Mises Institute Libertarians Arrested in Cuba

mises.org/blog/castro-regime-arrests-member-mises-cuba

This is how the Cuban regime acts, seen in first hand. This is how it has been operating for decades.

I'm so fucking pissed.

How can shitlibs defend a regime that hunts down political dissent with undercover agents?

Why hasn't that leaf cuck with no spine mentioned that Cuba had a thought police for decades? Why did Obama and many other leaders shook hands with Raul Castro?

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/10072567
youtube.com/watch?v=XnPnAJeVuvw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because it's about race to them, first and foremost. Ideology is just a cover or a second concern.

...

Rothbardian anarchists on life support.


Why can't we all just like dissolve the state and rely on contracts to get along, man?

we should be doing this to communists.

...

It's a western value nationalistic institute that got politically hunt down in a country that US is supporting more and more.

Can you stop with "le lolbertarian xD" meme mindset for a while?

kek

The Cubans may be half-caste Commie shitstains, but hey a broken clock is right twice a day. Its a shame they didn't get more of the libertarian shitwads.

Seems like Holla Forums is completely lost in schizo retardness.


What the fuck is wrong with you people?

Does Holla Forums now sides with communist regimes against classical liberals?

What's with all these annoying and unneeded spaces? Have you faggots ever read a book?

Because the Talmudvision and Kikebook didn't tell them to be angry at this

Why would the cultists give a shit if it's not leftists being persecuted? They don't give a fuck about consistent morals or conduct. It's solely about their narrative and how they can gain further power. They'd see this as a good thing, not something to be condemned.

Cuba sucks but the Mises Institute is a bunch of globalist jews and cucked goy so I really don't have a dog in this fight.

No.
Lolbergs are cancer.


AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHA HOLY SHIT YOU ARE FUCKIN RETARDED LAD

The Mises institute aren't classical liberals you fucking spergshit retard. Mises was an Austrian, AKA "the other side of the Jewish coin."

(((Libertarianism))) IS leftism, you fucking dumb cunt

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

- Ludwig von Mises, Human Action, page 87

- Ludwig von Mises, The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science, page 81


Something doesn't add up here chaim.

just consume, goy

Can't even make an argument nor cite anything. Just a bunch of autistic fanatic idiots.


So fucking far-fetched.

Hating Libertarianism = Holla Forums

Listen you fucking retards:

Libertarianism is an extension of (((Enlightenment))) ideals that precipitated the French Revolution and the enshrinement of the Jewish problem all over Europe. Anti-aristocratic ideology is the entire reason that European societies have been utterly subverted and are in precipitous decay.

YOU ARE A LEFTIST. YOU SUPPORT GLOBALIZATION. YOU SUPPORT THE (((FREE MARKET))). YOU ARE TRASH. KILL YOURSELVES.

You lost?

holy shit Jason Unruhe got triggered

This comes from people who do not understand the basics of how economics and trade works. It is a normie-tier political belief.

If globalization is bad, then why are the countries most open to trade so rich, while the countries most closed to trade piss poor? If globalization is bad, then why Hitler got pissed against the boycott from jewish businesses around the globe?

Getting the work that is abundant in other places benefits both you and them. The only reason


And turns out libertarianism are pretty much the only movement alive that can be described as anti-democratic.

You kike worshipers don't and willn't ever have a foothold here. Go shill cuckshan, they love you idiots over there.

I did that in the next post.


Except they're explicitly non-Nationalistic.
Having a flag on the wall means nothing when you're named after a name who outright said "Race, nation, none of that shit matters goyim".

You're just a shitposter, and a faggot.
Stay salty, you autistic liberal.

And the Jew reveals itself.


Top Fucking Kike

Libertarianism is a perversion of the ideology of the founding fathers.

The founding fathers were white nationalists while Libertarians are complete open borders cucks.

Since we're doing this, might as well drop some more anti-lolberg quotes.

- Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism, page 139

- Ludwig von Mises, Omnipotent Government, page 263

- Tom Woods, Liberty and Immigration

- Official Libertarian Political Platform, 2004 election cycle

Ron Paul is Anti-Racist
theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/10072567
Ron Paul: I have always made it clear, and will continue to do so, that my message is based on the rights of all people to be treated equally.
Any type of racism or anti-Semitism is incompatible with my philosophy.
Ludwig von Mises, the great economist whose writing helped inspire my political career, was a Jew who was forced to leave his native Austria to escape the Nazis.
> Therefore, for me to advance anti-Semitism in any way would be a betrayal of my own intellectual heritage.

Yeah thanks for all the advancements in dildo technology and selling out national interests for your own gain you bastard jews.

Seems like 4chan is completely lost to classical liberal retardation (the word you were looking for, but probably didn't know because you're a classically-liberal, underageb& 4channer).

I don't think people here are necessarily excited about the NAP being violated by the Cubans, so much as they just don't care. It's one enemy of ours BTFOing another enemy of ours. We are choosing our battles.

Ron Paul: "Libertarianism is the enemy of all racism"

youtube.com/watch?v=XnPnAJeVuvw (Ron Paul: "Libertarianism is the enemy of all racism")

"Libertarian is the enemy of all racism, because racism is a collectivist idea. Its that, you put people in category, you say "Well blacks belong here, and whites here, and women here", but we don't see people in forms, or, uh, or gays, you don't have rights because you're gays or women or minority, you have rights because you're an individual. So we see people strictly as individuals, and we get these individuals in a natural way, so its exactly opposite of all collectivism, and its absolutely anti-racism, because we don't see it in those terms."

Ron Paul: Immigration not solved by barbed wire, guns
theguardian.com/world/feedarticle/10072567

Also:
DAILY REMINDER

lolbergs are the most stunted of ideological stances, espousing awareness of only 1 of Haidt's six(+) moral foundations.

If liberals are equivalent to humans attempting to perceive UV light without technological assistance, libertarians are equivalent to blind humans attempting to perceive visible light in similar context.
IOW: lolbersteinism is ideological trash for autistic liberals, the only liberals worse than actual liberals.

That all sounds very familiar

And nothing of value was lost

Dude, halfchan is utter trash at this point.
I spent some time there recently for the HWNDU threads, and holy shit son, its a god damned mess.

At least one of their moderators is a legit ancap, and its hilarious watching them get into spats over how retarded their fantasy - borne of their failure to understand others around them, to understand they are alone in their autistic liberalism - only to get BTFO and eventually do a final insult-ridden shitpost before closing the thread.

Its just sad.

Hahaha, oh wow, okay, now call us SJWs.

I love how they just can't take it. I'm actually surprised at how quickly you guys managed to turn him from
to have him shed his mask and say
I thought it would be harder, but they just don't even try it seems.

Who's shilling Flat Earth theory here? Not making much sense there, heebie kikeberger.

We deal with autistic communists and autistic nationalists and autistic everything basically all day.
When its just autistic liberal, its almost too easy.

I can see you're from here, fellow polster. You should read some Hoppe, he's blaming the french revolution, democracy and multiculturalism for most of today's ills just as some of you do. Gary Johnson and Ancap facebook kiddies are not libertarians.

Yeah, their catalog has looked like this for at least a year:

Literally no arguments.

I wrote that if globalization is bad, then why did Germany got bothered for being blocked from global trade?

And he was absolutely right. Other countries closing the trade with Germany is what made Germany go into war.

Are you implying that Bastiat is also a jew anti-white globalist?


Except Tom Woods also mentions the libertarain case AGAINST immigration in many of his work. As if this one citation of what open borders could mean somehow gives him an absolute position.

Rothbard also mentioned that blocking people in borders was difficult to morally justify, yet he was avidly AGAINST open immigration.


LITERALLY 99.99% OF POLITICAL MOVEMENTS ARE NOT RACIALLY MOTIVATED. You turbo autistic fuck. Maybe if you could only pay attention to what I'm writing you would understand why the NatSoc fanaticism fucked itself up. You are literally hostilizing every possible ally and turning 90% of the political spectrum against yourself.

We can thank NatSocs for making white pride a taboo for the next 100 years. The allegedly pro white movement that murdered whites by the millions and made the entire planet more left leaning.

But she is, most of you guys are absolutely infatuated with her and Kyle, it's difficult to watch without cringing. 8/pol/ in 2017 is literally Renegade's bitch.

AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Dude, seriously, go back to cuckchan.

The fact that we share some perspectives on a matter does not suggest we are allies or even have much of anything of any value in common.
And what's more, if the lolbergs blame today's ills on multiculturalism, why were they campaigning for abolishing borders in 2004?
Borders inherently violate the NAP by the reasoning and argumentation of several highly-respected and widely-touted lolberstein figureheads.

Again, something doesn't add up here chaim.
Besides, you already argued that globalism is good, you're fucking trash son.
Only when you grow up and realize Duty > Liberty, will you be of any use… But you probably never will grow up, because you have autism.

Pfffthahahahahahahahhahaha.


Well, yeah, its really sad - they've convinced themselves (thanks to mods constantly posting the same tired bait threads over and over to try to make it appear to have more traffic than it does) that the only way to have discussion is via bait, or rather, the only way you'll get any response at all is if you make the entirety of your post pure bait and respond only with bait.

And with the flag shit, it ends up just devolving into people shit-talking each other based on the nation in which the proxy they're using is stationed.

Because kikes declared economic war on them and tried to fuck them over for not being globalist puppets. Also don't forget that post-war reparation Germany flourished under National Socialist economics, while the USA was in the Great Depression :^) .

Also
Go consume more you fat fucking kike.

Good argument

Literally arguing in favor of globalism.
If you think I'm going to sit here and explain to your autistic ass why that's retarded, and hilarious of you to be presenting it here, you really are autistic as fuck.

The rest of your post is just culture of critique-tier deconstruction and, as you've already revealed yourself as a slimey disingenuous kike, I'm not inclined to acquiesce to your autist desire to sit here sperging for the next three hours, so I'm just going to point and laugh at you.

You can't see the pointing, but know that I am doing it.
Here comes the laughter.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Must be a cuckchan thing lad.
You have to go back.

If you're going to pretend you're from here this isn't how you show it.

...

You're part of the "we have to dox everyone" crew, aren't you?

Nah, but I applaud their efforts.
There is nobody they have doxxed that wasn't revealed to be a complete piece of shit.

You're a TRS fag too, huh?
Go back to your forums and circle-jerk some more as your following continues to dwindle due to the revelation that the organization was founded by a fat childless New York City lolberg Jew.

It's probably Kike Eunuch.

I can smell the matzos from here

No, but you're one of those that call everyone trssodomites and turned this place into absolute shit

[Citation Needed]


I've often wondered what kind of people I see on YT commenting that Hitler is at fault for the things Merkel does. Thanks to you, I now know it's libertarians making such arguments.

Your wife started cooking early?

You didn't even capitalize it, you didn't even fucking TRY to blend in.

Wouldn't surprise me.
They've been desperate to get a foothold here, and then it was revealed that Holla Forums was 100% correct in their criticisms.

It was honestly funny as shit, and continues to be.


Yeah, you're a TRS guy alright.
Haha, how's it feel to know you got played like a fucking fiddle?
I bet it doesn't feel good.

It feels great on my end tbh fam.

Implying what? That you're brain damaged?

It's one "s" and TRS is capitalized: TRSodomite.

You didn't quite congruently answer the question. If NatSocs are against globalization, then what's the problem of being kept away from globalized trade? Where's the consistency here?


If the raw wealth a nation can make for itself and its citizens is not a measure of success, I honestly don't know what is. Plus, if that's true, then why did Germany got mad for getting trade sanctions and getting less capital? I thought that was not a good measurement of success.

All this NatSoc autism has zero congruence,and is built solely on buzzwords without true meaning.

STOP

SPACING

LIKE

THIS

*preventing international finance from being threatened

Nigger tier zing, congratulations.


That's definitely that same handful of Sinead's bootlickers again

I don't feel it at all. You're the former goon that bragged about "redpilling" 12 year olds on a flash movie platform, arent you? That's the most autistic shit I've read in years fam.

Their continued existence, you incredibly Jewish autistic faggot.
A nation is a thing of blood, not ideals, and when the blood runs thin, the nation does as well - when its replaced entire, the nation ceases to exist. No amount of material wealth changes that.
This is why you fail.

OP pretending this is a nationalist organization when it is an internationalist one, the kind that involves (((human right activism))).
They claim to be libertarian but in the "ukraine" there are fake natscos ought to kill White separatists for the sake of the NWO.

Cuban authorities did nothing wrong, agents serving a (((hostile foreign power))) should indeed be arrested instead of being allowed to preach in schools and universities, allowed be judges, mayors and politicians.

Nice try, Shlomo.

You seem to be conflating "globalism" with "international trade".
It's the equivalent of you saying that I practice communalism because I shop at my local supermarket.

Watching you squirm…. Its just so good.
You will never be accepted here.

This, read the /lit/ Spengler thread you fucking newfag Lolbergs

I don't have the link on me, maybe some user can provide it

Still waiting for proof that we are "Sinead's bootlickers."

Do you… not have any?

Wishful thinking tbh
I know that's hard to grasp for you but nobody in the right mind cares for acceptance on taiwanese mouth harping forums

What kind of proof? Threads that aren't accessible anymore? Kill yourself.

...

That should be TRS' new slogan.

Yep, you're a sodomite alright.

Kek, I don't even visit that site

Here's the thing…

Why does TRS hates Sinead, thought?

A political speech is not an absolute insight on the truth.


All sides do propaganda. There's a reason why anti-nazi propaganda was more effective. Nazis were the enemy, and they lost, so they didn't write the history.

If NatSocs were not fanatics and WWII still took place, it would be a war between individualists and nationalists against marxism. It would have been a completely different scenario. It would be the total destruction of marxism, and through propaganda, the banishment of marxism for the next 200 years.

Kids would be thought in school how marxism is bad.
Why pride would not be a taboo
Nationalism would not be a taboo
South America, Cuba, Asia, would not be riddled with marxist

Instead, now we live in a reality where communists were the victors.

Kek, I don't even visit that site. Two can play at that game.

Checked for TRS BTFO in 100-120 characters or less, and the next thread you find maybe 1 or 2 coherent arguments.

So what you're saying is lolbergs shit the bed again.

I think we're done here.

Probably a competing wing of controlled-op trash.

The Jew has its hand-puppets pretend to fight so they appear to be different, to appeal to different audiences.

Germany had been recovering from some of the harshest economic conditions out there at the time, they had been on a bad path for decades (due mostly to democracy - like we are now, go figure). They hadn't nearly enough time to become as self-sufficient as they should have been. Also you can still trade and not be a globalist scumfucker.

Capital is a measure, not THE measure. It shows how autistically simple-minded and secular you are. Even if you don't know it, I bet you are a kike. You can't become NatSoc, just realize you have always been one. National Socialism is about preserving and growing the most beautiful in humanity and nature - and that isn't just wealth of capital, it is about wealth of spirit. It is about the working class pulling themselves up from groveling husks of monotony to the quintessential Übermensch. It is about becoming the best you can for the sake of your people, it is about making men into gods. You can never achieve that if you are motivated solely by greed. Self-sacrifice is the highest and most noble of human ideals.

All morality derives from duty, which is to group as self-interest is to the individual.

Liberty is freedom from (perceived unjustified) obligation.
Duty is inherent, inescapable obligation.

This is why they fail…. Well, that and their special blend of autism doesn't allow them to functionally empathize with others, so they don't understand why everyone doesn't think or behave like them.

From what i heard she was on some TRSodomite podcast some time ago and refused to adopt the alt-right label. I'm not sure if that's the extent of it or if there is more to it, I've tried to find that podcast episode once but can't find it.

And did I use "the measure" or "a measure"? Nice backtracking.

Anyway, I hope you at least realize that "globalization" is a buzzword with no meaning with this discussion.

...

Except I didn't use "buzzword" as a buzzword. I pointed out that there's absolute no congruence nor meaning whatsoever with the term "globalization". And whoever I was talking with failed to address that.

stay btfo

WTF is Mises doing in Cuba?
Arrested? Good.

Yeah, that's nice, but you also tried to disingenuously pretend you were using "a measure" in the context of discussion, when you'd clearly implied that it was "the measure", in that you implied that if it was not THE measure then you could not perceive what a measure would even be, in the context provided.

And you did totally use it as a buzzword, and have already done so in this thread.

I'd rather be poor and walled in with my own kind than swim in the brown hordes of (((globalization)))
kike

Typical jewish pilpul, everybody.

That is literally the basis of the libertarianism, Austrian economics, and the Mises institute, you fucking kike.
Wrong answer. You started a thread under the guise that the Mises institute was nationalistic and worth defending. The Mises institute is antithetical to the values this board professes because globalism is in direct opposition to the agenda of National Socialists. Globalism is the death of our people, culture, and values which is bad for us us. Enlightenment thought leads to the inevitable conclusion that borders are bad. Gas yourself you semantics abusing kike.

No one cares.

>>>/liberty/

Checked for lolbergs cannot - not do not, CAN NOT - apply value to ethnicity/race and so do not perceive how others can do so, thus inherently restricting their capacity for discourse.

Even liberals have greater capacity in this regard.

And with that, /thread.

Close window, we're done here.

If every single nigger, kike, etc., was killed with bioweapons, would libertarianism become a reasonable ideology?

No it isn't you fucking idiot. What part of classical liberalism or austrian economics say that "the well being of a nation is only measured in terms of money"? Are you going to start manufacturing strawmen just to cover up the fact that you were wrong?

Yet, you couldn't actually explain what globalization is with non-vague terms.

Literally info-wars tier buzzword. Go read a book, go learn real principles that you can actually define and debate.

I'll ask again just to trigger you. If "globalism is in direct opposition to the agenda of National Socialists" then why did NatSocs got absolutely pissed for being blocked in the global trade scenario? Why they didn't like being economically isolated?

The Allies would have still fought them. Hitler wanted to ally with the British Empire, and offered them numerous peace deals, as he perceived the USA and USSR to be the real threats. Churchill refused every one.

The reason why the Germans made such a big deal of the Katyn massacre is because they hoped the west would drop the war, and help against the Soviets (except the Western media just blamed Germany for it). Right to the very end, Goebbels and the rest believed the Allied coalition would dissolve, but it didn't. When the war was over, communists were allowed to run free, and take territory at a gobsmacking rate. The British wanted to stop it, but Washington wouldn't act. The US also intentionally cucked itself in Korea, resulting in a draw, rather than a victory. Patton wanted to fight the communists, but died mysteriously after the war was over. MacArthur wanted to win in Korea, and was removed from command for his trouble.

Hitler didn't do those things. He died decades ago. The noble and heroic allies were willing to sacrifice every goy they could if it meant stoppping fascism, but sat in the corner and watched while China and Eastern Europe fell to communism. Had the west simply let Germany and Japan do their thing, communism would have been destroyed, and kids would be taught it was bad.

Oil embargo, asset freezing, supporting enemy nations, Hull note… Japan was clearly targeted for destruction by the Allies. look what happened to Asia after they were defeated.

In other words, if your enemy is communism, and you blame "fanatics" for failing to stop communism, it is the Allies you should be blaming, not the Axis.

You're lying, fuckoff

Fuck, It was meant for

To


Wait, I clearly implied something I wrote the exact opposite of? Holy shit you are so fucking retarded.


Turbo autismo.

>>>/liberty/48594

Even your own think you're a shithead.

Thanx!

A mostly white germanic country as the real threat, because muh JEWSSS.

Also, look up the "generous" peace deals yourself. Those were THREATS, not peace fucking deals. Hitler before the war asking them to not grow their armies, and if they did so Germany would not go to war. A peace offer before any war push is a fucking threat, not an actual peace offer.

I hope the commies gas the fucking kikes.

I was trying to cover a lot of points there, and it came out as sort of a mess, so I'll simplify:

Your argument:

My argument:

And I think the facts speak for themselves:


I'm talking peace offers during the war, fag.
Oh, nevermind. Looks like I'm wasting my time.

Are you telling me that a violation of Laissez-faire economics, doesn't violate libertarian values? Are you telling me that a breach of Laissez-faire economics would not be a breach of that "liberty" that your kind always spouts off about? Are you telling me that you actually value something more than capital? Do tell. Remember your version of "liberty" is heavily tied in with capital. What arguments have you even made this thread besides capital related ones? I haven't heard one except "lol Germany sux, buzzwords xDD".

Globalization is the opening of borders, and destruction of the nation-state. It is policies that don't allow the self-determination of a self-identified group or nation like, one-size-fits-all culture, and the arrestment of sovereignty of a nation or race, to the world at large. It is believing in "equality" for all people regardless of nation or race. What were those values of the French revolution again? (Equality was in there, bud)

Economics is a secondary concern for the National Socialist. To a National Socialist, the most important thing is your people. Things are only considered in terms of that. Did it help the people or hurt them? If it is beneficial to economically isolate yourself as a National Socialist in the current economic climate, the proper National Socialist would do just that. If trade was more beneficial to the people at that time, they would instead trade. [citation needed] for your claim that they "got absolutely pissed for being blocked in the global trade scenario". I am sure they weren't happy about it but I doubt they were that pissed about it. And once again, a point you chose to ignore, globalization != international trade.

There is no economic sacrifice too great, if it benefits the people.

Send threats to the british in form of peace offers saying "stop growing your army and we won't attack you".

Eventually the war starts and they attack each other.

Then the "generous" peace offer during the war: "Turn the coats on the soviets and let us invade them and we won't attack you". Gee, I wonder why Churchill didn't instantly backtrack previous deals with half the planet to side with Germany there.

What about their military policy of no retreat from gained ground? Did the jews force them to adopt that too? Were Germans really so cornered they couldn't just protect their borders? Did they had to literally go all the way to Stalingrad and attempt to conquer the entire Euroasia because the jews forced them to?

It was all a complete fuck up out of fanaticism. Everything could have gone spectacularly different with a slightly different attitude from Germany.

Do you remember when you started this thread and were pretending NOT to be a globalist shill?

I remember OP from an earlier thread where he admitted he was a shitskin Cuban. Don't give this fuck the time of day.

How can you not fathom that natsoc and cultural monolithicism is precisely "one-size-fits-all" within a group? And I'm not even saying anything of that is good or bad, I'm saying you have no congruence with your own terms.

So, now the term "globalists" mean people who are against self-determination, except libertarians are not against self-determination, they are in favor of it, and they sure as fuck not in favor of anything that can be categorized as a "one-size-fits-all", so according to your own definition, libertarians are not globalists?

So, If I'm against open borders, in favor of a nation-state, against policies that don't allow the self-determination of a self-identified group, I'm still a globalist, because I'm a libertarian. Open your fucking eyes. This is just a retarded buzzword to throw at anything you are either too scared or stupid to discuss. See , it's just a mind shutting mechanism.


So, if open borders and interactions with other cultures benefits them, they'll want open borders? So NatSocs can be filthy globalist jews too?


Do you even history you mongol?


The difference between economic well being and personal human well being is rarely, rarely, detached, and when so, it is at a very tiny amount. If you are doing economical sacrifices, you'll almost always be hitting things that benefit people by default.

I bet they were trying to buy some child prostitutes in typical lolbertarian fashion. Hey fellow goyim kids are property you can let them starve to death or sell them to a jewish pedo ring to be sexually exploited!!!!

Lolbergtardianism is just as repugnant of an ideology as communism

I meant see: , not

...

No, it means you're not Libertarian at all because you don't seem to understand what words mean.

No, they weren't forced to do that, and nowhere did I suggest they were. But on the other hand,
If you exclude the Danzig corridor, they possibly could have, but the Soviets were going to push into Eastern Europe in a few years anyway, and were in the process of modernizing their military (equipping more soldiers more automatic rifles and submachine guns, more effective than bolt-actions, especially when you barely train your troops), so the USSR was going to get stronger, and was going to get more and more aggressive in the coming years. So, a war with them was inevitable. A war with Britain and America maybe not, depending on who was in power, but Churchill and FDR were awfully eager.

Bear in mind that Germany and Japan had nowhere near enough oil available to sustain conflicts with USSR/China, and when your have Hooton-plan, "Judeah declares war on Germany" tier people in charge of the resource-rich countries, you are at their mercy, surely you can see how Hitler wouldn't want to be in such a situation.

Anyway, I actually do agree that Hitler may have been too aggressive, not that you won't just keep strawmanning me as someone who thinks Hitler made perfect decisions all the time, but your belief that the Axis were at fault for the state of the world today (the whole reason you and I are arguing right now) is disingenuous.

Hey, if you are still in the thread, can you answer a question for me, without looking it up?
Why did Hitler invade Denmark and Norway?

There is some uniformity to it, but not completely. Also, you are bringing no supporting evidence.

Libertarians are, and always have been for capital and liberty. Capitalism is against the group in the long term because everything becomes bought and paid for, and hyper-individualism, aka hyper-liberty becomes anti-group over time. Libertarians don't value group self-determination, or borders, thus globalist. Capital and individual wins out over the well-being of the group.

If you are for all of those things together you aren't a proper libertarian, perhaps a constitutionalist - which isn't necessarily globalist, but it is still detrimental to the people in the long term.

Open borders would be the death of their people, and culture, so that would never be in their benefit, especially in the Germanic/Nordicist/Aryanism variety, because that is marked by a healthy sense of racial pride and a feeling of superiority.

[citation needed], you are pretending like they are absolutely devastated even though I guarantee that their end goal was to make a self-sufficient Germany.

Wrong, if you don't see the material wealth we have today, and the contrasting spiritual poverty we are struck with you are hopeless.

On that note I am going to bed. You argue dishonestly and fortunately for me, you are in a place that everyone can see past it and I don't have to keep engaging you. Enjoy your materialism kike. The funny part is it will eat you apart from the inside and you will be left with nothing but hedonism and self-indulgence, those are the fruits of your ideals.

Not sure if he'll respond, and the thread seems dead, so I'll answer the question and be on my way.
Germany was reliant on Swedish metal, pretty much all of which made it to Germany via the port of Narvik. Britannia ruled the waves, and was still a dominant military, economic, and diplomatic power, that could easily (and in several different ways) prevent the ore from ever making it to Germany. If that happened, no more panzers. Not good, when you're in a world war.

Literally just a jump-off point for Norway.

Such is the case with many of Hitler's instances of aggression. He was trapped in a world war that was never going to end until one side definitively won. He had to either surrender unconditionally, or keep escalating the conflict in hopes of eventually securing victory. Japan was in a similar pickle. The British and Americans had whole continents to pull resources from, and they didn't have home turf lost to Versailles, so of course they didn't invade every little country in the 30s and 40s. Hiler's aggression wasn't a matter of fanaticism, it was a matter of necessity.

He failed, but not for lack of trying, this is why we respect him.

PHYSICAL REMOVAL BABY!

-t. fag who only came here after Holla Forums harbor