I often see people say things like: "Early Christianity in Europe was like ISIS…"

I often see people say things like: "Early Christianity in Europe was like ISIS…".

I always thought it was peaceful and spreaded through monks, educated scribes, etc.

So, I'm requesting some red-pills on that topic.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial_of_Peter
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades#Northern_Crusades
ahistoryofthepresentananthology.blogspot.com/2013/03/wotan-by-carl-jung-1934.html
ww
archive.is/hnOGO
youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y#t=2m45s
archive.is/8uYGq
youtube.com/watch?v=G35Qu7H92_U
youtube.com/watch?v=hH5y71hOvk0
youtube.com/watch?v=O9IPNmIdQY0
archive.is/5x5ej
youtube.com/watch?v=yZAY-78zhmw
youtube.com/watch?v=MZVY-pGDsN4
youtube.com/watch?v=FaOSCASqLsE
youtube.com/watch?v=sAMeXjeswWg
youtube.com/watch?v=C3Ks59XGThg
youtube.com/watch?v=Wm-WI0sBou4
youtube.com/watch?v=N-Esh4W3dfI
youtube.com/watch?v=JvKIWjnEPNY
nationalvanguard.org/2015/11/communism-is-neo-christianity/
nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Maʿarri
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Gregory_I_and_Judaism
etymonline.com/index.php?term=jew
8ch.net/pdf/res/534.html
u.nya.is/soebow.7z
youtu.be/x90kI0zjI7E
archive.org/details/MarcusEliRavage-ARealCaseAgainstTheJews
archive.org/details/MarcusEliRavage-CommissaryToTheGentiles
vimeo.com/34869601
youtube.com/watch?v=_q6chUtSef4
youtube.com/watch?v=TJjIgvNa6GY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_cultural_heritage_by_ISIL
youtube.com/watch?v=XkU23m6yX04
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_War_(376–382)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Frigidus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Verden
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It quite certainly wasn't.

Not like ISIS and it wasn't peaceful. Whats the saying? Word of god in one hand and a sword in the other? ISIS/Islam just carries two blades and screams Allah.

Sage out of principle.

As far as the middle east is concerned, there wasn't much trouble with the native people. As far as the Christianized parts of the middle east went it was relatively quiet until Islam became a thing.

christianity spread because the church inherited the roman law
after the migration period there was not much left of the once advanced roman society
many tribal leaders and rulers converted to christianity so that they could rule more efficiently

During the crusades, more Christians were killed by Muslims than vice-versa. Muslims conquered forts along the Silk Road and effectively blocked all trade between Europe and China
Muslims were always shitty people and Islam has always been a shitty religion
Europe was converted from Paganism to Christianity through Missionary work. You can see this celebrated in holidays like St. Patrick's Day. Many Nordic cultures even kept their old traditions when they converted to Christianity. It was a peaceful process

Partially true. Much of the lore/tradition had to be changed to fit with Christian dogma. This means changing the role of some of the characters from being gods/heros to regular men, and as far as tradition goes, keeping Pagan roots but incorporating it into a different thing completely.

We have a thread for things like this, use it.

Long story short: monotheists don't like polytheists implying their god isn't the only one, on the other hand, polytheists don't like when monotheists imply their gods don't exist.

Why don't you actually do some of your own research OP instead of relying on Holla Forums to tell you whats what when most of em disagree on so many things about Christianity and this format is inseperable from personal bias? Go read some books and find out for yourself what life was like, thinking you are going to get anymore than a rough outlook and introduction to the topic is naieve. If you are looking for the truth you will need to dig deeper than Holla Forums. Where do you think people learn this shit in the first place? Think for yourself, don't ask to be duped by memes.

great thread faggot OP

Constantine educated European pagans in the ways of Christ at the end of his sword.

He also brought a lot of pagan holidays and rituals into Christianity to ease pagans into it.

It was anything but.
It was spread at the tip of a blade. Then enslaved the newly converted and had them spread it too.

Being an offshoot of the same faith (judaism) its no shock the that Islam and Christianity behave much the same way.

It wasn't. Not even close. The Middle ages maybe but it was as a result as a defense against Islam itself.

If you want the real red-pill, read up on the history of Islam the moment Muhammad died, unlike with Jesus. It was like ISIS from the start. India sure as hell remembers.

It was clever marketing. Pagans have this cool festival? Guess what? We have it too, but we call it xmas. You need to pray for three gods to get a good harvest, fertility and good prices with the merchant? Nobody has time for that, it's someyear AD. Join us now and you get those three prayers for the price of one, and, just for you, you come to mass with me right now and you also get off one sin - for free.
Seriously though read wikipedia or whatever, history hardly ever changes course without a good blood spill.

That depends on what you mean by "early". If you're talking about the first few centuries in Greece and Rome then it was largely non-violent (though intentionally disruptive, and Christians were quite fond of getting martyred so you can imagine the scale and nature of the disruptions) but if you're talking about later Christianization in the more northerly regions then it was a long and ugly process that was part violence, part deception and part political maneuvering.

Early Christians were Jews that changed the rules and were so successful proselytizing the "new faith" that they took on a different name. At first it spread from Asia Minor to the Mediterranean coasts.

Christianity didn't become corrupt until the 11th century.

It was just how things were back then, everybody was violent or "barbaric" the main difference being Islam continued acting like savages and we moved on toward enlightenment.

They slaughtered many pagans, also a lot of blood in the fights between catholics and protestants. The church obviously never represented Jesus but was kind of a resumption of the Roman empire. The difference to Islam is that we broke free from the churchs influence and that Mohammed the religions founder himself were a cruel warlord so the muslims cant actually say "thats not the true Islam", "Islam means peace"(yeah, after the whole world is islamized), etc.

How does that excuse the fact that ISIS is what Islam is and always has been for the whole of its existence?

Christianity in addition for much of its history had a total ban on banking, stronger than that of islam. This ban is the reason why charlemagne imported jews into europe: to deal with the apparent dirty practice of moneylending (somehow the ban on borrowing did not stem the need).

Christians before the emperor constantine were almost exclusively slaves or women. There are several recorded instances of high ranked women such as senator's wives.

The church tries to forget that era for reasons which quickly become apparent to those who investigate.

it was, in that isis and christianity are both just jewish proxy groups of retarded shabos goyim doing whatever shlomo tells them.

...

Eastern Europe, bloody. I remember a mass baptism in (now) Russia, quite a few drowned.
But when has Eastern Europe seen a lasting peace?

Most other places pretty peaceful. Notice how most can not cite a source or place of violence in conversion.

Also teutons kind of a shit, Lithuania stronk

If you want to make comparisons to ISIS then look to the pan-European 'Celtic' armies of the fourth and third centuries BC - fanatical, highly-organized head-hunting warrior elite mother fuckers who conquered Alexander's kingdom of Macedonia and smashed the Greeks before making off with the loot. Julius Caesar and his successors set about smashing them for a reason.
Strange how the Irish converted peacefully and of their own volition to Christianity without any warfare or conquest. The Saxons weren't so lucky - they were genocided by the Franks for their heathenism.

Depends how early you're talking. Previous to ~200, Christianity was just like any other of the myriad mysteries, philosophies, and monotheistic cults spreading throughout Rome, as elites and peasants alike dabbled in random religions deviating from Jupiter. The reason it stuck was that Christians had large sway with the poor of society via alms, gave the elites the ability to virtue signal for money they didn't need, and as a result had an out-of-proportional amount of following in the legions. It also, early on, deliberately associated itself with other monotheistic religions such as the cult of Sol Invictus which also had an out-of-proportion following in the camps (this is why older portraits of Saints and Christ have a sun-like circle behind their head) and adopting elements of Stoic philosophy which, again, had an out-of-proportion following.

By the time Constantine came to power roughly 25% of the legionary base was Christian and roughly 10% of Greater Roman society was as well. At first, Constantine was ambiguous as fuck about what he really worshipped - the Chi Ro, for example, meant Wisdom in Greek and was often used by scholars to point out something wise, and he used it for his story of the cross in the sky so that incase the christian god bit didn't work out it could just be played off as wisdom. After Constantine takes over the empire, through what is a dramatic, but not entirely out-of-place or particularly religiously motivated civil war (the empire had been in a state of on again-off-again civil war for literally the last 100 yeas) Christianity takes the place of just another cult, but the Emperor's favored cult. You can see an example of the effect the example the Empeor's favored cult has on local conversions by looking at the cult of Antinous, Hadrian's concubine, which sprung up all over during his reign and death - letting the emperor know you supported his cult was a major way to ensure his favor.

That's how Christianity spread in the early days, post-Costantine but Pre-Theodosius II. Life simply became easier for you if you were a Christian, you would be more easily promoted in X field, you could chose to gives taxes to churches and give less total money that way, all Constantinople's Senators were Chrsitan, etc, etc. Later emperors made life harder to be a Pagan, denying promotions or entry into the upper classes, though even into the Byzantine era we don't see examples of Pagan-targeting inquisitions because it was never really an "other" just a "different."

In the West, after the fall of Rome, all the tribes slowly began to recognize that the best way to get the romanized locals to accept your rule as legitimate rulers was to adopt their religion. Also, remember, up until Attilla enters Gaul in 405, Rome is still the tippy top dog in the West even if its grip is slipping, and many tribes (Visigoths, for example) simply converted so that they could rule X land "In the emperor's stead" and not risk attracting undue wrath while they stole Rome's provinces out from under her.

...

After Constantine, the Christians changed gears from:
To:

And this happened overnight while the Roman Empire still existed. There was no "shift" after the fall of Rome, they were always like that since the moment Constantine gave them power.
The history of the West Roman Empire after Christianity was one of endless Civil Wars of Christians trying to kill Pagans and the pagans resisting it.
It was so bad that the Goths just rolled over the empire later.

You're falling for a goalpost-moving technique. You're wasting time arguing about early Christianity when instead we need to focus on ISIS. Next time just say something like "ISIS is definitely medieval, archaic, barbaric, and must be stopped. We can't afford to let in migrants from terrorist nations right now."

I am fukkin laughing lad

Justinian I shut down the last center of pagan theology in 600, 300 years after Constantine comes to power

Please point me in the direction of a civil war christian versus pagan, really, I have yet to see a religiously motivated civil war in roman history - The empire collapsed because since the moment Alexander Severus was murdered at the hands of his own troops imperial succession was based upon who could get the army the most money for the least amount of work, which then bled the taxpayers dry and resulted in the armies spending more time looting roman provinces than defending the borders. Look up the Crisis of the Third Centry. Domnitian was able to pause the storm for 20 years but after he died he basically ended up drawing a giant tournament bracket for who would be sole emperor and 20 more years of warring ensued. Then Constantine took power and his dynasty was subject to a mountain of palace intrigue as the various sycophants at court attempted to turn his heirs into puppet rulers and used imperial authority to purge their enemies. Christianity did have a negative influence on the empire post-Nicaea, when it becomes time to waste resources converting everyone to the correct version of Christianity.

Also the Goths never rolled over anything lol, the Goths routinely got their ass spanked and only managed to wreak havoc raiding in the empire when the Eastern and Danube legions were busy with the Persians, they only actually began taking territory after Attilla absorbs them into his empire and invades Gaul

Please point to me an example of overt, hostile, christian-on-pagan persecution, because even into the 700s the Isaurians of Greece were pagan and unharassed and a fucking dynasty of emperors came from them

Sage, but it was largely spread by converting the regency of nations and then from the top down, with the Church taking on major portions of social support.

t. Christfag

People actually liked Christianity because it imposed basic morals key to a prosperous community. It was never spread by force and terror like Islam was and is today. The red pill is leftist revisionists are trying to make the entire world believe Christians were just as bad as Muslims, when in reality Christians were only lusting for blood during the Inquisitions, and that was after a thousand years of Christianity and it had more to do with politics and power than religion itself, it was only religious in the sense that it was the Catholic Church that was stomping down opposition. On the other hand, Islam was always about jihad, since its conception and it spread by warring on peaceful Christians and consuming civilizations until all was left was unsustainable muslim degeneracy that required the neverending expansion of islam by raids on christian lands.

On the crusades, they were only fought in the holy land, with the purpose of reconquering the holy land, and there were never raids on muslim controlled lands for sex slaves and booty.

christianity went from savagery to cuckery
islam went from savagery to more savagery to savagery to a retarded amount of savagery

It was Jewish, so it spread through murder and lies.

If Islam ends up conquering Europe, the same types of people cucking for Jesus today will be cucking for Mohammad 200 years from now.

picture related. It's your picture related. kys

False. The morals existed before Christianity. Christianity was adopted because it was a religion for plebs and subhumans that preached equality, so it appealed to the masses like it's fellow Jewish ideologies liberalism and communism that succeeded it. Christianity was merely a left wing liberationist movement that mobilized the subhuman masses against the patriarchal and right wing aristocratic traditionalist Roman empire.

The second sentence is wrong. Christianity was occasionally spread by force, but often for more political reasons than solidly religious reasons. What is true, however, is that it nevertheless imbued European societies with strong morals and gave Europeans the worldview necessary for the development of scientific principles that would eventually coagulate into what we now call the scientific method. If God is constant and imposed natural laws on the universe, then we have the safe expectation that the universe can and will behave in a consistent manner.

You can thank Christian whites for that computer you're typing on right now; without their contributions vis-a-vis an inspired curiosity in the handiwork of God, we wouldn't even understand electricity.

Now I understand why I'm seeing a lot of 'go back to halfchan' posts.
What makes you think your post is a good idea in the least? To whom is it truly directed, what effect did you hope to cause? I can nearly guarantee it was ineffective at best, emboldening at worst.

Well, thanks for solidifying my position with OP. Good luck with your sociopathy.

A great portion of it was spread by missionaries who converted rulers who in turn had their subjects converted, but as can be seen in certain areas of Europe such as the baltic states, there was a fair amount of coercion involved outside of the usual "You will go to hell if you do not convert". The coercion in the baltic states was known as the northern crusades.

Perhaps those people weren't talking about how Christians treated non-Christians though. They could be attempting to draw comparison between the way both religions treat their own heretics, which is more easily argued for if you look at how certain parties were handled in the early Christian councils. In roughly the same vein, they could have been referring to the Albigensian Crusades in Aquitaine which are viewed by certain people as a genocide, perpetrated by christians against christians.

Not really. The scientific revolution was mostly descended from scholasticism of Aquinas, which he 100% stole from Aristotle and then hamfistedly shoehorned into christcuckoldry. You can thank pagans for the scientific revolution.

Every post serves the purpose of furthering my own greatness on a pile of dead cats with arrwos in their asses. I hope I ansered your question. Would you like to know more?

Kind of. Too lazy to find pic related?
Also that pic is really stale.

This

Catholism is satanic. It is antichristian and doesn't follow the bible. The Vatican and the jesuits are the modern day roman army trying to rule everyone.


Christmas and Easter are pagan/Roman Catholic and not in the bible. Puritans knew this and didn't celebrate pagan holidays.

Up yours, kike. Also Varg is wrong on this and a lot of things actually

There's literally tons of stuff about it, just search yourself.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_pagans_in_the_late_Roman_Empire

Christianity was to Europe then what Islam is to Europe now.

...

Literally. I'm no Catholic, but these idiots celebrate all sorts of secular holidays but for some reason, they don't like Halloween or Easter or Christmas?

Never seen a Christian not like Christmas, it's the established day to celebrate a birthday that nobody knows the real date to.

The bible was originally compiled by catholic biships at the council of nicea. If you believe catholocism is satanic, why worship the book they put the imprimatur of christian legitimacy on? Christians are tards anyway. They never know anything about how christianity spread and how it mutated along its spread. There are whole branches of christianity and its descendants about which you remain woefully ignorant; you have no more claim to legitimacy than the Mandeans or the Manicheans.

Islam is just a heterodox branch of Christianity, which is just a messianic branch of Judaism.

That's how I understand it anyways…

Let's not forget about what the Christians did in Scandinavia and Germany. Especially Charlemagne. Not unlike ISIS in the Middle East today.

Not even going to back up your arguments huh? You think posting a kikepedia article and "research it yourself" is going to fool anybody here?

You're a retard. There were multiple canons of the Bible before the Catholics made theirs.

There still are. The Protestants have theirs, The Catholics have the same canon as the Protestants (Latin Codex instead of Hebrew + Greek Erasmus though) but they also include the Apocrypha, and the Various Orthodox denominations have even more.

Just like Muslims, the Christians played the victim and practiced taqiyya until they had the power to take over. We are seeing the same thing play out again today with Muslim infiltrators. And the people who are christcucks today will be Muslims in the future and argue that it is our heritage and so on.

Destroyed idols, yes
Funny, they did this to themselves after the Renaissance puttered a bit.

One thing that can not be unstated is that Christianity allowed for change. These disgusted and furious denouncers are proof. In a semitic or arabic domain this would not be tolerated.
One could say it's allowance of cucking, or one could say it's self restraint. Both are true to this user. The age of the father is long gone, the age of the son now ends in cries against worship of a kike on a stick. Now the age of the holy ghost is upon us.
We need a damn good name for Logos, and we need it soon.

Oh shit anons.
Shadilay

I'm well aware of that. I've read many of the Nag Hammadi gospels quite a few times. It's just that christians usually think of the bible as some monolith handed down by god without any alterations or discrepancies, when even the most basic knowledge of history would prove that it's anything but.

this

I'll give you ONE example, you shitty lazyfag:
Look for Magnus Maximus.

Except for the fact that Europe and it's kings adopted Christianity, they were not conquered by it.


Alrighty, but the canon itself is just a matter of which books to include. If you want to look for alterations, compare the different manuscripts.

Why not include the Gospel of Thomas? Why not include The Hypostasis of the Archons - Hell, why not include the Tao te Ching, now there's a book that I read in full every few months, I always feel edified when I start working through it.

Early Christianity consisted of a small sect being persecuted and thrown to the Lions.

The persecution backfired and made it grow bigger.
Seems Shlomo in the OP 2000 years later still hasn't grasped this basic.

Btw, start worrying about the real oven, real holocaust down there in hell for lying to the public with numbers like that.

Only because the plebs adopted the religion first and it gave them power over the plebs. Because christcuckoldry is a religion for subhumans (drug addicts, prostitutes, masturbators, and others with poor impulse control).

In feat of Irony, Protestants are more intolerant of the Nag Hammadi Gospels due to Sola Scriptura than Catholics, who just want enjoy playing politics ocasionally.

Only thing that matters is that the origin of it all, Judaism, is eradicated first. Then Christianity and Islam need to vaporise at the same time. They have no place in Europe or anywhere else in the world. If people still need to cling to Gods, let them worship Apollo or something.

I don't know, it just doesn't sound like you're very knowledgeable about Christianity nor it's history especially.

Explain then why Kings of Germanic tribes such as Visigoths and Franks converted, prompting the rest of germanics to convert aswell.

Clovis converted to Christianity and he was King of the Franks.

Because that's Aryan, so it's like poison to followers of messianic Judaism.

Why do pagans almost exclusively circlejerk over the norse pantheon? I mean, if you're going to LARP and pretend anyway, why does nobody choose the roman or greek pantheons? Or celtic if you're into that.

It doesn't help that they were likely written by a muslim, user.

The Jews heavily persecuted Christians at the start to begin with. Funny how they keep forgetting to mention that.

For trading opportunities. Converting allowed them access to trade with the christcuck horde. Same reason you will see European elites converting to Islam soon enough. It gets them political and economic power. But the only reason it ever got to that point to begin with was because it spread amongst the subhuman niggers and kikes subjugated by Rome.

Possibly but their contents are too mystic type. Possibly writings of a Sufi or a Zoroaster?

Regardless even in NT St. Paul warns there will be texts to confuse people away from the Apostles.

How vile certain "people" get at the mention of Jesus and Christianity tells you all you need to know.

Early Christianity's growth in Europe came at the tip of a sword. There were massive (unrecorded) battles in Europe in the 6th-9th centuries, especially with the Germanic/Nordic tribes. The entire mythology about viking invaders is based on the accounts of Catholic invaders.

The religion and philosophy of Christianity, the kind adopted by so many today in the West, took centuries to pacify. That was entirely due to the calming effects of the Europeans upon the religion, and not vice-versa.

Fuck Islam, and most of all FUCK JEWS !!!

Christians back then were trying to survive after Western roman colapse and didn't have much trade to offer. Your argument doesn't hold much water.

Kings of Germanics deemed Christianity as good, as much as JIDF pays you to type christcuck you can't change that fact.

All the Christians back then were Jews, so it was just Jewish infighting. Why should we care? Sympathizing with ancient Jews who were the enemy of your ancestors is the height of cuckoldry. You're the equivalent janissaries.

This is completely false.

They were written hundreds of years before Mohammad ever existed. I swear, when did Holla Forums become mentally retarded?

You mean Saul of Tarsus, 100% Torah observant Jew.

Elaborate other than just saying "false".


A new religion was borned, and the loyalists to the old pharisee/hebrew religion that refused to change (prototype of jews) were utterly anihalated by Roman Empire later.

Survivors wrote the Talmud to rationalize that, and the Jew as known today is merely 1700 years old. There is no more connection to the characters of the Old Testament.
Also it's obvious the Yids were abandonded by YHWH in 70 AD.

Nice fuhrer dubs

I'm still laughing how much Jews to this day have this psychotic hatred of Jesus. I'm not big on Jesus but he makes them unbelievably butthurt like nothing else.

St. Paul dissolved away the Torah causing massive asshurt in Pharisee community, such a big asshurt 2000 years later jews still upset.

You mean Roman era Christianity, it was not so much violent as it was dogmatic and assertive. Even when early Christians got excited about Martyrdom, they didnt wage holy wars, they went to the pagan governor, imma christian kill me plox. As you can imagine, most governors thought they were crazy fools.

You change history just so it fits your prejudice. Christian martyrs did NOT kill other people. Putting Christianity over their own lives is what fascinated a lot of bystanders who would later convert.

The gospels are fake news and the utility of the christian mythos is an egalitarian lie and cuckoldry

pic related, they are all similar


Digits speak truth?


Is that really considered 'early Christianity', though?
I would think 'early' would be the period from Jesus-Constantine (1-300 AD) where Christianity was not yet violent since it really had no power?


Any truth that he may have corrupted Christianity?
Hitler seemed to think so: "The decisive falsification of Jesus's doctrine was the work of St. Paul.." if the "Table Talk" is to be believed.


That's what I'd assume. People here seem to think 'early' is Crusade era (1000 AD) or something.


I believe so

Welcome to the world wide web information superhighway.

This is why I roll my eyes whenever I see the vargposters going on with the "christianity is a tool of the jews!" shit. If that were true, then the kikes wouldn't be writing in their own holy books about how Jesus is boiling in a vat of semen in hell, and they wouldn't be constantly trying to undermine christianity at every turn. If it were really just a tool of the jews, then you'd see the jews trying to convince more gentiles to drop the fedoras and go to church. You'd see far more of the "jews for jesus" shit. But you don't.

Christianity spread via a highly adaptive mix of violence, pacifism, and focused autistic memeing. Constantine the Great, for example, is said to have converted in order to win victory in a civil war, but his mother and sister were pacifist relic hunters. Cyril of Alexandria was firm on the Church's abhorrence of bloodshed, but he also tried to get a rival executed for heresy and may have incited a mob to kill Hypatia. St. Augustine wrote Confessions, which was a how-to manual on how to Christcuck, but he also wrote City of God, in which he promulgated the doctrine of the Just War in order to excuse the genocide of the Circumcellions.

The Merovingians, from Charles the Hammer to Charlemagne, were anything but peaceful; Charlemagne exterminated the Saxon pagans without mercy and tore down their sacred fucking trees, for example, but Sts. Patrick and Cyril peacefully carried the faith to Ireland and Russia, respectively.

In later years, after contact with mudslimes, Christianity adopted the whip and sugar approach of Islam – You get one chance to see the light, after which we must regretfully slay you. Reformation Protestantism took a lot from this attitude and carried that enthusiasm with it to North America and South Africa. All the same, if the natives looked like they wanted to put on shirts and stop with the human sacrifice, missionaries handed them a bible and a cross and gave them a new Christian name as if they were human.

Jesus wasn't a warlord like Mohammed, and his religion really was originally crafted for slaves, but more adaptable successors learned to be nice and flexible when they wanted to be.

Pic related is captioned "Alexemanos worships his god," and seems to be the first-ever depiction of Jesus.

Not a new religion. It's messianic Judaism.

No, just Jews. Hebrews were Jews. Jews are an ethnic/biological group, not a religion christkike. You can read the old testament and see that the behavior of the ancient Hebrew kikes is exactly the same as the behavior of modern kikes. Moses was a kike, David was a kike, Abraham was a kike, and you read their stories and revere them and their semitic religion. You teach your children morals from these Jewish fables, tell them that behaving like a kike is good. You are a subhuman scum and traitor to your ancestors.

The Roman Emperor Julian the Philosopher wrote about how shit christ cuckery is and all of the Third Reich's command agreed that cuckstianity is shit and worked to destroy it

This

I get that the indo-european religions are all very similar. But that still doesn't address why everyone that takes up the mantle of neo-paganism goes the norse route almost exclusively. I have NEVER seen or heard of a neo-pagan worshiping the greek/roman pantheons. Only ever norse.

Because Jews around the world are known for being straightforward and never playing both sides of an argument. Surely they would tell us if they secretly liked Christianity and wielded it like a weapon when it was convenient.

Pretty good summary.

Christianity was largely not spread by the sword, especially in what we call Western Europe (especially the once-Roman regions). There are a few examples that are arguably 'by the sword' but not at all on the level of ISIS, notably the conversion of Icelandic and Danish. The Danish were (partially) converted as a condition of surrender to the English. Iceland was converted after the local pagan 'champion' who was considered impervious to fire was burned by Christian-blessed fire, and then slain in the resulting fight - the rest of the nation saw Christianity as the more powerful faith because of this and thus followed it. Both involved bloodshed to some degree but they were not exactly 'terroristic'

The only somewhat apt comparisons would be the execution of the Saxons, and the Teutonic crusade into Lithuania. Perhaps some of the inter-faith wars (Crusades against the Hussites, anti-Pope wars, Protestant and Catholic wars) would count too as they got fairly brutal at times.

One final thing is that a lot of sources today will tell you that people only converted for secular reasons. This is atheist (and pagan in this thread) butt-hurt over something they do not understand. A lot of people have had faith over the years; to assume everyone only adopted it for selfish secular reasons is the height of arrogance and reeks of post-modernism. It may have been the case in some instances, but there's no reason to believe it would be so in the majority, and anyone who tells you otherwise is just trying to press their desired beliefs onto history.


Most under rated post of the thread. Basically just tell them they're wrong, and then do as this guy says and say it is irrelevant. Getting bogged down in arguments that have no bearing on the present is silly.

Exactly the same as Islam. No honor among followers of Jewish religions.

They probably crucified Him just for turning over the money changers' tables.

Yeah, like I said they played the victim until they had power. The entire idea of a martyr is just victim worship and Jewish persecution mythos. It's completely Jewish, not Aryan.

Oh please, this is ridiculous. This isn't like liberalism vs neoconservatism where you can clearly see the yids playing both sides. Jews fucking hate christianity. Not in a "we're just pretending to hate it but we actually want you to go to church" sort of way. They hate christianity, they hate christians, and they hate christ.

I keep reading Abrahamic religions and history to try to make sense of this clusterfuck and to me their God abandoned them because of how many times they tried to Jew and lawyer them. I mean in the Talmud they literally wrote the worst heresy in their own faith that a mere man could outargue, lawyer, and swindle God. Then there's the whole existence of Israel, which their God said is not permitted under any circumstances until God himself says so, which he hasn't, or some magical messiah comes and that hasn't happen either. So Israel itself is an illegal state under the laws of Judaism. All the other things they keep disobeying as well. To me it's just endlessly sad that there's no real point to Jewish existence that they've literally built up upon desert fairy tales actual archaeology and history refuses to support. They are orphaned little babies and crazies and they're not even Jews by the writings of actual Jews ages ago. If Moses saw the Jews today, he'd probably beat them all to death with the stone tablets inscribed with the Decalogue.

Norse paganism was defeated and description of their behaviour.. was preserved by Christians.
In other words, the higher up jew can use such types as controlled opposition.
You think it's mere coincidence so much Varg-posting and always same imagemacro?

Roman and Greek polytheism on the other hand, involve civilizations that destroyed the Hebrews. Greeks with Seleucid Empire, Romans with Roman-Jewish wars.

Norse were too far away geographically so it's safe controlled opposition. Stay vigilant.

Yeah, they hate christianity so much as it helps flood Europe with shitskins. Your meme religion is dead. It happens. That's why you can't get doctrine confused with eternal truths, because if you do, you've made your mind a field ripe for seeding with subversion.

Christianity was twisted from the start. Jmmanuel (aka Jesus) was a sincere man who tried to do right by society, but he was about 2000 years ahead of his time. No one could understand him and the concepts that he tried to teach. So instead, the Jews nailed him to a cross.

He survived that, BTW, said "Fuck the Jews, you guys have to learn on your own", and went to live with the Hindus in Kashmir, where he was respected as a wise man.

Early Christianity spread thinly-but-far n wide. It wasn't really used as a force for evil until it bacame a State religion in the 3rd century, though some of the original apostles weren't saints.

Yet, the faggot got killed campaigning in persia and his plans for a third kike templed ended in flames.

This. It's typical for leftyfags to displace the blame from their sacred cows back onto things they are sanctioned to attack instead, namely: whites, males, Christians, heterosexuals, etc.

That's not that different. It makes more sense if you differenciate between Hebrews (people from Persia and Egypt who congregated to make up 12 tribes of Israel) and practiced Old Testamenta and awaited Messiah with..

Messiah rejectors and later Talmudic writers. The Jew by Holla Forums standards only makes sense with the Talmud, where even YHWH/G-D/God is a Goy for them.

Basically, after rejecting Jesus, the pharisees expected a Messiah to defeat Rome. What happened instead was a total wipeout of Judeah and renamed of the region to Palestine, and Pharisees forbbiden to visit their own sacred places.

Meanwhile the people who followed Christ managed somehow to convert the whole Roman Empire to Christianism.

But Judaism as a name is deceptive. Moses as you mention had different beliefs and behaviour from Jews of today. Different religion possibly, given the different Holy Books used.

Looking at ancient graffiti, shitposting and memeing hasn't changed in thousands of years. They shouldn't act like Holla Forums is some new revolutionary extremist thing. This play is way more tame than the insane boomers were during the 60s and 70s rape, murder, drugs, and terrorist attacks every damn day of the week with a burning car on every corner blasting shitty music at the gayest festivals that have ever taken place in history.

I guess the obsession with all things German/Aryan around here?
Or that Greco-Roman seems more distant in both time and race?


lol, jews BTFO by God again

False. Many Jews like Christianity and see that christcucks are good for the Jews. Ben Shapiro is one example. Also all the "Judeo-Christian values" kikes.

Jews actually just hate Europeans. You will never see Jews siding with our cause, but you can see many siding with Christians all the time. Attacking Christianity is just a proxy for attacking Europeans for them.

It really is strange to think about. Other religions have a purpose. Christians live moral lives in order to go to heaven, and then Judgment Day. Hindus try to rack up good karma so they can be reincarnated in a higher caste, and the same idea with buddhists trying to get to nirvana.

…and then there's the Jews. There's no end game. Their religion doesn't actually give them anything to look forward to. The jews are the jews, you will always be my chosen people no matter what you do or believe, follow my 600 nitpicky talmudic commandments, and that's that. No wonder they're rootless cosmopolitans when their religion is just as aimless.

...

Christians lead a moral life in order to not succumb to evil an become shitty people. It's not very complicated.

Mohammed was a literal warlord. Jesus was a charismatic preacher that died on a cross rather than ask his followers to start a war. Know the difference, shlomo.

The Norse Gods survived longer than the Greek and Roman ones, that's why. It also has more interesting lore and is more manly (Valhalla) so of course it'd win out relative to the others.

Yeah, because dying on a cross to fill our hearts with feelings of warmth and goodness towards the shitskins trying to wipe us out is exactly what we need right now. Jesus was a bad example for our times.

"Judeo-Christianity" is something jews made up to fool people. It has absolutely no basis in history or reality. Judaism and Christianity are entirely different religions, and Judaism is in fact younger than Christianity.

Judaism is not the same as the old Yahweh worshiping faiths. The Pharisees which were a specific sect that had massive (and violent) conflicts with many of the other sects are what became the Jews of today (their Oral Torah - which is what made them especially different to the rest, it was the 'traditions of men' that Protestants have such a problem with - became their talmud when it was codified). The jews even admit that they come from the pharisees.

The argument that jews like Christians is simply ridiculous. Jews hate Christians and always have, any apparent 'friendship' is always a time where they are trying to manipulate or trick Christians. No exceptions.

No, Jews are a biological problem. That's what you christkikes fail to see because your brains have been poisoned with semitic cancer. And the Talmud is no worse than the old testament. Old testament is a book for subhumans that preaches an immoral semitic ethos, and Talmud is the same.

Their endgame is waiting for the Messiah. They are in denial that Jesus was the Messiah, and 2000 years later keep waiting for what already arrived long ago.

But yes it is aimless. Roman Empire destroyed all their holy places, forbbid the mourning of the dead of the jewish armies, and destroyed almost all of their religious scrolls. Judaism never recovered.

Even Zionism is Secular.

Norse paganism is doctrinally different from Judaism and its faggot offspring. In an Abrahamic religion, God is all-powerful and rules you with Oriental absolutism. He sees every secret thought and punishes you for trifles that aren't worth your time. Jewistry encourages weakness and passivity. To get what you want in these toxic faiths, just ask Dad; if he wants to give you some free gibsmedats, you've got it free of charge. If not, then the final answer is no. It is the purest tyranny imaginable, of the sort Rabbis like to exercise over the parents of kids they fuck.

In Norse mythology, meanwhile, you the human are not off the hook for anything. You want something badly enough to ask for it? Start planning – you need to design your own uniquely bound runes, cast them somehow (early memeing?) and ask for your boon.
This is not simply a prayer, though. You still have to take steps to get what you want, such as a home, a family, victory in combat, etc. If, and only if, your efforts toward the goal please the gods of the north, then they will push aside some obstacles for you. You can still get what you want without their blessing; it's just harder to do and takes more effort. And you can give up or fail even with their blessing. It's up to you.

Do you see right away the difference? In the former religion, typically for the Middle East, you are a slave and beholden to a king who barely notices you. Pray for favor, and maybe he'll take pity and do it all for you like a busy parent. He also cares more about your porn habits at forty than your mom did when you were fourteen.

Odin and Thor aren't despots; they're powerful allies. And you aren't a slave; you're free to live as you will, without guilt. They help, but they won't fucking carry your lazy ass. Even better, it doesn't even matter if you literally believe in it. Identifying a goal, making a formal declaration that you want it, and then working toward that goal are how you make shit happen anyway. Imagining the Oldfather sweeping away hurdles for you just helps keep things in focus while you earn your rewards.

Are you starting to see why white men invented Norse paganism, while shitskin deminigger slaves invented the other three shit-tier religions? One is worthy of a proud man who will happily die for his village, the other is for galley slaves.

You're so retarded it hurts. Taqiyya is lying, which is completely antithetical to Christian practice. Read the Bible.

Julius Evola warns against the materialistic trap. Also pic related. Plus jews have blandda upped with almost every race in the world no wonder they have no problem in promoting race mixing on Talmudvision.

It's really hard to say how much of jews' belief/behavior formed after the split with christianity. I get that modern judaism is mostly talmudic/rabbinical, but at the same time, you can look right in the bible and see plenty of instances of ancient jews acting just like the modern ones.

When Moses led the yids out of Egypt, what did they do? Nothing but kvetch and moan every step of the way
How did the jews conquer canaan? They subverted the city-states from within.
Hell, look at the book of Ester and the shit they now celebrate as Purim. The kikes infiltrate persian society, trick the king into listening to them, and end up taking power and slaughtering all the persians in response to an alleged shoah attempt of the jews. Sounds just like the goddamn holohoax narrative to me.
And then we have Jesus in the New Testament overturning the tables of the (((money changers))).
Some things never change.

Mainstream nerd culture made it cool. Tons of beta leftists love it.

False. Christianity is messianic Judaism.

False. Judaism predates Christianity. The Talmud was written after, but the Talmud is not a different religion. It is merely religious commentary, similar to theology books written about the Bible by christcucks. The religion of ancient kikes was still Judaism. You worship a kike who followed that religion and you read stories about kikes like Moses and Abraham who also followed that religion.

You're cowering away from this..


That's not Christianity. Jesus simply understood that the moment his movement started having Pharisee spies was the moment to call it quits.

Also he completed most of his work. Point of Crucifixition is not pathological pacifism, but simply the leader giving his life in return to save that of his followers (at the time Apostles).

You clearly didn't read his post.

False. Christianity (messianic Judaism) is immoral. Christians are the strongest supporters of white genocide in the world.

I like how you automatically jumped into shilling against christianity without even reading my post.

I asked why you guys always choose to worship the norse pantheon rather than other pantheons like roman or greek. Nothing you posted had anything to do with what I asked.

You know, reading the Quran, not only do I fail to grasp how on earth it can be called the "religion of peace" but it's Muhammad's own physical description. Muhammad was really white according to the Quran. It's beyond funny to me.

He was an uncharismatic rabbi

Sure they were.

That was before the Arab invasion, dipwad. Egyptians were white.

He actually doesn't. Try reading his books.

...

I have read Evola, bad news my friend.

And Christcuckoldry is an essentially materialist religion anyway.


Christians lie all the time. Being a dishonorable lying kike is the core of the religion.

First day on Holla Forums?

Christianity literally preaches that it is a sin to lie about your faith just to save your own skin.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial_of_Peter

He didn't believe race is solely material. I have read all of his books and can assure you I know a lot more about what he thought than you do.

Christianity is actually a materialist religion, yes. Evola wasn't, but that's because Evola believed in tantra and Hindu doctrine.

You sound like a kindergardener and should re-read everything then.

Being a non-materialistic and denying the existence of matter are different things.

If you couldn't grasp it after reading "all" of Evola's books, I have bad news. Either your IQ or your Bluff isn't very good.

You sure it's not literally everything besides white nationalist groups? There's people in Christianity that are leftwing and people that are rightwing. Just like there's left and right atheists or left and right pagans.

It's beyond amusing to me. Even fucking Mudslimes accept that Jesus is the messiah and both these religions amassed the largest following in the history of the world. You'd think they would take a hint already.

Of course, I'd rather the world be free from all of it.

If you think Christianity is a materialistic religion, then it means Holla Forums is colaborating with the kikes.

Yes, I know. You clearly don't understand the difference, since you believe in some dualistic nonsense whereby a kike can be biologically a kike yet not really a kike. Doesn't work that way.

That doesn't follow.

What you say is why saying they were abandonded by YHWH is even worse to them than being called kike.

Sounds too close at home.

Even Hermeticists do and they have been running the show for millenia before us.
Pshh kid go back to gaia and let the big dawgs play.


Holla Forumsers want to use jesus as an icon but have a problem with jesus refusal of materialism so they push the idea that Christianity is a materialistic religion as try to drag more young teenagers to their bolshevick ideas.

More clear now?

Catholism is satanic. It is antichristian and doesn't follow the bible. The Vatican and the jesuits are the modern day roman army trying to rule everyone.


Christmas and Easter are pagan/Roman Catholic and not in the bible. Puritans knew this and didn't celebrate pagan holidays.

Yes I'm sure. Most people only passively go along with it. Christkikes actively contribute time and money to replacing the white race with shitskins. More money than anyone else by a few orders of magnitude, in fact.

No they don't.

Erhm, it's their point #1.

Can we all agree that this (pics related) is not going to save Europe?

No it isn't. Hermeticism is nondual. "All is one"

Of course. Those are result of marxist and talmudvision subversion.

However those pictures are symptoms of the underlying cultural disease.

Confusing with Alchemy. Hermeticism has THE ALL and the ALL contained in All.

Julius Evola gives importance to race but also gives importance to a whole load of immaterial stuff and religious cycles based on oriental esoteric thought.

Go actually read your first evola.

Obviously. Importing shitskins doesn't get rid of white genocide.

Yup, these cherrypicked examples sure convinced me it's time to drop the kike on a stick and start worshiping Thor! Christianity itself is definitely responsible for the cucking of white people, despite being the prevalent religion of our people for the past 2 millennia. Really activated my almonds

wth I love Paganism now

It's almost as if proof of KGB and USSR trying to subvert Orthodox and Catholic Church exist, woha.

Don't even bother user, you'll just make the anti-christians in here go bonkers for suggesting Cultural Marxism and those who created it cough fucking Jews cough might have to do with the massive amounts of societal decay and degeneracy that pervade everything as well as controlling the narrative or window of socially acceptable dialogue. Much like you'd make MGTOW fags go nuts for claiming it's the kikes instead of women.

Thanks for pointing out the speck in my eye.

Wrong. The church instigated some rather brutal crusades against the pagans of Europe. Typical semitic barbarity of a semitic religion.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades#Northern_Crusades

What you implying, there is lot more cucked atheists and pagans than Christians. Like anyone, Christians can be brainwashed by leftist propaganda.

It's kind of ironic. After the kikes finally manage to subvert Christianity, everything starts turning to shit, and they still don't accept the Messiah, even Mudslimes have done so, and jews have no endgame in their religion other than seeing God as a Goy.


So the mighty Viking warriors suddenly turn into opressed people defeated by "cuckstian" soldiers?

It's the same thing.

Lol I have read all of his books you dumb faggot. Even his hermeticism book, which you clearly haven't read or you would know its connection with alchemy.

You are using lol and using Ego internet persona. Lurk at least 2 years you fucking faggot.

No Alchemy is not same thing as Hermeticism.

It isn't exactly cherry picked. Look up the amount of resources christcucks pour into third world causes. Christianity is literally the number one anti-white force on earth today, by far.

Well they try to teach civilization and how to hunt and fish so they don't need to come to 1st world countries after.

Secular West just gives massive foreign aid in money ending up in third wolders reproducing like rabbigs and then starve and then "syrian refugees".

Vikings? Are you hallucinating? Do you think Vikings were the only pagans in Europe around that time?

...

...

No they don't. They give billions of dollars to overpopulating shitskins, and then.they adopt them in numbers far exceeding that of any other group. Christianity is anti-white. Christians are anti-white. And they will be exterminated on the day of the rope.

This just proves me more how Jesus really was their Messiah. Jesus/Christianity did essentially conquer Rome but their God punished them for rejecting him. The Jews got their wish but still bitch about him. Bunch of ingrates.

That's the cruxifix of it all.

Let's go to the Jewish claim and Israel somehow magically belongs to them. In their own Jewish crazybook, they admit that the land was never theirs and that they stole it by Holocausting the Canaanites.

Then the following Roman period and being steamrolled by Titus, who had no time for love and only desktop threads you look at the centuries and whole existence of Israel changing hands and not even for the majority of history did it ever belong to the Jews. Think about it. If the Myth of the Kingdom of David was true, it even didn't last for more than 70 years after which the Hebrews live in scattered communities till the Assyrians captured them and disposed 10 out of their 12 claimed tribes/bandits till the Romans came and expelled those two tribes out of the land. Through modern day archeology, we find out through the archeological evidence that Egyptians really did not enslave Jews and have them build the pyramids or anything of the sort that would have anything to do with Moses and if there was no Jewish slavery or Moses in Egypt then the entire story of Moses and desert wandering is bullshit as well which makes the entire existence of the Jewish people complete lies and nothing. The land they call Israel belonged to Christianity and Islam centuries longer than it ever belonged to the Jews and the Jews admit it never belonged to them to begin with but to the Canaanites. If anything, those other religions have a stronger claim that Israel rightfully belongs to them than Jews do and we can't just magically bring back the Canaanites the Jews Holocausted either. It had never been the land of the Jews. What the historical and archeological record says about Jews is that Jews were always a minority among other nations which lived in the area among all the other semitic tribes of the day just like Arabs and Syrians and they lived as bandits attacking the trade caravans of the Babylonians and the Assyrians and this should explain to you why those nations were after them all the time and it should also explain to you why they different from other nations as tribes known as Jews did not have a civilization of their own even in the Israel they claim. No temples, no statues, no stadiums, no theaters as if they never lived there.

It's such a sad and pitiful existence the Jews are and all these sorts of religions really. Whether religious or ethnic, Jews are truly pitiful.

I agree that mainstream christian groups giving aid to shitskins should be abolished, there's plenty of people at home that could use the help/resources instead. Hypothetical question for you, if you could see one group killed off forever, which one would it be, Christians or Jews?

Me personally, I'm of the opinion that whites can have their petty squabbles over religions or lack thereof after we've won the global race war or at least get the hell off this planet and create a new suitable home.

And all of these occurred when Europe was most Christian
(Catholic in this case).

That's because Rome's faggot gods are more of a waste than Jesus. Fuck that shit.

It is the work of Christianity. The history of Christianity is a slow movement from paganism with Christian elements (early middle ages christianity), to purging more and more pagan elements (Protestantism), and then finally ending in pure christianity we see since the 19th century.

And Christians were the leading edge of abolitionism, of attempts at "civilizing" subhumans, of integration, of feminism, etc.

But why though, if they're similar what makes them shitty faggot gods?

...

lolwut (checked)

On Exodus, depends on how you interpret. It says "house of bondage", and many heebs following Moses actually hesitated midways and wanted to go back to Egypt. Moses had a lot of trouble to keep the momentum. Hence why 40 years stuck in the desert, and only younger generations were willing enough to get their patch of land.

Some hints in the text itself if the slavery was that horrible in Egypt they wouldn't hesitate so much and spend so much years wondering what to do.

So the slavery thing may be a modern pop culture thing. On scripture plenty of hints that while they didn't like Egypt, it wasn't bad enough to make them want to leave for good.

Jews of course. But if we get rid of Christians, then getting rid of Jews would be an easy next step. The only reason Jews are around today is because Christians protected them and gave them privileged social positions for hundreds of years. Every time there was a peasant revolt and they were killing Jews, the church would step in and "expel" the Jews to protect them from receiving their just punishment, allowing them to get away with their crimes. And then they would just allow the Jews back a few years later. That is why there were so many "expulsions" of the Jews and so few genocides.

...

What if most of the stories in the Old Testament are just made up bullshit the jews use to justify their actions? Make up a story about how God promised you the land of Canaan to justify killing off all the other inhabitants. Just like they made up the holocaust to drum up sympathy and convince Britain to give them Israel.

...

...

Christianity is a kike religion just like Islam.

All Christians must die along with leftists and non-whites.

The religion itself is peaceful. States and empires adopted it centuries after Christ as a way to solidify control over people, including for war.

Islam on the other hand is completely violent and it's whole purpose was to create an empire.

Do you think Multicultural Odinism or Multicultural Zues worship was as successful among shitskins as Christianity was?

Because I dont

Kill yourself Schlomo, nobody is going to buy into your kike religion.

I can think of a couple reasons (and if I'm wrong on any of this please correct me); For those wishing to go back or look more into the old religions, people tend to (or should) go with what their ancestry/bloodline is (and for most people on Holla Forums being German or fans of German/Nordic culture, it's not surprising to see Nordic paganism favored more here). However, as others have mentioned, with how Nordic culture is portrayed in the MSM and other sources, it gets people who don't even have a bit of Nordic blood or ancestral history to go with said culture, resulting in a bunch of LARPers, libtards, and cucks joining in just to spite Christianity (or more accurately, their parents and their way of life). For those with Pagan blood/ancestry, they could technically practice whichever one they like since they all stem from the indo-european religion, but ultimately, it's best to go with the one your family/ancestors followed.

Another reason is due to how some pagan religions got hit harder with their culture and teachings being subverted/destroyed by other religions and empires. One of the reasons Celtic culture is not as portrayed as much as Nordic culture for instance, is due to how a lot if not most of it's culture, religion, stories, and teachings were lost when the Romans went and killed the druids and bards (since they couldn't take on the Celts in a real fight head on) that kept and spread said information orally, passing it onto future druids/bards. This hurt the Celts over time since outside of rocks and metals, they had no written records of that information that inspired and guided them, resulting in a lot of their culture lost and what was written down was done by the Romans (and knowing how most cultures that write about outside cultures, they portrayed them as being more barbaric than they might've been). When Christianity came to the British isles and Ireland, what stories and teachings that remained (though more can/is being found) were recorded by them as well, albeit with Christianity's own "Flare" on the stories.

I myself, having Celtic ancestry and blood in me, am currently trying to learn more about Celtic culture/religion while siphoning out the bullshit Wiccans (leeching off of the culture and religion, giving people the wrong idea of what being a Celt is) and neo-pagans (with how they try to take out, ignore, or deny all the racist/misogynist parts of the culture when practicing it) put into it (which unfortunately all pagan religions have to endure as well). Though I am proud of it, I do my best not to brag about it, as I am still learning about it and have a lot more to learn about it. We probably have more Celts, Slavs, Romans, and Greeks here on Holla Forums as well, but are not as vocal about it unless brought up. It's been quite fascinating and fun to look into Celtic culture, and though it's not as overdone as Nordic culture, see how much of the culture has influenced a lot of other stories and videogames. I hope to one day visit where my ancestry used to be. Till then, I will keep learning more about it and honor the culture however I can.

THE LAST THING WHITES NEED RIGHT NOW IS A PEACEFUL FUCKING RELIGION

little g gods

Ding Ding Ding!
We have an almost entirely agreeable statement for all sides.
Good work user.

Nice references on that infographic there you dumbcuntshill

The Christianisation of Europe was mostly peaceful, with some bouts of violence from individual kings.

Don't forget. Roman and Greek Polytheism did tremendous damage to the Hebrews.

So they are afraid of playing that card. Celtic culture while interesting, is also barelly pushed here, reason being Christianity performed a lot of Syncretism with Celtic myths.

The Holy Grail for example. Or Celtic Cross and Christian Cross.

Don't think Christians won't turn over your table, money changer.

Kike, you don't deserve those dubs. Know this, your christkike kind will hang on dotr. The white race cannot survive without culling you weak minded jew slaves.

The Iranians seriously need to get back to worshiping Zoroaster or something. They can't just claim Persian pride and b& movies like 300 when they follow a semitic subhuman faith forced upon them by filthy Arab invaders. The entire Pisslamic Golden Age was entirely Persians and Greeks. There was no way on earth the low IQ inbred semites could have accomplished what they did. Do the right thing in the name of Zarathustra and Ahuramazda. Purge Islam and Judaism from the fertile crescent lands.

Zoroastrians don't worship Zoroaster; they worship Ahura Mazda.

Erhm, Persians conversian to Islam didn't change their genetics overnight. Decide yourself if you want dualism or not.

I think the flaw in your logic is that getting rid of Christians (white and non-white) will be easier than uniting all white people into a common reactionary cause that ends up finally wiping out the Jews. But hey, that's just like my opinion, man.

This shit posting is pointless, we're trying to discuss here.


Then make it Crusade again. Or accept the arabniggers and Islam I guess lel. I think there's a better chance of redirecting Christianity towards redpilling than attempting to outright get rid of it. Best thing I've noticed is show them the talmud and how kikes relish in Jesus' death and call mary a whore, that throws them for a loop.


does that matter when addressing a pantheon, it thought small g was the designated status

You're a dumb nigger. Widespread support for marxism has only begun in the 50s, right when the Jewish media started hounding Christianity and irreligion spiked in Europe.

You can shitpost as much as you want about how Christianity is "cucked", but there is a positive correlation with abandonment of Christianity and the decline of the west.

No you're trying to shill for a semitic slave religion that revolves around worshipping a kike.

Failed to bait.

there's always one guy that tries to threaten people on the internet lmfao. look here

just filter him dude

Agreed.

Also, this whole damned thread feels like D&C.

How much do they pay you filthy kikes? Go back to shill school, you are doing very poorly schlomos.

Your church is already dead, tard.

You came into this thread later than me and just stated yelling kike kike kike while we were actually talking, ya dumb kike.

We will never be able to remove semitic subversion until we remove semite, from our souls as well as from our lands. A semite-derived religion simply isn't the best of all options. Go be a christian if you must, but Holla Forums is a hurtbox for brutal and uncomfortable truths, and here, at least, you should expect that many of us will abuse you for it.

What I want to see is something like the Japanese have - a white Shinto put atop the theology of Mahayana Buddhism. It would be relatively easy to do and the Japanese have no difficulties with getting murdery in a pinch. The only problem is getting people to take the first redpill.

Christians even the unpozzed ones are breadpilled. Even the worries you show are too temporal and they look at such as "current epoch worries". A sort of right wing oliver.

But show them Talmud calling Mary a whore, Jesus boiling in excrement, and Jews celebrating Jesus torture and Death, and you will start waking up their inner Crusader and Inquisitor.

...

...

...

BTW the bigger problem is that you're taking their diversionary track. They're asking you to excuse their immorality today because your ancestor's may have been immoral centuries ago. Everyone involved in that is dead, there are no victims to protect or criminals to punish. There are victims of ISIS today and people to punish. If they care more about justice for the dead then protecting people today then they're perhaps the most immoral of all involved.

Lefties have canned arguments like this all the time, they should never be taken head on there purpose is diversion.

/thread

user, the problem is that growth is coming from Africa/Asia/South Central America. In other words, no Whites.

Buddhism is an Aryan religion.

I'm not saying it's easier. I'm saying it's a prerequisite. You simply are not going to rally christkikes to exterminate the chosen people of Yahweh. That said, it is easier. Hardly any whites are serious Christians anymore. At best they are cultural Christians, and the handful who are serious about it can easily be rounded up and gulaged along with their precious Jews and adopted niglets when the time comes.

80% of the world is shitskins. actually it's more like 86% iirc

"oh no, niggers adopted our culture when we forced them to convert. let's abandon our culture and let them have it."

Compared to the Borgias Papacy, Francis is a small worry in comparison.

You can always feel loyalty to Pope John Paul II or other previous Pope if you dislike current one. It's Papacy aproved.

To anyone educated that's pretty funny.

hmm….. might want to fix the whol "we're not reproducing" before making up some special snowflake religion for everyone

(((educated)))

Only in the Indo-European sense. Indo-Europeans are people of the past.

Also Buddha was from India. From Holla Forums standards, there would be pajeet and poo in the loo jokes sooner or later rather than Indo European aspect.

The nippos seem pretty cucked imo, they have no standing army and consume kawaii loli animu and mango instead while their sons become herbivores and their women screw around with alphas or foreign men. I'm not going to blame their religion on that though.

Besides like I said earlier essentially, you're better off trying to redpill them using their book or the talmud than trying to go on a global pogrom. All that wasted energy would be better spent on outright killing the root of the problem jews instead.

Sidenote: Isn't that similar to the plan for Positive Christianity.

Yeah, sure, Soviet Union didn't exist until the 50s. I forgot. Nazis weren't fighting commie rebellions and christkike subversion at all.

That said, most progressive causes in history were forwarded by Christians. In the USA, abolitionists were all fanatical christians. Early feminist suffragate groups in USA, continental Europe, and Britain were all hardline christian. Biggest groups opposing national socialists were all christian.

Positive Christianity won't work. The only thing that can get Christianity closer to Holla Forums ideas are the Talmud blaspheming Mary and Jesus.

NatSocs were revolutionaries, but in a different sense than the communists.
Christianity is reactionary. Of course it will be sceptical of revolutions.

Soviet Union was created by atheists, who had just as I said, dropped Christianity. Congrats on proving my point

there are two sides. Most of the pro slavery side was Christian. Most who opposed female sufferage were Christian. That's because the west was entirely Christian you massive retard.

durr why does everyone I see in a 99% Christian society turn out to be Christian

He had white skin and blue eyes - Buddha was from pre-poo era, at least with regards to the high mountains in which he lived.

The Catholic church isn't a religious organization. It's a Marxist third-worldist organization. If everything essential about the church has changed completely in the past 100 years, how can you say that it's the same church? Easy, it isn't. It doesn't resemble at all the church as it was 100 or 300 or 1000 years ago. Your church is dead.

...

And (((The West))) was built by (((Christians))) who dropped based paganism.

No pictures back then, and statues were often painted for religious reasons.

There are status of fat buddhas, fit buddhas, and starving buddhas.

Gee, who could be behind this post?

Makes no sense. Roman Empire rulers were most of them polytheist pagan. Christians had no hard power whatsoever and often killed even in spectacle.

You're basically blaming Christians for having been more sucessful than the pagans in converting people.

Blaming people for being sucessful.. reminds of SJWs and reason for anti-White movement.

I'm talking text accounts as well… and you do know those differing statues are of literally different people, right? The fat buddha isn't Siddhartha/Gautama.

Eugh. Let's not even go there, the only ones I see following Buddhism are actual Asian monks or vegetarian lolberals at uni that hate white people and themselves. It would take a monumental amount of time and resources to return Buddhism to it's original racial roots, besides doesn't that prove that Buddhism is cucked since no white are even seriously in it anymore.


That seems to be the best weapon (checked)

I'm saying it's retarded to import Asian religions made for Asians to solve the "White man problems".

At last you show your true colors.

...

Dubs confirms the missionary work for Holla Forums Christians.

Always count on Christkikes to parrot Jewish memes.

Fact is, our birth rates are fine. Whites naturally reproduce at a sustainable level. We aren't niggers who shit out kids we can't provide for. Jews use the birth rate argument to push for immigration, but they never say why we need a growing population to begin with. With increased automation, growing population just means we will have increased unemployment and lowered standard of living. Only christfags with nigger-tier IQs and Jews believe exponentially increasing population is a good thing.

Literally just as cucked as Francis.

And it isn't simply the Pope. Second Vatican council changed the fundamental doctrine of your church. The pre-1965 church no longer exists (and it was cucked before that anyway, but the council just made that explicit).

People really seem to forget that the National Socialist movement was built from WWI veterans who joined the patchwork of esoteric societies which had sprung up in the 19th century in response to an attempted takeover by Marxist groups during the weakness of the post-war era.


All those who worship a Semite and a Semitic deity while embracing the ideology responsible for the chaos of this era of Semitic hegemony are race traitors. Cucktianity is a Semitic religion the influence of which will inevitably lead to Semitic domination. Beyond all of that, it is also a false religion degenerated from the truth which Europoids brought to Semites through their colonization of the Middle East following the Younger Dryas. There are exactly zero reasons to accept the idea of Cucktianity as compatible with a European future when viewed in accordance with its origins and the impact it has had thus far. There would be no liberalism if not for Cucktianity weakening the soul of Europeans. There would be no Semitic hegemony if not for Christcucks accepting Semites as their masters. Christcucks are at fault for ALL of our problems relating to Semites.

Well John Paul II had the funny incident of getting 3 gunshots as an old man by a hired gun, and surviving. Just this by itself makes it worthwhile.

The religious followers thought it was a miracle such an old person recovered from that.
Was a huge morale loss to USSR (does Pope die if he is killed?). Maybe the weirdest assassination aftermath I can think of.

But yes Vatican II was the beginning of subversive movements inside the Church I won't dispute that.

Yet christkikes fully supported Weimar republic, which was much more "revolutionary" in the true sense than natsoc, which basically revived old essential Germanic principles in a new form (thereby being truly reactionary in the purest sense). The christkikes only started chimping out when national socialists took over, but we're complacent with global Jewry and anglo-kikes running roughshod over Germany. Hmmm really makes you think.

It's interesting because a lot of the same forces came together in the United States during the post-Civil War era, leading to things like Theosophy in pretty much exactly the same way. We did it with imageboards…

Erhm, go see what Semite actually means. Romans and Phoenicians are included.

It wasn't the beginning. It was like that for a long time prior.

fellow goy i applaud your (((honest)))

...

Why would christians support a communist revolution in Germany? At best they breathed in relief the jewish commie takeover failed, but Christian Germany would require Kaiser Wilhelm at the throne as head of state.

But they are included. This may be the best JIDF self sabotage ever.

I'll give you an answer since noone else wants to. If Holla Forums is attracted to north euro 'paganism', why is it a problem to you? I would understand your concern if people were DEMANDING you to worship Wotan, but otherwise my advice would be "If you want more interest in X, talk about X yourself"

Hopefully, religious beliefs won't be bound by this Abrahamic zero-sum game over controlling everyone's mindset in the future. I hope Whites can overthrow the demon YHWH and his evil progeny the Jews, and will choose the Old Ways of their people. Are you Italian? Here's a temple of Apollo. Celt? We got you covered. Slav? Meet Perun. Swede? Have a Mjollnir. I think your ethnic sensibilities will guide you to your religion, one that isn't Abrahamic. And I think there will be enough logic and reason in Europe to reach a consensus acknowledging the value of each European faith that peace and prosperity can be achieved. Call me naive.

...

There's a difference in attraction and exclusivity.

Celtic, Roman and Greek paganisms all had in common of messing with the Heebs.
Not the case of Nordic.

I think we might need to bring back regional gods, affixed to particular features of the natural landscape. That is, after all, how our ancestors did it. Considering that NatSoc is an environmentalist philosophy, that would help imbue the natural landscape with the sacredness it needs to give a moral impetus to convince people not to allow hyper-capitalists to despoil it. If such a thing were done, my town would be defined by a mountain that towers over it, and the local cult should be about that while also serving regional and national gods as well.

Honest question: Do you actually believe that Odin/Thor/Wotan, etc. actually exist?

That would make modern people not too different from the Native Americans.

what a fucking stupid question

False Analogy

Hope you're getting paid for this schlomo.

I always thought Miguel Serrano was more Holla Forumsack friendly.

Oh I'm well aware of that, which is why I'm researching it. Though I was raised on Christian values (though rather light, as my parents were more than aware of how corrupt and bad the Churches have gotten and are not against the pagan ways given our background), I want to separate and get clarification of what was part of Christianity and what was part of Celtic culture (which is turning out to be quite a lot), as having Celtic blood within me, I want to do my part to keep the culture and teachings alive and remembered for as long and best as possible.

Indeed. Actually this part of your post has got me thinking; How would the Celts, Nords, and Slavs have handled the Jews had the Greeks and Romans not dealt with them?

...

forgot sage

I read a couple chapters of Serrano and really liked it, but I have the attention span of a coked-up housefly and I haven't gotten back to it yet… I really should. Evola is… I got a degree in philosophy. I've done all that kind of reading I want to do for a lifetime. I'm not going to sit down and force-read something I'm not going to get anything out of because my heart isn't really in it. Serrano is much more digestible.

Eh, we saved it from shit and shill OP. This whole place is a wreck tonight - kampfy must be on vacation jerking off on whores.

Kill yourself Schlomo. Bump for awareness of how evil Christkikery is.

Except, wheeling your tracks was not a cunt. Shackle you boat checks or you might get vatium'd another meme.

? What you suggested is a form of religion animism/totemism not too different from native americans and shinto.

Nothing wrong said.

Learn to read ID's Schlomo.

I miss Tay.

Good question. Geographical distance made that confrontantion never happen I guess.

Is there a rule you can't make more than 10 posts in a loooong thread?

The strange currents of this electronic ocean do bear rather interesting similarities to the occult societies of the late 1800s and early 1900s. In some sense, we are really just waiting for Kalki to raise his banner.


It's a bit more complex than that, but there really isn't another option because the other options (Abrahamic nonsense and materialism) are bunk. What people haven't quite gotten yet is that those divine forces were attributed to particular features for a reason. All the Christcucks whining about how they destroyed our religious traditions and murdered our lorekeepers fail to realize that a religion based in the truth of this world does not need books to continue its legacy when that truth can be found in the world itself. Plus killing people doesn't stop you from contacting them, so we can still get guidance from those noble ancestors anyway.

...

It's hard to gain faith like that. Seeing is believing, and all I've seen is Egyptian God Kek's work. I hope my children will be able to appreciate the archetype that is Wotan, and give that God the respect it deserves, but I'm not Nordic so if I were to try to dabble in Nordic beliefs, it'd be pure LARPing, and in bad taste.

...

Yes. I support this.

Not even nordics actually believed that Odin/Thor/Wotan existed. Unlike Christkikes they had high enough IQ to recognize metaphor.

OP was a shill one. Early christians were a persecuted sect, not a warrior caliphate.

Is having a chat in a thread on Holla Forums on religion forbbiden? Is this the last resort of the defeated kike?

The Holla Forums consensus which the based mods agree with is that only Kekism and Paganism are okay, the rest is kike bullshit. Sorry but Christkikes are going to hang on DOTR.

I will not abide by Materialism. I do believe in higher powers that are more than metaphor.

Ehh…. believing that Odin """really""" exists doesn't necessarily mean believing he's a corporal human. You should really read this Jung essay.
ahistoryofthepresentananthology.blogspot.com/2013/03/wotan-by-carl-jung-1934.html
I don't see why Odin shouldn't be real. It's just a question of what we mean by real. You, yourself, perceive yourself as a single unitary entity, yet in truth you're a network of tens of millions of cells, alien bacteria, the food you eat and the air you breathe. There's a sense in which "you" are strictly a myth. In the same way Odin is a myth and yet 100% real at the same time.

We've been getting ready for that for 2000 years, but a much more hardcore thing than DOTR.

Kekism is 'paganism'

Kekism is the only true religion. Only kikes and shills disagree, and they're going to die on dotr.

The funny thing is Kek would fit perfectly well into Mahayana Buddhist cosmology. Mahayanists fucking love gods, they'll take everything you've got.

Kekism is Egyptian Polytheism though.
So Holla Forums is ok with a North African Religion?

You mean the traitorous cowardly faggot who was content to watch his nation devoured by Jewish vultures? He wasn't fit for the title. Hereditary monarchy is a degeneration of traditional Germanic practices anyway, introduced by antiteaditional revolutionary christkikes.

Egypt was white you fucking kike.

Zero-sum Monotheism is Abrahamic trash. Kek is One of Eight Gods in the Ogdoad, which in turn is the portions of the soul of an even greater God that is also just part of a larger pantheon.

...

>Hahah checkmate suckers, I just shot myself in the foot like an actual nigger pretending to have a 5th grade reading comprehension level
Lurk forever, faggot

Sorry egypt was neither niggers nor nordics. Deal with it.

I kind of wish he had responded again. I wanted to see him explain how an illiterate Egyptian Arab managed to write a classical Coptic translation of a collection of classical Greek texts, fabricate their age, and then burn a quarter of them for kindling for a lark before selling the rest to a half-dozen separate antiquities collectors for a pittance.

sargon you fucking cuck just end yourself

This is because egyptoids are the problem. Nogs kiking it up with no end in sight.

No they believed they existed.

...

Something moderns don't understand is that our ancestors didn't distinguish a statue or painting of a god from that god themselves. If nothing else, the idols collectively served as the bodies of their gods.


Education: you need one.

Ancient Egypt of millenia years ago whatever they were it was neither nordics, niggers, or anglo saxons (the anglo saxon mix didn't even exist by then).

Probably some genetic that adapted to the climate of the time, which could've been less desertic than thought during time of the pyramids and before punic wars, but to claim white as in WASP/Nordic makes no sense.

(((education)))

You're out of your element here CIAnigger.

Infidel detected.

Completely ignore northren crusades because the truth is inconvenient for christians when they try to portray themselves as victims. I also like how he ignored the crusades in iberia.

If you want to have a discussion about classical antiquity, actually having a university-level education in it really does help. I'll admit it was a waste of money, but I learned a hell of a lot.

I hope you're trolling, or you're on the left part of the IQ normal distribution curve.

I know for a fact that you are a TRShill.

Nobody said Egyptians were Nordic or Aryan. They said Egypt was White.

L.O.L. Look at this salty user. right here.

White is code word for Anglo Saxon or Similiar.

Not if you practice intermedial catholicism, you disgusting fedoracuck.

These are the people who feel in charge lol

White is code for Europoid

wat.

D&C

Irish are white
Hungarian are white
Spaniards are white
Italians are white
etc.

We know your trick Schlomo.

Wrong.

Do you guys really believe the nordics/anglo saxons were egyptian kangs or I'm being trolled?

...

...

Regardless, North Africa =/= Europe. Need I upload a mediterranean map?

You fucking idiot, lurk moar. This has been fleshed out and discussed in exhaustive detail dozens of times here

Fed or genuine newfag? This is fascinating.

Another fantastic contribution from the TORpedo


Wow, what a fucking weak response. And Christians still claim to have saved Europe. If anything, it was the mongols whom saved Europe from Islam.

I guess Americans aren't white because they don't live in Europe huh?

You fucking shillbot.

You really belive europeans were egyptian kangs?
That's literally same doctrine the blacks push.

Ancient egypt is ancient. The european races of back then were likely different from the ones of today.

...

Dude, if you're a newfag, please just admit it straight out so that we inform you rather than relentlessly ridicule you for not having any idea what's going on around you right now.

America is made of European settlers. Do you need a map with ship travel routes?

You CIAniggers created the WE WUZ KANGZ meme in order to push this exact narrative.

YOU WILL FUCKING DIE YOU FUCKING BASTARDS

...

Just say if you really believe europeans were egyptian kangs or if massive trolling

Because even if egyptian kangs were "white", it was such ancient times european races of back then would be different of later times

You'll never get any better at this, because your IQ stands out as significantly lower than that of the active userbase. We'll always know when you're posting, just like we always know when women post.
You're a fucking embarrassing piece of trash, KYS faggot
Before you get rolled up in a pedo sting with the rest of you goons

...

Wew.

Shit, even my high school history teacher who was as bible-thumping as it got was awakened to the fact that early christians used propaganda. How he could still bible-thump and know that christians were subversive is a living example of doublethink amongst christians.


They were as persecuted as any other cult, which is to say, not - except for when they cross the line and piss off someone. The main difference with christianity is that it literally invented its stories of persecution. Martyrdom was nothing but propaganda, invented to bolster support and to do the time-tested jewish tactic of inventing a victim complex upon themselves and using it as a tool of subversion and a shield from criticism. Early christians were jewish. Because of that, their rise to the top in the end of the roman empire is (((pure coincidence.)))

Therein lies the confusion people have when disentangling the subversion that is Christianity. The core of Christianity is contained as a jewish cult and they used subversive tactics to permeate beyond the boundaries of the fall of rome and into europe. After creating the catholic church and then creating the (((jesuit))) order, they went about establishing a new cult which became Islam. A jesuit from the 90s spilled the beans on this and confirmed what early redpilled people suspected, that all 3 semitic cults are related. In essence, the crusades was a battle that jews played both sides of. Once the muslims were repelled, the semites in the catholic church got what they wanted, a standing army. Using that army, they took them north and started forcibly converting masses that resisted subversion. When europe was taken over they almost cemented their control and would have had it if it weren't for monarchs and luther.

The point is that like any (((semitic))) religion, it is mutable. It is whatever it needs to be when the time calls for a change in tactics. Christianity has done nothing for europe except tagged along in the ride to pre-modern times. In the modern age its newfound strategy is to spread cuckoldry in all aspects of life so as to let Islam have a new turn at a caliphate.

Weebposter btfo once again.

Apparently you're too new to have seen any of the months long threads wherein we've discussed Europoid mummies found across the globe, including Egypt, or the other artifacts relating to the pre-Younger Dryas European civilization and its legacies following the cataclysm.

Wasn't Gautama a prince or some other high-caste heir?
If so, he was definitely Aryan

The CIA just put him on the job, he'll warm into it once he gets enough MkULTRA.

...

After Trump victory, this became controlled opposition and it shows. I came today out of boredom for nostalgia for elections.


Ptolemaic Dynasty was conquered by Alexander the Great. Much after the Pyramid time which was millenia years ago.


Thanks for the only coherent reply. Not everyone browses Holla Forums as if it was a job everyday.


Where's my paycheck then? CIA is going bankrupt?

Yes, a prince, and of a mountain kingdom. Like the Druze and Yazidi, mountainous regions manage to stave off barbarian mixing for much longer, so I fully believe that Gautama is as described - fair skinned and blue eyed.


Okay, nice naming things that came twelve centuries later.

b-b-buh goy races were TOTALLY DIFFERENT BACK THEN TO WHAT THEY ARE NOW

blonde haired whites didn't exist until recently m'gentile!

[citation needed]

That's good evidence unlike the chimping out in previous posts "we wuz kangs" white team version.
Regardless, blonde hair can be found in several places of the globe.

But yeah I can give a discount given the amount of race mixing and multiculti propaganda you got bombarded with for the last decades or so.

Kill yourself kike

Tell me more, furfaggot

You legit know next to nothing about the history of the Arabs, I see.

I'll take being called as a CIA agent as a flattery. I'm just a bored hobbyist who got a day off and found a bad enough OP to troll some JIDF posters and I never cared much about Holla Forums theories on pharaohs.

...

t. 4gag

Should be on Jerry Springer not Holla Forums tbh. Come back when your IQ is 20 points higher.

weebposter rekt even harder lmao


rofl. Proto-indian arabs and and mameluks where the first and last egyptian dynasties, prove me wrong or get rekt.

better get another proxy you freech goon

because you're getting banned soon

You really shouldn't, but there you go again showing off that double-digit IQ. Enoy the $5 you made from (((you)))s

Look Holla Forums is about a lot of important things and many different people come here.

If my main worry in life was to figure out ethnicity of pharaohs, Holla Forums wouldn't be first thing on the list, I would join some archeology group instead, sorry for the honesty.

They aren't even Holla Forums theories, we're just reposting shit we get from others.

We were Buddhas and shit.
Pic related

lmao

(((Archaeology)))
(((Egyptology)))


I've been talking about classical antiquity. The early and pre-dynastic periods are lost causes to talk about; the history has been so muddled - or straight up invented out of whole cloth - that there are no real sources to appeal to. By the time the Maleluks got in there's no point talking about it because they'd already been BLACKED by shitskins culturally anyway. Even the relative handful of native Coptic speakers aren't a real enduring element of classical Egyptian legacy.

Your posts make up 1/7 of this entire Thread. You don't sound like a normal poster and you remind me of a shill who spent slightly more than five minutes studying the board

Erhm alright, but main atraction Holla Forums offers is redpills, happenings, wikileaks, lugenpress, list goes on.

If History is your thing Holla Forums isn't first thing on the list. Simple as that. But if this qualifies as "CIA", then the guys are better hidden than you think.

Violent christians is a myth created by the joos.

Go back to freech you dirty smelly jew.

Holla Forums is created by the j00s too.

...

LOL praise kek.

No, they're actually fucking not–thus our unanimous derision of both them and you. You really are one stupid motherfucker. Maybe almost stupid enough to actually be a CIAnigger

Are you pretending to be retarded or do you actually believe that?

Can we just say fuck Christianity and Paganism? Neither are applicable in a modern society. We should instead figure out a way for an unpozzed religion of the masses to take hold. Perhaps by gutting Christianity and filling it with racial and moral overtone, and traditional European stories.

lmao and whites are supposed to be smart? top kek


meant to quote

KKKekism is the only answer.

I've been on chans since 2005 (believe whatever you want) abundant signs Holla Forums has become controlled opposition.

Yep, neither do have the patterns of a shill.

Yes it can happen someone bored find internet discussion entertaining from dialy stress. What a shocker.

It's esoteric in nature, it's not for every member of society to practice.

you're doing a really bad job of this jew, you'll hang on dotr mark my words kike

Wait for the next ancient Aryan thread. I probably should have saved the infographics but so many other people were so on top of it I didn't think to.

What an original idea

We'll just kill the unneeded members of society on dotr anyway.

Only newfags claim to be oldfags to give them a step up in an argument. And learn how to type English properly no wonder I though something was off with you.

Faggot, the bible teaches you that you reap what you sow. Your pagan shit is weak and your rules just change with the tide.

Hitler dubs confirm Kek as a Bodhisattva of racial enlightenment.

Which chan was the first one you used?

lmao


lmao

Reported

You realize typo correctors do exist right? I can just turn it on.

Reminds of the pic "heh almost forced to admit you had a point but I see you made a type too bad more luck next time fella".

because the doctrine is always in dispute. can you imagine if the Church remained the same for the entirety of its existence, and still taught 3rd Century doctrine?

You'll be laughing all the way into the ovens goon. We will make your death slow and painful.

I agree because the exact image of what pagans were is buried under centuries of christian propaganda and historical revisionism. What we do know about actual paganism is so minute that you would have to invent a religion around it anyway but trying to be a pagan without knowing any of that will lead you to LARPing which is what most pagans are. Very few do it right but saying they do it right is the same as saying they do nothing at all.

That's not going to work because it's already been tried. Bible-thumping conservatives are basically that and use the religion as a cornerstone that seriously needs to be replaced the next time they do foundation repair, if you catch my drift. If there's any kind of modern religion that would be Holla Forums-tier, it would need to emphasize race-realism by default. Morality in and of itself is something that comes from genes and teaching it is basically awakening those genes to what amounts to common sense. The myth that christianity teaches that is nothing more than a myth as christian-morality classes just use jesus stories as a springboard to something almost wholly irrelevant - not very unlike a rabbi quoting the talmud as authority.

Yeah the world would probably be white, that's a scary thought I'm shaking in fear.

Praise kek.


lmao

Wew.

If paganism was codified and spent a thousand years being practiced by majority groups it would be a lot stronger and the rules wouldn't change.

k

The ovens just got 10 feet taller goon.

You don't seem to understand, the truth about history is the biggest redpill there is. Europoids are responsible for ALL civilization on this planet through colonization of shitskins following the near-extinction events of the Younger Dryas. And when you start to get into the spiritual aspects of the matter, the importance becomes even more apparent.

An obvious example of this is how Christcucks attempt to denigrate our ancestors as barbarians who needed Cucktianity to become civilized despite civilization having been the invention of Europoids whose traditions were directly upheld by pre-Cucktian pagans.

lmao


rekt

Didnt the catholics tell the nords that yeah all that thor stuff already happened and adam and eve were the survivors of ragnarock or something of that nature?

lmao

No it's because you have no point you faggot anyone can look at your posts and see what bullshit you're spewing.
Whoever thought it was a good idea to send you in here was an idiot and should be fired. And so should you.

This nigga actually think he's making a point that anyone who has been on Holla Forums more than 3 months wouldn't see through. Jews think they're smart.

We know your tricks goon.

Holla Forums lost, and we won.

Meme Magickkk is all poweful, you will die soon.

You can oy vey all the way to the ovens Schlomo.

lmao

That's what some of them did. Some were forcibly converted and some were subverted with tricks like that. Catholics invented a new myth that basically and heavily implied that all the stuff they believed was a prequel to the old testament. It's as blatant as that. They took advantage of the fact that myths were still word of mouth and just invented a myth to make both compatible, which is what they did next with taking pagan rituals and adopting them.

We're going to kill you along with everyone to the left of Holla Forums on DOTR kike, RWDS will have no mercy on you goonkike.

P-p-p-prove it, you dumb goy!
Please don't stop replying.
Please don't stop embarrassing yourself.

Shouldn't it be "The ovens just got 10 degrees hotter"?

I said here because I was bored.
A few people chimping out because I said egyptians millenia of years ago may have had different ethnic composition from europoids today made no sense.
You do realize Holla Forums has many things to offer, and it's not mandatory to be interested in all of them at the same time.

lmao


lmao

...

Enjoy your controlled opposition.

I just sacrificed an animal to Kek, he will DESTROY you soon goonkike.

lmao


lmao

It's like they think we don't know when shills are shilling shills.

Forgot mandatory reaction cheetah.

lmao

'They NEVER learn
You do realize this is like my 15th year of fighting you kikes online, and I have become exceedingly efficient at it - right?

gibberish, and I thought I would have a meaningful discussion for once.

The issue is most whites, because of (((England))) are more atheist than christian.

Fuck man that's pathetic

Atheism teaches science as a god, and we need to conserve resources, so goys don't have too many kids!
Where the bible says the world will end at the rapture, so be as fruitful as possible - reproduce!

Ban evading faggot

...

Those kikes are just weasels putting up with Christianity as long as it serves their ends. But in Israel, they don't even use the plus sign in arithmetic because it resembles a cross. The word kike, too, was derived from their hatred of the cross symbol. Illiterate immigrants from Europe would sign their names at the customs with a cross, but kikes signed it with a circle instead, and the Yiddish word 'kikel' for it evolved into kike.

Just keep waiting and maybe just stop acting autistic so it can happen Goldbergstein

The issue is the main stream (((TV preachers))). The actual bible needs to be taught. 90% of Christians have never read it. Just show them the book of Titus - its like one page - easy read. And start teaching the doctrine of reprobate.

This thread just goes to prove something I've believed for a long time -

Holla Forums is a breakaway civilization.

Get another VPN goon, I reported this one.

You can quote and reply to as many people as you want per post. I'm sure your jewish bible has all the answers they want you to have even though the historical context is better understood as (((christians))) of that era directly competing with jews. This is why you will always be a delusional hypocrite. The text is fully understood as jews of that era writing their thoughts. You will continue to flimsily and selectively quote from a jewish text such as this, even though the jew god is addressing his jew readers and telling them to have lots of jews - especially since that text comes from a text still recognized by jews.

You mean "Holla Forums".

Found the (((enemy)))
Sustainable! Enviro Fag.

Kike

It spread naturally, in war and in peace. It advanced by the blood of the martyrs and the repentance of Kings

It spread (((naturally))) like AIDS spreads naturally.

why would you even save that image you freak?

It's fucking fake you cuck.

Whatever you say Schlomo

And remember that mohammedans are traditionally considered christian heretics, not followers of a separate religion. So christkikes protected Europe from another branch of christkikes.

Everything good about Christianity is a result of being practiced by White Europeans.
If it remained in the desert, it would be indistinguishable from Islam and Judaism

you could say the same thing about viking raping and killing monks and christian women. Every people group and religion that is still around today had to fight for its survival at some point. Its just Christianity is a religion of peace that can still wage a Just War.

Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
which describes Christ as the victor over
Satan, played a central part in the spread of Christianity among the Vikings. pg 97 ww w.arkeologi.uu.se/digitalAssets/80/a_80440-f_Sanmark2004_OPIA34.pdf
(((They))) have subverted the religion. The KJV bible needs to be preached for what it actually says.

Everything good about White Europeans is falsely attributed to Christianity by historical revisionists. Europeans just happened to be Christians, being Christians did not fundamentally change much at all.

Thanks for the salt, Anons.! Right on schedule to. You've outdone yourself.

Geez guys, what happened?

seriously, wew lads

Kill yourself kikeshill. We're on to your tricks Schlomo, a noose is prepared for your kike neck.

Europe under pagans was a shit hole just as bad as the mudslime countries today. Many pagan tribes scarified virgins to their gods and believed that plants and animals gave them powers. Pagan faggots

Haha holy shit, is it THAT salty? I havent even read the whole thread, user. I'm about to archive it, never seen anything like it.

Nice disinfo you fucking kike faggot.

Maybe that's because you're new to Holla Forums you fucking D&C kike shillbot. Fuck you CIAnigger.

If it were truly the one true apostolic Church as they claim, then it would have. What was true then is true now. That they have changed so drastically, even on very essential and foundational matters, proves that they are liars.

They played both sides. The full story of the crusades is a story of jews exercising the ability to send goyim after war with a distant relative and profit from it. The jesuits created Islam.


The only war it ever carried out was one arranged by the church that dominated the religion of its time. How exactly is that a "Just War?"

That too

I'm pretty sure everywhere was a shithole, pagan or not.

Hi FBI

The Semitic baby is exactly the reason the bath water has to be thrown out. There is NOTHING acceptable in Cucktianity because the absolute core of the religion is corrupt.

The FBI are Holla Forums's greatest allies you CIAnigger, your tricks don't work here.

i havent even read the thread because i dont bother with
a) responding to a spoonfeed me thread
b) dealing with christcuckery shitshow

that being said you need to shut the fuck up. Calling someone a kike is reserved for when they are being a kike, not when they disagree with you. What is he saying that makes him a kike? hes pointing out, rightly, that this is a shit thread and should have been gassed before it hit 20 replies.

the overbearing wording of your reply suggests two options, you are either a turbo autist who needs to go outside and make make himself better as a white and a man instead of staring at a computer screen, or a non genuine poster thats throwing all the Holla Forums buzzwords he knows for jews into one post.

either way kill yourself tbqh fam

The KJV bible is not mutable. But (((they))) print new versions to subvert Christians. And they subvert Christians in other ways with false pastors… But if Christians actually read the KJV Bible, ((( they ))) would not be so happy, and Christians would be reproducing good stock!

Your fantasy religion would be subverted so fast and probably much worse than (((they))) have to Christianity. The KJV Bible can't be changed.

Unfortunately we will never know if that's true or not because christians were constantly spreading disinformation about what the pagans, the native europeans, were like and how they lived.

Reminder that christcucks sending money to apefrica and pretending that niggers are human means that cheetahs will very likely go extinct in the next few decades, along with rhinos. Thanks rabbi Jesus.

Kill yourself Schlomo, you fucking kike piece of shit. You will die on dotr.

What the fugg??? Either your ass got bamboozled or you gotta get laid. Seriously, I dont care if you're an alphabet, a kike or just an autismo, you have the biggedt reserve of salt on earth.

archive.is/hnOGO

...

It was Rome, Egypt and Greece that were the most advanced civilizations. Not pagans, they were too busy killing each other and fighting amongst themselves for centuries, until the Romans kicked their asses which was a good thing because they finally united and raided Rome which had become decadent and in debt. Learn about our history you fucking dimwit pagan wanabe.

HOL THE FUCK UP
Are you pretending to be me user? Is that why namecallinganon is so salty?
Do yu not check ID's anymore, anons?
wuz going on, is it shemitah or something?

Desiring with supreme ardor, as pastoral solicitude requires, that the catholic faith in our days everywhere grow and flourish as much as possible, and that all heretical depravity be put far from the territories of the faithful, we freely declare and anew decree this by which our pious desire may be fulfilled, and, all errors being rooted out by our toil as with the hoe of a wise laborer, zeal and devotion to this faith may take deeper hold on the hearts of the faithful themselves.

It has recently come to our ears, not without great pain to us, that in some parts of upper Germany, as well as in the provinces, cities, territories, regions, and dioceses of Mainz, Ko1n, Trier, Salzburg, and Bremen, many persons of both sexes, heedless of their own salvation and forsaking the catholic faith, give themselves over to devils male and female, and by their incantations, charms, and conjurings, and by other abominable superstitions and sortileges, offences, crimes, and misdeeds, ruin and cause to perish the offspring of women, the foal of animals, the products of the earth, the grapes of vines, and the fruits of trees, as well as men and women, cattle and flocks and herds and animals of every kind, vineyards also and orchards, meadows, pastures, harvests, grains and other fruits of the earth; that they afflict and torture with dire pains and anguish, both internal and external, these men, women, cattle, flocks, herds, and animals, and hinder men from begetting and women from conceiving, and prevent all consummation of marriage; that, moreover, they deny with sacrilegious lips the faith they . received in holy baptism; and that, at the instigation of the enemy of mankind, they do not fear to commit and perpetrate many other abominable offences and crimes, at the risk of their own souls, to the insult of the divine majesty and to the pernicious example and scandal of multitudes. And, although our beloved sons Henricus Institoris and Jacobus Sprenger, of the order of Friars Preachers, professors of theology, have been and still are deputed by our apostolic letters as inquisitors of heretical pravity, the former in the aforesaid parts of upper Germany, including the provinces, cities, territories, dioceses, and other places as above, and the latter throughout certain parts of the course of the Rhine; nevertheless certain of the clergy and of the laity of those parts, seeking to be wise above what is fitting, because in the said letter of deputation the aforesaid provinces, cities, dioceses, territories, and other places, and the persons and offences in question were not individually and specifically named, do not blush obstinately to assert that these are not at all included in the said parts and that therefore it is illicit for the aforesaid inquisitors to exercise their office of inquisition in the provinces, cities, dioceses, territories, and other places aforesaid, and that they ought not to be permitted to proceed to the punishment, imprisonment, and correction of the aforesaid persons for the offences and crimes above named. Wherefore in the provinces, cities, dioceses territories, and places aforesaid such offences and crimes, not without evident damage to their souls and risk of eternal salvation, go unpunished.

(1/2)

We therefore, desiring, as is our duty, to remove all impediments by which in any way the said inquisitors are hindered in the exercise of their office, and to prevent the taint of heretical pravity and of other like evils from spreading their infection to the ruin of others who are innocent, the zeal of religion especially impelling us, in order that the provinces, cities, dioceses, territories, and places aforesaid in the said parts of upper Germany may not be deprived of the office of inquisition which is their due, do hereby decree, by virtue of our apostolic authority, that it shall be permitted to the said inquisitors in these regions to exercise their office of inquisition and to proceed to the correction, imprisonment, and punishment of the aforesaid persons for their said offences and crimes, in all respects and altogether precisely as if the provinces, cities, territories, places, persons, and offences aforesaid were expressly named in the said letter. And, for the greater sureness, extending the said letter and deputation to the provinces, cities, dioceses, territories, places, persons, and crimes aforesaid, we grant to the said inquisitors that they or either of them joining with them our beloved son Johannes Gremper, cleric of the diocese of Coonstance, master of arts, their present notary, or any other notary public who by them or by either of them shall have been temporarily delegated in the provinces, cities, dioceses, territories, and places aforesaid, may exercise against all persons, of whatsoever condition and rank, the said office of inquisition, correcting, imprisoning, punishing and chastising, according to their deserts, those persons whom they shall find guilty as aforesaid.

And they shall also have full and entire liberty to propound and preach to the faithful word of God, as often as it shall seem to them fitting and proper, in each and all of the parosh churches in the said provinces, and to do all things necessary and suitable under the aforesaid circumstances, and likewise freely and fully to carry them out.

t. white-hating pope of a religion that loves killing europeans

(2/2)

Hello delusional christian. You do know what mutable means, right? Aside from that the KJV is a fancy and newer translation from the original bible which was written in Greek. It is definitively mutable because it was altered to be what it is.

Oh I am sure they would be as ecstatic as you are adding exclamation points and everything if they read that particular translation. Just imagine how inexplicably happy they would be to read a bible in your particular translation.

What fantasy religion? Just because I am exposing the subversion that christianity most certainly is does not mean I am advocating for one in its place. I am against any and all jewish tricks and christianity just so happens to be the most elaborate and long-lasting one there is, which for some reason you appear to advocate for on Holla Forums of all places.

How do you know it was disinfo?

Uhh Jesuits didn't exist then

Kek, alright now its pretty funny, its like Eddie Murphy's RAW only replace kike with every swear word.
Also, read this post

see

Goons are the saddest, fattest, most pathetic losers on the internet. No matter how many communities they fail trying to shit up their parents will never love them.

Yeah, christianity has always been anti-white.

Thats not what happened. Christianity was adopted around 300 a.d. by const. Rome was already weak and had no christian values at that point. Christianity did not cause the collapse of Rome it merely replaced it and entered Greece where later they fought off the mudslimes.

Hold up, part 2.
user, why do you call me shillkike, I just got into the thread?? Pls read ID.
I was just suprised that a simple discussion caused +500 replies

...

I see your point. Im very interested in the demise of those civilis. (Mind you im not the user you replied to) (Also holy shit 88 UIDs and almost 500 replies, kikes on full force)

The amount of disinfo created by christians from is on par with jewish tales of the holohoax. Christians tasked with converting parts of europe essentially competed with one another on who could tell the tallest tale of how pagans, which I remind you were native europeans of varying white backgrounds, lived and how and what they worshiped. The tales are so bizarre and exaggerated that they will remind you of the levels of hyperbole that jews invented when talking of their time in concentration camps. It's so exaggerated and false that even if a few were true, it cannot be verified because they muddied the whole topic so that no one would know the truth on how native europeans lived and what/how they worshiped.


You're somehow skipping the part that the point of adoption does not equate to it entering in existence within Rome. Christianity existed in Rome before it was adopted. Its presence in Rome (((coincides))) with its eventual fall. Christianity is a symptom of jewish infiltration and as those christians were in and of themselves jewish, they were essentially just a different sect of jew. Jewish involvement is a harbinger of doom for whatever civilization allows it in, going back to the times of Babylon. Christianity then was as jewish as any other jew cult at the time, competing with the rest and eventually overtaking the others because it continued the (((story))) of their people with Rabbi Yeshua.

No, Rome and most of the Mediterranean was quite prosperous, The Norse were still recovering from the last Ice Age, which isn't anything bad, they were survivors but still uncivilized ones.

This really exemplifies how even "doos vult" fags aren't fighting for an of us. Even this militant version of cuckstianity isn't fighting for a people. It's just concerned with spreading its cancer. It's semetic globalism that would combine us into some mullato mass.

I also got one about how Joan of Arc was actually a she-male devil worshipper if you'd like it.

meant for

CHRISTIANITY IS INSUFFICIENT TO MEET THE PARADIGMS OF MODERNITY

It's one thing to preach universality and life-rejection when geological divisions prevent said values from manifesting but in a world where modern forms of transportation exist and the internet reaching to all corners of the globe allows all of the pajeets and chinks and niggers from nigger africa to see what the first world is like it and our (((enemies))) are in an excellent position to use this attitude is nothing short of inviting self-immolation. Unfortunately this universality is fundamental to Christianity and so to meet the needs of Europeans now and in the future Christianity must either immediately reform itself into something that would no longer even be more than superficially Christian (ex. Christian Identity) or perish and leave a vacuum to be filled by a more appropriate system of belief. There are any number of metaphysical, theological, philosophical, historical and other discussions to be carried out, but I purposefully did not concern myself with them to keep the scope of this post contained.

proof?

...

How ironic is it that people without an argument rely on the "not an argument" meme as their last desperate defense? Protip: If you're going to post not an argument you yourself should have one to go with it. If you're missing a rebuttal after being rebutted, you yourself should be taking the meme as a sign that you have no argument.

The goon who cared too much.

Jews were not powerful in Rome, they had no money. It was roman degeneracy that destroyed Rome. Jesus Christ was not a Jew he was the first christian and more to the point he is God, he called the Jews the children of Satan because when they were in Babylon they adopted Satanic Talmudian rituals. There is a difference between Judea and Israel. Judea is where we get the actual word "Jew" meaning: from Judea. Go look it up.

that's not called being true, just willful stubbornness and ignorance - many religions died this way. just as theology evolves and develops, so is the teachings of the Church. although some things may never change, like the Holy Trinity or the Pope as the Vicar of Christ.

A translation is not mutable. Look up the definition of "translation".
Your religion, your belief system, your values, your weak unstable foundation of moral decisions.
I agree Christianity has been subverted, in the churches with weak pastors, on the TV with messed up doctrine like the Jews are God's chosen people, but the why good people need to go to church and stand up to the weak pastors. The KJV Bible is solid and can't be changed, and if followed would destroy all (((enemies))).
I advocate on Holla Forums because the religion is attacked here, yet you people hate (((them))), and the KJV bible is the best defense.

It wasn't peaceful but pointing to the crusades as proof shows you're completely ignorant/indoctrinated as to what that was about.

youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y#t=2m45s

Yes yes. He wasn't actually a jew he was just called jewish. He was really a 6'7" aryan man who could walk on water, raise zombies, turn water into wine and was the product of a virgin birth.

The only way this will happen is to get good strong men going to church and not letting the preacher preach weak liberal bull shit that's not found in the KJV Bible.

Nothing more then Kike propaganda to deny the fact that she was a powerful Christian Woman who became a saint in "Muh Ebil-Ages"….

One can never be free from Semitic influence while worshiping a Semite and a Semitic deity. Cucktianity is part of the enemy force, and Christcucks who choose Yeshua over the truth of nativist traditions are race traitors. Cucktianity has not been subverted, it is itself Semitic subversion and will always be as such. The absolute cuckoldry seen today from the pope and other Cucktian leaders is accurate to the teachings of Yeshua, further showing how it is a religion incompatible with Europeans.

If Jesus is God then he is not a Jew or an Aryan.

Well, hey. You said it not me.

So he wasn't actually flesh either. Just a ghost that splugred out of Mary's snatch. I guess that means he could fly and walk through walls as well.

...

You're just making excuses for your false Jewish church. Fundamental doctrines have been changed, but apparently that doesn't matter to christkikes. You can just pilpul around it with your Talmudic Jewish logic. Truth is relative, right Shlomo?

Is God jewish you piece of shit? Also back then (((They))) weren't the disgusting hooked nosed gremlin faced little demons we see everywhere today.
KING DAVID HAD RED HAIR.

...

I see youuuuuuuu

Rabbi Yeshua was a jew who got bored working in his dad's carpentry shop and took up the common habit of jewish cult worship, the one he created was a messianic cult built around himself. How convenient. Many jewish cults were started around that time because fooling other jews to follow them meant free food and sometimes free prostitutes.
I'm sure he had a complete history of going back to Babylon even if that did happen and not because that was a common thing to say when defaming others.
That doesn't change anything. Jews are rats but at least actual rats can be easily dealt with. Rabbi Yeshua was a jew, is a jew, and did what many jews did back then. He was just more successful than John the crazy bog jew.


Reading comprehension. The text is mutable because it has been altered through many translations and most importantly it is commonly left up to interpretation. Your favorite flavor of the same old text is just the one that appeals to you the most because it says what you want the old text to say when in reality it is missing its closest and most approximate historical context.

Were you going to finish that sentence?

It is subversion.
You're somehow missing the part where it is one of the most commonly used and popular of all translations of the (((bible))). It would not change anything because it hasn't changed anything and most importantly not one christian sect has ever followed their bible to the letter because in it it contains many contradictory things -all to telling of jewish storytelling and penmanship- and because interpretation is more popular. You will never have consistency amongst all churches because the preacher/priest/reverand will use the text as a springboard. What exactly are you thinking when you believe that that particular translation of that jew text is going to somehow beat jews at their own game?

You advocate on Holla Forums for a religion made by (((them))). That says everything.

Yeah sure, the ancient Hebrews were good boys dindu nuffin, getting their life back on track jus needed more shekels fo them progrems.

Read the story of David and Goliath and then try to tell me with a straight face that David wasn't a subhuman kike. You can't do it, because he obviously was.

Yeah because Jews never have red hair…

stop fucking around like a kike.
If Jesus is God like he claimed to be and his harshest words were towards jews, who then killed him, why do you still believe he wasn't 'ourguy' ? Because you have been fed anti christian lies all your life and were taught to hate Jesus.

You seem to have either missed the import of my post or fundamentally disagree with it.

What's the matter goon, does the smug sting?

Do me a favor and answer the following questions:
1. Are there any good jews?
2. Should all leftists, goons, and other kikes puppets be wiped out?
3. Should the white race be preserved and empowered?

But he wasn't, he was a mortal Semite who started a subversive cult because other Semites were working within the framework of Roman imperialism instead of sperging out over Yahweh like proper chosen kikes.

Oh shit user King David is back and he's here to lay down the law.

Your God is jewish yes. His name was Yaweh and he got his start as a humble Volcano Demon. Really moved up in the world!
WE
WUZ
SEMITES

Stop fucking around in a kike book.
I can claim that too! I'm God look at me! One time I was killed but I resurrected myself! I have 3 bitches that say so! Please convert all the human cattle to be my man-slaves.
And yet his followers slaughtered and burned at the stake countless of my actual people.
A jew is not my guy. Even if he was(he's not) I'm not basing my entire worldview on some random kike ramblings and worship him as a deity when the information contained therein is quite obviously bullshit and the manifestations of it in our age are so apparent for everyone to see. Every time there is a flyer in my town for bringing in refugees the keynotes speakers are Father John or Pastor Mike. The only thing you can say is that every single church is subverted. It's hilarious.
nah.

Lol no

Aww, can't bring yourself to say anything nice about white people? Silly kike.

I-is it over? Good talk, anons. I always love religious shit-flinging threads.

It means a direct translation.
it really isn't. (((Liberal))) preachers take things out of context. That is why we need strong men in the church to call them on their bull shit and hold the pastor accountable with scripture and context.
I haven't come across anything of contradiction in the KJV.

I hear a lot of complaining, yet not solutions. The KJV is the best moral foundation any European could build their life on. Honor, hard work, large families, and strong leaders of the household.

Jesus was not jewish he was Christian, are jews that convert to christianity still jewish or are they christian. Bobby Fischer and David Cole were jewish but they gave that up. And they are now no longer jewish.
Christianity has nothing to do with the Jews, We, not Pagans kicked them out of 109 countries and it was We who built Western Civilization. None of our values, or our reasoning, philosophy, Beer, Pipes, architecture, science, technology comes from Pagans. It comes from Christianity. Which will rise again from the ashes and once and for all purge the kikes from the world. Jesus will return and this time he will bring judgement.

Holy shit, I've been here since the first exodus but I guess the next question makes me a newfag, did that guy delete his posts? This thread was at 500 replies then 450ish. Anyway here are a bunch of archives, latest one first.
archive.is/8uYGq
archive.is/hnOGO
archive.is/RBEVY

Give me at least one "Fundamental doctrine" that have been changed or ever repealed by the RCC. Apparently, you're too stupid to understand those deep words, too, and can just scratch your head while looking at the Google search results.

I encourage you to read an actual KJV bible. The values are exactly what Europeans need and that's why the Vikings ultimately choose Christianity. Honor: good always wins over evil (Book of Revelations), strong men and leaders of the household, hard work, and large families.

I agree Christianity, the (((pope))) has been subverted, but that's why we need strong men to go to the churches and call out pastors who don't preach in accordance with the KJV Bible.

Could you point out in the bible where Yeshua calls himself a Cucktian? Then perhaps you could point out where in my post I called him a Jew instead of a Semite. Then you could explain how the jews were allowed into European nations in the first place if not for the Christcucks empowering court jews and allowing for the construction of jewish ghettos. Then you can try to explain how Christcucks invented that list of things you mentioned, all of which existed before Yeshua was ever born.

I doubt it though, because Christcucks spout nothing but lies in the same manner as the Semite they worship.

Amen Brother

You're a fucking cancer. You think that these things spread from Yahweh's magic power instead of the european mind. I'm sure all the Christians in Africa will finally build Rome if we just send in a few more blonde women missionaries, right? Christianity and nationalism are antithetical. You attribute all good to Yahweh instead of a higher power.
Showing that the christian imperative is on the individual soul rather than the collective strength. It's fine if our race perishes as long as we're good Christians. It is this cuckstian outlook that lays the groundwork of liberalism.

He called himself the Messiah which in Greek translates to Christos.
The jews did not have the power they have today, therefore when ever they misbehaved, they got btfo.
Show the Pagan who came up with any of the stuff I mentioned, you can start by naming the first pagan scientist.

Your own people*

Don't be dishonest. A direct translation and a translation are two different things and context is always in jeopardy no matter how close you get in a translation.

Of course you haven't. You keep hyping it as a one-trick solution to all of white's problems. It has to be literally perfect with how much you're selling it.

I'm sure in your perfect hypothetical fantasy land that's exactly the right countermeasure against your fantasy from falling apart.

A bible translation is not a solution.

Except when the preachers fuck it up right? Face it user, you're completely delusional. You might as well be a Holla Forums poster who found every variation of "but my ultra specific version of socialism/communism."


I can't help but notice that you and the above poster submitted posts 4 seconds apart from each other and are the only two left shilling for (((Christianity.))) What an amazing coincidence.

Jews are also not white but they call themselves that when it's convenient. Don't delude yourself. It's a label like any other but they all go back to the same (((source.)))

Except it has everything to do with the jews. It was made by jews, for jews, and even to this day continues to serve jewish interests. How does a jewish invention not serve its own masters when it was designed by them?

Two separate things. Civilization existed before christianity and civilization dies in the presence of jewish machinations. Christian monarchs assisted them at times and kicked them out on other occasions. Was it not Charlemagne that allowed jews to not only wield exclusive use of Usury?

top fucking kek

Almost nothing survived from pagans -who were native europeans- except christian disinfo. Might as well credit the muslims who took over Egypt as the original owners; because, in your own implication those things came from christianity-

Oh wait you didn't just imply it you meant it. Well done. I'm sure Jesus was making mead before Odin took his first sip of it. Instead of WE WUZ, it is Yeshua WUZ.
Europe will rise again jew free and that means without anything of jewish influence, christianity included. Tell me, what exactly do you think will happen to christianity once people are so widespread and aware of what the jews are like? Do you seriously think people will want anything of jewish origin in their lives? All those depictions of rabbi yeshua will be reminders of jewish lies.

Yes, it was because of our Aryan genes but the revolutionary world view of true Christianity guided and led them to glory never before seen on earth.

Christians were harshly persecuted for the first 300 years or so.

Islam set about conquering the world from day 1 and within ~100 years had spread from modern day Saudi Arabia all the way West to Spain across Northern Africa, East to modern Pakistan, and North to modern Turkey.

Jesus never advocated harming anyone. Muhammad was a warlord. ISIS operates in Muhammad's image.

(((Anyone))) who claims these are even remotely similar should be gassed.

Or it will be muslim and you'll have some retards telling you that Islam is quintessentially European and that mosques are a beautiful part of the architecture.

"no"

Wrong!
The KJV Bible does not say you have to interbreed or not. It never mentions race or color of skin, only tribes/people (like Ethiopians). Therefore, that decision is up to you, God does not care what race you marry (only that you don't marry someone who believes in a different God).
Therefore; you can be Christian and be Pro White and advocate your kids to marry White, since the KJV Bible does not take a position.

Metaphor: Think of the KJV Bible as the Consitution, and Pro White as a Bylaw.

Here we have the picture perfect selective christian worldview. It's only "true" christianity when it's positive but it's "not true" christianity when it's negative. Remind you of something?

Yes. It is based on the individual. This is what I said.
It is no sin to destroy your people as long as everyone bows down to Yahweh. It takes the most fundamental part of existence and relegates it into irrelevance.

So you can't quote him on calling himself a Cucktian rather than a Jew, nor can you back up even a single claim of Cucktians having invented those things, and you are so unable to explain how anyone but Cucktians could have let Jews into European nations that you produced pure nonsense that doesn't even reinforce your own point.


Except for the glories of European civilizations prior to the Younger Dryas and in (pre-Cucktian) antiquity.

Doesn't matter how Christianity progresses if the gods reject Moses…

Any sensible person should.

LMFAO…. wiggers.

youtube.com/watch?v=G35Qu7H92_U

————————–

11 minutes after I mentioned Executive Order 9066 on Facebook - 9.0 Quake Japan.

youtube.com/watch?v=hH5y71hOvk0

youtube.com/watch?v=O9IPNmIdQY0

Funny because the jews who wrote it did a lot of that. Feel free to say that it was probably not jews who translated it though. Since after all you keep ignoring the fact the original text was written by jews. Again, christian selectivist thinking.

Why would anyone on Holla Forums be interested in a God who doesn't care what race you marry?
Free advice. You realize you're setting yourself up for one hell of a meltdown if you keep placing all your eggs in the bible basket right? Literally shilling for a jew text is some kind of low and you found it.

Utter shit. Jews hate Christians more then any other group, especially more then Pagans, whose practises and rituals are very similar. Who plotted to use Christianity as a kike scheme, tell me the kikes name? Why does the talmud teach that Jesus is in hell, and in Israel they don't even allow kids to use the + sign because it resembles a cross. You just believe what your told like a real faggot goy.

Wrong! It gives principles for your people to follow to prosper, like men being strong leaders of the household, working hard, and having many kids. The KJV Bible says your people will be blessed if you follow its values. Additionally, it's not a commandment, but many stories warn of marrying outside of your tribe/people because of cultural hardships.

That's fine if it's a nigger dad with a blonde woman if he's strong leader and pumping her full of good Christian mongrels.
Sounds like Judaism. So if we have the same good Christian culture it's all good. I'm getting that you actually on a fundamental level do not understand why this is such an issue.

I told you faggot. Why did Christcucks deport jews? Ever heard of Duns Scotus, Peter Abelard, Pilgar the Elder, Hildegard von Bingen, etc.. and pretty much any monk who spent their time inventing shit.

...

The KJV Bible is a solution for Europeans. You don't have a solution.
You're fucked up, the KJV Bible is anti socialism/communism. It says you reap what you sow.
You eat by the sweat of your brow. Hard work! Not socialism. Communism is the most anti-Christian thing. Stalin killed 12-20 million Christians. In fact, Communists hate religion. So you're probably Communist, Faggot!

Jews see paganism as an existential threat and view Christians as good goys.

archive.is/5x5ej

Often the King indulged in too many loans and just kicked them out when they started getting real power. Merchant classes and feudalism don't mix. Why did the Christcucks burn so many of my people at the stake and launch crusades on them?

How you are able to ignore the rest of the post that explains that is very telling. How also very telling is that you ignore how jews have been able to live in close proximity and within the same cities as christians and jew them nonetheless. Does not hating the goyim exclude them from jewing the goyim at the same time? Following its evolution from a christian cult that later accepted converts from higher ranks in roman society and evolving into a multi-faceted and extra-layered religion that established a base with its own city shows that the inner workings of the religion will always remain a mystery. Just because it split doesn't mean it doesn't remain the same. A catholic will always be the same as a jehovah's witness and everyone in between.

Rabbi Yeshua

That's easy. It's what jews do. They didn't count on christians reading the talmud of all things and also jews have a bunch of retarded jew laws that they are supposed to live by and abide by, often doing repetitive tasks in really autistic ways.

Kike detected. Scared that Holla Forums is not the christian board you wanted it to be?


I swear, you two have an uncanny habit of submitting posts at basically the same time.

YOU DO? Can anyone say they've EVER seen one cunt say that? I doubt it. Smells like another shitty Jew thread.

The spread of christianity outside the roman empire was largely done by force, and like Daesh, they often destroyed pagan places of worship. And as a specific example of Christian savagery, Christianity gave us the Holocaust.

...

Easy. Unitatis redintegratio changed the fundamental dogma of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Lumen gentium established collegiality, a fundamental change.

Dignitatis humanae acquiesced completely to liberalism and changed fundamental church doctrine on religious liberty.

It's a document by the pope that both slanders native European peoples still practicing their religion as scapegoats for crop failure and infant death and advocates for a supranational organization to find these people and force convert them or put them to death.

No, you deflected from my question of "Why were there jews for Christcucks to deport in the first place if not for their own allowance of the jews into their nations?" Pre-Cucktian Europeans didn't have jews to deport. Well, I guess there were the Romans and such. Although, I seem to remember them taking some extreme action involving the jews and a temple, something to such a degree that some people have argued that the entire lineages of certain Semitic groups were ended. Under the ever-so-blessed eyes of Christcucks, we got a new Semitic group which is now firmly entrenched in a cabal over our heads speaking a bastardization of their Semitic tongue and German.

There would be no Semites in Europe today if not for the treason of Christcucks. How about you list the Cucktian nations from which Jews are banned TODAY.

This is the exact outcome for the cause of "Cucktianity." It has a Semite at the core, it is based on a Semitic tradition. If you touch it, you wither. It's miscegenation of the soul. If you don't believe in a racialist aspect of spirituality, you are proving exactly why Cucktianity is subversive nonsense.

There is only God vs Satan. Odin, Zeus and the whole crew of pantheistic deities were actual nephilim or as you know them, demi-gods. They were the great and not so great men of old. Basically Jews worship Satan who required and still requires blood just like Pagans worship Satan who also required blood
The Aztecs in particular loved there kike demon a whole bunch and gave him a shit ton of blood until the Catholics purged them all.

Jews still curse Rome to this day. Meanwhile they work alongside christians constantly. Jews hate Europeans, not christians per se.

They're being degenerate heathens and the Pope requested that they be punished for it, that's the point of it. Nothing to do with race, the Pope himself was European, it makes no sense at all.

If you're going to make ludicrous claims, please back it up with some real proofs.

It wouldn't be a stretch to say that you're literally the only person in existence that thinks a translation of a jewish text is going to save europeans. I hope you one day become popular on jewtube or some place so we can have a /cow/ thread about you. You are fascinatingly autistic.

So let me get this straight. Condensing a quote from Genesis into "you reap what you sow" is supposed to be extrapolated into a staunch anti-socialism/communism sentiment. Well consider me humbled my friend. You've shown me the value of this jewish text. I can tell that with your plan on ensuring that everyone on Holla Forums and every white nationalist abides by the KJV bible is exactly what the jews fear and how to save the white race. You know what? Hitler did do something wrong. He didn't use the KJV bible. You do understand sarcasm, right? You're not that autistic. That last part was sarcasm. Save this for later reference if you need a reminder on how to detect sarcasm.

Consider me an honorary communist then. I can't stop laughing. Please don't stop. This is killing me. My sides went to jew heaven an hour ago.

It was done by the disciples. Besides the fact, the principles taught from the KJV are still the best for building strong families.
The principles of a stong male leader of the household, wife who obeys the husband, hardwork (you reap what you sow), and large families (be fruitful and multiply). And KJV stories warn, but don't command, that you should not marry outside your tribe since you'll experience cultural issues.
Since God doesn't mention it, it wouldn't be unbiblical to have a policy to only inter-marry with whites.
Give me one good reason, seriously! It's the best ideology to build you moral foundation on. The principles are sound - build strong families. I agree Christianity has been highly (((Liberalized))) but, the KJV Bible is sound. That is why we need mentally strong white men to go to church and unliberalise it, hold the pastors accountable.

Well you hang around pretty fucked up people if they to rationalize ISIS.

Early Christianity didn't just butcher the whole lot. The conversion was a lot more peaceful.
The crusades were a bit different, but they were always for the control of the trade routes than religion. Even in the Baltics. The Hanseatic league was very powerful in those days.

...

Who were all Jews.

Incorrect. Best for building strong families was Roman paterfamilias. The Bible teaches anti-family feminist garbage.

whats with the greco-roman gods all of a sudden?

Holy shit you are dense. The fact that it had nothing to do with race is ENTIRELY THE POINT. There is no issue with slaughtering your kin like cattle if they are "being degenerate heathens" (filthy goyim) is completely a-ok betrays an outlook that is completely race-blind. Christianity seeks a mongrelized Christian world, not a european one.

Cause the jews weren't a threat until they were a threat. Europe at the time was split up into many different kingdoms so when one kingdom sent the jews away, the next didnt deal with them until they became too much. This explains why they were kicked out so many times, because they kept on wondering around creating new covers and disguises to try and gain power because they were particularily butthurt that God destroyed their shitty temple back in Jerusalem. The reason the Jews have taken over the world is due to the fact that they are driven by a zealous hatred of Christians and God himself who they are forever guilty of killing. There now stop pushing kikery through "Muh glorious-strong-Paganism"

Okay I've been just lurking the thread for the most part, but this is such a blatant lie I had to respond. Jews hate europeans because they perceive anything white as being inherently christian. Jews hate the white man because of christianity not the other way around.

I bet you believe holohoax "victim" stories too.

...

Are you autistic? How did you get to this conclusion? Are you going to ignore all the wars Europeans had against each other and only focus on the few that were "punished", not necessarily massacred for being degenerate tree worshipers?

I can't imagine how it must be to live within the Semitic box. I went to Catholic schools through high school and never believed the Semitic garbage for a moment.


Tell that to the druids and other traditional religious folk.


You mean the Romans, those good-for-nothing pagans. I guess pagans launched genocidal campaigns against the Semites, but the godly men of Christendom just dumped the problem on their godly neighbors.
And you failed to come up with a Cucktian nation from which jews are currently banned.

You think this is bad? Once the masses are redpilled on jews there will be endless mass confusion on what to do with (((christianity))) which has held a stranglehold on whites for hundreds of years. By then the (((christians))) will have their hands full trying to stop white nationalism in a last ditch effort to save christianity, now seeing white nationalism as an enemy of their jew religion.

A real Holla Forumslack has already looked far ahead and has long since decided that the truth is more valuable than anything, and so swallowing the truth on what christianity really is is of no consequence - just another jewish lie. Christians on Holla Forums are either still struggling or are simply just traitors still clinging to a lie.

From you, I take that as a compliment
Really? You want me to prove the bible is anti-communist. Are you new here?
Don't blame me if your small family of 1 or 2 kids turns out fucked up with of them being some whore.

You say a lot of nothing. Do you think the KJV Bible promotes degeneracy? What verse?

All the sudden? You can't kill the gods no matter how many burning bushes you talk to… I was fortunate enough to have the gods take an interest in me.

youtube.com/watch?v=yZAY-78zhmw

youtube.com/watch?v=MZVY-pGDsN4

I can pull shit out of my asshole too, but I won't do it because I don't need to lie in order to win arguments.

Exodus 20:12

1 Peter 3:1

Ephesians 6:1-3

Proverbs 12:4

Proverbs 14:1

I could go on, but you're clearly a shill.

Right, because a war on conquest or succession is completely the same thing as wars fought for exclusively an invasive alien, universalisit religion created by jews.

Amen

If following the native traditions of our peoples in accordance with the religion handed down from the men who began civilization on this planet, a system of beliefs and values which is superior in every way to Cucktianity, is to be considered degenerate by Cucktians, then you have perfectly illustrated why Cucktianity is Semitic poison for the soul that leads to treason against one's race.

Jesus prophesied that he would destroy the temple and 60 years later it was destroyed. God used the Romans. Actually Jesus really liked Romans. They also were most certainly not actual Pagans, none of the high ranking officials, philosophers or Ceasers believed in that romanticised deity shit. It was used to contain normies in the empire. Remember Socrates mocked them for believing in such childish stuff that they killed him because he knew that they were using it to control the masses… not much has changed except today the gods are nigger celebrities

Are you still here? Answer me you fucking nigger lover.

None of that is the best for building a family, as you claimed. It is some weak cuckold Jewish nonsense. First off, it directly addresses women, which makes it feminist. Only a feminist document would address women at all, since addressing them presumes they have free will, which they don't.

Original Roman way is best. Paterfamilias. No need for your kike feminist bullshit.

Actually the opposite of this is true. But don't take my word for it, have it straight from the horse's mouth.
archive.is/5x5ej


It's not that they "don't care", it's that refusing to abandon one's extant beliefs and practices in favor of foreign ones is apparently grounds for murder. It's equivocal to a hypothetical (white) Shariah government in some yuro country handing out execution orders for Christians that refuse to convert.

Pagans massacred each other with impunity for centuries, I guess pagans are anti-white now.

You fell for the "le evil inquisition" meme, didn't you? Please educate yourself on this subject before eating up anti-Hapsburg/Catholic propaganda from the 15th century.

lel, the same jews that had Christ killed for rebelling against their Talmudic shit? The same faith that was persecuted for centuries by Romans/Greeks before adopting it willingly?

You wouldn't be able to nor would I want you to, but go ahead. May I also remind you that you have ignored a lot of what I said and that this again proves the selective attention that a christian uses. Fun fact, a lot of people have actually spoken on the odd similarities of christianity to communism.
I am new to your brand of delusion, yes.

lol

i think i may of met them, that's why i was asking.

Colossians 3:18

Ephesians 5:22-24

Do you even realize how insane you sound right now?

Nope. Jews hated Europeans before Christianity existed. They still kvetch about Rome today. And they don't hate black Christians or Arab Christians or Asian christians, so this proves you are wrong. They hate Europeans, not christianity.

What's amusing here is that none of those quotes come from Yeshua himself.
Matthew 10:


Ah, and here we have the classic "Only those who worship a Semite can be sincere in their beliefs." A timeless Christcuck lie.

Exactly, Pagans also fed their babies to the fire like the faggots they were.

I think just said it best. The selective attention that a christian has. You ignored completely the latter half of my sentence. Because pagans killed each other we should now all swear down on our knees to Yahweh who's religion is shown to have no qualms at killing whites and seeks complete dominion over the world.


Christ was a jew.

Telling women to do anything, as if they have free will, is feminism. Yes.

A non-feminist document would not need to address women because it would presume them to be legally subordinated to men, as they should be.

Also.

Ceaser claimed to be a god… do you think he gave two shits about such a system? no, he didnt he cared about people worshiping him instead. Also many texts found in ancient Rome descried the "gods" to have been legends of actual heros of older times.

You should burn your bible, print out the post you just made, and ponder over those few simple lines for a long time. Everything you need to become free from the Semite is actually contained in your own pathetic words of disbelief.

Christ basically said to prepare yourselves if you are a Christian and opposed by your family for being so, that's all it is and that's all it was ever interpreted as by Christians.

The gods? I've been apotheosized. Technically I am the Divine God-Emperor somehow. What was your experience? You can contact me on /r/TheImperialCult or (twitter) @TheImperialCult if you want or describe your story here.

youtube.com/watch?v=FaOSCASqLsE

youtube.com/watch?v=MZVY-pGDsN4

You ignored completely the latter half of my sentence.
It's because it's irrelevant, you contradict yourself in saying "we're allowed to kill each other for THESE REASONS and not THOSE REASONS"

Nobody is claiming that.
who's religion is shown to have no qualms at killing whites and seeks complete dominion over the world.
This same religion has no qualms at killing heathens or heretics. Christians massacred Jews and Muslims just as they had massacred heathens/heretics, like I said it doesn't have anything to do with race, nor should you make a religion about race; this would fall under race worship, or idolatry.

You should accept that I proved you wrong and change your world view to suit the actual facts instead of holding on to a grudge against God. One day you will die and your soul will enter the afterlife, you should be living for that moment because thats when you will see that all your hatred against God was a mistake. God wants the best for you user. He has seen what you are capable of and what skills you posses, He hopes that you will use them for good and come to finally take the ultimate RedPill, God is real.

Real talk fam there was probably a lot of persecution of Christians up until Constantine. I'm guessing This would be mostly in Rome and a long important Mediterranean ports controlled by Rome. After this occurs Christian persecution likely stops in Roman controlled areas. However, shortly thereafter Rome moves east, and Muslims start to move east, and eventually up into Spain. This being 711 ad, a fierce northwest corner of Spain remains autonomous but the Muslim forces take pretty much the whole of modern day Spain and Portugal but are stopped up at the Iberian peninsula by Charles Martel and Frankish niggers.

I do like to think that through out this time period OP that various abbeys and monasteries pop up throughout European countrysides but what probably got most people into christianity imo, was not so much the teachings of Christ but hagiography.

That's my two cents relative to what I know. I don't know anything about the Baltic Crusades.
Sort of a black hole in my European historical knowledge tbh I guess.

Also depending on how early you mean by early there were many inter European wars involving various offshoots of Christianity involving primarily Spain and the Dutch, but all major European players at the time.

One thing in particular I'd like to know more about is Coptic Catholicism's history throughout the early caliphate and how they retained their position in Egypt during that time.


Christmas yes, Easter no. Popular Easter imagery and traditions yes.

But women aren't your fuckslaves with no freewill, there needs to be some form of addressing the role of women, and it was done so in the Bible no matter how much you try to twist it to fit your cuckold fantasies.

forgot to reply properly

Subhuman detected. KYS.

...

Exactly, it is encouraging treason against the foundation of a convert's nation. The Christcuck is in the wrong, the family is in the right. That Yeshua encourages rejection of tradition shows the true character of his cult. It is theistic proto-Marxism based on the promise of a mystic state rather than the earthly worker's utopia of that later Semite's ideology.


Proving further that Cucktianity is total nonsense. There is no separation between the world of our observation and the higher dimensions. All folk religions are based on such a principle in a way that could be thought of as complete animism. In this way, religion MUST be about race, because race is a part of this reality and therefore of the spiritual reality which pervades the lesser part. This is why you see racialist hierarchy from the Aryan religion, and why Cucktianity is Semitic trash unfit for the racially or spiritually aware.


My soul is already in the afterlife, it exists simultaneously through all of my incarnations. Fun fact, your belief in the Semitic heaven actually causes the Earthly time between reincarnations to be hundreds of years longer than the reincarnation rate of someone such as I who studies the actual truths of this world.

I never said what happens after death. I do not know what will happen. No one can know, so why do you claim to know? Prove to me reincarnation. It's completely pointless and boring.

Moses isn't a god you idiot… I'd give more respect to Christ by comparing him to Caesar than calling him Moses Jr.. You don't know who you're messing with spreading Mosaic lies about God.

youtube.com/watch?v=sAMeXjeswWg

youtube.com/watch?v=MZVY-pGDsN4

youtube.com/watch?v=C3Ks59XGThg

youtube.com/watch?v=Wm-WI0sBou4

Ever wondered why do kikes can only paste the same low quality shit memes?

yes, every day

You didn't prove him wrong. You iterated something of no consequence. Whether or not Greek or Roman gods were based on tales of legendary heroes does not impact the delusion that you indulge in every day. What that does in fact do is reinforce the idea that the pantheonic deities served other uses from a theological perspective. But in your narrow view you think it's a game to prove that your jew book and the deity behind it is the right one, not for one second checking to see if what you utter made sense. Then (in your mind) you claim victory and recount the threat posed against non-believers that when they die they will know they're wrong because of course it will be too late - which is how semites use fear tactics against the goyim because it is a threat relying on an unknown. Like the leftist who utters buzzwords it does not even understand, you repeated the same act for a different purpose.

CAESAR YOU FUCKING FAGGOT WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ACTING LIKE AN EXPERT IF YOU CAN'T EVEN GET HIS FUCKING NAME RIGHT
REEEEEEEE

Talking to you people is like talking to a brick wall.
Several people are, in fact, claiming that.
Yes. Once again, I understand. It is race blind and based on each individual soul and is a global religion that seeks dominion over the world. Honestly I've expounded on this so many times itt that I'm not going to do it again.
A religion ought to spring from the blood of it's people. And you need not worship your race but rule #1 should be no white genocide.

who gives a shit

What are you but the sum of your ancestors?

the nigger had horns fam c'mon nao

No, it's not. The Christian remains steadfast in his faith regardless of those close to him will oppose him because of this.

Christ preserves the tradition of man, Christianity is the closest you'll get to the natural law.

Christianity does not promote a political state or ideology, it promotes your salvation in the afterlife.


I could say the same thing about sporks, in this hierarchy of tools for food consumption, sporks are superior to spoons and forks in this physical world and all religions must be related to this phenomenon!

Every fucking thing you said, DOWN TO HIS NAME, was wrong.. You're the fucking definition of a christcuck, and you're why anons shit on your god in the first place you historically illiterate fuck

amazon.com/Saw-Light-Came-Here-Reincarnation-ebook/dp/B01N4RPKMX
Have fun dear cuck

EVERY POLACK KNOWS THAT THERE ARE NO GOOD JEWS.


STOP WORSHIPING A JEW YOU FUCKING IMBECILES.

explain

That you would even attempt to place racialism and sporks in the same context in order to downplay the importance of race just goes to show how blind Christcucks are to the true natural law as described by our nativist "pagan" traditions.

No, only his title did I get wrong. What else?

I got work tomorrow lad. Gotta hit the hay. Have fun with the christcucks.

WE WUZ RE'NCARNATDAD N SHIEET

How about you gas yourself for the greater good of this world?
No, nobody is claiming that. Show me who is claiming that.

Yes, I understand this. What is wrong with this idea? Wouldn't you want to save someone from damnation for eternity regardless of his race if you had to chance to do so?

These religions are false, there is one true faith and that is the Christian one. If you want to save European people, start focusing on political matters and not religious matters. You've fallen for Jewish subversion, making you think the faith your people have been following for 2000 years in functioning, traditional societies was suddenly invented to kill these very people. This conspiracy makes no sense at all and you need to escape this hole you've been subverted into.

Please. That's like a white dude saying he's Hindu or Christian.

What that means is that Paganism is false and wrong. It is not true that there are multiple gods that exist that merit our worship. There is only one God.

Note how he squirms in the same manner as the race he worships

I will actually look into this though.
Thanks, good night fellow user.

Well I'm just absolutely shocked. People who take up the religions of the tribe also take up the tribal infighting.

I'd like to see your genetics save you from the pits of hell, you lazy fuck.

Shove a spork up your asshole.

I know this is the most obvious bait post ever but fuck me if it isn't triggering my autism anyway

What's there to explain?

...

I bet you subscribe to Sargon of a Cuck, lurk more you stupid newfaggot.

No, I just do not believe in Reincarnation. It seems that in your endless search for meaning you have wound up in the most illogical belief system of them all. There is much more proof for God then there is for reincarnation. Namely that for Reincarnation to even exist there must be a God that caused it to exist. If you do not like the word God then just replace it with whatever you can find but it will always amount to something as powerful and "outside of time" like God.

This is exactly how you sound right now.

Im Swiss so I don't speak english 100% correct.

I'd rather not be saved from the pits of Hel, if you know what I mean. No one should worry about the Gehenna you were actually referring to though, since the Semitic tradition is false.


Cucktianity has nothing to do with God though, and everything to do with worshiping a mortal Semite and a Semitic tribal deity.

There are no based jews, and that includes yours.

No, everything has to do with God. The meaning of Life is to better understand who this mysterious being really is and why he choose to create us.

Reiterating your religious belief does not disprove another religious belief. Are you seriously that dense?

All Semites are evil, even the anti-Semitic ones. No exceptions, not even for rabbi Yeshua.

Not gonna lie, I cringed.


John 8:44

Literally telling them they're the children of the devil, and he's somehow in on some ancient conspiracy with the Jews to kill Europeans?

That's a God-King. You should mind your manners.

youtube.com/watch?v=N-Esh4W3dfI

youtube.com/watch?v=MZVY-pGDsN4

Idiot doesn't know what the Baltic Crusades were.
Hint: nothing to do with Islam

Every Yeshua quote about the jews and what they do is playing the jew's against themselves. He was a guy who worked at his dad's carpentry shop until he was in his 30s and decided he wanted to make his bid for becoming known as the messiah, which was really popular at the time. Of course a jew would cite what jews know about each other and play with that. It's calling your enemy's bluff when you were once on their side.


A Jew jewing jews does not absolve the jew from being a jew just because he was trying to out-jew jews.

Please explain why I care about Semitic squabbling. It's not my religion. It's not of my people. It's Semitic mind AIDS.

If you want to have anything to do with Cucktianity, you are at a very low level of that understanding. Its best parts are stolen from European traditions which were all more complete, and the core of the religion is Semitic nonsense rooted in their own tribalism including the cult of the mortal Semite Yeshua. You can find an equivalent messiah in every alien contactee, except without any of the Semitic baggage since kikes aren't prone to getting zapped by the superspectrum.

Except that's not how things work. The only reason Christ had followers was because he could prove it to them through miracles and through words of wisdom; even at an early age Christ would be debating with rabbis in temples.

But you're clearly a master theologian and historian, you've definitely done your research.


Except one is a rebellion of the other which undermines their racialist centered salvation. Next time you hear a Jew call you a shabbo goy cattle that was put on this Earth to serve him, remember this is what Christ opposed and what you supported.

Gaius Julius Caesar was his name, it was only after his death that "Caesar" was adopted as a title by succeeding Emperors(A trend started by his successor to accentuate his blood relation with the first of the Roman Empire). As for all the other bullshit you're spewing about "not really believing lol", religion in Rome is an incredibly dense subject, it was nearly 800 years old(by most estimates) before imperialism. Their "religion" was steeped heavily in their culture and traditions, so it's not entirely incorrect to say that in many ways they "worshiped" heroes of the past IE. their ancestors. There is literally zero surviving evidence to support the claim that Caesar didn't sincerely observe the myriad rituals and religious practices of daily life in ancient Rome. You're making purely speculative and unsubstantiated guesses about a man who's been dead for 2000 fucking years

And offered it to EVERYONE as long as you bend a knee to your kike and savior. It's still based on the same Semitic heritage. I'm not a Semite. I have no use for it. Are you a Semite?
Mind AIDS

And those miracles were real, right?
You mean like giving up all your shit to follow him?
Again, because that totally happened and wasn't the retroactive inventing of his street cred?

You can't even for one minute realize you've been duped by a jew lie, a really big one, and sort it out. I get that you want to cling to your "faith" which in and of itself totally isn't a countermeasure to make sure the masses don't escape the delusion but on the off chance that you have been duped by a jewish lie, you won't even for a second test it to see if it has all the hallmarks of jew lies. Protip: It does. Another Protip: faith-based arguments do not apply. But you can try to have it both ways but that's not going to work.

… and?
… so?
I'm not a Semite. I have no use for it.
Lots of people who weren't Semites adopted the faith because it was truth, they don't care about where it originated from, salvation is salvation.
Are you a Semite?
Yes, though I'm no Jew if that makes a difference.

...

I am ready and willing to accept what Christianity is, but Holla Forums doesn't understand what Christianity is, it is evident from the endless anti-Christian shilling since the start. Heck, I bet this thread was created to start some anti-Christian shilling.

What I mean is, you are not a reliable source of information, I'd rather stick with what the Bible says and not what some random armchair theologian on a Taiwanese basket weaving forum is telling me about it.

If you want to see what a real "control the masses religion" looks like, look at Marxism and how their followers openly spit in the faces of Christians in all their degeneracy.

And we're done. You've demonstrated my point about Christianity being Semitic mind AIDS. Thanks! Anyone can be pozzed by it as long as they are willing to take the kike load.
You mean people were infected, and the fact that you're a Semite explains why you're here shilling.

I think we do. It's funny you're supporting the post of someone openly admitting to being a non-white while defending Christianity. Utterly fantastic job at demonstrating the failure of that religion to preserve white Europeans.

Sounds like a plan, Schlomo.

Oh and food for thought. Your marxists were a lot closer to the christians then you or they would like to admit. Pic related.

...

...

...

No, you've decided what Christianity is and are committed to that. You're somewhere between an apologetic and a zealot.

So in other words, you trust the Bible because it's true and you know that it's true because it's the Bible.

Or you could just take a peek at the history of the RCC.

Just because it's "semitic" in origins doesn't make it any less true because you have an aversion to Jews. Besides, Europeans made Christianity European, while the Jews remained Judaic, and the Arabs became Islamic. Regardless of how much cognitive dissonance you'll experience, Christianity is European.

How does that explain anything? I probably have identical principles as you, except we differ in spirituality, this wouldn't have been the case even a century ago.


Why shouldn't I want the Europeans to keep their traditional spirituality instead of worshiping literal memes? Do you realize how embarrassing this is? The decline of Europe is identical to the decline of Christianity.


That image is babby-tier theology that has been debunked many times before. You're not worth the time if you're going to show me how much you've been indoctrinated by shills.

Not really, no.
Is this supposed to be a compliment?

You're not understanding me, I'd rather trust the source of Christian teachings than have someone on an anonymous imageboard which is known to be heavily anti-Christian tell me what the Christian faith is.

I'm not a part of the RCC, as vague as you make out their "mind control" to be.

Tinfoil hat conspiracists come off as more sane than you.

It's like debating leftists on twitter. Funny you say the shills got to me though.


Nice mental gymnastics as to avoid discussing the content, Chaim. If they did plan it thousands of years in advance that would actually be impressive. I would have a hearty laugh if some jew texts buried in the sand said they were going to lure people into this thing called "communism" by first luring people into adopting something called "christianity." But no, the reality is that they just gutted repackaged christianity into communism and took the religious aspect out of the equation.

Nigger, just type on google "what does this quote mean?" and you'll get many responses from scholars; I guarantee you'll find nothing of the Marxist sort in the scripture.

You're basically saying Christian theology is Communist ideology, and it was the Christians all along who slaughtered Christians, destroyed their places of worship, and made way for Jewish Bolsheviks to rule?

Well done.

This thread reads like a schizophrenic fever dream holy shit what the tits which way is up?

Feel free to prove it.

You can't possibly be this stupid. I know you already admitted that you would rather have other people think for you but this is just ridiculous. Those scholars are paid to interpret the jew text. They're not paid to see it any other way. The point is that it is extremely compelling to see the similarities between the jew text of christianity and what marxists later commanded. Obviously that got a different reaction out of you and you still will not dispute the various quotes. Disputing them would force you to recognize that they are indeed matching in so many different ways, per quote.


Yes, they did a fine job actually. Incidentally it turned out that way - (((coincidentally))) the ideology is fundamentally the same and the only difference is that one is missing any religious connotation. But you christians tend to look the other way and selectively quote from the jew text, frame it as you like to see it, and then try to convince people that that quote is what you say it means. Or in your case, only what "scholars" claim it means.

Well, it's truth for me, these types of things are hard to prove. However, if it helps my case at all, Christ fulfilled all the prophecies foretold before he was even born, which should bear some sort of credibility.

Your content is garbage, as is your brain.
You have 31 posts of crap, and a clear effort to D&C.
Filtered, gassed and holocoastered.

...

I could very easily go through every quote on that image and show you how much you don't want to know.


You've gone off the deep end, lad. Nothing you say makes any sense, there is no reason for Christians to kill millions of their own because Bolshevik Jews were opposed to Christianity.

There's no consistency at all to what you're claiming, I don't even expect any of it from you anymore.

Last time I checked, Christ never mentioned the workers uprising or the bourgeois taking advantage of the workers, or any class warfare bullshit the kike Marx spewed. The Bible is not a political book, you mongrel, get used to it.

No, I simply claimed that Christ fulfilled what the prophets had spoken off centuries before his birth. Do you understand how the Bible was put together?

No there was very little violence. Christians retaliated when necessary they were never on the offensive.

You see when you hold the actual word of god in one hand and the Holy Spirit in the other your enemy will know drop his sword. Because even your enemy will know the word of god when it is the word of god.

The only ones who will fight god are the ones who are short sighted and hang to the earthly life(Jews and leaders).

Isis on the other hand does not have the word of god that is why they must force others to believe it through violence.

Well why don't you? I've been here for a while. I can wait. Spoilers: You won't.

Funny you are jumping to this when all I did was provide an image that compared quotes from the jew text to marxists.

I can hear you kvetching from my side of the globe but that's not going to help your argument. You could stay on point but that would mean you would actually have to refute what I and others are saying.

Maybe not as dramatic but even that image has a quote that is a prelude to class warfare. Again, you will not try to refute those quotes. You are not invested in honest discussion.
Funny, it still is used for political gain and even inspiration for government-founding documents.


By a bunch of jews. Is that a trick question?

Nice digits.

(check'd)
truly a blessed post

What the fuck. You cunts are ruled over by Jews and r-strategist scum who seek your destruction, your lands are being overrun with foreigners, you're surrounded by cucks on all sides, and you're worried about which ancient fantasy myth bullshit to believe? None of it is real. It's a distraction. Harden the fuck up and fix your fucking priorities. After you have your own countries, and the destruction of the earth's ecosystem is halted and reversed, then you can worry about what shared myths are best for a stable and healthy society. That is, if you even live to see that day. Protip: you probably won't.

Because it takes time reading through everything, I'll compile it all up just for you ;^)

No, what you did was accept what I said to be true while distorting the original meaning of texts in the Bible to fit your inconsistent conspiracy.

Like I said, you're not consistent that's why I've pretty much lost hope that you'll listen to anything rational.
If it had anything to do with "class warfare", you'd have seen 2000 years of the "workers" fighting the "bourgeoisie", but evidently that never happened since it was never part of the Christian faith.

That happened even if it wasn't what Christ intended. Even religions get subverted, but the true meaning won't cease to exist.

Ironically enough, it was Europeans who assembled these texts and wrote them all down painstakingly by hand in monasteries as they did with other cultural and scientific works; but Christians were against European culture and wanted them dead? I don't understand how to put two and two together :^)

I don't think you're literate enough to understand what you're talking about. Jesus is clearly God-King and the Romans in the gospels frequently show him the utmost respect. The documents clearly do not belong with Mosaics, but if you had studied them you would know that.

youtube.com/watch?v=JvKIWjnEPNY

youtube.com/watch?v=O9IPNmIdQY0

Definitely a kike.

But if your hands are full how do you hold all of this reddit spacing?

I'll believe it when I see it. Taking bets; sophistry, intellectual dishonesty, faith-based arguments, non-answers, non-arguments.

You and the other faggot keep insisting that it's too wild and too elaborate that christianity was a primer for communism. The reason why is that you and the other faggot keep implying that it is meant to be literal as if those two things were planned thousands of years ago. This is why you and others are being dishonest because what was said was completely obvious in its straightforwardness. To specify, christianity as an ideology that people use in order to help run their lives puts their thoughts in line or as close to ideas that are within the realm of communism. Communism by design took advantage of an already meek thinking populace. What you and the other faggot keep doing is to condense and twist that as to mean that it was literally planned that christians would become communists and it was planned. When in actuality it was as organic as jewish tricks get that now that people follow christianity on a large scale, getting them to follow something like communism would not be too difficult. The added bonus is that they were replacing religion with the state.

I've been very consistent. I know you are in dire need of changing this discussion to just me but I won't let you have it that way.

Again, you need to twist the information presented to that but that is not only not what was said but you need to misrepresent what I was said. I'm glad that you're doing this because this is yet another example of dishonest christian posters who operate very not unlike shills.

Except in this case the religion itself was subversion.

You're referring to the First Council of Nicaea. Assembling what was already in writing is not the same as writing it down for the first time. I'm going a step further and labeling it for what it is, a jewish text.
Celibate men who became genetic dead ends and withheld information in their libraries.
The church itself to this day knows its true purpose, eradicating european culture by assimilating it and then diluting it. No matter what re-branding a jewish trick takes, at the end of the day it's just another jewish trick.

I can only say for the Slavs on this matter, but they llost almost the entirety of their religious and mythological stories under Christians who didn't write it down after destroying it like the celts and nords got. So once Christians took over and had destroyed the pagans without keeping records, the slavs didn't have anything to worship. They have scant records of Perun and the like and at best they just say it's similar to Nords and go the weak route do to they destroyed history.

Another religion debate… for those very enlightened faggots:

Nothing is provable. The one thing that every enlightened faggot believes (and they are so enlightened that they "know it") is that if you repeat an experiment under the same conditions it will yield the same results. This is not a logical assumption nor a reasonable assumption. It is simply a practical assumption. You cannot prove it (saying it worked yesterday, empirical evidence, does not prove it).

To make anything provable you need to create a frame of assumptions that you assume are true. From that you can conclude whether or not other assumptions are true.

From mathematics we learn that no matter your assumptions as long as they are consistent you will always have a frame that within itself is consistent (only the base assumptions are not provable)

(checked)
Reddit spacing looks better. Except on Reddit.

Christianity at absolutely no point had shitstains like ISIS. There is no equal to the evil that Islam produces because they are directly commanded to do so, whereas senseless violence is frowned upon in the Bible.

With that said: once the Roman Empire formally adopted Christianity, it did what it does best and started purging the heretics. They were doing this to Christians before they started doing it to non Christians precisely because Christianity refuted their libshit understanding of objectivity, hence they were heretics, because Christianity claimed to be an absolute truth rather than just another decoration for the pantheon.

Being ashamed of of your Christian roots is being ashamed of your ancestors and their history. Don't be a cuck and fall for the meme

None of that happened, stop lying to yourself.

No, I never did that. What you essentially claimed was that Marx took the Bible, took out all the spiritual aspects, even going as far as being anti-Christian, then wrote his book to make Christians kill other Christians for the Bolshevik state. Do you not understand the lunacy here, or are you being intellectually dishonest?

No, you haven't been consistent at all, your conspiracy theory makes zero sense, even the flat earth conspiracy has more validity than your "christian communism" nonsense. You don't provide any proof except for that flawed image that I'm in the process of systematically refuting since you don't have the intellectual capacity to think for yourself.

No, you know you're wrong but you won't admit it. If the Christian faith was centered around communism you would have seen communist Christians exist even before Marx was born, but that never happened. This is a big hole in your conspiracy.

I'd like to tip my fedora to you, but sadly I don't own one.

We can use date these texts to before Christ was born was my point, historians and scholars have studied the life of Christ and all have concluded the same thing, and that was that he fulfilled the prophecies foretold in these texts. Now, if you don't want to believe it and say "well it's all jewish!" then be my guest, frankly I don't care enough about this subject to continue on it especially since I haven't done in-depth study on it, and neither have you.

What's the matter, are you too weak to live a pious life of discipline and restraint? They preserved the information within their libraries and were eventually used to enhance European culture and scientific advancement.

I don't understand how you've reached this conclusion, please explain your though process, the history behind it all, some level of consistency is needed for this conspiracy to properly flesh out, otherwise it's just tinfoil-tier nonsense.

Fuck off you god damn Jews with your god damn Christianity and fucking Jew Jesus. I am damn well ashamed of my own people falling for your poison the same way I'm ashamed for modern day people falling for Social Justice bullshit, for Liberalism, for LGBT bullshit, for Feminism, etc. I am ashamed and enraged since I know the source of it

Kys

I'm more of a fallen Christian because I hate going to the church, who needs mo' money, and likely supports Sanctuary Cities, I'm just sick of the religion.

It is a simpleton argument consider the "Jesus Named the Jew" argument. In the testimony of Jesus very short time as a leader or his "ministry"/"cult" why was there such seething anger towards the Pharisees? Isn't this the Hippie guy with long hair who says "Groovy" a lot?

I don't see it being that farfetched that if he was god in the flesh would he not have known what kind of shitstain Rabblinal Judaism would be on the earth? Thus when he says their father is the Devil, you don't have to accept the modern Christcuck interpretation that he was merely upset with the leaders who were plotting his death. Perhaps his naming of the Jew was the naming of Rabbinical Judaism which of course followed the Talmud, not the Torah. The Talmud officially lists 167 BCE as making it's first appearance.

So my take is these North American faggots like Hagee, imploring the flock that it's our duty to protect Israel, is another way of saying "Fuck You Jesus I'm not listening to John:8 when you are mean to God's Chosen people". A quick scan of John 8 shows he did not fear them, because he did not fear their father.

I'm not going to waste time quoting John:8 but I believe he knew exactly who he was dealing with and the modern Jew-Sympathizer finds a lot of excuses to ignore his words.

Additionally Mel Gibson's Sequel to the Passion is apparently going to be more "warrior" focused showing him conquering Satan. Maybe Mel's movie and the growth in red-pilled people in general might allow us to get the message of the Talmud out.

At least early Christians knew how to deal with kikes.
You'd have to wait 6,000,000 years before ISIS ever hurts international jewry or political zionism, and that will only be by mistake from a CIA/Mossad primed bomb left on a bus.

ISIS is isreal and we have another thread filled with teams of jewish hasbara doing their jewey thing, attacking Christianity and pretending ISIS isn't jewish.

...

Nothing happened is correct. You promised to deliver a rebuttal to each of the comparison quotes between the bible and marxist thinkers. You're free to not actually deliver. You weren't going to anyway, it's okay.
LOL

No I did not. The only lunacy here is you. Going to link all the posts where this started. >>9552200 >>9552225 - that last post was you. How did you yourself change your mind on what you were trying to pretend I was saying and now end up with this?

Which conspiracy theory? The one you just invented out of nowhere or compelling comparisons between what's in the (((bible))) and what marxists have said?
This is going to be good. I've had many laughs this day and this is going to be the most fulfilling one of them all. Please deliver on this semite. You have one job and it's very easy. Deliver the spectacular flop you promised that you once called "debunked."

LOL

You conveniently eluded my explanation This is why Hitler grew tired of debating with jews. They do shit like this. I'm going to copy and paste my previous explanation. You will do two things: 1, ignore it again. 2, invent some other twisting of what I said into something I did not say. This is more proof that christian shills are problem posters.

A fedora comment would indicate atheism. That wasn't one.
You're not even talking about the same thing, again. First it was about the canonization, then it's Yeshua conveniently staking claim to fulfilling prophecies. Make up your mind semite.
The point is that intelligent men did not pass on their genes. Then the church forbid access to such information that did not get used until hundreds of years later and some of which is still behind vatican walls.
The church leaders know the true history of the church which is one of subversion. It's pretty cut and clear.

Forgot to copy-paste my explanation:

Restating what will happen:
You will do two things: 1, ignore it again. 2, invent some other twisting of what I said into something I did not say. This is more proof that christian shills are problem posters.

Romans 11:28

I wonder which version of the Bible changed the text :^)? Basically it means that the Jews reject the gospel out of spite, or they do so because they are enemies of the gospel and God. However, the few that accept Christ are beloved by God especially due to their previous piety to God by their ancestors.

Galatians 3:28
This means that under the authority of Christ, we are the same. We do not get any special treatment in the spiritual world, we are all baptized the same way either male or female. This does not seek to eliminate the existence of race nor sex, simply that it wouldn't make a difference what you are or how rich you are, at the end of the day you're on the same level as your fellow Christian and will be treated as such.

Mathew 10:35
I explained this previously in the thread, but you seem to have ignored it. It basically means that Christ wants you to be prepared for the stress and struggles you will endure as a Christian in a heathen household. It has nothing to do with being "antagonistic" with each other like Engels claims in your image.

I already explained Galatians 3:28, moving on.


2 Thessalonians 3:10
Paul in this verse basically explains the importance of laboring by emphasizing the importance of food. A man must eat, therefore he must labor, this is what humans are built to do, there is no intention to take food from anyone in this verse.

Leviticus 27:30
This is from the OT, offering gifts/sacrifices to God is no longer necessary. I believe this means that everything created by God belongs to him, even the plants that grow from the soil. This is not a government type of tithe, as you do not give to the government what you do not own.

Acts 4
I believe this is a show of compassion swayed by what the apostles had said and performed earlier at the temple. The grace of God had made these people generous to one another, they had no need for material possessions with the spirit of God among them.

James 5:4

Jewish law permitted no delay in payment to your laborers, at any rate it would seem justified to say that the laborers were exploited by not receiving payment for their hard work.

Leviticus 19:34

This means to basically do unto others what you want them to do to you, as the Israelites were once strangers in Egypt, they are to treat strangers in a welcoming fashion. This has nothing to do with "blending the general mass of the population" as your communist propaganda is spouting. It's simply saying to show the level of compassion you want others to show to you.

I'm no theologian, but I think I did an okay job at explaining it. One more thing, this image is like pulling at straws to get to the predetermined conclusion, like Trump is a nazi because his family was from Germany that eventually became National Socialist.

Nice LARPing.

I think this thread shows perfectly why paganism failed.
Christians are able to give various explanations and attempt actual discussions, while the American Norse LARPers just repeat christcuck/kike infinetly, like broken records.

This just basically confirms what I had said:

This conspiracy didn't come out of nowhere, you invented it and confirmed it for me. I read your explanation which is "people were dumb and they fell for it just like they fell for Christianity xd", it's not sufficient enough to prove that Christianity had its hand in creating Marxist ideology, especially since, again, you have no evidence to prove it.

This is the best you could come up with? Just giving generic explanations for the jew text? You didn't even address the most essential part which is the fact that so many instances of it fall in line with marxist thinking. It's like you pulled this from a sunday school textbook with its innocuous explanations and skipped the main point. The main point being that jews carry with them a semblance of consistency -that word you've been throwing around- and re-purpose it for nefarious activities. Another funny thing is that it ties right back with what I reminded some autist that relying on interpretation is the key to how christians ignore the meaning in the bible and keep uttering things they do not understand.

Thanks for the entertainment Chaim. May you find peace in your delusions and that peace be of no consequence to those around you. No one has to suffer you nor your delusions.

Your own post contradicts your ah-ha moment Moshe. You offered two condensed versions and the latter contradicts the first. I'm sure it was real in your mind but that's not how the world works.

I didn't say that Christianity had a hand in creating Marxism. I said that in so many ways that it paved the way for it. You in your semitic rat-brain interpret that as literal and even elaborate. Again, you are delusional and keep twisting what is being said. More proof that semites cannot be trusted, least of all with keep consistent.

It's better than trying to force the text to conform to Marxist ideology, like I said, I'm no theologian and someone else could explain it a lot better, so speak to someone about it instead of forcing yourself to believe in this subversive idea that Christianity was behind communism all along.

I could quote word for word what scholars say but it would be too much, so I condensed it for you ungrateful fuck.

I explained certain quotes that you probably just skimmed through and concluded that "it's still marxist!" even though the context is vastly different. I don't care enough, you're beyond help, please proceed to the chambers.

You didn't explain anything. You recycled sunday school tier explanations.

Yes, you should have done the former because obviously your own explanations are terrible and sound forced. I'm sure the scholars would be much more enlightening, after all you claimed that was your main source and that random posters on an imageboard was insufficient for you.

Except I didn't already explained that constantly but you refuse to accurately quote what I type. You have done nothing since I exposed the fact that jews are consistently -your favorite word- reusing the same line of thinking and twisting it into something worse as time goes on. I'll condense it down for you once more, christianity paved the way for communism. Its texts fall in line with marxist thinking. Christianity primed people for what marxism led to. This is because christianity has always been about subversion.

Yes, they are different, but they are also closely related, sharing some of the same holy books and worshipping the same god. The main difference is that the Jews did not accept Jesus Christ as any type of figure, neither a prophet nor a god. Christianity was considered another form of Judaism for about a century.


Not true. Rabbinic Judaism is not all Judaism, but the primary form of their religion since the 6th century.


Like Christianity, Judaism is cultlike and religiously intolerant. Jewish identity is built around them being the worst victims in history. Christianity had a similar persecution complex for many centuries, with fabricated stories of them being victims to the Romans, but their ultimate worship of Jews has made them cede that claim to Jews, and if they are white Christians, most everyone else.

Note that most Christians today are not white.

It may as well have created it regardless according to your claims. You would think that these texts would have spawned communist thought even before Marx existed, but no, it doesn't have anything to do with Christianity especially since the Marxists were heavily anti-Christian, there was no appeal for Christians to join them.

Even during the Spanish civil war, the Marxists were destroying churches and sacred places, the Catholics worked with the nationalists and took back their country.

I could cite many theologians that have been heavily anti-jewish, but you already know of Luther who had even published a book on 'The Jews and their Lies'.

Honestly, you're so fucking historically illiterate you need to create some fictional story of how the Bible paved the way for communism instead of communism outright being influenced by some rich jew who never worked a day in his life.

Numerous figures have pointed out the influence of Christianity on Marxism.


-Roland Boer

From nationalvanguard.org/2015/11/communism-is-neo-christianity/

Christianity was the soil being tilled. Communism was the seed destined to be planted there.

I think the real problem here is that you're just mad that you found out that Christianity is communism-lite and you were planning on being like that faggot who insisted that the KJV bible was the saving grace for the white race. Christianity primed the people for communism so the ideas wouldn't be foreign. Deal with reality or die in delusion, semite filth.

These arguments don't really have anything to do with anything. Catholics fought Protestants, it doesn't mean that their religions aren't closely related.

Anyway, from the earlier link:


— Frederick Engels

You are really historically ignorant. The entire Reformation and Witch Scare had people across Europe massacring one another, burning one another at the stake, and with some forms of Protestantism like early Calvinism, they were as severe if not more so than ISIS.

They also destroyed massive amounts of European artwork, including Christian artwork.

t. Frederick Engels

Come back to me when a Christian theocracy goes full communist.

Dude, the contents of a holy book is almost irrelevant WRT how a religion is practiced.

Try to sum what was all christians have in common, every single christian that ever lived. Not just the christians you personally know, but also christians like Hitler, Martin Luther, and Torquemada.

What do they have in common? Hardly anything at all, which is how much guidance the Bible is. The same goes for the Koran.

Where in Mein Kampf does that quote come from?

...

The christfags are going to lie, and this problem still infests Holla Forums to a large extent (because it is not easy to be truly free from brainwashing). If you want to hear more about these terrorists in an uncensored environment, consider visiting Odinia.org. There is plenty of exposure on what's wrong with them there, in a place where it can't get BALEETED. It's not "peaceful" when you burn people alive and kill the majority of several White ethnicities by the sword. It was also the beginning of ANTI-WHITE ideology in Europe and the root of our problems.

Everything Hitler said, did, and wrote indicates that he was a christian (catholic). None of his actions indicate otherwise.

"Hitler's Table Talk" is the one exception, which is why I am inclined to view it as a hoax.

————————————
(following quoted text from link at bottom)

the problems with using Hitler's table talk conversations as evidence for Hitler's apostasy are manyfold:

1) The reliability of the source (hearsay and editing by the anti-Catholic, Bormann)

2) The reliability of multiple translations, from German to French to English.

3) The bias of the translators (especially Genoud).

4) The table-talk reflects thoughts that do not occur in Hitler's other private or public conversations.

5) Nowhere does Hitler denounce Jesus or his own brand of Christianity.

6) The "anti-Christian" portions of Table-Talk does not concur with Hitler's actions for "positive" Christianity.

nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm

Kikes used it to practice crypto Zionism. Jews adamantly deny being involved with the Templars, but the Templars were full of experienced bankers and they wanted Jerusalem. The protecting (((Christian pilgrims))) thing is a hoax, real Christians didn't indulge in rebuilding another Jewish temple. Salvation no longer required sacrifices, and there was a new Jerusalem on the horizon. Crusaders were perfectly justified in defending Europe from the Muslim hordes obviously, but that never would have happened in the first place if the kikes had just stopped trying to take it back and pissing off arabs as a result. If it involves taking back the holy land and then establishing a theocracy its just a form of pseudo Zionism.

There are no contemporary Christian theocracies. There are however communist theologians.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology

A lot of truth to this. You would think that Christianity was the nicest of the three major Abrahamic religions based on the New Testament, but that is not the case historically, they all have very extensive crimes.

Christianity is dying quickly on Holla Forums.

Many of Hitler's comments against Christianity were in the original German from Table Talk. Also, we have testimony from Albert Speer and notes from Goebbels that Hitler disliked Christianity in private conversation, especially in the later years.

Hitler was a politician and had to be outwardly friendly to Christianity. Also, he himself seemed to be a little torn on the issue, as he didn't like the materialism of contemporary forms of atheism, and thought paganism was impractical. He was frankly sort of a modern "spiritual but not religious" type of thinker, which meant he would sometimes speak in terms that sounded very similar to Christianity.

Not ATM, but don't forget the Dominist movement in the US (not much power today AFAIK) or the shit Putin is doing in Russia. Mixing nationalism and religion is a very dangerous game.

The heads of the church become the ones with the most power. The true god of the Jews are the Rabbinic hivemind,and the true god of the Arabs are the Mullahs and those descended from Mohammed. They spread folk tales to make their flocks stay committed to their ideologies and fearful of non believers. Jehova's witnesses, Muslims, Jews, and Mormons are Jewish sects even if Jews deny it. What other groups separate themselves from non believers? Encourage fear of outsiders? Don't talk to goyim/infidels/non believers/idolators-it'sall the same shit, but the hivemind is fragmented and the clerics hold all the power. Jews and Muslims hate Christianity because they fear that their children will assimilate into it because of its culture~Jews welcome to strangers? Not so much, not unless they are Jews or provide some sort of advantage, even then its never official, always through some channel like Freemasonry. Muslims are fine with you converting to their religion, but you know how most of them are if you say you want to go, death threats for leaving, if not exile. Christians are more welcoming than the latter and they hate it for that reason, you can't make a welcoming group of people seem like enemies if they've never done anything to you. It's the reason Jews persecute themselves and get caught-they aren't threatened by gentiles at all, but if they get too comfy with that idea there is a possibility that they will leave and assimilate into some other gentile culture-Jews and Muslims don't cant stand that, it is a slap in the face especially if it is there children because it is akin to being told your parents religion/culture isn't good enough or inferior to another, and you know narcissists can't have that.

Some things for the verminous D&C jewish shills in this thread to consider.

Every European Axis nation was fighting to defend Christian Europe from international jewry/zionism.

The only white nations left are those that still regard Christianity as their foundational religion of the country.

Christianity was from its very foundations borne and built on opposing and resisting international jewry, to counter the Satanic practitioners of the Talmud

The only people and nations that ever try to pervert and interpret Christianity as anything anti-white are those whose entire lives were fed bullshit from jewish TV, jewish historians and jewish college professors.

Europe was white and maintained its racial identity all the way for thousands of years until the final blow after WWII with the Vatican II reformation, a PUNISHMENT inflicted on the church for siding with the Axis resistance.

From there the Frankfurt school program of Cultural Marxist critical theory was unleashed in the West in schools, media and all judeo-freemason controlled governments of the West.

Hitler didn't even start the movement in 1933, the European wide resistance to jewry took place in the mid to late 1800s, Hitler's Germany was simply the culmination of the previous 50 years of Christian Europe uniting to fight the jews.

[jewish resource]
Sept 11th, 1882, Dresden - World's First Anti-semitic Conference
http:// jewishcurrents.org/september-11-the-first-international-anti-semitic-conference/

There's plenty more but so many jews in here pretending that ISIS isn't isreal and that Christianity was somehow anti-white.

It's quite simply the most jewish bent logic ever expressed and only possible when a forum is overwhelmed by teams of organised jewish hasbara.

Holla Forums is being swamped with isreal kike shills, championing every jewish/neo-con globalist zionist politician, pretending every Mossad false flag isn;t conducted by jews and cheering on jewish isreali Mossad operatives like Anders (((behring)))Breivik and Geert Wilders etc.
This is astroturfing beyond the point of acceptance/

Mods - We need some serious de-fumigation round here.

Some undoubtedly were. But don't forget that christians were desperate to distance themselves from him in the years after the war. What's a little fraud when the reputation of christianity is at stake?


Perhaps, but those are second-hand accounts, and I am inclined to disregard them in light of Hitler's own words, actions, etc.

I have no doubt that Hitler was critical of the way christianity was practiced.IIRC he once stated envy of the muslims having a faith more suitable for a warlike people.

Here's my personal hypothesis: Hitler was a christian to the core, but like Luther, he wanted changes. I suspect (with zero evidence) that he, like Martin Luther, would at some point have nailed a thesis of his own to a church door. A thesis in which he outlined a new christianity more appropriate for the third Reich.


If Hitler faked his christianity, he did such a good job of it that he may as well have been a christian. He acted like a christian his entire life. Nothing he did ran contrary to christianity or the way it had been practiced in the past. Furthermore, his followers were for the most part christians, catholics and protestants.

Go back to /christcuck/ and ban everyone who calls you out for citing jewish lies in marxist books.

Europe was pretty shitty during the dark ages OP, after the fall of Rome.

Likewise, the Islamic world was once a great empire, they did spread their borders and conquer land, but so did every empire of that time.

the difference is that the west had a renaissance and an enlightenment that reignited western civilization and the Muslims did not. the Islamic world pretty much went full-ISIS after the mongols fucked them and they destroyed all the books the mongols didn't, and even banned books that were translated into Arabic and printed.


Really though the fact that a great civilization once existed in the middle east doesn't change anything, Islam still is what it is today…culturally incompatible with modern society.

That's bad historiography. I don't think any historian would believe the public pronouncements of a politician over the personal accounts of the men like Speer, Goebbels, and Rosenberg who knew him. Speer's testimony is particularly valuable, as he and Hitler were good friends, and Speer was not an ideological hardliner on this like Bormann.

You can speculate all you want, but the Wikipedia article sums it up well:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

A period of European history that the contemporary juwes coined "the Dark Ages" to sully the time when Europe was mainly juden frei.

No, Wahhabism was a later creation, and groups like ISIS were historically rare in Islam. The Islamic world had its Golden Age during the period of the Dark Ages and early Medieval period. At that point, its civilization was superior to that of the Christian west, and it did not fall deeply behind until the 19th century. The Islamic world was actually more secular than the West for centuries. There were famous Medieval atheists in the Islamic world, which was inconceivable in the West at that time.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Maʿarri

All Abrahamic religions are shit, but people somehow imagine that Islam is and always was worse than Christianity. Often, it was better or at least equal. If the people from the Middle East fell behind that, that probably had more to do with other factors.

No, they weren't. Plus, Jews were under the protection of the church during this period:


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Gregory_I_and_Judaism

I'm not just talking about his public pronouncements, but his entire life. Everything Hitler said and did was in line with him being a faithful christian. All primary sources portray him as a christian. By contrast, Table Talk was put together by people who may or may not have had an agenda.

It is fully possible to be a devout christian and still critical and even hostile to the church. Just look at Martin Luther, who ended up founding a major branch of christianity as a result of his disagreement with the current practices.

Dude, you didn't even read excerpt I posted from the link, let alone visit it, and are just posting shit.

I think it's worse historiography to ignore the source material's root.

Further, the context of the information you're referencing came from sources that are unreliable at best. Goebbels killed himself as the war was drawing to a close. Information bearing the same marks of credibility have been used to repeatedly claim the holocaust happened despite no evidence of such a genocide outside of "survivor" testimony. Much like the Nuremberg trials, the usually methods of sound inquiry have been completely suspended on post-war documentation.

The religious debate is secondary in this instance, knowing and purposeful deception is easy to spot. Obfuscation is the weapon of the enemy.

You realize there are different sects of Judaism and not all of them strictly follow the Torah, right?


Hassidic/Orthodox Jews are doing a number to the public school system and the area I live in has a pretty large number of them.

The viking raids/pillaging was the viking response to what happened to the southern Germanic tribes

None of them follow the Torah. Biblical hebrews no longer exist. No jew believes the Torah; the definition of ‘jew’ is ‘follows the talmud’.

Even if this were true, so what? We are not in the middle ages anymore muslims need to grow up or stay in their mudholes.

Are you stupid? Burger education? Christian armies slaughtered their Aryan brothers in religious wars and forced the surviving civilians to convert by the sword

Like that has any relevance of any kind.

We have multiple first-person accounts and quotes from Hitler by those closest to him that he was hostile to Christianity. And then we have Christian apologists on Holla Forums who can't deal with that.

etymonline.com/index.php?term=jew

Yeah, yeah, blah blah, we're not discussing the race right now.

Saying that no Jew believes the Torah is like saying that no Christian believes the Old Testament.

It's true that The talmud is the most important book for them though. Although the talmud is basically a long text describing how any line in the OT should be deciphered in the most perverted and corrupted way. The jew is basically an inversion of everything good. An inversion of truth, etc.

That is why everything is upside down in society because you have a bunch of rats specifically trying to make it so well helped by their shabbos goys the freemasons.

If it's not taken down by now, the talmud should be in /pdf/ i believe it is called. It is the only talmud online that isnt censored as it was part of elisabeth dilling's website before it was taken down.

I would love to put my hands in a real talmud and not the censored ones. I never found an uncensored one before.

Could you share, please? Where can I find it?

8ch.net/pdf/res/534.html

>u.nya.is/soebow.7z

Wayback machine doesn't have it either.

Google or Bing won't give any useful mirror.

I follow Hermeticism on principle. I was born in a deeply catholic society (I'm mediterranean), so I am culturally catholic. If I absolutely had to take up some type of paganism it would be the Roman/Greek pantheon. Here in Iberia the local Old Gods were forgotten due to our very successful romanization. You could make the case for the Celtic gods, but it doesn't feel quite right.

Turning back seems impossible though, we are quite the zealous type and those cathedrals are just too great.

Are you implying that pre-Christian Europe never engaged in torture? kek

It works fine man, just tested. Maybe try another browser.

Try a different browser, it works, i got it

Then it's time to create a new, greater God(s) and religion. One just for Europe and Europeans and their diaspora.

But the romans were not european. Romans hated europeans because they saw them as primitive.

That's something you do after kikes are gone, you cannot make a religion impervious to Jews that people will readily accept in the current climate. Simply won't happen and you'd be wasting immense amounts of time and energy trying to get anything off the ground let alone make it into small-cult status.

As far as Christianity branches go, Orthodox is probably the only good one because they're the least pozzed. Well, unless you count the Amish and Mennonites but I don't think you guys including myself would like being without modern conveniences for so long.

Catholics are pozzed as hell thanks to their Pope Pozz.

Protestants and Evangelicals are the biggest kike lovers and cucks on earth despite so much kikes utterly hate Christians. They're probably a much of Masochists or something.

The whatever else don't really matter and the Morons, I mean Mormons aren't even Christians or apart of Christianity. They added a new book and teachings and prophet making them an entirely new religion altogether no matter how much they try to rationalise magic underwear and everybody gets their own fucking planet and Jesus is a space alien. Keep in mind there's some good family values stuff in Mormons but recently they've gotten unbearably pozzed.

But really, best to do away with all these YHWH religions.

The only thing it's right on is when a Jew wrote that niggers having shitskin is the result of being a race cursed by God himself because they're all descended from humanity's first murderer. It would explain the criminal murderous behaviour of niggers so bravo Jews. You at least wrote that part right. Same with murdering and sterilising niggers in Israel. Maybe we'll keep it in the religions of the future just so everyone knows about the vice and rotten seed of the nigger.

I won't enable javascript, lol. I got it anyway, mirroring now, when I'm finished, I will upload the bulk of it somewhere for your delight, but I won't post the link so you noseys could take it down.


Your divide-and-conquer argument is so stupid it reminds me of the average IQ of kikes.

user this is almost universally true.

The no Christian believes the Old Testament part I mean.

Honestly, I'd forego all of these modern conveniences if that meant enabling my volk to live self-sufficient agrarian lives free from subhuman interference. Fuck the Abrahamic religions, but that's the sort of lifestyle we should be aiming for anyway. Urban living destroys humans. That doesn't actually mean that technology has to be abandoned, but the feudalistic model of homesteads organized into clan communities in support of ethnostates is the traditional way endorsed by the most noble and insightful groups of our race. You can't make a volk happy with the empty materialism underlying the current paradigm.

Every time.

This would explain so much of the unhappiness in modern society. I also remember reading an article in a woman's magazine in my country where the guess lady doctor says the reason why women's happiness has only gone down since woman's liberation and is at an all time low in modern times when it should supposedly be the opposite thanks to all the gains for women is because women traded family for money and women have a biological need for family far more than even men do. Where a man can sleep with a woman and never call back again without a care a woman wants more and is more hurt than things like emotional infidelity even more than sexual infidelity. No amount of material and money will fill the void women feel in their hearts and yearning for the stable family they've always wanted and dreamed for. Modern society is a sham. You live only to work for capital but nothing meaningful to spend that capital on. All these lost youth today lost and without purpose or identity. Not family, not country, not even your volk and by extension yourself. Only emptiness.

We have a very serious problem of overpopulation.

Germany, or Italy, or England, can't sustain their native population without food imports. There is not enough land in those countries to feed themselves.

And leftists think those countries don't have enough people, so they have to import shitskins?

From the moment those countries can't trade their industrialized products for food, they starve. It is gonna happen soon, because their economies will falter under the shitskin threats and parasitism.


Your proposal would thus be doable if, and only if, the Earth's population is reduced to some 500 million and every man would be forced to feed his family through his own plot of land.

No more supermarkets. No more bananas coming from the tropics, etc.

This is a good thing. I have wondered for a long time if we would ever get our people on track before it was too late. This place is a very important idea-making and idea-breaking ground. I was worried some years ago that we might not be successful. I worried a bit less after the Mantra and its potential to free the Volk-body from wordism (literally the merchant in your head), but even Old Bob's valiant effort was not going to help the casualties–we were looking at a likely huge casualty ratio and a massive death of civilization, which the memes (and the resurgence of kek) have made plain.

As more of our thinking people wake up more and more, it is heartening to think off all we might save and all the good we might do. Even a few years ago, such plain talk would get b&, even here.

I hope we can get our Volk back onto workable, sane, sensible White ideology without dogma, sooner, rather than later. Most normal White people outside cities already think in this manner anyway. It is one of my most important projects, now that we have seeded the term "anti-white," scorched the kosher political landscape, and successfully reviled the cuck. May we have victory.

Christianity on Holla Forums was always a flash in the pan. First we worshiped Hitler, then Paul, then ditched Paul for Kek and then our handful of Christians (mostly new converts, I should add) got really butthurt and now they're coming to terms with reality as more people start telling them to peddle their bullshit elsewhere.

The time between 800 and 1000 was probably the best time for europe. All start there, your language, your nation, the base of your local culture, base of classic music, romanic churchs works like social centers, and the mentality was " we work toghether we party toghether" with the beggining of the traditional local festivities.

when roman empire fell, 70% land in europe was in someway public, and the rest to nobility and clergy, there was no commerce. But after a centurys the powers start to take the land with fire and blood and now we are here.

All Jews are bad, christcuck. You will never understand this because you follow a Jewish religion, worship a literal Jew, and follow a book written by Jews. Jew-lovers like you are the reason they are a problem for us and have been for hundred of years.

Of course the explanation for the schema of oblivion which is our current world goes on quite a bit more because nearly every aspect of society has been warped in such unnatural ways, but you've got hold of the tail of the beast firmly. Once you can spot the illusion which has been woven, the answer itself is revealed by observing the process of its weaving. The nobility for which we should be striving is made obvious merely by considering the reversal of the corruptions by which the current system was derived.


It truly is a troubling puzzle to try to understand how to bring about a restoration of the correct virtues when so much of society itself has been built over a false foundation. I've come to a more optimistic position though; I think the path of enacting that restoration will align with the methods by which our peoples can be pulled from the edge of the cliff. In a sense, there is no greater narrative possible than the reversal of this dire hour, and so the world which has been entrapped by compelling illusions can also only be freed by the fulfillment of that undeniable spectacle.

...

The Bible addresses women directly, which makes it a feminist document. Women should not be taught to read, so anything written for them is feminist in that it presumes they will be literate and read it.

This guy gets it. Christcuckoldry is a childish and materialistic garbage religion, just like Judaism and Islam. We need to be done with it and return to a real Aryan spiritual viewpoint.

Hahahahahahaha, this is what christkikes actually believe

Ancient Jews are polar opposites to modern kikes The old testament is pretty much just added to the bible to show how much Christ pissed off Jews. After they abandoned the 2nd temple in 66 AD they became Pharisees, from the root word which means "To separate" in Hebrew.

If Christians are good goys, why does the Talmud say Christ is burning in hell?

No, Christianity just made Europeans more Judaized, which is why Europe is in decline now, and has been even as far back as when 99% of people were still Christian. Remember the decline began while Europe was christian. This is because Christianity is a poison that crippled the European spirit.

All of Christianity is babby-tier theology. Compared to Aryan religions, all Jewish religions are childish nonsense.

Because Jews are still butthurt over Jesus, obviously. Are you implying that Jews view their good goys with respect?

They have always been a disgusting race according to every culture except their own and the Cucktian culture born from one of their cults. The bible is not a historical document, it is Semitic propaganda through and through.

The Germanic Tribes warred to find the best who would rule the realm. It comes from Germanic Mythos anyway, Teutons were doing exactly what their ancestors wanted to do. They even got great weapons from Rome, since Rome believed conversion meant they now could own Germania, it didn't last long when they Protested.

Unlike the newer religeons its more of a matter of who you are versus where you are or what you believe. "Germany wasn't given away but taken", I believe Hitler said something like that.

Though you should use Gaut/God instead of Yahweh/YHWH to keep with this Germanic tradition.

When your gods are not all powerful but real you must be able to make difficult decisions that they will honor. They will only leave when there are no more who are left that they created, then it will be domesday

Lol no. Have you read the old testament? Ancient kikes acted exactly like kikes do today.

The old testament is the entire basis of jesus's claim to being the jewish messiah.

The root of it all is kikes. Get rid of them and the world is free.

The gods are not representations of elements, but rather the elements themselves, it is only the stories which are esoteric. Ἠέλιος for example is the sun, not some abstract deity that rules the sun. In such you most likely believe in several "pagan" gods yourself, just not their divinity, or the traits, and stories attributed to them. Western religion had always been esoteric, what with the mystery schools and so forth, that can be seen even in the beginnings of Christianity which continued to develop Platonism, but within the christian frame. It seems like some strange ever changing plane wrought with grey areas, because that is how it was.

What other people said about Hitler's faith matters less to me than what he said and did himself.

Again; being hostile to the church does not in any way mean being anti-christian. Are you sure your second-hand sources (Speer, Bormann etc) were quoted correctly? Are you sure they did not have agendas of their own to push?

Nobody really cares about the contents of their holy books. They just to wave them about a lot.

Nigger what? Even when kikes were known as the Habiru their neighbors still thought of them as shifty fucking merchants

Hitler was more of a deist if anything
youtu.be/x90kI0zjI7E
can't embed it because someone already posted it a month ago in another thread

Druids were gone by the 2nd century, larpagan. A lot of the people converted peacefully since the religions got synchretinized.
This modern notion of christians butchering people is being harped on by masons and jews.

You're ignoring a host of facts that destroys your argument. Simply put, .
As with Judaism, Catholicism isn't what it claims to be, nor is it what it is today. I recommend the Lion's Book of the History of Christianity.

Theodosius the great motherfucker, you know him? Or Justinian the great or Karolus the great and I could mention many more. Crusades were a thing much earlier than 1000s ad and the monastic orders first appearance. Butchering people to spread this abrahamic religion was OK at the time, just not for the "pagans".

Yeah it does. It means that the Diaries were published post war.

Those first hand accounts are all tainted for the reasons I mentioned. It's a little naive to believe that those who have constantly lied about that time in history would just "find" a whole bunch of accounts about how Hitler just loved kicking puppies.

I see a lot of very angry anti-Christians on here, which is fine, but neither side should use tainted material or buy into the hollyjew nazi stereotype. There are great white heroes of all stripes, Charlemagne, Jan Sobieski, or Bayard were Christian. Arminius, Caesar, Eric the Red were not.

Wrong.
Popculture is simply wrong.
Christianity always spread peacefully except for cases of human sacrifice and defense. Between Slavs who had no difficulty syncretizing Jesus with their monolatrically revered single god who plays fisticuffs with Veles over Germanics who simply didn't like Roman (no matter their religion) to Celtics whose druids themselves burned and destroyed all writing so that they won't fall into the hands of the missionaries.

The Crusades only became a problem after the installation of the Inquisition, because people got increasingly paranoid of other cults thriving in the heart of their nation. If they reacted sooner, the cult of Islam wouldn't exist and MENA would still be white. Instead, nobles fought amongst each other - something Christianity wanted to abolish in order to unite the European race - and the sheer alienness of deserts held knights back from adventuring to take back the "holy land".

The holy land was the prime goal for the Crusades because that's where Jerusalem, temporary seat of the sultan, and Mecca lay.

So many shills. Remember how nice it was post election. Who's the new paymaster?

None are necessary. Liberals spout that to shut down any discourse.
As I've said here multiple times: When someone tries to shut down anything respond to them with absolute dominance. Their actions are nothing more than a shit test.

Lets get to the root of what someone who uses this argument is trying to do.
The idea their trying to plant is that muslims are less advanced than christian nations, and thus need to be given the opportunity to work out their internal social issues.
People who use this line of logic are oblivious to time, so it's not a good angle of attack.

You're best bet is to get your opponent to question whether or not Islam is "good".
To ascertain whether or not something is "good", look at it's results.
Look at the results of Christianity in what's classified as "The Western World". Less crime, more community, better standard of living.
The Christian world has united under common goals and achieved seemingly impossible feats, whereas the Muslim world has segregated and fought amongst themselves over every little thing.
The only time they've ever united is over oil, and even then, they undermine each other for personal gain.

And if they don't accept this, call them an out of touch, sheltered faggot. Belittle them for their stupidity and ignorance. Call them a fool for destroying the culture that birthed them.

If a frog had wings he wouldn't bump his ass, moron.

Well said, would also add that accusations of intellectual laziness in considering two religions to be the same just because they broadly fit into a single category is a disservice.


As you said, they're trying to shut down debate in a kind of clever way. They're basically attempting to completely close off an entire subsection of debate, attack on that basis.

Easy.

archive.org/details/MarcusEliRavage-ARealCaseAgainstTheJews
archive.org/details/MarcusEliRavage-CommissaryToTheGentiles

Just like your (((Christ))), huh?

Because Christian Africa and South America are so prosperous, right? The thirty years war never happened either I guess. Hebus didn't give the west its prosperity.

Except the first crusade happened almost a thousand years ago. Muslims are way behind on evolving into civilized beings.

Not like ISIS but it wasn't peaceful, which isn't necessarily a good thing (being peaceful, I mean).

If Christians started sacrificing people tomorrow during mass, what would comparing that to ancient Aztec noble savages accomplish? It's ok now because some group did it a long time ago?

not reading through 700 replies i'm
lazy but take a look at Charlemagne's attempts to Christianize the Scandinavian and Germanic areas, certainly wasn't peaceful. Also take a look at the Teutonic Order and their attempts to Christianize the Baltic areas. Wouldn't call it red-pilled but acknowledging human interest in the guise of religious affairs can be enlightening

>>>/his/

*git educated
>>>/his/
also check'em

Hardly anything was peaceful during those times. It was kill or be killed. If christians were the cucks they are today, there wouldn't be a western world. Islam would've conquered everything.

It varies. The violence was initiated by the pagans usually. The crusades into Eastern Europe are an exception though.

In Scandinavia it spread because the vikings admired Jesus' sacrifice. During 700-850's monks that tried to spread Christianity in Norway were killed. This stopped with Håkon the Good, and later Olav the Holy started spreading it partially by the sword (he also got revenge on a lot of people, so it was a mixed bag of reasons).

You have been sold a lie, violence by outsiders did not spread Christianity to any parts of Scandinavia. The Danes were partially pressured by outside forces to adopt Christianity

According to my, truth be told amateur knowledge, it depends on which part of Europe are you talking about.

Within borders of Roman Empire, Christianity spread non violently after Constantine the Great made Christianity legal. If you're talking about areas which were in the Barbaricum, the process of spreading was mainly limited to the aristocracy. Nobody really gave two shits about whom your average peasant Sven prayed to, Odin, Dažbog or your Jesus Christ, what mattered is whom the kings and lords prayed to. Whether they forced their religious views on their subjects or not it really came down to king/lord.

In Heimskgrinla or the Chronicle of Kings of Norway there are accounts of defeated kings being forced to undergo religious conversion as part of their subjugation. There are also accounts in the same source of certain kings forcing their subjects to convert to Christianity, which did cause those lords that didn't want to be converted to rally together in opposition, so to say that for example there Christianity spread non violently, isn't really true as there was warfare and combat involved in the process.

Still is this really EARLY Christianity? I mean we are talking here in case of Scandinavia a period of 900+ years after the faith already began and 600+ years after it was made legal by Constantine. By comparison within 100 years of that goatfucking pedophile the goatfuckers had entire North Africa, entire Middle East and a bigger part of Spain under their control already, all gained thru warfare and conquest so to try and say that religion that in the first 100 years of it's existence conquered much of the Mediterranean is the same as religion that spend the first 100 years mainly surviving thru word of mouth and secret meetings in the catacombs of Roman cities is just plainly wrong. Mechanisms via which the two spread in their early days are greatly different.

I haven't browsed 8/pol/ since last year. This place has turned into fucking cuckchan.

The only caveat I would add is that the converted pagan nobility were acting entirely under what they assumed to be their natural rights. Converting other kings and chiefs in war was common for the European pagans, it's why in some areas Odin was worshiped as the primary deity and in other places Thor and why worship of figures like Ymir faded over time. If a king serving Thor won against a king serving Odin it was taken to mean that either Thor was more powerful or at least that Thor was actively blessing his worshiper in battle while Odin had not been and that not only was it practical to convert to Thor worship but there was a kind of divine right to submitting to the conquering kings god of choice.

The pagan converts in this way were behaving as they always had been, not in a uniquely christian "crusader" mentality. A noble who refused to worship his kings god was in rebellion, plain and simple and were treated as rebels.

It can be difficult for modern people to realize the absolute absence of a separation between the secular and spiritual for people of the past but that's how they saw the world, even more so in the pagan world where even things we would consider childishly superstitious were a matter of fact.

Yes. And cuckchan devolved even further, so the perception that this place is better continues to prevail.
Also, we're experience a never-ending influx of newfags and cuckchaners since 8ch started getting mentioned in (((news))).
Those Gold-Standard, Free Market™, An-Cap, Civic Nationalists that think this is a Capitalist board are the most cancerous of the batch in my opinion.

Every imageboard that is taken over affects its conquerors that much more. Absorbing Holla Forums's National Socialist anti-kike lore will change the anons who hang around here, and the next migration will do the same again.

Yeah, our gods can't raise people from the dead or prevent Jews from catching on fire or conjure bread from the sky - they're not frauds like your murderous Jew book. Congratulations on your "success."

vimeo.com/34869601

youtube.com/watch?v=MZVY-pGDsN4

That's a true statement… Grown ass adults have no problem playing in traffic.

youtube.com/watch?v=_q6chUtSef4


The gospels are clearly not really Judaic - but written to a Judaic audience.

I can reconcile the gospels with paganism…

youtube.com/watch?v=TJjIgvNa6GY

Christians destroyed native pagan sites and artefacts. Quite analogous to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_cultural_heritage_by_ISIL in that.

Early Christianity received lots of hatred for targeting the uneducated public instead of upper class. (Subversion.)

"I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a King of infinite space…"

youtube.com/watch?v=XkU23m6yX04

Why do you faggots keep falling for these kind of D&C threads?

How reckless, arent you afraid to hurt people with those edges`?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I

He thought Christianity would help integrate those immigrating Goths he had been forced to let live unintegrated in the Empire after the
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_War_(376–382)

He saw the old Roman pagan Senate-loving class as the main enemy.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Frigidus

He was wrong. His new Christian Rome, full of Christian former slaves was as effective as Haiti.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Verden

"Read the Bible." That's all you need to do to shut these kike shills up.

jfc look at those exceptionally large cockroaches they're holding in those blankets.

Reminder that atheicucks are marxist libfags at their core and will say and do anything to achieve their godless world, even if it means pretending to be Holla Forumsacks or adopting a victim complex about the conversion of barbarians into civilized men.


Turned non-white savages into beings slightly similar to human beings with decent architecture, so it was a miracle in itself that they got that far.


Celticfag plz.

This seems like a pretty accurate description of the rise of Christianity. Besides the Roman massacres on the Lusitanians, I'd like to add that the Visigoths did rebel in 147BC under Viriatus' command, and through innovative guerrilla tactics manage to defeat several roman legions. After that they in fact allowed themselves to be ruled by Rome, because Viriatus couldn't see them being able to hold back roman conquest for much longer. He was betrayed after he accepted a deal with Rome, and was murdered by Audax, Ditalcus and Minurus who were ambassadors sent by Viriatus to negotiate peace. They had accepted a bribe in order to kill him, and after they completed the task they returned to Rome where Servilius Caepio refused to pay them saying 'Rome does not pay traitors' and killing them afterwards.
It was the first successful rebellion against the roman empire, and inspired other european pagan tribes through its guerrilla warfare.

I like how threads on Christianity don't get bumplocked by the shitskins if they're negative.

The basis of Western Civilisation isn't Jesus Christ; it is the likes of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, etc.
Now I ask you Holla Forums, did they live before or after Christ?
Did they worship the same God as Jesus, his followers, and all who came after him?
Did not alliances and leagues in Europe not exist before the advent of Christ?
Was Western Civilisation not great before Christianity? Did we just wander in darkness on the ground before Christ brought Civilisation to Europe from the Middle East?


I'm not a liberal faggot and I'm not an atheist either but what you espouse is highly questionable. That said anyone calling Christianity evil or without merit or achievement in the advancement of Western Civilisation is also wrong. The very wide spread of knowledge is credited to Christianity in how heavily it motivated countless scholars in the past 2000 years in Europe and the invention of the printing press which changed everything forever for the common man.

But again, I would still like to see us move beyond the Christian and Abrahamic age. It has outlived its usefulness to the point even the Pope himself is beyond redemption, promoting countless blasphemies and heretical teachings. Christianity is no more, none of these religions are.

Philosophers tended to develope a pantheistic view. They distinguished between a "body", a "mind", and a "law" of that pantheistic god-world. This has later been refered to as the ALL, the Nous, and the Logos, respectively.

Christianity tried to unite Europa. It managed, but there was some collateral damage. The Crusades turned the faithful increasingly paranoid and they founded the Inquisition to force Jews to eat pork. When pagans said something that reminded them of muslims, they instigated pagan hunts.

Pretty sad, to be honest.

NEDM

I think every Christian knows the golden rule, the ten commandments, and lessons from the Bible such as Jesus forgiving Mary Magdalene, the good samaritan, a camel going through the eye of a needle being more likely than a rich person getting into heaven. What did you learn from Socrates that is comparable?

Are you friggin kidding me?

In 1958, the church came into an Eclipse. All the popes since then have been crypto jews.

Christians are Not Jews. The JEWS REJECTED CHRIST. If people start realising that the Jews have been the enemy of christians from day 1, jews would be fucked. So Masons (jews) and jews, infilitrate the church as their duty as jews to destroy it.

How do you do that? You become pope, you do a council and start, slowly, diluting all the morals so there is no difference between being a Christian or being a Mudslim.

Make no fucking mistake. The Jews rejected christ. Christians emancipated the jjew "god". They were driven by the "higher God" the God of all things which is NOT the same as the jewish god. If you hear otherwise, it's because there are cryptojews trying to tell you it's the same thing. Don't fall for the jew tricks. Jesus called them the Synagogue of Satan. The jews rejected them.

These same jews that rejected him are now in control of the vatican. They want Jesus to become irrelevant. Tell me, how often do you here about the pope actually talking about Jesus? Not much. Don't worship the Jews, they killed Jesus and would and will do it again if they can.

The Catholic church is undergoing an eclipse. Wake the fuck up.

To add on this:


So as you see, the church is leaning towards the jews. Why is that? Because the past popes are jews. The relationship is now: "Christians love jews because we come from them!" while "We jews would kill Jesus again, the imposter".
Christians do NOT come from the jews, they come from the worship of the most high God which is NOT the abrahamic god. Thats why they killed him.

The final crusade is looming. No one can deny it anymore.

Could you eludicate this?

You either don't know that Ptolemaic Dynasty appeared after Alexander's conquest or can't express it. Either way, you're retarded.

Yes.

The key figure for Christians was not Abraham, but Melchizedek.
Melchizedek Was God's Priest. He worshipped most high God, or in other words, El Elyon. The King of Righteousness. Abraham meets him, and Melhcizedek blesses him. HOWEVER, Abraham, a fucking degenerate fool, then starts following what is now known as Yahew (Saturn Cult, Phallus cult). In exchange for sacrifices, he gets power on earth. This guy that gives him power, is Yahew, otherwise known as Satan.

Then Jesus, the Son of God comes along. He follows El Elyon (the most High God). That’s why he despises the Jews and calls them the “Synagogue of Satan” and tells the to fuck off his Fathers Temple. The Hebrews (Abrahamic descendents) called Jesus, the priest of Melhcizedek. He was not one of them.

So Christianity actually outdates Abraham, once you know the Melhcizedek happenings. However, they wont tell you that. They will never tell you that Jesus worshipped the same God. So the Hebrew Christians emancipated Yahew and started worshiping El Elyon, the God of Jesus, the father of Evertyhing.
Jesus felt compassion for the Hebrews and the Pagans. But he was not cucked, he called them by their name, followers of their father “Satan”.