How did the god of war and death become Santa Clause, or the honorable daddy figure like in Ausatru's pussy version?

...

Because then you should really leave Holla Forums, filthy jew worshipper, and massive hypocrite, as it is a religion specifically tailored for subhuman niggers of all the persuasions.

my.mixtape.moe/vnvrmc.txt

Fuck off Holla Forums, we've all seen those infographs you share and spam here. Nobody gives a fuck, get better at shilling.

Both paganism and christianity are shit.
The christians belong to a theologically nonsensical nihilistic blood cult.
And pagans don't actually believe in their dead 'religion' and just use it to counter-signal christians.

We don't need shitty faith based fables in a racialistic nationalist worldview.

While you raise some valid points (especially against the wiccatru and the SJWatru who draw up constitutions before followers) the idea that:

Is bullshit and will always be bullshit. Valhalla is a distant 3rd and your honest white family is more valuable then almost anything.

By larping as one of us

The hanged one will find us all, I figure if odin is such an unrelenting badass he can stick up for himself. (and totally not a semen sucking front for a shapeshifter betrayer in our midst, because that totally is something we want to gloss over and is in no way relevant to our actions here).

GO AWAY TO YOUR DEATH CHOMO part 2

Seriously the info graphs are legit. You will see.

Actual Odinists don't have to fucking talk about what they do.

People seem to forget that half of the valiant dead went to Freya's hall. How many even read the old tales and study the runes?

You're not living in the way of Odin. You may be a Heathen, but not of Odin's warrior killer elite.

This is your God now.

what kind of metal does odin listen to?

Why are you namefagging? Also why are you acting like being a heathen is being part of a super sekrit club?

Odin isn't the All-father, Tyr is. Dyaus Pter = Sky Father = Zeus = Jupiter = Tyr = Tiwaz = Tues = Deus. It's also the generic Germanic noun for "god" (Odin is called Hangatyr, literally "god of the hanged").

Consider also the linguistic similarity of Tacitus' Tuisto in Germania said to be the divine progenitor of the Germanic peoples. Most neopaganism around these circles amount to ancestor worship anyway.

yfw Odin is an Asiatic imposter :^)

I like the kitty.

Christians truly do follow blindly where Jews tell them to march.

He was in viking times. He replaced Tyr. Tyr even became his son.

Tyr is older and Southern. Godin is Western traveler from the East (an Aryan invader). But Odin is also in the King line of Scottland/Great Britain as Wotan

I interpret as "self-sacrifice" to become something greater.

Where have I heard this before?

Poor confused heretics.
Anyone here seriously aligning themselves with pre-Germano-Catholic "volk" religions obviously dont know much of anything they are talking about.
Human sacrifice, rarer in european paganism but nonetheless prevalent, has always been present for stupid, childish reasons like "muh harvest"
You people need to read more than inforgraphics and ragnar redbeard if you want to enter any discussion against Christianity.
You hypocrites don't realise that Jesus, as the lamb, destroyed the eternally recurring ignorance practised by all preceding cultures of human sacrifice.
If you people spent five minutes reading Rene Girard you would understand this.
It's called mimetic/scapegoat theory.
A society would sacrifice a scapegoat that would bring on a cathartic renewal of social bonds and renewed hope. In so doing, the sacrificed victim would be deified after the fact of sacrifice. It was the resounding moral empathy with the victim that, anthropologically speaking, can be said to be the birth of culture and social ethics. In fact, many thinkers have gone on to say that it was the center of hominisation itself.
Are we still following along, lowly heretics?

But it was Christ Jesus, God's very own living Theodicy, that showed that human sacrifice was not a sound way to appease the gods of the forest (pagan idiots) but simply what it was: blood and violence.
Through his undying love for his creation, God sent his only Son to live the entirety of human pessimism, see their ritualstic stupidity (through observation of the jews, and other pagans by proxy) and, in making the ultimate sacrifice, himself, showed us that the way to appease God is not through silly baby poo poo pants rituals but through Agape: a very specific form of love (the greeks had 4 words for love).
Everything worthy from pagan religion was absorbed in Catholicism as it was seen to have been inspired by the absolute Logos without their being conscious of the fact. Everything else was scrapped and seen for what it was, a product of incomplete human reason and the work of Satan the deceiver.
It's time to grow up, boys.
You simply can't handle what Catholicism teaches because you are too weak to accept a dogma.
Why abstain when you can wank to anime?
Why love thy neighbour when you can cheat someone for personal gain?
Why live in faith when you can use "reason" to understand everything (that's working out well right guys! Yay for Dawkins!)

Pagans do not have a conception of history, the gods are not intended to be "real", they are thought forms, meant to turn history into myth

Paganism is reflective of a culture that lived for the future, not for the past

Dubs confirm tossing aside your ego is for cucks

Retard Aryans invaded

MODS ARE KIKES

youtube.com/watch?v=FFm_4E5WiQE

The norse took their most vile criminals and hung them as a sacrifice to the gods, but I'm sure you would just pull more pasta out your ass to accommodate for that fact as well

those were sent to the bog tho, no need to apotheosize human trash

sacred-texts.com/pag/frazer/gb02403.htm

“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.”
J.R.R Tolkien - Fellowship of the Ring

Even though Gandalf was supposed to be an Odinic figure, his self-sacrifice in Moria was more reminiscent of Christ than Odin tbh

That was usually homosexuals faggot. Also no culture is going to be doing sacrifices everyday for their whole lives, it's impractical as fuck all. Also it seems christians didn't seem too picky about putting people through living hell.

kek

...

:
Book 01 Genesis

001:001 In the beginning Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) created the heaven and the earth.

001:002 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was
upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) moved upon
the face of the waters.

001:003 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) said, Let there be light: and there was light.

001:004 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) saw the light, that it was good: and Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) divided the
light from the darkness.

001:005 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) called the light Day, and the darkness he called
Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

001:006 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the
waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

001:007 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) made the firmament, and divided the waters which were
under the firmament from the waters which were above the
firmament: and it was so.

001:008 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the
morning were the second day.

001:009 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered
together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it
was so.

001:010 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together
of the waters called he Seas: and Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) saw that it was good.

001:011 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb
yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his
kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

001:012 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed
after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in
itself, after his kind: and Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) saw that it was good.

001:013 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

001:014 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the
heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for
signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

001:015 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to
give light upon the earth: and it was so.

001:016 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) made two great lights; the greater light to rule the
day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars
also.

001:017 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light
upon the earth,

001:018 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the
light from the darkness: and Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) saw that it was good.

001:019 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

001:020 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving
creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth
in the open firmament of heaven.

001:021 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) created great whales, and every living creature that
moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their
kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) saw that
it was good.

001:022 And Yahweh ( A jewish name! ) blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and
fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the
earth.
life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are
written in this book.

022:020 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly.
Amen. Even so, come, Lord Yeshua.

022:021 The grace of our Lord Yeshua the Messiah be with you all. Amen.

<

I'm sorry, dude, that I am not as great as a kike worshipper and kike god fearer and a kike god knee bender and a kike god offered hatless penis bearer so it can be seen more clearly by your jewish kike deity which you cannot stop fearing and worshiping and serving even for a femtosecond because you simply love kike mythology and religion so much.

Varg pls, you're not get away from it by pussy-footing the issue. Frazer's citation comes directly from Norse mythological material. According to the saga, King Aun of Sweden sacrificed nine of his sons in his own stead. It's obvious it's not just "criminals" that were sacrificed.

The Ynglinga Saga:
sacred-texts.com/neu/heim/02ynglga.htm

crtl+f Odin
crtl+f sacrifice

Slaughtered his sons at Odin's shrine –
Slaughtered his sons with cruel knife,
To get from Odin length of life.

Yeah sure sounds like it was acceptable for him to do so doesn't it?

No duh, Frazer's interpretation of the saga relates to a ritual slaying of the king, putting aside the farcical premise that killing his sons literally prolonged his life, Frazer interpreted is as a sloughing of responsibility onto a scapegoat.

Christianity is a universalist religion. A christian, by definition, cannot be redpilled because your jewish deity's own words tell you to ignore race and other basics facts of reality

jesus, this is really getting sad

Let me set about making the matter clear. There is one broad fact about the relations of Christianity and Paganism which is so simple that many will smile at it, but which is so important that all moderns forget it. The primary fact about Christianity and Paganism is that one came after the other. Mr. Lowes Dickinson speaks of them as if they were parallel ideals –even speaks as if Paganism were the newer of the two, and the more fitted for a new age. He suggests that the Pagan ideal will be the ultimate good of man; but if that is so, we must at least ask with more curiosity than he allows for, why it was that man actually found his ultimate good on earth under the stars, and threw it away again. It is this extraordinary enigma to which I propose to attempt an answer.

There is only one thing in the modern world that has been face to face with Paganism; there is only one thing in the modern world which in that sense knows anything about Paganism: and that is Christianity. That fact is really the weak point in the whole of that hedonistic neo-Paganism of which I have spoken. All that genuinely remains of the ancient hymns or the ancient dances of Europe, all that has honestly come to us from the festivals of Phoebus or Pan, is to be found in the festivals of the Christian Church. If any one wants to hold the end of a chain which really goes back to the heathen mysteries, he had better take hold of a festoon of flowers at Easter or a string of sausages at Christmas. Everything else in the modern world is of Christian origin, even everything that seems most anti-Christian. The French Revolution is of Christian origin. The newspaper is of Christian origin. The anarchists are of Christian origin. Physical science is of Christian origin. The attack on Christianity is of Christian origin. There is one thing, and one thing only, in existence at the present day which can in any sense accurately be said to be of pagan origin, and that is Christianity.

The real difference between Paganism and Christianity is perfectly summed up in the difference between the pagan, or natural, virtues, and those three virtues of Christianity which the Church of Rome calls virtues of grace. The pagan, or rational, virtues are such things as justice and temperance, and Christianity has adopted them. The three mystical virtues which Christianity has not adopted, but invented, are faith, hope, and charity. Now much easy and foolish Christian rhetoric could easily be poured out upon those three words, but I desire to confine myself to the two facts which are evident about them. The first evident fact (in marked contrast to the delusion of the dancing pagan)–the first evident fact, I say, is that the pagan virtues, such as justice and temperance, are the sad virtues, and that the mystical virtues of faith, hope, and charity are the gay and exuberant virtues. And the second evident fact, which is even more evident, is the fact that the pagan virtues are the reasonable virtues, and that the Christian virtues of faith, hope, and charity are in their essence as unreasonable as they can be.

As the word "unreasonable" is open to misunderstanding, the matter may be more accurately put by saying that each one of these Christian or mystical virtues involves a paradox in its own nature, and that this is not true of any of the typically pagan or rationalist virtues. Justice consists in finding out a certain thing due to a certain man and giving it to him. Temperance consists in finding out the proper limit of a particular indulgence and adhering to that. But charity means pardoning what is unpardonable, or it is no virtue at all. Hope means hoping when things are hopeless, or it is no virtue at all. And faith means believing the incredible, or it is no virtue at all.

It is somewhat amusing, indeed, to notice the difference between the fate of these three paradoxes in the fashion of the modern mind. Charity is a fashionable virtue in our time; it is lit up by the gigantic firelight of Dickens. Hope is a fashionable virtue to-day; our attention has been arrested for it by the sudden and silver trumpet of Stevenson. But faith is unfashionable, and it is customary on every side to cast against it the fact that it is a paradox. Everybody mockingly repeats the famous childish definition that faith is "the power of believing that which we know to be untrue." Yet it is not one atom more paradoxical than hope or charity. Charity is the power of defending that which we know to be indefensible. Hope is the power of being cheerful in circumstances which we know to be desperate. It is true that there is a state of hope which belongs to bright prospects and the morning; but that is not the virtue of hope. The virtue of hope exists only in earthquake and, eclipse. It is true that there is a thing crudely called charity, which means charity to the deserving poor; but charity to the deserving is not charity at all, but justice. It is the undeserving who require it, and the ideal either does not exist at all, or exists wholly for them. For practical purposes it is at the hopeless moment that we require the hopeful man, and the virtue either does not exist at all, or begins to exist at that moment. Exactly at the instant when hope ceases to be reasonable it begins to be useful. Now the old pagan world went perfectly straightforward until it discovered that going straightforward is an enormous mistake. It was nobly and beautifully reasonable, and discovered in its death-pang this lasting and valuable truth, a heritage for the ages, that reasonableness will not do. The pagan age was truly an Eden or golden age, in this essential sense, that it is not to be recovered. And it is not to be recovered in this sense again that, while we are certainly jollier than the pagans, and much more right than the pagans, there is not one of us who can, by the utmost stretch of energy, be so sensible as the pagans. That naked innocence of the intellect cannot be recovered by any man after Christianity; and for this excellent reason, that every man after Christianity knows it to be misleading. Let me take an example, the first that occurs to the mind, of this impossible plainness in the pagan point of view. The greatest tribute to Christianity in the modern world is Tennyson's "Ulysses." The poet reads into the story of Ulysses the conception of an incurable desire to wander. But the real Ulysses does not desire to wander at all. He desires to get home. He displays his heroic and unconquerable qualities in resisting the misfortunes which baulk him; but that is all. There is no love of adventure for its own sake; that is a Christian product. There is no love of Penelope for her own sake; that is a Christian product. Everything in that old world would appear to have been clean and obvious. A good man was a good man; a bad man was a bad man. For this reason they had no charity; for charity is a reverent agnosticism towards the complexity of the soul. For this reason they had no such thing as the art of fiction, the novel; for the novel is a creation of the mystical idea of charity. For them a pleasant landscape was pleasant, and an unpleasant landscape unpleasant. Hence they had no idea of romance; for romance consists in thinking a thing more delightful because it is dangerous; it is a Christian idea. In a word, we cannot reconstruct or even imagine the beautiful and astonishing pagan world. It was a world in which common sense was really common.

My general meaning touching the three virtues of which I have spoken will now, I hope, be sufficiently clear. They are all three paradoxical, they are all three practical, and they are all three paradoxical because they are practical. it is the stress of ultimate need, and a terrible knowledge of things as they are, which led men to set up these riddles, and to die for them. Whatever may be the meaning of the contradiction, it is the fact that the only kind of hope that is of any use in a battle is a hope that denies arithmetic. Whatever may be the meaning of the contradiction, it is the fact that the only kind of charity which any weak spirit wants, or which any generous spirit feels, is the charity which forgives the sins that are like scarlet. Whatever may be the meaning of faith, it must always mean a certainty about something we cannot prove. Thus, for instance, we believe by faith in the existence of other people.

But there is another Christian virtue, a virtue far more obviously and historically connected with Christianity, which will illustrate even better the connection between paradox and practical necessity. This virtue cannot be questioned in its capacity as a historical symbol; certainly Mr. Lowes Dickinson will not question it. It has been the boast of hundreds of the champions of Christianity. It has been the taunt of hundreds of the opponents of Christianity. It is, in essence, the basis of Mr. Lowes Dickinson's whole distinction between Christianity and Paganism. I mean, of course, the virtue of humility. I admit, of course, most readily, that a great deal of false Eastern humility (that is, of strictly ascetic humility) mixed itself with the main stream of European Christianity. We must not forget that when we speak of Christianity we are speaking of a whole continent for about a thousand years. But of this virtue even more than of the other three, I would maintain the general proposition adopted above. Civilization discovered Christian humility for the same urgent reason that it discovered faith and charity–that is, because Christian civilization had to discover it or die.

The great psychological discovery of Paganism, which turned it into Christianity, can be expressed with some accuracy in one phrase. The pagan set out, with admirable sense, to enjoy himself. By the end of his civilization he had discovered that a man cannot enjoy himself and continue to enjoy anything else. Mr. Lowes Dickinson has pointed out in words too excellent to need any further elucidation, the absurd shallowness of those who imagine that the pagan enjoyed himself only in a materialistic sense. Of course, he enjoyed himself, not only intellectually even, he enjoyed himself morally, he enjoyed himself spiritually. But it was himself that he was enjoying; on the face of it, a very natural thing to do. Now, the psychological discovery is merely this, that whereas it had been supposed that the fullest possible enjoyment is to be found by extending our ego to infinity, the truth is that the fullest possible enjoyment is to be found by reducing our ego to zero.

Humility is the thing which is for ever renewing the earth and the stars. It is humility, and not duty, which preserves the stars from wrong, from the unpardonable wrong of casual resignation; it is through humility that the most ancient heavens for us are fresh and strong. The curse that came before history has laid on us all a tendency to be weary of wonders. If we saw the sun for the first time it would be the most fearful and beautiful of meteors. Now that we see it for the hundredth time we call it, in the hideous and blasphemous phrase of Wordsworth, "the light of common day." We are inclined to increase our claims. We are inclined to demand six suns, to demand a blue sun, to demand a green sun. Humility is perpetually putting us back in the primal darkness. There all light is lightning, startling and instantaneous. Until we understand that original dark, in which we have neither sight nor expectation, we can give no hearty and childlike praise to the splendid sensationalism of things. The terms "pessimism" and "optimism," like most modern terms, are unmeaning. But if they can be used in any vague sense as meaning something, we may say that in this great fact pessimism is the very basis of optimism. The man who destroys himself creates the universe. To the humble man, and to the humble man alone, the sun is really a sun; to the humble man, and to the humble man alone, the sea is really a sea. When he looks at all the faces in the street, he does not only realize that men are alive, he realizes with a dramatic pleasure that they are not dead.

...

From eariler in the saga:
18. OF DOMALD, VISBUR'S SON.

Domald took the heritage after his father Visbur, and ruled over
the land. As in his time there was great famine and distress,
the Swedes made great offerings of sacrifice at Upsal. The first
autumn they sacrificed oxen, but the succeeding season was not
improved thereby. The following autumn they sacrificed men, but
the succeeding year was rather worse. The third autumn, when the
offer of sacrifices should begin, a great multitude of Swedes
came to Upsal; and now the chiefs held consultations with each
other, and all agreed that the times of scarcity were on account
of their king Domald, and they resolved to offer him for good
seasons, and to assault and kill him, and sprinkle the stalle of
the gods with his blood. And they did so. Thjodolf tells of
this: –

"It has happened oft ere now,
That foeman's weapon has laid low
The crowned head, where battle plain,
Was miry red with the blood-rain.
But Domald dies by bloody arms,
Raised not by foes in war's alarms –
Raised by his Swedish liegemen's hand,
To bring good seasons to the land."

47. OLAF THE TREE-FELLER'S DEATH.

There were a great many people who fled the country from Sweden,
on account of King Ivar; and when they heard that King Olaf had
got good lands in Vermeland, so great a number came there to him
that the land could not support them. Then there came dear times
and famine, which they ascribed to their king; as the Swedes used
always to reckon good or bad crops for or against their kings.
The Swedes took it amiss that Olaf was sparing in his sacrifices,
and believed the dear times must proceed from this cause. The
Swedes therefore gathered together troops, made an expedition
against King Olaf, surrounded his house and burnt him in it,
giving him to Odin as a sacrifice for good crops. This happened
at the Venner lake. Thus tells Thjodolf of it: –

"The temple wolf, by the lake shores,
The corpse of Olaf now devours.
The clearer of the forests died
At Odin's shrine by the lake side.
The glowing flames stripped to the skin
The royal robes from the Swedes' king.
Thus Olaf, famed in days of yore,
Vanished from earth at Venner's shore."