ZIONISTS FINANCED HITLER TO POWER

You did some good research here. Too bad the pol mods don't want to hear anything bad about their fuhrer

Read the damn thing you fool, i said he was financed by the elite that knew they would be able to destroy Germany and abuse its history for the following 100 years in a giant PSYOP,

NOT THAT HE WAS A PUPPET

Trips confirm you are triggered. Hitler did nothing wrong. He was a brilliant man (and as a man) he made a few blunders along the way. The fourth Reich won't make those mistakes.

Gas yourself.

The biggest was not gassing the kikes.

The difference i already mentioned is that he may have been a puppet that was unaware of it. Not a WILLING puppet.

Thank you. Shills and ignorant "lalalala i can´t hear you" posters will not be able to comprehend the meaning of my post, but thats what you have to expect here on /pol.

Again, i am not saying that Hitler was part of the conspiracy, but instead that he was used by them ass a pawn on a chess board in a far reaching plan.

yo ho yo ho near the hooknose I'll never go

The webm I posted addresses most of the key points in your narrative.

You aren't bringing anything new to the table, we've all been through this many times.

You should put the video into bulletpoints, better for tl;dw and it'll make the shills shut the fuck up that much faster.

Alright but how do you explain the connection of Max Warburg to I.G. Farben that lasted until 1938? How do you explain that none of the American members of the directors board of I.G. Farben were questioned in the Nuremberg trials, despite the international activities of this company? How do you explain the cartel of Standard Oil and I.G. Farben, that involved the Rockefellers and the Warburgs? These things are no myths, they are documented facts.

It's audio of this article, read by the author.
americanfreepress.net/bush-rockefeller-rothschild-hitler/

Having business interests in a country with a booming economy ≠ controlling or even supporting it.

Still doesn´t explain why the American directors of I.G. Farben wheren´t questioned, but next question: How do you explain this?

"It is true that" Sidney Warburg" may well have been an invention, in the sense that" Sidney Warburg" never existed. We assume the name is a fake; but someone wrote the book. Zimmerman and Sonderegger may or may not have committed libel to the Warburg name, but unfortunately when we examine James P. Warburg's affidavit as published in von Papen's Memoirs we are left as much in the dark as ever. There are three important and unanswered questions: (1) why would James P. Warburg claim as a forgery a book he has not read; (2) why does Warburg's affidavit avoid the key question and divert discussion away from "Sidney Warburg" to the anti-Semitic Sonderegger book published in 1947; and (3) why would James P. Warburg be so insensitive to Jewish suffering in World War II to publish his affidavit in the Memoirs of Franz von Papen, who was a prominent Nazi at the heart of the Hitler movement since the early days of 1933?

Not only were the German Warburgs persecuted by Hitler in 1938, but millions of Jews lost their lives to Nazi barbarism. It seems elementary that anyone who has suffered and was sensitive to the past sufferings of German Jews would avoid Nazis, Naziism, and neo-Nazi books like the plague. Yet here we have Nazi von Papen acting as a genial literary host to self-described anti-Nazi James P. Warburg, who apparently welcomes the opportunity. Moreover, the Warburgs had ample opportunity to release such an affidavit with wide publicity without utilizing neo-Nazi channels.

The reader will profit from pondering this situation. The only logical explanation is that some of the facts in the "Sidney Warburg" book are either true, come close to the truth, or are embarrassing to James P. Warburg. One cannot say that Warburg intends to mislead (although this might seem an obvious conclusion), because businessmen are notoriously illogical writers and reasoners, and there is certainly nothing to exempt Warburg from this categorization."

An addition:
"If the book was a forgery, then by whom was it written? James Warburg admits he does not know the answer, and he writes: "The original purpose of the forgery remains somewhat obscure even today."

"Any private citizen who forged such a book without inside government materials would have to be remarkably well informed."

"The only motive that seems acceptable is that the unknown author had knowledge a war was in preparation and hoped for a public reaction against the Wall Street fanatics and their industrialist friends in Germany — before it was too late. Clearly, whoever wrote the book, his motive almost certainly was to warn against Hitlerian aggression and to point to its Wall Street source, because the technical assistance of American companies controlled by Wall Street was still needed to build Hitler's war machine. The Standard Oil hydrogenation patents and financing for the oil from coal plants, the bomb sights, and the other necessary technology had not been fully transferred when the "Sidney Warburg" book was written. Consequently, this could have been a book designed to break the back of Hitler's supporters abroad, to inhibit the planned transfer of U.S. war-making potential, and to eliminate financial and diplomatic support of the Nazi state. If this was the goal, it is regrettable that the book failed to achieve any of these purposes."

All of these are lies spouted by faggots.
Faggots like (you) OP.

Also
Nice source faggot

I said none of the things you listed. There have been fundings by I.G. Farber, which is well-documented. Max Warburg was a director of I.G. Farber until 1938. Therefore, i am connecting some dots here to create a theory about how the wicked elite abused Hitler for their plans. Nowhere did i say that Hitler was in on it. Please read the whole thing or go back to your echochamber you fucking nigger.

To defame Hitler, just like The Mind of Adolf Hitler, and the other publications pushing the same narrative. Mystery solved.

Jeff Rense is actually pro-Hitler now.

If you could read you would know i never said you faggot.i said faggots like you spout those same lies.but you're a kike so what would you know.
Your shill thread is bumplocked chaim.i'll gladly spam/sagebomb it later if i get bored :^)

Not an argument nigger, the mods probably haven´t even read the thread. How does it make me a kike if i claim that an elite consisting of Zionists and globalists used Hitlers plans to achieve their long-term goals by funding him, then destroying his nations, killing many whites and using the holocaust to gain the moral authority and to demonize nationalism? Hitler wasn´t even involved, he was duped according to this THEORY.

So the known nazi Fritz von Papen mentions a book in his memoires that defames his fuehrer? Makes no sense.

Franz von Papen described it as "libelous" and included James P. Warburg's affidavit confirming that it was a fabrication in the appendix to his book. He also wasn't on very good terms with Hitler, given that many of his confidants were purged on the Night of the Long Knives.

...

t. mod

If he wasn´t on very good terms with Hitler and the book is libelous, why wouldn´t he just say that the book is the truth or just ignore it? Why would he include a member of the "international clique of jewish bankers" which Hitler talked about in his speeches as the great enemy, to discredit this supposedly forged book and give him the opportunity to defend his name? Why should i trust a person whose family played a major role in installing the Federal Reserve? The affadavit contains NO proof at all that its forged. If von Papen wasn´t compromised, why would a rich intrigant jew associate with him and why would he give this book so much attention? He should be using the opportunity to throw some dirt on the elitist bankers Hitler hated, especially since its hinted at that Sydney Warburg is a jewish member of the Warburg family.. It still makes no sense. There are many things that don´t add up and many hints for an involvement of the elite. Remember that they are very good at covering up truth. Why not sacrifice millions of live to forever eliminate nazism by pointing to Hitler as the ultimate boogeyman?

...

Why are you trying so hard yo rationalize citing a fraudulent book by an author who didn't exist that doesn't even fit your narrative?

Notice that there are two books. The 1933 book and the Sonderegger edition that was published a decade later.
Here is what James Warburg wrote in von Papens memoires about the first book and a commentary:
"the book contained a mass of libelous material against various members of my family and against a number of prominent banking houses and individuals in New York· I have never to this day seen a copy of the book. Apparently only a handful of copies escaped the publisher's withdrawal."

Why does he lie?

And then there is also the affadavit concerning the Sonderegger book, which contains antisemitic statements.

Here it is:

1. Concerning the wholly false and malicious allegations made by Rene Sonderegger of Zurich, Switzerland, et al., as set forth in the foregoing part of this statement, I, James Paul Warburg, of Greenwich, Connecticut, U.S.A., depose as follows:

2. No such person as
"Sidney Warburg" existed in New
York City in 1933, nor
elsewhere, as far as I know,
then or at any other time.

3. I never gave any manuscript, diary, notes, cables, or any other documents to any person for translation and publication in Holland, and, specifically, I never gave any such documents to the alleged J.G. Shoup of Antwerp. To the best of my knowledge and recollection I never at any time met any such person.

4. The telephone conversation between Roger Baldwin and myself, reported by Sonderegger, never took place at all and is pure invention.

5. I did not go to Germany at the request of the President of the Guaranty Trust Company in 1929, or at any other time.

6. I did go to Germany on business for my own bank, The International Acceptance Bank Inc., of New York, in both 1929 and 1930. On neither of these occasions did I have anything to do with investigating the possible prevention of a Communist revolution in Germany by the promotion of a Nazi counter- revolution. As a matter of recorded fact, my opinion at the time was that there was relatively little danger of a Communist revolution in Germany and a considerable danger of a Nazi seizure of power, I am in a position to prove that, on my return from Germany after the Reichstag elections of 1930, I warned my associates that Hitler would very likely come to power in Germany and that the result would be either a Nazi- dominated Europe or a second world war — perhaps both. This can be corroborated as well as the fact that, as a consequence of my warning, my bank proceeded to reduce its German commitments as rapidly as possible.

7. I had no discussions anywhere, at any time, with Hitler, with any Nazi officials, or with anyone else about providing funds for the Nazi Party. Specifically, I had no dealing of this sort with Mendelssohn & Co., or the Rotterdamsche Bankvereiniging or the Banca Italiana. (The latter is probably meant to read Banca d'Italia, with which I likewise had no such dealings.)

8. In February 1933 (see pages 191 and 192 of Spanischer Sommer) when I am alleged to have brought Hitler the last installment of American funds and to have been received by Goering and Goebbels as well as by Hitler himself, I can prove that I was not in Germany at all. I never set foot in Germany after the Nazis had come to power in January 1933. In January and February I was in New York and Washington, working both with my bank and with President-elect Roosevelt on the then-acute banking crisis. After Mr. Roosevelt's inauguration, on March 3, 1933, I was working with him continuously helping to prepare the agenda for the World Economic Conference, to which I was sent as Financial Adviser in early June. This is a matter of public record.
See Wall Street and FDR, (New York: Arlington House Publishers, 1975), for details of FDR's German associations.

9. The foregoing statements should suffice to demonstrate that the whole "Sidney Warburg" myth and the subsequent spurious identification of myself with the non-existent" Sidney" are fabrications of malicious falsehood without the slightest foundation in truth. >No. James P. Warburg states he has never seen the original "Sidney Warburg" book published in Holland in 1933. Therefore his affidavit only applies to the Sonderegger book which is inaccurate. Sidney Warburg may well be a myth, but the association of Max Warburg and Paul Warburg with I.G. Farben and Hitler is not a myth.

reformed-theology. org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_10.htm

The Warburg kikes can´t be trusted, as James Warburgs subtle lies in this affadavit show. After all they willingly brought debt-slavery to the American people with the FED. The globalist elite of Zionists and their gentile banker friends wanted to clean themselves from all evidence for their involvement in the disaster that was WW2. They needed this massacre of Europeans and the persecution of jews to work towards their globalist goals and to stop nationalism from rising up again by putting fear into the heads of the people. Fear of war and fear of being associated with genocidal "evil nazis".

It does fit right into the narrative of Holla Forums. Once again, the scheming elite used someone as their chess pawn without him even being aware of it. In this case Hitler. Hitler did know that his enemy was this clique of globalist, elitist, international and mostly jewish bankers, but what he didn´t know is that he was doomed to fail from the beginning, because that was their plan for Germany. They started pulling the strings to monger a giant war before he even got elected. It only shows how ruthless and destructive the enemy is and how strong we will have to get if we want to defeat them.

The book is fake and it claims Hitler was funded by gentile bankers, not jews. It doesn't fit anyone's narrative but the Alex Jonesteins of the world.

You haven´t read my posts. You are either a shill or simply an ignorant fool who is assblasted that someone disturbs the peace by pointing out some uncomfortable facts.

You obviously haven't even read the book.

jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Warburg_Hitler's Secret Backers.pdf

The name of the author basically implies that he is a Warburg and therefore in on it. Also, i repeat:
Why would a jew do the dirty work, when he can conspire with his rich gentile friends and servants and let them do it? Of course, jews wouldn´t directly finance Hitler, because they knew how it would look if it came out, as Hitler was a known antisemite since 1920. I.G. Farben greatly funded the Nazis while Max Warburg was a director though, which can be seen as circumstancial evidence, and somehow these jewish bankers also knew that Hitler would be elected 3 years before it happened, as you would know if you had read my posts. This person in the know probably just didn´t have any proof for jewish involvement besides the Warburgs and left it out so people would take it serious and not take it as antisemitic propaganda after the war ended. That´s also the reason why "Sidney Warburg" became a gentile, while everyone knew at which jew the name was hinting.

The Warburgs were neither CEO's nor Presidents at I.G. Farben; but only single board members out of many others. Paul Warburg actually died one year before Hitler was even elected. In short, I.G. Farben backed Hitler in spite of the Warburges, not because of them.

There are too many things that don´t add up for me to not question it. Especially the "marriage cartel" of I.G. Farben with Standard Oil, owned by the Rockefellers, the same bankers "Sydney Warburg" accused of funding Hitler with the aim to create WW2.

Watch the video I posted. You didn't watch it because you responded a mere 30 seconds after me posting it.

Paul Warburg and Max Warburg also had a brother named Fritz Warburg, in Hamburg. The Nazis jailed Fritz Warburg in 1938 on Kristallnacht, then he was released. (Through the help of a Berenberg banker I think.)

There are photos of the Warburgs from a Zionist conference in Berlin in 1936 (so 3 years after Hitler came to power).
objekte.jmberlin.de/object/jmb-obj-147815

I think some less known Warburgs survived through the war in Hamburg, or said to have given escort to Holland. I can't find the source right now.

On a similar note, the Lubavitch Rebbe was escorted out of the Warsaw Ghetto by the Nazis and was shipped to the US in 1939.

If you had come to me before I was political and told me I would come to sympathize with Hitler, then admire him, then think he didn't go far enough, and eventually call him a Zionist shill, I'd call you crazy. This is the best and most bizarre timeline.

quit concern trolling.

The difference is that the US is an indisputable superpower with nuclear weapons. Also jews didn´t infiltrate Hitlers regime because he didn´t allow them to, they did nothing else but financing him because they knew what was coming.
Hitler simply created the most effective state possible and conducted antisemtic policies that were protective of the aryan race, which was his publicly known plan since 1920. Therefore, the Zionists used the opportunity to finance him and monger a giant war against a state that stood for the ultimate enemy of globalists interests: Nationalism and race protectionism. They knew they could abuse Germany under Hitler as the boogeyman for the following century and they knew that their main project, white genocide, would advance massively with the deaths of Europeans in WW2. They are using Hitlers Germany until now, to abolish every kind of nationalism and to manipulate the German people with guilt into opening up to globalism. Do you think Europeans would tolerate this much multiculturalism if WW2 didn´t happen?