Civilization 6 revealed

Who /civ/ and hyped here.

Other urls found in this thread:

store.steampowered.com/app/289070
nichegamer.com/2016/05/11/civilization-vi-announced-launches-october-21-2016/
wayback.archive.org/web/20141122131431/http://www.garath.net/sullla/civ5/whatwentwrong.html
wayback.archive.org/web/20141104212544/http://www.garath.net/Sullla/Civ5/bnwreview.html
sullla.com/Civ5/whatwentwrong.html
archive.is/vgkSU
atthegatesgame.com/
medium.com/matter/tutankhamuns-blood-9fb62a68597b#.2v93j4ek2
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Civ5 was shit, Beyond Earth was shit.

Anyone who is hype after that trash is a fucking tard.

meh, won't be worth anything until several expansions and patches come out

Better religion, better combat, better diplomacy.

Then I might consider buying it.

I hope they add more landscape diversity. I want huge mountain ranges, lush forest or different colors, shit like that. we also need like 15 more resources.

but I know we'll never get that

I just wanted to post it

Will they casualise it further?

Post your onions

its gonna be shit.

After the expansions, which will all be Steam-exclusive.

I'm sorry user. It's firaxis, it's going to be bad.

wtf is this a fucking 2007?

If you have all DLC for Civ5 it is quite enjoyable, beyond earth was really trash.

Nice graphics, civtards.

I ask myself always who makes these and why. It's like you'd make tetris or pacman porn.

At least their choice for the trialermusic was good..

the expansions made it better, but the game is in drastic need of a real diplomacy system. If they could just lift the diplomacy screen out of EU3 and dump it in civ, it'd be 3 times better

Source ?

WHY IS THIS SONG USED SO FUCKING MUCH
JESUS CHRIST, STOP IT, JUST USE A DIFFERENT SONG

store.steampowered.com/app/289070

disappointing, but it does make the zones blend in together much better than the civ 5 style

Good at least i will be able to run it on my toster

AH FUCK IT'S GONNA BE SO SHIT just let the fucking series die, FUCK. Fucking normal fags ruin everything they touch. Civ 5 with all the expansions was still a piece of shit, after 5 years of patching and expansions, game was still an unoptimized piece of shit, the turns took 5-7 seconds on a beast rig. Man I could go on and on about all it's faults but I'm wasting my time posting this.

That looks a lot like a cartoony total war mod. Especially those borders

CIV5's dumbest flaw was the lack of a faith based victory condition
what a crock of shit

Hey shill. You know we don't fall for that shit, right?

I wasn't too haopy with the diplomacy system either, especially when they denounced you and you didn't know why. Or the fact that you just can interact with city states by giving them stufd and trade with them.

...

...

It's on their steam page.

nichegamer.com/2016/05/11/civilization-vi-announced-launches-october-21-2016/

Civ V wasnt shit, it just wasn't as good as it should have been out of the box but with the DLC it was very good. I will not argue against that Beyond Earth was completely garbage, having never played it myself but I have a brother who says its completely useless.

Instead of Civilization I'll try and get into understanding Endless Legend, seems fun just fucking weird to play.

Confirmed shit. This cutesy art bullshit is the mark of death for Civ 6.

I'm not shilling, I know that most people here just play anime date simulator and dwarf fortress and nothing else, that's why I asked who /civ/ here you shitturd.

I don't care, I'm still fine playing 2,3 and 4. I probably won't even pirate it like I did for Civ 5

It's the Wilhelm scream of soundtracks.

Fuck off shill.

...

It's worse than I imagined.

/thread

...

Fuck no, i have to earn my daily pay by shilling

Buy this game guys, it will be good, just like 5th was

The system is fundamentally broken and only appeals to people who never got beyond Prince difficulty.

See Sulla's tl;dr essay on the matter.

Smart phone port confirmed.

Its WIP, is this going to be DoW3 all over again?

I hope you understand that if they show a nipple they'd lose a E10+ rating and that they're not making any SJW statement.

Saged and reported for not vidiya

Civ 3 looks better than that

There had better be stacks.


That's not really a good thing when the tile type matters for movement, defense etc.

Why do civilization games keep featuring that street shitter pedo that is in the thumbnail?

That's why I love Holla Forums so much.

then don't fucking use this painting?

Civ 3 is the second best looking Civ game tho.

every time

...

Nudity in art is allowed on youtube. Same with nudity in medical videos.

He never said that you dumbfuck, he even implied otherwise.
Read it again instead of spouting expressions nonsensically.

z-zork online?

Holla Forums functions as an entity.
Holla Forums has come to.

That's like asking why diablo games keep featuring the devil.

...

Just not white culture nudity.

he clearly says that they are the same people

They don't serve to the SJW crowd and you still complain.

Everything that contains nudity and isn't made by the followers of feminism is trash, shitlord

I was talking of certain people, I didn't say Holla Forums. My mistake, next time I shoulf say certain people, because there are people there who always suspect you of generalizing.

He has nothing to do with the theme of the games tho, Satan is literally in the title of Diablo.

Fucking Civ of all games censors a fucking painting.

Looks like it was supposed to be a mobile game.
Inb4 microtransactions in civ 6.

Does this mean Teddy Roosevelt is the new American leader?

Reminds me of the shitastic Revolution. Yeugh.

After Civ 5, Beyond Earth, and XCOM 2 I've lost any faith in Firaxis. I had a vague glimmering of hope for them after EU/EW, but XCOM 2 destroyed that hope.

So yeah, my expectations are in the basement.

Why even bother? It'll drop to $20 within a year and by then I'll know if it's bad or not.

Because every other important person in History is white and you know what SJW will say.

I think it's just a reaction to stellaris.
Was Xcom2 that bad ?

I hate that you killed my hope so quickly

...

It wasn't a bad game imo, it just left me feeling empty. EU/EW was a good foundation of an XCOM game they should have broadened on and built more complexity, instead they threw in gimmicks and called them complexity, while streamlining and removing core features (i.e interrogations, interceptions, NO UFO INTERCEPTIONS IN A GAME ABOUT ALIENS).

Oh, and hey, wouldn't you know it…


They want the game to be "accessible" to people who played Civ V–already an accessible and simplified Civ. God knows what that means. Anyone expecting stacks to return is going to feel some serious fucking anal flustering, though. There's no way they are doing anything but getting even more streamlined.

...

...

jesus fuck, that's sad
the last one was made in unity and it still looked better

Turn the grid on, dumbass

Civ Rev 2.0

I don't care about graphics, but this is an art style, and it looks like fucking Godus.

I think I'll just stick with V

...

Because his is a meme, every civ player knows this

I tried but I just got sued for sexual harassment

You're not funny, redditfag

On their steam site you can see them tasty nipples, they just removed it from jewtube.

That already happened though

It was alright for quick portable games, but nowhere near as good as the full real experience

Youtube allows you to display nudity if it's in classical art or medical procedures though

WE

accurate i guess

Apparently not, dumbass, quit overreacting

While showing egypt shit no less.

The artstyle reminds me of change from sims 3 to sims 4. I bet it will run like shit too.
It seems to be a trend to remove features with the next game where is my fucking technology trading so I am not very excited.

Also the trailer seems very safe. Sure, show america, brits and frienchies, they are popular, add Ghandi for a good measure. Where are my fucking Mongol hordes and savages?

Yeah, the art style is a disaster. I don't know how they can say with a straight face that the graphics have been improved, unless they mean it in the sense of image related.

No, it is okay. Civ team are the ones overreacting.

I think they look fine.

Bullshots nigger, pre release bullshots.
Its fucking DoW3 all over again, goddamn.

Yeah but better be on the safe site. You know if several peoples are triggered snd report they will take it down.

Two bombs were not enough.

At least all the weeb civ mods will look good with this.

Gandhi be peaceful n' shit, next thing you know they nuke your main city and put a general besides your luxury ressources.

This is why 8/v/ is best, right here.

It's just the boxart for the asian and jap release.

The in-game shit looks like this

Hinduism is a religion of peace!
He hindu nuffin.

That's Civilization Revolution 2 for ipad

And the vita version is exactly the same but with lower resolution.

Wow, it looks completely different from Civ 6.

Bullshots are supposed to look GOOD, friend. If your bullshots are turning people off, they are the opposite of a bullshot.

Mite b fun.
I liked Civ 5, so hopefully the next one will be an improvement. I've never played any other strategy games though so what do I know

You should play Alpha Centauri, best of the best when it comes to 4X games.

3D was a mistake.

You know nothing.

that's why Civ 3 is a best

5 was garbage BE was somehow worse and this will be even worse.

WELL AREN'T YOU HAPPY NINTENDO FINALLY PUBLISHES GAMES ON PC

Maybe one day. I put way too many hours into Civ 5 though and Alpha Centauri would probably be even worse. Also I'm a strategy casual, see

Wut

The problem with that proposal is that once he plays Alpha Centauri, he won't be able to play any other 4X. It'll ruin him forever.

He's saying it looks like a console kiddy game.

If you want a fun strategy game, go play Sengoku Rance. It has anime breasts and pixelated crotches, but god damn the game is so fucking good.

What?
This isnt a Mario game.

Sengoku Rance is too plot-limited to recommend it as a strategy game foremost. Don't get me wrong, it's transcendent by the standards of H games, but that's because H games generally aren't games at all.

this is fucking weird

The first couple screens from your game are supposed to attract customers. That's why they trys to photoshop them till no end.

Do you really think any publisher would release actual, unaltered screenshots of their game when it gets first publicly announced?
Hell no. Every single fucking time they're bullshots.
And if the game looks shit nontheless, tryx to imagine how it'll look in it's finished state.

Whats that? Link, please?

I… don't disagree? That's what I'm saying. It looks bad in their press screenshots. Which means it'll look bad.

But it doesn't

You forgot the part everyone is being pissed off about: hype.
Go back to reddit.


This is ugly as fuck, of course it's gonna be for ipads.

The strategy elements are still solid and quite fun to play around, even in story mode. And there's sandbox and FFA modes for pure gameplay.

Might have been about the censorship then. But it definitely looks like a game designed for tablets.

Why does every statue have micropenis?

Because the sculptors weren't faggots like you.

Time to wait 2 years for all the expansions and DLC to be released.
They better improve religion this time because I barely used it in Civ 5. Also bring back Civics from Civ 4 because those were fun as fuck.

Trailer is worse than IV and V.

The game will be shit.

What is this fucking witchcraft?

It was considered an ideal.

Are their? I thought the new game+ just changed the starting parameters a bit, with the story events still dictating the pace of the game.

If it really does have an FFA mode that is cool, never knew that, even though I beat it.

We all know it's going to be shit. What remains to be seen is just how offensive they'll get with the leftist pandering.

But it doesn't

Because that's the actual average dick size, having a big dick wasn't something people obsessed over back then.
Also he's clearly flaccid.

Unerect penis size doesn't represent erect penis size. You can have a 1inch flaccid dick and still grow to 6-7 inches when you have a boner.


This. No point in buying until the xpacs fix the major gameplay problems and add the core gameplay elements that were originally cut to meet the deadlines.

Thats a rare trump m8

TAKE THE POO TO THE LOO

...

Ghandi being in every game is literally a meme, he´s the designated Hitler stand-in since the bug in I or II I cant remember that made him maxumum warlike.

Oh fuck off, the dick is literally at eye level


Your dick is not supposed to be shorter than your balls


I don't know about that m8, dick shorter than your balls never bodes well

...

I guess you'd have a lot of experience with such a POV.

Okay we get it, you're retarded

Are you a woman? I can think of no other reason you'd be so unacquainted with the natural state of a dick. Porn is not real.

user its an image on your monitor not a real statue.

So is this game getting narrated by Sean Bean?

When an 9 foot man is standing in front of you on a pedestal yes, dick is at eye level


Because I've never seen a dick that small irl

...

Are you stupid or something?
Most people don't have large penises like you see in porn or drawings, the Romans didn't care about these kinds of things so they would sculpt penises realistically. Notice how they're all also uncut.

So you've seen a lot of dicks. Okay.

Wow, what a flagrant whore.

A good start.
Bring back stacks of units and I'll bite.

Despite it's overuse everywhere it's still a good choice.

Yeah, Zork online.

No user, that's just you.

Big cocks were considered awkward/distracting.

It was I IIRC. II had it as a joke.

Actually they thought small dicks looked more asesthetically pleasing, often sculpting them smaller than in reality.

You're a very strange individual, user. I'm not quite sure what's wrong with you.

Which is why thousands of statues all have roughly the same size?

so aesthetic

You're forgettting that spaceships game, made by Sid Meier himself.

Xcom 2 was good, sorry.

And thus the notion of feminine penises was born.

Aye they liked little diddles and made sculptures of them.

Didn't mean big diddles weren't the majority, like they've always been.

god damn ppl wtf is wrong with you
males doesn't have anything down there

Lib butthurt will coming! :^)

Bless you user for trying to salvage this thread from the faggotry.

And knowing Firaxis they'll likely pozz it up with the expansions.

As we all know civ is very historically accurate, they couldn't just lie

Holy shit he's right!

Yeah but base Civ4 is still vastly superior in any form to Civ5 with every DLC

...

This looks like Settlers 7, but with bigger and goofier units compared to buildings.

wayback.archive.org/web/20141122131431/http://www.garath.net/sullla/civ5/whatwentwrong.html
wayback.archive.org/web/20141104212544/http://www.garath.net/Sullla/Civ5/bnwreview.html

Steam forums are pretty funny. Lots of salt over the art style. I doubt it'll actually impact sales at all, though.

sullla.com/Civ5/whatwentwrong.html

Or just google "Sulla civ 5".
Sulla was one of the devs of civ 4 and he does represent the conflict of many civ4 players who just couldn't feel comfy in civ5.

On another note, I've noticed this pattern where odd civs tend to be more serious and realistic while even civs are more playful and colorful.

Finally, Civilization Revolution is a good idea: A full civ game completely designed since scratch on the idea of multiplayer. It's a good entry civ game for newcomers, too.

...

Please bring back stacks
Civ V killed long war sessions with how long it took to micro

Let's just jump to the good part:

...

Keep in mind that this is a summary.

"I believe that these problems stem directly from the decision to make civ V a one-unit-per-tile (1UPT) game. 1UPT allows a lot of flexibility in how you arrange your army; however, it only works if your army has empty space to move in. It requires an army smaller than the map. 1UPT led to small army sizes, which led to lower production and faster science, which led to the broken economy system that this game has now. The combat in civ V was based on panzer general, but that doesn't work well in a civ style game. I tried to explain why that is in this post: (In PG, England is about 500 hexes. That's enough room for very large armies to maneuver around in (and even so, things get pretty congested when you're fighting over london). In Civ V, England is only 6 hexes! What am I supposed to do there? That's not even enough room to build a proper city! The English channel is only 4 hexes and one hex wide, so you can shoot across it with archers. Poor Italy has it worst though- only 2 hexes for the Italian peninsula! And the mediterranean is only 1 tile wide! Now that's an earth map, but the same sort of problems happen on any map I play. Tight spaces, bottlenecks, absolutely no room to maneuver. Civ V warfare is just a traffic jam.)

Clearly this was a decision made early on, since it's such an important part of the game. At the same time, they wanted to keep the "civ" feel to the game, where you settle new cities, build improvements and city buildings, and go in to the city screen to adjust your citizens. Combined, this meant that they had to limit the total number of tiles in the game, and so they tried to force army sizes to be very small. A typical civ 4 army of ~50 units would be incredibly annoying to manage in the Civ V style, so they wanted to encourage armies of only 5~10 units. I hope this succession game showed how clunky warfare becomes in this game when the army sizes get large (I enjoy the early wars with small army sizes). The AI can't handle it, and the player doesn't enjoy it.

Civilization VI gameplay details:
archive.is/vgkSU

He doesn't actually explain the problem with the system in 5, he just says that the system in 1-3 didn't work.
Doesn't explain what he is talking about. I assume it's about the way happiness drops, but would be nice to see a detailed explanation
It is very much possible now to create long lasting friendships with AI, religion helps a lot in it too. You can also see what factors affect their decisions if you look at their status
MP is barely different from SP now
While I hate the insane amount of micromanagement that I have to do, the death stacks of 4 were fucking ridiculous.
Also the size problem he mentions can be easily fixed by choosing a larger map size.

A thread like this doesn't even deserve a proper reaction image with contemporary relevance. So here, have this overplayed 9gag meme.

Hyped for the next Civilization? Why? What did we get before?

The only neat thing about Civ V was the hexagon layout and the modding tools that were provided. I'll give kudos to that and if it were not for the latter, the game would be irredeemable.

Everything else was trash that only became edible trash after the "DLC", which was mostly paying extra just to get some of the Civ IV features back.

They were up to their tits in DLC for individual civilizations. Without a sale discount it would cost upwards of 30 bucks just to get all the official civs and you would STILL have less civilizations/leaders than Civ IV did with it's omnibus expansion/sanctioned mod that you can still find at retail stores near the Nancy Drew shit.

Over a hundred dollars just to get the base game proper if you actually bought things as they came out. You even had to pay almost 5 dollars for maps that were literally just grid data anyone could upload for free. Even EA shirks at their jewery.

And my god it was the most unoptimized piece of shit to ever use DirectX 11. The amount of time to just load the fucking start menu alone is atrocious, especially with the DLC. It's not even a mods issue - no - that is an entirely separate loading ordeal.

And then Beyond Earth.

Beyond Earth killed absolutely all credibility to the Sid Meier name. It's like branding your game with "Tim Shaffer" now.

It was nothing more than a Civ V mod with even further dumbed down mechanics parading as a 60 dollar game - and it dared to imply being a spiritual successor to Alpha Centauri.

So you ask us if we are hyped for Civ VI?

That trailer?

Well its got a song track that if it isn't royalty free it might as well be due to how overplayed that track has been in the past decade for various films and tv promos.

The trailer is actually just historical photos with some tweening effects over the most generic "muh humanity's accomplishments" speech I ever heard.

At least they bothered to put some effort into the promo for Civ V.

You can see here they just didn't give a fuck and are doing the bare minimum to entice delusional die hard fans and other naive consumers because that is all who could possibly be hyped for Civilization VI at this rate.

I think it looks good

But I know they're not going to bring back deathstacks so fuck it

Ah! I see they took the Sims 4 approach and ==JUST== everything up

Read the actual webpage then you fucking retard

The low-effort 'barren alien wasteland of green' look is not endearing. It looked disgusting and unnatural in Simcity: Always Online edition and does so here as well

It's funny how modern marketing manages to turn people OFF a product. It happens with a lot of movie trailers too, where you develop negative interest in a movie after seeing them. Looks like the games industry is headed in the same direction.

...

why can't devs get anything rigth?
i'm willing to bet it's dumbed dow to retardacus levels to.
…just make it go away

oh.
after BE that's all I think.
oh.


hahahaha

I think it lacks the grease filter.

...

...

...

...

WHERE ARE THE KANGZ?
THIS IS A RACIST TRAILER.

They are too busy winning world war 1.

They're really just copying Endless Legend but that statement shows just how out of touch they are with their audience. The one unit per tile was a "revolution" that nobody wanted and they're still pushing it as something that was great.

We wouldn't want to confuse new players user.

If their city management goes the way where you expand it to the grids next to the city, then yes.
But i am imagining it meaning something more along the lines of "You gotta build multiple cities/towns all over the place instead of having just a few like in the previous game".

Fun fact: the engine supports stacking. The lead dev was an intern that worked on the worst part of Civ 4 BTS (Espionage) and liked Panzer General so he threw it in. They fired the testing team halfway through testing and he fired himself after the game was a flop and has been working on vaporware ever since:
atthegatesgame.com/
It's been at least 5 years.

because you need to shake a penis to get it big?
because not all penises are the same?
because big ass penises were gross or a draw as a joke, in those times?

...

It's a fucking eyesore.

Civ 6 makes Civ 5 look good. I never thought we'd reach this point in time. Truly the end is near

No, it's not.
Wait till we see Civ VII…

Fucking roasted hahaha

Why are so many games going down this route? It seems to be popping up everywhere now. Just this weird bland cartoony style that lack any life to it. What is the point of using it if you are just going to implement it in the most bland way possible?

Just realized that those trees look like they had soiled themselves.

Laziness

Designated shitting woods?

But even lazy attempts at it at least try to look unique in some way. This bland shit is beyond even pure laziness.

I kinda like it.

Each tile in Civ V had procedurally generated textures. For example, every fucking desert tile had a heightmap and some kind of contouring happen. It took a very long time to load because of this, even if you had low settings, since it needed to generate them on the fly.

It looks like more of the same, but they really refined the process so it looks nice. I'm glad they went with a cartoony, stylized look, rather than faux realism. It'll age better.

But we all know the gameplay will be incredibly simplified again, but visually I kinda like it.

shit
how long has trump had levitation powers

...

They probably didn't want to make a trailer consisting of playing traffic cop for 100 units crossing a continent on narrow roads.

This is fucking pathetic,

No its very much shit.
Tacking on old mechanics that have been a staple of the game but for $30 dollars an expansion.
On top of that most of them aren't that in depth and suffer from breaking balance issues.

Especially considering they sell 40x the copies Endless Legend does. Why did they feel obligated to ape a tiny ant, market-wise?

I know what I'll be playing this fall and it won't be Civ VI. Endless Space 2 will probably innovate in just like they did with Endless Space and Firaxis will play catchup again.

Just like they did with Endless Legend, I mean.

I'd be happy with them if they could ever bother to implement an actual combat system in their games, rather than an "auto resolve" button masquerading as combat.

Not hyped after Civ 5 and Beyond Earth/Kill Whitey. 2K is massively infected by the SJWs.

THE TRAILER IS FUCKING CENSORED BY BLURRING OUT THE FEMALE'S NIPPLES EVEN THOUGH IT IS HISTORICAL ART.

THIS. Civ 5 even with all of the DLC was shit. It removed so many game play options from the earlier games. Removing sliders/can't change the tax and science rate, removing ocean transports for land units (a mod fixed it), and making the game more combat focused so you can't do a no war challenge. Like some user said earlier. Earlier Civ games used your army to support your empire. Civ 5 has your empire to support your army.

Confirmed fags.

…..pfffffffffttttttttttttttt
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

...

THIS

The new Civ looks like a really bad imitation of Enless Legend.
And will probably end being one as well.

Civ V was never really about graphics, but what in the fuck? It looks worse than the older games, especially with the gay cartoony shit.

As for no source ther others are complaining about.

store.steampowered.com/app/289070

NOW YOU´VE DONE IT OP

THERE I WAS THINKING ABOUT THE NICE ROUND OF VICKYII I WAS ABOUT TO PLAY AND YOU JUST WALK IN AND MAKE ME REINSTALL CIV4:BTS AGAIN

Americans yet again prove to be consumerist sheeple of the hooked nosed one.
Fuck your thread op.

this looks like civilization revolutions…

whelp, i'm going to go shoot myself. So much excitement and disappointment in spades.

Copied this from Leddit.


Some good ideas, but it looks like it's going to be shit. No mentions of bringing back sliders or making it possible to do a complete pacifist run.

I heard niggas say it was unity. If that's true then da trash.

...

So they are copying Endless Legend while missing the point entirely?

calm your autism user

Never tried Endless Legend. Pls explain.

You build a city on one hex, then you expand it with "districts" which work a tile automatically, making you expand "towards" the resources you want to work.
Also if you surround a district with others like it it levels up.
Also the map was separated to different "prefectures" where you could build one city and that city would essentially make the entire prefecture yours, though there can be some NPC minor faction villages, which unlike in Civ V aren't just idly standing by, they can give you missions which make them ally themselves with you and give you their own special unit as your auxiliary.
Or they could try to murder the fuck out of you, essentially unifying barbarians and city states together.

A lot of the ideas they are taking borrow from Endless Legend a game that absolutely humiliated firaxis, especially how the cities work. Honestly Endless Legend destroyed Civ 5 and Beyond Earth when it came out by showing how shit SHOULD be done.

I thought he looked like Jetstream Sam

I've kind of wanted this forever, being able to capture parts of cities when you besiege them and denying the use of facilities. Surrounding it and spamming guys on high-yield tiles to starve the city just isn't the same.

Might reduce the tedium a bit, but I'd rather have doomstacks back.

You're not even trying, Eurocucks

I just copied the first paragraph.
Here's the whole thing, you ungrateful bitch

...

Its bittersweet seeing the destruction of Europe.
On one side I'm sad seeing the country of my people destroyed, on the other hand I'm so tired of 20+ years of Euros acting like their shit didn't stink compared to Americans that I almost happy to see the niggers get fucked.

But then again I'm only half german, the rest is polish and Jew

I have been burned too many times. Fuck getting hyped. Nowadays you have to be pessimistic to stay sane.

I'm not a big Civ V fan, but half the shit in the review is outright wrong since the expansions came out. Like, didn't you play Civ V with the Brave New World expansion pack?

Hype for what? It outright looks bad and a wannabe Endless Legend. This isn't worthy of not getting hyped for. It's outright to get ready for a trainwreck.

A followup with the expansion was done somewhere on the site. It pretty much amounted to "Happiness/Expansion is fucked the other way now, otherwise same problems as before"

The Good:
Elevation seems a bit more natural and varied.
Water looks better.
Animated waves.
Better lighting.
Sharper outlines and shadows.

The bad:
Colors are very saturated
Everything is enlarged and comical.
Eschews finer detail.

Far from what I wanted, but could be worse.
Maybe someday we will get what's in the third pic.

Oy vey. just as long as you don't support the fucking of Europe I'm sure most don't care about the jew part just like I don't really hate mexicans just illegals though Indians are all disgusting people

Christ, I thought second screenshot was Endless Legend before opening it.

By the look of it, those are just hill tiles, with the rest of them being flat. I like the rocky coastlines though, maybe they'll actually prevent units from landing there.

whos ready to wait 3 years and 80 dollars more for the game to be pretty decent?

Didn't happen with 5.

Civilization V is trash, so I have no hopes or hype.

How do we know it humiliated Firaxis?

They weren't fucking sub saharans but the average ancient Egyptian wouldn't pass for white

Analysis of Tutankhamon's dna doesn't agree with you.
Even your pic is misleading. You can find pretty white pictures of Egyptians around from the first century AD.

M…maybe it will look better when fully zoomed out….

Royals diiffered from the common people.

"White" is a dumb, modern label of no particular scientific meaning that people of a certain political persuasion use to justify being dicks

The classical and ancient world was filled with people of varying ethnicities, and skin color was almost irrelevant to how people saw you. Greeks hated semites. Sumerians, babylonians, and assyrians viewed them as dirty immigrants, romans thought everyone except maybe the greeks and the egyptians were a bunch of fucking barbarians, and no one called anyone "white".

...

...

What fucking game is this again?

(checked)
Actually racial categorization (and the term "white race" ) appeared around sec XVII.
Sure it's not as ancient as the roman empire, but I wouldn't call it "modern" either.

How do you use it to be a dick?

Another pic

Nice try.

This


What are you trying to prove


I think it's just a real picture photoshopped with a few wonders

Seems legit

The very broad stereotyping of anyone who is not dark-skinned as "caucasian" or "white" as a broad racial category seems to be a thing that only really happens in the US (and now Europe, but that was a recent export of ours), and is pretty modern.

I know what you mean, I was thinking the other day, imagine if one of these idiots went back in time to the 100 years war or when germany was busy fighting itself and said to the king or to the duke or whatever "OMG STOP FIGHTING WERE ALL JUST WHITE BROTHERS MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN."

Aw…

They don't even have to go back in time. Just go to, say, China, and lecture people on racism. You'll find drastically different attitudes. Outside of the US and (sadly, now) Europe, you'll find tons of racism, but people don't really care about or think its a bad thing, except on a very general and idealistic level.

As an example, in China, sure, they have black immigrants and they treat them and view them like dirt, but they also treat the Uighurs, Tibetans, etc even worse, and have the same sort of sliding scale of disgust for peoples that differ from the Han median, with the lighter skin the better.

Civ 5

Yeah, I remember getting pyramids and other wonders out in the water all the time in Civ V.

And lets not forget being able to spot the wonders in fog of war

That's right.

medium.com/matter/tutankhamuns-blood-9fb62a68597b#.2v93j4ek2


The Egyptians are trying to cover up the fact that King Tut was a Jew and really all of Egypt is part of the Promise Land. It's time those dumb goyim get out of New Israel.

That's the problem with pretty much all genealogical research. Self-censorship is everywhere in that field. I've seen articles in even The Economist, which is a fucking bastion of "whatever the science says" worrying about the knock-on effects of full genomic sequencing.

Basically, they're afraid of the fact that if you have 100% understanding of how the human gene sequence works, there will be irrefutable proof that some ethnicities are worse than others at certain things. It's unavoidable.

why are they going to cartoony graphics ?

Depends on what side of the divide you're on.

Your traditional racists use it to describe an ill-defined, often-shifting group of people who should never be discriminated against (which becomes really confusing with groups like ethnic Finns).

Today's supposedly-enlightened racists use it to describe an ill-defined, often-shifting group of people who should always be discriminated against (note how Silicon Valley only has a "serious racial diversity issue" so long as Asians are lumped in with "white people.").

At any rate, I'm not sure how I feel about this new Civ announcement. Ed Beach did a pretty admirable job trying to salvage the shitshow that was Civ 5 vanilla, and I'm willing to write off the Beyond Earth team as Firaxis's retard containment division, but those graphics don't give me any sense of confidence, and as a history major, I have the sinking feeling that I'm going to watch my field of study get more shit shoveled into it as someone inevitably starts rewriting things in the name of their glorious political platform.

I like to joke that I am a triangle of hate being polish, german and Kike

MY
FUCKING
NIGGA

Because it's easier to make and optimize than hyper-realistic graphics

Normally that meme doesn't bother me, but it does every once in a while, especially when it's coming from actual media that should know better. _Everyone_ in a general sense is ignorant of anything outside their day-to-day affairs, ask the average European to name more than 2 states in the United States and see what happens.

Back in the day jews meant lots of peoples, some white.

Jesus.

Someone explain to me why this game is like Endless Legend but shit this thread is too damn big.

I liked their old spirit warrior thing they had at least they aren't Abos.

For you, This isnt 4chan, the thread will still be here for at least a couple of hours.

SID MEIERS CIVILIZATION VI: CLASH OF CLANS

wow that looks like shit

endless legend is still a better game then civ be, and endless space 2 is in the works and is shaping up pretty gud

Should've put the Mind Worms to good use, looks like the University has taken control of this particular part of the Firaxis project.

After civ:be god no.

I giggled user.


Sex is the most medical thing on the planet.

Holy fuck I am already pissed. They just ripped off this carl sagan shit.
FUCKING TF2 GRAPHICS WHAT THE FUCK

Hopefully it's not dumbed down again.

Easier to port to mobile devices in the near future.

Didn't you get the memo? civ is about how enlightened we have become as a species. There were no wars in the past, that is a lie told by the patriarchy to justify the existence of guns. Only by showing how peaceful the past was, can we change other peoples attitudes and put an end to anything I find to not fit under "enlightened"

...

>mfw no one here has actually gone to >>>/civ/ and keep using it thinking it actually has something to do with the civilization games.

Are you saying the gameplay is too complex for the intended audience? Better axe more features.

In ancient Egypt the pyramids were near the Nile.

near and in are extremely different things user

just like rivers and oceans

...

Exactly this, they're trying to sell you the idea of mankind's history as some kind of overprotective
kiddy playground. The trailer is insulting as if what it wants to "teach" wasn't already said over and over in Civ5's trailers

The average ancient anyone never cared about race in the first place because there was no distinction. That still doesn't mean white aren't superior, whites did manage to create the modern world, which can't be said for dumb nigger africans

Why did the thread continue after this post?

Either way, if you want new 4X just play Endless Legend or Age of Wonders 3. Civ is shit and if Firaxis keeps to their status quo, Civ VI will have less content than Beyond Earth and will run worse than XCOM 2.


I think the OP was sneakily (or accidentially) calling the people who still like Civ autistic :^)

I like it.

Fuck it. everything else about the game had me on the fence, them censoring liberty in their trailer had me falling off, but this has me hitting the ground and walking away altogether.

This game is only like EL in graphical design, and even then, only superficially. It's closer to Civilization Revolution or Clash of Clans than Civ V or IV.

Oh, hey, it's just like Civ IV!

IV looks better than VI, nigger.

Wow you are really good at arguments, you totally showed me by telling me to go bacl to reddit.

Because everyone was fucking white back then.

Actually, now that I think of it the even Civ games have a more cartoony look and the odd Civ games are more realistic

All of them were caucasian but half of those groups would not pass for "white" today

So you fucking telling me that Europe wasn't white?

New album when?

Pretty funny given that latinos and asians are considered 'white' when it benefits the establishment.

You telling me Africa was not black?
Egypt and Carthage was in Africa that means they was black and shit.

cutting the original footage and gluing its bits together

To be fair, the roof in second pic looks slightly better.

Cool shilling buzzword

Hey, why have you spoiled the surprise?