I mean If its the best looking system on paper then why would the various other systems that look awfully on paper like capitalism work better?
Surely a system which encourages immense inequality would only exacerbate the problems brought about by human nature
Lucas Jenkins
Ultimately this would be a flaw with all societies if it were true. The only way a society can function is if at least a certain threshold of people aren't actively trying to destroy it. This is true of capitalism as well.
Luis Long
humans are evil which is why we need a fully automated voluntary state taking care of all our decisions
Camden Lewis
Humans do what they are conditioned to do, what that conditioning is varies immensely. Whether that conditioning is a product of their environment, social relations, or what ever. Most individuals today, who abhor the way Nazi Germany demonized and slaughtered numerous groups of people so many years ago, would probably support it if they were in the same boots as the German civilians of that time. Likewise, the opposite is true, were the same Germans who supported the Reich modern folks, they would, by and large, think quite negatively of that bit of history.
Some people do seem to be born with a stronger sense of self than others, those who are willing to break the mold despite being raised in a common environment. And innumerable little decisions and coincidences too, will influence one's outlook on life.
Christian Wright
How can innately evil beings produce innately good concepts?
Adam Nguyen
You haven't even defined your good and evil, essentialist style nor consequence style (was the act considered "socially evil", etc.), so there's nothing to argue for or against, but beyond that: if human being critters aren't innately good, why do you think they are automatically innately evil?
Either you're trolling, or you're stuck in a bubble in your head.
Owen Flores
Not OP, I don't think they're innately evil unless they're predefined as such.