Okay, pretending Battlefield 1 won't be total shit, what weapons would you like to see in the game?
Okay, pretending Battlefield 1 won't be total shit, what weapons would you like to see in the game?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtubemultiplier.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
A gun for you op
...
There's suspension of disbelief, and then there's just flat out idiocy.
paris gun
Winchester Model 1897 or 1912 assuming that it actually is good and they don't give shotguns 10 yards effective range.
Okay, pretending Battlefield 1 won't be shilled here everyday until release, what kind of integers would you like to see?
Potato Masher salad
...
I am very much looking forward to Battlefield 1 and I'm not even shilling. The setting is amazing, I think EA DICE are fantastic developers, the graphics look amazing, the sound department of EA DICE is pretty much the best out there, etc. I don't understand the hate except
Such a """""""wonderful""""""" company, I hope they're giving you more than a few pennies to shill for them.
If you have played BF:1942 and BF:Vietnam you will see they play very differently to all other battle fields, I liked those so hate what has happened to the series.
As for EA being anything but condensed evil fuck you my good sir.
I played Battlefield Vietnam and every game since except Hardline and love what happened to the series: They improved it.
Reddit-tier comment.
You are doing a bad job fitting in
How much do they pay you nigger?
You're not from here, leave.
They changed it, if they improved it or fucked up everything is subjective. You think it got better, I think it turned to shit.
le cant attack with argument
le shill xDDDD
Fact of the matter is that I have 400+ hours in Battlefield 2 (and not even counting the mods) and probably 150+ in Vietnam, as well as 250 in Battlefield 3. I know what I am talking about.
I mean, hell, Holla Forums worships the lowpoint of the series: the Bad Company spin-offs. Literally generic console shooters.
The weapon of love
Honestly what I want too see more than any weapon is mass infantry. Massive amounts mass infantry.
I doubt console parity would make it possible. WW1 mod for Battlefront 2 when?
What did Battlefield 3 do worse than Battlefield 2 that isn't maps, squad size and lack of commander mode?
The only thing you've proven is that you have shit taste and you're willing to support the cancer that is EA in order to play their latest blue tinted mindless shooter.
NIGGER
I
G
G
E
R
Let's not turn this thread into a porn dump now.
Very good arguments user.
Even redditors aren't this stupid
Give me one good reason to support EA.
...
Your argument is subjective.
I would love to see realistic damage forcing organised attacks to have any chance of taking anything.
When did I say I liked BF2?
(checked)
Lets
There's nothing to argue, faggot
winchester m1895 7.62x54R
you're kidding yourself, the game will be mediocre. DICE are unskilled cucks.
Which Battlefield did you like, then?
Reminder that the only thing worse than bad publicity is no publicity
the respawning mechanic removes all pacing and flow from the game. enemies spawn from every direction at all times and there is no downtime to maneuver. this alone turned the game from a freeroaming battlefield to CoD:MW braindead constant action.
the new psychotic pacing of the game made intrusive HUD assists and spotting mechanics mandatory, further dumbing down the experience.
The two that didn't involve EA.
Kar98k
All of them were published by EA, retard.
Alright, that is a good argument and I agree with you. It should have gone back to SQ-leader only spawn and modified so that you cannot spawn on him while he is engaging in battle, as well as removing the spawn immunity whenever you spawn on a squadmember.
Look, Battlefield 3 wasn't without problems but it was certainly better than it's predecessors.
It's a great feeling in RO2 when you're taking pot-shots while waiting for your squad commanders to coordinate their smoke grenades so we can survive the charge to the enemy positions with enough men to stand a chance of taking them due to likelihood of a one shot kill.
I also hope the get it together and make cavalry playable. I can't think of a single game that has done cavalry good, only one that gets close is Mount&blade which is okay.
It wasn't around until 1934.
All baiting aside, i enjoyed bf3 greatly before season pass, it was a good game, maybe needed little bit more of environmental destruction nonetheless it was good
DICE can make good games
My bad, Gew98 then
have you played its predecessors?
BF3 gunplay was a near copy of CoD - the recurring theme in BF3 since DICE's company goal was to be "the CoD killer"
no recoil, low TTK, fast reload animations, no movement penalties.
this removes the learning curve for casual's sake.
it also directly conflicts with the games poor tick rate and client side hit detection, making gunfights a peekaboo craps game.
I read that you can play the female sandnigger from the trailer.
Which is stupid as hell, but at least she was riding a horse the few seconds we saw her.
Did you even play BF3?
Don't worry, EA DICE is one of the best developers out there. They'll make cavalry good and fun.
Why not after the season pass? The expansions only improved Battlefield 3 and some of the patches were a godsend. BF3 had a terrible attachment balance on release in my opinion.
Yes I have, as I said before. Have you?
Lie
The fans mostly made that a thing, and that was already since Bad Company 2.
More than any of its predecessors
About the same as it's predecessors, faggot. 3-5 hits, unless headshot. Literally like Battlefield 2/Vietnam
Not much faster than it's predecessors except for explosives
What are you even talking about here? The infinite sprint?
They were all published by EA but EA didn't own DICE until after BF:Vietnam was finished.
You can, the devs has said they were interesting in the mounted warfare of the middle east too iirc.
I have no mistake they're doing it, I just want them to do it well. Few games even get so far as decent when it comes to mounted combat. Especially when it's melee-capable mounted combat.
No one has done cavalry good, but that tidbit aside I have seen and played DICE games before. Most of us has. We are not reddit or 4chan. We know they are bad, buggy messes.
Please serve your slop in those other sites that will eat it up. We won't.
because im a poor slav and i didnt had money to buy it
Also it alienated parts of fanbase from game, they were moments when 80% of servers were maps from DLC
Mustard gas. Flamethrowers. What said. Shotguns should have a realistic range, just to make them more awesome (in the actual meaning of the word: producing interest and fear at the same time)
Artillery, artillery, artillery artillery.
I remember a German poem, just about the sound of a machine gun nest getting blasted by artillery.
It is called Schtzngrmm, a very rough pronunciation of the word Schützengraben, which translates to trech:
schtzngrmm
schtzngrmm
t-t-t-t
t-t-t-t
grrrmmmmm
t-t-t-t
s———c———h
tzngrmm
tzngrmm
tzngrmm
grrrmmmmm
schtzn
schtzn
t-t-t-t
t-t-t-t
schtzngrmm
schtzngrmm
tssssssssssssss
grrt
grrrrrt
grrrrrrrrrt
scht
scht
t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t
scht
tzngrmm
tzngrmm
t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t
scht
scht
scht
scht
scht
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
t-tt
"Poem" may be taking it a little too far, and the faggot who wrote it never experienced the first world war himself, but it is still impressive.
nigger are you fucking serious. this company is owned by EA games, CoD was raking in the cash, and all of the sudden they copy half of CoD's interaction features.
you honestly think there wasn't an EA management monkey telling them to do these things. are you fucking dense??
But they didnt my man
> Talking about guns again.
Jesus Christ you faggots are pathetic, the majority of you only know about guns from playing CoD or Battlefield in the first place.
EA will make this the single biggest "diversity" fest they can and fill it full of revisionist history, they even said so themselves.
* according to the March 2015 survey
ebin kneejerk
Retard fueled on maymays
I suppose that does suck if you don't own the DLC. I don't really know how they could let users play together otherwise though.
Like what? You really are just a retard aren't you.
You are bad at your job.
infinite instant sprint
quick knife instant kills
absence of recoil
etc etc
oh wait what about SEASON PASSES
or premium or whatever the fuck it was called
here's your reply
Lie. Sprint winds-up UNLIKE its previous games. However its true that it's infinite. Thank God for that by the way. Did you even play the previous games?
Only from behind, otherwise two slashes. I believe BF2 was three slashes. Boohoo
Absolute lie
More recoil than ANY of the previous games
Such as?
Another le kneejerk reaction. Fucking retard. BF's DLC includes more stuff per dollar than previous games expansions of that franchise.
Maps were quite big, nothing bad with it
How else you make knifes effective?
Also animation was played so your teammate could save you also they looked cool
Bullshit, depended on weapon and attachments, also it low recoil is not a necessarily bad thing
Agree
Shills on high activity this week. Its gonna get real bad around e3.
Also reminder that bf3 had tons of content, lots of camouflages, weapons, attachments
Unlocking this was my guilty pleasure
Why should they be? Don't bring a knife to a gunfight.
This coupled with the shit netcode leads to you shooting a guy at close range and getting hits, yet somehow he gets a backstab animation on you.
Oh I didnt realize I was replying to an idiot. Maybe you like cod tier weapons but any sensible person sure doesnt.
Sounds like a song text by Einstürzende Neubauten.
Didn't they make an album about WW1 recently?
fuckit. enjoy your CoD clone best mass marketed shooter current year.
gonna to go play some Squad or Planetside 2
...
Kill yourself, please.
Yeah, ok, have your fun marketing to us on how "good" the new battlefield is so you can live a poor life only playing battlefield making pennies shilling on an imageboard that normalfags dont visit too often.
I barely even talked about the new Battlefield. I discussed other people about the direction of the franchise.
You just plunge your fat head into a pillow and scream "SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLL".
Just mocked this up out of boredom. /k/ uses it from time to time to make combat ambiance vids.
youtubemultiplier.com
Dindufield 1 will be fucking garbage but hopefully it leads developers who can actually make games make the WW1 we deserve
How about that Verdun game, is it any good?
It's ok. Dying playerbase.
...
It's shit and that's why it's dying.
Dunno where you get your stats but young people can own guns in quite a few places.
Also, owning a gun isn't required to have an interest.
That would be quite a strange way of marketing. I can only assume you're pretending.
Cei-Rigotti prototype.
I played it for a bit and no. Showed potential but the end result is a buggy, laggy ghost town.
It's not, it's just not as good the Battlefield franchise.
They fixed the recent bugs though. I like it but every map plays out the same.
I was actually looking to get into it again after the new update, but I got out specifically because of those reasons in the cap. Is it still as bad?
lainchan is worse than /g/
"The only thing worse than bad publicity, is no publicity"
It's less bad. Population is up so there's more fights, continents are now soft-locked by faction percentage so fights are more even, base building gives the tank autists something to do besides shoot spawn rooms. I played for like six hours on Saturday and only had two fights get shit up by air.
What's the point in living?
Sounds lame.
It's no worse than real WW2 games with all those hand-cranked guns that shoot wee little pellets.
A helmet as a weapon. I want to beat people to death with my helmet when the shovel breaks from crushing so many skulls.
Who has the motive to see both sides defeated? Apart from the Jews I mean
It was me, user.
I capped it.
Something isn't right.
There has to be a catch.
...
You would have a better time playing Battlefield 1942
Just stick to Verdun, unless of course the game actually comes out good.
They already got a shit ton of jews fucking shit up in Russia back in WW1.
Well, given EA's track record I half expect this to end up being set in an alternate WW1 and instead of the western powers at war, it'll be black guys vs those evil white men. You'll be liberating their strong white women from their evil clutches while praising Allah.
Already confirmed.
You play a strong muslim womyn praising Allah.
Sometimes I hate being right.
right?!
holy shit ive been begging for for this, hell id even eat a movie or book about it up. Zipang and Kirov didnt do it for me
I'd like everything that was used.
I know this is a hypothetical, but I honestly think the best WW1 game would be by the RO guys, but it'll be shit even then. Just do what they did with the dialog.
You've got only one valid point and that's the sound department. That's the one thing that has always been consistently good about Battlefield games
That's some low quality bait, faggot.
I'm not saying that BF2 is a perfect game. It certainly has its own problems but at least it played decently and was good fun.
Adding such a big progression system didn't do the game any good, I think. For instance you had to level the Assault class in BF4 so you could effectively heal teammates and work as a part of the team.
I think that BF2 and BF2142 had the better progression system where you only had about two weapons to unlock that weren't necessarily worse or better than the default weapons for the respective class.
Trench spike
I don't know what's worse: Having to unlock defibs or having to unlock flares.
I'd personally like to see this beautiful creature as an attachment for every raifu.
It's worse enough as it is.
I completely forgot about the vehicle level ups and vehicle regeneration.
Probably the worst "features" they've added to the game. You don't even have to rely on your teammates to fix you up.
The only thing you have to do is drive somewhere save and wait a bit. HP regeneration really is a curse nowadays.
I bet even the Mark I in Battlefield 1 has regenerating health and drives as fast as a Formula 1 car even though tanks used to drive at walking speed.
Still shilling?
For how many weeks have you been contracted?
I have a feeling they may actually not have paid map packs in this game, at least based on the DLCs and descriptions on Origin right now. Looks like they're all item content packs rather than maps. Would be a small step, but a step nonetheless, in the right direction for EA if they started to just sell cosmetics and maybe weapons rather than maps too.
Lots and lots of mustard gas. And trench raiding clubs.
CoD in trenches with boring gameplay.
BF3 is the cancer that killed the franchise.
Gunplay is slower and it feels like you have 30kg of gun in your hands.
Shittiest maps from BF2 as DLC.
Players spawning from everywhere all the fucking time.
CLIENT SIDE RETARDED FUCKING HIT DETECTION.
Regenerating fucking everything.
Unbalanced weapons out the ass.
Claustrophobic flag positioning.
4 player shitsquads.
Useless fucking voip that doesn't work 95% of the time.
Unlimited vehicle ammo because leelelelelele.
NO COMMANDER MODE BECAUSE LOUDMOUTH FAGGOT KIDS DON'T LIKE IT.
See that helicopter? Just ignore it and it'll die.
FUCK YOU
OH
AND NO FUCKING SQLS!
FUCK
We finally get a WWI shooter that everyone is begging for, but it's only after these people milk the shit out of modern shooters.
Fuck off, nigger.
#wewuztrenchesnsheeeit
WEW
HOLY FUCK THAT LAST ONE, WHAT THE FUCK!!!!?!?!?!
Battlefield is now basically Call of Duty with vehicles. Which makes me wonder why I'd play Call of Duty over Battlefield.
WW1 was a war fought between colonial powers.
Be glad that they didn't choose the protagonist to be a Chinese labourer.
Would have still been more appropriate than a filthy, uncultured, disgusting, monkey brain, smelly, sweaty, aids carrying, chicken craving, lip smacking, jibe ass, hotheaded, deadbeat, melon breaking, tv stealing, degenerate
N I G G E R
I
G
G
E
R
I'm hoping for some polearms like glaives, halberds and naginata.
...