In 2016 the lumpen are the new proletaritat

Think about it who have been the most active in pushing for change in the past ten or so years, prisoners have organized the largest strike of this century, Occupy wall street, and the S█████ campaign were pushed by in large by the unemployed & or under employed (Yes I know they're reformists but it is something and they can be pushed), and African Americans who have been hit harder by unemployment, and homelessness more then any other group in america

Now that's not to say that workers haven't done productive things but most of the ones who have done something work in the service industry namely teachers, and fast food employees, and look at how many of the old school unions have endorsed Hillary fucking Clinton.

Other urls found in this thread:

rapidtables.com/tools/line-graph.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Of course the obvious concern comes from how would you organize the lumpen in the first place

See: The recent prison labor strike. I don't see why lumpens couldn't organize for a common goal

I feel like the best way to get are movement across would be to set up shelters of sorts so that way we can show the lumpen directly how we benefit them

That's what I was referring to

Lumpen here. My answer is "yes, but we need to start holding leftist ideals instead of putting all of our energy into putting spinning rims on our trailers".

Yes. but how can the unemployed, the impoverished and the idle advocate revolutionary change successfully? What kind of ideology and vision of society could they advocate, without the post-industrial labor aristocracy turning on them and embracing reactionary politics to protect their muh privileged status and wages?

The only classes to bring about communist revolutions were peasants and lumpen. Marx was completely wrong about "the proletariat". Workkkers are reactionary.

so how exactly do we solve the problem of blacks, and their general inability to escape poverty?

"Consequently, there is only one solution to this deadlock, the one we find in another field of disposing waste, that of trash bins. Public trash bins are more and more differentiated today. There are special bins for paper, glass, metal cans, cardboard package, plastic, etc. Here already, things sometimes get complicated. If I have to dispose of a paper bag or a notebook with a tiny plastic band, where does it belong? To paper or to plastic? No wonder that we often get detailed instruction on the bins, right beneath the general designation: PAPER–books, newspapers, etc., but NOT hardcover books or books with plasticized covers, etc. In such cases, proper waste disposal would have taken up to half an hour or more of detailed reading and tough decisions. To make things easier, we then get a supplementary trash bin for GENERAL WASTE where we throw everything that did not meet the specific criteria of other bins, as if, once again, apart from paper trash, plastic trash, and so on, there is trash as such, universal trash."

Keep gorging yourself

Yes because shitposting totally provides constructive criticism and allows me to see that I'm in my own ideological dumpster