benefit to be gained. They may meddle in your private life, but only if they think doing so will help their cause in some way.

Totalitarians will control every single aspect of your life purely for the sake of control, even if there's nothing to be gained by doing so, even if it's objectively a waste of their resources and time to do, even if it actively turns you against them.

Thus the left, which is totalitarian, seeks to exert control over even harmless shit like video games, PnP RPGs, obscure corners of the internet, etc. It has nothing to gain by going after these things and is making enemies everywhere by doing so, but it can't help itself. It demands total, absolute control.

...

No he didn't. You're ignoring why he woukld be compelled to say such a thing in the first place. he didn't just pull the comment out his ass. There was a push to make video games an art form back then and he simply opposed it like many other people which is why it was not and still not seen as an art form by quite a few people. He was but one of many voices that spoke out on the issue.

Sage because OP is a silly billy.

No.
The reason "video games must be recognized as an artform" thing exist was because of gamers. Back during the dark days of the likes of Jack Thompson and Joe Lieberman gamers pushed for games to be considered art as a hedge against censorship. And not just the "soft to firm" type of censorship we're dealing with today but actual, honest-to-God government censorship. I remember that there was even one judge that made a ruling that gameplay couldn't be considered art because it was distinct from the story and plot of the game.

What we as gamers didn't realize was that we were attracting a bunch of various "hangers on" to gaming that would eventually metastasize into what we know as SJWs once Thompson and the others were defeated.

In all likely hood we'll repeat the process as well. Once the SJWs are defeated we'll realize that some of our allies drawn in by one or more of our current "game defense methods" will want to censor or control gaming in their own ways and for their own purposes. History is cyclical like that.

Hey, moron, video games are already legally recognized as art.

because he is OP?

When the industry opposed strict (and i mean strict) control on games being sold to minors, the gov then said games should be censored to a point it was healthy to kids
Jack Thompson's stance was that in the end, but he (and everyone) started as a guy who wanted ID and stuff to buy stuff, like buying porno. He also claimed if this was not controlled the industry would exploit the trend that kids actually want the edgy stuff over the "sane" stuff (M-rated over E and T). Guess the year he all predicted this

He actually never did this for the people, he was a greedy lawyer, but he was actually right, and today we are seeing his predictions hold true (M-rated being normal, everyone pandering to edgy kids in focus groups), and honestly we would be better with the actual M-rated being obsolete and replaced with the useless-today A-rating, the creative freedom would be higher, with actual gore mechanics

JT was right (in a wrong way), and it's not censorship when you (i mean the industry) are acting like a retard on purpose to begin with

With this kind of logic you could almost be one of them

Reminder that Ebert said Dirty Harry is Fascist.


rogerebert.com/reviews/dirty-harry-1971

I don't remember him retracting it, I only remember him giving up and quitting on the argument altogether, pulling the "I'm old and I don't care" card.

You mean the guy who only killed perverted gays (in SanFran) in a extremely quick, painless fashion, enjoyed his job and only took a school bus hostage because it was the only thing Harry cared about (he shot a supermarket before wih civilians and gambled with a dude's life)

Also Ebert said The Usual Suspects was shit because he felt cheated out of the plot (that's the whole point of the movie) and gave it a 2.5/10

A man with no good taste

The industry was already heading to slowly push the cinematic experience since early 2000s, the art thing was a byproduct of the ongoing trend to reach a closer-to-movie experience in video games. But wouldn't doubt that faggots would try to get a pice of the cake, by using this to push this faggatory hence the boom of hipsters and SJWs trying to push their retard shit and call it "ART".
Kinda funny when see that this concept started to get hamfisted harder after vidya went "mainstream" in 2007, plus after King Nigger took over and unleashed this mutated version of liberalism that enabled a fuck ton of faggots.
The Industry would still push this Art thing to cash-in.

Who do you think is actually going to read this

Videogames are an artform. Nothing to do with SJWs, they just are.

Hes a good reviewer not a perfect one. His biggest accomplishments were sharing his passion of film with America.

Everything can be art IF well-done with a masterful technique/process

Maybe nobody, hence the sage.

I read it, you fucking (1) faggot.

Art has nothing to do with quality, thats my view. People look at the word "art" as some quality qualifier, its not. Something can be art and still be terrible. Transformers is art, its also a crap film. When something is art it does not make it worth engaging with automatically.

Case in point LOL

Eat shit and die.

In his field/criteria, yes he was a very good one but he was very biased at some points

He was a retard and looked like one (literally) when he wanted to dissect why a movie was good/bad in a proper manner
His points to judge a film were nothing about passion or even film enthusiasm, he had a passion to make to you not waste 10 bucks in a shit film thus cashing a lot of newspaper gigs due to his direct consumer friendly opinions, not in recommending or talking to you about the classics, he reviewed those timeless films because they would have a major screening in a big city

Why are you so angry? Did your toys get taken away by mean old daddy?

I respect your view but i heavily disagree with it
Until someone makes a good defintion we won't move outside of the controversy
My stance is similar to the "state of the art" definition, but i haven't thought about it a lot to define it A to Z, honestly almost nobody has

Sorry, can't hear you over the sound of my filter.

The thing is that for me "art" just describes something that tries to engage with the human and or sentient experience. Its a really really low barier. Like i said Transformers is art the same way Blood Meridian is art, but one is worth engaging with and the other really isnt. So i believe when people say "this is art" , which is something with a low barrier, they really mean "this is GOOD art", something which is something with a much higher barrier.

Here's that (you)

Still can't hear you, cock sucker.

He liked Speed 2 and Mission Impossible II.

lmao

But videogames are an art form. They just aren't movies.

Holy shit, he's still trying to speak louder than my filter?

Hopefully he'll learn his lesson and contribute something to the thread next time, instead of shitting on an at least somewhat thoughtfully made post that someone took the time to write.

Oh who am I kidding. Redditors like you never fucking learn.

Those are solid fun films, nothing wrong with that.

...

...

Goddamn the autism is off the charts with you.

I can't read your posts you dumb motherfucker. Stop posting.

Come back when you have something worth saying.

Quoted my own post by accident, well doesn't that look silly?

Literal shit in a can is art.
Piss on the sidewalk is art.
Spaghetti-o's in a vagina is art.

Who fucking cares? "Art" is ruined. Artists of the past would be so fucking ashamed with the modern day "art" they would refuse to consider themselves or be called artists. My hairy anus is art, you can connect the pimples on my back and make the big dipper, thats art. My hotpocket was cold in the middle but tongue searing fucking hot on the outer edges, thats art too.

The term is fucking meaningless and you can easily judge the quality of a person by what kind of "art" they promote. I like paintings, I like sculptures, I like theater and song, but I fucking loathe A R T and artists can suck my left testicle, but not the right because that is art.

Play fucking videogames. Don't buy shit videogames. Don't buy "art", SJWs certainly don't.

Yeah, he's so wise that what he said is ALREADY KNOWN by many people for decades, even centuries.

...

Still haven't read any of your worthless shitposts. You lost your chance to say anything meaningful in this thread, and now you never will.

Oh man, i didn't want to remember that
Why are americans so degenerate, i rarely use that word but come on now

why are you a faggot

The Feminist & SJW are rejects who couldn't get a job as an intern at rag like CNN.

So they went for the next best thing to inject their ideology.

...

...

Thing is, many of the same people that vocally campaigned against Jack Thompson back in the day are now pro-censorship SJWs.

It was never really about censorship. It is, and has always been, liberals and conservatives flinging shit at each other.

I can do this all night faggot. Each reply doesn't get you any closer to being unfiltered, and I know you have nothing worth saying.

...

Just give it up. I know you desperately want your shitposts to be heard by me, because it gives you some kind of validation, but it's not going to happen.

Maybe somewhere in some other thread you'll actually contribute, and I'll actually listen. Maybe.

...

Always hated that jawless fuck.

Why aren't you?

I recall he did say there was one game that was "art" and I'm pretty sure it was some old Japanese point and click adventure.

This

He literally was the fucker writing an op-ed saying "listen, people just want to be entertained, we need more fucks like Phil Fish because the audience doesn't want to hear about people who aren't dickholes and want to actually talk about the ins and outs of game development".

Your post is worse than his.

CORRECTION
THIS FAGGOT LITERALLY TELLS EVERYONE TO TURN EVERYTHING INTO PROPAGANDA FOR SOCIALISM
(I don't have a picture of Karl Marx)
WHICH HAPPENED TO FUCK WITH FEMINISM.

Feminism is and always has been a complete cancer.

There used to be a time where video games were just silly toys. Trying to turn them into marxist propaganda makes my skin crawl.

We must fight it at every opportunity.

Suck a dick user

Oh man, I swear I knew what game you were talking about.
It was something like the lost temples of whatever. Fuck. Fuck. What was it?

Spotted the marxist.


Google says it was The Cosmology of Kyoto.

Oh, I'm thinking about a different 90's Japanese adventure game.
But I remember that one too! You're a hero, user.

hahaha

I know there are some good adventure games out there, but it does seem like the one game that Every validated publicly is probably partially responsible for out modern walking simulators pretending to be art and adventure games.

I heard Marx once said rape of all white women should be encouraged

[Citation needed]

Try and type that out again.

Really, where?

The same book he wrote on the ZOG leftshits.

Ebert* publicly validated.
Fucking autocorrect.

Cosmology of Kyoto is pretty good though, you wouldn't say a game is shit just because it sparked seceral games poorly trying to imitate it. Not thar CofK is any of that, the game is pretty obscure.

zukerberg

...

The feminist suffragettes were terrorists who only wanted to obtain the right to vote for upper-class white women and are responsible for the tender years doctrine.
Second-wave feminism was led by misandrists like Gloria Steinem and is responsible for the Duluth model and rape hysteria.
Both men and women would be much better off without any of the waves of feminism. All waves of feminism are garbage.

And we're stuck in between.

Was Ebert Jewish? That would explain why he wanted video games to degenerate into propaganda

Lots of people say shit.
He isn't responsible for games turning into movies.
That blame lies with consumers who support that shit and publishers who peddle that shit.
That fat fuck was kin to a person who can't read saying that books are dumb.
There have always been dipshits like that and there may always be.
People looked down on games and the people that played them right up until they became more profitable than the movie industry and could no longer be ignored.
But people without the skills to play them or the drive to figure out are immediately discouraged and crap their pants in disgust calling for real "artistic games" which to them are games for the functionally illiterate and supremely egotistical casual market.
But the real reason that push exists is because of journos making the clickbait for the dumb "feminists & SJW" cunts who don't even play games to outrage them and make them parrot what they want.
The journos are the marketing arms of several publishers which are ostensibly paid by their casual consumers which are manipulated by journos and it all just fucking creates this vicious cycle of mediocre entertainment.

Mix of Irish, Dutch, and German. Raised Roman Catholic.

Ebert also liked TPM.

He was a shit critic in general, but somehow managed to become popular despite it.

The problem is that Authoritarianism can devolve into totalitarianism. All the same, If I've gotta have one poison or the other, I'll take the one that leaves some hope for humanity.

I don't know why you're arguing schematics, extremism is extremism. It all depends on who's in control, and and I'd prefer it not being a nigger, an insane bitch, or a corporate cuck.

And not a communist.