JK Rowling comes out as Porky scum

Unfortunately she's always been a massive fan of New Labour. She was 'poor' because she was a 25 year old writer living in central London and was able to claim enough bennies to support a child.

Thanks to 30 years of free-market liberalism something that'll never be possible again in the UK.

Corbyn isn't Dumbledore you guys oh shit

That does seem to be her main concern, she hasn't called him a commie or anything like that.
what I'm surprised at though is how quick people are to forget the polls last year were also against him and he beat those odds because he offered something new and redbaiting is getting diminishing returns.

I'm pretty sure the book acknowledges the house elf stuff is fucked up, I don't know about that other stuff you're talking about though, haven't read or watched.

Typical Hollywood liberal (yes I know she's not from Hollywood but the mentality is the same), this shouldn't really surprise anyone.

In the book
Hermione (who is mudblood) tries to unionize the house elves when she learns the school is sustained by slave labor, convinced that slavery in inherently bad. Turns out house elves disagree and want to be slaves. Dobby is the odd one out, and even he prefers being exploited, just not a slave. The only other house elf to gain freedom turns to alcoholism in despair.
Now the pure blood/mudblood conflict is similar to the pureblood laws of nazi germany, making Voldemort Hitler and Hermione a jew, she certainly fits the stereotype of a academic jew. Now if Hermonie the jew spearheads a civil rights movement, who could the house elves represent?

Most of her books were written by ghostwriters. I think she wrote the first three or four herself and that's it.

HAHA I'M SO MODERATE LOOK AT ME SO INTELLIGENT AND PRAGMATIC

Reminder that in the time you spend reading the 7 Harry Potter books you could have watched them all and read a tonne of great Greek lit.

ugh, why do people use them again? makes no sense to me to wirte for someone else
unelss it's almost entirely her idea and she had help, i'd never have someone else write a book for me

Money. Legacy. Stalin did it.

I regret nothing.

For some writers it's because they simply don't have time to keep cranking out their material. For example, big names in trash novels that come out once or twice a year. They give outlines to their GWs and those GWs crank out that trash and eventually (might) get work of their own published.

For others it's because they can't get work done on time. Their editors or publishers hire ghostwriters to finish things because the original writer can't or won't.

Then again there are those (like Rowling I suspect) that just didn't care after a while because they have literally billions of dollars and simply can't be fucked to sit and write a children's book they no longer give anything resembling a shit about.

For real? Any links to provide for that? I've always liked Rowling because she didn't forget where she came from, but that she didn't have full class consciousness is kind of just the reality of the world (and of course, now she's super rich so… meh), she does know what it means to be poor. Just hasn't tied it into capitalism.

I think her support for "new labor" was more just ignorance on her part, policy wise she's been passionate about solidarity and support with the economically fucked over.

I'd be very disappointed if she used ghost writers, though.

...

I'm heading away from the computer for a while, but I'll see if I can dig up some evidence for you later.

This just makes me clad that I don`t consume literature in English.

When the working class puts Corbyn into power, there will be a grassroots campaign of mass terror against every Blairite vermin in the country that will make Mao's cultural revolution look like a dinner party.

Blairites need to be exterminated as a distinct enemy class. They are the most cancerous element against socialist progress in Britain. Corbyn will hunt them down and drown them like rats.

Corbyn flag when?

methods of rationality was better tbh fam

Is it bad to start drinking before noon?

You know what to do.

fuck this planet

The wizarding world is also clearly autocratic. Despite having a "minister" of magic. There seems to be no elections and top officials seem to be hand picked by unknown unaccountable bureaucrats.

based nick

JK can't world build for shit. it's no surprise.

Lupin was in a heterosexual relationship you filthy liberals

And there are still poor wizards in a society where objects can, unless enchanted not to, be freely replicated at no cost.
Wizard society is sick to it's core.

Did you post this on the other chans /lit/ too?

Remember how Dumbledore fell in love with wizard Hitler and let the wizard holocaust happen?
This makes the whole "your not Dumbledore Jeremy" shit even funnier.

...

Lmao what a stupid little bitch you are, what is it like to be so fucking ignorant ?

Blacks?

made some OC guise

kek

If I still had a copy of photoshop on my hard drive, I'd edit in Corbyn.

When you get rich without class con, you forget how it was to be poor.

That's why we are with the workers and not with the poor.

kill yourself

why?

Anyone read "her new book? Here is a summery, its fan fiction tier.

pics related, the slash fan fiction just writes itself.

goodreads.com/book/show/29056083-harry-potter-and-the-cursed-child---parts-one-and-two
Yeah I know but those reviews.

That sounds like absolute fucking garbage, so I'm sure Rowling herself wrote it.

…Shit nigga I read Order of the Phoenix in a couple hours. In college I watched all the films (extended cut) back to back with friends and it took 24 hours. How fuckin slow do you read?

...

If we ever needed proof that capitalism destroys art, here it is.

Eat shit fun killet

Eat shit fun killer

Nonononono
We need intellectual property, you savage!

If a conglomerate of distributors didn't hold exclusive rights to the works for over a lifetime after the creator dies… WHY WOULD ANYONE ART!?
Who would ever create anything knowing that their work could be replicated and propagated according to technological capabilities!?

Why would anyone develop or research anything?
Imagine a world where R&D isn't entirely directed towards the profits of a very few, imagine the knowledge being available to anyone, who could use it, instead of being hoarded for the profit of very few, very rich people!

WHAT AN ABHORRENT PICTURE!!

Sectarianism can go to hell.

I still like Rowling. And I did enjoy reading Harry Potter, I won't deny that. I just view her as ideologically confused, or uninformed, and that's sad. Yea, capitalism kills art. That's always been the case. Once it reaches a certain level of fame, under capitalism, it reaches a certain type of wealth concentration and consumer-capitalist category, at that point people are making shit they wouldn't make, just for "staying in the game" - and they're suddenly pandering to money, straight up. In a microcosm, you can see it in realtime (the change) on youtube, that point where everything that was originally why they made videos is gone, and suddenly they're all about appealing to whatever capitalist dictate was sent down to them for the "right and proper way" to "earn money" from their "production".

Art will never be free under any sort of economic control, art and creation in general belongs to the revolutionary, even the brightest star in capitalism ends up as little more than repeating the mantra of the economic system that gave rise to them. At best (worst) they become idpolers that ignore economic conditions, at worst they don't even become that, just straight up reactionaries (or "purity" style faggots, again ignoring the economic conditions)

It's all shit.

Go to youtube.com and click the "Music" tab, one long page of "same"… everything sounds the same. That's the future of capitalism. Uniform robotic madness caught in the faith of belief in the market.

yes.

Dumbledore = Eichmann?

this is good, if feel we are close to revealing the deeper truth about Rowlings work.

Dumbledore was more of a liberal
"killing death eaters makes you just as bad as them"

Don't forget how he left Harry with abusive non-parents his whole life (even after he was at Hogwarts) and did nothing.

yeah this was fucked up imo
why didn't he just raise him as his own?

if I remember right it was justified in that his mother cast a spell on him that would keep him safe as long as he lived with his aunt, or something like that

they even had that other crotchety neighbor secretly spying on him

but despite this careful surveillance they never thought to intervene in any way to try and protect him from a decade of mental, physical, and verbal abuse at the hands of his awful "family"

Sirius was gay for james, m8

...

if you had read harry potter you'd already know this.
but HP hasn't been relevant since Warner Bros killed the coldmirror synchros (illegally, btw) so wtf.

because his parents' love protected him, and love is inherited genetically so only true aryans can have it which means his uncle and aunt (incest?) could protect him but others couldn't.
sage for double post, also i didn't read the last book so there might be a less irrational explanation.

Zizek needs to do a HP analysis tbh

Eat shit fun killer

(checked)
just because it's brown doesn't mean the pill is made from coffee

The entire point was that naive direct activism of the sort mawkish teenagers often do will have little effect on deeply rooted systemic problems, sometimes even exacerbating them. This ties into another thread of the elf sub-plot, which is when it becomes clear that the elfs, while limited in many ways compared to that of wizards, is far more powerful in others, but deeply integrated with their servitude at present. This indicates that a true solution probably lies in the calculated creation of a new system for them, not just blindly tearing down the current one.

She didn't though.

Why do these people always forget where they came from

because that place sucked.. and now they don't have to live there or deal with those people.

You'd do the same.

I bet that an 1/8th of all Harry Potter fan-fiction is written under another name by this porky bitch

kek'd

She a gud girl, din du nuffin

did she really say this?

Shes like the epitome of a white girl.

Literally every girl I fuck idolises Hermione Granger. I only fuck white girls. Those types are what seems to be attracted to me.

Srsly

Hermiones naivety is not merely her methods of achieving social change, but believing that the system can be changed.
It's revealed that house elves are constructed to find happiness only in doing their masters will, making the issue of social justice irrelevant, as house elves are slaves by nature.
The power they possess is formidable, but a direct result of their enslavement to the wizards. They can't use their powers with out permission or they will find themselves in extreme discomfort. This is probably tied to the way magic works in the Harry Potter universe, powerful magic often requires restrictions and conditions, like how the spell Harry's mother cast protects him, but only when he lives with his aunt. Or how the spell that hides Harry's parents requires a "keeper". This suggests that even if you somehow freed the elves from slavery, they would end up powerless and disenfranchised. Their power is born from being workers, take that away and they are nothing. This is demonstrated in how Winky turns to alcoholism after Crouch fires her.
This is the true meaning of the elves subplot, the problem is not the system, but bad slave masters such as Lucius Malfoy (the conservative aristocrat) and Bartemius Crouch (the corrupted politician). When serving Dubledore (the homosexual liberal), and Hermione (the feminist Jew), slavery is, claims Rowling, beneficial to all parties.

Also Hermoine is black and Ron marries an Indian.

crony liberalism, even worse

...

...

Nice fresh meme you got there.

This is the ultimate redpill on HP

Holla Forums needs to keep making OC like this.