Tfw too smart to be a communist

...

Other urls found in this thread:

monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm
eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc--baa081108.php
t1nyurl.com/6tr9e6t
oregonstate.edu/dept/humanities/claims-genetic-race-differences-rise-again
cyberussr.com/rus/ly-tl-cv.html
cyberussr.com/rus/lyse-nkvd.html
imichurin.narod.ru/liu2004.htm
imichurin.narod.ru/flegr_lysenko.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

t. bourgeois

t.bourgeois

*pats head*

←–

Source?

monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

it is known.

monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

"why socialism", by albert einstein, duh

No that's the blank look of "too much Cold War propoganda so think I'm too smart to be a communist but actually have just unquestioningly accepted neo liberalism as it was fed to me'

This is an exact description of how I was raised.
The west beat communism, phew thank goodness I live in the west where we have toilet roll.
Praise Alan Greenspan.

But then again, rightists claiming that scientists are stupid is nothing new.

Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, but of course you never were smart enough to already know this.

le fallacy fallacy

by the way, i was telling him the source asshat.

why debate when you can yell a random logical fallacies to immediately win the argument also thats not how it works you dumb cunt

An appeal to authority is claiming that a certain position is the correct one because it's the position held by a person or institution in authority. Think of all the Burgers who argue that free speech is just an extension of property rights for no other reason than the fact that this is the Supreme Court's interpretation.

There's nothing wrong with referencing someone else's argument if you think they have a good argument, it becomes Appeal to Authority when you just name drop them as if that alone proves your point.

Here's an ad hominem for you pal.

You're a fucking idiot.

...

Appealing to "im smarter than you, nener nener" is also pretty shit tbh and yet its the only criticism people have for Socialism

It's only fallacious if you're citing someone who is not qualified or related to the subject manner.

1. the original post was


2. Someone posted evidence that Einstein (a person who is likely significantly smarter than OP) was a commie.

This is not fallacious. OP was BTFO

Smh tbqh

Even if he wasn't a plagiarist it still doesn't matter what he thinks since economics wasn't his field.

bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

u sure about dat m8

...

Does this mean it doesn't matter what Holla Forums thinks since no one there even has a field?

...

Speak for yourself I am a biologist and recognize the bilogical differences between races.

kek

the irony that this is your reply

proof you didn't even read the first few paragraphs out of intellectual curiosity
you're just going straight to talking shit

the essence of being a Holla Forumsack

itt: Holla Forums is embarrassing itself

again

"Einstein plagiarized the work of several notable scientists in his 1905 papers on special relativity and E = mc2, yet the physics community has never bothered to set the record straight in the past century."

You're the one who didn't read.

I knew this was coming but it's still funny

T- retard

eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc--baa081108.php
t1nyurl.com/6tr9e6t (docs.google)

oregonstate.edu/dept/humanities/claims-genetic-race-differences-rise-again

"Claims regarding the biological bases of race, and the importance of genetic differences between races, are not limited to the fringe, said Kaplan, but are moving into the mainstream. Scientists are looking for genes related to health disparities, for instance, between West Africans and Europeans. The National Institutes of Health is explicit in recommending that health differences between black and white Americans be addressed in part through genetics research."

there's no such thing as """"""races""""""

Read the post above you fucktard, the research was done by people who were far smarter than Stirner.

Stirner was a pretty spooked guy

feels liberating, man.

your ignorance and salt fills me with glee

You seem salty at the fact that my IQ is higher than Stirner's was. How does it feel? How does it feel that I'm smarter than him, that my words carry more weight because of my superior cognitive abilities and abstract thinking? Does it hurt?

APPEAL TO AUTHORITY APPEAL TO AUTHORITY

kek

Citing reputable sources is not appealing to authority.

is this a comrade shitposting

because fucking lol

How did you live past 5 being such a gigantic retard?

your spooks have no power here

Scientifically valid IQ tests are not spooks. I took 3 separate tests and scored an average of 172. Strienr's was probably 110-115.

Yeah you're so smart using Ad Hominem fallacies

if this really is a comrade, 100/10 my side are in another dimension

if not, I don't think I can laugh harder but I'll try

Fact based critique of your opponent's merit is not a fallacy. Is that what people with IQ's below 160 do? Call everything that hurts their fee fees a fallacy?

Is a man wrong if he claims the earth is round just because he has an IQ of 70?

Hoe only knows that because someone with a higher IQ found that out. Anyone can parrot facts. However a man with an IQ of 70 can't design a building, or cure a disease.

where's the building you've designed, mister "I'm so lacking in self-confidence I had to take an IQ test three times to make myself feel better than others" 172 IQ points? Where's the disease you've cured?

Now that's a real fallacy.

I share this feel, although it's one of despair as I'm not autistic enough to be a leftcom, or stupid enough to be an anarkiddie.

I'm not sure if I could sleep at night if I eradicate something that might improve the Earth.

...

No, dumbass, was given 3 differently formatted IQ tests when I was 15 and the scores where averaged out by the school psychologist.

Ok someone with a higher IQ found out that the earth is round which is why someone with an IQ of 70 knows the Earth is round. Then by your same logic since we are talking about intellectual merit I could also argue that since you browse Holla Forums that you might be blinded by your own racism (a high intelligence doesn't get rid of being human and making decisions based on emotions) and that you just dismiss other scientific research about race and that we have a right to distrust you based on your intellectual merit.

Sure, but you being a leftist absorbed in sophistry and Lysenkoism are too cemented in these false ideas to acknowledge the biological aspects of race.

It's not the biological differences we're questioning you literal caveman, it's the conceptual parameters you call "race" which are effectively arbitrary and completely biased towards our own cultures' preferences.

Sure, maybe I'm to absorbed within my ideology to change my mind. With this in mind I have concluded I am leftist scum that decides his ideas based on ideology instead of intellect and you are a racist though intelligent man who decides his ideas based on his prejudice instead of logic. In the end we both lose because we decided to rip each others merit down instead of each others ideas.

Then again maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right or maybe it's the opposite. Maybe we are both wrong and maybe the whole of humanity does not know anything.

In the end there is only one thing I do know. I know that I know nothing.

"it's the conceptual parameters you call "race" which are effectively arbitrary" I never mentioned anything of the sort, what the fuck are you rambling on about?

My bio professor says race is a social construct. See how this works? This argument of yours doesn't lead anywhere

Because you say it isn't?

lol people who constantly spout their worthless IQ scores on image boards are consistently garbage

You mean how a sect of ideologically driven pseudobiologists went against the mainstream of science to confirm their own biases? Hmmm…

Splain this to me

...

Lysenko was right though, Epigenetics is a thing.
People are shaped by their material conditions even on a biological level and without any social darwinism.

Lysenko also said if you planted the same species of plant together they wouldn't compete cuz reaons, and dig rly deep that's where the most fertile soil is. He was a retard, him being right about epigenetic's was a fluke, at best.


Yet here you are, shitposting on an image board while Stirner created an entire school of political thought. And Albert Einstein, who you are apparently "smarter" than, changed physics.

So when we say it's not an accurate representation of a persons "intelligence", we mean you, are for all intents and purposes a retard, while simultaneously possessing a higher "intelligence quotient" than some of the most influential intellectuals that ever lived.

You mean gene expression. Mutagens can change genes, but socioeconomic factors will not change genes in an individual.

You mean changed plagiarism?

Einstein did all the work on the theory of General Relativity retard, he worked in almost complete isolation until the end of 1915.

how about you do research before you post?
cyberussr.com/rus/ly-tl-cv.html
cyberussr.com/rus/lyse-nkvd.html

...

...

If you're so much smarter than Stirner, why do you constantly get btfo by him dum-dum.

imichurin.narod.ru/liu2004.htm
imichurin.narod.ru/flegr_lysenko.pdf
how about this?
still no good?

Epigenetics is literally variations in genes expression. The term is correct.

All religion based on the Jew book is trash.
The circumstances (and therefore the fractals) have changed enough that it only works in certain parts of the Levant.

They're called ethnicities now, because culture has some biological origins, and also because racist people didn't like being hounded for being too racist. Fair enough.

GET A ROOM FUCCBOIS
I like to sit on fences like pic related

...

...

communism beat itself