The Biology of Human Attraction, Race, & Status

No. A weak father would have a weak son. Doesn't matter if the mother is a bulldyke. They'll just be degenerate children. Honestly betas hardly ever breed anyway.

But of course polarity is real.

masculine women either want a submissive man or an even more masculine man. not hard. no matter really who and what there is a dominant partner and a willing subordinate.
with regards to a beta father and bitchy mother they will be beta. learned behavioral traits do not pass down genetically.

xenophiles have always been by far the minority in western cultures, for clear and obvious fucking reasons. It's why there's never been any vote on these topics in the first place. The result would be obvious and contrary to the worldwide ethnic cleansing of european genetics that the jews are perpetrating.

What's happening today is not by "choice" or "attraction". In the well known experiment of the monkey and the ladder, where peer pressure is manipulated into an intended change in behavior in future generations, would you claim that monkey not climbing the ladder to get the bananas are doing so by their own choice?

Efeminate males and masculine women are outliers for their respective sexes. They would have a hard time finding each other in traditional communities based on just their respective numbers. If normal males and females find their lessened dimorphism unattractive, then they die childless and unmarried.

The information age gives these outliers the technolog to find one another on furry fansites and antifa organizing boards.

the propaganda worms its way into everything

because a feminine looking man is inherently beta. get past reading comprehension shill and you might have a longer effect than thirty seconds

but if you discuss this you must also discuss that this is based on a lie, the hollyjew nigger alpha buck does not exist in the real world on most measureable physical characteristics niggers do not score higher than european descended people, so even if the media is pushing this fiction and convincing people they will not find there image in the world

also when you are talking about the sexual dimorphism would trait are you discussing, it seems there to be a big differentiation between neoteny faces and effiminate body structures with a preference to babyfaces with an athletic build

Good point, if there were a paper handed out to every citizen in the US

So that's how cheetahs and Kenyans can run so fast, it's just their culture. We'll just ignore bone and muscle density and limb length

First off, I think you're all going about his wrong by framing it as "masculine women" and "feminine men". That just paves the way to the LBGT and gender issues we have today. Instead reframe it as less dominant man, or less submissive woman.

I think it would be a mistake to pair a dominant woman with a less dominant man because that will completely change the home of their children to a matriarchy.

It should instead be that dominant women seek out even more dominant men, and less dominant men should seek out even less dominant women, so that the man always remains the head of household.

That's where we are today, where white women have been encouraged to be dominant, and they naturally seek out more dominant 3rd worlders, and when men encouraged to be less dominant are looking to more submissive 3rd world women. Which is usually a trap anyway.

Fugg, sorry for formatting, but I also forgot to add to

If America had ever been given a paper with a question on that said, would you like whites to become the minority in the US? Yes or No? I'm fairly sure it would have been shot down time and time again.

Even when the 1965 Immigration Act was passed, Kennedy promised it wouldn't change the demographic makeup of the US, and people bought it.

That's a terrible piece of new agey self-help junk, user.

We aren't animals; for those of us that are aware, our biology does not influence our behavior when behavior consists of conscious action.

For those that are not aware, they are susceptible to conditioning and other kikery. There is genetic predisposition influencing the instincts and desires of people that comes from and helps evolution. Kikery abuses this predisposition and thus undermines any benefit there would have been to evolution.

What else is there to talk about? Don't we already know all this. What exactly are you even asking in the OP? You don't need to be a science fag to know this, it's common sense and everyone who's taken the red pill knows this (should include all active posters here).

This ignores an alternative, much more parsimonious hypothesis–ugly women and weak men end up together because they can't attract anyone better. All women prefer strong men (though it's easier to meme women into believing they're attracted to something else, they will always be happiest with a strong man). All straight men prefer feminine women.

Fuuuuck. Kikes know the power of B.F. Skinner and apply Skinnerian behavioral tactics as a basis of their social engineering. This in turn, helps them train the populace to accept the unacceptable.

Case in point: White women protesting against white people, because social norms changed through social pressures to make this acceptable.

Essentially the Jew uses Skinnerian, not fake-kike psychology like (((Freud))), to program the population and move the social Overton window in their favor. Thus, the Jew uses the most powerful method of controlling human behavior, social pressure, to mold normalfag human behavior. With kikes controlling the media, they essentially control the perceived overall conveyor of social pressure: The media. Yet, when the internet came along it destroyed (((their))) monopoly on social pressure and now we see efforts on likes attempting to regain control of the monopoly of social pressure by regulating the internet, banning (((hate speech))) and not providing ad service to sites that are against the (((mainstream narrative.)))

Mind blown, user.

This seems like the thread to ask. What is the science behind eugenic and human genes? I've found just through light research this shit is way more complex than punnet squares and recessive genes.

When you, even as lightly as I've looked into it, see the truth behind these systems it totally kicks apart the leftist "we're all one race, your kids are just gonna be a mix between your skin color and your wife's skin color lol"

That's bullshit anyway, even from a non-scientific view, half-niggers always just look like regular niggers. I've never seen a child that is the product from a male nigger+white woman that has any facial characteristics of his/her mother.

You're doing God's work user, never stop.

While you are correct, there are a lot of other inherited predispositions that provide a lot of inertia, be it physical or psychic.

Here's how I see it
specific genes themselves are still confusing for me, but they seem to interact in such a way that they cancel eachother out and interact in an interesting fashion

...

So far as intelligence goes genes govern the ceiling.

Yes. I always like to say that genes decide the ceiling, and culture decides whether or not you make it there.

I think that's really the long and sure as far as ability goes.

...

How are you defining 'intelligence?'

It's not just half-niggers, racemixed individual often look nothing like either parent and you cuck yourself so hard if you produce a mongrel that a random kid in your street of the same race as you is more genetically related to you than your own children. Really makes you think.

I can confirm this. My mother has said a few times that people have said "user (me) looks so much like his mother", to which I roll my eyes. It's laughable at best, and insulting at worst since they must think that I'm retarded and/or blind.

Feels bad, man.

Guys, I'm sorry to say so to you…but that's only the tip of the iceberg. That started a century ago and has been developed WAY beyond what you would believe if I told you.

There is a whole macro branch of science that was taken "off the records" but developed all around the world.

It was the real epicenter of the cold war, in fact - and was only disclosed very recently (without ANY outlet talking about it).

You don't even imagine how deep…you know that construction is always late, right? This is a saying basically in every advanced nation on the planet. What if I told you the reason is not lazy workers, but rather that they're working on multiple projects?

You should all spend more time in the CIA reading room.

How do I know your IQ is ~115?
If you're actually intelligent colleges slow down your acquisition of knowledge

He said dictate, not encompass. And it's true that gene expression is dictated by epigenetic cues, there is no hardwired path of gene expression. None of this stuff is really on topic but I felt the urge to point it out anyway

Come on mate don't be so cryptic. What's it called?

Share with us user. The Cold War was about who could brainwash children better?

paraphysics.

CIA reading room -> query for Scanate, Sun Streak, Grill Flame, Center Lane or Stargate. They're all the same program, been going on since before 1900.

Now, anons, I'm no supersecret agent. If people like me can find this stuff, there is only one logic conclusion to be drawn: there is at least a faction within the international govt that is pushing for disclosure.

I think there's perhaps two different things in play there. Media has made interracial relationships much less of a taboo, so the people who do naturally have an attraction to other races are going to be more free to act on that. But then there is, like you've said, the people who are superficially attracted to a person because of status. That works for celebrities and rich people, but your average person can't afford to waste time on a superficial relationship. Status isn't everything to most people - even women. Exceptions being narcissists with delusions of grandeur.

Convenience is another factor to consider. A white woman in a mostly white area is not going to ignore all the white men around her and seek out a black man, just because the media said it was cool. She likely wouldn't do that even if she genuinely found black men more attractive. People form relationships within the community they are in. Who has time to wait and search for their ideal? Women certainly don't, biological clock and all that.
"Does he have his shit together? Is he a nice person? Do we have fun and enjoy eachother's company? Does he want to be a father some day, and if so will our kids look really cute? Am I attracted to him and is there chemistry?" This is what the average woman looks for when it comes down to it. Everything else is a "bonus" but not worth wasting one's time holding for, because there is no "perfect" person.

M8…

Sounds kind of retarded, to be honest… What the other fellow had to say, that is. I would lean more towards what you've suggested - status > biology.

Women are innately attracted to males of their own kind, who fulfill a certain role. There are certainly many females who, due largely to cultural variables rather than biological (but certainly I wager some exhibiting aberrant biological symptoms), may be attracted to 'the other' on the grounds of aberrancy as regards selection based on kind, but most are almost-certainly acting in the context of role filled. When it comes to groids, there is - and has been, for decades - variable degrees of indoctrinatory propaganda put out to motivate toward race-mixing, and its continued state (now at an incredible magnitude) and adoption by the masses has created a cultural (environmental) incentive towards such behavior, has created a means via which a groid can fill a given role perhaps better than a White male (specifically, when that role is to be a social signaling device/platform).

Even despite this extreme effort, White/European women remain the least-likely to race-mix, and I wager White/European men are the same - it doesn't hurt that Whites/Europeans are, statistically, the most-appealing phenotype in terms of modern hominids (a fact which the Enemy has worked very hard to re-orient, with minimal success).

Think of it this way…
Imagine we encounter two intelligent alien species, both binary-sex bipeds like ourselves.
The one species resemble White/European humans of optimal physical aesthetic, whilst the other resemble the xenomorph drones from the Alien movies.

The beautiful aliens will fulfill both aspects of what is sought in a mate, at least from the female perspective - innate (biological) attractive and environmental (cultural) role. With the xenomorph race, there's going to be only a minimal percentage of the population who espouse aberrant attractive behaviors (directed towards the xenomorphs) derivative from cultural contexts, and an even smaller percentage which espouse such derivative from biological aberrancy, however, the role filled (which is determined by environmental/cultural factors) is far more variable.

If we assume this is the case, it would explain some of the behaviors we've seen - the few females espousing aberrant mate selection protocols (most derivative from cultural conditions, a small amount from biological conditions) are primarily adopting these practices in search of an Other that can fill a role (namely, at present, a social signaling platform), even despite an absence of biologically-induced attraction. The Enemy has been very successful at altering the cultural landscape to create a role-based incentive for these behaviors, however, they've not yet succeeded in establishing a biologically-derived motive in this context, despite significant effort (and granted, such a process would take far longer than this process has even been on-going, for changing culture is much easier than changing genotype).

If in to be honest I still think the majority of whites hold innate contempt for race mixers even if they're indoctrinated themselves. I guess it's kind of a feeling you adopt from your ancestors. A feeling of disgust at the prospect of lowering your social status to that of a negro.

Regardless of the indoctrination, unless someone had an agenda, there will always be an us and them. Whites view themselves as a group en large. However other races are more racially aware. (Which is why they seek to heighten their blood by having sex and children with whites. This elevates their blood, and lowers the whites blood significantly)

However in the circuit of the hyper trendy left, this is where your minority of race mixers are found. They have a purpose in race mixing. Ironically, they don't do it because they find blacks particularly attractive, but because they want to lower their socio-economic placement to that of the race they mix with to get away from their white privilege. Most of these women find themselves in an endless loop of abuse, and depression. Yet they can't figure out why they have a void, nor why their hair is falling out and they're gaining 30lbs. They feel empty. When they look at their kids they don't see themselves.

from what i've heard this one is among other things about that too

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_Character

yes and no. "brainwashing" is extremely reductive. as is the target "children", in spite of both obviously being primary objectives.
one of the subfields of paraphysics is "parapsychology", though.
It's very hard to explain user, you should follow the path I mentioned in if you want to know more

Bump for importance

Has someone genuine statistical information on interracial marriages & their mongrel offsping (unmarried also) of various countries?

This is the hard part. I tend to only notice negro male/White female pairings, but maybe because I find it the most offensive. But then, on the other hand the Jew doesn't push WM/BF so much since (I'd argue) male attraction is more based on biology than status.
Although the Jew has done a remarkable job making fat asses an object of attraction in the West, but maybe I'm just seeing the impact of changing demographics.
As for hard stats in the West, very hard to come by for obvious reason. A better place to study it in a different context (if you could ever get a grant, you couldn't) would be the Jap women on Okinawa who distinctly tend to seek out either negroes or White males and express their preference by which bars they frequent. Or who seek out neither. Although that's adding another element to it, since Okinawans are the puerto ricans of Japan and already have low status.

Threads like these are like a magnet to tradcon idiots who don't know shit about biology and think their ideology dictates how the world works.

Don't buy the booty meme. I made that mistake myself. It's a Jew trick.

Get me access. I can pass a clearance check. I'm nothing but a big fat thin-file.

Who is stopping you from enlightening everyone then? If you want to bitch, offer an alternative and an explanation.

(checked)
What is this CIA reading room, and how do I get there?

Race and genes do matter, diet-wise is often ignored, most foods nowadays are nutrient deficient due to FDA kikes. The only way to get good nutrition is to supplement it with amino acids like N-Acetyl L-Tyrosine, Acetyl l-carnitine, CDP-choline, L-Tryptophan and buy organic shit from local farms.

It's more complex than dominant/recessive genes : you need to look into epigenetics, ie the factors that influence the ways genes express themselves.

To give you two simple examples :
- An individual who had a parent who cultivated his own muscle mass will find it easier to grow his own muscles as opposed to someone who's parents didn't work out.

- There exists an allele of a gene that, when expressed, induces an increase in IQ of about 10 points, moreso if both strands containt said allele. However, there exists another allele, of another, unrelated gene, that blocks the expression of the first allele, negeting its effect.

How do I activate my +10 IQ boost? Does it involve almonds?

I find this true. My dad was pretty muscular and my body is naturally built well. I don't get fat either.

I found some interesting stuff on how eye color forms over at GEDmatch. Intriguing to see how different genes interact with eachother in determining an eye color, even though the program got it wrong. my eyes aren't brown.

Former biology major here. Full of useless trivia.

Neoteny is having more of a babyish physical nature than an adult form. Chimps look somewhat cute when babied but ass-ugly as adults because they are not neotenous.

Human populations have been selecting for it for a long time, to different degrees. It doesn't necessarily mean less sexual dimorphism since some factors of masculinity are greatly selected for (facial hair, larger bodies, etc). What is likely being selected for is not the boyishness but the social factors - Bieber is appealing to young teens because he looks like one, but is also rich, famous, 'bad boyish' in a faggoty sort of way, and has tons of social approval. Girls at such an age are hard-wired to want high-value males to breed them, and to the female brain the Bieber is the same as an alpha male from all the seeming social approval he portrays.

Put anyone on television with crowds cheering for them, and many people will naturally pay them more deference and attention simply from social approval. Mass media does this - it selects people for adoration or revulsion. And (((whoever))) does the selecting can select anyone for that inbuilt attractive factor - even if they are unmasculine boys, loose women, or revolting specimens.

My observation with interracial is that the vast majority of peoples’ interests with it come from the same root as why people are interested in bestiality - the 'contrast' appeal, and the excitement of debasing yourself socially, physically, etc. Apparently if scat kills the interracial threads, there must be some sub-sections to debasement that tickle different parts of the brain. My guess is that revulsion lies deeper than the social taboo in the brain (which it does - the amygdala originates the sense of fear, hatred, and disgust), and overrides the sexual impulse in all but the most perverted and addled minds as a reflex.

In any case, your tactic seems to touch on just about every facet of disgust-generation at the same time and connects it indelibly with interracial subjects, which is why it is likely so effective: https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgust#Domains_of_disgust

You would be surprised at how much human behavior is based on unconsciously-built habit. It's shortcuts that save us a ton of processing power, but are also great for conditioning people to frame in their thinking in certain ways. Certain good goy ways even.

There is plenty of evidence suggesting that given mate selection isn't tampered with by mitigating factors (like celebrity or social status), 9's pair with 9's and 2's pair with 2's except in rare circumstances. So there is merit to your assertion. And also reasoning why many interracial couples outside the limelight are pretty trashy and ugly looking.

Females are particularly vulnerable to social pressure. The more 'communicative' sex pings constantly around them for affirmation, even moreso than non-beta men, and derive the value of their mate selection by modes of social approval. Females will need social approval to protect and supply them while they breed, and thus they feel intense scrutiny all the time. Perhaps that also leads to the prevalence of social-taboo subjects among their erotica – a safe and pleasurable release from that constant pressure. Jewish families push their sons into becoming respectable positions like doctors or bankers to a ridiculous amount perhaps because they might be seen on the lower-spectrum of attractiveness otherwise.

All real genetics are more advanced than basic Mendelian genetics. Only a few genes discovered actually conform so easily to that. Much complexity in physical structures arises from HOX genes and those that govern hormone balances and feedback cycles - any little tweak there vastly changes physical and behavioral phenotypes. A few tweaks in HOX genes turns wolves into Chihuahuas or Vikings into pussies in just a few hundred years.

Race is more than skin deep. Entire bone structures, hormone balances, IQ and brain structures, and most physical features are going to be different, and thus have different impacts on the kinds of individuals and societies produced from them.

If you come to Holla Forums and do not comprehend the basics of 14 words, you have no place here.

Marry within your race to maintain your genetic advantages and adaptations to your environment. Support traditional family as the only model that has proven to be the closest to being an optimal social structure for humans. Destroy anything and everything that threatens those two basics. Civilization flows from family and continues to thrive as long as families grow.

We have 14 words for a reason, the amount of evidence is beyond dispute, the next step is to actually implement it, starting with your daily life.

The sheer simplicity of these tenets makes it impossible to subvert and makes them near-axiomatic.
next time if you need to check whether X, Y or Z will be harmful, check it against the basic fundamentals - does this hinder or support European race? Does it block our advancement or secures us against future attacks?
nothing else ever mattered, only the language changed.

(cont.)

There is more genetic diversity among African populations than there are among Asians or Europeans. This doesn't mean that the Africans are 'superior' somehow that notion is retarded, merely that their populations were small enough and isolated enough to diverge more than European and Asian stock. European mixed a bit with Neanderthals, and Asians diverged in their own ways as well.

Africa is a tropical continent, and one line of thinking is that hominid populations there wouldn't of had much selection towards forward-thinking (no winter to plan or prepare for) and lots of UV radiation to defend against (dark skin). Northern, rugged, and less-tropical climates like Europe and Asia forced greater planning and preparation in order to survive, and those traits were more selected for. Some even argue the roughness of northern living in Europe in particular selected even more for exploratory tendencies and empathy, which can be backed up with analogues of naked mole rats being either solitary or colonial organisms depending on how tough their environment is.

You will also be more related to one of your 4 grandparents than the others because of the ways chromosomes shuffle about in meiosis.

WM/BF is much rarer probably because black females have much more of a masculine expression in most cases than most white women. But the more sinister reason may be that females are the key to a population's growth. Targeting the women of any group would ruin their population growth prospects in a more permanent way than targeting males.

Genetics greatly influence what kinds of foods are going to be 'healthy' for you. Japanese people will find seaweed highly nutritious in Vitamin B16 simply because their genetics allow them to house special bacteria in their guts that can digest seaweed. For everyone else seaweed will provide you fiber (i.e. indigestible scrubbing for your innards) and little else. The Batton Death March fed the American prisoners the same food that sustained the Japanese soldiers well, and the Americans starved.

It is also why all those fad diets are doomed to failure, because any diet no matter how nutty will work for some people just because their biology happens to be adapted to it. Every person has a unique genetic compliment and gut flora that allows them to process different foods to different extents, and the race of a person greatly influences what foods will be particularly good for them. Lactose is indigestible outside of European stock and a few rare African and Asian tribes because of mutation in the first case and special gut bacteria in the latter cases. Milk therefore is nutritious for European adults but nigh worthless for many others.

Cool. Epigenetics used to be considered mostly the stuff of Lamarck and thus discredited, but I did hear about many concepts like your first point described that do have impacts. Another one was were the stress of the mother during pregnancy caused a permanent increase in cortisol being produced in the fetus throughout its lifetime (apparently to prepare for a stressful environment) and if starvation occurred with the mother to create more fat storage in the fetus (to prepare for lean environments). Perhaps that is why some males from certain populations fawn over their pregnancy women while others don't give as much of a damn - undoubtedly there are even more effects we haven't discovered yet.

Almonds are delicious, but what you're looking for is gene therapy, m8.
From what we know, IQ is one third certainly nurture, one third certainly genetic, and one third could be either/varies.
Like many other innate abilities, you could think of it like like a rubber band : individuals all have different base lengths, and different composition, which influences how far their can stretch (and when they will snap, if pushed too hard).
As far as I understand it, for this gene, you either have that boost, or you don't, but the degree of the boost depends on two things : whether you have both alleles with it (double boost) or just one (smaller boost), and just how much melanin you have (or rather, how much your alleles favor melanin production), with the boost being in inverse proportion.
So, in short a subsaharan african with both alleles will have no boost, a semite (as in dark curly hair, brown skin, dark eyes) may have a little one, a dark-haired green-eyed european an almost full boost, and a blond blue-eyed guy getting the whole benefic.
So cultivate your potential, and don't throw you genetics down the drain.

It may be obvious, but a blond, blue-eyed nordic who doesn't have that allele at all gets nothing from that gene.

cia. gov/library/readingroom/home

there is no requirement for access, just google literally "cia reading room", click the first link (freedom of information act electronic reading room is the real name) and do your queries.
I've been browsing freely from abroad and there's no nothing other than ignorance of the contents that's keeping it from being spread.

Just to mention a few other things in there…the files that wikileaks published shortly ago stating "war in syria was planned in 1968" are in there too.

Not to mention details of all the institution corrupted, infiltrated or founded by the USSR through the years…

How to develop a Big Black Turd fetish: The Post.

cia.gov/library/readingroom/search/site/
click the link, goy:^)

Thanks for sharing, it's people like you who carry the mother of all redpills.
Why former ?

Also, I feel like I should add something : higher IQ isn't by definition a good thing.
While higher IQ means more processing power, and is thus the key to not only understanding the world but also being able to function in civilized society, people with very high IQ are more at risk to devellop mental disorders. My guess is that's because they are able to realize how shit the world is, and feel largely alienated from other people around them.
I once saw an user here say that individuals seem to fare better when surrounded with people withing one standard deviation of their own IQ (15 points), and that is my experience as well. It's probably down to the fact that even when trying to be nice, someone smart will find the dumber person infuriatingly slow, and the dumber one will feel belittled.
Some relationships can survive the strain but it's not easy. I think it's more important for everyone to live in a society of people with similar abilities, so that they don't feel alienated (it's essentially the same thing than what the spartans did with wealth, applied to other domains : making sure the gap within a society doesn't grow too big, as it tends to tear at the social fabric).

wew lad

As a high IQ user, here's some secret sauce: polymatharchives.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-inappropriately-excluded.html

Can be easily disected to the justin bieber line: Justin bieber has been given social status from others for whatever reason and all the boobaniamls pick up on that and from there it is like a virus that spreads.

Doesnt mean that justin bieber would prevail in a group that isnt a big stage but rather an independent environment, and usually from there it is a mixture of various trades that transfers to other people which translates into "status" and that is going to be picked up by boobanimals.

genes are sort of like a camera. you can record different things with it. the different things that can be recorded with it is what genetics does not encompass: the spiritual qualities of man as distinct from the physical qualities (philosophy of mind and body).
one's physical qualities within the context of the rest of the world informs experience, which in turn influences behavior.

Oh I hope you mean algorithms and state.

i mean that which occupies space and that which does not.

that's easy enough, but then you have a ripple effect of males trying imitate and females looking for a similar individual. Look at what the Jews have pushed in the UK with "One Direction." no talent, literally look like half-faggots and every female there is interested (which isn't saying much, look at avg UK female). One muslim rapist claimed that the Brit girl wanted it because eshe said he looked like token muslim from "One Direction."

and who is behind "One Direction?" the Jew Simon Cowell. Who is behind INSYNC? The fat jew homosexual pedophile whose name escapes me. Something changed in society where girls stopped growing out of "boy bands" and they became laughing stocks and now their fame seems to go go on and on. I don't know what it is, but something is different now. No genuine big hollywood actress in 80s would have dated a "boy band" member. Now they do. Something is very different in the way status is rated. I think now it's perfectly acceptable not to "earn" status, whereas in the past there had to at least be that appearance (Scumbag Joe Kennedy's older sons).

Wew, and I thought I was ahead of the game reading into the Clean Break document from 1996, that talked about destabilizing Syria through proxy war.

Good point, I agree, a caste system if you will. Though I think it's the worst situation to be merely above-average. Not smart enough to theorize cool shit, but smart enough to realize the world is is shit and that I really know very little.

Though wouldn't the caste still need to be organized accordingly? Ideally an IQ "chain of command" if you will, since a mid IQ would have better chances of getting along with a lower IQ then just a higher IQ. A buffer if you will.

And how would you say potential should be cultivated?

Here are two examples that come to mind. Highly desirable females with males who have no discernible talent or "real status" in the adult world.

psyc.nott.ac.uk/research/vision/jwp/papers/pentonvoak1999.pdf

Experiment 1 showed that people tend to find their own face, when morphed into the opposite sex, most attractive, even when he/she doesn't know it's their own face, suggesting that people typically prefer those who look like themselves, in other words; their own racial/ethnic group.

Read through these and it'll more than answer most of your questions

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/24570590/

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/24580537/

I dont have the stats but most men do not want like a justin bieber faggot but rather imitate the alphas of their group which also represent a certain social dynamic. Justin bieber is just an outliner being pushed for various reasons by various groups, etc etc.

They dont date "boy band members" because they are soley there for teenage girls and i do not think that any woman past 25 would get wet by that shit, they are tailored to a specific audience.

Status "earned" in a group is mostly done through various mechanisms, usually the males will give you credit for trait/deed xyz may it be intelligence, looks, strength or other traits which will then "Impress" the women, but this isnt totally void of looks. You cant really say that "one direction" (after looking up their pictures) are ugly orcs or quasimodos.

Right picture "highly desirable": You can pick out better looking girls in any club, that is even considering that this picture isnt really favourable to her.

It's an example of women who have both fame and "real status" (as females) and made those choices. People know who they are, perfect photos aren't necessary.

Jesus are you dumb user. "I don't have the stats but I know…" Well, that settles it then.

yeah I'm sure it's just a coincidence goy

Golan heights dispute 1967
cia. gov/library/readingroom/docs/LOC-HAK-184-6-33-5.pdf

Soviets in Syria 1973
cia.gov /library/readingroom/docs/LOC-HAK-187-6-4-4.pdf

Syria, the next step? 1975 (report saying Israel only wants to negotiate their surrender, syrians will not resort to full war and are dependant on US to get concessions from Israel - guess how that turned out)
cia. gov/library/readingroom/docs/LOC-HAK-237-4-3-1.pdf

Syria, Assad and the peace process, 1988 (report textually states: "Syrian conditions for ending the STATE OF WAR WITH ISRAEL include full and unconditional withdrawal from territories occupied in June 1967. In Syria's view, if this condition was met, the state of war could be replaced by an absence of hostilities)
cia. gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP89S01450R000600580001-8.pdf

etc etc etc etc

was reply to

Israel's been at war with Syria, in secret, for decades already before the "ISIS crisis"

I would say most of the time women find men who aren't particularly handsome, attractive and desirable. The caveat is that they're typically masculine and strong, hard worked. So being a pretty boy faggot will only get you so far, you might get some pussy but beyond that…

Not surprised, since I'm one myself.
I'm very lucky to have found people who don't make me want to tear my eyes out when I speak to them.

I was thinking more along the lines of separate, largely autonomous communes/tribes, for one simple reason : while it's good to have geniuses taking care of R&D, social questions like law and cultural mores cannot just be "passed on" to a dumber individual. That, if anything, is the lesson to gather from the wreck that is the west today : we tried to impose a "one size fit all" society on the world's people, and we found that many qite simply cannot function into said society, which is why it only works for people that think like the (((designers))) (intellectual, contempt for the physical, rule-bound, ultra-individualistic etc…).

I've been looking into that for a while, and I've been thinking about making a thread about education and child rearing in general, since I see a lot of people talking about making babies here, but not a lot of talk on the critical part of K-selection : education.
There has been some fascinating research coming out lately about learning techniques, some of which almost lean towards the robotic. I have myself gotten to experience an alternative type of schooling, and it's probably what saved me from becoming another piece of trash on our cultural trashpile.
Do you think there'd be interest in the subject ?

Holy hell. I can't believe you've made a thread of this. I haven't been this happy in a long time, user.

I haven't read through the thread yet, but I'll provide further context. The kind of woman I was referring to is the archetypal variants of a tomboy. That is, women who are less feminine, either because they feature more masculine traits, or they are more neotenous and therefore less swayed by female biology. That is, the more masculine looking women and the women who are very nerdy. Take note that there may be overlap between these types as well.

The very interesting thing is that their preferences in men hearkens genetic sexual attraction; their genes know full well that they are less sexually dimorphic, so they seek males neotenous men who will, in turn, provide them with even less sexually dimorphic children.

Note that neoteny is correlated with increased intelligence (increases the brain size) and more juvenile traits (both in physical terms and in mental ones–for example, the quest for knowledge and curiosity is fundamentally evolved for the capacity to play). Neoteny is probably the strongest K-selected strategy I know of, because the offspring will be more defenseless and will be born with bigger brains, and neurons are very expensive to maintain, much more than muscle.

Here's an interesting video on the topic:
youtube.com/watch?v=81c5doqGh8A

Former only because I graduated in Biology and am now getting an MBA. I enjoyed the subject however, to the point that I view economics and business in similar terms to biology. Both are very similar systems.

To the other point you make, high IQ can be extremely isolating, maybe due to them having a harder time communicating effectively and translating their interests into terms others can appreciate, and the fact that one can better realize that isolation can hurt them even more. In the Allegory of the Cave, the one who was able to see the light of the real world and returned to share his knowledge with the rest was reviled and hated too, so maybe there's more chance for the high IQ individual to be in a similar position.

If a population is to improve, there must be selection against undesirable genes. It doesn't have to be brutal like in nature, just that if those with desirable genes reproduce more frequently and successfully than others the same effect comes about. It's basic husbandry.

It would take toil, many failures, and generations of support, but with clever incentives it could and has created better human beings and societies over time. You could make it direct like banning or inhibiting certain people or (((certain groups))) from breeding on a physical level or very indirect like providing tax relief to married couples who have children responsibly over the unmarried who pop them out. Eugenics was widely accepted as a good thing before WWII, and only after considered super-duper evil because Hitler liked it and all the other goys in the West at the time…

Good.

Yes the media can make even the ugliest nigger attractive to women.

It's harder for them to make ugly females attractive to men though, because what men find attractive has less to do with social status.

I means i didnt look up any stats and i just go with what i observed faggot.

Depends on what you define as strong, physical strength is one component intellecutal capacity, wit etc. is another one.
Being a blunt ogre will also get you so far.

This is exactly wrong. you've been jewed without even knowing. the encyclopedia britannica from 1755 describes the negress as having an ass "like a saddle." you've posted a picture of something a negro would find attractive. you've been negrified without even knowing it.

Reduced sexual dimorphism, from my personal observations, also appears to be a K-selected strategy. It probably isn't as strongly related to K-type reproduction as neoteny, but the thinking is that increasing sexual dimorphism results in gender disparity, therefore promoting a champion type style of reproduction that we see among seals. In humans, we call this behavior "polygamy," one man who has many wives, leaving a large population of males with no one to mate. I believe someone once said that the founding of civilization was made possible because almost all men could start their own family. We see in animals like lemurs that they are almost exclusively monogamous, and show very little sexual dimorphism.

Increased sexual dimorphism is antithetical to pair-bonding type mating because there is no emphasis for the male to help provide resources to the young.

It should be noted that it is surprising that humans are as monogamous as we are, because it is not predicted by our level of sexual dimorphism. Were an alien to visit earth and make predictions about us based on our physiology, they would probably conclude that we are non-monogamous with little male involvement in child-rearing.

So, something is indeed different about humans. This is probably because, during the Ice Age, men needed to hunt for the family group in very harsh conditions, and women needed to have wider hips and curved legs necessary for birthing large-headed infants–something that's very inefficient for movement. It's the same reason why Negroids outrun Europids; they have straighter legs and narrower waists. All this could've put a selective pressure to maintain a degree of sexual dimorphism that's otherwise quite unusual.

This is what Plato said. Basically that people try to balance the male and female, so more masculine women will be best with more feminine men, and masculine men best with feminine women.

so bio/societal norms can be based on "what I think I've observed?"

nice try 13y old user from a small ohio town with only 1 woman your ugly mother

Congrats about the diploma, user.

Oh, I'm completely on board for eugenics : it's the only rational thing to do, and we've always done it, only with limited information.
I've come to think that the most urgent step would be to remove all child benefits, in order to curb the dysgenic growth of genetic dead-ends (look up the rate of inbred morons from pakistani descent in the UK if you want to get your blood pressure up, it's the worst example I know).
Ideally, we'd be able to restrict child benefits to those with good genetic potential, and break down the link between genetic parent and educator in order to raise the maximum amount of high-potential children in the best environment possible (in short, I'm talking about the Lebensborn program, the kids would still have a traditionnal family).

Man, now I feel I should write up a thread about Lebensborn too, I haven't seen it discussed here lately (though I may have missed it).

I dont think there arent any stats how being a justin bieber faggot worked its way through mating preferences with a appropriate context, are there?

This, however, is total BS. Less sexual dimorphism is incredibly degenerate, and pretty much every dead culture in existence became less dimorphic as they declined and died.

Wrong… a bigger ass/hips to waist ration is a sign of estrogen and fertility. It's rather universal.

""Negro," Encyclopedia Britannica (1798)

NEGRO, Homo pelli nigra, a name given to a variety of the human species, who are entirely black, and are found in the Torrid zone, especially in that part of Africa which lies within the tropics. In the complexion of negroes we meet with various shades; but they otherwise differ far from other men in all the features of their face. Round cheeks, high cheek-bones, a forehead somewhat elevated, a short, broad, flat nose, thick lips, small ears, ugliness, and irregularity of shape, characterize their external appearance. The negro women have the loins greatly depressed, and very large buttocks, which give the back the shape of a saddle. Vices the most notorious seem to be the portion of this unhappy race: idleness, treachery, revenge, cruelty, impudence, stealing, lyng, profanity, debauchery, nastiness and intemperance, are said to have extinguished the principles of natural law, and to have reproofs of conscience. They are strangers to every sentiment of compassion, and are an awful example of the corruption of man when left to himself."

Top kek

Fuck off back to reddit you kike loving retard.

ALPHABET SOUP/SHILLS:
omo pelli nigra, a name given to a variety of the human species, who are entirely black, and are found in the chan zone.
In the complexion of alphabetsoup we meet with various shades, but they otherwise differ far from other men in all the features of their face.
The intel women are greatly depressed, and have very large cunts, which give the back the shape of a saddle.

Vices the most notorious seem to be the portion of this unhappy shades: idleness, treachery, revenge, cruelty, impudence, stealing, lyng, profanity, debauchery, nastiness and intemperance, are said to have extinguished the principles of natural law, and to have reproofs of conscience. They are strangers to every sentiment of compassion, and are an awful example of the corruption of man when left to himself."

>>>Holla Forums

Do you want to hear a joke?
Who is the worst emo?
A diamond.

IO Psych PhD here. I work in a big corporation drawing up policy for HR, employee policy, as well as consulting. Despite the bullshit they will politically-correct call IO psych, the reality of it is making workers more accepting of decreasing standards.

In a nutshell, the field is the ultimate fantasy of the robber barons of the early industrial era, and a tool they would've liked to have had to shut those mobs up.

People like me are paid to devise methods based on behaviorism and other "applied science" to make American workers work harder, not give a fuck about ever getting a raise, feeling "part of the team" so they lower their personal boundaries in the workplace into feeling like it's a big daycare where "they have a stake" but really this just puts more responsibility on them.

It's disgusting. I'm just being honest though, because the end goal of "psychology" was always manipulation, and when someone is paying you to do it, they're paying you to increase their power.

At least until Jesus comes back and hires me to make the world fair. (kek)

Hey, user! I'm that very same guy you quoted. Just letting you know I posted in the bread, in case you've missed it by being so busy. Here:

Jesus already came back, the Jews killed him again though.

I observed the same, i even made jokes about until some coworkers told me half seriously to stop it because they would want to use that.

An issue I am noting in this thread is the combination of multiple groups into one category.

1)
Intelligent people tend to seem undeveloped. As a rule, they are developed but do not socially develop until a later age simply because they divert their energy to other efforts.
Take into consideration a woman who does not wear makeup, does not do her hair, and sticks to conservative clothing by our social standard. Or a man who does not work out and does not socialize in a way attractive to women. While genetically the two may be dimorphic, or genetically primed for it, they do not show it socially. However, they still seek dimorphic mates. When turned down, or when finding the mates dull due to a lack of iq, the two tend to end up with each other- or the second type of nondimorphs.

2)
The naturally deficent- people who are not sexually dimorphic outside of social variables.
There are also two categories to this:
natural and extreme.

a)
Extreme: In males, specifically, feminity is often caused by being a 3rd+ son in a family without large gaps in children, because the mother's body develops a resistance to testosterone and deprives the son of it in utero.
In females, I don't know what causes it, but possibly something equivalent. I note there are less butch lesbians in the world than there are effimate men, so I feel like it's more of a rarity that is simply hereditary, and may fall into the latter category.

b)
Normal:
Lastly, the category of natural selection. Males with feminine features, females with masculine features. common in nonaryans, possibly due to environmental conditions enforcing role specialization and conformity
On the topic specifically of chins, certain traits such as chin "strength" are not as dimorphic (although testosterone effects jawline) so occasionally a genetically superior breeding pair may recombine into a inferior child- "he got his mother's chin."
These people don't willingly go for their polar equivalents! This is a significant thing to note. Look, for example, at the chinese man's tastes and dating habits- or the rich man's. Look at the expected traits of a good whore, even. When genetically inferior people have choice, they will still select genetic dimorphism.

What they do go for is "their level", with women having a tendency to under-estimate themselves. Socially unattractive people tend to socialize and reproduce with their own kind, largely due to natural segregation. It's not "their genes" that are aware, as we are discussing a social, concious act- it's them, and their evaluation of their own value.

The biggest issue I see (I will undoubtably be called biased, since this discussion is for people who often fall into category (1), but I believe the logic is solid) is the tendency of (1) and (2b) to lump together. A significant loss of good genes comes from the intelligentia, who are genetically but not socially conforming to dimorphic states.
The ((media)) is largely at fault for this, I wager. In natural conditions, autists/high intelligence would still be selected as mates, since it's easier to blend in socially to your town than to a meta-cutural clique.

For both such males and females it can be attributed to, I think, larger population densities meaning more judgment on first sight. A conservative-dressing woman is seen as not sexually dimorphic, although conservative dress is a sign of submission to gender roles, while a intellectually dominant man is still seen as attractive but never actually interacted with in order for this to be gagued.

Maybe it can be considered a sub-category of dimorphic sexual signaling, a set of signals that the ((media)) has untrained our reading of. Or a concequence of higher population density causing people to rely on visual cues. The issue of genetic loss still stands.

Yeah because it's just like it was in college where every teacher wants to think they are part of the nobility when in reality they're a bitch on a payroll spreadsheet administering trivia tests in the case of "objective facts" (a history test, a biology test, sciences, etc) or compliance tests in the case of liberal arts papers where the person has to dialectically cater to the morality of the present rulers; at least on the micro level of the college teacher, but that is typically on the larger level since a college liberal arts teacher is a coward in the first place who tows the line: the same dumb bitch or faggot English teacher in 2017 telling young white women how horrible it was that interracial sex was punishable in our history would, if suddenly a powerful ruler took over tomorrow with brute force and imposed their morality, would be singing his song for their paycheck, they'd be eagerly asking for the new curriculum books, and studying themselves their new lectures where they must tell those white girls that going near nigger cock is the pinnacle of evil.

I can only laugh after reading Alfred Rosenberg's Myth of the 20th Century, how they were creating a new world where the shcoolteachers – who were always shill employees – were then telling little mentally-malleable boys and girls how repulsive niggers and Jews are, how they were instilling in boys the virtues of Goethe's Faust to not be trivia bitches but men of action that builds character, whereas today they tell our boys how evil their forefathers were, and how they need to support stupid women in the women-supremacist world of "equality"; because we know equality is a lie, and as soon as you make women equal, you've really made them superior.

A comprehensive list below is all of the great creative innovations of women:
….
…
………….

And you know what i also see? Just like the SJW roborellions, i crawl into their minds and then i humiliate them.

Trips For Truth

This research will be very important for the eugenic laws of the future Reich.

I dropped out of politics completely about 15 years ago ancap, it was this realisation that got me back in.

We tell women that the only power can hold is being a deficiant man instead of outlining that women always held power and will always hold power in their very own way.

And that is somehow funny, even if you are the smartest man alive, if some cunt with huge tits walks by and ever so slightly pronounces the amplitude of her bouncing tits you will lose some of your time and energy looking at those tits.
Unlike fags of course since they arent distracted by those flesfruits, that why they are preceived to be dangerous faggots.

All of this shit is only a discussion in a state where women have any rights or "equality"; where women are in the workplace and can earn enough money to survive on their own and scrutinize their mates more, and it follows that men make less money and their power in the market is reduced not only to women competing in labor, but the new perception in women's minds that men are officially equals.

This effectively reduces men in women's minds to nothing more than dildos, and women care less about the intelligent dildo that has solar-charging (an intellectual man) as much as they do the dildo that has 5-star reviews for really working their g-spot and clit (the gym-rat beefcake on roids).

So you get a society where men have all moved from the study to the gym as their spare-hour endeavor. You'd never see the "gym phenomenon", the "bb misc brah zyzz" culture shit prior to women's lib.

A man who competes for women's attention today is nothing other than a transient dildo, and even whether he is "the beta bux" (has money, she'll fuck him as little as possible and maximize his use as an ATM), or the "alpha fux" (the dildo that hits the g-spot, he has some sort of shit she considers charisma, some sway, other women want him, it can be as simple as looks and masculinity tailoring), she'll still get bored of both, she'll still move onto the next dildo when that alpha fux is "had", when that beta bux is "exhausted" or she decides to use the state to legally rob him.

Nobody wants to be lonely though, man nor woman, but man today thinks he needs to be the highest-rated dildo, whether he consciously or unconsciously knows it.

SO!

You get:
- tattoos everywhere
- beards everywhere
- muh motorcycle vrroom vroom
- hey brah lets go to the gym, hey I spent a ton of time figuring out my macros, got some creatine.

How many hours of men's lives today are wasted on this fucking shit?

We used to just be clean-shaven or bearded by choice, not because we gave a fuck what women thought, we didn't need these base animal crutches, we had the power of civilized man, of rank, that would make these stupid cunts cook our dinner and suck our cocks regardless of any appearance factor.

Now, all that we have left are this new degenerate "new dandy" male, a complete faggot, dull-minded, who will get to the end of his life with an instagram full of him failing to impress whores with his yet-another-6-pack photo, that he starved and took drugs for, and his whole life, his mental horizons likely went as far as trying to remember the youtube video tips on how to appease his jew boss for a raise.

The Jews have really done a number on us.

Physical culture was around long before that you dumb faggot.

Greatness is if i make that fucking valcano torch my enemies not my post.

Or you join me and my fellow robwaifu masterace

I'm not denying physical beauty wasn't a factor. I'm stating that in a state of "equality", it's THE ONLY factor.

*robowaifu

Fake tits were a bad idea even on "biosluts" (i really love that word).
If i ever visit murica i have to figure out how to politely ask if their bioslutbodies havent been modified by the silicone jew.

The point of the fake boobs on fembots is for your body (muh dik) to recognize it as a female and thus being attracted to it.

Well if in burgerland you can probably get by saying

Good goy, screw nature!

On (1), It appears we differ on the core principle in question: morphological distinctions of intelligence. I infer that when you say things like "intelligent people are developed genetically, just not socially," you assert that there is no significant correlation between neotenous morphology and intelligence. While we keep in mind that we're dealing in correlations–that not all highly intelligent people will exhibit neotenous morphology–it does indeed appear that neoteny is linked to intelligence when applied at a broader scale. Look at pic related and think on the deep future of human evolution.

Think not just 10,000 years ago, think back to the first proto-humans. You know how ugly and depressing this character on the right looks? In the deep future, our descendants might look upon us in the same way.

Christcuck or LARPagan?

oh, sorry, didn't see at first. I guess it did end up being an interesting topic to post on. If academia had been different, wonder what it would have been like to stay and get a doctorate. they'd probably have found me hanged in a lab somewhere. It's a good field of study and probably one of the last frontiers since actually studying it properly not allowed by (((certain people))).

I dont like fake tits and i imediatelly delete it if they somehow they managed their way to my harddrive when i was too inexperienced to recognize them as such, and noone on this planet has a bigger big natural tit memory like i do.

Is all you can do to weasel out of your own cowardice is to try and derail the thread into something about religion? Do you know where that quote even came from?

Modern western man: a nigger in white skin.

I'm really not trained in any of this. I just can't help but be fascinated by some of it.

Well, I was off on the date but I had the quote correct. and now they've normalized it to where White women strive for this. Asses with and a lower back "the shape of a saddle" has never been a European aspect of beauty. It's negroization.

Polygamy is a different kind of mating strategy, and in some species there are multiple kinds. Monogamy is one, while 'sneaky bastard' is another it's actually a term in biology - and a form of cuckolding. But minor differences in hormones can create monogamy or polygamy, as was observed among voles. So there may be some merit to what you are saying, but I think humans are simply adaptable to many different environments wherein politically-speaking it is easier to control a horde of males if most have someone or something to fuck on a regular basis.

Thanks. I think there are many methods of selection and means to selection. I'm a fan of self-selection, such as a simple one like this: You offer people at a certain age a lump of money and a life lived tax-free on the conditions that a) they haven't reproduced and b) they will get sterilized. We all know of a certain kind of short-sighted greedy sort that would leap at the chance, and their bloodlines would end right there while the more forward-thinking and dutiful would continue to breed. But it is a bit too simple and would affect more than the targets in mind, but the spirit of self-selection I think is a good way to go. I suppose Lebensborn may have been somewhat similar, but I know nothing about it.

Ah, I was wondering where all this, "We're just a big FAMILY here!" garbage came from. You can use your knowledge and talents to make actual good in the world though, so there's that.

Yes, and European women strove to eliminate the ass altogether and take on the aspect of a flower. Or some kind of cake. Pic related.

Well i d argue that if intelligence is a trait that could equalize the lack of proper muscular development, id really hope the hordes of idiots that will be born tomorrow will squash this kind of evolutionary blight with vengance. I m glad it will.

But then again, if you look at breeding patterns today it highly favours common strategies and that also doesnt pronounce intelligence in the way you preceive it.
You would probably just have to look at some very basic stats to determine if and how intellgence procreates, i would argue that highly intelligent men with certain physiological traits are highly favoured over equally intelligent men looking like dick suckers since their impetus would easily lead them to a lot of fertile women whereas the other "controlgroup" would barely manage to get a decent errection to delecious flatchests.

There should be a logo with uncle sam:
I want to you to breed for the
SAAA, Sperg and autism association.
Or at the very least you could use that for AAA: Against all androgens for the vile feminists.

No, nor do I care. But judging from said quote would modern medicine not be going against "the iron will of nature"? Besides you're not going to change my opinion on that matter by accusations of being Jewish.

If it turns out to be shit, it's not like things can get any worse

Fertility and virtue
The valcano and the vacant
The funny thing i can imagine that there are some spergs that can program all that sophisticated programs that the fat lesbians present to the normies while at same time tyrone throws his dick into a cunt like he throws a ball into a fixed circle fixated on a fixed height.
Really makes you think.

I have to head off now, but I'll come back and do a thread on the Lebensborn, it was the Reich's network of nurseries, the heart of their eugenic effort, and it was fucking fascinating.
They litteraly had everything worked out : every consequence of NS ideology covered, allowing for some sexual freedom in the youth, security for the mothers, good stable families for the kids and so on.
I quite litterally fell off my chair the first time I realized the full scale of what the program was.

That's the queen of France in formal wear. You can find similar dresses at events like the opening of Vienna Opera today. What makes me realize I'm no longer in a White nation are people commenting that "Taylor Swift is ugly because she has no ass." I don't even think she's that cute, a pretty typical Pennsylvania prom queen type, but I don't "get" the entire kardashian/fat ass thing that's been injected into society like poison.

Western women are nothing but an albatross and a parasite. An intelligent man would never be happy in a relationship with them.

You have to look at this way, little boys look up to asses grown men look down on tits.

Swarm of white knights incoming

nigger lovers

wut, I'm robot fucker

You have to know how they operate, doesnt mean you have to pick out some monkey but if you do not want to be cucked you better know your shit.

If i get my coins together i will make a reddit account and then i will do some real butt raping.

This must be checked!

I bet you'd love that, seeing as you're a massive faggot

Never mind I'm the faggot as i clearly have no reading comprehension

Just so you know that quote was a Jewish ruse to radicalize the peasantry.

I will be such a massive faggot that their whole platform will just be a gaping black hole just to be filled with my dick and my little sperm soldiers will be more fertile even through the astronomical propability to impregnate via social hawking radition than all of what they ever wrote.

Good luck on your glorious quest then, down reddit in a ocean of virtual cum.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torches_of_Freedom

If these are masters, i m a god.
And all their shit fills my anger, like a gasoline that has an infinite supply. They think they can learn it by reading books and by some lectures and by some presentations, it is in our blood and in theirs is only shit.
Bias, hindsight bias, foresight bias, bias bias, fallacy fallacy. I should make a little rap. Or a little children song, old mc bias had a little farm, old mc bias had a little farm.

...

But i do, for you every old grandma is a potential fighter pilot etc. pretty basic shit.

You know what the most amusing thing about goyim is? That they put their trust in firms like fanny mae or freddy mac, lookheed martin or lloyd etc. they sound like absolute and utter retards and yet some people put all their hopes into names that sound like utter garbage.

"hey goy i caught a job at freddy mac, mean the name alone sounds like some god made a sick joke about being happy that my employer sounds like a 19th century incest uncle, yet i put all my lifeforces in serving that uncle." Sounds like some really uplifting shit.

lurk moar

The murican goyim serve shitcans like freddie mac, the name alone is repulsive yet the somehow think that someone with that name has some merit. I mean i would give him merit in fucking in fucking his niece but… ?!?!

Looks like a non sequitor to me. I fail to see the link between the mother lacking secual dimorphism and lack of sexuak dimorphism benefitting the child. If sexual dimorphism is benefucil then it will be selected for by both sexually dimorphous and nonsexually dimorphous women, and vice versa.

I was completely thrown off since the Jews have apparently literally invented a new language of biology in past few years. "Sexual dimorphism" is the jewish equivalent of "selecting for masculine/feminine traits" in Jewspeak without offending queers.

What source do you have for it being jewish ? As far as I know, it's a charateristic of a group, not a way of selecting mates.

Sexual dimorphism means that you belong to a population group where there are significant physical differences between males and females beyond the reproductive organs, such as muscle mass, face shape, ability to grow beards, long hair… (secondary sexual characteristics) and behavior.

Europeans have (I think) the highest rate of sexual dimophism on the planet, as opposed to asians (largely no beards for the men, and their can easily grow very long hair) and blacks (less differences between male and female faces, higher testosterone in females).

Also, the traits that are typically male or female vary with the species : larger size is usually seen in males, but in hyenas, it's the opposite.
Check out the wikipedia page on it, it's not shit as far as I could see

Because it's not Jewish, sexual dimorphism is just a characteristic of a species, namely that if a species is very sexual dimorphic, then there's a lot of difference between males and females in that species.

Yeah, that's what I thought, I guess it was just a case of that guy seeing DA JOOS everywhere.
I kinda miss the amount of bullying people used to get here for unsourced claims during and shortly after the Exodus.

I know what the term means. It was never used outside of zoology. It was described in terms of gender-specific selection in humans. More androgenic or less. Maybe it's the mormons influencing the universities…

Interesting! I personally thought Negroids were the most sexually dimorphic, as the males tend to be learn and have a very straight spine, whereas the women are almost always thick around the ass and waist to the point where it's very unattractive. I'm looking more at the skeletal structure, musculature, and fat distribution than their bald heads.

But European men do tend to have the archetypal masculine look, and have much more body hair with regard to women of their races than do other races. Things like pic related seem to characterize the more masculine/ontogenous elements of European men (more so than XYZ masculine man pulled from a beauty magazine). I don't see many other races with this look.

lean*
Can't believe I fucked that up so soon in the post.

Fair enough, was inappropriate. But it's about as appropriate as accusations of jewery because we disagree on technology.

If dubs, he was the first messiah.

reduced sexual dimorphism/neoteny in men in r selection.

r selection occurs absent competitive threats. sexual dimorphism is about bulking up.making the male more robust for surviving such threats. female does not bulk amain/get robust as she is utilizing the male through monogamy hence no selection for it. absent monogamy i.e. r selection, the female must bulk up/become more robust, thus reducing sexual dimorphism.

reduced sexual dimorphism is hyena's

youtube.com/watch?v=icx5TucPZpw

The jury is still out as to whether sexual dimorphism can be linked to mating strategy. If it does turn out that reduced sexual dimorphism is linked to monogamy, then reduced sexual dimorphism is quite likely on the K-type end of the spectrum since monogamy is.

From en . wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogamy_in_animals#Sexual_dimorphism_2

However…

Also of note,

This could account for why we're so unusually sexually dimorphic. Selective pressures outweighing a convenient evolutionary slider.

Those digits

Whoops, non-thumbnal

a very antisemitic one.

plus he killed more jews than you'll ever do.

...

Jesus, Encyclopedia Britannica laid down the fucking bantz there.

Our ancestors were strong as fuck. Even more recently, Romans were reputed to run 20 miles a day carrying more than a hundred pounds of armor and weapons. Did I mention they were like 5'2"? lmao

Exactly. Take away their women, or the hope of potentially getting a woman, and society collapses. Exceptions to the rule are Islam, which is polygamous, but this only works when they are in a constant state of external jihad and can take slave brides. As soon as their expansion slows, they collapse in on themselves

web.archive.org/web/20130318171346/http://www.cchrint.org/psychdrugdangers/TheChemicalImbalanceMyth.html

Pharma bullshit guide.

CCHR is a Scientology front group. It's there to convince people to give up on medicine and join their fucking insane cult.

were you 69890b?

The natural consequence of decay, decadence, and modernity.

Yes

That was a TMZ lie.

Are there any advantages to being mixed race? I understand the hybrid vigor thing has been debunked, but surely there's something interesting going on when two regionally/ancestrally distinct sets of genes are combined? I ask as a mixed asian/white that's always bummed out I'm not one or the other

You can play the mixed race card with leftists as long as you look the part. Also, maybe, you're the outlier who actually does have whatever the best qualities of both groups are. Sadly then, the odds of your kids maintaining that is low (i.e. you would've lucked out yourself doesn't gaurentee your kids).
This is, at least in part, why this mixing shit is frowned upon here. Even if one doesn't believe in an overall superior race, the mixing destroys any perfectness a race attained for its particular environment.

The kids part is the scariest thought. I'm probably closer to the "lucky" end of the spectrum, 6'2", taller than either of my parents, pretty sharp in math, school, whatever. Basically, is there any way to make sure my kids will be tall, smart, not pussy faggots? Is it just about finding the tallest wife that's not retarded and then giving a solid NatSoc education and being around for my kids? How much direct influence can go into a kid's outcome?

Truth? Wait for CISPR (or however it's spelt), which wont be perfect/commercialized in our life time (i.e. outta luck in the "gaurenteed" department"). Finding the tallest wife/not retarted doesn't gaurentee anything. Remember, this is a principle of averages, thus you have to take into account her lineage and your own (i.e. two tall parents can produce a short child, to brunettes can produce a red head if it existed somewhere down the line). At minimum you might be able to gaurentee the NatSoc edu, but oh wait, you'll be forced to send your child to the indoctrination camp called school. In truth, direct influence is more than enough to determine your kids outcome, however, you are (unless you homeschool) forced to put your child into a place where you influence is not only undermined but stated to be wrong.
One thing I'd say, regardless of whether you were a leftist, natsoc, right, etc., is that if your kid asks why, be willing to answer that descending chain of whys. If it lands you at "biological imperative" or something, then that's it, however, build up your child's understanding of your belief system such that it is not only consistent, but is complete up to a known set of axioms.

Please do, would be extremely interested in this.

I wonder if these populations include slavs who were born to post-WWII mothers? Would explain a lot.

HAHAHAHAHA

Yea when talking about attraction, the pornojew and hollywood/ MTVjew have just as much effect as genetics. MTV ruined like %20 of women right off the bat and that has zero to do with genetics..

Your theory has no basis in human biology. That is all there is to it. Women have been selected, just do the math, to prefer strong masculine men; when one man takes 10 wives that choice goes down the line for generations, even if they remain monogamous both male and female for the next 20 generations, whenever such an act occurs it bears large results. Women can not breed with multiple men. This process continues.
All this says is that you need to keep your woman in line.
Never listen to what women say. They all want to be dominated. Thinking anything else is retarded.
When stupid teenagers are taught to act feminine to attract teenager girls, they pave the way to a life of misery and of course the girls continue dating older guys because they crave manliness. Few guys date older women no matter what age range of males you sample.

the religion of the PC SJW
get yourself a textbook and do some light reading

he isnt correct though
"epigenetics" is a catch all term in non scientific circles and while it specifically refers to environmental changes on genetics in the true definition of the word you should remind yourself that the environment you persist in is entirely genetically decided - that is why some pajeets go to the holy river and some try desperately to fit into western countries

There is no nature versus nurture. It is all nature AND nurture. A self feedback mechanism.
You have genes that predispose you to being able to digest milk, you eat more dairy, this causes you to get good amounts of protein and minerals, this helps you brain stay strong - it also opens the way to eating meat because an all cheese and eggs diet can get boring - and your cows dont live forever.
Really, this nature vs nurture lie needs to stop being propagated on Holla Forums if you want to be taken seriously on debates of genetics and the favorite topic, intelligence.

Tell me this, because I'm legitimately curious.

Can one overcome their predispositions by recognizing them and living in a certain way so they don't activate? Anxiety, for example.

hes right, he just gave it to you in a logical format

yes this is true
anxiety has causes, a lot of them mental and the cycles of though you repeat

You're overthinking a very simple phenomenon. Here, let me break it down for you, so you can save your gene talk to create cat girls:

simple as that. Everything else is art talk.

Yes, though literally changing your nature is no small task. Indeed it's the task of entire clans if not the entire volk. As you exert your will and learn to master and dominate your mindspace and body you will write into your DNA the habitual emotions and mental patterns. You can also evolve/active your DNA through application of spiritual exercises, epigenetics and all that. What you need to do is to embody the highest form able and then to keep pushing that. Do not settle on any plane, always challenge yourself.

This is why selective breeding and mixing, even with muggles of your own race is looked down upon. As your offspring will have psychic outbreeding and less coherence in ancestral magical tendencies.

For anxiety specifically (or any other emotional states) transmute them. When they arrise, do not focus upon them (thus feeding them) instead shift your focus unto something else (literally anything else will do, but if you have a target focal object it can help create a habit breaking habit). It's about directing the energy and predisposed energy pathway(s). If you want more insight into it check out this book:
amazon.com/Mind-Brain-Neuroplasticity-Power-Mental/dp/0060988479

Posting my esoteric wizard advancement chart, I see.

Reminder that women can't even do pregnancy right and use it as an excuse to become morbidly obese.
instagram.com/p/-DAmUqJb5f/

...

Makes sense. I have a strong big ass Jaw and chin and "masculine face" and I only love petite, tiny girls, even overly petite

Just a lazy meme from Dunham/Schumer types and/or venomously jealous non-whites who have enough consciousness to recognize how she (Swift) is perceived, but are left in a state of confusion because the same media that made Taylor an icon, is also telling them that men are actually secretly attracted to unkept slobs like them.

While this might work in the short term, your employers (and you) are setting yourselves up for enormous blowback when the workers inevitably realize they've been had. The fire rises. Enjoy the fire and the ovens.
Bernie Sanders is the least of your worries.

similarly interesting

Circassians, Syrians, and Nubians were the three primary races of females who were sold as sex slaves in the Ottoman Empire. Circassian girls were described as fair, light-skinned and were frequently enslaved by Crimean Tatars then sold to Ottomans. They were the most expensive, reaching up to 500 pounds sterling and the most popular with the Turks. Second in popularity were Syrian girls, with their dark eyes, dark hair, and light brown skin, and came largely from coastal regions in Anatolia. Their price could reach up to 30 pounds sterling. They were described as having "good figures when young". Nubian girls were the cheapest and least popular, fetching up to 20 pounds sterling.[6]

The Moors ruled in North Africa and in most of the Iberian Peninsula for several centuries, and the Umayyad Arab aristocracy ruled all the way from Damascus to Spain.[29] Ibn Hazm, the polymath, mentions that many of the Caliphs in the Umayyad Caliphate and the Caliphate of Córdoba were blond and had light eyes.[30] Ibn Hazm mentions that he preferred blondes, and notes that there was much interest in blondes in al-Andalus amongst the rulers and regular Muslims:

All the Caliphs of the Banu Marwan (God have mercy on their souls!), and especially the sons of al-Nasir, were without variation or exception disposed by nature to prefer blondes. I have myself seen them, and known others who had seen their forebears, from the days of al-Nasir's reign down to the present day; every one of them has been fair-haired, taking after their mothers, so that this has become a hereditary trait with them; all but Sulaiman al-Zafir (God have mercy on him!), whom I remember to have had black ringlets and a black beard. As for al-Nasir and al-Hakam al-Mustansir (may God be pleased with them!), I have been informed by my late father, the vizier, as well as by others, that both of them were blond and blue-eyed. The same is true of Hisham al-Mu'aiyad, Muhammad al-Mahdi, and `Abd al-Rahman al-Murtada (may God be merciful to them all!); I saw them myself many times, and had the honour of being received by them, and I remarked that they all had fair hair and blue eyes.[31]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors

Muslims prized blonde women for their harems; and so enslaved Slavic women were purchased in the bazaars of the Crimean Caliphate. In Muslim Spain, an annual tribute of 100 Visigothic [blonde] women was required from Spain's Cantabrian coast.

For decades, 100 virgins per year were required by the Muslim rulers of Spain from the conquered population. The tribute was only stopped when the Spaniards began fighting back – Jihad: Islam's 1,300 Year War Against Western Civilisation

americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html

Bump

Guys I have a terrible situation, normally I would never bring blogfaggotry of a personal nature here but this is driving me insane.

Polish/German ancestry here, however born in America. I met a wonderful girl at college and we went out for a few weeks, we like a lot of the same things and it quickly escalated romantically. Normally this might seem like a good thing, but I went to meet her parents recently and…

They are all Jews, I don't know how I fucking missed this. What do I do?

Are they converts? That's common. If they don't have matrilineal line then they're just faking it until they make it. After 3 generations jews aren't allowd to question lineage. A lot of people buy their way in or jew fathers will pay the rabbi to overlook that the mother is a shiksa.

Just read Robert Wright's "The Moral Animal".

let it go

do any of them look like jews?

No, it's real. It's no great loss, find a picture of her without makeup. But young, impressionable girls see this and they become coal burners. If the west survives another 20 years, more and more we're going to see White females in Europe marrying Muslims and in the ZOG marrying Mexicans. We've lost…we now have a hostile elite, made up of Jews and their camp followers who punish their own for any show of aggression against invaders. Meanwhile, invaders who rape our women/kill us do a few years in a jail where they are among their own kind, and can return and be welcomed back into their communities. any of us would be isolated.

Most of the genetic details are meaningless IMO in terms of analyzing our current situation. Dr. Macdonald and "Occidental Observer" do a very good job of analyzing it from an evolutionary biology perspective and in-group/out-groups. We're in massive fucking trouble in the West. And the elite don't care since they're in their own bubble and go between NYC-London-Dubai-Malibu and don't have to experience any of the ill-effects.

...

change it 'we've lost up to now' and it's pretty realistic. Luckily there are plenty of areas where coalburning is rare and still relatively untolerated. A lot of this shit is generational. We have to fix things by force just so our grandkids will have a brighter future.

Dream bigger. Also, coal burner is a relatively small phenomenon among whites if you look at the statistics. Self respecting whites women don't fuck niggers. Hundreds of years of ingrained disgust overrides media. The ones who do race mix, you'll note, usually are from the bottom of our gene pool. That doesn't make it right, or the amount of race mixers preferable, but it's not as bad as you think.

I don't think media will continue as it has, they had just short of 100 years to build something pretty fucked up by controlling a very narrow band of content creation with a wide audience. They lost that with the internet. You can't make the next generation choke on your shit the same way. Have you tried going back to tv or radio in the past 5 years it's garbage, then you remember it was always garbage in fact this might be better than the garbage it was before. Now if your shit sucks, if you feel even a bit disconcerted by some weird fucked up message mixed in whatever their are billions of other content creators.
Which brings it to the adaptation of the plan, control aggregation. That's why people pay to own Reddit, YouTube, Chan's, twitter. Ultimatly it is to block content pushing messages the owner doesn't want while providing more eyes to content driving a message the owner wants. Content creators have been cheapened by this, came up recently during that PewDiePie thing, but his content has roughly 10 times the audience of the Washington Post. What does he get for that, couple million maybe doubt more than 8 digits yearly, the Kardashians probably spend more than his net worth on makeup with maybe half the audience. You don't make heroes/role models out of a devaluing product. Meanwhile the aggregator Google is sitting on more money than a decent number of countries. Aggregation will devalue too in time, technology advances and while money encourages a direction it ultimatly does not listen to anyone.

Where I live that is absolutely true though in the last 15 years it has become more acceptable for otherwise decent girls to do it. When I go to cities though there is a shitload of miscegenation going on. Luckily, they mostly stay near the nigger parts of the city.

When I say generational I mean the way we are still suffering from people who were directly indoctrinated with feminism and shit in the 70s. It will be the children of the ones born after DOTR who are thoroughly free of the mental taint.

>Meanwhile the aggregatoradvertiser Google is sitting on more money than a decent number of countries.
That shit will crash hard at some point, it's one thing to buy and sell info and eyeballs, but another to be worth more than the products and agencies that are using you.

You know what needs to be done.

...

and they've already put in laws making it illegal to criticize Jews in every nation in the West, with the UK just added. The US was one election away from a Court that would have validated "hate speech" and in all honesty I don't trust Roberts or the current nominee either.

Think about how fucking insane that is. we have laws in the West where you can be jailed for criticizing one and only one ethnic group. And we tolerate it.Recently people in UK and Cucknadia have been V&ed for naming the Jew.

Considering just how much of the infrastructure is tied up in just a handful of companies, they don't even need the laws to enforce their will. We're seeing hundreds of books disappearing because amazon was the only selling a lot of them.

But as search engines memory hole "problematic" sites, vpns hand over right wing user data, ISPs work hand in glove with the KGB soup agencies, and places like ebay and amazon blanket ban selling anything that rubs against the narrative, we'll be in a very hard spot.

Russia is one hundred percent on board with this shit too, Australia will likely follow suit with the commonwealth, and the next time we lose an election the first amendment dies in burgerland. It'll be white eastern europe as the last hold out, soon enough. And we all know what happens to white holdouts.

I have a lot of David Irving's books, but not all, too expensive. As soon as he dies, his daughters are going to sell out his estate to Jews or the copies will be confiscated by the state. Look at the book "200 Years Together." 15 years now and we can't get a translation from the Russian.

our social problems and yours are very very different for the foreseeable future

Check'em bro. Even your dubs tell you what to do.

You are guaranteed to be absorbed into their shitfest and your kids to be liberalized as soon as they come out of her womb. Don't do it to yourself.

It's all in the open.

Fuggg :—-DDDDD

Women have a natural protective instinct for their own. When they don't have stability they will make it for themselves.

This "competition" meme between the sexes needs to die. The female herd instinct is overlooked solely as a weakness. Truthfully, they can mobilize in ways that men cannot. They will go back to normal once society is re balanced, but right now they're attempting to maximize their chances for success, whether they know it or not. Because of this, they succeed in a litigious society with no social mores and that makes them miserable, it means society has failed.

Women don't take chances unless they're convinced.

To be fair I think a lot of the propaganda about nigger runners is horseshit to give leftist more opportunity to flood sports with niggers & disenfranchise whites.

yes

thanks for sliding

Who cares about attraction. Women are subhuman children. They'll do exactly what a man wants sexually when he's paying her, but then they'll give their boyfriend excuses or a subpar performance.

The day women fell for the Jewish "women's lib" was the day they conceded their idiocy to the world in the sentiment: I'll be more submissive to a corporate boss than the so-called man I married and love.

Women killed marriage, not men.

Before the amazon business someone here posted (even like 2-3 months ago) that we should beware because a silent purge is happening online and material is getting removed.

DO you know anything about this? What did he mean?

Men
Gangbang
Trannies
Over
Women

Islam is the religion for you.

hi sinead

Pre-Jewish-Materialistic Western civilization, our views on women were a lot closer to Islam's than today's. We're an anomaly. Unless you're historically ignorant, from antiquity to not very long ago, women were considered lesser than men in logical faculties, politics, critical thinking, etc. Women had their place, but it wasn't in governing, justice, keeping orderly and healthy societies.

It took industrialization, globalization, and the conversion of religious ideals from what the West previously had (Catholics, Protestants, what have you, they were true religions with ideal figures just the preceding Pagan polytheists), into a world where the priests are Hollywood celebrities and news media, the "new biblical stories" are Hollywood movies and TV shows of materialistic Tony Stark bullshit, globalist materialistic decadence, rootless to the core.

And God is the dollar, which will make your slave caste white daughters fuck niggers on camera, which will make your slave caste white sons work to the bone and own absolutely nothing, while Harvey the Jew films your white daughters getting blacked.

Yeah? The fact that it's allowed to exist and go unpunished, and you can do nothing about it but stick your head in the sand and say "not my daghter" (then you aren't a true racist, because every fellow white means more to you than any Jew or nigger, every fellow white is a representative of your race who you must look out for, a representative of Europe that you should not want to sully your race by such acts), with all of that said, from a historical perspective, it all proves that whites in their own lands are SLAVES.

Fucking slaves. Millennial whites are slaves to the Jews. Your daughters are fucktoys for niggers and Jews, a continuation of the red menace circa 1945 Berlin, only now they ruin the currency and job market, and your sons, your fathers, they're slaves too, who own nothing, but payments, on their cars, on their homes, on their loans, on their coveted credit score.

SLAVES!

I'm very surprised and disappointed that no one in this thread has proposed that a portion of sexual dimorphism is a result of men being attracted to younger and more fertile females, and thus women who stay monogamous are selected who carry youthful features further into old age. These features include light skin, hairlessness, higher pitched voices, shorter stature (more neotonous body), more neotonous faces.

Whenever I see a woman who is around 5'5" with a man 6" taller than her, I always assume there is latent pedophilial desire there, and the clan they hail from was probably one to marry off women in their early teens or younger.
I imagine families whose females are substantially shorter than their males (like mine males=6 feet, females=5' 7-8") have strong pedophilial attractions, like I do.

==NO ONE== wants to admit this taboo, but it's the elephant in the room: sexual dimorphism in humans is due to the most desirable "girl" to take as a mate being a girl in her early teen years.

Even under that suposition, making it social norm./legal at the present time would be suicidal. It would validate/remove all refutes against the invaders taking the youthful girls and using them. Such a society, as was once had, can only be had once all invaders no longer exist in our mindst. In addition, one would need the sentiment of not mixing to be large (unless you want Tyrone to be fucking your 14 year old daughter instead of a white guy, hopefully, dating her until she is 16 or 17 to get married and have kids).
It'll be difficult, especially if you wish to remove traitors, for even once you remove the invaders and, hopefully, garner an anti-mix sentiment, one would still have to remove a lot of women who have defiled themselves. In the worst case, one will be left with an entire generation of men who would have to forsake companionship so that the next generation may have its proper mates (i.e., you, as a 30 year old don't take the 14 year old who would be better off with the about to be 18 year old guy).

bump