Femfreq, of all sources, made a decent Emma Goldman vid

what the fuck are you smo-
oh it's just Holla Forums

That's a lot of makeup for one man

WTF I LOVE FEMINIST FREQUENCY AND ANTI SARIKISSKASKAN NOW!

don't really hate her, don't really like her. She seems like such a boring person to be around. I mean I'd rather spend my time reading das Kapital for the 9th time than having a conversation with her.

QUICK Holla Forums WE HAVE TO LIKE THE VIDEOS, LET'S SHOW THESE RACIST woman hater BIGOTS THE POWER OF INTERNET LEFTISTS

regardless of the actual quality of the video I will say it's bad because it's made by someone I dont like

FUCK OFF BROCIALIST

Anita Sarkeesian is a literal con artist and there's no way in hell I'm giving this charlatan more attention.

FUCK OFF WOMAN HATER BIGOT

hey, that's pretty good. I'm a little disturbed by the Jewish music in the background but hey, Goldman was Jewish.

Nobody cares, Holla Forums. She's an internet nobody.

Every times.

fpbp

We already have this thread here
but for good measure here's the webm version.

Holla Forums, you ARE identity politics

Oddly enough, there's no explicit mention of her opposition to capitalism and property relations. Still, it might encourage people to go to her wikipedia page and check her out; maybe even read something by her. That's not a bad thing.

Makes me wonder what liberals are doing putting their clammy fingers on proper anarchists, though. Guess they can't touch commies because they're still the anti-liberal Other.

I'm breddy sure Anita is a literal capitalist. She's certainly friends with some, given how she was sponsored by Intel and invited to Google on her grounds of fighting harassment or getting more women into tech or something…

Wait that's Anita Shekelstian.

Because it's less edgy to claim anarchists who didn't do much revolutioning or rebellion, like Goldman and Oscar Wilde, than it is to claim Marxist-Whateverists who killed gorgillions.

sage

Except she leaves out how Goldman was explicitly not a feminist and makes it seem like she was about muh womens rights and not about the abolition of capital and the state.

There go the feminists, appropriating the work of non-feminists again.

What? Have you even read her? Emma was very critical of the suffrage movement, because she was opposed to voting on principle and thought campaigning for suffrage was an unacceptable waste of time and energy. That's really just part of her larger opposition to participating in the electoral system, though. She definitely wasn't opposed to feminism, though. Emma was probably the most famous person to articulate anarcha-feminism (she adopted the term herself) during its first stages of development as a coherent ideology. So I think calling her an anti-feminist is incorrect.

you're embarrassing yourself, just stop it

She was a feminist and the video mentioned that she thought the struggle for suffrage was retarded because fuck the state.

You know that's not an argument, right? Fuck off.

"Nowhere is woman treated according to the merit of her work, but rather as a sex. It is therefore almost inevitable that she should pay for her right to exist, to keep a position in whatever line, with sex favors. Thus it is merely a question of degree whether she sells herself to one man, in or out of marriage, or to many men. Whether our reformers admit it or not, the economic and social inferiority of woman is responsible for prostitution." — Emma Goldman, the Traffic in Women

how can one person not realize just how cancerous their flag is

How can one person waste so much time making ad hominems among other non-arguments on the internet?

Right, so Anita makes a video about Goldman remarking that Goldman thought women should seize control of their own bodies. Meanwhile, Anita's earlier video output is about dictating to other women how use their bodies.

*Yawn*. Typical feminist bullshit. I demand those few moments of my life I've had to waste on this ideology of selfish egomaniacs back.

i'm serious comrad, open your eyes your flag is cancerous to our leftist revolutionary struggle

What a faggot.

>>>/out/

>>>/reddit/

you are a faggot with a dividing ideology

Anarkiddies will be Anarkiddies, oh well.

et tu, Marxposter?

Wut

I'd rather "divide" than purport to know an ideology, as you must do, LARPing and so on.

Also, this idea of a universal peace, non-"dividing", is precisely that bourgeois liberal criteria which satisfies counterrevolutionary subjects. Even Hitler was a collaborationist and sought to replace class-struggle with race ideology.

tl;dr Class struggle or GTFO.

...

...

And no matter what dismissive, smug one-liner you sit there crafting furiously for the sole purpose of telling me off, you can't stop me.

And since we're getting meta, may I even add that despite me pointing it out, you're still going to try. You can't help it. You have to get that last word in, because you're "in the right". I'm wrong and stupid, and you won't be satisfied until you prove to me and to everyone how superior you are to me. Which goes for everyone in these types of "conversations" really.

I mean, this is a shitposting thread anyway, so who cares? But everyone still browsing this thread maybe should take a look at how much effort is being put into this elaborate battle of "no u" and instead decide to do something if not productive, at least enjoyable. It's not like you'll miss out or anything. We have this argument every day.

That's what you just did and what I just responded with. My "no you" is literally warranted; get off your high-horse. You're only now "pointing it out" to do exactly what you're accusing me of, to get in that last word, to make it seem as if you're not symptomatic, if not the sole cause, of the terminal """conversation."""

A flag is only a flag.

so's he by the looks of it

God we need to do something to let these fucking liberals know they can't use our peeps to boost their revenue