Canadian Publicly-funded News Station put Pedophilia Apologist Article on Front Page

CBC has an article on its front page today that appears to excuse a 21 year old man that works at a children's complex for attempting to date a 14 year old girl. He was caught in a sting operation executed by the vigilante group the "Creep Busters".

The article tries to play up ADHD as a major learning disability that somehow excuses pedophilia. Comments are also disabled.

cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/creep-busters-ambush-of-man-with-mental-disability-called-vigilantism-1.4009147

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism
nber.org/chapters/c10271.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Going to get in a current year man post before the pedos show up and the thread goes to shit.

Here's another article in which the CBC seemingly endorses violence against "racists".

It's crazy because ADHD isn't even close to that debilitating. I've had ADHD my whole life and using it as an excuse for interest in young girls makes be rage so hard. I want out of this forsaken country.

bbb…but bullying is bad!

Canada worse than Sweden

just fuck my country up

Checked. And, you don't have a disability, psychology is a Jewish machination that succeeded brilliantly in creating an entire industry that serves to delegitimize their opponents (Trump needs to be examined by a psychiatrist!), justify the wicked (see this article), and make a stunning percentage of Americans consume mind altering drugs. All this with virtually no scientific basis for the entire discipline, save Behaviorism, which was more or less abandoned by the field since it actually worked.

Keep in mind, by the way, that a large reason they're pushing this more and more, is that many of the vibrant, culturally diverse people they're bringing into places like Canada will not ever follow our consent laws. So, just like in everything else, the West must be made to adapt to their culture, so we too can become a people who marry off teenagers to their first cousin or uncle for the next few hundred years, until our IQ standard deviates lower than that of Sub Saharan Africans.

If Trump ever goes full commie skull cracking, I hope that you guys will accept some of Canadians to come down and join the army. This country is just Sweden with a better hockey team.

You don't attempt to date a 14 year old if you're 21. The only way it makes sense is in the perfect world (no longer exists) where your families know each other for a long time and it was/is planned for you both to marry at some point. Thus getting to know each other since youth being important. To just be trying to flirt with someone that young is fucked up considering I doubt he had the parent's permission.
Also, ADHD might make you hyper and what not and, maybe, just maybe, it makes it so that you feel an inclination to act on your tendencies. However, the tendency itself is separate, and if you feel as if you would possibly act on such a dangerous tendency (pedophilia/hebephilia), then you should see a doctor. Sadly, no doctor would probably accept you for such a thing and at best you'd get a Jewish psychiatrist to get you all medicated up (or, since we're in the modern day, to tell you it's ok).

It's not pedophilia. It's completely normal to be attracted to sexually mature females. This girl may also look much older, as they often do. I don't know why this always has to be explained. I'm not saying their defense of him is right or that there's nothing wrong with screwing minors, either.

Did you even read the article before posting? he'd never met her, it was a fake character created online by a vigilante group. he knew she was 14 before even trying to meet her.

I honestly think you guys are worse off, Sweden is only importing sandniggers, Canada has them, and chinks destroying their real estate market on top of that.

Poor people in Canada don't care where there tax money is going. They're perfectly fine with this. Poor people, even poor whites, are niggers.

Crime statistics and welfare participation rates amongst poor blacks vs poor whites would disagree with that statement.

The poor in general commit more crimes than the middle class and above. The poor should be gotten rid of first.

the low-educated in general commit more crimes, and poor, rural communities are much less educated and have lower IQs.

the solution is not to get rid of all of our countrymen (some OK), but to stop immigration and ensure better learning environments for children with shitty parents.

This isn't pedophilia. He was contacted by someone claiming to be a 19-year-old girl who only later changed her story and said she was 14. He didn't initiate the conversation and he wasn't seeking out a 14-year-old girl. You don't have to be a full-blown downie to fall for something like this, I could easily see a mildly dim guy with a 90-ish IQ and some social ineptitude getting suckered in. This is the kind of shit (((they))) do to distract from the real pedo problem, which is (((elites))) enslaving kids and passing them around, not lonely weirdos trying to get laid online and making a dumb decision.

He was a creepy 21 year old working at a kids place that the group suspected of being a creep.

Her profile said she was 19, and then once she contacted him she advertised herself as 14, before they agreed to meet.

I do agree that the fact he wanted to meet her at work is a sign of retardation, but we should be condemning it instead saying on the national news that it's OK because low IQ. Who else has low IQ? Refugees.

Wasn't 14 the AoC on Leafland until just a few years ago?

Even giving education to the poor won't change them. Historically it has been the poor who cause the troubles in society. Jews love the poor, Marx advocated for the "Workers", while modern Jews kvetch at rich goyim for their lack of "charity". Jews are kings, gods amongst the underclass.

Yes, now it's 16 IIRC.

The poor and lower middle class whites in this country are the ones who voted Trump in. The upper class whites predominantly voted for Hilary. What a surprise that people who have done well in a Jewish run system want to maintain and expand that system at the expense of everyone else.

14? And 6 year difference?

At least she was over 12

He claims he didn't work with kids.
If he'd actually tried to fuck a 14-year-old, that would be something to condemn. There's no evidence he actually did that.
Yes, and rapefugee abuse of children looks nothing at all like this. They kidnap girls (also boys), some much younger than 14, and pass them around as sex slaves. All this guy did was get catfished by a person who he initially thought was a 19-year-old girl.

The lower-middle class aren't poor. I'm talking about wiggers and the people who live in utter squalor, not the rural folk, the simple middle class folk. They're fine, and all the wealth spent on welfare for the poor should be allocated to those people. The poor should die or become slaves once more.

That's not a pedo.

A few decades ago they would have two children and a house already.

Rural folk are the poorest whites, though. The rural whites are the ones that receive the most welfare, by far, of whites. When you talk about poor whites, that's who you are talking about. If you're basing peoples worth in how successful and established they are in a Jewish economic system, you should be a liberal.

These kinda are my thoughts as well. I'm not so concerned over what a dumb 21yro virgin is trying to do when there's a 50 year old kike with blue barrels in his basement. Teenagers find themselves sneaking in college nigger spic parties all the time and it is RAMPANT. Media should not defend pedophilia at all, but its funny that when they do its a white male.

Also this. 14 would have been 100% fine for civilized courtship for most of white history (not degenerate modern dating where you fuck her on the first date and dump her by the fourth, but preparing for marriage in a year or two). Most Europeans didn't marry until their early twenties but that was primarily for economic reasons, girls in the nobility married that young all the time.

(checked)

Impressive digits.

i'm not too worried about the 21 year old either, but my point of posting was to show how shit our state-funded media is billing him as a mentally-challenged individual because of ADHD, and how it's a %100 lawful excuse for a 21 year old wanting to date a 14 y/o

So many pedos and irresponsible virgins in this thread who can't handle adult women older than 18 years old. Teens are full of hormones and can't control their emotions, so relationships with them are quick, they tend of getting bored with their boyfriends in few months, if not weeks. Only women who save their virginity up to 20 years old are worth of marrying.
The real solution is not to marry early, but to save virginity longer. Women need to save themselves from degeneracy just like you do.

Hey, at least our cities are entertaining. Wish more riots would happen, would be the most passive aggressive shit you have ever seen. I live in the country and haven't seen anyone who isn't white in over 5 months. Don't know how you faggots do it.

Who gives a shit if some retarded 21 yo tried to get a 14 yo girlfriend, a 14 year old isnt really a child anyways. How about we focus on the mudshites that constantly and brutally rape, beat and murder children as young as possible.

Good luck finding a 20 year old virgin mate.

CANADIANS FIGHT BACK

It just makes us richer you jealous Swede.

You're fucking retarded. Chinks make it so owning a house is near impossible for the average Canadian without becoming a debt slave. It doesn't help anyone but zipperheads and kikes.

I'm not retarded motherfucker!

Apparently you are. Let me guess you're a lolberg and believe in muh free market Jewry. What chinamen does makes the cost of life increase, it doesn't make any Canadian richer. Get out.

Get out you commie kike!

National Socialism is a capitalist ideology!

National socialism was against both commies and capitalists. Thanks for proving my point about you being retarded.

It allowed for private property and had numerous companies with shareholders who profited from them.
Just because Hitler pushed in a certain direction, doesn't make it non-capitalist.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

No, leaf, TAKE IT BACK.

And here already are the pedokikes, come to shit up the thread.

It's a third position, taking the benefits of both capitalism and socialism and creating the greatest economics system in history.

Saying National Socialism is capitalism is like saying a mule is a horse.

There was no such things as shareholders under the NSDAP. Point 11 of the German National Socialist Program prevented unearned income, including dividends, and at the same time banned usury and made previous debt void.

encouraged and assisted gentile founder families in retaining control over
their firms (Joly 1998, p. 111). In 1932, on the eve of the Nazis’ ascent to
power, the number of stock corporations stood at 9,634 (see figure 4.1).
With the government incentives instituted under the new regime, many
AGs went private and their numbers quickly dropped to pre-WWI levels
(about 5,500 in 1938) and dwindled slightly after that. By 1943, 5,359 stock
corporations remained. For this period, data on ownership and control are still sorely lacking, and nothing very precise can be said as of yet.
4
One
thing is clear: the Nazi regime brought great turmoil to the German cor-
porate landscape and permanently altered the patterns of corporate own-
ership and governance. While they promoted private ownership, the Nazis
simultaneously pushed centralization of control in crucial industries. As it
was in so many other ways, the Nazi period was an exception to German
economic, political, and legal traditions, and one that would have contin-
ued ramifications for decades to follow.

nber.org/chapters/c10271.pdf


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany

Read a book, nigger. Before the 19th century western culture never had a problem with teenage girls who have gone through puberty getting married. It wasn't typical, but it happened and nobody saw a moral problem with it. Nobody's going to defend actual pedophilia here, because we're not kikes or muzzies, and nobody's going to defend adult men fucking teenage girls without marrying them, because we're not feminists.

Whites absolutely do need to be marrying earlier. In the teens doesn't have to (and probably shouldn't be) the norm, but the current norm of women waiting until 30 or later for marriage is absolutely insane.

Kill yourself kike.

"Mike Morris, the B.C. solicitor general and minister of public safety"

Get a load of that cheese pizza eating looking faggot.

Fuck off, Chaim.

There's a reason why the CBC (state-sponsored) news bothered publishing this. It fit's in with their narrative. Soon migrants will be raping young girls all over the place. This news piece, and I'm sure more to follow, are an attempt to normalize the behavior and desensitize people to it. That way when radicals do start raping our children, they can just call it a 'mental disorder' and then wipe their hands of it.

How the fuck is this pedophilia? 14 year olds are already have tits and ass. 14 years old was literally the year girls were married off during the Roman Empire and even far later in European history. Marie Antoinette was 14 when she was married. Quit getting your cock twisted up and realise that the age difference is not the problem - the problem is our modern degenerate hook up culture which encourages young people to fuck around. 14 year olds are already on the cock carousel, so don't spout any nonsense about "muh innocent chillunz bein aboosed"

In radicalized Islamic culture it's perfectly normal to be married off at 10 or 11 years old. The priority is for the girl to be married to her Uncle. If Uncle is unsuitable then 1st cousin is next in line. We had to learn these things prior to deploying to Afghanistan.

Not all of them, but it's certainly true that many 14yr old girls nowadays have already been corrupted by our (((media))) and its subversion

Of course not all, but at that age girls are already sexually developed and exploring this sexuality. In previous centuries it was entirely normal for a 14+ year old girl to be married off by her parents, but now girls are kept in a state of limbo where they are unable to marry and start a family, but are nonetheless sexually active. This is dysgenic because it encourages sexual promiscuity while entirely stripping away all sense of responsibility attached to sex. Basically our laws encourage young women in their early teens to act like promiscuous whores by artificially removing all possibility of starting a family and settling down.

but getting beat up is what teaches people to be racist.
we stockholm now?
UNACCEPTABLE

i was sexually mature and masturbating at 8yrs old.
so what you're saying is that i should have been married and having sex at 8yrs old.

how about no and learn to keep it in your pants because sex isn't the most import fucking thing in the world.
degenerate.

This is a stupid fucking comparison and you know it, dipshit. You were not sexually mature at 8 because you had not yet gone through puberty. Unless you have some unknown medical condition, I can say this with 100% certainty. Not only are men and women biologically different resulting in men maturing slower than females (which already shreds your bullshit false equivalency), but there are very clear societal expectations that refute your nonsense. Men are supposed to work and support a family. Women are supposed to give birth and raise children. The man needs to be already older with more life experience and a stable income before he can marry, while a woman doesn't. Your example was so fucking stupid it almost feels like an insult having to explain this to you. There is LONG historical precedence for sexually developed 14 year old girls marrying men and starting a family. Hell, this was literally the standard age at which women were considered ready for marriage during the Roman Empire. Heard of the place? How you drew some kind of parallel between that and you jerking off at the age of eight is beyond me, but all I know is that you're one dimwitted motherfucker.
And where did I imply such a thing, you illiterate nigger-tier retard? Why don't you re-read my posts again and try to suppress that primal monkey knee-jerk reaction?

...

its not technically pedophilia. pedophiles don't like developed bodies are exclusively attracted to children 11 and under because theres no grass on the field and absolutely no growth.

this can't be a difficult concept for you guys to understand.

the media is the culprit equating the word pedophile with attractions up to the age of 17.

you're saying that 14 yr old girls should be married off because they're sexually mature.
i was equating that we me being married off at 8 due to my sexual maturity.

bullshit.
kids are being taught that sex is much more valuable than it is. it's glorification is indicative of our cultures being turned to shit. how fucking shit does our culture have to be that all sorts of weird sex is the fucking focal point. it belongs in imaginationland in a dark corner somewhere. if it doesn't stop, the general culture will become a year round LGBTBBQ parade.
the contrary should happen and kids should grow up focusing on philosophy and science and choosing a partner based on more valuable things than sex when they're more capable than a 14 yr old of making a wise decision for themselves.

And I'm saying that you're a fucking idiot because there's no way you were sexually mature at the age of 8. Is it really so hard for your stupid monkey brain to grasp that? Girls are sexually mature at 14 and should be married off. There is plenty of historical precedent for this which you seem to ignore in favour of your retarded false equivalency. There is absolutely no parallel between a sexually mature 14 year old girl marrying a man and your eight your old ass jacking off. What you don't seem to understand is jacking off does not equal sexual maturity. My god you're a stupid motherfucker.
Who the fuck is even promoting that garbage ITT? Quit preaching to the quire, dipshit.
Men, yes. Women should be married off in their early teens just as our ancestors did for thousands of years. Women have no need for "focusing on philosophy and science". Their role in society is to bear and raise the future generations. Get your feminist bullshittery out of here, faggot.
Who said anything about marrying based purely on sex? I'm getting really sick and tired of your empty strawmen that don't represent my argument in the slightest.
You're trying to tell me that 18+ year old women are somehow better at making decisions than 14 year old women? Despite all the fucking evidence around you? Despite the rabid feminist-induced hook-up culture that these "responsible women" indulge in to their hearts' content? Topkek. Women should be making decisions anyway. Their marriages should take place with the blessing and approval of their fathers JUST AS OUR ANCESTORS DID FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

I'm tired of teaching you basic shit, you fucking ape.

B-but Mary was 12 when she was betrothed to Joseph…

And a Jewish boy becomes a man at 13…

You know that arrest of Marc Emery wasn't for the weed, right?

This.

The real problem is economic. Young men are kept in a state of economic infancy until mid 20s. The natural way would be for them to fully independent by 16-18. If you restore economic independence to young men through viable trades program then young girls could marry their childhood sweathearts and you'll preserve chastity and romance.

It's not previous centuries, you fucking pedophile, 14 year olds can do whatever they feel like with other 14 year olds, big difference between a couple months older and a decade older.
not a fucking argument