Being loyal to a race

...

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/tens-millions-worlds-biggest-strike-india-battle-higher-wages-narendra-modi-a7224061.html?amp?client=ms-android-americamovil-us
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

daily reminder Holla Forums is full of faggots

Yeah that's cool and all, but do you ever notice it's always a white guy saying shit like that, while the rest of the world is extremely ethnocentric and tribalistic? Like, what's up with that? Really makes you think!

Non European women are ikky and non-white men smell bad.

It's also the case in your country

It's the case in every country. Majortiy of the people do not support their race, ethnicity, language, tradition, customs and folklore be wiped out for some kind of communist utopia. This is what you got wrong and you really need to work around this to achive your ideal society, or else the next revolution will be a mess just like the october revolution only got to stage of state capitalism and communism.

Enjoy being steamrolled by everyone else who does.

swearing fealty to a ghost is about the most spooktackular thing I can think of

This seems a very odd thing to blame on a future communism when it's happening right now under capitalism.

No one said anything about ghosts, faggot. I said identify with, not worship. I know how my father, grandfather and great grandfather lived and they knew how theirs did and so on.

If loyalty is arbitrary why should I be disloyal? Does being disloyal in any way benefit me, or is there utility in banding together and fucking over others with whom you haven't banded together?

It's almost as if there's some utility to tribalism.

virgin detected

Virginity should not be seen as negative trait, rather it should be ignored.
This bourgeois cultural hegemony along cultural norms that have been influencing western culture since 60`s are full of fun stuff.

Sex is not commodity, nor thing that you should have with strangers or people who you barely know.
Sex is thing that should be ideally reserved between lovers, to strenghten their relationship, an intimacy shared by only them. Also, all research indicates that sex does help in emotional bonding with person you´re having it with.

All of you sick fucks who still support this cesspool culture of "sexual liberation" set forward in this capitalist society to make it commodity and norm make me sick.

Our modern culture in this regard is destructive both for mind and spirit of my fellow men out there.

This culture that is fed to masses by capitalist class via mass media and mainstream culture is destroying our views on sex and society.

There should be no reason to tolerate this degenerated culture and not to strike against it via counter culture.

>>>Holla Forums

...

...

Isn't it quite bourgeois to be a rootless cosmopolitan who has a 'citizen of the world' identity. At least that's how it was in the Soviet Union.

I always took "The working men have no country" in reference to the bourgeois nation state not that people should be indifferent to where they come from.

No, I think this is quite a noble goal. Nationalism or any kind of [i was born here]ism is only valid in reaction to an outside [arbitrary ingroup]ist force oppressing you. The goal is to have a global socialist society, where all workers are workers of the socialist society, who just happened to be born somewhere.

most people are pretty fucking spooked.

Without nationalism we'll all be amalgamated into a monocultural gray race. Given westerns are a global minority this monoculture will not be based on western values. Can you honestly say you'd be happy living in a muzlamic or Chinese world? Honestly if you don't value western tradition and values then fuck of and join ISIS. You'll save yourself a lot of hassle down the line.

Westerners may be a minority but our culture is already the most dominant one there is. Also you can support western enlightenment ideals without constantly being all "hurt durr [insert country] strong!"

You don't seem to know about the base and the superstructure.

The culture we live in is largely a result of the material conditions of our society. If the world industrializes, the culture will change itself to fit the new material conditions. Since industrialisation requires emphasis on sciences, society will be more focussed on sciences, religion will decline, feudal systems must be abolishes to fit the capitalist system. Western values did not exist until they developed recently. Humanist values are a result of the overthrow of the feudal state due to its internal contradictions, "democracy" did not develop until the industrial revolution when cities and faster communication and travel facilitated the organisation of the working class.

The same will happen with socialism. Religious theocracy can not exist within an industrial or post-industrial society. Also


Look at japan in the Meiji period. In order to move from a feudal society to a modern society, it was forced to adopt western values, cultural habits and governmental structures.

But you think that a global homogenous society means "we will put open the borders right here and now and abolish all government and let ISIS murder everyone and establish a kaliphate". Small tip, you cannot have a global society with groups that are outright nationalist or tribal, so they will have to be reformed before being able to join. Most of the modern western world and even the "second" world is pretty much the same by now, save for a bit of superficial shit like language, looks and which sky creature they casually pray to. These superficial cultural differences hardly have a significance compared to the vast shared culture between them, mostly based on enlightenment and (as of now) capitalist values.

Only america and perhaps england is.

We also know which part of the political spectrum is pushing it. It's not hard to remember the names of journalists, political activists, oragnizations and politicians.

Why?

They are ruthless towards animals.
They are ruthless towards eachother.
They are ruthless towards the environment.
They are ruthless towards themselves.
They are ruthless towards foreigners.

This. They're part of liberal media machine.

being loyal to an ideology

What does Angry Cat flag represent? o_o

Sabo-Tabby. Meant to suggest wildcat strikes, sabotage, and radical unionism.

I only learned about this now. Thanks for sharing!

...

this is why reactionaries make sense to common people nowdays

They're absolutely spooked. Killing them would be doing them a favor so they can become spooks too and join all the other pointless bullshit floating around that doesn't matter.

ITT: Everything I don't like is a spook.

Sounds like general humans.

Iran, Saudi the gulf monarchies. These are all industrial societies. And Islam isn't going anywhere there. In hyper-industrial east Asia Islam is growing. Hell it's the fastest growing religion in the post industrial west. The idea that they'll grow out of it is wearing thin.


The Chinese are inhuman with zero empathy. Arguably the cultural revolution saw to that but I'd still rather them than the mullahs.


Yeah these 'superficial differences' are one of the motivations behind the rise of islamism. Burying your head in the sand and saying they'll grow out of it is ignoring reality.


I fucking wish. Instead {{{they}}} are selling out the nation and it's people to arab and chinese billionaires.

Because nations and "races" are just bullshit made up by aristocrats and the wealthy in order to get the poors to fight for them. They're insubstantial and absolutely meaningless and even a cursory glance at history shows you that questions of identity are constantly shifting and evolving so trying to "preserve your culture" or "preserve your race" aren't just backwards and stupid but completely impossible, since these cultural elements arose out of now defunct modes of production and social organization.

So one of the goals of socialism is to erase these petty and false distinctions that only exist to enrich a very few at the expense of the whole and stand resolutely in the way of compromise, collaboration, and progress.

He's right. We need to put the micks in their place and put a stop to their cultural Hibernianism.

They are an oil state, they make their money from lucky oil, nor working in industry.

k

Can you not read?

As opposed to white billionaires?

No, you see, if our ruling class was made up entirely of white billionaires, our lives would be better, because they would curb fun stuff and ensure that all whites enjoyed a high standard of living, for the good of the Volk.

:^)

I'll give you Saudi. But Iran is a fairly developed country. East asia is industried out its tits. And in east asia Islam is growing. Even in China it is getting big.

Well yes tbh I would rather they were 'my' billionaires than someone who stands against much of what I consider worthwhile in the west.

lol

"white" aristocrats ruled over "white" serfs and they didn't think any more of squashing you into the dirt than the billionaires will

this is why you shouldn't let yourself be possessed by memes and spooks, it makes you retarded

I'm not the guy you replied to but you convicned me
GAS THE BILLIONAIRES, WEALTH DISTRIBUTION NOW

Has it ever occurred to you that the ruling class views proletarians in the same way and can use exactly the same argument against you?

What about jews? Jews by Holla Forums standards and their achievements as a race are objectively Ubermensch.

Here's the thing, facists do not care if they're being ruled over by someone. They're not right wing liberatarian fedora tippers who masturbate over importance of individuality. You won't convince him that way.
What fascist want is strong cohesive community and class cooperation. They see outside interferance as a problem to their cohesiveness since it might disrupt their "way of life" or something like that. This has nothing to do with hierarchies at all.

The jews are neither the smartest, nor the strongest, nor the most numerous.

They only survive as long as there are a strong body for them to suck blood.

And whine about it, the ungrateful bastards.

...

That's why they disproportionately represent the vast majority of nobel laureates despite having a minuscule population, and the vast majority of contemporary mathematicians and scientists are all jews?

actually…

The Nobel Prize, Fields Medal, etc. are all Jewish awards that will never be given to deserving Aryans.
:^)

Typical. Go way of topic to avoid the harsh truth that Islam is a domineering ideology and incompatible with the west. Cause to acknowledge this blatantly obvious fact would mean you having to accept nationalism as a sensible defense against it.

oi cunt, perhaps you should read what we say instead of sperging out about islam. Nobody here is saying isis is compatible with globalism. We say nationalism and ethno-centrism is not compatible, and most of the islamic world is that.

tl;dr you are fucking retarded, kill yourself or make yourself usefull and join the army and go kill ISIS, the cause of the refugees, while we attack the system that resulted into the instability that caused ISIS.

...

The cheapest form of pride however is national pride. For it betrays in the one thus afflicted the lack of individual qualities of which he could be proud, while he would not otherwise reach for what he shares with so many millions. He who possesses significant personal merits will rather recognise the defects of his own nation, as he has them constantly before his eyes, most clearly. But that poor beggar who has nothing in the world of which he can be proud, latches onto the last means of being proud, the nation to which he belongs to. Thus he recovers and is now in gratitude ready to defend with hands and feet all errors and follies which are its own.

meanwhile Mohammad has fucked your sister and you're now uncle to three little future terrorists. Only they're no longer terrorists cause they are the majority.

What about nationalism as a self defense mechanism from {{{them}}} and {{{them}}}?

in postmodernism people associate according to their beliefs and hobbies, not according to their nationality

Why should I care who my sister has sex with?


There is no self defense from the micks, boyo.

Read a fucking book, you dip

Still waiting on your glorious revolution? pro-tip. Not going to happen. So that leaves 'wait until capitalism collapses. Enjoy the wait.

How do we stop this meme?

I don't think people evolve that quickly, they just had very high concentrations of wealth thanks to being involved in usury which let them become more educated than the rabble.

Don't you know? If you don't fuck your female relatives, you're being cucked.

Tell that to a lot of posses of pajeets.

google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/tens-millions-worlds-biggest-strike-india-battle-higher-wages-narendra-modi-a7224061.html?amp?client=ms-android-americamovil-us

Suddenly everything about Holla Forums makes sense

I wish them well. But don't expect to see that in the west any time soon.

Thing have to get worse before they get better.

You are right, but thats not an argument againsts communism. I'm very pessimistic about our ability to have a non-fascist revolution.

So leftism is a plot to destroy the west? Or at least the destruction of the west is a prerequisite for leftism.

I think neoliberalism and neoconservatism is what is destroying us, not really leftism in general.

Capitalism is doing it faster than we could.

Kek.

it's not really any surprise to see someone with a nazbol flag being completely retarded so why does it still get to me

friendly reminder that both liberalism and conservatism are capitalist in america and thus not true lefties (as in socialist and communists)
liberals would be a bit more tolerable if they voted in a social democrat like b.ernie but they failed at that, sadly

Because Nazbols are just a bit more delusional that nazis and Useful Idiotists in that they actually think they're commies.

Leftism doesn't necessarily have anything to do with that.

neoliberalism=/=social/cultural liberalism

do not touch me u filthy collectivist

This coming from the same "great thinker" who wrote this:
"Women are directly fitted for acting as the nurses and teachers of our early childhood by the fact that they are themselves childish, frivolous and short-sighted; in a word, they are big children all their life long–a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the full-grown man, who is man in the strict sense of the word. See how a girl will fondle a child for days together, dance with it and sing to it; and then think what a man, with the best will in the world, could do if he were put in her place."

"The weakness of their reasoning faculty also explains why it is that women show more sympathy for the unfortunate than men do, and so treat them with more kindness and interest; and why it is that, on the contrary, they are inferior to men in point of justice, and less honorable and conscientious. For it is just because their reasoning power is weak that present circumstances have such a hold over them, and those concrete things, which lie directly before their eyes, exercise a power which is seldom counteracted to any extent by abstract principles of thought, by fixed rules of conduct, firm resolutions, or, in general, by consideration for the past and the future, or regard for what is absent and remote. Accordingly, they possess the first and main elements that go to make a virtuous character, but they are deficient in those secondary qualities which are often a necessary instrument in the formation of it.

Hence, it will be found that the fundamental fault of the female character is that it has no sense of justice."

While they no doubt capitalized on the idea it's a pretty shitty theory to say the idea of race was entirely made up by them. It's easy to see a group of people with less technology and wealth who are noticeably different looking and attribute it to being a "lesser" being. There's that famous experiment by Jane Elliott where she decided a class between blue eyed kids and brown eyed. Green eyed/lighter eyed kids would consider themselves "blue" if they were taught blue was superior, but suddenly their eyes were more "brown" if taught brown was superior. It's the same with religion, sure many rich and powerful use it to oppress the masses, but some actually believe it.

I'm not sure in this case but evolution only takes one mutation. Maybe a gene responsible for creating neuron connections is duplicated and the genotype is dominant. Since some orthodox jewish populations are tight nit and stick to their "own", the mutation could spread quickly but remain isolated.

Since about 2011 I honestly have no fucking clue what "liberal" means anymore; like how "fedora" went from a specific stereotype to a generalized insult.

Now you're saying having a third-world mentality is a good thing?

every single person i met who was a nationalist or ethno nationalist ended up being an uneducated fuck who never opened a book in his life.

nationalist are like football fans (hooligans), they screem, shout, fight, pay allot of money and get emotionally involved in somthing he has no controle over.

he'll be proud of his team if they win as if it was his own victory.
but the players don't even know he exist and don't give a single fuck about him

Look up Tay Sachs disease, I think it is called

Loyalty is a spook

...