European Architecture Genocide?

Holla Forums

This is a broken and unsubstantiated theory of mine, but I think it's worth considering.

Why is it that after WWII, no great European-style architecture was built ever again, in the United States, or Europe? The beautiful styles of gothic churches, grand Roman columns, Victorian mansions, or any building style with attention to detail, with chiseled artwork adorning the marble, stone, or wood making up the structure?

For fuck's sake, Pennsylvania Station in New York City turned from a grandeous port for creativity, to a shithole. A hole full of shit, inefficient, dirty, and dark.

Was this merely an unfortunate end to architecture that goes beyond purpose, or was it one of (((their))) schemes to undermine and dismantle the greatness of the white race?

Open to additions, thoughts, and criticism.

Pic related, the "Save our Heritage" sign really struck an eerie feeling with me that others felt the way I do at the time.

Other urls found in this thread:

thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/01/how-jews-created-american-modernism.html
you
dailystormer.com/france-is-demolishing-thousands-of-churches-building-mosques/
architectureau.com/articles/brutalist-style-school-of-molecular-bioscience-at-usyd-gains-heritage-listing/
culturewars.com/Reviews/LivingMachinesReviews.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurist_architecture
my.mixtape.moe/ipljph.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Classical_architecture
talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/border-wall-prototypes-aesthetics
archive.is/FtRqZ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinist_architecture
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Brutalism was the forced cultural rape of Europeans by kikes and their collaborators.

Construction of "modern" architecture is promoted and financed by Jews. Anything built after 1956 should be torn down.

Because after WWII the Jews took mostly control and they HATE beauty in everything. Why? Because beauty inspires the human being, it anoints the soul itself and creates a desire in people to search for a meaning and to create beauty themselves, not only in form of paintings or buildings, but in their very actions as people. That's what the Jews want to prevent, since it helps people not only to gain strength but also to maintain it. They can't rule over the goyim if those are strong with fire in their heart. That's why degeneration of society and the glorification of repulsive filth is being overall pushed. The Jew want to kill beauty and purity, because he is the embodiment of ugliness and corruption.

I never understood what's the deal with modern architecture. Surely with our superior tech we should be capable of improving the looks and efficiency of buildings, but instead we get generic building #234893, which looks exactly like generic building #234892. And what's more: both look like shit. I don't mean everything should look like a palace, but take any office building in the world and it's impossible to tell where it's from because they all have the exact same boring look.

The only acceptable office buildings IMO are the art deco ones like Chrysler Building.

God, all that needs to happen is to see that they're removed from positions of power, by way of mass redpilling, but how do we do that with the Jews in our way?

They've cornered us with words. We fight back with death. Kill George Soros, Iger, all of them. Watch them scramble, and then educate the world on the Jewish problem.

Somehow, we'll secure a future for our white children. It starts with dethroning the Jew.

Utilitarianism is a major reason why. Beautiful, intricate structures serve no utility so you end up with box buildings because what is necessary are four walls and a ceiling, so that's what you get. It's one of the reasons I can't live in major cities with buildings on every corner: it all has the stench of death upon it. This fixation on utility is another example of baseness in modern culture (along with the muh dick mentality and so on, especially when concerned with art: increasingly we see people only interested in art that is pornographic or near to that because it serves the purpose of pleasing one's cock and base, hedonistic desires, and so expression and higher ideals are being killed everywhere, not just in architecture but the entire creative, artistic world).

Futurism and Neo-Futurism is the Aryan Man's Architecture.

Holy shit the MSM doesn't even know what they're revealing!

thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/01/how-jews-created-american-modernism.html

Exactly. Everything being pushed by them and generally accepted by most others is an attempt to rid us of these things, so romanticism and chastity were some of the first things to be attacked yet they are quintessentially Aryan qualities.

They really are the root of every problem.

This could be a narrative though. Graphics comparing modern Jewish utilitarian architecture to pre-1940s European architecture, "How did we get here?"

Jewish 'art' tends towards being a projection of their sheer external and internal ugliness.

They must pay for their crimes against humanity and everything good in this world. They must pay.

I'm becoming an architect to try and bring this beauty back. The post war market was flooded with brutalism, which is garbage. And now we have the modern wave of architecture. Both are garbage.

Can't build those kinds of buildings with Mexican labor though.

Take a look at this crap OP

Grand designs UK still features some pretty neat stuff though.
>tfw no restored ages old stone mill on a hill in the woods

>tfw no restored old English tavern in the woods adjacent to a hiking path that's part homestead part tavern

Studying towards something similar myself, glad to hear there will be goof architectures out there.
I hope I too can influence the thoughts towards actual nice architecture.

Mussolinis Headquarters is my favorite building coupled with the Wawel Cathedral. Fascist knew aesthetic, even in modernism.

I agree. Although I have to admit, it can be.. fascinating at times. They are a very damaged race.

Exclusion from our paradise shall be their penance, and by excision I am of course referring to a brutal backlash against all ugly and immoral.

The HQ building itself is quite nice but I never understood the "SI SI SI SI SI SI" thing. To me it just looks like the modern style I'm against.

...

A lot of architecture was built by Freemasons (the actual builders, not the larping boys club) and encoded with Pythagorean ratios and all that stuff. Maybe the old buildings were destroyed and not rebuilt to conceal those secrets.

Der juden never were that bright.

Trellick Tower, London. This building gives me nightmares. Partially because they actually went ahead and made it a Grade II listed so it can never be knocked down.

Architect: Ernő Goldfinger.

Without doubt architectural (merely one element of the effort to psychologically destroy us) warfare has been waged upon Europe, it is a pretty widely held theory. Even Prince Charles holds it.

The following is relevant and touches on the topic directly:

you tube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc

It's like a prison and a tenement had a baby. Look it's even got a watchtower with tiny little bridges leading to the main cellblock to control prisoner movement

Quite! Just awful isn’t it!

Frustratingly it is now considered desirable and what with London being an “international city” a side effect of which being that it is open to dirty money from any nation on earth (much of which get’s invested or rather hidden in London property) a flat in this monstrosity can cost you the best part of a million pounds. London is a sick sick place.

This is what a lot of housing in the University of California school system looks like. Really makes you think…

(heil´d)
Exclusion from our paradise shall be their penance

Mate, I fucking hate that piece of shit, glad it's on that side of the river.
we will see

They are promoting the death of European/Western culture and are importing in shit skins as well as promoting race mixing and pushing the idea that white people shouldn't have children because "sustainability". Wait until the architecture catches up a bit more architecture will resemble the slums in Brazil.

The 3D printed cuckholes they're going to push will look a lot neater and stack a whole lot higher.

initially…. the darker the inhabitants the worse it will be for the structures ( they destroy everything). Worse if you consider the leftists want people to live like rats on top of each other in closets.

I guess vols just don't care today.

that video fills me with a strange, dull feeling
a mixture of disgust, depression and extreme anger

Yes I understand that but beyond that, which in itsself demonstrates discipline and ultimate commitment unto the cause, there were none brutalist, big, intrusive human cages made out of concrete littered all around. It has a right amount of "modernity" coupled with classical aesthetic with a touch of sharpness as to be both very aesthetically pleasing and non-stagnant. If that doesn't make you feel powerful, orderly, and committed, what does then?

They know what they're doing. They gloat whenever they think they can get away with it. You think if Jews are all sitting together and one of them mentions that Jews run Hollywood they'll accuse that Jew of anti-semetism ? No, they'll laugh about it and celebrate their accomplishment.

tbh when I was in Rome the fascist architecture didn't do all that much for me. Not bad, but just something about it was "Off" for lack of a better word. Doesnt't work in the same way classical stuff does.

I feel the same way to a certain extent, but that one in particular is my favorite. I still hold my point about the absence of commie cages though. Lastly, my question wasn't rethorical, let's see what makes you feel powerful user. Don't wanna shill my country's architecture too hard.

...

...

Skip to 1:50 for the action.

Imagine the beautiful moving parts behind it. Built to last for sure

Another favorite. Truly unrivaled. Start posting anons

It really is awe inspiring, I was also as much impressed to approach St.Marys altar to inspect further only to see it open and reveal a beautiful glided moment frozen in time, accompanied by organs that didn't sound like ass.

Please, someone shop a merchant behind this building with a "who could be behind this architecture" caption.

Here you go.

boy there's a lot on here that's pissing me off today. the wholesale destruction of civilization can't be permitted.

(Checked)

Confirmed. Civilization must endure.

Liberation of Israel by NatSoc forces when?

Same reason people don't spend too much money for dog houses.

ban me

Not happening. I'll take your namefaggotry out though. Good grief, man.

Antichristians never change…

This is a birds eye view of the French VA military hospital.

I wish trump had the government build such an opulent facility for Veterans.

Eclectic crap like this is what I hate, along with brutalism.

However I do like modest, simple scandinavian houses.

Fuck. Ever since i was little i ALWAYS would wonder why dont they ever build anything beautiful anymore? Why is everything beautiful over 80 yrs old? Why does everything they build these days have to be so god damn ugly??

That jews and modernism article was very funny. Its like they dont realize the implications of their writing

In Finland, by the bastard Alvar Aalto.

And thread is locked. Fuck off you faggoty ass mods.

What the fuck, OP is completely right and this is Holla Forums as fuck. God damned kike mods

Mods are fags.

Fags the mods are.

Nice! Saved.
Report the thread til they unlock it, works sometimes.

bump

Thread isn't bump-locked anymore.

Bump.

Could at least post something outside of that hipster shithole.

Keep forgetting the link to the moderation log, but a big thanks to the mod who unlocked the thread!
I'm sad you banned me for the duplicate thread though, i was trying to get your attention, and it wasn't a dupe tbh.

Here's a nice example, pic related is a planned building inspired by the older architecture in the city. For some reason this launched a huge debate and many oppose it. Still being built so fuck them.

The architect wants people to consider some of the points made ITT.

This building even has plans for interior decoration IIRC

You always hear about how old architecture styles were so expensive, but would they really be that much more unaffordable today?

Save our brutalist heritage before Charles becomes king and declares UK-disney.

Now even bigger and better.

brutalism is soul destroying bullshit

What do you guys think of Trump's taste in Architecture?

Do you think that if Trump consolidates power that we can fucking fix this? Maybe we'll get nice buildings in the infrastructure bill.

Where is it being constructed?

Växjö, Sweden believe it or not

Older architectural styles weren't more expensive to design or build in their respective time frames because we had healthy economies back then which catered for aesthetic constructions. Even the most impoverished Balkan backwater cities had beautiful architecture and they were obviously not industrial superpowers in any respect, yet they could still afford it.

But no go- I mean guy, the price of living in aesthetic environments is too high we're going to have to build you these cheap slave pens instead hope you enjoy living next to your new neighbors Jamal and Pajeet.

Ah. No wonder it's being met with opposition.


Quoting for relevancy and why mods shouldn't bumplock such a thread. Thanks for restraining your faggotry urges for now.

When the Mohammedans rebel and they will they'll start demolishing architecture in the major cities they control. There's several reasons for this but mainly that it's tactically expedient to force us to storm the cities block by block and take them back at high cost to our side.

We have four options:
1) Assault the cities with combined forces, mostly ground units at high cost of life and moderate collateral damage to architecture and monuments.
2) Besiege cities and starve them out which gives the rebels ample time to demolish architecture
3) Besiege cities and conduct aerial and arterial bombardment operations which will force faster capitulation but we'll destroy our own monuments and architecture. They will also base their operations inside important landmarks to force us to make the decision to destroy it.
4) Besiege the cities and drop chemical ordnance. This is the best option most of our architecture will survive depending on how quick we are.

We don't actually have chemical weapons. And that's a problem. They're illegal by international law. And they take time to manufacture. If we're lucky we'll have control of government and have had the foresight to manufacture them.

There's a high likelihood that this could go very badly and we end up losing most of our precious architecture and monuments in major cities. Mohammedans are also well known for their tendency to target architecture and monuments. It may be strategically expedient for us to let them destroy our most precious national architecture in order to galvanise our people against them.

REALLY? Not… comeback when you've fixed your shit and can articulate it like something other than a nigger?


It's not obvious to you? Yeah how could it be, you just live there.

It's BECAUSE!!! it was never meant to last.

...

It still is. Take a trip to a neighborhood where the median home price is seven (or preferably eight) digits and you'll see all of that on display.

None of those were made in any proximity to WWII and the reason there are less of them around now isn't just because they aren't popular any more but because of attrition (aided until the 1970s by the federal government, plus we never had any Romans) in the case of the US and being razed by warfare and/or commies in yurop.

Both. The writing was on the wall for craftsmanship as soon as industrialization came into bloom in the late 19th century and while modernism is an understandable progression from that spiritual, social and economic trend leftists flocked to it like flies to shit because of its disruptive potential and have been running the show ever since.

I have folders of pictures at home related to this thread, will post after work.

Stuff like before and after of beautiful traditional buildings being torn down for modernist garbage by jews and leftists.

As well as recently built beatiful & traditional buildings at equal or less than the average commiesquares in price.

Much of it can be found at the mmxxii architecture facebook thread.

Here's a few higher res images from the U.S. around the turn of the century.

...

...

You know a lot of that is still around in my area.

Thank god I live in a neighborhoood with a fuckton of diverse and nice architecture.

If I recall correctly, from seeing a lot of buildings all over Europe of them decaying and pieces falling off or being repaired, those "expensive" buildings are actually made with massive stones. Many of them were actually regular bricks with a plaster/concrete covering the bricks that was poured into a type of mesh framework.

Can any Eurofags confirm or deny this building technique for your 18th - early 20th century buildings? Or am I talking out of my ass?

Were not* made with massive stones.

Fucked up.

Bump for quality.

They're few and far between for me in the U.S. South.

While there are some exceptions (cotton/oil/cattle barons constructed a few nice buildings up into the 20's) it seems the South was just too broken after the Civil War to worry itself with grand structures. It didn't really take off again until after WWII. And then with the post-war boom they jumped straight into modernist crap while neglecting or demolishing historic structures.

Pic 3 with the toy store really pisses me off. That's basically the entirety of U.S. suburban commercial sprawl. That image could be any corner in 10,000 different U.S. suburbs.

Whites enjoying a day of peaceful commerce, pre-enrichment. Detroit, circa 1910.

brah we can just rebuild afterwards, even better this time around

God I hate the Jews so much. They really want to destroy all beauty in the world and replace it with abominations. I'd never heard of this station being destroyed but there are many examples of beautiful buildings like this being destroyed post WW2 by these Jewish vandals.

There hasn't been a single good architecture movement in around a hundred years.

You do not understand how controversial the demolition of Penn Station was at the time.
There were day-and-night protests. It caused nation-wide outraged, it was a tourist attraction.
New York had to create the Landmarks Preservation Commission to ensure something like it never happened again.

the churches on each side look new age af. they look like temples to the antichrist.

https:// vimeo.com/ 103665136

Required viewing for every Holla Forumsack I'd say. Also very relevant to the thread.

That last thing looks like a venereal disease on an urban scale. Truly horrific.

I think the OP is right, this is has been a cultural genocide. Some people might have tried to stop it, but it was not enough. The worst thing is, there are far fewer people left who even consciously appreciate good architecture or even notice anything at all.

The fourth pic I posted, a Gehry designed Jewish monstrosity, is around the corner from where I study. People always comment how it is 'interesting', they all use this word, like they do to describe all modern filth. They don't even have an actual opinion on whether they like it, it is just 'interesting'. I call it ugly and they think that is a weird opinion. I think there are certain objective standards to beauty and everything built after about the 1950's has been in direct contradiction to these principles. I can't wait until we win and we tear down all their monuments to their false God of equality and the degradation of humanity. We can rebuild everything that was lost and even better.

i feel your pain syd brah. you at uts?

Do you really have to ask?

It's really simple. Ornamentation, classical trim and all that goodness costs money.
Why pay for that when you can trick people into thinking ""modernist"" architecture looks good.

Fun Fact, in Germany houses were intentionally "entstucked" (= have ornaments and trim removed) because muh nazis.
de(.)wikipedia(.)org/wiki/Entstuckung

No, I'm at this TAFE building. It's far too ornate for the place, they will probably demolish it soon and replace it with a featureless box to match the surrounds.

I'm studying graphic design I know… and the teachers made us watch a video all about how fantastic the bauhaus movement was and how those ebul nazis opposed it, in the same video they talk about victorian ironwork and ornamentation calling it unnecessary, excessive and an example of class exploitation (the rich exploiting the poor to make expensive door handles, gates etc etc)

It made me want to take a smoke break and I don't even smoke.

Just described my tafe m8

well considering tafe has been losing money cause the local govt doesnt give a shit, it's prime property to be sold off, demolished and replaced by student accom for chinks.

Do you know Gehry had the fucking audacity to call most architecture shit?

I don't know too much about it, but my teachers and many people think they are destroying TAFE on purpose. Perhaps for many reasons, one being able to sell off all the property belonging to TAFE. It's ridiculous, it used to be a practical based college for working class people to get ahead. Now they charge out the ass for a dysfunctional experience. The amount of trouble I've had just dealing with with their inept administration system and their shitty computer system which they recently paid nearly 1 BILLION dollars for from some poo in loo company. They're all a bunch of crooks, this country is corrupt at every level. The education system is a joke. No one learns anything anymore, except how evil white people are. All the Asians just cheat their way to degrees. It's so bad guys, it really is.

the only reason why people go to higher education in aus is because you can't get a job without some sort of degree or diploma. You could be the most qualified person in the world but you gotta have a bit of paper to get an entry position

The irony is that those "excessive" things are actually the furthest thing you can come from ""class exploitation"".

A friend of mine makes really high-quality cabinets for private jets, yachts or mansions.

It's all hand made, so it takes time, effort and skill - and it's expensive.

Most people who can afford these things don't bat an eye at the cost of handmade cabinets.

He makes very good money, because it's not a business where you count nickels at the end.

The only times he has a problem with his work is when he runs into one of (((them))).

They also want mahagony cabinets with custom engraved brass handles and what not. But they want to pay IKEA prices for that.

Yeah it's true in many cases, but that's more of a reflection on the deterioration of the education system. It's like they don't want people in the professional world who haven't undertaken a minimum of three extra years of even more intensive Marxist brainwashing.

There are still many things that education is valuable for. At least 3/4 of the people doing higher education currently shouldn't even be there and are a huge waste of time and resources.

Didn't Kubrick use this building as the reprogramming facility in A Clockwork Orange?

That includes me but my body is too monged up to join the reserves/army


yeah of course, it was just commie bullshit shitting on anyone spending time to make something beautiful rather than "simple"

The simple guy down the road who wasn't capable of being a writer or anything like that but could make beautiful ironwork by spending hours of his life to hone his craft deserves a place in our world, not to get sent to the back of the welfare line while simple shit that breaks within a year gets outsources to malaysia or india.

It's so much worse than you think.

Link related:
dailystormer.com/france-is-demolishing-thousands-of-churches-building-mosques/

what is worse: getting a box like that built or brutalist architecture being heritage listed?
architectureau.com/articles/brutalist-style-school-of-molecular-bioscience-at-usyd-gains-heritage-listing/

so that cancer on this earth has to stay forever now huh?
we'll see

While in reality it was the reverse.

Bauhaus claimed to work to uplift the common people, had in the end a communist at the helm (that was sealing their fate). The things the Bauhaus produced were expensive villas and furniture, only few very rich people could afford. A lot of the stuff they designed was not very practical or well designed in its functional aspect, something the affluent could tolerate for aesthetic reasons. It looked “industrial” and “modern”, but was artisan style stuff, difficult and expensive to made. Ordinary people without an abundance in space and money could not afford such a waste.
Bauhaus was an art movement for the “limousine socialists”, pretending to be “working class”, like Marie-Antoinette pretending to be a shepherdess.

For real prewar “working class” design check Frankfurter Küche, Frankfurt kitchen or Marx Höfe in Vienna (Commie blocks done right).

That said, the furniture Hitler had in his places left a lot to be desire, were not elegant at all and plump.


So bad and tacky it's nearly good again. Looks very much like the “Arab Gulf style”.

He isn't the worst of the contemporary architects, like Foster.

I had a friend who gradually grew to like twisted, perverse art and formless bland architecture. The latter in particular he saw as a sort of joke against the "other" people who didn't know better, people who were stupid or all-too-quick to listen to an "experts" opinion even if it's demonstrably bullshit. We would often draw things together, he perfecting or evolving his twisted and cruel imagery, and I trying to imitate classical forms - I was objectively terrible of course, but for a teenager not so bad. I always felt that I was the one missing something, assuming that he saw more in those Jewish images than I did by some sort of deeper perception.

Then a few years later found out he was a Jew himself. It's strange to think back and know a Jews thoughts very intimately, without either of us having known his racial origin at the time. That for me is strong evidence for the innate, intractable difference between aryans and semites.

what do you guys of the pope audience hall?
it gives me the creeps

just reminds me of your typical televangelist bullshit room designed to siphon money and turn people into even gooder goys. It looks so impersonal too, it shouldn't be like a lecture hall with individual seats and the like, it should look like, gee I dont know, a church?

ligitimatly looks like a hellscape inside
its not like the church doesnt know how to order buildings to talk to crowds, they've been doing it for millenia.

read my thoughts exactly

Nice, death to the jewish tryanny on creativity!

Not a single cross in sight. What the fuck.
The Catholic Church is truly the whore of babylon.

I guess vomit isn't worse than shit either, but still wouldn't touch either.

have you seen the sculptures at the back?

The infuriating thing is that industrial process and manufacturing methods don't have to result in the soulless concrete blockhouses of which mid-20th century architects were so enamoured. St Pancreas Station in London, for example, is brick and decorative stone over a steel frame, essentially the same structural forms as a Victorian warehouse or office block or prison. That building alone is proof absolute that the material matters, but the execution of design and construction matters more.
Brick is made in one of the quintessential mass production processes, but it ages decorously and manages to bond people to a sense of place despite its seemingly anonymity. Different clays from different locales produce different coloured bricks. Brick shapes, laying patterns, the decorative uses to which they're put (framing windows, creating ventilation, forming chimneys, etc.), and the materials with which the brick is intermixed (Portland stone, fieldstone, flint, etc.) all create a solid sense of place. Roman brick isn't London brick isn't Dutch brick. And anyone with a smattering of architectural knowledge can see that at a glance.

In a similar vein to St. Pancreas Station, the famous Neuschwanstein in Bavaria has more in common structurally with the Flatiron Building in NYC than it does with a traditional 'pile up stone until complete' castle. It's a proto-skyscraper cosplaying as a medieval castle - essentially a pastiche - but it's still aesthetically pleasing and a feats for the imagination. And why? All because the people involved cared about what they were building and lavished care and attention on their work.

The same thing happened in pre-war America. Things like the Chrysler Building and Hugh Ferris' famous fantasia paintings of skyscrapers show that even urban glass-and-steel monoliths don't have to be soulless. The soaring spires of the skyscrapers were part of a cultural continuity that extended back to the 'yearning for heaven and the sublime' seen in gothic cathedrals. There is a clear line from the Saint Chapelle in Paris to the Chrysler Building. Even the cityscapes of grimy industrial cities like Detriot,Mi or Gary,In were gracious, tasteful places fit for white men who sought better than their fathers had known.

Take all this data into account and the piss-poor aesthetics of modernist architecture are therefore shown up as a deliberate stylistic choice. Cheapness and philistinism as a design philosophy.

Brutalism (in the sense of fetishising naked concrete, a cheap material which does not age well) and the pernicious idea of a building as an interchangeable, disposable 'machine for living in' seem almost designed to detach people from a sense of scale and place. Sure, there was the excuse of rebuilding a Europe wrecked by war. But the sheer fucking ugliness of a lot of the new buildings was part of an ideological choice to build 'New Socialist/Capitalist Man'. You can see this in any Socialist-influenced shithole – the old Warsaw Pact, northern English industrial towns, the urban inner cities in America, the banlieus of Paris – all these places reflect the same envious, spiteful Year 0 mentality. Bulldoze the old townscape built up over centuries of muddle, compromise and adaptation to actual needs; ram the goyim cheek-by-jowl into stacked rabbit hutches to break up community bonds; and kill the sense of shared urban space by turning the shadowed fallows between into filthy no-go interzones.


You could entirely get away with it if you disguised the whole process under a thin veneer of modernity and progress:


Architects shouldn't be allowed. There's a reason that architecture-as-egotism is the subject of an entire sub-genre of critique. The visual lectures of a guy called Jonathan Meades are a good introduction to the pathologies of modern buildings.

(excuse rambling statements-of-the-obvious. This is one of my hobbyhorses.)

I know that was 99% likely a typo for 'good' but the idea of 'goof' architecture put me in mind of a guy called John Timpson. He did a series of coffee table books back in the 70s-80s picking out architectural and historical oddities in the townscapes and rural areas of Britain. The books make a strong case that even the most modest and prosaic of buildings can be charming, fun and uplifting.

By that logic shouldn't you make beauty available to every class?
( I know several anons have repeated this)
Kikes hate beauty as it reminds them of their ugliness.
Kikes want people to disassociate people with their cultural heritage and make them feel ugly like thier architecture.


I'm going into architecture and I want my buildings speak for themselves. Like the ancient cathedral builders who were completely unknown.
It's the building that matters, not the person.

Very important point. Look at Art-Deco; it's a deliberate choice between beauty and ugliness

You are now aware of the fact, that the pope audience hall symbolises the head of a snake!


well if he hasn’t then your 275x183 sure won't help him see much either!

Why can't we get trump to push for anything & everything remotely beautiful and historical to be added to some list that prevents buildings from being torn down before his first term is up?

What the actual fuck, that must be on purpose.

I think this one has a positive note. We know we don't need to demolish everything to make it ugly, the opposite should apply as well

this is what keeps me up at night

Any architects here? I’m looking for a bit of advice. Especially pertaining to portfolio's

Plugging facebook.com/ArchMMXII

If you're going to be an architect and hope to change the cityscape, I'll give you a word of advice don't. You still work for a customer and serve the customers wants. Big company x doesn't care about your beautiful vision and neither does your average home owner. You'll most likely end up finalizing McDonald's prototypes to meet municipal and state code.

If you want to change the cityscape, become the money behind the building.

t. Civil engineer who worked with Architects

Pic one makes me so fucking angry I don't have words

Here's what happen if the other side had won the war. Hitler considered possibly becoming an architect and studied it to some degree before going to Vienna and trying his hand at art. Him and Albert Speer spent quite a bit of time designing plans for a complete remodeling and renaming of Berlin post-war, Welthauptstadt Germania (World Capital Germania)

Some features of it

Hard to believe it's real.

Do post them.

Worst part is that it's in the UK, where they have even more grandiose and architecturally interesting buildings.

There's a bit on modern architecture in "why beauty matters" by Roger Scruton, you might find it interesting. Look it up yourself, you lazy git, it's all over the web

Oh, and have a pic related.

I live in an earthquake-prone area and reinforced concrete is a miracle material. Enjoy getting trapped in a pile of rubble, brickfag.

Full retard, (1).

I don´t remember it very clearly, but modernism was all the rage in Europe pre ww2, then it come the war and some ((architects)) ran to the US with their style. Obviously it clashed with the local american style (it still goes hard, just go to houzz and search around the most voted things), meanwhile modernistic things are all relegated to rich faggots and idealists. But it´s their money so heh.

t. architect.

Some interiors are pretty good, first looks like a gold palace interior, third pic looks like a Greek Temple and second pic an Oniric vision.

On architecture, to be honest the building isn't that different from those nearby. Looks like one trying to blend in.

And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up

It's more like half the world, but okay.


culturewars.com/Reviews/LivingMachinesReviews.html

I just don't understand why people hate concrete.

you could've just said third world

Majoring in that. How hard were the classes? Especially the math part. Tips for your volk?

believe it or not, commie blocks are efficient

I'm an architect.

The only ones these days that realistically want the beautiful European architecture are ironically the rich oil Muslims and Chinese for some reason. I personally think it's a bit disgusting. Like those monkeys think they can be European but alas they have better taste than actual Europeans around me these days so we will continue with postmodern artlessness.

If you're lucky you get shiny rectangles. Most of what I see is gray concrete with dark stains where water has deposited filth and everywhere there are signs either advertising a product or informing me of laws. The only unifying aesthetic is decay.

it's like those japanese towns/amusement parks that try to mirror european towns (from Sweden, Germany, Spain and so on) and are done in the traditional style. It's ironic in the way that if we don't stop this madness, soon enough we'll need to travel to japan to admire the european traditions

Is that realy good? I fucking hate China mirroring the Eiffel tower or some random village in France in one of their unoriginal hellhole of a country.

holy shit, stop being a jew.

I wonder (((who))) would do such a thing? I'm sure it feels cozy for them everywhere they go if everything looks and feels the same. Everything that becomes generic is devoid aesthetics because they want to build things that "everyone can agree on." Even (((their))) Temple is probably brutalist in nature.

dr. ahmed I'm mr trump

Fucked up, meant only Futurism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurist_architecture

It is not about concrete itself, but about not abandoning vernacular culture to replace it with foreign (or alien) structures. The local style evolved through generations and seasons, for specific purposes which favored certain structures over others. Bringing modernist/idealist architectures from overseas, and replacing some veins of labor, is bad for the local culture because it forgets it´s roots. Example: inca buildings have slanted walls, but spaniards laughed at them and replaced a lot with vertical walls. But the laughter stopped when they had their first earthquake and died under those stones. Another example are the steep sloped roofs for snow. It will be dangerous to just import flat mediterranean roofs 'because it looks cool' without dealing with all the reinforrcements to perform just as fine as the vernacular roofs.

You could keep some aspects of local culture and add technologies or do some experiments (and research) before building anything, because it will be a large and expensive object that has to be inhabited through years and shape experiences of life and community (unless you are building in Vegas).

I can't believe my eyes. It's like a bad dream.

Because all beauty is made to glorify god.(truth)

God(truth) has been removed.

So you get no more beauty until you reestablish worship of truth(god).

You know why they do that right?

Over time those bullshit structures cause water damage to the target areas of the lower structures, and eventually the cost of repairs will make it cheaper to just demolish the lower half and build a new concrete fucking block.

Mark my words, you'll see this happen in the future if you don't do something about it.

……

The Hebrews became Druids and the Gothic cathedrals were built with the help of Daemons.

But it's also more-or-less a logical step - soulless materials, soulless building. Glass, concrete and steel are inhuman materials that result in inhuman buildings with inhuman proportion, usually grotesquely grown out of extant styles. Early skyscrapers are basically row houses on steroids and humanizing these things is very difficult.

St Pancreas Station in London, for example, is brick and decorative stone over a steel frame, essentially the same structural forms as a Victorian warehouse or office block or prison.
It was also built in 1868, well before the advent of abundant glass, steel and concrete and at a period in time when the design was contemporary.

Of course. But not every building - especially ones built from cheaper materials - can afford to look so pretty and this becomes truer and truer as the height of the building increases and the relationship to mankind decreases.

Right. And the level of autism and beauty in Neuschwanstein still exists in residences that are built by the wealthy even today.

But they are, though.

Gothic architecture is extremely overrated and most of the people who lick its feet tip either fedoras or crosses. Divine inspiration is around us, not above us.

Yeah, but the skyscrapers didn't help.

Oh, absolutely. Like I said, the Marxists took the modernism meme and weaponized it.

I agree entirely. Bolshevism in concrete.

Instincts are almost as shit as anti-aesthetics as a foundation for your buildings.

Architects should absolutely be "allowed" and even encouraged. We just need to do away with the current paradigms in architecture.


Yeah, because it's pushed by Marxists.

I'll look into them.

Did that fifth pic ever come to pass? I was reading on it the other day, and there was nothing concerning the rebuilding of the modernist facade, although it did mention it's a museum to nigger shit.

It's fine though. The building stands. The nigger shit can be removed when we purge the scum

I live in the greater Lisbon area.
A fucking random Portuguese in the 18th century build aesthetically pleasing buildings built, even at the time, to endure Earthquake.
You telling me we can't do that now? In the CURRENT YEAR!
Marquis of Pombal laughs at your faggotry.

WTF

Prior to the takeover of our civilization by a hostile elite in the 20th century, Western culture was ever guided by the principles of the Sublime and the Beautiful. But once the modernists gained hegemonic power, ugliness became the de rigueur standard in any paintings that were painted, any buildings that were erected, any poetry that was penned, and any music that was composed.

Why, one look at this magnificent castle tells you immediately when it was created. Surely this is a pre-modern masterpiece, either an original Gothic fortress from the Middle Ages or a Neo-Gothic marvel constructed in the 19th century, right?


Wrong. It is Brecqhou Castle, built on the Channel Islands in …1996.

But this, this magnificent edifice which so closely resembles the Hofburg palace in Vienna, this is undoubtedly a product of late-1800s Historicism, correct?


No. It is the Agriculture Complex Administration building in Kazan, Russia, built in . . . 2010, perhaps the finest public edifice erected in the last half-century, anywhere in the world.

Ah, but here, here we clearly see an ancient Anglo-Saxon church, powerful and steadfast, with thick masonry designed to repel ancient Viking attacks.


Actually, it is Our Lady of Walsingham Catholic Church. Built in 2003.

Next, we must surely be looking at the wing of an Oxbridge or Ivy League school, fashioned in the 19th century in a splendid Gothic Revival style.


Right style, wrong date. This is the University of Connecticut Law School Library in Hartford, Connecticut, completed in 1996.

Is this the British Museum,? No, it's a bit too small for that, but surely such a fine Neoclassical structure was also constructed by the Victorians, those titans under whose wise leadership the British Empire reached its apogee.


Incorrect. It is the Tuscaloosa Federal Building, opened in …2011.

And what of this stunning interior? A Parisian train station of the 1800s, perhaps, converted to other use?


Nope. It is the Kenan Pavillion of the Flagler Museum, in Palm Beach, Florida, completed in 2005 and billed as "the first public Beaux Arts-style building built in the United States in six decades."

The lush greenery and blue sky might tip off the viewer that the following marvel is to be found in India. Therefore, surely it must be one of the great Victorian imperial buildings erected by the British in the 19th century to administer the "jewel in the crown" of their great empire.


In fact, this is the Infosys Campus, found in Mysore, built by an Indian firm in 2005, and a remarkable architectural tribute to the nation's great colonial heritage.

Finally, a glimpse at what clearly must be a Gothic or Neo-Gothic interior space. Just look at those Medieval-style windows. Pure Middle Ages.


Actually, pure 2010. The New Dormitory of Meier Hall, part of Elmira College, New York, completed just three years ago.

The following graphic features, on the left, an image of a cozy little English village, with its centuries-old pretty buildings, above a noble, stately, Neoclassical structure, both exemplifying the beauty tradition in Western architecture. On the right, in opposition, looms an image of regimented, cubicle-like living spaces above a brutalist, concrete-and-steel box of a public building, both epitomizing the Cultural Marxist world in which we are now forced to live, due to the hegemony of the hostile elite. The graphic asks us to "Imagine a World without Modernism," i.e., a world without such monstrosities, a world of traditional beauty.

The next graphic, "Art Then, Art Now," memorably illustrates how badly our culture has degenerated over the past century. It shows Delacroix's Liberty Leading the People alongside two classical sculptures, all three works representing the noble, beautiful ideals that Western art embodied then, versus a ludicrous abstract sculpture consisting of a blob amid concrete walls, as well as a supposed painting that looks like a kitchen counter mounted on a wall, to epitomize art now.

A similar graphic presents an image of a splendid, Neo-Romanesque building alongside painted masterpieces in a grand gallery, juxtaposed with a grim, grey cube that looks more like a prison block than an office building and a modern gallery filled with ludicrous splotches of paint slathered onto indistinguishable canvasses. "Architecture and Art Then; Architecture and Art Now" it is called, showing how far our culture has fallen from "then" till "now."

Dude, you can post several images at once.
Go in five-round bursts.

A more hopeful graphic, on the other hand, shows how even a product of the bleakest modernism can be reconfigured into an attractive form, if principles of beauty are applied, just as even a starving, skeletal runway waif can blossom into a goddess if she indulges herself freely and gains generous amounts of weight, thus accruing femininity-developing figure fullness.

Now, we've all been assaulted by the sight of ugly, soulless, modernist buildings. Indeed, it seems hard to step out of one's door and avoid seeing one of these brutalist horrors.

However, a horrific recent development in architecture that may be even worse than the construction of new modernist monstrosities, and that is the phenomenon of parasitism.
The Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, once a regal, 19th-century, Historicist marvel, now blighted by the addition of a twisted mass of steel girders sheathed in aluminum.
An architectural "parasite," then, is an incongruously ugly, modern appendage that has been affixed to a formerly beautiful, traditional building, an addition that looks like a nightmarish tumour on formerly healthy living tissue.

Perhaps the world's most offensive example of an architectural parasite blights the following building, the only museum in Dresden that was not destroyed by the Allied terror-bombing campaign of 1945. The very fact that this one museum did survive the war obviously made it a target of particular resentment to the modernists, so the architect who was put in charge of the building's "restoration" in the 2000s drove a hateful shard of iron and metal into the museum's heart, as if he were a murderer trying to slaughter the past, to kill the beauty ideal itself, to rape the very soul of the German nation.
Nowhere in the world is there a nation more vulnerable to the aesthetics of guilt (owing to the propaganda that has been levelled against it over the past 70 years) than Germany, so little wonder that the country is especially blighted by architectural parasites. The elegant Neoclassical façade of the famous Congress Hall in Nürnberg, for example, now suffers from what looks like a pair of gigantic metal shears tearing into its side, while a misshapen metal box perches crazily on top.


The creators of these architectural parasites go out of their way to defame the past by every means available to their warped minds, whether through violent ugliness, as shown above, or through idiotic lunacy, as seen in this picture of a pathetic addition to the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam, which resembles an oversized kitchen sink.


Most visibly parasitic of all is this nightmarish extension to the Port House in Antwerp. How fitting that the modernist addition should look like a gigantic cockroach, like a Lovecraftian terror out of a bad sci-fi film, about to prey on this vulnerable historic building beneath it. In just such a way has the legacy of Western culture been violated and ravaged by the resentful modernists, who hate its beauty with a zealotry bordering on fanaticism.

In 2010, the city of London tore down the beautiful, 19th-century Chelsea Barracks and intended to let modernist architects erect a grim regiment of glass-and-concrete boxes in their place until HRH The Prince of Wales interceded with the Saudi royal family (who owned the land) and lobbied for a more classical alternative.

The embedded video illustrates the vital necessity for a nation to be governed by a noble class with a royal family at its head. The arrogant, elitist architects in the video show absolute contempt for the people who actually have to live in the buildings that they erect, and assert that only professional architects are entitled to have a say in artistic matters.

Their comments reveal how empty is the claim that in a democracy, "the people rule." In fact, in a democracy, the people are the powerless subjects of the plutocrats and the elites.

Prince Charles, on the other hand, does speak for the people. His preference for Beauty in architecture reflects the true taste of the public, and through him, the will of his subjects is manifested.

It is not a coincidence that modernism metastasized and the beauty tradition was displaced after the world wars, when the European aristocracy lost its political position. Historically, the nobility had ever been the check on the power of society's hostile moneyed elements, which always resented European civilization and sought to undermine it. Tragically, as the aristocracy was displaced, our culture was left vulnerable to enemy predations.

But the actions of the Prince of Wales in rescuing London from at least this one modernist blight exemplify how the nobility can still fulfill its traditional function, defending the European people and their culture from hostile forces. In centuries past, they would have done so with a sword in their hand; now, they do so via the pen, but the effort is just as heroic.

...

Those are nice, but the exceptions don't make the rule. Something, something, glass dildos in London and Barcelona.

Also, at least in the US, McMansions, big box and residential architecture generally are the bigger problem. Human geography and the psychology of place has an actual impact on quality of life. FLW tried to incorporate those ideas into affordable homes for the average American. I said it in another thread and I'll say it again here: we need an usonian revolution in architecture to restore the damaged collective psyche. Ordinary people deserve beauty. Not just wealthy universities and MNCs.

(((Libeskind)))

It just looks like the classic building is being teabagged by modernism. A disgusting display of globalist chauvinism.


This word drives me nuts. In the rush for "efficiency," we've thrown away community and belonging. Commieblocks and the like do not account for anything but a space to put bodies for a while. Even in societies with extreme optimization of resources such as communism, there is a need for people to come together instead of live in proximity of each other.

There is no reason why modernist garbage can't incorporate the same principles embraced by the traditional architects, but I'll be damned if I can find examples of it.

Godspeed

The point was that these buildings are still being built. Not necessarily en masse, but it's not like previous architectural styles have been erased from history.

Agreed a thousand times over. The main problem as I see it is that the people building and living in these glorified cucksheds have no understanding or respect for the context of the building. But that takes time and an understanding that most people either don't possess or eschew in favor of shekels (case in point, Arizona). Honestly, IMO the root cause of this misery is the fact that the West has become spoiled. We can afford to build, and re-build in any (((form))) desired with materials shipped thousands of miles and tacked together by illegals, kept heated or cooled by massive amounts of affordable energy. In a massive twist of irony, some of the most convicted leftists (hippies) have been keeping the torch of craftsmanship lit because they still possess a genuine spiritual thirst for a home, not merely a dwelling, and often work on a limited budget that incentivizes them towards building modestly, prioritizing functionality and getting the most aesthetic bang for their buck. It's still not fair to lay all of the blame on the designers, however, as any designer wishes to push the envelope to some degree (just look at some of the larger homes of the latter 19th century, especially those of the Shingle style) and materials like steel and glass simply beg' to be tall and angular because that is where their potential is. It would also be throwing out the baby with the bathwater to simply demonize all glass-and-steel/brutalist/etc. buildings; the vast majority might be disgusting eyesores but looking back while refusing to look forwards gets you nowhere.

A fusion of USonian, Arts and Crafts and regional influences would be god-tier.

first that came to mind

"Do a fucking flip faggot"
is what this building inspires.

I feel physically sick, looking at these.

Very "I'm a king of France between 1650 and 1800," vibe.

Here, read this:

www.amazon.com/Bauhaus-Our-House-Tom-Wolfe/dp/0312429142

Then add in Holla Forums's understanding of (((who))) pushed all this and why (alienation, revenge, etc.)

With that, you will understand post WW2 architecture better than 98% of professional architects.

PDF of it. "Most of the text originally appeared in the June and July 1981 issues of Harper’s. First eBook Edition: May 2011"
my.mixtape.moe/ipljph.pdf

Don't stop user. Sure a couple of lurkers are enjoying it as well.

We are literally breaking the conditioning.

Once the jewish anti-humanist hammerlock on aesthetics is completely broken, the beauty of western architecture will return with the shock of a thunderclap.

Modernism is a disgusting style as a general rule, but there are a few architects out there who are trying to make things that look at least somewhat beautiful or interesting. Pic related; I know the architect's college roommate.

I wish I knew that before. Well at least I've only done one week of my Bachelor of architectural design, I switched to a bachelor of Civil Engineering today but I have to wait until July for classes to start now. Which isn't too bad since I still need to finish building my PC since my other is starting to shit itself. I prefer mathematics so this degree is more to my liking and the fact that most of my teachers had thick foreign accents didn't help either.

Such beautiful design and vision, I hope to make uncle Adolf proud.

Rogers is jewish.

There's some good
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Classical_architecture

Some of the older buildings are also being revived in the UK, which is nice.

I wondered that and checked some online maps, doesn't seem to be much there.

Those first two pics hurt my fucking soul.

Looks like shit. Tell the roomate to tell the architect to kill himself.

Are you forgetting the number one rule for Jews when interacting with the goyim? "This is for me but not for thee."

Do those…. waves(?) serve a purpose aside from being eyesores?

(checked)
reeeeeeeeeee

talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/border-wall-prototypes-aesthetics
archive.is/FtRqZ
Apparently Trump wants the wall to be A E S T H E T I C

Do you guys think that he will add the same provisions in the infrastructure bill and make the country look good again?

St. Moritz, Augsburg, Germany
Bombed by RAF in 1944
Rebuilt into… ugh /facepalm

>tfw commie architecture actually used to be aesthetic as fuck
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinist_architecture

That's only because Stalin had nationalistic tendencies and kicked the Internationalist Trotskyites out of the USSR

It isn't about hating concrete. If it would be roman or just high quality concrete there wouldn't be a problem with withering concrete because of air bubbles and corroding reinforced concrete, jew. Oh and there is something called isolated bases.

In WWII, The United States kinda fought against European nationalism, in case you forgot.

as a lurker, thank you to all you anons who posted such inspirational content. I've been feeling rather worn out over these past few weeks and this thread has helped me rekindle my traditionalist spirits and energized me to return to the fight against (((globalism)))

this is a great thread, but everyone in it needs to go read Miles Mathis before they read even one more Holla Forums thread.
he's a realist / traditionalist painter who's spent his life making and defending non-pozzed art, but also he's a writer and researcher who's done fantastic work exposing exactly when and how art (and literature, and music, and obviously architecture like you're all talking about, and also history, physics, and science generally) got pozzed in the first place. (protip: it was the jews.)
YES, all of european civilization's beauty and meaning and inspiration, in all avenues of expression, have been under deliberate attack. you don't get to have nice things, goyim.

go fuck your ignorant self.

The USA is set up to be schizophrenic. That's one of many reasons the founders intended that there shouldn't be any entangling alliances, just trading friends.

Seems like our government forgets that part all the time. I agree the United States has become a degenerative influence on the world, we were never supposed to be in this position, we're supposed to be the Big Neutral. French, German, or English influence is the best in a cultural setting, historically speaking.

Fellner and Helmer style big architectural firms would be needed to build this type of architecture again.

GET THIS FUCKING VID OUT OF HERE REEEEEEEEEEEEE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
K
EFKE
WKW
K NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Here's a little side story about this sort of thing, the first two pics illustrate what's become of an old transportation museum in Budapest.

The second two pics are about the planned restoration work that has already begun on the building.

Jews went full REEE mode and began to try and stir up mass protests (paying druggies to sit near and be shits basically).

The same thing is happening to the old Buda palace, I'll post about that in a reply to this, hang on.

So here's how the castle/palace of Buda originally looked before world war 2. Highly ornate, Habsburg architecture.

This got bombed to fuck in WW2 and the russians stole all the gold and built it into the Moscow metro stations they like to parade around in pictures these days.

After the worlds shittiest "restoration it got turned into this back in the 60s. Now the hungarian government wants to rebuild it into it's old habsburg glory and you guessed it, jews are going ballistic "muh false history" and "muh art" crocodile tears everywhere. Last pic is some proposal for the restoration work of a couple of the blown out buildings.

Leftists have ugly souls, so they build ugly architecture. Hell I don't think they even have souls.

Thank God this cunt is gone off this earth. Now for her works to follow her to the ground

It's not as bad as the other boxy, concrete, class buildings, but for some reason, I feel physically sick looking at these pictures.

Wow. So beautiful, so eloquent, what is it user?

I was just about to make a thread asking if America had any of these old time architecture.

1) Because beauty and warmth requires money. Modernists ;) don't like to spend money

2) Beauty and warmth require effort. Modernists ;) are lazy

3) Beauty and warmth inspire and create happiness. Modernists ;) are unhappy and want others to be unhappy

They are just pretending, with “Disney World”, Las Vegas architecture.


Gross


No need to copy old styles there are aesthetic “modern” buildings as well:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilehaus

...

(((Modern))) buildings look like 3D models stuck in the prototype phase

I will never understand how we could allow these tasteless monstrosities to be built and rape our beautiful heritage.

The real problem is within.

Studying in the capital has been fun. And I've sort of got a good gist of what's also happening here. Here a lot of the old architecture is mixing in with the modernistic Communist architecture and with this even newer one. For these first pictures it's all mostly either some of the older architecture or some Communist architecture.

Some buildings like that Museum of History used to be a mosque but were restored and repurposed. I'll start posting some gommie flats now alongside some newer flats too.

Here is one of the many districts in the capital, Mladost 1. It goes up to 4 or 5 at the moment I think? It's a lot and I do mean a lot of socialist architecture with Mladost 1 and 2 actually looking surprisingly nice. Very clean, very clean flats as well and actually quite pleasant. The thing to keep in mind as well is that as ugly as some of these flats might be, they're some of the sturdiest things. We had a huge earthquake happening in the country and since then every single one of those flats was fortified to crazy proportions so they don't collapse. They might be ugly (or not so ugly if kept well) but they sure as heck are impressive when it comes to their durability. And the brick ones (like the one I live in) are actually rather cozy.

Someone have been inspired by Leon Krier, no?

Now for some of the newer architecture. We'll start with the less common ones. These are typically office buildings or apartment complexes. They're big, bulky, sometimes pretty, sometimes ugly. They're not the most common and they won't pop up in most cities since most cities will still be using the Socialist offices or apartments. There is another type of architecture that is very common from the newly build flats and I'll try to find a picture.

Found a few. These seem to be either semi or fully roofed flats. Some can be rather tall and seem more Socialist but the majority tend to be 5-6 stories high. They look rather nice and end up making the Socialist cities look less dull and gray. And finally one more thing to add on my long posts of buildings.

Even with the dullness of the Socialist flats, most are panel based. This means they are sturdy as fuck but they tend to be very badly isolated. Brick Socialist flats are a different story. However, usually people have to spend money to isolate their flats which causes them to become stupidly colorful and ugly on the outside. Luckily there are programs that allow you to get the entire flat isolated as long as the people living in the flat agree to it. I'll post some pictures. It finally started happening here as well and the restored flats look very very nice.

Sorry for the stock photos but generally things here are improving more and more with each year. I don't know what's happening elsewhere however. One thing I'll say is with the right attitude and not building unfixable buildings like and . Strange shapes don't really do much for living comfort inside either. While my country is full of modernistic architecture it almost never goes to such extremes. Because of that it's mostly doable to fix it or at least to make it presentable.

Here is an upcoming travesty in Copenhagen, Denmark.
First two pictures is Palads (Palace) theatre, finished in 1918 and painted in its iconic, if a bit gaudy, colour-scheme during renovations in 1989
The 3nd picture is the proposed replacement. The city has since the 20s wanted to cover the nearby railroad, but the project was until recently been shelved first for economic reasons, then for practical and later for lack of concent from the state railroad company. But now that the FUCKING STATE RAILROAD COMPANY owns Palads, they will allow the railway to be covered on condition that they get to TEAR DOWN Palads (which is a protected building) and use its plot and the plot resulting from covering the railroad to build a monstrosity that will ruin the entire area.

Fuck modernists.

So they're turning a threatre into a mall? Those 2 are not compatible with each other.

Seriously, it looks like this mall.

even now, they steal your culture white man
you should smash those fucking windows and tell them thats only for goys

The plans for the new building suggest it is going to contain a new theatre, shops on street level and then an unspecified distribution of offices and apartments in the upper parts of the monstrosity.
So not a mall as such, all shops will point out towards the street and there is going to be a park the middle.

Reminds me of how cinemas and theatres here are completely different. Even during Socialism here they built theatres in a very nice looking architecture. But cinemas were usually extremely gross.

Pics related are an old Roman theatre and a cinema in Plovdiv. Although you can find plenty of good theatres built during Socialism but any cinema usually looks like the second pic. I mean, it's not that the building is that bad or anything but it doesn't make sense for it to also have a theatre. It's just plain old ugly for that.

NEVER FORGET

Commieshits destroyed this entire city

I personally think that the main problem with modernism is that apart from architects becoming lazy like modern artists and expecting people to like their shit. The shapes they incorporate are unnatural and not uniform.
People like being around nature as it's good for our self-esteem and wellbeing.
As modern buildings have unnatural shapes and materials they feel alienating and uncomfortable.

well in eastern europe there was alot built under socialism, mostly because they wanted to show everyone how mighty and productive socialism is.
western europe meanwhile was just circlejerking in liberalism and decided to build shit according to a thousand and one -ism of art they could think of

I know we like to say that it's always jews om Holla Forums. But was it actually jews?

im sure any otherarmy would do better

Yeah. Basically, due to building artistic nonsense that not everyone would enjoy, they made it very hard if possible at all to visually improve. Not only that but Socialism architecture here is sturdy and actually quite practical. I've already shown in and that it's quite fixable and can even look quite nice. Sure, you could turn a crumbled piece of paper into a building and let an architect masturbate his mind into creating it but would everyone want it? How do you then fix said crumbled piece of paper building?

And if you want the exact reason why under Socialism we did this, it's not just to show how productive we are but to show how modern we are. Literally following modernism in the idea that we are modern and so we could demonstrate the so called nearing of Communism with the collapse of currency and following our goal of only having to defeat nature instead of each other and yada yada. Interpreted in another way, you could say that the people that did know what the world was outside of the Eastern bloc couldn't just accept that after the 70's, we begun to plummet more and more behind the capitalist countries that had at that point begun outproducing us simply due to the fact that most of the tech was already invented and now it needed to be improved. Under Socialism everything is built to last, not to be improved. Now it's proven that architecture that is Socialistic can mostly be improved but the artsie shit is doomed.

Bought from Norway, brought to Poland. Literally transferred.

thats quite well written, yes

Hail Europa

Good luck. The problem is always (((the budget.))) The cost of building a gothic cathedral today like Notre Dame de Paris would cost (((billions.)))

The best place to try and bring back beauty is actually in places where the client has infinite resources like the Church used to. This is why shitskin Gulfies in Dubai spend money on architecture.

If you had a shitskin or billionaire patron that wanted to bring back craftsmanship and art in architecture, that's the only way.

Otherwise, move to a state where building permits are easy to get and design beautiful add-ons to really rich folks' homes. That's how (((Frank Gehry))) started to make a name for himself.

Personally, I think (((budget))) is bullshit because Art Nouveau architecture in the early 1900's combined modern industrial techniques with fine and artful craftsmanship. Plus, most patrons weren't royalty or the Church, but wealthy people in Vienna, Austria, for instance.

Your also forgetting governments, large NGO's and Big business.

Raising rent.