Anarchists vs. non-local problems

How anarchists propose to deal with immigration

How anarchist deal with a counter revolution

How anarchists propose to fight climate change

Other urls found in this thread:

davidharvey.org/2015/06/listen-anarchist-by-david-harvey/
marxists.org/archive/bensaid/2002/07/leaps.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

davidharvey.org/2015/06/listen-anarchist-by-david-harvey/

Not knowing history this hard.

Desertion was a bigger problem for the USSR than for Spain or Ukraine or rojava etc

And finally, on the Leninist alternative:
“Leaps, Leaps, Leaps”: Lenin and Politics
marxists.org/archive/bensaid/2002/07/leaps.htm

Cuban Revolution was voluntary soldiers

Are you saying that a voluntary soldier can't just take some days off from the frontline?

How is this an argument for Spain or Ukraine or rojava again? Obviously some people want nothing to do with defending the revolution (or their homeland, for that matter). Logically this means that a purely voluntary model will have much fewer numbers. And this is positive, how?

...

Sauce on webm? Lost my shit at scarlet F and women being set on fire.

That's my two cents
Somebody else refute the other ones I'm lazy

It's almost like in most historical examples they would have been exectuted like any other army but people just didn't for the precise reason that they actually wanted to be there, or something

...

It's from Xavier: Renegade Angel
The show was on Adult Swim and was made by the same guys who did Wonder Showzen

Read Bookchin
Read Apo

I love these threads, it always shows how little Leninist (and this post is clearly made by a Leninist) know about anarchist societies have actually functioned and their complete and total refusal to learn how they did function, usually denying they functioned at all.

...

It's kind of funny how marxists are to anarchists what politically illiterate burgers are to socialists.
meanwhile marxists say shit like

never seen a Marxist say that

Yes, these are very convincing counter arguments.

wew lad

Lurk more

I know of David Harvey, It reads like someone who very clearly does not know what anarchist actually want, or what they have historically have done in an unbiased context, as they are very clearly anti-anarchist by any mean possible, much like yourself.

The two aren't contradictory.


I was here from day 1. For instance, I created your fucking flag that is misused by self-proclaimed geniuses like yourself every day.

You have litterly the same argument only reversed.

The part I quoted isn't Harvey's work. It's Ealham's, who is an anarchist historian.

I want referring to the quoted text, i was referring to the article you linked too.

wasnt*

sure you are new friend : ^ )

: ^ )

Logically consistent.

Logically consistent.

Logically consistent.

(Not to mention historically accurate.)

when you teach reading comprehension to the kid with the "I'm well read, you are not" flag

Name one political movement to ever exist that did not at some time and in some level go against some of their own principles depending on circumstance. If you can name one, i will eat my own shit.

Except the argument he was making is
on to the next one
It's OK new friend. Keep lurking and you'll eventually be smart enough to post on here ; ^ )

They arnt new, theyre just clouded by ideology.

...

...

READ MANIFESTO YOU EGOIST FEDORA WEARING CUCK
jk love you fam

...

kek

Hey, don't lump me together with the tankies now.

I'm sorry marxist friend. As long as you understand what anarchism is and don't strawman it constantly, then I consider you to be my comrade

The climate change tipping points have tipped.

Now the outcry is for pork barriers. Put our good ol boys back to work am I right?

Did you really think muh liters wanted to *reverse* climate change??

tbh the only way to have full, non-statist communism is with technology much more advanced than our own. That's why I think the socialist transition stage will have to be pretty long, until all the forces of the past system have disappeared and we have the technology to automate everything. But until then we need a workers' state and proletarian dictatorship. Anarchism can't work because it's basically just saying "I don't want to get involved with capitalists and their states so I'm gonna found my own communes and free territories" which is doomed to fail because you might not be want to be involved in the state apparatus, but that doesn't mean the state apparatus doesn't want to be involved with you (by which I mean arrest and kill you, of course).

No, we need to make the existing level of technology accessible to the masses. It doesn't matter how advanced our tech is if only porky has his hands on it. Otherwise you're just making class divisions easier to enforce.


The poster that described tankies as how normalfags are to socialists was spot on. I'd laugh, but we keep having this thread and it isn't funny anymore.

sorry what's "Apo"?

Abullah Ocalan

Thanks gomrade. I try

gotta admit, that was pretty funny. shit post tho.

Why not?

Just feel like telling everyone that Burning Man is actually one giant uneducated hippy shithole and that it's had nothing to do with Anarchism forever

thats fascis

Terribly meme'd, my shitposting friend. Webm was funny tho.