So Trump and Clinton are pretty neck and neck. But why is Johnson getting like 10% while Stein is only getting 2%...

The free market will fix it. All hail the invisible hand!

what's the point of tripping if you're gonna post like one sentence?

Most browsers save name info, so it's more effort to delete the trip from the field and then put it back in afterward.

Is there any proof that muh free market, small government is better even within a capitalist frame. I don't know much about bourg economics, but it's pretty clear that social democratic states in Europe and elsewhere have better results while roughly equal gdp per capita, sometimes less. Even within America living standards rose the most between 40s-70s with pretty heavy keyenesean policy and union involvement. And aren't blue states better off than red usually?

Stein's been getting 4-5% from what I've read. Because part of the issue is that a lot of polls have outright excluded her as an option while including Gary Johnson.

Also understand that the Johnson campaign has somewhere around 40 million dollars while the Stein campaign has only 1-2 million dollars. The difference is that Johnson accepts corporate/lobbyist donations while the Greens do not. He has a lot more money to through out ads in the media.

Stein is batshit insane. Look at her proram. Wants to stop "global warming" and shames anyone who has doubts and 3 lines down says she wants to label and maybe even ban muh evolved plants. What happened to muh scientific consensus?

The Greens don't have a lot of visibility or as much money + your average voter is incredibly ignorant and maybe read some Ayn Rand in high school.

...

Red states also have large groid populations.

Cool source friend.