Holla Forums I've got a question. Are there any games that are similar in quality/enjoyablity to either of these two games? Here's what I played that were somewhat similar:
I know damned well GA 2 isn't coming and if it is it's not going to be good. Are there any games of this genre that are actually pretty enjoyable and preferably f2p because I'm a cheapskate or should I just lose hope?
Also if you just want to talk about either Global Agenda or MNC go ahead. A reminder that crescent jetpacks are for scrubs and poison medics and robotics are the best classes. Reconshitters go to hell
Ryder Jackson
overwatch really isn't MOBAlike at all, it's more like TF2 gametypes with skill cooldowns
Jaxson Myers
It only really copies the gameplay in its basic format, TF2 still has a lot more complexities to it than OW
Isaiah Stewart
Like what? Do you mean the player is given far more control with what tools they have?
Andrew Roberts
i don't disagree, but i also probably liked the OW beta more than any modern TF2 experience since that game is a bloated corpse now
granted i enjoyed the beta a lot i can see it going stale fast if they don't keep their promise of adding new shit, or worse making it f2p and taking down the paywall to keep the underclasses out
anyone who says OW should be F2P is probably a fucking russian
Carson Myers
If you just want a decent ASSFAGGOTS that focuses more on action then Awesomenauts is a good game, but it's a platformer, not a shooter.
Lincoln Moore
I think what user is saying is that a game like TF2 makes its classes stand out in lots of ways. Stats, health, movement, special abilities, weapons, etc.
While a game like overwatch pretty much changes only health and abilities, and given the nature of abilities it's only natural that you get to see a lot of slight permutations to a singular ability shared across characters and games.
Also yeah, the player is given far more control with advanced techniques in TF2(rocket jumping for example) or GA(jetpacks before the mind free hands free/crescent jetpacks update) than a game that locks your character to four abilities and standard movement.
But is it worth the 40 dollars or 60 dollars or whatever it is they're charging it for? I doubt it.
I guess you could say I'm interested in third person assfaggots, no top down or 2d stuff. Airmech is airdead too, what a shame.
Jonathan Wood
Shouldn't be f2p, but 40 burger coupons is roughly twice what it's worth. I enjoyed the beta, but it got stale by the second day. Not enough emergent gameplay cause the abilities do only what blizz wants them to do, too many redundant classes, no personality.
Jason Jackson
it's 40 bucks, but since blizzard are jews if you go to the official site they make you go a roundabout way to get the 40 dollar version and not the MEGA SUPER EXTRA SKIN EDITION FOR 60
it seems steep either way but i'd rather buy a game once than deal with f2p shit
at this point i'll probably only get it if i have more than 2 friends to play it with to get 40 dollars worth of hours in it
30 freedom dollars i probably wouldn't have any issue with getting it. i also don't know how much more is in the game compared to the beta which is a bad move on blizzards part since i could have very easily experienced it all in one weekend if they don't have more stuff for full release
Hunter Adams
I still say TF2 has a chance of being redeemed, especially with the focus on balance Valve has tried doing now
It shouldn't be F2P but it's nowhere near worth $40, especially with the content that's in it now. $20 would be understandable, but $40 for about 10 maps, limited server selection, and not many gamemodes just gives off a bad impression
