Why does Holla Forums get so triggered by the fact that people generally have a tendency to prefer the company of those...

Why does Holla Forums get so triggered by the fact that people generally have a tendency to prefer the company of those with a similar ethnicity and culture of their own? Why is communism necessarily at odds with this in the first place (or is it)?

It's usually rootless American cosmopolitans and mutts who do not understand what ethnic solidarity means because they never had it with other Americans. There much more of that in rest of the world, however.

I recognize that most people tend to be that way. It's fucking stupid and spooky as fuck, but I understand it and don't harshly judge anyone for it.

Fat bearded pig of slovenian sexism explains:

The first thing to note here is that transgenderism goes together with the general tendency in today’s predominant ideology to reject any particular “belonging” and to celebrate the “fluidification” of all forms of identity. Thinkers like Frederic Lordon have recently demonstrated the inconsistency of “cosmopolitan” anti-nationalist intellectuals who advocate “liberation from a belonging” and in extremis tend to dismiss every search for roots and every attachment to a particular ethnic or cultural identity as an almost proto-Fascist stance. Lordon contrasts this hidden belonging of self-proclaimed rootless universalists with the nightmarish reality of refugees and illegal immigrants who, deprived of basic rights, desperately search for some kind of belonging (like a new citizenship). Lordon is quite right here: it is easy to see how the “cosmopolitan” intellectual elites despising local people who cling to their roots belong to their own quite exclusive circles of rootless elites, how their cosmopolitan rootlessness is the marker of a deep and strong belonging. This is why it is an utter obscenity to put together elite “nomads” flying around the world and refugees desperately searching for a safe place where they would belong–the same obscenity as that of putting together a dieting upper-class Western woman and a starving refugee woman.

Furthermore, we encounter here the old paradox: the more marginal and excluded one is, the more one is allowed to assert one’s ethnic identity and exclusive way of life. This is how the politically correct landscape is structured. People far from the Western world are allowed to fully assert their particular ethnic identity without being proclaimed essentialist racist identitarians (native Americans, blacks…). The closer one gets to the notorious white heterosexual males, the more excellent this assertion is: Asians are still OK; Italians and Irish – maybe; with Germans and Scandinavians it is already excellent… However, such a prohibition on asserting the particular identity of white men (as the model of oppression of others), although it presents itself as the admission of their guilt, nonetheless confers on them a central position. This very prohibition makes them into the universal-neutral medium, the place from which the truth about the others’ oppression is accessible. The imbalance weighs also in the opposite direction: impoverished European countries expect the developed West European ones to bear the full burden of multicultural openness, while they can afford patriotism.

some things are destined to remain mysteries

...

Communism is not at odds with the feeling of ethnic pride and ethnic cohesion. North Korea, China, and the USSR were socialist countries where the populations all felt drawn to their own national cultures. What isn't allowed, however, is the predatory nationalism and capitalism that make one ethnic group the servants of another ethnic group. Beyond that I think people should just be free to associate with whoever they want, and usually that means associating with people from the same ethic or cultural background.

Culture is part of ethnicity.


Just sayin.


stop
they are far too large for a cohesive ethnic identity


wewewew lad

Fucking spook thread tbh

lol no

My best friend in highschool was from Albania.
I didn't even know he was not Greek.

Did it matter?
Why does pol get so fixated on ethnicity and "culture", when it only matter when you want to belong?
And, why not belong in the communist party? Being a comrade renders all other spooks obsolete.

Stirner approves of this carefull correct statement.

And they were the first spacefaring nation in history.

Personal feelings do not belong in politics.

You have you're own safe space, it's called Holla Forums now fuck off and go back there

Cuz people here are so sick of Holla Forums spamming

I'm guessing it depends on the individual. can you bring us a research about this?

Marx never said "Hate your race".

Read it in his voice and his dramatic pauses in my head.
Ideology flows through me, I cannot be saved.

they had a soviet culture, and national sub-cultures. More than hundred of them btw.

We don't care faggot. It's when people start doing spooky shit because of muh race and muh culture.

"I don't like your example and they are mean so I won't discuss it"


Except that the different ethnic groups had their own republics and civic nationalism held them together, along with economic ties. Your point?

Mentioning le Max Stirner is a telltale sign you are a moron.

There was only Russian 'nationalism' in different forms. In Tzarist Russia everyone was Russian (i.e. russian-speaking and orthodox), in USSR everyone was a soviet man (i.e. russian speaking atheist). And now local ethnicities don't have their civic nationalism except Tatars and Caucasian people. You either part of Russian Imperial identity in Russia or you will have problems.

sick meme

Pic related. You're doing the exact same thing the feminists do when they say things like

5 minutes later you'll be saying that you want to forcibly exile everyone with the wrong skin color and sterilize niggers so they stop "anuddah shoah".

Now kindly fuck off.

Do you have any real case for ethnic identity being meaningless, or do you just repeat "spook, spook" and hope it goes away?

People living among the same race is simply a historical artefact of people living among the same culture due to past multicultural societies having very distinct cultures for every race

This is diminishing now in more egalitarian societies. For example, I am white, and I would consider my non-white college buddies basically the same culture as me (in the US)

...

*feminism

I prefer hanging out with black and Asian people tbh, white people suck tbh

Ethnicity is socially constructed and spooky as all fuck. Preference for one's own race is a product of culture usually. People who grow up in diverse environments tend to give zero fucks about people of different races. Culture is another matter. It's a common language more or less. People prefer their own culture because it's less effort than figuring out how to bridge a cultural divide.

Who says it's a monolith? He's just pointing out that you can find feminists engaging in that behavior too.

Feminism is a meaningless word, as proven by that picture. The only monolithic thing about feminists is that they're all stupid enough to label themselves using a word which has an even broader meaning than "socialism".