Note that this isn't problem with Communism, this is problem for Communism. I'm asking how, in your opinion, a Communist society would deal with the following scenario.
Do you allow Boris to perpetuate this sort of activity? Do you force him to distribute his wine equally? Cease wine-making? Execute or otherwise punish him? Seize his wine?
What would happen if Boris quit working and just made wine full time, bartering for what he needed to live with his wine? Would you accept this?
you already fucked up
full retard mode
If we're talking Communism then we're at the theoretical stage where society is able to produce all the wine it needs anyway, so Boris's wine has no intrinsic value fit for trading.
But if you want to assume that we're at some lower stage of socialism where these things are limited, how is Boris able to produce such an excess of wine with only his own saved rations of grapes, yeast, etc?
I don't understand why you think this is a problem.
We are talking about what would be considered an excess for one person who has to be sober enough to go and work an eight hour day and doesn't want to be drunk at all times not at work.
It's at minimum a grey market economy that may grow into an alternative to the approved system.
i would say the most logical thing to do would be to force boris to have SRS like they do in iran when they find a queer. the punishment will be so absurd and uncalled for that no one will ever dare try it again.
...
can we all please just stop replying to femposters
wine is so plentiful that nobody want's boris's wine.
boris is not hiring anybody for a wage and exploiting their labor, so it's fine.
boris gets 12 months gulag because markets are evil.
Alright, and? So what? Even if he's trading it, what's he going to trade it for under Communism?
It's at minimum growing tomatoes which would be completely superfluous in whatever a Communist economy would look like.