Is Zizek a fraud and a fool?

opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/slavoj-zizek-benjamin-ramm/slavoj-i-ek-on-brexit-crisis-of-left-and-future-of-eur

I find that Zizek hates democracy more and more when he discovers that the working class don't buy into Idpol crap and aren't so stupid when it comes to dealing with immigrants and refugees. I find Zizek is too gentle when it comes to immigrant, minorities and also smears the white working class as "racist".
His support of the EU is stupid and bizarre, as it fails to protect workers and it's really an Idpol bourgeoise clubhouse, with unelected politicians controlling the lives of it's members.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LVa4ERqz97o
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Zizek likes Lenin so only if you consider Lenin to be a fraud.

This is pretty funny because the most common critique he gets is that he's too rough with immigrants/refugees and he encourages racists.

t. someone that's never read or listened to Zizek

Back to your Holla Forums torture chamber

Zizek can be called shit for a lot of reasons, but I'm getting the same impression that is getting. Lurk more

He outright criticized religious nutjob immigrants and multiculturalism

youtube.com/watch?v=LVa4ERqz97o

...

You know he is right when he is called a nazi by the sjws and a sjw by the nazis.

This

take a look in the mirror

kek, that's because everybody who doesn't praise Jamal as the savior of Europe gets accused of perpetuating racism. He obviously is too nuanced to buy this mainstream media crap so that's why they call him out.

However, in pretty much every interview I saw he was pro-immigration and I think he's genuinely wrong with this, especially since he sits in his Slovenian torture chamber that has almost no immigrants.

I disagree that Zizek is 'gentle' on migrants, but his position on them still doesn't make sense. He basically says 'let them in, but make them integrate', which presupposes the ability and willingness of both locals and migrants to make integration work. However, the evidence suggests that some migrants don't and can't integrate. Zizek is on the same side as the liberals who cry after each terrorist attack, 'we need integration!', as if various countries with various strategies hadn't been struggling and failing to do that for decades already.

You seem pretty idpol yourself cocko. Zizek needs to be harder on minorities because, why? He needs to go out of his way to pretend that racism in the white working class doesn't exist, why?


Come on that's a terrible way to think about anything.


You're perpetuating racism. You can say "ha, I said people call me racist, and you called me racist, so this racism is right" but, you're a racist. And I'm not talking about the immigration thing. I'm talking about spreading the false belief that being for immigration is because OF SOME STUPID FUCKING RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT THE LEFT IS INTENTIONALLY IMPORTING IMMIGRANTS, (WHO YOU THEN USED A Holla Forums-MEME NAME TO DESCRIBE), TO COME IN SPECIFICALLY WITH THE PURPOSE OF CHANGING THE WEST SOMEHOW, AND PRAISING THEM AS SAVIORS FOR THEIR CHANGES TO WESTERN SOCIETY

I'm not racist for wanting to have proper border control. And it's not a conspiracy (just because it's exaggerated to say "Merkel wants to replace the germans" doesn't make the concerns about what's happening right now less valid) if I see this propaganda myself everyday in the media - our border controls don't work, immigrants are being told how fabulous they are -> massive drain effect.

Which is pretty bad for the Third World as well - those who are really poor often don't have the money to make the journey and even the very few academics amongst the immigrants are the ones that are being missed in their homeland.

Whoever infiltrated the left with the kumbaya no borders shit crippled it for good.

Yes, yes you are. You want borders and you want them to keep out imaginary racial stereotypes because of paranoid alt-right conspiracy theories.
Whoever keeps trying to push this "nations should exist or be supported in any way" crap needs to be reeducation on left, right, up, and down.

reeducated*

Just wondering has a popular anarchist ever written about the incredible small lifespan an anarchist society has?

I spent a lot of time reading/lurking and just seems to be masochists posing as political revolutionaries at this point.

Transparent af

...

Le happy medium fallacy

Yes, yes you are. You want borders and you want them to keep out imaginary racial stereotypes because of paranoid alt-right conspiracy theories.
Degrees of education and social integrity are "racial stereotypes" now? It makes sense you have the flag of the most utopian ideology ever. How do you actually want to establish a libertarian socialist society that would require maximum degrees of education and capabilites of self-management with millions of African Lumpens? Serious question. At this point you just confirm that Anarchism is a form of IdPol.

An Anarchist society would be a nation as well. But yes, I actually like European culture and I would prefer it to prevail. Did you know leftists originally fought for nations and died for their establishment? Did you know Marx supported 1848 which was driven by nationalism?

A pan-European nation would be something I'd advocate, I'm not pedantic about every border there is.

Rojava. Chiapas. The Honduran campesino movement. Next question

The leftist are importing inherently violent africans named jamal to damage the west is a right wing conspiracy theory. The idea all immigrants are violent thugs is also racist nonsense.

It makes sense you have a nazi flag with a hammer and sickle shoehorned in. How are you calling yourself a communist but arguing against the very basic idea of communism?

Did you know I don't care what my faggot ass ideological ancestors did? Communism will work, I'm gonna irrelevant shit on your lawn.