Redpill Refresh For New Fags on Homosexuality

Interesting theory, but ultimately it reads like broscience.

t.

Fuck that, my cat loves eating proper meat

this

I think fags just have low T and high E, perhaps were molested, antisocial, degenerate, demoralized, etc.

congratulations op

now so long as nobody eats the shit they find in the litterbox, nobody will catch the evil homosexuality causing brain parasite!

It's actually far more complex than that. This is how it can be transmitted in only one example.
In fact t.Gondii can also be hereditary which is the case with nose Protozoan Parasitic infections. For example you could have a Roman ancestor from the 11th century who was engaging in homosexual acts and thus pass the parasite onto his future offspring or alter their genetics all together. That's what we're seeing in clinical tests. Bringing this up on campus is extremely controversial however because it relates to sub species and that opens the doors to the SJWs shouting racism.

So why aren´t humans attracted to cat urine then? I don´t see a lot of guys trying to fuck cats or rubbing their dick on litterboxes.

Also, T. goondi gives humans Toxoplasmosis, and homosexuality isn´t a symptom of that sickness.

And then there is also a much simpler reason why this virus shouldn´t have been spread that much. If it is spread only among homos, how do "former straight" people get it? They usually discover their gayness as a child or after having sex with a straight person (that logically couldn´t have been infected) and deciding its not for them. Its not t. gondii, so its not their cat. Where do they get this virus from?
Air - not likely, otherwise we would have thousands of cases of spontaneous homosexuality
Water - same reason
Rodents - far too few contacts with humans to allow for such a far spreading of the disease
Blood - same reason

I think its broscience, but you made a good effort.

See
There's a dozen sources from decades of clinical research

I'm a student at tOSU, and we are actually making progress in the area of Toxoplasma Gondii. It does seem there is not only a direct correlation between homosexuality and this Protozoan but the parasite itself passed from host to host in a manner we've never seen. From the outside it seems to lack a physical manifestation at all when being transmitted, so we are breaking ground on possibly and entirely new level of biological understanding from the molecular basis. I find it extraordinary to be alive in such a refreshing time.

The shit you describe is about insects and rodents who lose their disgust against a certain stimuli. It doesn´t make males fuck males, it has never occured in nature.
The conclusion you make is pretty broad, since even with animals, this shit has never occured. Thats what i call broscience.
Toxoplasmosis also doesn´t make humans gay. You can actually observe the symptoms.

Your theory also doesn´t explain how people get the virus and why so many. I think its a mental illness, which explains why only humans can be fags.

Conclusion: broscience, but creative.

Where my Bulgarian molbio nigger at?

So students are doing the research now?
So there are many gay people with Toxoplasmosis?
Swollen lymph nodes, Tachyzoites in blood

LARP more faggot. You don´t write like a student at all and there is literally no fact to back your bullshit up.

The problem I have always had with this theory is that men fucking each other in the ass doesn't spread the virus to cats. As cats are the main target, the virus shouldn't make men more attractive to shit-holes but to cats, no?

I'm in my fifth year, and this is something being researched across the Globe. OP did post some great links, and well, search engines are your friend.

Nice way of dodging your obvious lack of knowledge on the subject. The theory is broscience, you made it sound reasonable. I take it your grades aren´t that good.

And the degeneracy that makes men find other men sexually attractive is too variable and too complex for a single parasite to completely manipulate. Like this guy says, it's broscience.

jesus stop sperging out and derailing the thread, nobody is trying to LARP as a student ,OP has most likely studied this

'Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan, not a virus, bacterium, fungus, ayyy lmao ufo, or anything else.

Yes, definitely do that.

However, most anons here aren't doing a multi-minute surgical scrub "prep for going into the OR" technique, so I recommend you use inexpensive disposable nitrile gloves when changing the litter. Peel them off your hands so they end up inside out and throw them away. And wash your hands after that.

I've seen lab culture demonstrations that illustrate how little reduction in bacteria scrubbing hands with soap and water for 2 minutes does when compared to ethyl alcohol hand sanitizer. Culture plates touched by soap+water scrubbed hands grow tons of bacteria. Properly "sanitizered" hands touching plates grow very little.

The issue here is that while various authorities recommend sanitizer for toxoplasma (again, a protozoan) as an alternative to washing hands, I couldn't quickly find a study that confirms that standard alcohol-based sanitizer will kill toxoplasma. In the hospital they use hand sanitizer before & after examining patients, except when the patient has something sanitizer is ineffective with. Then they hope some quick soap & water will take care of it. Better than nothing, but…

Disposable nitrile gloves aren't too expensive and good to have around for other dirty tasks.

I strongly doubt that given the basic errors in classification of the parasite.

Exactly. What was your favorite hint? I'd choose the random, context-free link spam in . Oh, or the spectacular "muh 9%" logic failure in . Shit, nevermind, it's too hard to decide.

I actually refuted the theory with a bunch of arguments, to which i didn´t receive a response that could convince me in any way that this isn´t mere broscience. Also, i replied to a LARPer that didn´t add anything to the conversation to show that he doesn´t know shit.

Sage because this isn´t frontpage material.

Relevant information

also I've been on nofap for 16 days and counting

The logic failure is a big point. If 9% of newborn babies who carry toxoplasma5 would turn out gay, this would be a scientific fact by now.

Besides that, toxoplasmosis doesn´t make people gay. Its symptoms have been researched. "Spontaneous homosexuality" because of infection isn´t a thing.

Then the biggest point, homosexuality in nature isn´t a thing either. If it was a virus that made a species fuck their own sex, it would first occur in rodents and other species with a much more vulnerable immune- and nervous system before spreading to humans.

Therefore, i conclude that homosexuality is an unnatural invention by man that isn´t based on biology, but on psychotic perceptions, traumatic events and other mental problems.

Child abuse, probably. And the cat urine thing is probably due to fucked pheromone detection rather than anything specific to cat piss. Rats probably have a fear/disgust response to cat piss for survival purposes but T. gondii flips whatever gives a fear/disgust into sexual attraction. It doesn't look for the pheromone for cat piss and say "yeah, get off to this," it's probably more general than that. It makes sense when you remember the incidence of shit fetishism amongst fags, or their inclination towards bugchasing.

lel did you even read the post?

Shit, meant to quote

Don't react to him
shills use the word:
in all caps and such for a couple of days now.

T. gondii looks like it may warrant some more investigation at the very least.

The notion that homosexuality is the symptom of an infection of some kind is very interesting, especially when you consider that gay men spend quite a lot of time noodling around in each others' bumholes (an unusual activity for humans and immediately triggers a disgust reflex in most of us) and there is a massive microbiome that lives in there. A virulent critter in a faggot's battyhole would gladly hitchhike on another fudgepacker's weiner to get from host to host, enacting its own fecally-inspired variation of 14/88 to the tune of a high-pitched John Philip Sousa march.

The culprit could be a microbial pathogen. Or perhaps a virus. Or…use your imagination and come up with a compelling hypothesis, but look at the evidence and formulate something that seems to be consistent with everything you can find.

TBH child abuse seems like the first reason for it.
I know some lesbians and all were abused while young. Either by a violent father that gave such a bad representation of men or an overbearing mother that bound the girl's individuality to her.
Gays usually have a very strict father that put them down and forced them to connect with the mother more. Ergo they behave more like women and have same preferences.
It's fucking bizzare how much abuse happens in some homes.

Blaming it on some disease rather to the pervasive mental instability among the young due to abuse is retarded and a convenient misdirection.

Unless the way the t. gondii parasite accomplishes its swindle is by inciting vague suicidal, masochistic urges in its host, there is no way it could be connected to something as abstract as bugchasing. Don't be stupid, user.

Great way to get rid of the inconvinience that people who had straight sex or none at all their whole life become gay, but simply not true
I don´t buy it. Strongest point is still that the symptom of Toxoplasmosis isn´t "spontaneous homosexuality" and such a thing doesn´t exist.

kys, paranoid cuck

There are straight people that have a scat-fetish too, probably even more since there aren´t that many faggots

Yeah i think an unpleasant childhood, traumatic events, a repressed sexuality or other strains on the mind can trigger this mental illness. Just like transgenders strongly believe that changing their sex is a way out of their misery, gays believe that the other sex isn´t for them. It has nothing to do with a virus imo.

kys, Faggot shill.

Reported. Go back to your sewer and die, underage cancer.

Forgot to sage.

It makes rats attracted to cat piss. That fits "vague suicidal, masochistic urges" perfectly tbqh fam. It's also not as though there isn't precedent for organisms behaving in a suicidal manner, or making its host do so (Cordyceps). If anything, T. gondii might be codependent with HIV. Fags spread HIV, but can't spread it unless there are other fags to spread it to. T. gondii turns people into fags and HIV spreads rapidly through them.

But you're right about it not being spontaneous. Anyone arguing that is retarded.

Forgot to bump.

*slowly, almost contradicted myself in my own post.

brb killing myself

This is the one point where the NAXALT argument is actually valid, since the claim was that homosexuality is a virus and the people i described, which exist, can´t possibly have gotten infected by it as far as the theory goes.

No, it removes the natural fear/disgust response from it. They don´t automatically follow the smell of cat piss.
This is equal to straight men being able to watch fag porn without vomiting. Rats don´t start fucking other male rats, this has never happened in nature at all.

But the desensitization from cat urine of rats occurs as soon as the disease gets to a serious stage. If humans get toxoplasmosis, they don´t become faggots even when the disease is gone.
Its a false equivalency.

So when do you show your true colors and start spewing out that breivik isn't a freemason and israel is good and such?

Filtered

So Alex Jones was right? Should I start taking Living Defense?

SIMON ESE

I knew that i heard this idea before. No you shouldn´t shove your shekels up the cosher clown Jonesteins ass. This theory is BS, as you would see for yourself if you read the thread.

It is a plausible explanation.

What is wrong with thinking outside the box for a little while? Why fear what might be found? Most of us are just curious and considering hypothetical possibilities.

Yup jonestein was right just as the OP. Only paid shills can deny this now. You have to he a nigger with an iq of 80 to think this isnt true.

This is starting to make more sense, actually. If 1/3 of people are chronic carriers and only 10% of those develop to a serious stage (the """actual"""™ fag population), this would account for >muh NAXALT and would blow the spontaneity argument the fuck out. It probably overlaps with people inclined to be r-selected, though I'm just speculating here. Sick dubs btw.

Homosexuality is caused by an absent father and a maladjusted mother (also molestation)

Jokes on you, I already bought this like a week ago.

Are you sure the two things are even related? I'm not saying it's not true, but are you sure it doesn't just make you more sexually active or whatever? How does it even make a face more attractive?

I will say, while I dated a few girls through my teens, I did suddenly become much more successful with women in my early 20's after taking in a stray cat. I did notice also that while I was 5'10 at 18, by 30 I was 6'1, and my face has gotten a lot more masculine and appealing. I've also become much better at attracting women. I also used to be strictly monogamous but now stick to the "spare and a pair" principle, but I attributed this to a bad relationship nearly destroying me, and not wanting any single woman to be able to fuck me up that bad again.

Also, I have exclusive attraction to women. Assuming it was possible it had the effect of making you gay, I'd have to say clearly it can't change your already established orientation.

Besides, I think homosexuality is a disease of the mind, not a physical one. Virtually every homosexual has a story of childhood sexual abuse, this is how the illness is passed to them. The closest exception I can think of is a gay uncle I have, but the environment he was raised in is clearly what made him a fag. He was one of a set of twins, the other boy died. As a result of this (and his early physical weakness) his mother doted on him and pampered him and lavished him with affection. He was the only son with three sisters. Early health problems meant he had trouble going to the bathroom and was given daily enemas as a child, along with other stuff done to his butt. He was on top of all this a homely child, and initially walked with braces and didn't get along well even with his sisters because his mother favored him, so she was the majority of his social contact growing up and constantly took him out shopping and dressed him up.

On the other hand, I was molested by an elderly *woman* as a child who used her 5 year old grand daughter (I was 3) to lure me in, so maybe that initial early sexualization (the girl showed me her nipples and let me play with them and suck on them) is why I'm so overwhelmingly straight and a breast man.

The things turning the frogs "gay" are hormone blockers and synthetic hormones which are being dumped into the water and air because they are common in many products. What's actually happening is that the frogs are becoming malformed due to consistent exposure to a variant hormone environment during development, so it would be more accurate to say that the frogs are turning into trannies or hermaphrodites. Still sounds pretty familiar to what's going on with the epidemic of mental illness and hormone imbalance though, right?

Pretty much any sort of development of the past two hundred years is carcinogenic and/or fucks with your endocrine system. From plastics to artificial scents to GMO food to fertilizer, fluoride and poison in the water, the environment of a modern city will kill you, but of course even going off the grid means sharing contaminated water tables and polluted air.

This would mean that people who get acute taxoplasmosis become gay, which is not the case. A latent taxoplasmosis is simply a taxoplasmosis that hasn´t broken out yet.

Also how the fuck would virus that wants to infect cats make men taller and more handsome. I've seen this thread many times before and some anons are convinced but it fails to explain a lot. Like faggotism before cats were common pets or even common in areas. U

Actually this post way more succinctly spells out what I was trying to say, so basically "what this guy said".

I'd like to add though there's two other reasons this doesn't make sense, a virus that prevents it's host from reproducing seems counterproductive, and lesbians don't factor into this theory at all.

Pretty shit comparison. Aren't all (domestic) dogs the same sub-species? A german shepard, a doberman, a chihuahua and a corgi are all the same subspecies..

Guess what? They all look pretty fucking different too, compared to the examples there.

Race is more comparable to different breeds of dog.

Forgot to include it, the subspecies is called canis lupus familiaris. You'll find a lot more variety in the breeds of dogs in that subspecies than in races of humans.

A subspecies has very specific criteria, and the difference it actually makes, socially, whether we're the same subspecies or not only has the value that you attach to it, anyway. Seems like a pointless thing to get hung up over.

Take it from me, dark researcher, fags are depraved freaks only concerned with their next orgasm. We're broken. Don't fix us as we are beyond repair. Just focus on preventing faggots like me. Tribe.net is still fucking with me…

cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/
cdc.gov/hiv/risk/gender/msm/
Everyone who is not an exclusive heterosexual makes up about 2.1-2.7% of the population. With about 1% being homosexual. So the number of dudes that fuck dudes would be around 1.3% at most. So if they account for 56% of new infections they are 43 times more likely to be infected.

The total number of these dude-fuckers shall we call them who are infected each year is 28,200. Given that sexual activity occurs between 15 and 45 that means that in that time 846,000 of the sexually active dude fuckers will be infected. Their total population is about 4.095 million at the most. Of which 55% will be within that 15-45 age group. So about 2.25 million of them are sexually active in a given 30 year period of which 846,000 will be infected. So about 37.5% of their sexually active population will be infected in their lifetimes. Now before you say “but that is just niggers and spics”, look at the data, even when only accounting for whites the rate of infection is still 31%. Which is admittedly better than 37% but still not great.

Homosexual Men Have 50 Times Higher Rate of AIDS
cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm#incidence

One in Five Gay, Bisexual Men in U.S. Cities Has HIV
reuters.com/article/2010/09/23/us-aids-usa-idUSTRE68M3H220100923

Report Finds Black Gay Males in US Worst Hit By HIV-AIDS
ca.news.yahoo.com/report-finds-black-gay-males-us-worst-hit-161752246.html

STD Facts - Syphilis & MSM
cdc.gov/std/Syphilis/STDFact-MSM-Syphilis.htm

Viral Hepatitis Populations - Men Who Have Sex with Men
cdc.gov/hepatitis/Populations/msm.htm
“Didn't your study reveal that 40 percent of the homosexual men claimed to have had more than 500 partners?

Yes”

people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20072072,00.html

Becouse it's better to focus on improving society, child welfare (as little of government as possible) and promoting good parenting among adults.

Putting blame on and eradicating some minor parasite that may or may not cause the manifestation of bog creatures would just cause more harm down the way and the (((pharma industry))) would profit. Plus it's diversion and splitting of energy into potentially useless endeavors. It reminds me of the climate warming hoax and the CO2 boogeyman.

Interesting how you hear about bog creatures more and more while single parent households are at a record high and kids get educated by marxist propaganda in the media.
Why are there more bog creatures among the black population? Does it have to do with the fact that 3/4 of the males are too busy being in jail and letting their kids do crime and drugs even before puberty?

...

Even if it isn't Gondii, but a different pathogen, it could be a good model how such behaviour altering infection might work.

More complex organism show more complex behaviour, more strange side effects.

Sexual human rabies could be a description, no need to interfere complex intention into pathogens.

“Unnatural invention by man” is a oxymoron, as far as medicine, biology, science in general is concerned.

As far as external non pathogen stimuli is concerned, one doesn't exclude the other. Pathogenic and non-pathogenic source of homosexuality might coexist, would reenforce each other.

And

That isn't like it works in nature. A pathogen could change its host, attack a different host it is not adapted to. Evolution is not a solution minded process, it's trial and error.

Symptom of Toxoplasmosis is fucked up behavior.

Homosexuals show fucked up behavior, were homosexual intercourse is just one symptom.

Homosexuals are in their majority not even “homosexual” in the sense of an exclusive sexual attraction to the same sex. Homosexuals just show hypersexuality and the easiest partners are other homosexuals, this is particularly true for males. Males do have a urge to mate with as many partners as possible, “homosexual infection” might put that in overdrive.

Homosexuals were not primarily despised because of attraction to the same sex, but because they have strong tendencies to show bizarre, deviant and anti-social behavior.
Homosexuals claim all that unhealthy anti-social behavior is a result of social repression, but contemporary libertinage shows, their behavior just get even more pervert.

By manipulating their endocrinological system.

It doesn't prevents it's host from reproducing, babies are still born.

I remember reading thread exactly like this 2 years ago.

...

Fuck off, its not. Correlation between neurotic behavior and Toxoplasmosis have been proven in studies, but it isn´t generally connected to it, meaning most of the participants of the study have shown no symptoms at all. Physical symptoms are way more common. No study and no research could prove that Toxoplasmosis is causal for any changes of the psyche. There are many other diseases that are correlated with neurotic behavior, for example tumors. This could just as well mean, that people who have psychiatric diseases are more likely to get infected by Toxoplasmosis, since their organism and their immune system is weakened.
Educate yourself.

I guess its time for the annual "faggot acceptance thread" in which OP doesn´t participate one bit. Faggots are mentally ill, degenerate faggots, and the jews and their propaganda are to blame for them becoming more common, not cats or some other bullshit.

...

You're a fool if you think such mental illness has no connection to the physical environment which exists in the modern day. Susceptibility to such illness begins long before the traumas of abuse or cultural indoctrination. Miscegenation with the psychosis-prone kikes sets the bar at conception itself, and then the hormonal imbalances engendered by the environment and fractured psyche of the mother are passed onto the fetus. At birth, the child is brought into an artificial world built upon materials harmful even at the genetic level. There are now plenty of faggots who are truly born gay, because there is a system in place which strives to break humans from the very root of their physical existence. And that's without going into metaphysical aspects interfering with the process of incarnation as predicted in descriptions of the Dharma Ending Period or Kali Yuga. This cycle cannot be broken except by the eradication of all Semites and all Semitic ideologies.

Why are you tor posting…?

Dude, it doesn't matter how many asses you cum in, fags can't be impregnated.

HOLY FUCK

AND INFECTED WOMEN HOARD CATS SO PARASITE CAN REINFECT OTHERS

You deserve a nobel prize user

...

...

some meat for your feast
>Humans as Superorganisms: How
>Microbes, Viruses, Imprinted Genes,
>and Other Selfish Entities Shape Our
>Behavior
animistology.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Kramer-and-Bressan-Humans-as-Superorganisms.pdf

forgot the pubMed link
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177948

WHY DO YOU THINK ALL Holla Forums FAGS ARE GAY?

THEIR MASCOT IS A CAT!

Seriously though, if it was real all pagan homos in roman empire would had cats, not a real issue, homosexuality is an error of degenerate suicidal brain, they know it causes aids and death, and they still do it because the mind is reprogrammed to see women in men because of broken sexual desires, and sexual drive usually tops desire to live. And those sexual tendentions break because of wrong look on women in the first place, and wrongly put desires, especially in sexually abused kids.

Better idea: Don't own a cat.

ITT Holla Forums discovers biology

White people are protected from some of the effects of toxoplasmosis.

http:// genetics.thetech. org/ask/ask455
"Scientists aren't sure yet what the upside is of being Rh negative, but a recent idea is that it may protect from a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii. It doesn't keep you from getting the parasite, but it might make the effect less severe.

Toxoplasma gondii affects people's motor skills. For example, it seems to slow down people's responses so they are more likely to get in car accidents.

A couple of recent studies showed that having one copy of each Rh allele protects someone from these effects. In other words, people with one Rh positive copy and one Rh negative copy may do better in areas with lots of Toxoplasma gondii infections. Like in Europe, for example, where being Rh negative is much more common than other places in the world."

You're doing God's work user

Interesting, too bad you can't make scientific studies to test this hypothesis, it would be condemned as homophobic

I find it funny how people can say they are offended by something as if though that entitles them to anything except a mild "Oh."

I find it infinitely sad

The mind is physical, user.

This implies that there is another parasite transmitted in the same manner. If we can discover it, we can literally wipe out homosexuality, and maybe stop men from being cucks and women from being whores.

Come to think of it, this type of faggy bullshit seems to historically be associated with the rise of large empires that allow free travel. Greece, Rome, and now the modern world. Travel spreads disease. Back around 1900, there was hardly any faggotry to be found, now it seems like a good portion of the boys and male teens I see are feminine or flaming gay. I had previously attributed this to the spread of phytoestrogens, but perhaps this isn't the case.

Cats were commonly kept in Egypt, which both Greece and Rome conquered. Bug could have spread from there, even without cats.

Question: what is/was the incidence of homosexuality in isolated cultures like Iceland before their reintroduction to the wider world?

It's not any one thing or another, there are many chemical and societal factors that influence faggotry.

Liberal propaganda (poison pill), fags are about 1% of the population.
No it doesn't, homosexuality is caused by a different parasite, the Kike and its propaganda.
Your intention is to divert blame for corruption of the psyche away from the real cause (Jewish propaganda on media, and a Jewish social policies) and on to a parasite which infected large numbers of humans since cats were domesticated for protection of grain stores and rat control ,(bubonic plague protections) and has existed in humans long before fagdom ever became popular.
Are you TRS or Renegade (asinead)?
I'm guessing Renegade, your theory is batshit crazy enough to rank alongside the usual flat earth , giant stone trees and "nukes don't exist" shit which flows from those people and their affiliates (the Kike "weev".
Reversion of causality. Sexually desireable men are more likely to carry Toxo for the same reason as any other STD, they get more sex and have a higher chance of catching it.

No wonder mudslimes love cats, they do nothing but fuck little boys.

muds don't like any animals

Yes, they like cats. Go to fucking Istanbul, there's goddamn cats everywhere.

Just don’t own cats at all. Problem solved. They don’t obey you, they don’t care about you. They’re not dogs.

No, some dog breeds have a greater FST than other entire SPECIES of other parts of the Mammalia class.

A must watch, my newfags. Just try the first 60 seconds.

Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S." 3/11/69 by Frederick S. Jaffe (Vice-
president of Planned Parenthood - World Population)

toomanyaborted.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Jaffe-Memo.pdf

birthofanewearth.blogspot.ca/2016/07/examining-consequences-of-male.html?m=1

How much could it cost to run such a test? Im sure that we could find some scifags who would be willing to do the research, and im sure we could rent lab space. Im sure we could get college kids to participate in said study for $200 or less. And Im sure there are plenty of scholarly anons here that would write up a thesis to test for a plate of tendies. I bet ya Holla Forums could prove this theory for less than $50k. And I bet ya we would have no fucking problem getting the donations for such a study.

—-

>gather another sample, only faggots need apply, get them to participate for free this is for equality

—-

Hold on, I saw this posted in the exact same fucking format about 2 years ago on 4chan and it was debunked there.

Lame copy pasta

HEY THERE, COINTELPRO. HOW ARE YOU DOING?

(((Professors))) would figure out what you're doing and get the ethics board to shut you down. The only way you could possibly get away with this sort of research is at a staunchly Christian university like Liberty University, but that would seriously limit your ability to find faggot test subjects.

FUCK! the jews ruined fluffers

...

Whoops

Reported.

...

Bump.

Kill all faggots, by the way.

Ban this obvious sliding 4cuck shill

You don't even know what that means. Tell your boss to fire you Chaim, you're terrible at your job.

>It's not frivolous because _____
I will countersage until you stop shilling your retarded hypothesis.

Bump.

>>>/reddit/

...

...

...

...

Jaffe memo best post. fags

Bump because it triggers you, queer.

Very scientific.

Won't that mean that in the past there were a lot more gay people?
Since they didn't had no idea that little creatures like amoeba, viruses and bacteria existed.
Plus we all know that people hardly washed their hands in the past.
heck it's only recently that doctors started to wash their hands to reduce infections when they were operating.

No, because cat ownership was more uncommon in the past. It used to be associated with witches manhating lesbians.

beside those were black cats, not regular cats.
They were often used to catch rats and mice.
like at farms for example.
Beside rats and mice were everywhere.

People didn't live in close contact with their barn cats. They weren't snuggling with cats like people do today.

perhaps in the middle ages
but in egypt and ancient roman they were constantly in contact. graves were made for cats in rome at 1 A.D.

Egyptians and Romans were also known for their sexual degeneracy.

beside regardless they snuggled and huggled the cats, their shit was all over the place.
clinging on plants like grain which humans ate.

Cats bury their shit…….

True they do outside and mostly always near the same location, but you think those amoeba would sit still? Heck cats could have shit anywhere like in hay and fresh cut crops.
Shit everywhere mate. and not speak about the pee.

OBLIGATORY VIEW

Time to fast and only eat vegetables and meat directly from a farmer.

...

Don't forget, it's not only that: Plastics release Xenoestrogen, and correlate with multiplying problems we have today.
But these problems existed since the dawn of Written History, primarily due to the Agricultural Revolution, which introduced Phytoestrogens in our diets trough Grains.
Grains, and everything derived from it are huge evils as well.

Interestingly enough, the USA researched using homosexuality… as a weapon. A "gay bomb" (anyone back in halfchan /n/ remember the threads?) if you will. Look it up, I'm not kidding.

We still need to find out why homo rates are the highest it has ever been, why modern males are so effeminate, and what is causing test levels to drop like nothing ever seen in history before. Modern men have a fraction of the test past generations of men did.

PHYTOESTROGEN STUDIES

The pros and cons of phytoestrogens
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3074428/

Effects of phytoestrogen on sexual development
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433562/

AVOID FOOD DERIVED FROM GRAINS, SUCH AS MILLET, CORN, BARLEY, OATS, RICE, RYE, WHEAT AND MANY MORE
STOP EATING BREAD, STOP DRINKING BEER, STOP USING SOY SAUCE OR ANYTHING SOY AT ALL - POPCORN IS FORBIDDEN
VEGETABLE OILS ARE BAD, USE PORK'S FAT, OLIVE OIL OR BUTTER TO FRY

If it's a fetus already it's either male or female, a parasite won't change chromosomes u dumb nigger.

Good advice. Definitely avoid soy and hoppy beers.
However, most of the phytoestrogens in grains and oils come from glycophosphates like Round Up. Organic grains and oils are fine.

MUH FAD DIET
Do you know how much you'd have to eat of that stuff for a measurable negative effect? Definitely avoid it if you can, but worrying about it is silly. Especially because I'd wager you and nobody here actually adheres to that.

Vegetable oils are at most part not oil from vegetable but industrial waste. Saturated fat like Olive oil, butter, coconut oil is the fat you want.

>sci-hub.cc/10.1177/1745691615583131

==Humans as Superorganisms: How
Microbes, Viruses, Imprinted Genes,
and Other Selfish Entities Shape Our
Behavior==

I've cut out grains/beer and went from 215 to 185 lbs in 2 months. I ate oats twice in that time. It's not the phytoestrogens alone obviously since it's the lack of carbs that overall, but it's probably worth worrying about if you aren't already in good condition.

Anybody ever read A Wanting Seed by Anthony Burgess the author of A Clockwork Orange ? Has to do with a homosexual by design dominated world.

I'm sorry. I feel for you, I really do. Thank you for siding with us, rather than becoming a mindless lefty worker-drone.

As you wish.

then your point is irrelevant

Studies show that it's a very close balance of T and E that produces the most fags. Overabundance of T leads to more fags than E, thus you get Wolfman.

And what causes the behaviour in dolphins?

...

Homosexuality has been widespread throughout all of recorded history.

This might come as a surprise to you, but homosexuality even occurs in animals.

There is a matter of social inheritance as well. That might not be the right term for it, but follow me here: Children who were raped typically grow up to be pedophiles or rapists. Children of wifebeaters grow up to be wifebeaters. Gays that were brought into "the gay community" at a young age by older men typically end up repeating that behavior and luring in younger men later in their life. Children preyed on by priests and pedophilic male authority figures (scout leaders, coaches, etc) end up being massive faggots like Milo.

Abuse begets abuse, is the general idea. Combine that with the fact that the media and government has been so eager to prey on younger children and inflict identity politics upon them. They keep pushing this earlier and earlier by trying to dissolve the concept of gender identity, usually in the name of saving trans and gay kids from the trauma of being "confused" or feeling "oppressed"

A quick aside: It feels like there's an attempt to drive down birthrates of whites and American citizens through a series of agendas like this. Increase the cost of living so no one smart will decide to have children. Encourage more women in the world place and get them riled up about an imaginary wage gap so they work more and procreate less. Celebrate abortions as a "woman's right". Any kids that are born get pumped so full of xenoestrogens and hipster faggot identity politics that they grow up into simpering numale quasi-faggots who would never dare to inflict their penis upon a woman.. And suddenly, we need immigrants to keep our population up.. Specifically, the poor, stupid, savage middle-easterners and North Africans who demand as much free shit as they can get. There's no such thing as coincidences here.

There's also the "confused" period many teenagers go through during puberty. The common wisdom used to be that such things were just a phase, and they were right. It's a time in a human being's maturation cycle where their body and brain chemistry go fucking insane. Of course, it stands to reason that this might result in some unusual or illogical behavior. The solution used to be to gently guide a confused teen away from such unnatural behavior, because eventually the right instincts would kick in… Yet again, the media and the government, specifically college academia, really, really enforces the notion of the "rebellious period" where teenagers are not only expected to act out against their parents, but to embrace every single stupid decision and idea they have.

Furthermore, they are encouraged to engage in identity politics activism which not only attaches shame to the concept of heteronormativity, but destroys the self-esteem of some young men, turning to depression and self-loathing, making them easy to build back up as a "polyamorous genderqueer pansexual" or some such shit.

In cases that can't be explained by T. Gondii or early childhood sexual abuse, I think you'll likely find a trail of breadcrumbs in the form of broad, nigh-undetectable social conditioning.

This is why I shoot cats that enter my property. Fuck off with that native bird killing, toxoplasmosis shit. They also piss on my convertible roof.

Too bad the average lonely deadshit here has 2 cats. One of highest ownership rates in the world and they wonder why we have issue with native wildlife. ignorant fuckers. I'm killing your cats. Fuck off.

Yup, 'crazy cat lady' usually single/solo mum at most. They fucking magnet up cats because they want more kids and can't afford them here because we don't have 'nigger cut and paste' welfare like you. they only get gibs till age of 6 or so.

Or, how an infections behavior might work. Supposedly obesity can be effectively modeled in this way, i.e., obesity "is" infectious (in that its behavior is well-explained by an infection model).

Remember the plague? Vector was fleas on rats. It would be interesting, no doubt, if homosex were transmissible by a pathogen.

But, it is also interesting to consider its potential as a viral meme that is "helped along" by (((mass media))) and the other usual players. The mind determines our actions, and every one of us here understands that minds are just habitats for memes and can easily be infected (influence = influenza).

If an infection model explains the spread of poopdickery, then the next logical step is developing a hygiene protocol to (a) protect against it, and (b) treat it. If the root problem is biochemical, then we can use conventional science or therapies. If it is memetic, then a "fecal transplant of the mind" could be needed to restore a thriving memetic culture into the mind and eliminate the pathogenic poopdick meme.

(For completeness: Environmental pollution, epigenetics, fetal/child development, abuse or experiences in formative years, and "dud" genetic probability may be culprits too.)

politely saged.

You'll also notice that cats are the preferred animal in the lgbtwtfbbqwerty community, and that kike media is pushing them as the "superior" alternative to dogs.

Homosexuals and Psychopaths are the same group of people.

...

ONCE EVERY 2 MONTHS, LIKE FUCKING CLOCKWORK, SOME D&C SHILL PULLS THIS ANTI-PET SHIT TO GET US TO KILL OUR PETS OR TURN US AGAINST EACH OTHER SO THEY CAN FINALLY PORTRAY THE RIGHT AS THE EBBIL NAZIS THE LEFT BELIEVES THEM TO BE. I HOPE YOU ALL DON'T FALL FOR THIS.

I guess you mean "newfags". There is a slight difference there…

nobody said anything about eliminating dogs or any other pet.

No, just no.

SIEG HEIL

This is correct, but you're going to get a lot of people on Holla Forums who insist that this is nothing more than "prison gay" behaviour from animals with no access to the opposite sex. Of course, animals DO display "prison gay" homosexual behaviour when the opposite sex isn't available…but a few species (sheep most notably) ALSO have members that are preferentially homosexual. Theories of the etiology of homosexuality need to either take that into account…or explain how homosexuality in humans is completely different.

Essentially every theory is garbage, for one reason or another:

Twin studies disprove it's strongly genetic. At best, genes might be involved in a susceptibility to developing homosexuality. (Kinda like schizophrenia.)

The rate of childhood abuse amongst gays is nowhere NEAR high enough. Not to mention here people assuming the direction of causation: studies on child molesters have shown that they tend to specifically target socially ostracized children. Being GNC ("gender non-conforming") in childhood has a strong association with adult homosexuality, and queers who report having been GNC children are the most likely to also report having been molested. It may be more that being an obviously gay kid (and rejected by other kids for it) is a risk factor for molestation…and not that molestation causes homosexuality.

Also, this:

…is incorrect, most victims do NOT become pedophiles.

Same problems as above: the "absent father" dynamic isn't common ENOUGH to come close to being an explanation. And again, proposing it does could be confusing the direction of causation. That's especially true of shit like family dynamics where research is highly vulnerable to bias and misinterpretation.

This one is really interesting. Greg Cochran has argued before that the fitness cost of homosexuality is way too high for it to be genetic, and that it's probably caused by a pathogen that passed from sheep to people with the rise of agriculture. But he's suggested it's a pathogen we haven't even DISCOVERED yet. So he's got nothing much.

Re: t. gondii, people have already pointed out some holes (e.g. owning cats has a poor correlation with actual rates of homosexuality), and some of the "evidence" anons are coming up with is a serious stretch, e.g.

…which is basically a meme fetish, doesn't really exist much outside of the internet:

guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/aeap.2006.18.6.490

Even amongst guys who call themselves "bugchasers" online, only 7.5% of the sample these researchers looked at were even serious enough about it to deliberately seek HIV+ partners. For most people, it's a super-risky masochist fantasy. Kind of like the guy who jacks off to sending a dominatrix all his banking information because he gets off to the idea that she could steal all his money and ruin him. Most guys aren't dumb enough to really do this.

Rare in general.

Ages ago, I was trying to find studies on the actual prevalence of homosexuals who have anal sex. I found one study that said 80%+ currently claim to have it, but that was up from single-digit percentages from several decades ago. Of course, some of the men in the earlier studies may have been lying, but the gap was still enormous, it was like a 10x increase.

Also, heterosexuals engaging in anal sex is now up to 36% (for women) and 44% (for men), up from practically zero.

I blame pornography.

Anyway, the last theory I can think of is:
Which seems to have a fair amount of evidence behind it. But basically all the specifics are unknown: WHY would there be a hormonal imbalance in the first place, what causes it, etc.

If the prevalence of homosexuality was ACTUALLY rising, that might be a clue. But…though Holla Forums acts like it is, it's not. Homosexuals have been single-digit percentages of the population since researchers started trying to track sexual preferences.

Additionally, most theories of etiology only apply to MALE homosexuality and not FEMALE homosexuality (which may be caused by something different anyway).

Bottom line, the cause of homosexuality is still a mystery. Whatever your pet theory is, it's just that. It might as well be voodoo.

I think it has more to do with the Uterus thing. Specially with Mother's testosterone and oestrogen levels (phytoestrogens and xenoestrogens playing a vital role in disrupting hormonal balances).

Differences between Male and Female would be explained by too little Testosterone in Males, causing the malformation of Sertoli Cells (this explains why gay men doesn't have problems with testosterone production, but they could have with absorption) and Females with too much Testosterone (and Oestrogens too) as Fat Women have more than healthy ones.

Really, I can't elaborate it well, but I think it is there: a problem with the Mother hormones and fetal development in uterus.