Websites reporting Capcoms 'secret e3 announcement' for their 'hardcore audience targeting 2016 line up' is not in fact...

The archive is a novel idea. Dont give clicks to anybody and put money in the journos pocket.

Trouble is goons and their current "call everything template and spam doubles till everyone gives up and leaves the thread" tactic is relying on EVERY site being archived being declared "shilling" which again leads to many Patrick Bateman images.

A 15 minute QTE fest in the start followed by punching rocks onto a giga trex head

So you fuck over your own thread by giving in to goons, nice one OP. A faggot as always

Nice try there schlomo

Archive or bust is the key here, right after webm or bust

Is it wrong to say that Resi 6 was actually pretty good? I found it fun.

I didn't even bother playing through 6. It was such a chore. Shooting shit felt like ass because the weapons didn't have any weight to them. The controls were floaty as fuck, too. I liked Leon's first level, but that was pretty much it. Had they stuck to that instead of "WWIII but with zombies" it would have been somewhat entertaining.

At least in 5 you could go to war against niggers.

DEEP GAMEPLAY
DIFFICULTY LEVELS THAT DON'T SIMPLY RAISE ATTACK AND HEALTH
REPLAY VALUE
EXTRA WEAPONS/NEW GAME+
CHALLENGING PUZZLES

GOD DAMN IT CAPCOM GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER

Yes. You're objectively wrong and a faggot.

Don't be, remember.

B movie plot with intentonally bad va.

Wew ok then lad.

Uh huh. Giving you goons, because lets face it you are pretty transparent, any website to use as an excuse "is key" got it.

God you really think you guys are master tacticians dont you.

...

Re6 was never a back to roots.

If only REmake 2 would actually be worth it.

I doubt it, but I recently replayed 1-4 and REmake, and the thing that the first game especially has is building up bosses at least in Jill campaign.

Before you fight snek, you have to try and save people from snekbite, before fightan Plant you can try and weaken it, there's build up and suspense throughout the game. Even 2 lacks in that aspect, it shows too much while 3 is just a Nemesis game and 4 is a clusterfuck.

Resi 6 has some of the best mechanics of any RE

yet somehow it remains the least fun. I don't quite know how thats possible

They where spouting that lie since Re5

It's what's been done since Holla Forums immigration. Who gives a fuck about goons and just report them if needed. Cause it's a fucking obvious d/c tactic.

You're fooling no one, Goidberg. You made a thread, it's here and people are discussing, now leave and lurk.

They said it would, but it didn't.

Exactly.

You are objectively wrong, like a biodrone suggesting dragon age 2 is good you must be blinded by brand loyalty or you have lowered your standards to normalfag levels.

This is in the first 4 minutes. SCARY RIGHT? ARENT YOU SCARED NOW??

Resident Evil 6 was a homonculus mongoloid creature made of 4 alpha builds of half made games frankensteined together.

If you genuinely think its good you need to reevaluate what your standards have become.

I've never played a Resident Evil game after RE 3, is it worth it?

Code Veronica is decent, RE4 is a very good game but not RE, more like a toned down DMC.

Basically during 4 they threw out the old RE formula for action shooters where you can take on an army of 'zombies' that also drop ammo.

4 was actually decent and had good atmosphere, but 5 was a HUGE step down from it. I never played 6.

I'd agree
I'm one of the few fans who actually liked Outbreak. It was the multiplayer resident evil game I wanted. Too bad AI is shit and online is long gone.

the first act of 4 is when its parasite controlled spanish hillbillys INNAWOODS, but it shits the bed after with set pieces like running from a giant robot midget statue down a one way path in a castle designed to be destroyed by said midget that apparently is designed to destroy the castle as you leave.

Its corny action movie dialogue and the regenerators are the only redeeming factors for the last 3 quarters which are honestly pretty shitty. But at the time they were a new and refreshing gameplay built around the shitty stuff.

If you are going in expecting the natural evolution of nemesis stick with Code Veronica or just go play silent hill 1-3 instead.

4 is a masterpiece. Code Veronica is great, after that is kind of meh.

Thanks, I've watched a friend play a little of 4 quite a while ago and it seems it might be a little too action-y for me. I'm not really into third person shooters

This just reaks of resident evil.

Best thing 4 had for me was the interactivity you don't often see with console games, such as shooting a fish and you got a fish, even if nowhere told you you can shoot and eat fish.

RE 4 is the only good RE game.

I liked how the midgets right hand comes off though

...

outside of one boss fight all the enemies move like snails, the rest of the action sequences are mashable QTEs.

then again, the castle does get to rambo levels of silly

Not really, it reeks of people not understanding what made the early games work and misinterpreting it instead.

The early games had a ridiculously obtuse undertone. Like the mayor and police chief taking bribes from umbrella to rebuild downtown raccoon with fucking puzzles and hidden keys all around town. That was silly, but functional in a movie kind of way.

In RE4 at some point the Los Illuminados had the idea that a guy LEAVING the castle needed a giant robot midget of salazar to chase them out at a speed that could not catch an unathletic teenage girl with a limp that brought down all the main support pillars in the process.
They made that, set it up and years later as leons leaving they go 'now its time to shine!' and bring their own roof down on their heads as leon leaves unscathed and they blocked the only way after him.

Thats not silly or obtuse. Thats fucking clownshoes.

Lmao look at this pleb, I bet you dont even put death rooms full of lava and fire in your castle

No shit, sherlock. Glad you figured it out on your own.

You forgot the giant castlevania clockwork wheels that move a little welcome mat platform across said indoor lava lakes.

And dragon parapets and towers hanging from chains leading to a giant treasure chest.

I was referring more to the puzzles than the story.

If only they used Dino Crisis for that instead.

What might have been.

Actual good porn of Jill Valentine

MEANWHILE DURING RESI 4'S DEVELOPMENT

No such thing will ever exist because Jill a shit.

I might trigger Holla Forums but i found the lack of sheva porn disturbing.

That booty was 10/10 too.

Yeah, that was horrible, Dino Crissi 2 proved it was better for an action oriented game but they as usual only cared about RE and maybe fighting games.

And then you have Parasite Eve…

...

Dino Crisis 3

imagine how much better humanity would be if this never existed

So they hired all the stuff that Kojima discarded for being useless?. Lmao

Pixie cut, short skirt tube top Jill again? Cause that's the jill that ever mattered.

Seeing as how its so different from the rest of the series I can see why some plebs fellow anons might think that.

Parasite Eve 2 was OKish for what's worth, 3BD was Kingdom Hearts with Aya Brea.

Resident Evil with Dinosaurs in Space?

Palyed 1 recently. Will never get sarcastic and confident female lead again.

But its true, tank controls did not play well in RE 1. RE 4 did it perfectly.

b-b-b-b-b-but user! that's just a man with boobs!!

What are you talking about ? I just want a sequel to Dino Crisis 2.

HOLY SHI-
Welp.

Maybe they didnt want to make movies?

/ara/ looking Jill best Jill. Those fucking funbags i swear.

I really really like PE2, but its still a clone of RE compared to the originals modern day vagrant story style.

I don't recall MGSV being a movie, it barely had any cutscenes.

Just 800 credits sequences to sit through.

I know, it played well though and the plot wasn't raped by a Nomura fanboy and the lack of care for renewing the license.

Then maybe the ones fired were the staff that liked to make movies… or Hayter fans.

Where's the source?

So?. You could skip them.

Hideo pls, stop trawling Holla Forums for Ludis reactions. And stop posting all those bbw threads you burger loving westaboo.

what if.

wait

what if they
they

what if they introduce

wait

what if its

what

if

three player co-op

what if they had four player co-op, and you could fight specialized zombambos along the way, and the enemy spawns are randomized

Amazing news OP!

YOU ABSOLUTE MAD MAN.

Seriously though i expect single player supernatural universe reboot with the mercenaries as paid dlc multiplayer.

with map packs, obviously.

The original game and the remake being great even now would have a word with your plebness.

Hes probably what would have been flagged as underage a few years ago.

People used to modern games put less thought into games design because games are all designed the same way. Super Bunnyhop has some video where he lists like a dozen third person shooters from the last 3 years that have identical controls and button layouts. People dont think about design because they dont have to.

Looking back anyone with a lifetime of vidya experience dating back to the 90's or earlier can look at Resident Evil and see the fixed cameras were a way to mask loading what at the time was extensive details -even if it was pre rendered visuals in most cases- and the tank controls ensured continued directional movement that would be uninterrupted by sudden, drastic camera angle changes.

Look at silent hill downcoming to see two games that try fixed cameras at points and switching between them has your character spin and often go back the way you came because they dont understand free movement and fixed camera shifts dont work together.

But he intended them to be episodic, right?

Why is it so hard for Capcom to make a new survival horror series with a different setting/new monsters? RE has been milked to death and zombies in general are cliche as fuck. At this point I'd even rather see a Dino Crisis sequel.

Fun Fact: After REmake had a lukewarm reaction at launch they announced they were going to "take inspiration from Final Fantasy (which was still a top tier respected ip pre decade of lightning at the time) and each future RE game would be a different universe with some recurring elements and only the titular theme of horror in an urban enviroment would remain constant".

I imagined maybe one time you get serial killers like clock tower, another something supernatural like fatal frame and maybe something completely new taking the 'biohazard' idea in a more realistic approach.

But then they got the idea for RE4 after the positive reactions to RE3's action oriented shift and the rest is history.

so its going to be a bland open world with little to no content

Do you mean it will be a Third Person Action Adventure with Stealth Elements game?

i think i want it.

...

I guess the rational is they cant be worse than the RE6 team?

They could totally do that, and still call it Resident Evil. That's pretty much what they did for RE4.

P.T. Without Kojima and Del toro is completely pointless.

I guess at least they could bank on the technical prowess of the people that made the Fox Engine, but even then I doubt they'd make them do a whole new engine all over again.

It's cool, but meh.

I wanna someday see RE game where you play as random citizens (kinda like outbreak), but you have the whole raccoon city area & outskirts to explore and the game has heavy randomization of events, enemies and items.

Basically player versus monster where the game lasts for set amount of time, until the missile strike wipes everything out, and the players have to get out before that.

Ideally you want to play the match from the start, though you can also join in mid game too, but your chances of surviving are gimped because things get progressively worse in the city and most of the supplies might have been picked up already.

When the game starts, you are thrown into random location/situation as random character. Your primary goal is to just get out of the city, but some characters could have bonus objectives too. Depending on how well you do could change the ending scene and give you bonus points to spend on shit.

I WANT IT TO BE TRUE BUT IT IS VERY UNLIKELY

...

What's your point here user, they've been milking that game since release and trying to make every subsequent entry after it Resident Evil 4-2

Missread, thought you where talking about the original RE's.

Thread theme

...

>there will be three lanes

The only way to save the RE franchise is to dump any and all attempts at storyline they had going on and ask the people that made The Evil Within to remake their game with RE characters

This is some fucking spooky ambient shit right here

But 4 completely dumped traditional zombies for new monsters, and they could do that again. Infact, I think Revelations did that, though I never played past the demo.

Revalatons was mostly deep sea shit.

I don't see any problem with traditional zombies. REmake is amazing and I still play it every year.

I found Revelations boring, even though it's what people wanted again, RE with spooky shit.

The dick wants what the dick wants

I remember when RE3 was coming out and a buddy of mine told me he finished the demo and it took place during the initial outbreak, so you'd run into a ton of normal people as the plague was just spreading.
There was a Romero remake that involved a mall which covered the initial outbreak as well. Fear the Walking Dead did something similar, but it got focused on the camp really quickly. Last of Us prior to the time-skip did this very well. I never got to play RE Outbreak for the PS2, so I'm not sure what that covered.

I wish we could have a survival game that only covered the initial outbreak, so you'd run into a ton of people that were still alive. Fear and treachery would be the main themes as everyone tries to get out. It would take elements from the thing where you weren't sure who was infected, so a friendly could turn at the worst moment and murder your group if you weren't careful. Members of your group could get lost as well, so you'd have to juggle going back to save them and pressing forward, but that could cause the rest of the group to turn on you. It could star multiple people in different parts of life, so you'd be able to start the game as different characters. However, you would be stuck to the chosen character for the playthrough, but your actions could affect different playthroughs or they could just be entirely separate.
It would take place over a day or a week and use night and day mechanics. The number of non-infected would plummet rapidly as time went by and the bigger your group, the harder it would be to keep them all alive. The larger groups would also be able to hold more ammo, medicine, food and water too.

That sounds fun,

I'll criticise a lot of the last of us for being a dull repetitive walk and talk game, albiet with fantastic outdoor scenery. But i honestly think that opening is the best opening in a videogame in a long long time.

Trouble is being dont want a game in a chaotic beginning of things going to shit. They want the post apocalyptic scenario because of some low tier beta power jerk of fantasy where theres no rules "so i can get revenge on everyone" or some other low level pleb fantasy.

I'll always say dawn of the dead is better than day of the dead just for the first act where the news reporters are still arguing as shits going full LA riots and swat teams are dealing with them, but failing.

Her sadpanda tag remains lacking however.

the two RE: Outbreak games are probably the best RE games before 4.

Needs a dog and horse edit like this →

Honestly a PSN/XBL/PC HD rerelease of outbreak files 1 and 2 would probably be really popular.

I mean shit theres generations of people under like 25 that dont even know the ps2 HAD online games.

user he asked what you expected not what was never ever going to happen.

As long as they don't add voice chat, it would ruin the game considering the feeling of isolation between the players is what made it so good.